엘라스토그래피 이미징 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, elastography imaging market size in 2026 is estimated at USD 5.07 billion, growing from 2025 value of USD 4.77 billion with 2031 projections showing USD 6.88 billion, growing at 6.30% CAGR over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Modality (Ultrasound Elastography, and More), Technology Type (Strain Elastography, and More), Imaging Technique (2-D Imaging, 3-D/4-D Imaging), Portability (Trolley-Based Systems, Portable Systems), Application (Radiology, and More), End-User (Hospitals, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Elastography Imaging Market Trends and Insights

Rising incidence of chronic diseases & breast cancer

Escalating metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease prevalence drives routine liver stiffness measurement adoption, where two-dimensional shear-wave elastography achieves 94% accuracy at a 14.4 kPa cutoff . Combining ultrasound-guided attenuation parameters with shear-wave data stratifies MASLD patients by life-threatening event risk. Breast elastography now supports dense-breast screening, distinguishing malignant microcalcifications with 88% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity at a 62 kPa threshold. Growing oncology adoption bolsters equipment utilization in radiology suites. The dual-organ demand profile solidifies elastography as a preferred non-invasive alternative to biopsy.

Shift toward minimally invasive surgeries

Shear-wave elastography predicts rotator-cuff tendon quality before repair, enabling surgeons to tailor operative strategy more accurately. Robotic systems incorporate 3-D ARFI imaging to guide prostate procedures with agreement levels comparable to multiparametric MRI. AI-enhanced elastography automatically pinpoints biopsy targets, lowering sampling errors and procedure times. Strategic acquisitions, such as Hologic's USD 350 million Sonata buy-out, highlight the commercial appeal of ultrasound-guided, fibroid-specific minimally invasive platforms. The technology's intraoperative role is widening from liver to musculoskeletal and gynecological interventions.

Unfavorable reimbursement frameworks

Medicare restricts CPT 76981/76982 coverage to advanced hepatic fibrosis in defined chronic liver diseases, limiting broader screening uses. Aetna deems elastography investigational outside liver applications, stalling cardiology and musculoskeletal reimbursement. Prior-authorization hurdles lengthen administrative cycles and discourage routine ordering. The absence of standardized payment for cardiac elastography delays guideline endorsements. Evidence-based coverage expansions are expected only after large-scale outcome studies demonstrate cost savings.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Adoption of elastography for NASH-related fibrosis staging
2. AI-enabled point-of-care ultrasound elastography
3. High capital cost of MRI-based systems

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Ultrasound elastography captured 62.30% revenue in 2025, reflecting superior workflow integration and lower cost relative to MR platforms. That share equates to USD 2.97 billion of the elastography imaging market size in 2025. MR elastography advances at a 7.19% CAGR, underpinned by gold-standard accuracy for fibrosis staging, but uptake is limited to tertiary centers due to high acquisition costs. Continuous R&D delivers conformable ultrasound electronics for non-planar monitoring, while AI automation enhances repeatability across operator skill levels.

MR elastography's precision sustains demand in complex hepatology practices, yet capital barriers spur hybrid purchasing strategies where ultrasound handles routine follow-up and MR is reserved for equivocal cases. Equipment vendors integrate AI reconstruction to shorten MR scan times and reduce per-exam cost. The balancing act between clinical gold-standard status and economic realities shapes long-term modality mix.

Shear-wave techniques represented 45.10% of 2025 sales, underlining their quantitative advantage and lower operator bias. Strain elastography's 7.55% CAGR owes to software upgrades that convert existing scanners at minimal cost-a value proposition compelling in community hospitals. The elastography imaging market share leadership of shear-wave is reinforced by guideline endorsements for liver fibrosis and thyroid nodule assessment.

Transient elastography holds a niche in NASH monitoring, whereas ARFI benefits interventional radiology by providing real-time stiffness cues during needle placement. Hybrid solutions that fuse shear-wave with ARFI emerge to satisfy oncology procedural guidance. Diagnostic performance gains from machine-learning-based stiffness estimation continue to blur boundaries among technology types.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Modality
  • Ultrasound Elastography
  • Magnetic Resonance Elastography
• By Technology Type
  • Strain Elastography
  • Shear-Wave Elastography
  • Transient Elastography
  • Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)
• By Imaging Technique
  • 2-D Imaging
  • 3-D / 4-D Imaging
• By Portability
  • Cart / Trolley-based Systems
  • Portable / Handheld Systems
• By Application
  • Radiology
  • Cardiology
  • Urology
  • Vascular
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal
  • Rheumatology
  • Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
• By End-User
  • Hospitals
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • Diagnostic Imaging Centers
  • Specialty Clinics
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • Australia
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East & Africa
    • GCC
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America

Geography Analysis

North America dominated revenue with a 40.75% share in 2025. Favorable reimbursement for liver elastography and rapid AI software clearance create a receptive regulatory environment. The United States initiated multi-center trials measuring elastography endpoints in NASH drug development, anchoring demand among hepatologists.

Europe maintains stable adoption as national health systems emphasize cost-effectiveness; portable devices offer lower total cost of ownership for district hospitals. The region's imaging societies publish harmonized protocols, improving cross-country comparability and vendor neutrality.

Asia-Pacific delivers an 8.12% CAGR, fueled by expanding healthcare spending, large diabetic populations, and domestic manufacturing of affordable ultrasound chips. China's NMPA issued updated Class III imaging guidelines in 2024, expediting domestic product registrations and spurring local competition. India's point-of-care programs incorporate handheld elastography to screen fatty-liver disease in primary care.

The Middle East and Africa witness incremental adoption through private hospital groups investing in premium diagnostic services. South America shows steady growth as public health campaigns emphasize non-invasive cirrhosis detection, particularly in Brazil and Argentina.

1. Canon
2. Esaote
3. FUJIFILM
4. GE Healthcare
5. Supersonic Imagine
6. Hologic
7. Koninklijke Philips
8. Mindray
9. Resoundant Inc.
10. Samsung Medison Co. Ltd.
11. Siemens Healthineers
12. Hitachi
13. Butterfly Network Inc.
14. Clarius Mobile Health Corp.
15. Echosens SA
16. BK Medical ApS
17. Terason Corporation
18. Verasonics Inc.
19. Shenzhen Wisonic Medical Tech.
20. Alpinion Medical Systems
21. Ultrasonix Medical Corp.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising Incidence Of Chronic Diseases & Breast Cancer
  • 4.2.2 Shift Toward Minimally-Invasive Surgeries
  • 4.2.3 Adoption Of Elastography For Nash-Related Liver Fibrosis Staging
  • 4.2.4 Ai-Enabled Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Elastography
  • 4.2.5 Robotic-Assisted Elastography-Guided Biopsy Platforms
  • 4.2.6 Commercial Rollout Of Handheld Shear-Wave Probes
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Unfavorable Reimbursement Frameworks
  • 4.3.2 High Capital Cost Of MRI-Based Systems
  • 4.3.3 Operator-Dependence Limiting Reproducibility
  • 4.3.4 Supply-Chain Shortage Of High-Frequency Piezo Crystals
• 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
  • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitute Products
  • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Modality
  • 5.1.1 Ultrasound Elastography
  • 5.1.2 Magnetic Resonance Elastography
• 5.2 By Technology Type
  • 5.2.1 Strain Elastography
  • 5.2.2 Shear-Wave Elastography
  • 5.2.3 Transient Elastography
  • 5.2.4 Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)
• 5.3 By Imaging Technique
  • 5.3.1 2-D Imaging
  • 5.3.2 3-D / 4-D Imaging
• 5.4 By Portability
  • 5.4.1 Cart / Trolley-based Systems
  • 5.4.2 Portable / Handheld Systems
• 5.5 By Application
  • 5.5.1 Radiology
  • 5.5.2 Cardiology
  • 5.5.3 Urology
  • 5.5.4 Vascular
  • 5.5.5 Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • 5.5.6 Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal
  • 5.5.7 Rheumatology
  • 5.5.8 Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
• 5.6 By End-User
  • 5.6.1 Hospitals
  • 5.6.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • 5.6.3 Diagnostic Imaging Centers
  • 5.6.4 Specialty Clinics
• 5.7 By Geography
  • 5.7.1 North America
    • 5.7.1.1 United States
    • 5.7.1.2 Canada
    • 5.7.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.7.2 Europe
    • 5.7.2.1 Germany
    • 5.7.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.7.2.3 France
    • 5.7.2.4 Italy
    • 5.7.2.5 Spain
    • 5.7.2.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.7.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.7.3.1 China
    • 5.7.3.2 Japan
    • 5.7.3.3 India
    • 5.7.3.4 Australia
    • 5.7.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.7.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.7.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.7.4.1 GCC
    • 5.7.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.7.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
  • 5.7.5 South America
    • 5.7.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.7.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.7.5.3 Rest of South America

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Market Share Analysis
• 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.3.1 Canon Medical Systems Corporation
  • 6.3.2 Esaote SpA
  • 6.3.3 Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
  • 6.3.4 GE HealthCare
  • 6.3.5 Supersonic Imagine
  • 6.3.6 Hologic Inc.
  • 6.3.7 Koninklijke Philips N.V.
  • 6.3.8 Mindray Medical International Ltd.
  • 6.3.9 Resoundant Inc.
  • 6.3.10 Samsung Medison Co. Ltd.
  • 6.3.11 Siemens Healthineers AG
  • 6.3.12 Hitachi Ltd.
  • 6.3.13 Butterfly Network Inc.
  • 6.3.14 Clarius Mobile Health Corp.
  • 6.3.15 Echosens SA
  • 6.3.16 BK Medical ApS
  • 6.3.17 Terason Corporation
  • 6.3.18 Verasonics Inc.
  • 6.3.19 Shenzhen Wisonic Medical Tech.
  • 6.3.20 Alpinion Medical Systems
  • 6.3.21 Ultrasonix Medical Corp.

7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment