시장보고서
상품코드
1555041

세계의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 : 제품별, 유형별, 기술별, 배양 유형별, 최종 사용자별, 지역별, 기회, 예측(2017-2031년)

Blood Culture Tests Market Assessment, By Product, By Type, By Technology, By Culture Type, By End-user, By Region, Opportunities and Forecast, 2017-2031F

발행일: | 리서치사: Markets & Data | 페이지 정보: 영문 238 Pages | 배송안내 : 3-5일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

세계의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 규모는 예측 기간 동안 9.05%의 복합 연간 성장률(CAGR)로 확대될 전망이며, 2023년 53억 2,000만 달러에서 2031년에는 106억 4,000만 달러로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다. 혈액 배양 검사 시장은 감염증과 패혈증의 이환율 상승, 조기진단과 치료에 중점을 둔 정부의 이니셔티브와 자금 증가로 예측기간 동안 크게 성장하고 기세를 늘릴 것으로 예측됩니다.

혈액 배양 검사는 혈액 샘플에서 박테리아 또는 기타 미생물을 검출하는 진단 과정입니다. 이 검사는 의료 전문가가 혈액에 존재하는 정확한 감염을 확인하고 적절한 치료 정책을 지시하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 감염증의 유병률 증가, 진단 기술의 진보, 환자 케어를 개선하기 위한 조기 및 정확한 진단에 대한 주목 증가는 모두, 혈액 배양 검사 수요 증가의 원인이 되고 있습니다. 또한 혈액 배양 시스템의 진보와 건강 관리 투자 증가가 업계를 진전시키고 있습니다. 신제품 출시로 혈액검사시장은 활황을 보이고 있습니다. 예를 들어, 시험관 서비스의 세계의 리더인 bioMerieux는 2024년 6월 VITEK REVEAL AST 시스템의 미국 FDA 승인을 받았습니다.

항균제 내성(AMR)의 만연은 우수한 진단 솔루션의 필요성을 강조함으로써 혈액 배양 검사 시장을 강력하게 지원합니다. 항균제 내성은 혈류 감염의 치료를 더욱 어렵게 하고, 병원체와 그 내성 패턴의 정확한 검출에 대한 수요가 증가하고 있습니다. 세계보건기구(WHO)에 따르면 항균제 내성(AMR)은 세계의 건강 위협의 최상위로 분류되었으며, 2019년에는 약 495만명이 항균제 내성으로 인해 사망한다고 합니다. 조치를 취하지 않으면 AMR은 심각한 문제로 발전할 수 있습니다. 세계의은행은 2050년까지 AMR이 세계의 의료비를 1조 달러 증가하는 것으로 추정하고 있습니다. 이러한 비용은 환자 수 증가, 감염증의 치료의 어려움, 입원 기간의 장기화와 고액화, 고액의 치료비 등으로부터 발생합니다. 이 과제는 연구개발에 대한 투자를 가속화함으로써 즉각적으로 대응되고, 신속한 결과와 상세한 내성 데이터를 가져오는 고도의 혈액 배양 검사에 결실하고, 항균제 내성의 적절한 관리와 환자의 결과 개선이 가능합니다.

본 보고서에서는 세계의 혈액 배양 검사 시장에 대해 조사했으며, 시장 개요와 함께 제품별, 유형별, 기술별, 배양 유형별, 최종 사용자별, 지역별 동향 및 시장 진출기업 프로파일 등의 정보를 제공합니다.

목차

제1장 프로젝트의 범위와 정의

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 세계의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 전망(2017년-2031년)

  • 시장 규모의 분석과 예측
  • 시장 점유율 분석과 예측
  • 시장 맵 분석(2023년)
    • 제품별
    • 유형별
    • 기술별
    • 배양 유형별
    • 최종 사용자별
    • 지역별

제5장 북미의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 전망(2017년-2031년)

제6장 유럽의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 전망(2017년-2031년)

제7장 아시아태평양의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 전망(2017년-2031년)

제8장 남미의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 전망(2017년-2031년)

제9장 중동 및 아프리카의 혈액 배양 검사 시장 전망(2017년-2031년)

제10장 수요 공급 분석

제11장 수출입 분석

제12장 밸류체인 분석

제13장 Porter's Five Forces 분석

제14장 PESTLE 분석

제15장 가격 분석

제16장 시장 역학

제17장 시장 동향과 발전

제18장 규제 틀과 혁신

제19장 특허의 정세

제20장 사례 연구

제21장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 리더 톱 5의 경쟁 매트릭스
  • 참가 기업 톱 5의 SWOT 분석
  • 시장의 주요 참가 기업 톱 10의 정세
    • bioMerieux
    • Bruker Corporation
    • Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • T2 Biosystems Inc.
    • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
    • Danaher Corporation
    • Siemens Healthineers
    • DiaSorin SpA
    • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
    • Abbott Laboratories

제22장 전략적 제안

제23장 문의와 면책사항

BJH 24.09.20

Global blood culture tests market is projected to witness a CAGR of 9.05% during the forecast period 2024-2031, growing from USD 5.32 billion in 2023 to USD 10.64 billion in 2031. The blood culture tests market is anticipated to grow significantly and gain momentum over the course of the forecast period owing to the rising incidence of infectious diseases and sepsis cases, increased government initiatives and funding coupled with a strong emphasis on early diagnosis and treatment.

A blood culture test is a diagnostic process for detecting bacteria or other microorganisms in a blood sample. This test helps medical professionals identify the precise infection present in the blood and directs the course of appropriate treatment. The increasing prevalence of infectious diseases, advancements in diagnostic technology, and a growing focus on early and accurate diagnosis to improve patient care are all contributing factors to the growth in demand for blood culture tests. Furthermore, advances in blood culture systems and higher healthcare investments are propelling the industry forward. The new product launches keep this blood tests market active; for instance, in June 2024, bioMerieux, a world leader in providing in vitro services, received US-FDA approval for its VITEK REVEAL AST System.

Rising Antimicrobial Resistance Burden in Bloodstream Infections

The growing prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) strongly supports the blood culture tests market by highlighting the need for superior diagnostic solutions. Antimicrobial resistance makes the treatment of bloodstream infection more challenging and creates a growing demand for accurate detection of pathogens and their resistance patterns. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is classified as a top global health threat, with approximately 4.95 million deaths attributed to it in 2019. If not addressed, AMR could escalate into a more significant issue. The World Bank estimates that by 2050, AMR could increase global healthcare costs by an additional USD 1 trillion. These costs arise from the increased numbers of cases, enhanced difficulty of treating infections, longer and more expensive hospitalization, and costly treatments. This challenge has been immediately responded to through accelerated investment in research and development, culminating in advanced blood culture tests that bring fast results and detailed resistance data, enabling good management of antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes.

Increasing Awareness and Fundings Towards Bloodstream Infections

The enhanced awareness and favorable funding scenario to cater to bloodstream infections will further fuel the blood culture tests market concerning higher innovation and access to advanced diagnostics. With increased recognition of the serious consequences of such infections, the industry has experienced significant growth in government and private sector funding. For instance, in August 2024, the Government of Australia invested over USD 3.7 million for enhanced infection control research in geriatric care facilities. Similarly, in February 2024, Wellcome Trust, a London-based health research foundation, funded USD 5.46 million (£4.2 million) to a collaborative team of researchers from Ireland and the United Kingdom to study major causes of fatal bloodstream infections. Such investments are pushing the development of integrated diagnostic platforms to improve testing efficiency and accuracy. This growing attention toward the problem of bloodstream infection, along with the financial backing needed, is therefore playing a growth-promotional role in the blood culture tests market, hence representing one of the major areas of development in healthcare.

Dominance of Consumables in the Blood Culture Tests Market

The consumables segment is expected to dominate the blood culture tests market because it comprises a wide range of products used in blood culture testing. This includes vials, culture media, test kits, assays and reagents. As the accuracy and effectiveness of blood culture testing depend greatly on the quality of the culture media, companies are now highly focused on enhancing its quality. Apart from this, companies producing new assays, culture media, and test kits are currently in the pipeline for FDA clearance. Therefore, this shows that the demand for sophisticated and high-end consumables is increasing. The innovation trend materializing into regulatory approval proves an increasing need for reliable and effective products in blood culture testing. For instance, in June 2024, Diasorin S.p.A. received US FDA (510K) approval for its LIAISON PLEX Yeast blood culture assay, which has enhanced their diagnostic capabilities for bloodstream infections by detecting 16 different fungal infections. Likewise, in April 2024, Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc. received the US FDA (510k) clearance for its innovative automated positive blood culture sample preparation platform, the Accelerate ArcSystem and BC Kit.

North America Dominates Blood Culture Tests Market

North America dominates the blood culture tests market due to the high incidence of bloodstream infections in the United States and Canada, which necessitate these tests. Many aspects contribute to this dominance, including government initiatives aimed at preventing and controlling septicemia, increased investments in R&D, and being home to major players in the blood culture tests market. Some companies are merging their activities with others to improve their diagnostic products leading to better diagnostic results. For example, in November 2023, Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc. collaborated with Bruker Corporation, the manufacturer of the MALDI Biotyper system for microbial identification. This agreement enabled the integration of the Arc system from Accelerate Diagnostics with Bruker MALDI Biotyper Sirius instruments and Sepsityper software to empower laboratories to fight sepsis with better technology. Moreover, in October 2022, Becton, Dickinson and Company, one of the biggest medical technology companies in the world, entered a partnership with Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc. This will help reduce blood culture contamination in hospitals across the United States to enable better test accuracy and clinical outcomes.

Future Market Scenario (2024-2031F)

Government and regulatory agencies are working with companies to enhance practices that consider supply challenges for blood culture testing. For example, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are currently working with BD Life Sciences to understand better the supply issues and be sure that users have information about best practices in using blood cultures and quality assurance. Indeed, these efforts demonstrate the continuing commitment to improve blood culture testing and practice in the future.

Researchers are working on reducing the overall time taken to diagnose critical health issues such as bloodstream infections and sepsis. For this, they are using advanced techniques combined with traditional blood culture testing to reduce the turnaround time. For instance, a publication in 2024 made suggestions to reduce the time between sample collection and treatment decisions for sepsis to seven to nine hours using nanopore sequencing. These developments show blood culture testing holds a promising future for accurate diagnosis and, hence, can lead to faster and more effective treatments.

Key Players Landscape and Outlook

Bruker Corporation, bioMerieux, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Danaher Corporation, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., and Abbott Laboratories are among the blood culture tests market's leading players. The blood culture tests market is very competitive, with various competitors operating in the country and regional markets. With cutting-edge technologies as well as rapid testing methods, these companies are leading in the blood culture tests market with the goal of increasing diagnostic accuracy as well as speed. Their continued investments in research and development, as well as strategic collaborations, are critical to meeting the changing needs of the healthcare sector and improving patient outcomes. For instance,

In January 2024, bioMerieux, a leading global in vitro diagnostics company, completed the acquisition of LUMED, a Canadian software startup. LUMED specializes in clinical decision support systems that help hospitals with antimicrobial prescription and infection surveillance. The deal is valued at around USD 9.9 million (9 million euros). This acquisition will expand the data analytics portfolio of BioMerieux, with a focus on infection prevention and control.

In March 2023, Biofire Defense LLC, a bioMerieux affiliate known for its innovative pathogen detection technologies, partnered with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). BARDA is a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, and it collaborates with Biofire to accelerate the development of the SPECIFIC REVEAL Rapid AST System. This novel, modular antimicrobial susceptibility testing technology intends to offer results within five hours after detecting a positive blood culture, thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of infection diagnosis.

Table of Contents

1. Project Scope and Definitions

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Global Blood Culture Tests Market Outlook, 2017-2031F

  • 4.1. Market Size Analysis & Forecast
    • 4.1.1. By Value
  • 4.2. Market Share Analysis & Forecast
    • 4.2.1. By Product
      • 4.2.1.1. Instruments
        • 4.2.1.1.1. Automated Blood Culture System
        • 4.2.1.1.2. Supporting Laboratory Equipment
        • 4.2.1.1.3. Software and Services
      • 4.2.1.2. Consumables
        • 4.2.1.2.1. Blood Culture Media
        • 4.2.1.2.2. Assay Kits and Reagents
        • 4.2.1.2.3. Blood Culture Accessories
        • 4.2.1.2.4. Others
    • 4.2.2. By Type
      • 4.2.2.1. Manual Blood Culture Testing
      • 4.2.2.2. Automated Blood Culture Testing
    • 4.2.3. By Technology
      • 4.2.3.1. Culture-Based
      • 4.2.3.2. Proteomic Technology
      • 4.2.3.3. Molecular Technology
        • 4.2.3.3.1. Microarrays
        • 4.2.3.3.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
        • 4.2.3.3.3. Peptide Nucleic Acid-Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization (PNA-FiSH)
    • 4.2.4. By Culture Type
      • 4.2.4.1. Bacterial
      • 4.2.4.2. Fungal
      • 4.2.4.3. Micro-bacterial
    • 4.2.5. By End-user
      • 4.2.5.1. Hospital Laboratories
      • 4.2.5.2. Diagnostic Laboratories
      • 4.2.5.3. Others
    • 4.2.6. By Region
      • 4.2.6.1. North America
      • 4.2.6.2. Europe
      • 4.2.6.3. Asia-Pacific
      • 4.2.6.4. South America
      • 4.2.6.5. Middle East and Africa
    • 4.2.7. By Company Market Share Analysis (Top 5 Companies and Others - By Value, 2023)
  • 4.3. Market Map Analysis, 2023
    • 4.3.1. By Product
    • 4.3.2. By Type
    • 4.3.3. By Technology
    • 4.3.4. By Culture Type
    • 4.3.5. By End-user
    • 4.3.6. By Region

5. North America Blood Culture Tests Market Outlook, 2017-2031F*

  • 5.1. Market Size Analysis & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share Analysis & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Product
      • 5.2.1.1. Instruments
        • 5.2.1.1.1. Automated Blood Culture System
        • 5.2.1.1.2. Supporting Laboratory Equipment
        • 5.2.1.1.3. Software and Services
      • 5.2.1.2. Consumables
        • 5.2.1.2.1. Blood Culture Media
        • 5.2.1.2.2. Assay Kits and Reagents
        • 5.2.1.2.3. Blood Culture Accessories
        • 5.2.1.2.4. Others
    • 5.2.2. By Type
      • 5.2.2.1. Manual Blood Culture Testing
      • 5.2.2.2. Automated Blood Culture Testing
    • 5.2.3. By Technology
      • 5.2.3.1. Culture-Based
      • 5.2.3.2. Proteomic Technology
      • 5.2.3.3. Molecular Technology
        • 5.2.3.3.1. Microarrays
        • 5.2.3.3.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
        • 5.2.3.3.3. Peptide Nucleic Acid-Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization (PNA-FiSH)
    • 5.2.4. By Culture Type
      • 5.2.4.1. Bacterial
      • 5.2.4.2. Fungal
      • 5.2.4.3. Micro-bacterial
    • 5.2.5. By End-user
      • 5.2.5.1. Hospital Laboratories
      • 5.2.5.2. Diagnostic Laboratories
      • 5.2.5.3. Others
    • 5.2.6. By Country Share
      • 5.2.6.1. United States
      • 5.2.6.2. Canada
      • 5.2.6.3. Mexico
  • 5.3. Country Market Assessment
    • 5.3.1. United States Blood Culture Tests Market Outlook, 2017-2031F*
      • 5.3.1.1. Market Size Analysis & Forecast
        • 5.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 5.3.1.2. Market Share Analysis & Forecast
        • 5.3.1.2.1. By Product
          • 5.3.1.2.1.1. Instruments
          • 5.3.1.2.1.1.1. Automated Blood Culture System
          • 5.3.1.2.1.1.2. Supporting Laboratory Equipment
          • 5.3.1.2.1.1.3. Software and Services
          • 5.3.1.2.1.2. Consumables
          • 5.3.1.2.1.2.1. Blood Culture Media
          • 5.3.1.2.1.2.2. Assay Kits and Reagents
          • 5.3.1.2.1.2.3. Blood Culture Accessories
          • 5.3.1.2.1.2.4. Others
        • 5.3.1.2.2. By Type
          • 5.3.1.2.2.1. Manual Blood Culture Testing
          • 5.3.1.2.2.2. Automated Blood Culture Testing
        • 5.3.1.2.3. By Technology
          • 5.3.1.2.3.1. Culture-Based
          • 5.3.1.2.3.2. Proteomic Technology
          • 5.3.1.2.3.3. Molecular Technology
          • 5.3.1.2.3.3.1. Microarrays
          • 5.3.1.2.3.3.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
          • 5.3.1.2.3.3.3. Peptide Nucleic Acid-Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization (PNA-FiSH)
        • 5.3.1.2.4. By Culture Type
          • 5.3.1.2.4.1. Bacterial
          • 5.3.1.2.4.2. Fungal
          • 5.3.1.2.4.3. Micro-bacterial
        • 5.3.1.2.5. By End-user
          • 5.3.1.2.5.1. Hospital Laboratories
          • 5.3.1.2.5.2. Diagnostic Laboratories
          • 5.3.1.2.5.3. Others
    • 5.3.2. Canada
    • 5.3.3. Mexico

All segments will be provided for all regions and countries covered

6. Europe Blood Culture Tests Market Outlook, 2017-2031F

  • 6.1. Germany
  • 6.2. France
  • 6.3. Italy
  • 6.4. United Kingdom
  • 6.5. Russia
  • 6.6. Netherlands
  • 6.7. Spain
  • 6.8. Poland

7. Asia-Pacific Blood Culture Tests Market Outlook, 2017-2031F

  • 7.1. India
  • 7.2. China
  • 7.3. Japan
  • 7.4. Australia
  • 7.5. Vietnam
  • 7.6. South Korea
  • 7.7. Indonesia
  • 7.8. Philippines

8. South America Blood Culture Tests Market Outlook, 2017-2031F

  • 8.1. Brazil
  • 8.2. Argentina

9. Middle East and Africa Blood Culture Tests Market Outlook, 2017-2031F

  • 9.1. Saudi Arabia
  • 9.2. UAE
  • 9.3. South Africa
  • 9.4. Israel

10. Demand Supply Analysis

11. Import and Export Analysis

12. Value Chain Analysis

13. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

14. PESTLE Analysis

15. Pricing Analysis

16. Market Dynamics

  • 16.1. Market Drivers
  • 16.2. Market Challenges

17. Market Trends and Developments

18. Regulatory Framework and Innovation

  • 18.1. Clinical Trials
  • 18.2. Regulatory Approvals

19. Patent Landscape

20. Case Studies

21. Competitive Landscape

  • 21.1. Competition Matrix of Top 5 Market Leaders
  • 21.2. SWOT Analysis for Top 5 Players
  • 21.3. Key Players Landscape for Top 10 Market Players
    • 21.3.1. bioMerieux
      • 21.3.1.1. Company Details
      • 21.3.1.2. Key Management Personnel
      • 21.3.1.3. Products and Services
      • 21.3.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
      • 21.3.1.5. Key Market Focus and Geographical Presence
      • 21.3.1.6. Recent Developments/Collaborations/Partnerships/Mergers and Acquisition
    • 21.3.2. Bruker Corporation
    • 21.3.3. Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 21.3.4. T2 Biosystems Inc.
    • 21.3.5. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
    • 21.3.6. Danaher Corporation
    • 21.3.7. Siemens Healthineers
    • 21.3.8. DiaSorin S.p.A.
    • 21.3.9. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
    • 21.3.10. Abbott Laboratories

Companies mentioned above DO NOT hold any order as per market share and can be changed as per information available during research work.

22. Strategic Recommendations

23. About Us and Disclaimer

샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제