시장보고서
상품코드
1637309

PARP 저해제 바이오마커 시장 : 세계 산업 규모, 점유율, 동향, 기회, 예측 - 제품별, 서비스별, 용도별, 지역별, 경쟁별(2020-2030년)

PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Product, By Services, By Application, By Region & Competition, 2020-2030F

발행일: | 리서치사: TechSci Research | 페이지 정보: 영문 180 Pages | 배송안내 : 2-3일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




※ 본 상품은 영문 자료로 한글과 영문 목차에 불일치하는 내용이 있을 경우 영문을 우선합니다. 정확한 검토를 위해 영문 목차를 참고해주시기 바랍니다.

세계의 PARP 억제제 바이오마커 시장은 2024년 9억 3,410만 달러로 평가되었고, 예측 기간 중 8.74%의 연평균 복합 성장률(CAGR)로 2030년에는 15억 4,400만 달러에 달할 것으로 예상됩니다. 암 치료의 맞춤 치료를 위한 바이오마커의 활용이 증가함에 따라 시장이 성장하고 있습니다. 바이오마커 검사의 발전은 PARP 억제제의 효능을 향상시켜 암 환자들에게 보다 표적화된 효과적인 치료를 가능하게 하고 있습니다. 이러한 성장의 원동력은 진행 중인 연구와 종양학 분야에서의 정밀의료 도입 증가에 기인합니다.

시장 개요
예측 기간 2026-2030년
시장 규모 : 2024년 9억 3,410만 달러
시장 규모 : 2030년 15억 4,400만 달러
CAGR : 2025-2030년 8.74%
급성장 부문 키트
최대 시장 북미

시장 성장 촉진요인

유방암과 난소암의 유병률 증가

진단 기술의 발전

규제 당국의 승인 및 가이드라인 증가

주요 시장 이슈

PARP 억제제 바이오마커의 바이오마커 복잡성 및 검증에 대한 자료입니다.

PARP 억제제 바이오마커의 비용 및 상환 문제

주요 시장 동향

BRCA 유전자 변이 이외의 적응증 확대

일상 진료에 바이오마커 검사 통합

목차

제1장 개요

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 개요

제4장 고객의 소리

제5장 세계의 PARP 저해제 바이오마커 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모·예측
    • 금액별
  • 시장 점유율·예측
    • 제품별(키트, 어세이)
    • 서비스별(BRCA 1 및 2 검사, HRD 검사, HRR 검사, 기타)
    • 용도별(유방암, 난소암, 기타)
    • 기업별(2023년)
    • 지역별
  • 시장 맵

제6장 북미의 PARP 저해제 바이오마커 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모·예측
    • 금액별
  • 시장 점유율·예측
    • 제품별
    • 서비스별
    • 용도별
    • 국가별
  • 북미 : 국가별 분석
    • 미국
    • 멕시코
    • 캐나다

제7장 유럽의 PARP 저해제 바이오마커 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모·예측
    • 금액별
  • 시장 점유율·예측
    • 제품별
    • 서비스별
    • 용도별
    • 국가별
  • 유럽 : 국가별 분석
    • 프랑스
    • 독일
    • 영국
    • 이탈리아
    • 스페인

제8장 아시아태평양의 PARP 저해제 바이오마커 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모·예측
    • 금액별
  • 시장 점유율·예측
    • 제품별
    • 서비스별
    • 용도별
    • 국가별
  • 아시아태평양 : 국가별 분석
    • 중국
    • 인도
    • 한국
    • 일본
    • 호주

제9장 남미의 PARP 저해제 바이오마커 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모·예측
    • 금액별
  • 시장 점유율·예측
    • 제품별
    • 서비스별
    • 용도별
    • 국가별
  • 남미 : 국가별 분석
    • 브라질
    • 아르헨티나
    • 콜롬비아

