지속 가능 조달 및 공급업체 탄소 평가 소프트웨어 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the sustainable procurement and Supplier Carbon Scoring Software Market size was valued at USD 3.02 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 3.48 billion in 2026 to reach USD 7.06 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 15.23% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Function (Supplier Engagement and Corrective Action Management, and More), Deployment (Cloud-Based, and On-Premises), Organization Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), End-User Industry (Banking, Financial Services and Insurance, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Sustainable Procurement and Supplier Carbon Scoring Software Market Trends and Insights

Rising Scope 3 Disclosure Pressure from Enterprise Buyers

The sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market is being driven by the tightening timelines for Scope 3 reporting in major economies. California adopted its initial reporting regulations for SB 253 in February 2026, and the rule requires companies above the revenue threshold to begin filing Scope 1 and Scope 2 disclosures in 2026, with Scope 3 obligations following after that first phase. The European Union also kept Scope 3 disclosure inside the revised sustainability reporting framework, even after reducing the overall number of required data points in the 2026 amendment. This means buyers can no longer rely on broad spend-based estimates for long, because the quality and origin of supplier data now matter more in formal reporting. The practical result is that procurement teams are turning supplier outreach, data capture, and scoring into recurring, software-led work rather than one-time spreadsheet exercises. The sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market is therefore gaining demand from enterprises that want to avoid last-minute supplier data gaps once reporting cycles begin.

Procurement-Led Decarbonization Becomes a Budgeted Workflow

The sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market is also expanding because procurement teams are now treating supplier emissions management as a funded operating task. EcoVadis reported in May 2026 that more than USD 2.5 trillion in global spend was already linked to sustainability risk insights across its network, which shows that supplier sustainability screening has moved into mainstream sourcing activity. The same update said that 55,838 companies were reporting at least 1 GHG metric and that 25,852 new companies adopted sustainability ratings in 2025, indicating growing participation on both the buyer and supplier sides. Once procurement owns the workflow, software spending becomes easier to justify because the tools support supplier engagement, risk review, and sourcing decisions. This shifts the category away from discretionary ESG budgets and closer to core procurement systems. The sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market benefits directly from that change, as recurring procurement activity creates steadier demand than periodic reporting projects.

Supplier Data Gaps Limit Score Reliability

The sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market still faces a fundamental quality issue because many supplier records remain incomplete. The issue is strongest in long supplier tails, where smaller vendors often have limited sustainability staff and weaker internal data systems. That leads many buying organizations to work with a mix of verified values, partial disclosures, and estimated records inside the same scoring environment. When procurement teams cannot demonstrate how much of the score is based on primary supplier information, confidence in the result declines. This creates hesitation during vendor selection because buyers do not want a platform that produces neat scores without strong underlying coverage. The sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market, therefore, remains exposed to adoption delays, with data collection depth still weaker than disclosure expectations.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Supplier Data Digitization Improves Emissions Scoring Accuracy
2. Audit-Ready Carbon Data Reduces Reporting Friction
3. Methodology Fragmentation Reduces Score Comparability

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Supplier carbon scoring and benchmarking accounted for 41.45% of the market in 2025, making it the largest function in the sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market. That lead reflects how procurement teams usually start with a practical question: which supplier poses lower carbon risk and which should be prioritized for sourcing or engagement. Benchmarking also gives buyers a clear way to compare suppliers across categories and regions, making it easier to incorporate carbon performance into routine procurement decisions. In the first phase of adoption, many organizations preferred scoring layers because they could work with available supplier submissions and estimation methods rather than redesign the entire data collection process.

Supplier carbon data collection is projected to grow at a 16.77% CAGR through 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing functional segment. This pattern shows that early scoring tools are now being followed by deeper investment in data capture, because buyers want stronger evidence behind the scores they use. The sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market is moving from output display to input quality, and this shift raises the value of supplier portals, guided questionnaires, document handling, and validation rules. Corrective action management and reporting functions also remain important because a score has limited value if it does not lead to supplier follow-up, target tracking, and audit-ready records. Other functions continue to absorb adjacent use cases, such as support for product carbon footprint and digital product information needs, broadening the functional map over time.

Cloud-based deployment accounted for 72.11% share in 2025 and is also projected to grow at a 17.45% CAGR through 2031. This means the largest deployment model is also the fastest-growing in the sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market. Cloud delivery fits the category well because suppliers, buyers, and internal teams need access to shared workflows without the heavy local infrastructure required. It also supports faster product updates, broader supplier onboarding, and easier integration of automation features into everyday use.

SAP's 2026 product roadmap showed how differentiated features are increasingly tied to cloud delivery, with new sustainability agents built into its software environment rather than treated as separate manual tools. SAP also highlighted Q1 2026 updates in Sustainability Footprint Management that reduced dependence on manual data handling and extended ERP-linked calculation workflows. On-premises deployment still matters for organizations with strict residency, security, or procurement rules, especially in sensitive sectors and long-standing ERP environments. Even so, the balance of innovation is clearly moving toward cloud platforms, leaving on-premises solutions more focused on continuity than on category leadership. This makes deployment a structural competitive advantage for vendors that already operate at scale in cloud-based procurement and carbon data environments.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Function
  • Supplier Carbon Data Collection
  • Supplier Carbon Scoring and Benchmarking
  • Supplier Engagement and Corrective Action Management
  • Carbon Reporting and Audit Trail Management
  • Other Functions
• By Deployment
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premises
• By Organization Size
  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium Enterprises
• By End-User Industry
  • Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance
  • Information Technology and Telecom
  • Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail and Consumer Goods
  • Automotive and Mobility
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Government and Public Sector
  • Other End-User Industries
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East
    • Saudi Arabia
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Turkey
    • Rest of Middle East
  • Africa
    • South Africa
    • Nigeria
    • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Europe held a 36.18% share in 2025, giving it the leading regional position in the sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market. The region moved earlier than most others because large companies already had to prepare supplier-linked sustainability information for formal disclosures. The 2026 EU amendment narrowed the reporting scope in employee and turnover terms, but it kept Scope 3 obligations within the framework, meaning supplier data needs did not disappear with the simplification. This helps explain why Europe remains the largest revenue base even as reporting rules are being refined. Companies in Germany, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom already operate in procurement environments where supplier sustainability expectations are more established, so software adoption is supported by existing internal processes as much as by new compliance pressure.

North America held the second-largest regional position in 2025, supported mainly by U.S.-based multinationals with broad procurement networks and early exposure to California's reporting timetable. California's February 2026 rulemaking made disclosure preparation a near-term operational task, increasing the urgency around supplier data collection and internal readiness. South America remained smaller, but export-facing companies in sectors such as commodities and manufacturing are still affected when large overseas buyers demand stronger supplier emissions records. Middle East and Africa also remained smaller in 2026, though the region offers entry points where buyers are building procurement modernization and sustainability reporting capabilities in parallel. Across these regions, adoption tends to start with larger enterprises that have international customers, stricter governance expectations, or exposure to multinational supply chain standards.

Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at a 16.23% CAGR through 2031, making it the fastest-growing region in the sustainable procurement and supplier carbon scoring software market. Japan's Financial Services Agency released its phased roadmap in April 2026 and set mandatory sustainability disclosure requirements for larger Prime Market companies, effective for fiscal years beginning in April 2026, including Scope 3 expectations under the new framework. This gives the region an important regulatory anchor that reaches directly into listed companies and their supplier networks. Growth in Asia-Pacific is also supported by export-side pressure, as suppliers serving European buyers need better records of embedded emissions and related carbon data. As a result, the region is becoming a major expansion area for platforms that can scale supplier onboarding while still maintaining documentation strong enough to meet global customer requirements.

1. EcoVadis SAS
2. IntegrityNext GmbH
3. Worldfavor AB
4. Greenly SAS
5. SAP SE
6. IBM Corporation
7. Siemens AG
8. Schneider Electric SE
9. Persefoni AI, Inc.
10. Watershed Technology, Inc.
11. Sphera Solutions, Inc.
12. Ivalua Inc.
13. Coupa Software Incorporated
14. Jaggaer, LLC
15. GEP Worldwide
16. Oracle Corporation
17. Basware Corporation
18. Cority Software Inc.
19. Sedex Holdings Limited
20. Enablon SA
21. Normative AB
22. Plan A Earth GmbH
23. Emitwise Ltd
24. Climatiq GmbH
25. Cozero GmbH
26. CarbonChain Ltd

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising Scope 3 Disclosure Pressure from Enterprise Buyers
  • 4.2.2 Procurement-Led Decarbonization Becomes a Budgeted Workflow
  • 4.2.3 Supplier Data Digitization Improves Emissions Scoring Accuracy
  • 4.2.4 Audit-Ready Carbon Data Reduces Reporting Friction
  • 4.2.5 Carbon Scoring Becomes Embedded in Supplier Selection
  • 4.2.6 AI-Assisted Supplier Intake Reduces Manual Follow-Up Cost
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Supplier Data Gaps Limit Score Reliability
  • 4.3.2 Methodology Fragmentation Reduces Score Comparability
  • 4.3.3 Integration Complexity With ERP and Procurement Suites
  • 4.3.4 Buyer Fatigue from Overlapping ESG Questionnaires
• 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.6 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.7 Technological Outlook
• 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.8.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.8.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.8.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Function
  • 5.1.1 Supplier Carbon Data Collection
  • 5.1.2 Supplier Carbon Scoring and Benchmarking
  • 5.1.3 Supplier Engagement and Corrective Action Management
  • 5.1.4 Carbon Reporting and Audit Trail Management
  • 5.1.5 Other Functions
• 5.2 By Deployment
  • 5.2.1 Cloud-Based
  • 5.2.2 On-Premises
• 5.3 By Organization Size
  • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
  • 5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
• 5.4 By End-User Industry
  • 5.4.1 Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance
  • 5.4.2 Information Technology and Telecom
  • 5.4.3 Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • 5.4.4 Manufacturing
  • 5.4.5 Retail and Consumer Goods
  • 5.4.6 Automotive and Mobility
  • 5.4.7 Energy and Utilities
  • 5.4.8 Government and Public Sector
  • 5.4.9 Other End-User Industries
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Russia
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 India
    • 5.5.4.3 Japan
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.3 Turkey
    • 5.5.5.4 Rest of Middle East
  • 5.5.6 Africa
    • 5.5.6.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.6.2 Nigeria
    • 5.5.6.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 EcoVadis SAS
  • 6.4.2 IntegrityNext GmbH
  • 6.4.3 Worldfavor AB
  • 6.4.4 Greenly SAS
  • 6.4.5 SAP SE
  • 6.4.6 IBM Corporation
  • 6.4.7 Siemens AG
  • 6.4.8 Schneider Electric SE
  • 6.4.9 Persefoni AI, Inc.
  • 6.4.10 Watershed Technology, Inc.
  • 6.4.11 Sphera Solutions, Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Ivalua Inc.
  • 6.4.13 Coupa Software Incorporated
  • 6.4.14 Jaggaer, LLC
  • 6.4.15 GEP Worldwide
  • 6.4.16 Oracle Corporation
  • 6.4.17 Basware Corporation
  • 6.4.18 Cority Software Inc.
  • 6.4.19 Sedex Holdings Limited
  • 6.4.20 Enablon SA
  • 6.4.21 Normative AB
  • 6.4.22 Plan A Earth GmbH
  • 6.4.23 Emitwise Ltd
  • 6.4.24 Climatiq GmbH
  • 6.4.25 Cozero GmbH
  • 6.4.26 CarbonChain Ltd

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment