생물학적 연체동물 살충제 시장 : 세계 산업 규모, 점유율, 동향, 기회, 예측 - 유형별, 용도별, 지역별, 경쟁(2021-2031년)

The Global Biological Molluscicides Market is projected to expand from USD 387.90 Million in 2025 to USD 512.15 Million by 2031, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 4.74%. These pest control agents, formulated from natural sources such as bacteria and plant extracts, are designed to suppress snail and slug populations with negligible environmental impact. The primary forces driving this market include increasingly stringent prohibitions on synthetic chemicals and a growing global appetite for organic food production. This positive momentum is corroborated by sector performance metrics indicating wider acceptance of these inputs; for instance, the International Biocontrol Manufacturers Association reported in 2024 that the European biocontrol market reached a valuation of 1.6 billion Euros, highlighting a significant economic shift toward sustainable agricultural methods that supports the biological molluscicide industry.

However, the market faces a substantial hurdle in the form of lengthy and costly regulatory approval procedures for new biological ingredients. Manufacturers frequently encounter disjointed registration systems across various regions, which delays product launches and inflates development expenses. This regulatory bottleneck notably retards the deployment of advanced biological solutions required to manage invasive mollusk species, thereby preventing the industry from effectively satisfying the escalating agricultural demand.

Market Driver

Rigorous regulatory constraints regarding synthetic chemical molluscicides act as the principal catalyst reshaping the global landscape. Authorities worldwide are actively removing conventional active ingredients, such as metaldehyde, from the market due to their persistence in water sources and toxicity to non-target wildlife. This legislative pressure compels a shift toward biological substitutes like ferric phosphate, which adhere to tighter environmental safety protocols while ensuring effective crop protection. The industry's strategic pivot in response to these regulations is reflected in the financial results of major agrochemical entities; according to Syngenta Group's 'Full Year 2023 Financial Results' released in April 2024, sales within their Biologicals segment increased by 11 percent, demonstrating a rapid commercial transition away from traditional chemistries.

Simultaneously, the accelerated growth of global organic farming and sustainable agriculture functions as a second vital driver of market demand. As producers strive to attain certifications that ban synthetic inputs, the use of organically approved snail and slug control formulations becomes mandatory, a trend further supported by Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies favoring low-risk options to protect soil biodiversity. The scale of this market potential is highlighted by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) in its February 2024 'World of Organic Agriculture 2024' report, which notes that global organic agricultural land has surpassed 96 million hectares. Consequently, leading developers are seeing substantial revenue; for example, Corteva Agriscience reported in its February 2024 '2023 Annual Report' that its biologicals portfolio achieved net sales of roughly 420 million U.S. Dollars, underscoring the strong economic value of this sustainability-oriented sector.

Market Challenge

The protracted and expensive regulatory approval process constitutes a significant barrier to the expansion of the Global Biological Molluscicides Market. Biological active ingredients are frequently subjected to registration frameworks originally established for synthetic chemicals, which are often inappropriate for natural compounds. This lack of alignment leads to exhaustive data demands and disparate testing protocols across various jurisdictions, compelling manufacturers to direct significant resources toward compliance rather than innovation. As a result, the time needed to introduce new biological molluscicides to the market is dramatically extended, postponing revenue streams and discouraging investment from smaller biotechnology firms that lack the financial resilience to manage such complex bureaucratic requirements.

This regulatory inefficiency directly limits the accessibility of sustainable pest control solutions for agricultural producers. When product approvals are stalled, the industry is unable to react quickly to new invasive mollusk threats, forcing farmers to depend on outdated chemical treatments. The gravity of this operational constraint is illustrated by recent industry statistics; according to the International Biocontrol Manufacturers Association in 2024, the regulatory review timeline for biocontrol solutions in the European Union has stretched to as long as ten years. This duration is in sharp contrast to the more expedited timelines seen in other agricultural markets, significantly hindering the sector's capacity to expand and compete effectively.

