구조용 심재 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the structural core materials market size is expected to increase from USD 2.68 billion in 2025 to USD 2.85 billion in 2026 and reach USD 3.93 billion by 2031, and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 6.64% over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Foam (PET Foam, PVC Foam and More), Honeycomb (Aluminum Honeycomb, Nomex Honeycomb, and More), Outer Skin Type (Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) and More), End-Use Industry (Aerospace, Marine, and More), and Geography (Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, South America, and Middle-East and Africa). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Structural Core Materials Market Trends and Insights

Wind Energy Blade Expansion: Sustained Volume Pull for Structural Foam and Honeycomb Cores

Wind energy remains the largest end-use segment in the structural core materials market because modern blade design depends on sandwich structures for stiffness, fatigue resistance, and weight control. Demand is rising as offshore blades grow longer, increasing the amount of core material required per blade even when installation growth is not keeping pace. Material selection within blades is also shifting, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) foam gaining preference in root sections where closed-cell density performance and recyclability align with procurement priorities over traditional natural core options. This is keeping the structural core materials market tied not only to new turbine counts, but also to the growing structural content required in larger platforms. The result is a steadier volume base for foam and honeycomb suppliers that can meet wind Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) requirements on consistency, processing, and sustainability.

Aerospace Weight Reduction: Composite Sandwich Specifications Set a New Structural Baseline

Aerospace demand is supporting the structural core materials market as composite sandwich designs are now embedded in commercial aircraft development rather than treated as specialty solutions. The Airbus A350 XWB incorporated more than 54% composites by structural mass and delivered a 25% fuel consumption reduction compared to equivalent aluminum-airframe aircraft. The Boeing 787 also reached close to 50% composite content by structural mass, reinforcing the same design direction across the next generation of aircraft programs. This keeps demand active for Nomex and aluminum honeycomb in cabin and secondary structures, and for Polymethacrylimide (PMI) foam in applications where low density and dimensional precision are essential. Growth is also broadening beyond legacy airframes, as Evonik is positioning ROHACELL for electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing (eVTOL) applications where low mass and structural efficiency are difficult to achieve with conventional materials.

High Qualification and Certification Costs: A Structural Barrier Protecting Incumbents at the Expense of Pace

High certification costs restrict the pace at which new suppliers can enter the structural core materials market, particularly in aerospace grades where each material system must complete lengthy approval cycles. Industry sources indicate that qualification can take 18 to 36 months for each material and platform combination. Major OEMs also maintain separate approval databases that require parallel documentation and testing. This structure favors incumbent suppliers that can distribute testing and compliance costs across long production programs and established customer relationships. A technically promising new foam or honeycomb product may face slow adoption if the certification pathway remains expensive or fragmented. Toray's NCAMP milestone is relevant in this context because publicly available FAA-accepted design allowables reduce the custom testing required for newer thermoplastic solutions.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Lightweighting Demand for Electric Vehicles and Commercial Transport: A New Volume Tier
2. Shift Toward Recyclable and Thermoplastic Core Materials: Circular Economy Mandates Reshaping Procurement
3. Raw Material Price Volatility: Margin Compression Across Foam and Resin Systems

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Foam held 46.13% of the foam segment in 2025, making it the largest material class in the foam category. This position reflects long-term use in marine hulls, wind blade sections, and transport panels, where machinability, cost, and resistance to dynamic stress support specification. Styrene Acrylonitrile (SAN) Foam sits between PVC and PMI on the performance scale and is used in marine tooling, motorsport, and selected transportation components requiring stronger thermal performance. PMI Foam is the preferred option for aerospace and advanced mobility applications, with Evonik's ROHACELL line supported by a long certification history, low density, and stable behavior under autoclave conditions. The foam segment of the structural core materials market is divided between high-volume incumbent grades and smaller premium formats that are difficult to substitute once qualified.

Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Foam is projected to expand at a 7.23% CAGR through 2031, making it the fastest-growing foam type in the structural core materials market. A 2024 peer-reviewed study found that fully recycled PET foam cores used in glass fiber sandwich panels delivered flexural behavior comparable to PVC-based alternatives, providing scientific support for substitution. PET addresses both mechanical requirements and circular procurement criteria in a single solution. The Other Foam category, including polyurethane and polystyrene grades, remains tied to construction panels, enclosures, and insulation applications where structural demands are lower and cost sensitivity is higher. PET Foam represents the primary growth driver for structural core materials market size through 2031, while PVC continues to define the current revenue base.

Aluminum Honeycomb represented 47.36% of the honeycomb segment in 2025, giving it the largest share in the category. Its position reflects established use in aerospace floor panels, nacelle fairings, and facade systems where crush resistance, dimensional stability, and qualification history make replacement difficult. Nomex Honeycomb remains relevant in aircraft interiors, where flammability compliance supports its role in bins, ceilings, and sidewall panels. Other Honeycomb types, including stainless steel and titanium variants, remain limited to specialized defense and space applications where structural demands exceed what more common alternatives can deliver. The honeycomb segment of the structural core materials market is anchored by mature materials with established qualification records.

Thermoplastic Honeycomb is growing at a 7.83% CAGR through 2031, making it the fastest-growing honeycomb type in the structural core materials market. Its growth is driven by compatibility with recyclable interior systems and processing routes that suit modern manufacturing requirements in certain applications. Composites United highlighted this through EconCore's ThermHexWAVY polyetherimide honeycomb core technology for aircraft interiors, designed to meet fire, smoke, and toxicity requirements while improving out-of-plane buckling resistance through a wavy cell wall geometry. Thermoplastic Honeycomb is now positioned as a technically credible aerospace option alongside its recyclability attributes. Within the honeycomb category, Thermoplastic Honeycomb is the strongest contributor to future growth in the structural core materials market.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Foam
  • PET Foam
  • PVC Foam
  • SAN Foam
  • PMI Foam
  • Other Foam
• By Honeycomb
  • Aluminum Honeycomb
  • Nomex Honeycomb
  • Thermoplastic Honeycomb
  • Other Honeycomb
• By Outer Skin Type
  • Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
  • Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
  • NFRP
  • Other Outer Skin Types
• By End-Use Industry
  • Aerospace
  • Wind Energy
  • Marine
  • Transportation
  • Construction
  • Other End Use Industries
• By Geography
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle-East and Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle-East and Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific accounted for 42.83% of revenue in 2025 and is projected to grow at a 7.12% CAGR through 2031. China is the region's primary demand anchor, as its wind turbine blade manufacturing base absorbs significant foam core volume and supports a broad composite materials supply chain. Japan contributes aerospace content through honeycomb and composite component activity, while South Korea supports demand through commercial shipbuilding applications, where lightweight sandwich panels are used in hull and superstructure design. India represents a smaller but growing source of demand as aerospace manufacturing investment and wind installations expand the need for certified and semi-certified core grades. These factors position Asia-Pacific as the largest regional production and consumption base in the structural core materials market.

North America and Europe form the next major tier of the structural core materials market, each shaped by distinct demand dynamics. North America is anchored by commercial and defense aerospace activity, a network of composite fabricators, and suppliers such as Hexcel with manufacturing operations in the United States. Hexcel reported USD 1.9 billion in 2025 net sales and guided to USD 2.0 billion to USD 2.1 billion for 2026, reflecting confidence in recovering aerospace build rates and continued demand for advanced core materials. Europe is more strongly shaped by regulatory pressure on material sustainability, which is accelerating the adoption of recycled PET foam and thermoplastic honeycomb in wind energy and transportation supply chains. Evonik's shift of ROHACELL production in Darmstadt to 100% renewable electricity in September 2024 illustrates how producers in the region are aligning operations with carbon disclosure and procurement requirements.

South America remains an early-stage part of the structural core materials market, with Brazil offering the clearest demand base through onshore wind development and related blade-material needs. Argentina and neighboring markets contribute more modestly through marine and infrastructure applications that still depend heavily on imported materials and finished panel systems. The Middle East and Africa present an opportunity tied to infrastructure investment, construction activity, and the gradual development of utility-scale renewable energy programs. These regions remain import-dependent, but lightweight sandwich panels may become more attractive where skilled labor is limited and modular construction can reduce site complexity. Regional participation remains limited, but these markets represent a growth layer expected to become more relevant later in the forecast period.

1. 3A Composites GmbH (SCHWEITER TECHNOLOGIES AG)
2. Armacell International S.A.
3. Carbon-Core Corp.
4. Changzhou Tiansheng New Materials Co., Ltd.
5. Diab Group
6. EconCore N.V.
7. Euro-Composites S.A.
8. Evonik Industries AG
9. Gurit Services AG
10. Hexcel Corporation
11. Maricell S.r.l.
12. NGM Europe S.r.l.
13. Plascore, Inc.
14. Polyumac USA, Inc.
15. Showa Aircraft Industry Co., Ltd.
16. The Gill Corporation

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Wind Energy Blade Upscaling Requires Lightweight Structural Cores
  • 4.2.2 Aerospace Weight Reduction Priorities Sustain High-Spec Core Demand
  • 4.2.3 Shift Toward Recyclable PET and Bio-Based Core Materials
  • 4.2.4 Rising demand for lightweight composite structures
  • 4.2.5 Modular Construction and Sandwich Panels Expand Structural Core Use
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Qualification Cost in Aerospace and Wind Applications
  • 4.3.2 Volatility in polymer and aluminum raw material prices
  • 4.3.3 Limited recyclability of certain thermoset composite systems
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.5.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Foam
  • 5.1.1 PET Foam
  • 5.1.2 PVC Foam
  • 5.1.3 SAN Foam
  • 5.1.4 PMI Foam
  • 5.1.5 Other Foam
• 5.2 By Honeycomb
  • 5.2.1 Aluminum Honeycomb
  • 5.2.2 Nomex Honeycomb
  • 5.2.3 Thermoplastic Honeycomb
  • 5.2.4 Other Honeycomb
• 5.3 By Outer Skin Type
  • 5.3.1 Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
  • 5.3.2 Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
  • 5.3.3 NFRP
  • 5.3.4 Other Outer Skin Types
• 5.4 By End-Use Industry
  • 5.4.1 Aerospace
  • 5.4.2 Wind Energy
  • 5.4.3 Marine
  • 5.4.4 Transportation
  • 5.4.5 Construction
  • 5.4.6 Other End Use Industries
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.1.1 China
    • 5.5.1.2 India
    • 5.5.1.3 Japan
    • 5.5.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.1.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.2 North America
    • 5.5.2.1 United States
    • 5.5.2.2 Canada
    • 5.5.2.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Russia
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.5 Middle-East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share (%)/Ranking Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Overview, Market Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 3A Composites GmbH (SCHWEITER TECHNOLOGIES AG)
  • 6.4.2 Armacell International S.A.
  • 6.4.3 Carbon-Core Corp.
  • 6.4.4 Changzhou Tiansheng New Materials Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.5 Diab Group
  • 6.4.6 EconCore N.V.
  • 6.4.7 Euro-Composites S.A.
  • 6.4.8 Evonik Industries AG
  • 6.4.9 Gurit Services AG
  • 6.4.10 Hexcel Corporation
  • 6.4.11 Maricell S.r.l.
  • 6.4.12 NGM Europe S.r.l.
  • 6.4.13 Plascore, Inc.
  • 6.4.14 Polyumac USA, Inc.
  • 6.4.15 Showa Aircraft Industry Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.16 The Gill Corporation

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment