군용 센서 : 시장 점유율 분석, 산업 동향 및 통계 데이터, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the military sensors market size is expected to grow from USD 12.31 billion in 2025 to USD 13.04 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 17.35 billion by 2031 at 5.89% CAGR over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Sensor Type (Radar Sensors, Lidar Sensors, Acoustic Sensors and More), Platform (Airborne, Land, Naval, and Space-Based), Application (Target Recognition and Fire Control, Communication and Navigation, and More), Technology (Photonic and AESA Sensors, and More), and Geography (North America, Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Military Sensors Market Trends and Insights

Surge in ISR-focused defense budgets

Annual appropriations are shifting decisively toward persistent global surveillance. The Pentagon's FY 2025 plan allocates USD 108.7 million for Wide-Field-of-View tracking satellites and USD 76 million for Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensors. This confirms that orbital architectures now underpin early-warning doctrine. European governments are mirroring the trend; Sweden's acquisition of the TPY-4 radar underscores NATO's push for wide-area air-defense coverage. ISR allocations increasingly bundle AI edge-processing modules, enabling sensors to filter clutter at the collection point instead of flooding command centers. Budget realignment also favors open-system architectures that future-proof platforms against rapid threat evolution and software-defined waveform updates.

Rapid uptake of UAV-borne miniaturized sensors

Unmanned aircraft are now primary carriers of advanced payloads. General Atomics and Saab have demonstrated an airborne early-warning variant of the MQ-9B that displaces traditional E-2-class assets at lower cost. Miniaturization allows AESA radars, EW pods, and hyperspectral imagers to fit onto Group-3 drones, expanding coverage of forward areas without risking crewed platforms. France's frontline micro-factories produce FPV drones with embedded sensors in three-hour cycles, showing how additive manufacturing reduces logistics tails. The trend drives a distributed detection model where swarms relay fused data to commanders, shrinking sensor-to-shooter timelines.

High acquisition and lifecycle costs of next-gen sensor suites

Cutting-edge sensor arrays are stretching procurement budgets. Raytheon's USD 647 million SPY-6 production award illustrates that hardware price is only the entry fee; support costs can rise 200-300% over the life-of-type. Smaller nations hesitate to commit, creating a tiered adoption curve that advantages well-funded militaries. Soldier-level optics now feature augmented reality overlays and uncooled thermal cores, pushing unit prices far above legacy NVGs, as Elbit's USD 139 million binocular order shows. Budget pressure incentivizes open-architecture designs and modular upgrade kits that defer obsolescence without full recapitalization.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Escalating radar deployments along contested borders
2. AI-enabled multi-sensor fusion for real-time battlespace awareness
3. Stringent ITAR/export-control regimes

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Radar arrays generated USD 4.81 billion in 2025, equal to 39.10% of the military sensors market. Their dominance stems from all-weather reach and target-class discrimination across air-and-missile defense corridors. The segment benefits from gallium-nitride power amplifiers that lift range while shrinking size and cooling loads. Yet EO/IR modules grow fastest at 6.37% CAGR as forces demand passive, low-probability-of-intercept tracking. The F-22's panoramic IR defensive system typifies how thermal cameras now double as threat-warning gear, extending radar-silent survivability.

Precision strike doctrine drives EO/IR proliferation aboard UAVs, rotorcraft, and soldier helmets. Multispectral gimbals deliver day-night imagery streamed through encrypted datalinks, while cooled mid-wave detectors provide long-range identification. Acoustic-sensor spending rises in submarine hunting as low-frequency active sonars pair with machine-learning auto-classifiers. Chemical-biological-radiological (CBR) sensors are regaining prominence after the 2024 incidents underscored the risk of non-kinetic attacks. LiDAR adoption accelerates for autonomous convoy navigation and terrain mapping, leveraging automotive supply-chain cost curves. MEMS inertial units achieve less than 1°/h bias drift, enabling precision fires in GPS-denied zones. Laboratory breakthroughs at the University of Colorado suggest quantum atom-interferometer compasses could displace gyros, a shift that may reorder long-term procurement priorities.

Land platforms accounted for 42.10% of 2025 revenue, reflecting heavy investment in counter-battery radars, coastal surveillance arrays, and border-fence sensor networks. The military sensors market sees steady contract flow for truck-mounted, AESA-equipped radars that relocate within minutes and cue precision fires. However, airborne payloads exhibit the briskest 7.05% CAGR. The MQ-9B AEW variant compresses airborne-warning costs by magnitude versus large turboprop aircraft, spurring allied air forces to reallocate surveillance budgets.

Rotorcraft fleets integrate compact AESAs for long-range maritime search, while High-Altitude, Long-Endurance drones carry hyperspectral kits that detect camouflaged armor. Naval modernization adds panoramic IR cameras atop masts and variable-depth sonars below hulls, creating a layered anti-submarine bubble. The military sensors market size for space-based platforms will expand strongly as Northrop Grumman's tracking satellites transition from R&D to production funding. Breakthrough infrared photodiodes from Aalto University improve responsiveness 35% at telecommunication wavelengths, promising lighter satellite payloads and reduced cooling loads.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Sensor Type
  • Radar Sensors
  • Electro-Optical/Infra-Red (EO/IR) Sensors
  • Acoustic (Sonar) Sensors
  • Magnetic and Seismic Sensors
  • Chemical, Biological and Radiological Sensors
  • LiDAR Sensors
  • MEMS Inertial and Environmental Sensors
• By Platform
  • Airborne
  • Land
  • Naval
  • Space-based
• By Application
  • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
  • Communication and Navigation
  • Target Recognition and Fire Control
  • Electronic Warfare (EW) and Counter-Measures
  • Command, Control, and Situation Awareness
  • Integrated Soldier Systems
• By Technology
  • MEMS and Nano-technology Sensors
  • Photonic and AESA Sensors
  • AI/Edge-computing-enabled Sensors
  • Quantum and Cold-atom Sensors
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Germany
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • UAE
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America generated 37.20% of 2025 revenue in the military sensors market, sustained by the Space Development Agency's proliferated-LEO constellations and Big-Five primes that vertically integrate sensors, processors, and effectors. The SPY-6 radar line funds a multi-year production ramp and underpins the region's edge in gallium-nitride power modules. Canada contributes active electronically steered sonar for Arctic domain awareness, while Mexico fields modular counter-UAS towers along critical corridors, broadening regional demand. University-industry consortia accelerate lab-to-range cycles, making North America a first adopter of quantum compasses and photonic RF apertures.

Asia-Pacific posts the fastest 5.41% CAGR through 2031, anchored by China's microwave-photonic radar breakthroughs that spur counter-investments across India, Japan, and Australia. India's border surveillance network orders multisensor masts every 10 km along the LAC, combining AESA, EO/IR, and passive RF finders. Japan upgrades Aegis destroyers with solid-state S-band arrays to track hypersonic glide vehicles, while South Korea integrates high-pixel-count EO cameras on indigenous MALE drones. Australia's submarine program drives deep-ocean acoustic sensor demand and funds quantum magnetometer research under the AUKUS umbrella. Europe maintains a mature but growing share. Sweden's TPY-4 buy strengthens northern-flank air coverage and sets a procurement template for other mid-sized NATO members. Finland's Nokia-Bittium hybrid network proves commercial-off-the-shelf 5G can harden battlefield links without breaching export-control red lines. Germany's FCAS fighter studies evaluate conformal photonic apertures embedded in composite skins, reflecting continental interest in low-observable sensor integration. The Middle East and Africa show pocket growth, with GCC states procuring counter-drone radars to protect critical infrastructure and African peacekeeping forces equipping patrols with inexpensive day-night cameras.

1. Honeywell International Inc.
2. RTX Corporation
3. Lockheed Martin Corporation
4. THALES Group
5. BAE Systems plc
6. Northrop Grumman Corporation
7. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
8. Leonardo S.p.A
9. Saab AB
10. HENSOLDT AG
11. Elbit Systems Ltd.
12. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
13. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
14. Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
15. TE Connectivity Corporation
16. Headwall Photonics, Inc.
17. Safran SA
18. Crane Aerospace & Electronics (Crane Company)

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Surge in ISR-focused defense budgets
  • 4.2.2 Rapid uptake of UAV-borne miniaturized sensors
  • 4.2.3 Escalating radar deployments along contested borders
  • 4.2.4 AI-enabled multi-sensor fusion for real-time battlespace awareness
  • 4.2.5 Proliferation of near-space platforms demanding space-based sensors
  • 4.2.6 Breakthroughs in quantum sensing unlocking low-observable target detection
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High acquisition and lifecycle costs of next-gen sensor suites
  • 4.3.2 Stringent ITAR/export-control regimes
  • 4.3.3 Rare-earth-dependent RF/EO component supply-chain fragility
  • 4.3.4 RF spectrum congestion limiting sensor architecture scalability
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Sensor Type
  • 5.1.1 Radar Sensors
  • 5.1.2 Electro-Optical/Infra-Red (EO/IR) Sensors
  • 5.1.3 Acoustic (Sonar) Sensors
  • 5.1.4 Magnetic and Seismic Sensors
  • 5.1.5 Chemical, Biological and Radiological Sensors
  • 5.1.6 LiDAR Sensors
  • 5.1.7 MEMS Inertial and Environmental Sensors
• 5.2 By Platform
  • 5.2.1 Airborne
  • 5.2.2 Land
  • 5.2.3 Naval
  • 5.2.4 Space-based
• 5.3 By Application
  • 5.3.1 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
  • 5.3.2 Communication and Navigation
  • 5.3.3 Target Recognition and Fire Control
  • 5.3.4 Electronic Warfare (EW) and Counter-Measures
  • 5.3.5 Command, Control, and Situation Awareness
  • 5.3.6 Integrated Soldier Systems
• 5.4 By Technology
  • 5.4.1 MEMS and Nano-technology Sensors
  • 5.4.2 Photonic and AESA Sensors
  • 5.4.3 AI/Edge-computing-enabled Sensors
  • 5.4.4 Quantum and Cold-atom Sensors
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.2 France
    • 5.5.2.3 Germany
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Russia
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.4.2 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.2 UAE
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Honeywell International Inc.
  • 6.4.2 RTX Corporation
  • 6.4.3 Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • 6.4.4 THALES Group
  • 6.4.5 BAE Systems plc
  • 6.4.6 Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • 6.4.7 L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
  • 6.4.8 Leonardo S.p.A
  • 6.4.9 Saab AB
  • 6.4.10 HENSOLDT AG
  • 6.4.11 Elbit Systems Ltd.
  • 6.4.12 Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
  • 6.4.13 Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
  • 6.4.14 Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
  • 6.4.15 TE Connectivity Corporation
  • 6.4.16 Headwall Photonics, Inc.
  • 6.4.17 Safran SA
  • 6.4.18 Crane Aerospace & Electronics (Crane Company)

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment