소포제 : 시장 점유율 분석, 산업 동향·통계 데이터, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the anti-foaming agents market size is expected to grow from USD 6.04 billion in 2025 to USD 6.41 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 8.64 billion by 2031 at 6.15% CAGR over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Type (Silicon-Based Anti-Forming Agent, Oil-Based Anti-Forming Agent and More), Application (Pulp and Paper, Paints and Coatings, Food and Beverages and More) and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Middle East and Africa). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD) and Volume (tonnes).

Global Anti-foaming Agent Market Trends and Insights

Expansion of food and beverage processing industries, including brewing, soft drinks, and dairy

Food and beverage manufacturers are adopting higher-capacity fermentation vessels and continuous-flow pasteurizers to address rising per-capita consumption in emerging markets. However, these systems produce more foam per unit throughput compared to traditional batch equipment. Wacker's SILFOAM product line for brewing recommends dosages between 5 and 50 parts per million (ppm) to manage foam during wort boiling and yeast propagation. The product complies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 21 CFR 173.340, ensuring no off-flavors are introduced into the finished beer. Dairy processors encounter similar challenges, as ultra-high-temperature sterilization of milk at 135 degrees Celsius to 150 degrees Celsius generates protein-stabilized foam that can clog heat exchangers, reducing thermal efficiency by up to 12 percent if not controlled. Additionally, the growing demand for plant-based beverages such as soy, oat, and almond adds complexity. Vegetable proteins exhibit different foaming behaviors compared to casein, necessitating customized antifoam formulations that ensure effectiveness while meeting clean-label consumer preferences.

Growth in fermentation-based industries like biotech, enzymes, and biofuels producing foam

Biopharmaceutical contract manufacturers are expanding the production of monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins using 20,000-liter single-use bioreactors. In these systems, dissolved oxygen transfer relies on fine-bubble aeration, which naturally generates foam. To manage this, Momentive's food-grade silicone emulsions are applied at concentrations of 10 to 100 parts per million (ppm) to collapse foam without affecting cell viability or downstream chromatography processes. Similarly, industrial enzyme producers, such as Novozymes and DSM, use fed-batch fermentation for amylase and protease production. In these processes, foam carryover into off-gas filters can cause backpressure spikes and reduce bioreactor working volume by 15 percent to 20 percent. Biofuel refineries converting lignocellulosic feedstocks into ethanol also face foam-related challenges during enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification-fermentation. In these operations, antifoam costs account for 0.8 percent to 1.2 percent of total variable operating expenses. This cost sensitivity is encouraging formulators to adopt water-based polyether defoamers, which provide acceptable performance at lower costs compared to silicone alternatives. However, re-foaming remains a challenge in high-agitation zones.

Strict environmental regulations on silicone, mineral-oil, and solvent-based defoamer components.

The European Union's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation restricts the use of D4, D5, and D6 cyclic siloxanes in wash-off personal care products and is considering similar restrictions for industrial antifoams due to evidence of persistence and bioaccumulation in aquatic sediments . Suppliers working to comply with these thresholds face research and development costs ranging from USD 500,000 to USD 2 million per product line, with no assurance that alternative chemistries will achieve the same performance levels in high-shear or high-temperature applications. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency's review under the Toxic Substances Control Act of certain mineral-oil fractions used in defoamers has delayed new product registrations, leading to supply constraints for oil-based formulations in food-contact applications. Compliance requirements also include International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14001 and ISO 9001 certifications, which are increasingly mandated by multinational buyers as part of supplier qualification processes . Smaller regional producers without these certifications risk losing access to Tier-1 accounts. These regulatory challenges are particularly significant for silicone and mineral-oil chemistries, driving increased interest in bio-based alternatives despite their current performance limitations.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Rising wastewater treatment needs in municipal and industrial plants to manage foam
2. Demand for enhanced productivity in pulp and paper mills through stabilized operations
3. Concerns over aquatic toxicity and bioaccumulation of certain antifoam chemistries

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Silicone-based anti-foaming agents accounted for 63.02% of the market share in 2025 and are projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.35% through 2031, surpassing oil-based and water-based alternatives. This strong market position is due to polydimethylsiloxane's ability to maintain surface activity across a wide temperature range of -40°C to +200°C, which is unmatched by vegetable-oil or mineral-oil chemistries without experiencing thermal degradation. According to Wacker's technical data sheets for SILFOAM SE, viscosities range from 1,000 to 100,000 centistokes, enabling formulators to adjust droplet size and spreading coefficients for varied applications, including high-shear processes like jet-dyeing and low-shear processes such as anaerobic digestion.

Regulatory approvals, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 173.340 for food contact, European Union (EU) Regulation 10/2011 for plastics, and National Sanitation Foundation/American National Standards Institute (NSF/ANSI) 60 for potable water, further strengthen silicone's position in risk-sensitive industries such as pharmaceuticals and municipal water treatment.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Type
  • Silicon-Based Anti-Forming Agent
  • Oil-Based Anti-Forming Agent
  • Water-Based Anti-Forming Agent
• By Application
  • Pulp and Paper
  • Paints and Coatings
  • Food and Beverages
  • Oil and Gas
  • Water and Waste-water Treatment
  • Pharmaceuticals and Bioprocessing
  • Detergents and Cleaning Chemicals
  • Textiles and Leather
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
    • Rest of North America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Netherlands
    • Poland
    • Belgium
    • Sweden
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
    • Thailand
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
    • Chile
    • Peru
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East and Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Turkey
    • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific captured 37.01% of global revenue in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.6% through 2031, making it the fastest-growing region. In 2024, China's industrial wastewater discharge exceeded 7.5 billion cubic meters, with the textile, chemical, and food-processing industries contributing the majority. The Ministry of Ecology and Environment's effluent standards require biochemical oxygen demand levels below 10 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for municipal plants and 30 mg/L for industrial dischargers. These regulations are pushing operators to optimize aeration systems and adopt antifoams that do not interfere with activated-sludge microbiology. Similarly, India's Central Pollution Control Board tightened its norms in 2024, mandating textile dye houses to limit total dissolved solids in effluent to below 2,100 mg/L. Achieving this target requires multi-stage treatment processes and foam control at both biological and chemical stages.

North America and Europe remain the leading regions in the anti-foaming agent market. However, their growth rates are below the global average due to mill closures in the pulp and paper industry, which represents the largest application segment. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 2024 guidance on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) treatment is prompting municipal wastewater plants to adopt foam-fractionation systems. These systems concentrate PFAS into smaller waste streams for destruction, necessitating anti-foaming agents that do not co-concentrate with PFAS or foul ion-exchange resins. In Europe, restrictions under the European Union's Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation on cyclic siloxanes have driven reformulations toward linear polydimethylsiloxanes and bio-based alternatives. This transition temporarily constrained supply in 2024, leading to an 8% to 12% increase in spot prices for certain food-grade segments.

Brazil, the largest global exporter of eucalyptus pulp, consumes significant volumes of anti-foaming agents. However, economic instability and currency depreciation periodically impact import demand. In Argentina and Chile, the expansion of lithium-brine processing has increased the need for foam control during solvent extraction. This application could drive localized demand growth if lithium carbonate production scales as anticipated. In the Middle East, petrochemical complexes in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates utilize anti-foaming agents in ethylene crackers and polyethylene reactors. These facilities prefer high-temperature silicone formulations capable of withstanding process conditions exceeding 180 degrees Celsius. Meanwhile, in Nigeria and Egypt, investments in municipal wastewater infrastructure are creating opportunities for cost-effective oil-based and water-based anti-foaming agents. However, procurement in these regions often depends on funding from development-finance institutions, which can involve lengthy approval cycles lasting several years.

