배기가스 세정기 폐수 처리 시스템 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market size was valued at USD 1.94 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 2.04 billion in 2026 to reach USD 2.69 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 5.71% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Scrubber Type (Semi-Dry Scrubber Systems and More), Treatment Technology (Physical and Chemical Treatment and More), Contaminant Type (Chlorides and Sulfates and More), End-User Industry (Coal-Fired Power Plants and More), and Geography (Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Flue Gas Scrubber Wastewater Treatment Systems Market Trends and Insights

Tightening Zero-Discharge and Toxic-Metal Limits

The U.S. EPA's 2024 Final Rule, which took effect on July 8, 2024, requires complete pollutant elimination from FGD wastewater through membrane filtration, spray-dry evaporation, or thermal treatment. The rule sets limits of 29 µg/L for selenium and 34 ng/L for mercury as a 30-day average. These limits make conventional chemical precipitation inadequate for many sites and increase demand for multi-stage treatment. The EPA's December 2025 extension moved the compliance deadline to December 31, 2034, replacing an immediate capital requirement with a longer project planning period. China's current standard establishes parallel design and acceptance requirements for zero-discharge desulfurization wastewater systems. Together, these requirements narrow the range of acceptable technologies and support demand for established vendors in the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market.

Expansion of Dedicated FGD Wastewater Treatment Facilities

FGD blowdown contains 20,000-60,000 mg/L of chlorides, suspended solids above 13,000 mg/L, and heavy metals that vary with coal source. These conditions can overwhelm a central plant wastewater system and prompt the use of purpose-built treatment facilities. Georgia Power completed construction of a dedicated FGD wastewater system at Plant Bowen, with optimization underway by September 2025. The project combines physical and chemical treatment for arsenic and mercury with biological treatment for selenium and nitrate-nitrite removal. Stantec's Winyah Generating Station project included a 200,000-square-foot, two-story facility with ultrafiltration, chemical storage, dosing systems, and filter presses. Such facilities can generate longer operations and maintenance contracts because environmental liabilities remain after a unit closes, supporting recurring revenue in the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market.

High Thermal-Evaporation Energy and Lifecycle Cost

Thermal zero-liquid-discharge systems, including brine concentrators, forced-circulation crystallizers, and spray-dry evaporators, consume 7 kWh/m3 to 12 kWh/m3 of treated FGD wastewater. Membrane-based zero-liquid-discharge systems consume 3 kWh/m3 to 6 kWh/m3, giving membrane-based configurations an energy-cost advantage. This difference is significant in regions with high electricity prices or carbon costs. Full zero-liquid-discharge capital expenditure has increased by 48% since 2016, limiting affordability for smaller facilities and municipal waste-to-energy sites. Waste-heat integration can reduce this burden but does not eliminate the underlying energy requirement. This cost constraint slows adoption in the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market, particularly where discharge requirements are less strict or project budgets are limited.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Retrofitting of Aging Coal-Fired Units
2. Water Reuse Pressure in Water-Stressed Power Clusters
3. Corrosion, Scaling, and High-Chloride Reliability Risk

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems held 65.42% of the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market share in 2025. Their installed base consists of long-running limestone-gypsum systems that produce continuous wastewater blowdown under normal operating conditions. Wet FGD was the reference utility-scale flue gas treatment technology in 2025, with Andritz, Doosan Lentjes, Babcock & Wilcox, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and GEA among its suppliers. The market size associated with wet systems is therefore linked mainly to upgrades of an existing fleet, rather than to new installations alone.

Dry scrubber systems are forecast to record the highest growth at a 6.34% CAGR through 2031. They are gaining relevance at units below 100 MW, where wet FGD capital costs of USD 1,330/kW can make dry alternatives more attractive. Dry systems produce a solid byproduct and do not require a dedicated wastewater treatment facility, while semi-dry and multi-pollutant systems continue to play a role in Europe and Japan. Wider dry adoption could reduce the long-term wastewater treatment base, even though wet FGD continues to determine near-term demand.

Physical and chemical treatment captured 36.87% of the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market share in 2025. Lime softening, iron co-precipitation, and coagulation-flocculation provide common first-stage treatment for solids and selected dissolved contaminants. Their USD 4/ton to USD 6/ton operating cost supports use where operators do not face zero-discharge requirements. These methods also remain important upstream steps in larger membrane and thermal treatment trains.

Evaporation and crystallization systems are forecast to grow at a 6.12% CAGR through 2031. Zero-discharge rules require operators to manage the residual brine after partial treatment, thereby supporting this technology category. A 2025 review reported up to 94% water recovery for hybrid reverse-osmosis and forced-circulation crystallizer systems, and 89% recovery with 99.7% ion removal for forward-osmosis and membrane-distillation systems. Aquatech's Taean project achieved near-100% water recovery and reduced operating expenditure by more than 20%, while membrane and biological systems support pre-concentration and the removal of selenium or nitrate.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Scrubber Type
  • Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
  • Semi-Dry Scrubber Systems
  • Dry Scrubber Systems
  • Others (Multi-Pollutant Scrubber Systems)
• By Treatment Technology
  • Physical and Chemical Treatment
  • Membrane Filtration Systems
  • Evaporation and Crystallization Systems
  • Biological Treatment Systems
  • Others (Zero Liquid Discharge Systems)
• By Contaminant Type
  • Heavy Metals (Mercury, Selenium, Arsenic)
  • Chlorides and Sulfates
  • Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
  • Others (Nitrates, Ammonia, Mixed Contaminants)
• By End-User Industry
  • Coal-Fired Power Plants
  • Waste-to-Energy Plants
  • Cement Plants
  • Metals and Mining
  • Others (Chemicals, Petrochemicals and Marine Scrubber Applications)
• By Geography
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle-East and Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle-East and Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific held 43.18% of the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market share in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 6.47% CAGR through 2031. China's zero-discharge standard defines treatment-system design and acceptance requirements across thermal power plants. This framework supports regional demand for systems designed for reuse, brine management, and solidification. South Korea remains a premium technology market for large treatment projects. Aquatech's 60 m3/h zero-liquid-discharge system at the 6.1 GW Taean station achieved near-100% commercial water recovery.

North America is the second-largest regional market, supported by compliance requirements at more than 127 wet-flue-gas-desulfurization (FGD)-equipped U.S. coal units. Plant Bowen optimized its dedicated FGD wastewater system by September 2025. The 200,000-square-foot Winyah facility illustrates the scale of the region's dedicated treatment infrastructure. The EPA's extension converts a short compliance cycle into a longer capital program through 2034. The EIA reported that only 2.6 GW of coal capacity retired in 2025, despite 8.5 GW planned at the beginning of that year.

Europe maintains stable treatment demand, driven by phased coal exit plans and requirements under the Industrial Emissions Directive. Germany's 2038 target leaves operating units subject to permit and waste-management conditions, while Poland and the Czech Republic sustain compliance spending. Veolia's USD 500 million industrial-water contract for the Saudi Aramco Total Refining and Petrochemical Company (SATORP) complex in Jubail reflects the scale of industrial-water investment in the Middle-East. Brazil's waste-to-energy pipeline and South Africa's coal-heavy generation fleet offer selective opportunities in the flue gas scrubber wastewater treatment systems market.

1. Andritz
2. Aquatech
3. Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
4. CECO ENVIRONMENTAL
5. Chiyoda Corporation
6. Doosan Enerbility
7. Ducon Infratechnologies Ltd.
8. GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
9. Hitachi Zosen Inova AG
10. Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
11. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
12. SUEZ
13. Thermax Limited
14. Veolia
15. Xylem

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Tightening Zero-Discharge and Toxic-Metal Limits
  • 4.2.2 Expansion of Dedicated FGD Wastewater Treatment Facilities
  • 4.2.3 Retrofitting of Aging Coal-Fired Units
  • 4.2.4 Water Reuse Pressure in Water-Stressed Power Clusters
  • 4.2.5 Modular Biological Removal of Selenium and Nitrates
  • 4.2.6 Brownfield Integration With Ash-Pond and Legacy-Wastewater Remediation
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Thermal-Evaporation Energy and Lifecycle Cost
  • 4.3.2 Corrosion, Scaling, and High-Chloride Reliability Risk
  • 4.3.3 Coal-Fleet Retirement and FGD Stranded-Asset Risk
  • 4.3.4 Shortage of Site-Specific Treatability Data and Skilled Operators
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.5.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Scrubber Type
  • 5.1.1 Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
  • 5.1.2 Semi-Dry Scrubber Systems
  • 5.1.3 Dry Scrubber Systems
  • 5.1.4 Others (Multi-Pollutant Scrubber Systems)
• 5.2 By Treatment Technology
  • 5.2.1 Physical and Chemical Treatment
  • 5.2.2 Membrane Filtration Systems
  • 5.2.3 Evaporation and Crystallization Systems
  • 5.2.4 Biological Treatment Systems
  • 5.2.5 Others (Zero Liquid Discharge Systems)
• 5.3 By Contaminant Type
  • 5.3.1 Heavy Metals (Mercury, Selenium, Arsenic)
  • 5.3.2 Chlorides and Sulfates
  • 5.3.3 Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
  • 5.3.4 Others (Nitrates, Ammonia, Mixed Contaminants)
• 5.4 By End-User Industry
  • 5.4.1 Coal-Fired Power Plants
  • 5.4.2 Waste-to-Energy Plants
  • 5.4.3 Cement Plants
  • 5.4.4 Metals and Mining
  • 5.4.5 Others (Chemicals, Petrochemicals and Marine Scrubber Applications)
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.1.1 China
    • 5.5.1.2 India
    • 5.5.1.3 Japan
    • 5.5.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.1.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.2 North America
    • 5.5.2.1 United States
    • 5.5.2.2 Canada
    • 5.5.2.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.5 Middle-East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share (%)/Ranking Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Overview, Market Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Andritz
  • 6.4.2 Aquatech
  • 6.4.3 Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
  • 6.4.4 CECO ENVIRONMENTAL
  • 6.4.5 Chiyoda Corporation
  • 6.4.6 Doosan Enerbility
  • 6.4.7 Ducon Infratechnologies Ltd.
  • 6.4.8 GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
  • 6.4.9 Hitachi Zosen Inova AG
  • 6.4.10 Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
  • 6.4.11 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
  • 6.4.12 SUEZ
  • 6.4.13 Thermax Limited
  • 6.4.14 Veolia
  • 6.4.15 Xylem

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment