케이블 상륙 기지 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the cable landing station market size is projected to be USD 4.21 billion in 2025, USD 4.48 billion in 2026, and reach USD 6.23 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 6.82% from 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Component (Power Feeding Equipment, Submarine Line Terminal Equipment, Monitoring and Control Equipment, Protection Equipment, and More), Service (Upgrades and Retrofits, and More), Application (Inter-Country and Island Connection, and More), Ownership and Business Model (Single-Owner Systems, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Cable Landing Station Market Trends and Insights

Cloud and AI Traffic Driving New International Capacity

Artificial intelligence inference requires low latency and recurring transfers of large model files between locations. Used international bandwidth is projected to grow at a 24% annual rate from 2025 through 2035, which requires continued investment in long-haul capacity rather than isolated network upgrades. Higher traffic density raises the need for optical monitoring at coastal facilities. Operators also need dependable power, cooling, and backhaul links when they increase port capacity. The cable landing station market benefits because each new route must connect to a protected site with terrestrial network access. Demand is especially relevant where cloud regions need direct links across the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Ocean basins.

Hyperscaler Investment in Single-Owner Submarine Systems

Large technology companies increasingly favor routes that give them control over capacity, routing, and network design. Meta announced Project Waterworth in 2025 as a 50,000-km, five-continent cable system that it would own, which illustrates this direction. Amazon announced Fastnet in 2025, a cable linking Maryland and County Cork with more than 320 terabits per second of capacity. These projects require stations capable of accommodating private optical systems and dedicated terrestrial connections. Host operators can capture service revenue by modifying power, physical layout, and optical distribution frames in private systems. This ownership model supports growth in single-owner deployments and in retrofit work at existing facilities.

Coastal Permitting and Environmental Review Delays

Environmental review and local approvals can delay a cable landing project for years. Each route requires approvals from multiple authorities, and its commercial operation may depend on all planned landing points being ready. The United States House of Representatives passed the Undersea Cable Protection Act in 2025 to remove a duplicative special-use permit requirement under the National Marine Sanctuary Act. The measure addresses a specific approval step but does not remove broader coastal, environmental, and community review requirements. Delays can leave completed marine portions of a system waiting for a single unready site. This uncertainty increases development risk for the cable landing station market, particularly in coastal areas with strict review processes.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. National Digital Sovereignty and Critical Infrastructure Spending
2. Carrier-Neutral Landing Station Expansion in Emerging Corridors
3. Cybersecurity and Physical-Security Compliance Costs

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Submarine Line Terminal Equipment held 32.51% of the cable landing station market share in 2025. It converts traffic between submarine and terrestrial systems, making it central to every high-capacity cable termination. Its role results in a significant equipment requirement whenever operators develop a new landing point. Nokia supplied Submarine Line Terminal Equipment for the Bangladesh Private Cable System, a project with a total investment of USD 150 million. Buyers assess capacity, energy use, equipment interoperability, and security when they select these systems. The installed base also requires periodic replacement as optical standards advance.

Monitoring and Control Equipment is projected to expand at a 7.46% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. Operators need continuous visibility into optical performance as fiber-pair counts and wavelength capacity rise. Monitoring can identify degraded performance before it creates a larger service issue. Power Feeding Equipment and Protection Equipment support the electrical and physical integrity of the landing installation. Many facilities date from earlier fiber deployments, so existing systems may not have been designed for current coherent optical technologies. The International Telecommunication Union noted in 2026 that changing environmental pressures affect the resilience of cables and coastal infrastructure. This replacement need supports component demand during both expansion and slower new-build periods. It also gives equipment suppliers recurring opportunities to improve automation, fault visibility, energy management, and compatibility with new optical systems. Station owners can use these upgrades to extend the useful life of protected coastal facilities without rebuilding the entire site.

Installation and Commissioning held 43.26% of the cable landing station market share in 2025. The service includes beach-joint work, cable burial, optical alignment, testing, and the final integration of station equipment. These activities require specialized engineering and coordination with the marine cable contractor. Cables due to enter service from 2026 to 2029 exceed USD 16 billion in value, supporting the current installation pipeline. NEC served as system integrator for the Candle system, covering manufacturing, route design, installation, and testing. Turnkey contracts can reduce coordination risk for cable owners who need a single accountable delivery partner.

Upgrades and Retrofits are projected to expand at a 8.15% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. Existing sites need more optical capacity, additional power management, and room for private systems owned by large technology companies. Maintenance and Support contracts also become more valuable when operators require continuous performance oversight. Design and engineering are becoming more complex at carrier-neutral sites because developers must reserve conduits, power capacity, and frame space for future cables. Modular construction can shorten the on-site work required for a new facility. These service needs allow the cable landing station industry to generate activity from operating sites as well as from new landings. Service providers that understand local construction rules and optical integration can support customers throughout design, commissioning, maintenance, expansion, and incident response. That broader service role can be important in regions with limited specialist capacity.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Component
  • Power Feeding Equipment
  • Submarine Line Terminal Equipment
  • Monitoring and Control Equipment
  • Protection Equipment
  • Other Components
• By Service
  • Design and Engineering
  • Installation and Commissioning
  • Maintenance and Support
  • Upgrades and Retrofits
• By Application
  • Telecommunications and Internet Backbone
  • Hyperscale and Data Center Interconnection
  • Government and Defense Connectivity
  • Offshore Energy and Industrial Connectivity
  • Inter-Country and Island Connection
• By Ownership and Business Model
  • Consortium-Owned Systems
  • Single-Owner Systems
  • Carrier-Neutral Landing-Party Model
  • Government and Development-Bank-Backed Systems
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Qatar
    • Rest of Middle East
  • Africa
    • South Africa
    • Egypt
    • Nigeria
    • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific held 38.63% of the cable landing station market share in 2025. The region combines large internet populations, dense intra-Asian traffic, and major transpacific routes. New Asian cable investment is expected to exceed USD 3.7 billion during 2026-2029. Japan's location-diversification program selected SoftBank to establish new cable landing stations in Hokkaido and Kyushu in 2025. India, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines provide additional sources of route development. The cable landing station market in Asia-Pacific is supported by commercial cloud demand and public resilience programs.

The Middle East is projected to expand at a 8.37% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. Its location between Asian, European, and African cable routes supports its role as a transit region. Mobily landed the Africa-1 cable in Dubai, Saudi Arabia, in 2025. The 10,000-km system has 8 fiber pairs and 11 landing points. Egypt added SEA-ME-WE-6 landing infrastructure at Port Said and Ras Ghareb. Diversified sites along the Red Sea and Mediterranean improve route options for operators serving east-west traffic. North America reflects demand for private facilities used by hyperscalers. Amazon selected a Maryland landing location for Fastnet, while its cable will connect the United States and Ireland.

Europe is directing EUR 347 million (USD 381 million) toward cable security and priority projects through 2027. Africa can gain from carrier-neutral facilities that lower the cost of entering Atlantic routes. South America has scope for modular installations and new links to Asia-Pacific. The cable landing station market across these regions depends on local permitting, grid access, coastal security, and resilient terrestrial backhaul. Local development conditions can be as important as the physical route because a cable cannot deliver capacity until its station and terrestrial links are ready. Developers that secure these requirements early can reduce the risk of delays after marine construction begins.

1. Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS
2. SubCom, LLC
3. Huawei Marine Networks Co., Ltd.
4. NEC Corporation
5. Fujitsu Limited
6. Nokia Corporation
7. Ciena Corporation
8. Xtera Limited
9. Global Marine Systems Limited
10. Prysmian S.p.A.
11. Nexans S.A.
12. Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
13. Hengtong Optic-Electric Co., Ltd.
14. ZTT International Limited
15. LS Cable & System Ltd.
16. TE Connectivity Ltd.
17. Corning Incorporated
18. Infinera Corporation
19. ZTE Corporation
20. Elettra Tlc S.p.A.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Cloud and AI Traffic Driving New International Capacity
  • 4.2.2 Hyperscaler Investment in Single-Owner Submarine Systems
  • 4.2.3 Carrier-Neutral Landing Station Expansion in Emerging Corridors
  • 4.2.4 Offshore Energy and Island Connectivity Requirements
  • 4.2.5 National Digital Sovereignty and Critical-Infrastructure Spending
  • 4.2.6 Modular and Prefabricated Landing Station Deployment
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Coastal Permitting and Environmental Review Delays
  • 4.3.2 Cable Repair Vessel and Specialized Workforce Constraints
  • 4.3.3 Concentrated Landing-Point and Backhaul Failure Exposure
  • 4.3.4 Cybersecurity and Physical-Security Compliance Costs
• 4.4 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.5 Industry Ecosystem Analysis
• 4.6 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.7 Technological Outlook
• 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.8.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.8.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.8.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Component
  • 5.1.1 Power Feeding Equipment
  • 5.1.2 Submarine Line Terminal Equipment
  • 5.1.3 Monitoring and Control Equipment
  • 5.1.4 Protection Equipment
  • 5.1.5 Other Components
• 5.2 By Service
  • 5.2.1 Design and Engineering
  • 5.2.2 Installation and Commissioning
  • 5.2.3 Maintenance and Support
  • 5.2.4 Upgrades and Retrofits
• 5.3 By Application
  • 5.3.1 Telecommunications and Internet Backbone
  • 5.3.2 Hyperscale and Data Center Interconnection
  • 5.3.3 Government and Defense Connectivity
  • 5.3.4 Offshore Energy and Industrial Connectivity
  • 5.3.5 Inter-Country and Island Connection
• 5.4 By Ownership and Business Model
  • 5.4.1 Consortium-Owned Systems
  • 5.4.2 Single-Owner Systems
  • 5.4.3 Carrier-Neutral Landing-Party Model
  • 5.4.4 Government and Development-Bank-Backed Systems
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Chile
    • 5.5.2.4 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.3 Qatar
    • 5.5.5.4 Rest of Middle East
  • 5.5.6 Africa
    • 5.5.6.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.6.2 Egypt
    • 5.5.6.3 Nigeria
    • 5.5.6.4 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Alcatel Submarine Networks SAS
  • 6.4.2 SubCom, LLC
  • 6.4.3 Huawei Marine Networks Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.4 NEC Corporation
  • 6.4.5 Fujitsu Limited
  • 6.4.6 Nokia Corporation
  • 6.4.7 Ciena Corporation
  • 6.4.8 Xtera Limited
  • 6.4.9 Global Marine Systems Limited
  • 6.4.10 Prysmian S.p.A.
  • 6.4.11 Nexans S.A.
  • 6.4.12 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
  • 6.4.13 Hengtong Optic-Electric Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.14 ZTT International Limited
  • 6.4.15 LS Cable & System Ltd.
  • 6.4.16 TE Connectivity Ltd.
  • 6.4.17 Corning Incorporated
  • 6.4.18 Infinera Corporation
  • 6.4.19 ZTE Corporation
  • 6.4.20 Elettra Tlc S.p.A.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment