저궤도(LEO) 위성 시장 : 용도별, 제품별, 지역별 분석 및 예측(2025-2035년)

This report can be delivered within 1 working day.

Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market Overview

The low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market was valued at $11,221,800 thousand in 2024 and is projected to reach $254,000 thousand by 2035. The LEO satellite market has been primarily driven by the accelerating demand for low-latency, high-throughput global connectivity that terrestrial networks alone cannot economically deliver. Traditional geostationary systems introduce a latency of ~600 milliseconds, whereas LEO networks typically operate below 40-50 milliseconds, making them viable for cloud computing, real-time collaboration, and latency-sensitive applications. A second major driver is the sharp decline in launch and manufacturing costs; launch costs per kilogram to LEO have fallen by roughly 85-95% over the past two decades, while small satellites now represent over 70% of annual satellite launches, enabling constellation-scale economics. Additionally, the rapid expansion of data-intensive industries, including IoT, autonomous systems, precision agriculture, and Earth observation, requires high revisit rates and persistent coverage that LEO constellations uniquely provide. Government and defense demand further accelerates the market, as distributed LEO architectures offer greater resilience and redundancy compared to single high-value satellites. Together, these drivers act like a reinforcing flywheel; lower costs enable larger constellations, larger constellations improve performance and coverage, and improved performance unlocks new commercial and institutional use cases, sustaining long-term market growth.

Introduction of LEO Satellite

The study conducted by BIS Research highlights that the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market represents one of the fastest-evolving segments of the global space economy. Operating at altitudes between 160 km and 2,000 km above Earth, LEO satellites enable high-speed data transmission, frequent Earth coverage, and low signal latency. These characteristics position LEO systems as critical infrastructure for modern digital services, ranging from broadband connectivity to real-time Earth observation. From a strategic standpoint, LEO innovation increasingly resembles a platform play; once orbital infrastructure is established, competitive advantage shifts to how efficiently data flows through the network and how seamlessly services integrate with terrestrial 5G/6G, cloud, and edge ecosystems.

Market Introduction

The low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market has been emerging as a transformative segment of the global space and telecommunications industry, driven by the need for high-speed, low-latency, and globally accessible data services. Operating at altitudes between approximately 160 km and 2,000 km, LEO satellites enable faster signal transmission and higher revisit rates compared to traditional orbital systems, making them well-suited for applications such as broadband connectivity, Earth observation, and real-time data analytics. Industry momentum is supported by structural cost reductions, with launch costs per kilogram declining by nearly 90% over the past two decades and small satellites accounting for more than 70% of annual satellite deployments. Technological advancements, including software-defined payloads, laser inter-satellite links capable of exceeding 100 Gbps, and cloud-integrated ground infrastructure, are allowing LEO constellations to function like dense digital networks rather than isolated space assets. Much like an express transit system layered over existing roads, LEO satellite networks shorten the distance between data source and user, creating a scalable orbital infrastructure that is reshaping how connectivity and geospatial intelligence are delivered worldwide.

Industrial Impact

LEO satellites are already reshaping multiple industries because they turn space into high-frequency, low-latency infrastructure rather than occasional, "boutique" missions. The biggest industrial impact is in connectivity-dependent sectors; LEO broadband typically delivers tens of milliseconds of latency (Speedtest/Ookla reporting shows median Starlink latency often in the ~38-45 ms range across measured regions), which enables cloud apps, voice/video, and real-time coordination in places where fiber is impractical.

Market Segmentation

Segmentation 1: by Application

• Communication
• Earth Observation and Remote Sensing
• Navigation and Positioning
• Others

Communication to Dominate the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market (by Application)

In the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market, the communication segment is expected to dominate the market because it is the only application category that scales simultaneously on constellation size, recurring subscription revenue, and mass-market demand. First, the largest LEO deployments are being built primarily for broadband and direct connectivity, with mega-constellation analyses showing broadband connectivity as a strong proxy for where LEO capacity and capital are concentrated.

Segmentation 2: by End User

• Commercial
• Government and Military

Commercial to Dominate the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market (by End User)

Commercial end users are expected to dominate the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market because they generate the greatest repeatable demand and recurring revenue across broadband, mobility, and enterprise connectivity use cases that scale with every additional user terminal, aircraft, vessel, or remote site connected. A clear signal is the real-world expansion of LEO broadband platforms; reporting in late 2025 cites Starlink serving ~8 million users across 150+ markets, and upstream suppliers (like STMicroelectronics) publicly tie multi-billion component volumes to growing commercial terminal demand evidence of a large, expanding commercial base pulling the ecosystem (satellite production, launches, ground gateways, terminals) toward consumer and enterprise connectivity at scale.

Segmentation 3: by Satellite Type

• Small Satellites (Less than 500 Kg)
• Medium Satellites (500 to 1,000 Kg)
• Large Satellites (Above 1,000 Kg)

Medium Satellites to Dominate the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market (by Satellite Type)

Medium satellites (500 to 1,000 kg) are playing an increasingly important role in the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market due to their balanced capabilities and cost-effectiveness. These satellites offer greater payload capacity and more advanced functionalities compared to small satellites, making them suitable for a wide range of applications, including communication, Earth observation, and scientific research. The growing demand for enhanced satellite services, such as high-resolution imaging and reliable communication, is driving the adoption of medium satellites. Additionally, the reduction in launch costs and the ability to support multiple missions are accelerating the growth of this segment. Medium satellites are contributing to the expansion of the LEO satellite market by bridging the gap between smaller and larger satellite types, enabling more complex and scalable solutions for various industries.

Segmentation 4: by Region

• North America: U.S., Canada
• Europe: Germany, U.K., France, and Rest-of-Europe
• Asia-Pacific: China, Japan, India, South Korea, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
• Rest-of-the-World: South America and the Middle East and Africa

North America is widely expected to lead the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market because it combines the strongest commercial scale, launch cadence, and institutional demand in one region. The U.S. hosts and funds many of the ecosystem's growth engines, mega-constellation operators, and their supply chains, while global deployment trends are being shaped by satellite broadband constellations dominated by major players such as SpaceX (U.S.) (with OneWeb as another large operator) and the broader surge in LEO broadband rollouts.

Demand - Drivers, Limitations, and Opportunities

Market Demand Drivers: Growing Demand for Satellite Broadband and Global Connectivity

The escalating demand for seamless, global connectivity is a pivotal catalyst propelling the expansion of the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market, by enabling transformative applications that terrestrial networks are ill-equipped to support. A primary impetus is the imperative to provide robust connectivity for remote and mobile assets, exemplified by the maritime industry. By the close of 2024, LEO solutions such as Starlink connected over 75,000 vessels, empowering leading shipping enterprises like Maersk to execute sophisticated digital fleet management initiatives and convert ships into fully equipped "floating offices." This compelling need for operational reliability has prompted even historically cost-conscious maritime stakeholders to embrace LEO technologies. Furthermore, the market has been underpinned by the essential demand for resilient communications infrastructure that sustains performance amid terrestrial network disruptions. For example, in the wake of Hurricanes Helene and Milton in 2024, organizations including Help.NGO and Intelsat swiftly implemented hybrid GEO-LEO satellite deployments to reinstate vital communications for search, rescue, and coordination operations mere hours after impact. Comparable satellite interventions were mobilized during the 2023 Maui wildfires and the 2025 Cyclone Alfred in Australia, affirming the technology's efficacy in extreme environmental challenges.

Market Challenges: Technical Complexity and Limited Coverage Challenges in LEO Systems

The low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market is expanding rapidly, offering promising solutions for global communication, internet services, and Earth observation. However, one of the key challenges faced by this market is the technical complexity associated with LEO systems. Operating at altitudes ranging from 160 to 2,000 kilometres, these satellites must navigate a host of technical obstacles, including frequent orbital adjustments and maintaining a stable connection with ground stations. This requires the integration of cutting-edge technologies such as high-throughput communication systems, advanced propulsion mechanisms, and precise orbit control. Moreover, the need for frequent satellite launches and the continuous maintenance of satellite fleets adds to both operational costs and technical risks.

In addition to technical complexity, limited coverage is another significant challenge in LEO systems. Due to their proximity to Earth, LEO satellites have a smaller coverage footprint compared to geostationary satellites. As a result, they can only cover a portion of the Earth's surface at any given time, requiring a constellation of satellites to ensure continuous and global coverage. This necessitates the deployment of large, complex constellations that need to be regularly replenished to maintain operational capacity. The challenge of coordinating such constellations, along with ensuring seamless handovers between satellites, becomes a critical factor in delivering uninterrupted services. The combination of high technical demands and limited coverage capabilities makes LEO satellite systems cost-intensive and difficult to scale. For companies operating in this sector, overcoming these challenges is essential to achieving long-term profitability and delivering reliable global connectivity, especially in remote or underserved regions.

Market Opportunities: Rising Adoption of Software-Defined and Reconfigurable Payloads

The rising adoption of software-defined and reconfigurable payloads presents a significant opportunity in the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market. These advanced payloads offer enhanced flexibility and operational efficiency by allowing satellite functions to be reprogrammed or reconfigured in orbit. Unlike traditional payloads, which are fixed in their functionality, software-defined payloads can adapt to changing mission requirements, enabling operators to optimize satellite performance based on real-time needs.

This adaptability allows for the efficient management of satellite resources and the ability to provide a variety of services without the need for new hardware or satellite launches. As a result, satellite operators can offer more dynamic services, such as customized communication channels, data transmission optimization, and improved bandwidth management. This flexibility also reduces the need for frequent satellite upgrades or replacements, lowering operational costs and extending the lifecycle of the satellite fleet.

Additionally, the growing demand for high-throughput communication, global connectivity, and Earth observation data in diverse sectors, such as telecommunications, defense, and environmental monitoring, creates a strong market opportunity. Software-defined payloads can meet these diverse needs efficiently, making them a compelling choice for companies looking to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market. As the industry continues to embrace this technology, the potential for cost savings, innovation, and scalability becomes increasingly attractive.

How can this report add value to an organization?

Product/Innovation Strategy: A successful product and innovation strategy in the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market is increasingly centered on scalability, differentiation, and ecosystem integration rather than hardware novelty alone. Leading operators are prioritizing software-driven innovation, using software-defined payloads and network virtualization to upgrade performance in orbit without replacing satellites, thereby shortening innovation cycles and protecting capital investment. Product strategies emphasize tiered connectivity offerings from consumer broadband to enterprise, aviation, maritime, and government services, allowing the same constellation to monetize multiple demand layers with different price sensitivities. Innovation is also focused on direct-to-device capabilities, which remove the need for specialized user terminals and dramatically expand the addressable market, similar to how smartphones accelerated mobile internet adoption. In parallel, investments in laser inter-satellite links, AI-based network optimization, and automated collision avoidance are improving throughput, latency, and operational resilience.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: A strong growth and marketing strategy for the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market is built around rapid adoption, trust in performance, and expansion across high-value use cases rather than broad, undifferentiated reach. Leading players focus first on commercial scalability, targeting underserved and remote regions where terrestrial networks are limited, then expanding into mobility segments such as aviation, maritime, and logistics that value reliability over price. Marketing narratives emphasize quantifiable performance metrics, latency below 50 milliseconds, global coverage, and high uptime because enterprise and government buyers respond to measurable outcomes rather than abstract technology claims. Growth is further accelerated through partnership-led distribution, including alliances with telecom operators, aircraft manufacturers, shipping fleets, and cloud service providers, which function like on-ramps feeding users into the orbital network. Analogous to how streaming platforms grew by bundling with broadband plans, LEO providers use hardware subsidies, service bundles, and tiered pricing to reduce adoption friction and increase lifetime value. As the market matures, growth strategies increasingly shift toward customer retention and upselling data-rich services, positioning LEO connectivity as a long-term digital infrastructure utility rather than a niche satellite solution.

Competitive Strategy: The report profiles major players in the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market, including polymer manufacturers, technology providers, and integrators. A detailed competitive landscape analysis covering strategic partnerships, agreements, and technological collaborations has been provided to help stakeholders identify untapped revenue opportunities. This analysis supports market participants in enhancing their position through innovation, strategic alliances, and a focus on sustainability.

Research Methodology

Factors for Data Prediction and Modelling

• The base currency considered for the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market analysis is the US$. Currencies other than the US$ have been converted to the US$ for all statistical calculations, considering the average conversion rate for that particular year.
• The currency conversion rate has been taken from the historical exchange rate of the Oanda website.
• Nearly all the recent developments from January 2021 to October 2024 have been considered in this research study.
• The information rendered in the report is a result of in-depth primary interviews, surveys, and secondary analysis.
• Where relevant information was not available, proxy indicators and extrapolation were employed.
• Any economic downturn in the future has not been taken into consideration for the market estimation and forecast.
• Technologies currently used are expected to persist through the forecast with no major technological breakthroughs.

Market Estimation and Forecast

This research study involves the usage of extensive secondary sources, such as certified publications, articles from recognized authors, white papers, annual reports of companies, directories, and major databases, to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market.

The low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market engineering process involves the calculation of the market statistics, market size estimation, market forecast, market crackdown, and data triangulation (the methodology for such quantitative data processes has been explained in further sections). The primary research study has been undertaken to gather information and validate the market numbers for segmentation types and industry trends of the key players in the market.

Primary Research

The primary sources involve industry experts from the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market and various stakeholders in the ecosystem. Respondents such as CEOs, vice presidents, marketing directors, and technology and innovation directors have been interviewed to obtain and verify both qualitative and quantitative aspects of this research study.

The key data points taken from primary sources include:

• validation and triangulation of all the numbers and graphs
• validation of report segmentations and key qualitative findings
• understanding the competitive landscape
• validation of the numbers of various markets for the market type
• percentage split of individual markets for geographical analysis

Secondary Research

This research study involves the usage of extensive secondary research, directories, company websites, and annual reports. It also makes use of databases, such as Hoovers, Bloomberg, Businessweek, and Factiva, to collect useful and effective information for an extensive, technical, market-oriented, and commercial study of the global market. In addition to the data sources, the study has been undertaken with the help of other data sources and websites, such as the Euroconsult, Space-Track.org, and Seradata.

Secondary research has been done to obtain crucial information about the industry's value chain, revenue models, the market's monetary chain, the total pool of key players, and the current and potential use cases and applications.

The key data points taken from secondary research include:

• segmentations and percentage shares
• data for market value
• key industry trends of the top players in the market
• qualitative insights into various aspects of the market, key trends, and emerging areas of innovation
• quantitative data for mathematical and statistical calculations

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The companies that are profiled in the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market have been selected based on inputs gathered from primary experts and by analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, and market penetration.

Some of the prominent names in the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market are:

• Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)
• Lockheed Martin Corporation
• Northrop Grumann Corporation
• Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
• Airbus SE
• Thales Alenia Space SAS
• L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
• China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC)
• AAC Clyde Space AB
• GomSpace Group AB
• NaraSpace Technologies Inc.
• Surrey Satellite Technologies

Companies that are not a part of the aforementioned pool have been well represented across different sections of the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite market report (wherever applicable).

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Scope and Definition

1 Market: Industry Outlook

• 1.1 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment
  • 1.1.1 Deployment of Large Constellations of Low Earth Orbit Satellites for Rising Global Communication Services
  • 1.1.2 Miniaturization of Satellites and Its Impact on the Market
  • 1.1.3 Integration of On-Board Compute and Edge Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on the Market
  • 1.1.4 5G / Non-Terrestrial Network Standardization and Telco Partnerships Enabling Direct-to-Device and Integrated Services and Its Impact on the Market
  • 1.1.5 Space Sustainability and Debris Mitigation Becoming Material Priorities
  • 1.1.6 Innovation in Electric Propulsion Systems
  • 1.1.7 Rising Traction of LEO Satellites to Provide Enhanced Space Imagery
  • 1.1.8 Advancements in Energy Storage Systems
  • 1.1.9 Spectrum Deals and Strategic Spectrum Moves
• 1.2 Supply Chain Overview
  • 1.2.1 Value Chain Analysis
• 1.3 Research and Development Review
  • 1.3.1 Patent Filing Trend (by Country and Company)
• 1.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 1.4.1 ITU, National Regulators, and Orbital Filing Frameworks
  • 1.4.2 3GPP NTN and Related Communication Standards
• 1.5 Case Study
  • 1.5.1 Wartime Connectivity in Ukraine - Low Earth Orbit Satellite Market
  • 1.5.2 Disaster Response in Florida, U.S. - Low Earth Orbit Satellite Market
  • 1.5.3 Rural Broadband for Arctic Communities - Low Earth Orbit Satellite Market
• 1.6 Market Dynamics Overview
  • 1.6.1 Market Drivers
    • 1.6.1.1 Growing Demand for Satellite Broadband and Global Connectivity
    • 1.6.1.2 Expansion of Earth Observation, Remote Sensing, and Data Analytics
  • 1.6.2 Market Challenges
    • 1.6.2.1 Technical Complexity and Limited Coverage Challenges in LEO Systems
    • 1.6.2.2 Regulatory and Licensing Constraints
  • 1.6.3 Market Opportunities
    • 1.6.3.1 Rising Adoption of Software-Defined and Reconfigurable Payloads
    • 1.6.3.2 Technological Advancements in Antennas, Ground Segment, and User Terminals

2 LEO-Based Communication Networks (B5G/NTN) Analysis

• 2.1 Overview of LEO-Based Communication Networks
  • 2.1.1 Role of LEO Satellites in Beyond-5G/5G-Advanced and NTN Architectures
  • 2.1.2 Service Models: Broadband, Direct-to-Device, IoT, Backhaul, and Enterprise Connectivity
• 2.2 Satellite Architecture and Technology for LEO Communications Constellations
  • 2.2.1 Platform and Orbit Strategy (Bus, Power, Propulsion, Orbit Selection) - High-Level View
  • 2.2.2 Communications Payload Capabilities (Beamforming, Throughput, Flexibility)
  • 2.2.3 Frequency Bands for LEO Communications (L, S, C, Ku, Ka, V, and Beyond)
  • 2.2.4 Antenna Systems (Onboard, Phased Arrays, and User-Terminal Interfaces)
  • 2.2.5 Communication Chips and Semiconductors
    • 2.2.5.1 Chip Architecture and Functionality (RF Front-End, Baseband, SoCs)
    • 2.2.5.2 Semiconductor Materials and Technology (Si, SiGe, GaN, GaAs, etc.)
  • 2.2.6 Supply Chain and Manufacturing
    • 2.2.6.1 Key Communication Chip and RF Component Suppliers
    • 2.2.6.2 Fabrication Models (IDM, Fabless, Foundries, OSAT)
    • 2.2.6.3 Supply Chain Risks, Bottlenecks, and Lead-Time Issues
  • 2.2.7 On-Board Computing and Edge AI for LEO Networks
• 2.3 Network and NTN Integration Aspects
  • 2.3.1 3GPP NTN Compliance and Integration with 5G/5G-Advanced Cores
  • 2.3.2 Latency, Throughput, and QoS Considerations in LEO Networks
  • 2.3.3 Handover and Mobility Management (Inter Satellite and Satellite Ground)
  • 2.3.4 Interoperability with Terrestrial Networks and Hybrid Architectures
  • 2.3.5 Direct-to-Device (D2D) and Direct-to-Cell Capability
  • 2.3.6 Edge/On-Board Processing for Traffic Optimization and Offload
• 2.4 Ecosystem and Supply Chain for LEO-Based Communication Networks
  • 2.4.1 Component Suppliers
    • 2.4.1.1 Semiconductor and RF Component Vendors
    • 2.4.1.2 Antenna and Payload Equipment Suppliers
  • 2.4.2 Prime Contractors and Constellation Operators
  • 2.4.3 Ground Segment (Gateway Stations, User Terminals, Cloud/Edge Integration)
  • 2.4.4 Launch and In-Orbit Operations Service Providers
• 2.5 Regulatory and Policy Landscape for LEO-Based Communication Networks
  • 2.5.1 Spectrum Licensing, Orbital Filing, and Coordination
  • 2.5.2 Cybersecurity, Data Protection, and Sovereignty Considerations
  • 2.5.3 Export Controls and National Security Regulations
• 2.6 Program Landscape and Case Examples
  • 2.6.1 Current LEO Communications Constellations (e.g., Starlink, OneWeb, Others - Overview)
  • 2.6.2 Emerging Direct-to-Device and NTN Programs
  • 2.6.3 Regional Initiatives and Public-Private Partnerships in LEO Communications

3 Application

• 3.1 Application Summary
• 3.2 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market (by Application)
  • 3.2.1 Communication
  • 3.2.2 Earth Observation and Remote Sensing
  • 3.2.3 Navigation and Positioning
  • 3.2.4 Others
• 3.3 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market (by End User)
  • 3.3.1 Commercial
  • 3.3.2 Government and Military

4 Products

• 4.1 Product Summary
• 4.2 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market (by Satellite Type)
  • 4.2.1 Small Satellites (Less than 500kg)
  • 4.2.2 Medium Satellites (500 to 1,000 kg)
  • 4.2.3 Large Satellites (Above 1,000 kg)