제10장 중동 및 아프리카의 PARP 저해제 바이오마커 시장 전망

  • 시장 규모·예측
    • 금액별
  • 시장 점유율·예측
    • 제품별
    • 서비스별
    • 용도별
    • 국가별
  • 중동 및 아프리카 : 국가별 분석
    • 남아프리카공화국
    • 사우디아라비아
    • 아랍에미리트
    • 이집트
    • 터키

제11장 시장 역학

  • 촉진요인
  • 과제

제12장 시장 동향과 발전

  • 합병 및 인수(해당하는 경우)
  • 제품의 발매(해당하는 경우)
  • 최근 동향

제13장 Porter's Five Forces 분석

  • 업계내 경쟁
  • 신규 참여의 가능성
  • 공급업체의 힘
  • 고객의 힘
  • 대체품의 위협

제14장 경쟁 구도

  • Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  • Ambry Genetics
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
  • Illumina, Inc.
  • CENTOGENE N.V.
  • Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.
  • Invitae Corporation
  • NeoGenomics Laboratories.
  • QIAGEN N.V.
  • Agilent Technologies, Inc.

제15장 전략적 제안

제16장 조사회사 소개·면책사항

KSA 25.02.10

Global PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market was valued at USD 934.10 million in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 1544.0 million by 2030 with a CAGR of 8.74% during the forecast period. The PARP inhibitors biomarkers market is growing as these biomarkers are increasingly used to guide personalized cancer treatment, particularly in tumors with BRCA mutations. Advancements in biomarker testing are enhancing the efficacy of PARP inhibitors, leading to more targeted and effective therapies for cancer patients. This growth is driven by ongoing research and the rising adoption of precision medicine in oncology.

Market Overview
Forecast Period2026-2030
Market Size 2024USD 934.10 Million
Market Size 2030USD 1544.0 Million
CAGR 2025-20308.74%
Fastest Growing SegmentKits
Largest MarketNorth America

Key Market Drivers

Increasing Prevalence of Breast and Ovarian Cancer

The increasing prevalence of cancer, particularly breast and ovarian cancers, has significantly boosted the demand for personalized medicine approaches like PARP inhibitors. These inhibitors target specific DNA repair mechanisms in cancer cells, making them particularly effective in treating tumors with specific biomarkers, such as BRCA mutations. As genomic testing becomes more prevalent and cost-effective, the identification of patients who would benefit from PARP inhibitors based on biomarker profiles has become more precise and widespread. This trend not only drives the growth of the PARP inhibitor biomarkers market but also underscores the importance of biomarker testing in clinical decision-making. Moreover, in the United States, it's estimated that breast cancer will lead to the deaths of approximately 43,170 women and 530 men in 2023. Certain inherited gene mutations significantly elevate the risk of developing breast cancer. According to the American Cancer Society, around 5% of breast cancer cases in the U.S. are linked to these inherited genetic mutations. This underscores the critical necessity for advanced diagnostic approaches, such as PARP inhibitor biomarkers, aimed at enhancing survival rates and enhancing the quality of life for individuals diagnosed with this condition.

Advancements in Diagnostic Technologies

Advancements in diagnostic technologies represent a pivotal driver in the PARP inhibitors biomarkers market, revolutionizing how cancer treatment strategies are personalized and optimized. These technologies encompass a range of sophisticated methodologies, including genomic sequencing, proteomics, and molecular imaging techniques, which enable healthcare providers to delve deeper into the genetic and molecular characteristics of tumors. By identifying specific biomarkers associated with DNA repair mechanisms, such as BRCA mutations and other genetic alterations, diagnostic technologies play a crucial role in predicting patient responses to PARP inhibitors. This precision medicine approach allows clinicians to tailor treatment plans based on individual biomarker profiles, maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.

The evolution of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been particularly transformative, enabling comprehensive genomic profiling of tumors to uncover rare and novel biomarkers that may influence PARP inhibitor sensitivity. NGS platforms can detect mutations, copy number alterations, and chromosomal rearrangements with high accuracy and throughput, facilitating the identification of patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy. Moreover, advances in liquid biopsy techniques offer non-invasive options for monitoring tumor dynamics and detecting biomarkers in circulating tumor DNA or other biofluids, providing real-time insights into treatment response and disease progression.

Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms enhances the analysis and interpretation of complex genomic data, aiding in the discovery of biomarkers that predict PARP inhibitor efficacy across diverse patient populations. These technological advancements not only accelerate biomarker discovery but also streamline the development and validation of diagnostic assays for clinical use. As diagnostic technologies continue to evolve and become more accessible, they empower oncologists and healthcare providers to make informed decisions regarding PARP inhibitor treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes and contributing to the growth of the PARP inhibitors biomarkers market on a global scale.

Growing Regulatory Approvals and Guidelines

Regulatory approvals and guidelines wield significant influence over the PARP inhibitors biomarkers market, shaping its trajectory and dynamics in the realm of personalized medicine. Leading regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA have sanctioned several PARP inhibitors for diverse clinical indications, often contingent upon specific biomarker-driven criteria. These approvals hinge on robust clinical trial data that affirm the efficacy and safety of these inhibitors in patients harboring biomarker profiles, such as BRCA mutations. The evolution of regulatory frameworks reflects a broader commitment to advancing personalized medicine, aligning with the paradigm shift towards tailored therapies based on individual patient characteristics. This alignment not only underscores the importance of biomarker testing in clinical decision-making but also fosters confidence among pharmaceutical developers and healthcare providers. Clear regulatory pathways for biomarker-driven therapies streamline the development, validation, and adoption of PARP inhibitor biomarker tests, expediting their integration into routine clinical practice.

Moreover, as regulatory agencies continue to refine their guidelines, they catalyze innovation within the PARP inhibitors biomarkers market by encouraging investment in research and development. This regulatory support nurtures a fertile environment for novel biomarker discoveries and technological advancements, enhancing the precision and scope of biomarker testing for PARP inhibitor therapies. In essence, regulatory approvals and guidelines serve as cornerstone pillars in the landscape of the PARP inhibitors biomarkers market, playing a pivotal role in defining standards of care, fostering innovation, and ultimately improving patient outcomes through targeted, biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies. Their ongoing evolution not only ensures compliance and safety but also propels market growth by promoting the adoption of cutting-edge diagnostic technologies that optimize treatment efficacy and quality of life for cancer patients worldwide.

Key Market Challenges

Complexity and Validation of Biomarkers in the PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers

The complexity involved in identifying and validating biomarkers that reliably predict patient response to therapy. While biomarkers such as BRCA mutations are well-established indicators of PARP inhibitor sensitivity, there is ongoing research to discover additional biomarkers that can expand patient eligibility and improve treatment outcomes. The validation process for biomarkers involves rigorous clinical studies to demonstrate their correlation with treatment response, which requires substantial time, resources, and collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory agencies.

Furthermore, the heterogeneity of tumors and genetic mutations among cancer patients adds another layer of complexity. Biomarker testing must account for variations in tumor biology and genetic profiles to accurately select patients who are likely to benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy. This variability necessitates the development of multiplex testing platforms capable of detecting multiple biomarkers simultaneously, thereby enhancing the precision and clinical utility of biomarker-driven treatment decisions.

Overcoming these challenges requires continued investment in biomarker discovery research, robust clinical validation studies, and the standardization of biomarker testing protocols across healthcare settings. Collaboration between industry stakeholders, academic institutions, and regulatory bodies is essential to streamline the validation and regulatory approval processes for new biomarkers, ultimately facilitating their integration into routine clinical practice.

Manufacturers and marketing agencies employ a wide range of advertising strategies to boost the sales of PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers. Unfortunately, some of these strategies involve making false claims about the effectiveness of these supplements, luring unsuspecting customers with promises of fast and superior results. Consequently, first-time buyers are often left disappointed when these products fail to deliver as promised.

Cost and Reimbursement Challenges in PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers

Another significant challenge in the PARP inhibitor biomarkers market relates to the cost-effectiveness and reimbursement landscape associated with biomarker testing. Biomarker testing technologies, such as genomic sequencing and companion diagnostic assays, can be costly, particularly when multiple biomarkers need to be evaluated for personalized treatment decisions. The high upfront costs of these tests may pose financial barriers to widespread adoption, especially in healthcare systems with limited resources or reimbursement constraints. Moreover, the reimbursement landscape for biomarker testing varies geographically and across different healthcare payers, creating uncertainty for healthcare providers and patients regarding coverage and reimbursement policies. Insufficient reimbursement rates or delays in reimbursement approval for biomarker tests may deter healthcare providers from incorporating these tests into routine clinical practice, despite their potential to enhance treatment outcomes and reduce overall healthcare costs by guiding more targeted and effective therapies.

Addressing these cost and reimbursement challenges requires collaborative efforts among stakeholders to demonstrate the clinical and economic value of biomarker-driven therapies, such as PARP inhibitors. Health economic studies that quantify the cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing in improving patient outcomes and reducing long-term healthcare costs can provide critical evidence to support reimbursement decisions. Additionally, advocacy efforts aimed at aligning reimbursement policies with advances in personalized medicine can help mitigate financial barriers and promote equitable access to biomarker testing for all eligible patients.

Key Market Trends

Expansion of Indications Beyond BRCA Mutations

There has been a notable trend in the PARP inhibitor biomarkers market towards expanding indications beyond BRCA mutations. Initially approved primarily for ovarian and breast cancers with BRCA mutations, PARP inhibitors are now being explored for efficacy in cancers with other DNA repair deficiencies, such as those involving mutations in genes like ATM, PALB2, and others involved in the homologous recombination repair pathway. These biomarkers are crucial as they indicate sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, like BRCA mutations. As genomic profiling techniques become more sophisticated and accessible, oncologists can identify a broader range of biomarkers that predict responsiveness to PARP inhibitors. This trend is driven by advancements in understanding cancer biology and the mechanisms by which tumors develop resistance to treatment. Clinical trials and real-world evidence are increasingly demonstrating the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in patients with various biomarkers beyond BRCA mutations, thereby expanding treatment options and improving outcomes for a larger patient population.

Integration of Biomarker Testing into Routine Clinical Practice

The increasing integration of biomarker testing into routine clinical practice is another significant trend that increasing integration of biomarker testing. Biomarker testing plays a pivotal role in identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy, guiding treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes. This trend is driven by advancements in diagnostic technologies, growing evidence supporting the clinical utility of biomarkers, and evolving guidelines that emphasize personalized medicine approaches in oncology. So, the integration of biomarker testing into routine clinical practice enhances the efficiency of treatment decision-making processes. Oncologists can use biomarker information to select the most appropriate therapy for each patient, thereby optimizing treatment outcomes and minimizing the risk of unnecessary side effects from ineffective treatments. Moreover, ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning are enhancing the accuracy and predictive power of biomarker tests, further driving their adoption in clinical settings.

Segmental Insights

Product Insights

Based on the product, the kits segment held the largest revenue share, owing to their utility in testing and diagnosing conditions linked to gene mutations and alterations, diagnostic kits have become essential tools in healthcare. Breast cancer, often associated with inherited gene mutations, underscores the significance of these kits. Market leaders operated in the market constantly focusing to meet the growing demand for precise diagnostics. For example, Myriad Genetics, Inc., has developed myChoice CDx, an FDA-approved test for identifying advanced ovarian cancer patients with positive homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. This genetic condition is found in about 48% of ovarian cancer tumors, driving market expansion significantly.

