동맥절개 폐쇄 디바이스 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, arteriotomy closure devices market size in 2026 is estimated at USD 2.14 billion, growing from 2025 value of USD 1.99 billion with 2031 projections showing USD 3.06 billion, growing at 7.44% CAGR over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Product (Active Closure Devices, Passive Closure Devices), Application (Femoral Arterial Access Procedures, Radial/Brachial Arterial Access Procedures, Large-Bore Access), End User (Hospitals, and More), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa, South America). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Arteriotomy Closure Devices Market Trends and Insights

Increasing Prevalence of Cardiovascular & Peripheral Vascular Disorders

Global cardiovascular disease affected 655 million individuals in 2024, and peripheral arterial disease cases have risen 23% since 2010, resulting in sustained growth across diagnostic angiography, PCI, and peripheral interventions that all require reliable closure solutions. Procedure complexity in diabetic populations often demands repeat access, translating into steady, recurring demand within the arteriotomy closure devices market. Devices cut hemostasis time to around 1 minute versus 10 minutes for manual compression, allowing cath-labs to increase daily caseloads. Precision therapies targeting specific arterial beds likewise necessitate differentiated closure platforms, broadening the product mix that facilities must stock. Consequently, manufacturers that can offer comprehensive portfolios spanning sheath sizes from 5F to 24F are poised to capture incremental revenue.

Rising Geriatric Population & PCI Volumes

Patients older than 75 are the fastest-growing PCI cohort; comorbid calcification and anticoagulation elevate bleeding risk, making device-based closure preferable to manual compression. Outreach data show technical success rates of 94% and major complication rates below 1% when operators deploy closure systems in octogenarian cases. Same-day discharge adds further momentum, particularly since Medicare broadened outpatient PCI reimbursement in 2024. Health-systems also emphasize patient quality-of-life, and quicker ambulation lessens fall risk and hospital-acquired infections. Together these factors reinforce structural, long-term demand drivers for the arteriotomy closure devices market.

High ASPs of Active Closure Devices

Active closure systems range from USD 200 to 400 each, significantly above the USD 50-100 cost of manual compression kits. When large-bore TAVR cases require multiple devices, per-procedure spend can exceed USD 1,000, straining budgets in price-sensitive regions. Although bundled purchasing can offset inpatient days saved, public hospitals in emerging markets often lack capital flexibility, slowing penetration outside tier-one centers.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Rapid Uptake of Transradial & Same-Day Discharge Cath-Lab Programs
2. Growth in Large-Bore Interventions (TAVR, EVAR) Requiring Percutaneous Closure
3. Device-Related Complications & Steep Learning Curve

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Active platforms accounted for 58.62% of 2025 revenue within the arteriotomy closure devices market, primarily due to suture-mediated systems that span 5F-21F sheath sizes and achieve a 97.5% technical success rate in real-world registries. Their immediate hemostasis supports cath-lab throughput, and broad procedural coverage underpins their market leadership.

Passive solutions, however, are expected to post an 11.49% CAGR through 2031, as bio-absorbable polymers address previous concerns over retained collagen plugs. Early clinical experience suggests 1-minute average hemostasis and rapid resorption within 30 days, which helps passive entries secure an incremental share, particularly in younger and bariatric populations where foreign-body avoidance is paramount.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Product
  • Active Closure Devices
    • Suture-mediated Systems
    • Clip-based Systems
  • Passive Closure Devices
    • Collagen Plug Devices
    • Polymer/Sealant-based Devices
    • External Compression & Assist Systems
• By Application
  • Femoral Arterial Access Procedures
  • Radial/Brachial Arterial Access Procedures
  • Large-bore Access (TAVR, EVAR, TEVAR)
• By End User
  • Hospitals
  • Ambulatory Surgical & Cath-Lab Centers
  • Specialty Cardiology Clinics
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • Australia
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East & Africa
    • GCC
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America

Geography Analysis

North America captured 42.98% of 2025 global revenue in the arteriotomy closure devices market. Medicare and private insurers reimburse closure tools without added patient cost, prompting universal adoption for PCI and electrophysiology procedures. United States operators also cite medico-legal imperatives favoring device-based closure to minimize bleeding complications. Canada's single-payer model supports closure uptake where cost-utility studies show diminished inpatient days, while Mexico's growing private hospital sector is upgrading cath-lab capabilities aligned with premium closure technologies.

Europe remains a mature but sizeable arena characterized by stringent evidence requirements and value-oriented purchasing frameworks. Germany leads implantation volumes; the United Kingdom quickly embraces cost-effective plug-based devices; and France and Italy sustain steady growth due to high procedural load and favorable coding for same-day discharge. Post-Brexit regulatory divergence complicates product registration timelines, yet EU MDR certification continues to promote technology differentiation on safety credentials.

Asia Pacific is projected to deliver the fastest regional CAGR of 8.83% to 2031 on the back of expanding cardiac care infrastructure and rising incidence of ischemic heart disease. China's investment in public and private cath-labs accelerates volume growth, while domestic device players increasingly partner with global leaders for technology transfer. Japan's advanced reimbursement and procedural sophistication underpin early adoption of bio-absorbable closure platforms. India's demand outlook remains robust, albeit tempered by acute price sensitivity that requires tiered product offerings and lean distribution.

1. Abbott Laboratories
2. Terumo
3. Medtronic
4. Teleflex
5. Cardinal Health
6. Haemonetics (Cardiva Medical)
7. Merit Medical Systems
8. Boston Scientific
9. Vivasure Medical
10. Otsuka Medical Devices (Veryan)
11. AngioDynamics
12. Essential Medical
13. InSeal Medical
14. Scion Cardiovascular
15. B. Braun
16. Lepu Medical
17. Advanced Vascular Dynamics
18. Endologix
19. Shimadzu MD Systems

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Increasing Prevalence of Cardiovascular & Peripheral Vascular Disorders
  • 4.2.2 Rising Geriatric Population & PCI Volumes
  • 4.2.3 Rapid Uptake of Transradial & Same-Day Discharge Cath-Lab Programs
  • 4.2.4 Growth In Large-Bore Interventions (TAVR, EVAR) Requiring Percutaneous Closure
  • 4.2.5 Reimbursement Reforms Incentivizing Outpatient Vascular Procedures
  • 4.2.6 Breakthrough Bio-Absorbable / Polymer Sealants Improving Safety Profile
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Asps of Active Closure Devices
  • 4.3.2 Device-Related Complications & Steep Learning Curve
  • 4.3.3 Cost-Containment Pressures in Emerging Markets
  • 4.3.4 Supply-Chain Dependency on Medical-Grade Collagen & PEG
• 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.5 Technological Outlook
• 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.6.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value in USD)

• 5.1 By Product
  • 5.1.1 Active Closure Devices
    • 5.1.1.1 Suture-mediated Systems
    • 5.1.1.2 Clip-based Systems
  • 5.1.2 Passive Closure Devices
    • 5.1.2.1 Collagen Plug Devices
    • 5.1.2.2 Polymer/Sealant-based Devices
    • 5.1.2.3 External Compression & Assist Systems
• 5.2 By Application
  • 5.2.1 Femoral Arterial Access Procedures
  • 5.2.2 Radial/Brachial Arterial Access Procedures
  • 5.2.3 Large-bore Access (TAVR, EVAR, TEVAR)
• 5.3 By End User
  • 5.3.1 Hospitals
  • 5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgical & Cath-Lab Centers
  • 5.3.3 Specialty Cardiology Clinics
• 5.4 By Geography
  • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 Japan
    • 5.4.3.3 India
    • 5.4.3.4 Australia
    • 5.4.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.4.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.4.4.1 GCC
    • 5.4.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
  • 5.4.5 South America
    • 5.4.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of South America

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Market Share Analysis
• 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products & Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.3.1 Abbott Laboratories
  • 6.3.2 Terumo Corporation
  • 6.3.3 Medtronic
  • 6.3.4 Teleflex Incorporated
  • 6.3.5 Cardinal Health (Cordis)
  • 6.3.6 Haemonetics (Cardiva Medical)
  • 6.3.7 Merit Medical Systems
  • 6.3.8 Boston Scientific Corporation
  • 6.3.9 Vivasure Medical
  • 6.3.10 Otsuka Medical Devices (Veryan)
  • 6.3.11 AngioDynamics
  • 6.3.12 Essential Medical
  • 6.3.13 InSeal Medical
  • 6.3.14 Scion Cardiovascular
  • 6.3.15 B. Braun Melsungen AG
  • 6.3.16 Lepu Medical Technology
  • 6.3.17 Advanced Vascular Dynamics
  • 6.3.18 Endologix
  • 6.3.19 Shimadzu MD Systems

7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment