복합재 수리 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the composite repair market size is projected to be USD 15.34 billion in 2025, USD 16.39 billion in 2026, and reach USD 22.82 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 6.85% from 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Material Type (Carbon-Fibre Reinforced Polymer, Glass-Fibre Reinforced Polymer, and More), Product Type (Structural, Semi-Structural, and Cosmetic), Repair Process (Hand Lay-Up, Vacuum Infusion, and More), End-User Industry (Aerospace and Defense, Wind Energy, Automotive, and More), and Geography (Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, South America, and Middle-East and Africa).

Global Composite Repair Market Trends and Insights

Surging Investment in Aging-Asset Life-Extension Programs

Operators are redirecting capital from new builds to life-extension projects as replacement lead times stretch beyond two years and regulatory hurdles tighten. The U.S. Department of Energy earmarked USD 1.2 billion in 2025 for composite wrapping of nuclear-plant cooling-water piping, enabling upgrades without reactor shutdowns. Gulf of Mexico oil platforms commissioned in the 1980s now employ glass-fiber overwraps that extend riser life by up to 20 years at one-third the steel-replacement cost. TD Williamson secured multi-year subsea pipeline contracts from Chevron and Shell after expanding its composite division in 2024. Europe mirrors the trend: North Sea operators doubled composite integrity spending to EUR 800 million in 2025, evidence that composite repair preserves cash flow while deferring the environmental scrutiny triggered by new construction approvals.

Cost Advantages of On-Site Composite Repair Versus Metallic Part Replacement

Field repair economics favor composites by a wide margin. Lufthansa Technik quantified that on-wing repair of a Boeing 777 composite radome costs USD 35,000 over 48 hours, whereas replacement is USD 120,000 and grounds the jet for seven days, causing USD 200,000 revenue loss. Wind-farm operators echo these savings: in-situ repair of a 90-meter blade costs USD 80,000, compared with USD 250,000 for depot work and two-week generation loss. HAECO's mobile repair units trimmed narrow-body turnaround from five days to 18 hours at Asia-Pacific airports in 2025, illustrating how time-value benefits amplify direct cost savings.

Emergence of Self-Healing Composite Laminates

Self-healing resin systems are moving from labs to limited commercial trials. Oak Ridge National Laboratory licensed a thermoplastic healing system to automotive suppliers in 2025, enabling EV battery enclosures to self-repair micro-cracks and is forecast to cut cosmetic repair volume by up to 20% within five years. CompPair HealTech closed EUR 12 million funding in 2024 to pilot bio-inspired resins for wind-blade trailing edges, targeting a 2027 rollout. Aerospace certification will lag, but widespread adoption in automotive and wind could erode low-margin cosmetic repair demand.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Increasing Use of Composites in the Aerospace and Defense Industry
2. Offshore Wind Blade Length Growth Demanding In-Situ Repair Capability
3. Scarcity of Certified Composite Repair Technicians

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

The Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) accounts for 54.69% of global revenue in 2025. Boeing 787 fuselage delamination alone generated USD 420 million in CFRP repair orders that year, underscoring the segment's scale. Glass-fiber retains the cost-sensitive mid-market, and the U.S. Navy's USD 28 million GFRP superstructure repair program on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers highlights its defense relevance. Hybrid and natural-fiber systems remain niche but gain traction in infrastructure rehabilitation as environmental rules tighten.

Aramid composites occupy a swiftly growing niche. Hydrogen pipeline operators favor aramid-fibre composites that resist cryogenic embrittlement, driving a 7.85% CAGR through 2031. Ballistic-protection retrofits for military vehicles add further pull. Regulatory specificity also shapes share: FAA AC 43-214A restricts cosmetic CFRP repairs to OEM-approved materials, effectively locking lower-cost substitutes out and anchoring CFRP's position. Taken together, CFRP keeps numerical leadership, yet aramid's high-value opportunities and regulatory loopholes present outsized upside relative to scale.

Structural generated 44.71% of 2025 value because downtime risk and certification requirements allow premiums. A composite wing-to-body fairing repair on a Boeing 777 can fetch USD 180,000, contrasting with USD 12,000 for an equivalent cosmetic fix. Semi-structural repairs, such as wind-blade trailing-edge treatments, grew as offshore turbine operators favored repair over replacement.

Cosmetic work is the fastest segment at 7.71% CAGR through 2031 but faces long-run headwinds from self-healing materials. Oak Ridge National Laboratory's licensed thermoplastic system could trim cosmetic volumes by up to 20% inside five years. Still, near-term growth is fueled by electric-vehicle adoption: collision centers now handle CFRP battery enclosures that require certified technicians and rapid-cure epoxies. Crawford Composites developed a vacuum-infusion kit that field teams use without autoclaves, capturing semi-structural contracts across U.S. wind farms.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Material Type
  • Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
  • Glass-fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
  • Aramid-fibre Composites
  • Hybrid and Other Fibres
• By Product Type
  • Structural
  • Semi-structural
  • Cosmetic
• By Repair Process
  • Hand Lay-up
  • Vacuum Infusion
  • Autoclave
  • Other Processes
• By End-user Industry
  • Aerospace and Defense
  • Wind Energy
  • Automotive
  • Marine
  • Construction
  • Other End-user Industries
• By Geography
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • ASEAN Countries
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • NORDIC Countries
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle-East and Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle-East and Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific generated 38.54% of 2025 revenue for the composite repair market and is forecast to grow at 8.29% through 2031. COMAC C919 composite checks, Toray's 20% carbon-fiber capacity expansion, and India's 5 GW of wind-power additions in 2025 underpin multi-segment demand. HAECO's USD 85 million Singapore repair center exemplifies regional capacity build-out, while South Korea's frigate program embeds composite superstructures requiring long-term service infrastructure.

North America's demand is driven by U.S. aerospace MRO concentration and wind-farm expansion across the Great Plains and Atlantic Coast. The Department of Energy's 2024 roadmap funded mobile blade-repair training, and TD Williamson's CAD 120 million Canadian pipeline contracts show industrial adoption beyond aerospace. Technician shortages, however, push overflow work to Mexican hubs where labor supply is more elastic though regulatory limits confine scope to non-primary structures.

Europe's share is anchored by Lufthansa Technik's mobile autoclave trailer and the United Kingdom's 15 GW offshore wind capacity that produced GBP 480 million in blade repairs during 2025. Germany's EV battery-enclosure adoption brings new collision-repair volume, and Sika's flax-fiber system supports bridge-strengthening contracts across Germany and France. South America, the Middle East, and Africa contribute the lower share, led by Brazil's wind build-out and Saudi pipeline retrofits that employ composite wraps for Vision 2030 infrastructure objectives.

1. 3M
2. Advanced FRP Systems
3. Belzona International Ltd.
4. Boeing
5. Composite Technology Inc.
6. Crawford Composites LLC
7. DIAB Group
8. Gurit Holding AG
9. HAECO Group
10. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
11. Hexcel Corporation
12. Lufthansa Technik
13. ResinTech Inc.
14. Sika AG
15. TD Williamson Inc.
16. TEAM, Inc.
17. Toray Advanced Composites
18. WR Composites

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Surging Investment in Ageing-Asset Life-Extension Programs
  • 4.2.2 Cost Advantages of On-Site Composite Repair Versus Metallic Part Replacement
  • 4.2.3 Increasing Use of Composites in the Aerospace and Defense Industry
  • 4.2.4 Offshore Wind-Blade Length Growth Demanding In-Situ Repair Capability
  • 4.2.5 Hydrogen Pipeline Retrofits Needing Non-Metallic Reinforcement
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Emergence of Self-Healing Composite Laminates
  • 4.3.2 Scarcity of Certified Composite Repair Technicians
  • 4.3.3 Lack of Harmonised Repair Codes for Subsea Composite Pipelines
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Porter's Five Forces
  • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Material Type
  • 5.1.1 Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
  • 5.1.2 Glass-fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
  • 5.1.3 Aramid-fibre Composites
  • 5.1.4 Hybrid and Other Fibres
• 5.2 By Product Type
  • 5.2.1 Structural
  • 5.2.2 Semi-structural
  • 5.2.3 Cosmetic
• 5.3 By Repair Process
  • 5.3.1 Hand Lay-up
  • 5.3.2 Vacuum Infusion
  • 5.3.3 Autoclave
  • 5.3.4 Other Processes
• 5.4 By End-user Industry
  • 5.4.1 Aerospace and Defense
  • 5.4.2 Wind Energy
  • 5.4.3 Automotive
  • 5.4.4 Marine
  • 5.4.5 Construction
  • 5.4.6 Other End-user Industries
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.1.1 China
    • 5.5.1.2 Japan
    • 5.5.1.3 India
    • 5.5.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.1.5 ASEAN Countries
    • 5.5.1.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.2 North America
    • 5.5.2.1 United States
    • 5.5.2.2 Canada
    • 5.5.2.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 NORDIC Countries
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.5 Middle-East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share(%)/Ranking Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 3M
  • 6.4.2 Advanced FRP Systems
  • 6.4.3 Belzona International Ltd.
  • 6.4.4 Boeing
  • 6.4.5 Composite Technology Inc.
  • 6.4.6 Crawford Composites LLC
  • 6.4.7 DIAB Group
  • 6.4.8 Gurit Holding AG
  • 6.4.9 HAECO Group
  • 6.4.10 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
  • 6.4.11 Hexcel Corporation
  • 6.4.12 Lufthansa Technik
  • 6.4.13 ResinTech Inc.
  • 6.4.14 Sika AG
  • 6.4.15 TD Williamson Inc.
  • 6.4.16 TEAM, Inc.
  • 6.4.17 Toray Advanced Composites
  • 6.4.18 WR Composites

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment
• 7.2 Automation of Composite Repair