1. BASF SE
2. Dow Inc.
3. Evonik Industries AG
4. Wacker Chemie AG
5. Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
6. Clariant AG
7. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
8. Ecolab Inc.
9. Kemira Oyj
10. Elementis plc
11. Air Products & Chemicals Inc.
12. Momentive Performance Materials Inc.
13. Solvay SA
14. BYK-Chemie GmbH
15. Munzing Chemie
16. Accepta Ltd.
17. Applied Material Solutions Inc.
18. PennWhite Ltd.
19. World Chem Industries
20. HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Expansion of food and beverage processing industries, including brewing, soft drinks, and dairy
  • 4.2.2 Growth in fermentation-based industries like biotech, enzymes, and biofuels producing foam
  • 4.2.3 Rising wastewater treatment needs in municipal and industrial plants to manage foam
  • 4.2.4 Demand for enhanced productivity in pulp and paper mills through stabilized operations
  • 4.2.5 Shift to high-speed bottling and packaging lines sensitive to liquid foaming.
  • 4.2.6 Technical benefits of silicone-based antifoams, including thermal stability and broad compatibility
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Strict environmental regulations on silicone, mineral-oil, and solvent-based defoamer components
  • 4.3.2 Concerns over aquatic toxicity and bioaccumulation of certain antifoam chemistries
  • 4.3.3 Lower efficiency of bio-based defoamers compared to conventional silicone-based alternatives.
  • 4.3.4 Supply chain disruptions affecting silicone oils, surfactants, and specialty waxes for defoamers.
• 4.4 Supply Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Outlook
• 4.6 Porter's Five Forces
  • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
  • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitute Products
  • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE AND VOLUME)

• 5.1 By Type
  • 5.1.1 Silicon-Based Anti-Forming Agent
  • 5.1.2 Oil-Based Anti-Forming Agent
  • 5.1.3 Water-Based Anti-Forming Agent
• 5.2 By Application
  • 5.2.1 Pulp and Paper
  • 5.2.2 Paints and Coatings
  • 5.2.3 Food and Beverages
  • 5.2.4 Oil and Gas
  • 5.2.5 Water and Waste-water Treatment
  • 5.2.6 Pharmaceuticals and Bioprocessing
  • 5.2.7 Detergents and Cleaning Chemicals
  • 5.2.8 Textiles and Leather
• 5.3 By Geography
  • 5.3.1 North America
    • 5.3.1.1 United States
    • 5.3.1.2 Canada
    • 5.3.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.3.1.4 Rest of North America
  • 5.3.2 Europe
    • 5.3.2.1 Germany
    • 5.3.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.3.2.3 Italy
    • 5.3.2.4 France
    • 5.3.2.5 Spain
    • 5.3.2.6 Netherlands
    • 5.3.2.7 Poland
    • 5.3.2.8 Belgium
    • 5.3.2.9 Sweden
    • 5.3.2.10 Rest of Europe
  • 5.3.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.3.3.1 China
    • 5.3.3.2 India
    • 5.3.3.3 Japan
    • 5.3.3.4 Australia
    • 5.3.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.3.3.6 Thailand
    • 5.3.3.7 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.3.4 South America
    • 5.3.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.3.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.3.4.3 Colombia
    • 5.3.4.4 Chile
    • 5.3.4.5 Peru
    • 5.3.4.6 Rest of South America
  • 5.3.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.3.5.1 South Africa
    • 5.3.5.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.3.5.3 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.3.5.4 Turkey
    • 5.3.5.5 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Ranking Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global-level Overview, Market-level Overview, Core Segments, Financials (if available), Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 BASF SE
  • 6.4.2 Dow Inc.
  • 6.4.3 Evonik Industries AG
  • 6.4.4 Wacker Chemie AG
  • 6.4.5 Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
  • 6.4.6 Clariant AG
  • 6.4.7 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.8 Ecolab Inc.
  • 6.4.9 Kemira Oyj
  • 6.4.10 Elementis plc
  • 6.4.11 Air Products & Chemicals Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Momentive Performance Materials Inc.
  • 6.4.13 Solvay SA
  • 6.4.14 BYK-Chemie GmbH
  • 6.4.15 Munzing Chemie
  • 6.4.16 Accepta Ltd.
  • 6.4.17 Applied Material Solutions Inc.
  • 6.4.18 PennWhite Ltd.
  • 6.4.19 World Chem Industries
  • 6.4.20 HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK