½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1432181

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - DERMS Á¦°ø¾÷ü : 10°³ ±×¸®µå DERMS Á¦°ø¾÷ü¿Í 15°³ ±×¸®µå ¿§Áö DERMS Ç÷§Æû Á¦°ø¾÷üÀÇ Àü·« ¹× ½ÇÇà Æò°¡

Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Report - DERMS Providers: Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 10 Grid DERMS and 15 Grid-Edge DERMS Platform Providers

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: Guidehouse Research | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 77 Pages; 32 Tables, Charts & Figures | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : Áï½Ã¹è¼Û

    
    
    



¡Ø º» »óǰÀº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

DERMS(ºÐ»êÇü ¿¡³ÊÁö ÀÚ¿ø(DER) °ü¸® ½Ã½ºÅÛ) ½ÃÀåÀº Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î DERÀÇ µµÀÔÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ºü¸£°Ô ¹ßÀüÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½ÃÀå ¿î¿µÀÚ¿Í ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹Àº DER ÅëÇÕÀ» µµ¸Å ½ÃÀå Ȱµ¿¿¡ ´õ¿í ÅëÇÕÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿Í ±ÔÁ¦ Á¶Á¤À» À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ¹èÀü »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿Í Àü·Â¸Á ¿î¿µÀÚ´Â ÅëÇÕ DERÀÇ ¿î¿µ»óÀÇ ÀÌÁ¡À» Ȱ¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Áö±Ý±îÁöÀÇ ºÐ¼®Àº DERMS Ç÷§Æû°ú °¡»ó ¹ßÀü¼Ò Ç÷§ÆûÀ» ±¸ºÐÇØ ¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª À̹ø Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard¿¡¼­´Â DERÀ» °ü¸®ÇÏ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ºÐ·ùÀÇ ¸í¸í¹ýÀ» °£¼ÒÈ­ÇϰíÀÚ ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ÅëÇÕ DER Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À¸¦ Áö´ÉÀûÀ¸·Î °ü¸®, Á¦¾î ¹× ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î Ç÷§ÆûÀ» ¿ÜºÎ ±â¾÷¿¡ Á¦°øÇϰí, ÇØ´ç Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À°¡ µµ¸Å ½ÃÀåÀ» ÅëÇØ ¶Ç´Â Á÷Á¢ ¹èÀü »ç¾÷ÀÚ¿¡°Ô ±×¸®µå ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±â¾÷À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. DERMS ºÐ¾ß´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹ßÀü °æ·Î°¡ Á¸ÀçÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ DERMS Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ Á¤ÀÇ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °¢ Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë »ç·Ê°¡ ´Ù¸£´Ù´Â Á¡À» ÀνÄÇÏ¿©, º» º¸°í¼­´Â ±×¸®µå DERMS Á¦°ø¾÷ü¿Í ±×¸®µå ¿§Áö DERMS Á¦°ø¾÷ü¿¡ ´ëÇØ °¢°¢ º°µµÀÇ ±×¸®µå¿Í ¼øÀ§¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ±×¸®µå DERMS Ç÷§ÆûÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â 10°³ ÁÖ¿ä º¥´õ¿Í ±×¸®µå ¿§Áö DERMS Ç÷§ÆûÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â 15°³ ÁÖ¿ä º¥´õÀÇ Àü·«°ú ½ÇÇà·ÂÀ» °ËÁõÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¶»ç ´ë»ó ¾÷üµéÀº 12°¡Áö Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥(ºñÀü, ½ÃÀå ÁøÃâ Àü·«, ÆÄÆ®³Ê/±â¾÷ Àμö/ÅõÀÚÀÚ, Á¦Ç° ÅëÇÕ Àü·«, ±â¼ú, Ȱµ¿ Áö¿ª, ¿µ¾÷, ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ, À¯Åë, Ç÷§Æû ¼º´É, Ç÷§Æû ǰÁú/½Å·Ú¼º, ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À, °¡°Ý Ã¥Á¤, Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º)¸¦ ÅëÇØ Æò°¡µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. Guidehouse InsightsÀÇ µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ Leaderboard ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î º¥´õ¸¦ ºÐ¼® ¹× Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© ¼¼°è DERMS Ç÷§Æû ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ »ó´ëÀû °­Á¡°ú ¾àÁ¡À» °´°üÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡Çß½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦2Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

  • ½ÃÀåÀÇ Á¤ÀÇ
  • ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
  • ½ÃÀå À庮
  • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ

Á¦3Àå Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Ä«Å×°í¸®
    • ¸®´õ
    • ÄÁÅÙ´õ
    • 縰Àú
    • ÆÈ·Î¿ö
  • Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard ±×¸®µå

Á¦4Àå ±â¾÷ ¼øÀ§ : Grid DERMS

  • ¸®´õ
    • GE Vernova
    • AspenTech OSI
    • Schneider Electric
  • ÄÁÅÙ´õ
    • mPrest
    • Siemens
    • Oracle
    • Smarter Grid Solutions
    • Minsait ACS
    • Hitachi Energy
    • energy & meteo systems

Á¦5Àå ±â¾÷ ¼øÀ§ : Grid-Edge DERMS

  • ¸®´õ
    • KrakenFlex
    • EnergyHub
    • Schneider Electric - AutoGrid
  • ÄÁÅÙ´õ
    • Resideo
    • OATI
    • Virtual Peaker
    • Lunar Energy
    • Generac Grid Services
    • Itron
    • Evergen
    • GridBeyond
    • Voltalis
    • Stem
    • PXiSE Energy Solutions
    • IEMS

Á¦6Àå µÎÀÚ¾î ¹× ¾à¾î ¸®½ºÆ®

Á¦7Àå ¸ñÂ÷

Á¦8Àå µµÇ¥

Á¦9Àå ºÐ¼® ¹üÀ§¿Í ¹æ¹ý

LSH 24.03.05

The market for distributed energy resources (DER) management systems, or DERMS, is rapidly evolving as DER adoption continues to increase worldwide. Market operators and regulators are working to adjust frameworks and regulations to further integrate DER aggregations into wholesale market activities. Meanwhile, distribution utilities and grid operators are looking to take advantage of the operational benefits of aggregated DER. Historically, Guidehouse Insights has distinguished between DERMS platforms and virtual power plant platforms, with the latter providing a market interface module and generally not being grid aware. However, this version of the Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard seeks to streamline the classification nomenclature used for systems managing DER.

This Leaderboard considers companies that provide a software platform to third parties that is capable of intelligently managing, controlling, and optimizing a portfolio of aggregated DER such that the portfolio can provide grid services either through wholesale markets or directly to a distribution utility. The DERMS space has seen different paths to development, leading to additional uncertainty around DERMS platform definitions. To acknowledge the different use cases for each platform type, this report includes separate grids and rankings for grid DERMS providers and grid-edge DERMS providers.

This Leaderboard examines the strategy and execution of 10 leading vendors offering grid DERMS platforms and 15 leading vendors offering grid-edge DERMS platforms. The providers are rated on 12 criteria: vision; go-to-market strategy; partners/acquisitions/investors; product integration strategy; technology; geographic reach; sales, marketing, and distribution; platform performance; platform quality and reliability; project portfolio; pricing; and staying power. Using Guidehouse Insights' proprietary Leaderboard methodology, vendors are profiled, rated, and ranked with the goal of providing an objective assessment of their relative strengths and weaknesses in the global DERMS platform market.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market Introduction
  • 1.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

  • 2.1 Market Definition
  • 2.2 Market Drivers
  • 2.3 Market Barriers
  • 2.4 Market Trends

3. The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard

  • 3.1 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Categories
    • 3.1.1 Leaders
    • 3.1.2 Contenders
    • 3.1.3 Challengers
    • 3.1.4 Followers
  • 3.2 The Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings - Grid DERMS

  • 4.1 Leaders
    • 4.1.1 GE Vernova
    • 4.1.2 AspenTech OSI
    • 4.1.3 Schneider Electric
  • 4.2 Contenders
    • 4.2.1 mPrest
    • 4.2.2 Siemens
    • 4.2.3 Oracle
    • 4.2.4 Smarter Grid Solutions
    • 4.2.5 Minsait ACS
    • 4.2.6 Hitachi Energy
    • 4.2.7 energy & meteo systems

5. Company Rankings - Grid-Edge DERMS

  • 5.1 Leaders
    • 5.1.1 KrakenFlex
    • 5.1.2 EnergyHub
    • 5.1.3 Schneider Electric - AutoGrid
  • 5.2 Contenders
    • 5.2.1 Resideo
    • 5.2.2 OATI
    • 5.2.3 Virtual Peaker
    • 5.2.4 Lunar Energy
    • 5.2.5 Generac Grid Services
    • 5.2.6 Itron
    • 5.2.7 Evergen
    • 5.2.8 GridBeyond
    • 5.2.9 Voltalis
    • 5.2.10 Stem
    • 5.2.11 PXiSE Energy Solutions
    • 5.2.12 IEMS

6. Acronym and Abbreviation List

7. Table of Contents

8. Table of Charts and Figures

9. Scope of Study and Methodology

  • 9.1 Scope of Study
  • 9.2 Sources and Methodology
    • 9.2.1 Vendor Selection
    • 9.2.2 Ratings Scale
      • 9.2.2.1 Score Calculations
    • 9.2.3 Criteria Definitions
      • 9.2.3.1 Strategy
      • 9.2.3.2 Execution
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