½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1607757

¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå(Ư¼ºº°, ±â¼úº°, ´ë»ó ÀÛ¹°º°, ´ë»ó °¡°ø½Äǰº°, Áö¿ªº°) : µ¿Ç⠺м®, °æÀï ±¸µµ, ¿¹Ãø(2019-2030³â)

Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market, By Trait; By Technology; By Crop Tested; By Processed Food Tested; By Region, Global Trend Analysis, Competitive Landscape & Forecast, 2019-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: Blueweave Consulting | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 535 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 2-3ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    



¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀº 2030³â±îÁö 32¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ µµ´Þ

¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀº GM ÀÛ¹°ÀÇ µµÀÔ Áõ°¡, ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°ÇÀÇ ¾ö°ÝÈ­, ¼ÒºñÀÚ ÀǽÄÀÇ Çâ»ó, °Ë»ç ±â¼úÀÇ Áøº¸¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¹ø¿µÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¼±µµÀûÀÎ Àü·« ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ°ú ½ÃÀå Á¶»ç ±â¾÷ÀÎ BlueWeave ConsultingÀº ÃÖ±Ù Á¶»ç¿¡¼­ ¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¸¦ 2023³â¿¡ 20¾ï 1,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ÃßÁ¤Çß½À´Ï´Ù. 2024-2030³âÀÇ ¿¹Ãø ±â°£ Áß ¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â CAGR 8.34%ÀÇ ÇöÀúÇÑ ¼ºÀåÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇϸç 2030³â¿¡´Â 32¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯ ±Ô¸ð¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î BlueWeave´Â ¿¹ÃøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î´Â ½Äǰ »ê¾÷¿¡¼­ À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü»ý¹°Ã¼(GMO) äÅà Áõ°¡, ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ÒºñÀÚÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä Áõ°¡, GMO ¶óº§¸µ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ ¿ä°Ç °­È­ µîÀ» ²ÅÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »ý¸í°øÇÐ ¹× ºÐÀÚ ±â¼úÀÇ ¹ßÀü°ú ÇÔ²² À¯ÀüÀÚ º¯Çü ½ÄǰÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Á¤È®ÇÏ°í ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϸ鼭 ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå¿¡ ´õ¿í ¹ÚÂ÷¸¦ °¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½Äǰ³» À¯ÀüÀÚ º¯Çü ÀÛ¹°ÀÇ Á¸À縦 Æò°¡ÇÏ°í ½Äǰ °ø±Þ¸Á¿¡¼­ À¯ÀüÀÚ º¯Çü ÀÛ¹°°ú °ü·ÃµÈ °Ç°­, ȯ°æ ¿µÇâ ¹× À±¸®Àû °í·Á»çÇ׿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ì·Á¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀ» ÁÖµµÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±âȸ - ³ó¾÷¿¡¼­ ±â¼ú ¹ßÀüÀÇ Ã¤Åà Áõ°¡

¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀº ³ó¾÷ ±â¼ú ¹ßÀü¿¡ µû¸¥ ±â¼ú ¹ßÀüÀÌ È®´ëµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼ºÀåÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù. Á¤¹Ð³ó¾÷, »ç¹°ÀÎÅͳÝ(IoT), ³ó¾÷¿ë µå·Ð, ÀΰøÁö´É(AI), ¸Ó½Å·¯´×(ML)Àº ³ó¾÷ ±â¼ú(Agri-Tech)ÀÇ ÀϺÎÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ³ó¾÷ ±â¼úÀº Àü ¼¼°è GM ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÇèÀÇ ÆÇµµ¸¦ ¹Ù²Ù´Â µ¥ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿©·¯ ¼¾¼­¿¡¼­ ¼öÁýµÈ ´Ù¾çÇÑ À¯ÇüÀÇ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© À¯ÀüÀÚº¯ÇüÀÛ¹°(GMO)ÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» Å×½ºÆ®ÇÒ ¼ö Àֱ⠶§¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû ±äÀå Áõ°¡°¡ ¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

·¯½Ã¾Æ-¿ìÅ©¶óÀ̳ª ÀüÀï°ú °°Àº ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû ±äÀåÀÇ °ÝÈ­´Â Àü ¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºÐÀïÀº °ø±Þ¸Á¿¡ È¥¶õÀ» ¾ß±âÇϰí, À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü ½ÄǰÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç Àåºñ¿Í ÀÚ¿øÀÇ °¡¿ë¼º ¹× À¯Åë¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹«¿ª °ü°è¿Í Á¤Ä¡Àû ºÒ¾ÈÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ ºÒÈ®½Ç¼ºÀº ½ÃÀåÀÇ º¯µ¿¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̰í ÅõÀÚÀÚµéÀÇ ½Å·Ú¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû ±äÀåÀº ¶ÇÇÑ ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ÀÇ °¨½Ã °­È­¿Í ¹«¿ª Á¤Ã¥ÀÇ º¯È­·Î À̾îÁú ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â GM ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü °Ë»ç ¼­ºñ½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä¿¡ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è ³ó»ê¹° ¹«¿ª¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â »ê¾÷Àº ƯÈ÷ Ãë¾àÇϸç, ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû °ü°èÀÇ È¥¶õÀº À¯ÀüÀÚ º¯Çü ÀÛ¹°ÀÇ Ã¤Åðú ¼ö¿ëÀ» ¹æÇØÇÏ°í ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇп¡ ´õ ¸¹Àº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ¼¼°è GM ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀº ¼¼°è ±Ô¸ðÀÇ Á¤Ä¡Àû, °æÁ¦Àû ¿äÀÎÀÇ º¹ÀâÇÑ »óÈ£ ÀÛ¿ëÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ µµÀü°ú º¯µ¿¿¡ Á÷¸é ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

PCR ±â¼úÀÌ ¼¼°è GM ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀ» ¼±µµÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁßÇÕÈ¿¼Ò¿¬¼â¹ÝÀÀ(PCR)Àº Àü ¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Àå Å« ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²À» Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â ½Äǰ³» À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü °ËÃâ ¹× ºÐ¼®¿¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, PCRÀÌ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÕ´Ï´Ù. PCRÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ Ã¤ÅÃÀº Àü ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü Ç¥ÁØÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, PCRÀÇ Á߿伺À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, À¯ÀüÀÚ º¯Çü ½ÄǰÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ±âº» ±â¼ú·Î ÀÚ¸®¸Å±èÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°æÀï ±¸µµ

¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀº °æÀïÀÌ Ä¡¿­ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷À¸·Î´Â Monsanto, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Emsul Analytical, Eurofins Scientific, Genetic Idna, IfpInstitut fur Produktqualitat GmbH, Intertek Group Inc. OmicUsa, Romer Labs Division Holding GmbH, Sgs S.A., Silica, Thermo Fisher Scientific, SGS S.A., Bureau Veritas, ALS Limited, TUV SUD µîÀÌ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌµé ±â¾÷Àº ¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ÀÔÁö¸¦ ´õ¿í °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇØ R&D ÅõÀÚ È®´ë, ÀμöÇÕº´, ÇÕÀÛÅõÀÚ, Á¦ÈÞ, ¶óÀ̼±½Ì °è¾à, ½ÅÁ¦Ç° ¹× ¼­ºñ½º Ãâ½Ã µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àü·«À» ±¸»çÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚ ÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀå ÀáÀç·Â, ÇâÈÄ µ¿Çâ ¹× Åë°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Àüü ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð ¿¹ÃøÀ» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â ¿äÀο¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ¼¼°è À¯ÀüÀÚ ÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀåÀÇ Ãֽбâ¼ú µ¿Çâ°ú ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ÀÚ°¡ °ÇÀüÇÑ Àü·«Àû ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¾÷°è ÀλçÀÌÆ®À» Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÀÛ¼ºµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, °úÁ¦, °æÀï·Â¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­µµ ºÐ¼®ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ºÐ¼® ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©