Market Trends

Increasing research and development spending on microbial and nematode-based solutions is fundamentally transforming product pipelines as manufacturers aim to address the efficacy limitations of earlier biological generations. Leading agrochemical firms are aggressively shifting focus toward fermentation technologies and parasitic nematodes, such as Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, to create molluscicides that achieve mortality rates similar to synthetic chemicals while avoiding strict residue restrictions. This push for innovation is substantiated by the commercial performance of portfolios focused on these sustainable inputs; according to UPL Ltd's 'Q4 & Full Year FY24 Results Update' from May 2024, the share of the company's differentiated and sustainable portfolio, which includes natural plant protection solutions, increased to roughly 35 percent of its total crop protection revenue, indicating a strong market transition toward these advanced biological technologies.

Concurrently, the rising use of biological molluscicides in Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) and greenhouses represents a high-value growth avenue for the industry. Growers in these high-humidity settings, which are conducive to slug and snail proliferation, are increasingly turning to biological agents to meet the zero-residue requirements of premium retail supply chains. This demand is driving significant capital investment intended to expand the production of specialized biological controls for covered crops. For instance, Biobest Group announced in a January 2024 press release titled 'M&G Investments Invests EUR 75 Million In Biobest' that it had secured an equity investment of 75 million Euros to fund its ongoing expansion in the global biological crop protection market, highlighting the substantial financial momentum supporting this niche agricultural sector.

Key Market Players

• Lonza Group Ltd.
• Bayer CropScience Limited
• AMVAC Chemical Corporation
• BASF SE
• Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd
• De Sangosse Ltd
• Syngenta Crop Protection AG
• QINGDAO HISIGMA CHEMICALS CO., LTD
• INDUSTRIALCHIMICA S.R.L.
• Doff Portland Ltd

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Biological Molluscicides Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Biological Molluscicides Market, By Type

• Metaldehyde
• Methiocarb
• Ferrous Phosphate
• Others

Biological Molluscicides Market, By Application

• Field Crops
• Horticultural Crops
• Turf & Ornamentals
• Industrial
• Other

Biological Molluscicides Market, By Region

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Biological Molluscicides Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Biological Molluscicides Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Type (Metaldehyde, Methiocarb, Ferrous Phosphate, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Application (Field Crops, Horticultural Crops, Turf & Ornamentals, Industrial, Other)
  • 5.2.3. By Region
  • 5.2.4. By Company (2025)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Type
  • 6.2.2. By Application
  • 6.2.3. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 6.3.2. Canada Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Application

7. Europe Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Type
  • 7.2.2. By Application
  • 7.2.3. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.2. France Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.4. Italy Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Application
  • 7.3.5. Spain Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Application

8. Asia Pacific Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Type
  • 8.2.2. By Application
  • 8.2.3. By Country
• 8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 8.3.2. India Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 8.3.3. Japan Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Application
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Application
  • 8.3.5. Australia Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Type
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Application

9. Middle East & Africa Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Type
  • 9.2.2. By Application
  • 9.2.3. By Country
• 9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 9.3.2. UAE Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 9.3.3. South Africa Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Application

10. South America Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Type
  • 10.2.2. By Application
  • 10.2.3. By Country
• 10.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. Brazil Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Application
  • 10.3.2. Colombia Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Application
  • 10.3.3. Argentina Biological Molluscicides Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Application

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Global Biological Molluscicides Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• 14.1. Competition in the Industry
• 14.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 14.3. Power of Suppliers
• 14.4. Power of Customers
• 14.5. Threat of Substitute Products

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. Lonza Group Ltd.
  • 15.1.1. Business Overview
  • 15.1.2. Products & Services
  • 15.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 15.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
• 15.2. Bayer CropScience Limited
• 15.3. AMVAC Chemical Corporation
• 15.4. BASF SE
• 15.5. Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd
• 15.6. De Sangosse Ltd
• 15.7. Syngenta Crop Protection AG
• 15.8. QINGDAO HISIGMA CHEMICALS CO., LTD
• 15.9. INDUSTRIALCHIMICA S.R.L.
• 15.10. Doff Portland Ltd

16. Strategic Recommendations

17. About Us & Disclaimer