Moreover, diagnostic kits offer a precise and accurate method for detecting biomarkers associated with PARP inhibitor sensitivity, such as BRCA mutations or other DNA repair deficiencies. These kits are designed to identify specific genetic alterations or biomarkers in tumor samples or blood samples, enabling oncologists to make informed treatment decisions based on individual patient profiles. The reliability of these tests is crucial in selecting the most appropriate therapy, optimizing treatment efficacy, and minimizing potential adverse effects. On the other hand, kits provide standardized testing protocols that ensure consistency and reliability across different healthcare settings. This standardization is essential for comparing results between laboratories and ensuring reproducibility in clinical practice. Moreover, the availability of commercially developed kits simplifies the implementation of biomarker testing in routine clinical workflows, making it accessible even in smaller hospitals or community clinics that may not have the resources for in-house testing.

Regional Insights

North America emerged as the dominant region in the global PARP inhibitor biomarkers market in 2024. This significant market share can be attributed to the growing incidence of cancer, advancements in genomic technologies, and escalating healthcare expenditures on cancer treatment. According to a report by the American Cancer Society, it is estimated that in 2022, there will be approximately 1.9 million new cases of cancer diagnosed and around 609,360 cancer-related deaths in the United States. On the other hand, the American Cancer Society projects that in 2024, an estimated 310,720 women will receive a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer annually, along with approximately 56,500 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Additionally, it is anticipated that about 42,250 women will lose their lives to breast cancer.

Key Market Players

  • Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  • Ambry Genetics
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
  • Illumina, Inc.
  • CENTOGENE N.V.
  • Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.
  • Invitae Corporation
  • NeoGenomics Laboratories.
  • QIAGEN N.V.
  • Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market, By Product:

  • Kits
  • Assays

PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market, By Services:

  • BRCA 1&2 Testing
  • HRD Testing
  • HRR Testing
  • Others

PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market, By Application:

  • Breast Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Others

PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market, By Region:

  • North America
    • United States
    • Mexico
    • Canada
  • Europe
    • France
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Spain
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Japan
    • Australia
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East and Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Egypt
    • Turkey

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market.

Available Customizations:

Global PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

  • 1.1. Market Definition
  • 1.2. Scope of the Market
    • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
    • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
    • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Objective of the Study
  • 2.2. Baseline Methodology
  • 2.3. Key Industry Partners
  • 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
  • 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
  • 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
  • 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Overview of the Market
  • 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
  • 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
  • 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
  • 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 5.1.1. By Value
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Product (Kits, Assays)
    • 5.2.2. By Services (BRCA 1 & 2 Testing, HRD Testing, HRR Testing, Others)
    • 5.2.3. By Application (Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Others)
    • 5.2.4. By Company (2023)
    • 5.2.5. By Region
  • 5.3. Market Map

6. North America PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 6.1.1. By Value
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Product
    • 6.2.2. By Services
    • 6.2.3. By Application
    • 6.2.4. By Country
  • 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
    • 6.3.1. United States PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.1.2.1. By Product
        • 6.3.1.2.2. By Services
        • 6.3.1.2.3. By Application
    • 6.3.2. Mexico PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.2.2.1. By Product
        • 6.3.2.2.2. By Services
        • 6.3.2.2.3. By Application
    • 6.3.3. Canada PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 6.3.3.2.1. By Product
        • 6.3.3.2.2. By Services
        • 6.3.3.2.3. By Application

7. Europe PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 7.1.1. By Value
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Product
    • 7.2.2. By Services
    • 7.2.3. By Application
    • 7.2.4. By Country
  • 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
    • 7.3.1. France PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.1.2.1. By Product
        • 7.3.1.2.2. By Services
        • 7.3.1.2.3. By Application
    • 7.3.2. Germany PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.2.2.1. By Product
        • 7.3.2.2.2. By Services
        • 7.3.2.2.3. By Application
    • 7.3.3. United Kingdom PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.3.2.1. By Product
        • 7.3.3.2.2. By Services
        • 7.3.3.2.3. By Application
    • 7.3.4. Italy PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.4.2.1. By Product
        • 7.3.4.2.2. By Services
        • 7.3.4.2.3. By Application
    • 7.3.5. Spain PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 7.3.5.2.1. By Product
        • 7.3.5.2.2. By Services
        • 7.3.5.2.3. By Application

8. Asia-Pacific PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 8.1.1. By Value
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Product
    • 8.2.2. By Services
    • 8.2.3. By Application
    • 8.2.4. By Country
  • 8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
    • 8.3.1. China PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.1.2.1. By Product
        • 8.3.1.2.2. By Services
        • 8.3.1.2.3. By Application
    • 8.3.2. India PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.2.2.1. By Product
        • 8.3.2.2.2. By Services
        • 8.3.2.2.3. By Application
    • 8.3.3. South Korea PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.3.2.1. By Product
        • 8.3.3.2.2. By Services
        • 8.3.3.2.3. By Application
    • 8.3.4. Japan PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.4.2.1. By Product
        • 8.3.4.2.2. By Services
        • 8.3.4.2.3. By Application
    • 8.3.5. Australia PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 8.3.5.2.1. By Product
        • 8.3.5.2.2. By Services
        • 8.3.5.2.3. By Application

9. South America PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 9.1.1. By Value
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Product
    • 9.2.2. By Services
    • 9.2.3. By Application
    • 9.2.4. By Country
  • 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
    • 9.3.1. Brazil PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.1.2.1. By Product
        • 9.3.1.2.2. By Services
        • 9.3.1.2.3. By Application
    • 9.3.2. Argentina PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.2.2.1. By Product
        • 9.3.2.2.2. By Services
        • 9.3.2.2.3. By Application
    • 9.3.3. Colombia PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 9.3.3.2.1. By Product
        • 9.3.3.2.2. By Services
        • 9.3.3.2.3. By Application

10. Middle East and Africa PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook

  • 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
    • 10.1.1. By Value
  • 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 10.2.1. By Product
    • 10.2.2. By Services
    • 10.2.3. By Application
    • 10.2.4. By Country
  • 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
    • 10.3.1. South Africa PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.1.2.1. By Product
        • 10.3.1.2.2. By Services
        • 10.3.1.2.3. By Application
    • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.2.2.1. By Product
        • 10.3.2.2.2. By Services
        • 10.3.2.2.3. By Application
    • 10.3.3. UAE PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.3.2.1. By Product
        • 10.3.3.2.2. By Services
        • 10.3.3.2.3. By Application
    • 10.3.4. Egypt PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 10.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.4.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.4.2.1. By Product
        • 10.3.4.2.2. By Services
        • 10.3.4.2.3. By Application
    • 10.3.5. Turkey PARP Inhibitor Biomarkers Market Outlook
      • 10.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
        • 10.3.5.1.1. By Value
      • 10.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
        • 10.3.5.2.1. By Product
        • 10.3.5.2.2. By Services
        • 10.3.5.2.3. By Application

11. Market Dynamics

  • 11.1. Drivers
  • 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

  • 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
  • 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
  • 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Porters Five Forces Analysis

  • 13.1. Competition in the Industry
  • 13.2. Potential of New Entrants
  • 13.3. Power of Suppliers
  • 13.4. Power of Customers
  • 13.5. Threat of Substitute Products

14. Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
    • 14.1.1. Business Overview
    • 14.1.2. Company Snapshot
    • 14.1.3. Products & Services
    • 14.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
    • 14.1.5. Recent Developments
    • 14.1.6. Key Personnel Details
    • 14.1.7. SWOT Analysis
  • 14.2. Ambry Genetics
  • 14.3. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
  • 14.4. Illumina, Inc.
  • 14.5. CENTOGENE N.V.
  • 14.6. Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.
  • 14.7. Invitae Corporation
  • 14.8. NeoGenomics Laboratories.
  • 14.9. QIAGEN N.V.
  • 14.10. Agilent Technologies, Inc.

15. Strategic Recommendations

16. About Us & Disclaimer

샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제