5 Region

• 5.1 Regional Summary
• 5.2 Global Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellite Market - by Region
• 5.3 North America
  • 5.3.1 Regional Overview
    • 5.3.1.1 Driving Factors for Market Growth
    • 5.3.1.2 Factors Challenging the Market
  • 5.3.2 Application
  • 5.3.3 Product
  • 5.3.4 North America (By Country)
    • 5.3.4.1 U.S.
      • 5.3.4.1.1 Application
      • 5.3.4.1.2 Product
    • 5.3.4.2 Canada
      • 5.3.4.2.1 Application
      • 5.3.4.2.2 Product
• 5.4 Europe
  • 5.4.1 Regional Overview
    • 5.4.1.1 Driving Factors for Market Growth
    • 5.4.1.2 Factors Challenging the Market
  • 5.4.2 Application
  • 5.4.3 Product
  • 5.4.4 Europe (By Country)
    • 5.4.4.1 Germany
      • 5.4.4.1.1 Application
      • 5.4.4.1.2 Product
    • 5.4.4.2 France
      • 5.4.4.2.1 Application
      • 5.4.4.2.2 Product
    • 5.4.4.3 U.K.
      • 5.4.4.3.1 Application
      • 5.4.4.3.2 Product
    • 5.4.4.4 Rest-of-Europe
      • 5.4.4.4.1 Application
      • 5.4.4.4.2 Product
• 5.5 Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.1 Regional Overview
    • 5.5.1.1 Driving Factors for Market Growth
    • 5.5.1.2 Factors Challenging the Market
  • 5.5.2 Application
  • 5.5.3 Product
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific (By Country)
    • 5.5.4.1 China
      • 5.5.4.1.1 Application
      • 5.5.4.1.2 Product
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
      • 5.5.4.2.1 Application
      • 5.5.4.2.2 Product
    • 5.5.4.3 India
      • 5.5.4.3.1 Application
      • 5.5.4.3.2 Product
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
      • 5.5.4.4.1 Application
      • 5.5.4.4.2 Product
    • 5.5.4.5 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
      • 5.5.4.5.1 Application
      • 5.5.4.5.2 Product
• 5.6 Rest-of-the-World
  • 5.6.1 Regional Overview
    • 5.6.1.1 Driving Factors for Market Growth
    • 5.6.1.2 Factors Challenging the Market
  • 5.6.2 Application
  • 5.6.3 Product
  • 5.6.4 Rest-of-the-World (By Region)
    • 5.6.4.1 South America
      • 5.6.4.1.1 Application
      • 5.6.4.1.2 Product
    • 5.6.4.2 Middle East and Africa
      • 5.6.4.2.1 Application
      • 5.6.4.2.2 Product

6 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles

• 6.1 Key Communication Chip and RF Component Manufacturing Companies
• 6.2 Company Profiles
  • 6.2.1 Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)
    • 6.2.1.1 Overview
    • 6.2.1.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.1.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.1.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.1.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.1.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.2 Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • 6.2.2.1 Overview
    • 6.2.2.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.2.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.2.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.2.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.2.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.3 Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • 6.2.3.1 Overview
    • 6.2.3.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.3.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.3.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.3.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.3.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.4 Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
    • 6.2.4.1 Overview
    • 6.2.4.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.4.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.4.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.4.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.4.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.5 Airbus SE
    • 6.2.5.1 Overview
    • 6.2.5.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.5.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.5.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.5.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.5.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.6 Thales Alenia Space SAS
    • 6.2.6.1 Overview
    • 6.2.6.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.6.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.6.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.6.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.6.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.7 L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
    • 6.2.7.1 Overview
    • 6.2.7.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.7.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.7.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.7.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.7.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.8 China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC)
    • 6.2.8.1 Overview
    • 6.2.8.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.8.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.8.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.8.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.8.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.9 AAC Clyde Space AB
    • 6.2.9.1 Overview
    • 6.2.9.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.9.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.9.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.9.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.9.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.10 GomSpace Group AB
    • 6.2.10.1 Overview
    • 6.2.10.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.10.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.10.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.10.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.10.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.11 Nara Space Technology Inc.
    • 6.2.11.1 Overview
    • 6.2.11.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.11.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.11.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.11.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.11.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.12 Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd (SSTL)
    • 6.2.12.1 Overview
    • 6.2.12.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
    • 6.2.12.3 Top Competitors
    • 6.2.12.4 Target Customers
    • 6.2.12.5 Key Personnel
    • 6.2.12.6 Analyst View
  • 6.2.13 List of Other Key Companies in the Ecosystem

7 Research Methodology

• 7.1 Data Sources
  • 7.1.1 Primary Data Sources
  • 7.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
  • 7.1.3 Data Triangulation
• 7.2 Market Estimation and Forecast