Á¦2Àå °³¿ä

Á¦3Àå ¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ¾÷°èÀÇ ¹ë·ùüÀÎ ºÐ¼®
  • DROC ºÐ¼®
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
      • À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ ½ÄǰÀÇ ¼ö¿ä Áõ°¡
      • Å×Å©³î·¯Áö µ¿¹°ÀÌ ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Â º´¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ÒºñÀÚ ÀǽÄÀÇ Çâ»ó
    • ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
      • Á¤ºÎÀÇ Á¤Ã¥°ú ±¸»ó
      • À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ ÀÛ¹°¿¡ °ü·ÃµÈ ȯ°æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâ°ú Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º ¹®Á¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀǽÄÀÇ Çâ»ó
    • ±âȸ
      • ³ó¾÷±â¼úÀÇ Áøº¸
      • ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ÒºñÀÚ ¿ì·ÁÀÇ Áõ°¡
    • °úÁ¦
      • ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ Å×½ºÆ® ¹æ¹ýÀÇ °á¿©
  • ±â¼ú Áøº¸/ÃÖ±Ù µ¿Çâ
  • ±ÔÁ¦ ±¸Á¶
  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®

Á¦4Àå ¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå : °³¿ä

  • ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¿¹Ãø(2019-2030³â)
    • ±Ý¾× ±â¹Ý
  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú ¿¹Ãø
    • Ư¼ºº°
      • Á¦ÃÊÁ¦ ³»¼º
      • °ïÃæ ³»¼º
      • ½ºÅà Ư¼º
      • ±âŸ
    • ±â¼úº°
      • ÁßÇÕÈ¿¼Ò ¿¬¼â ¹ÝÀÀ(PCR)
      • ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î¾î·¹ÀÌ
      • ¸é¿ªÃøÁ¤
      • ±âŸ
    • ´ë»ó ÀÛ¹°º°
      • ¿Á¼ö¼ö
      • ´ëµÎ
      • À¯Ã¤/Ä«³î¶ó
      • °¨ÀÚ
      • ±âŸ(Å丶Åä, »çÅÁ¹«, ½Ò)
    • ´ë»ó °¡°ø½Äǰº°
      • º£ÀÌÄ¿¸®¡¤Á¦°ú
      • À°·ù¡¤À°·ù Á¦Ç°
      • ¾ÆÄ§½Ä»ç¿ë ½Ã¸®¾ó¡¤½º³¼
      • ½Äǰ÷°¡Á¦
      • ±âŸ °¡°ø½Äǰ(À¯¾Æ¿ë ½Äǰ, À¯Á¦Ç°, °¡°ø À½·á)
    • Áö¿ªº°
      • ºÏ¹Ì
      • À¯·´
      • ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç(APAC)
      • ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«(LATAM)
      • Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«(MEA)

Á¦5Àå ºÏ¹ÌÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¿¹Ãø(2019-2030³â)
    • ±Ý¾× ±â¹Ý
  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú ¿¹Ãø
    • Ư¼ºº°
    • ±â¼úº°
    • ´ë»ó ÀÛ¹°º°
    • ´ë»ó °¡°ø½Äǰº°
    • ±¹°¡º°
      • ¹Ì±¹
      • ij³ª´Ù

Á¦6Àå À¯·´ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¿¹Ãø(2019-2030³â)
    • ±Ý¾× ±â¹Ý
  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú ¿¹Ãø
    • Ư¼ºº°
    • ±â¼úº°
    • ´ë»ó ÀÛ¹°º°
    • ´ë»ó °¡°ø½Äǰº°
    • ±¹°¡º°
      • µ¶ÀÏ
      • ¿µ±¹
      • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
      • ÇÁ¶û½º
      • ½ºÆäÀÎ
      • º§±â¿¡
      • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
      • ³×´ú¶õµå
      • ±âŸ À¯·´

Á¦7Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¿¹Ãø(2019-2030³â)
    • ±Ý¾× ±â¹Ý
  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú ¿¹Ãø
    • Ư¼ºº°
    • ±â¼úº°
    • ´ë»ó ÀÛ¹°º°
    • ´ë»ó °¡°ø½Äǰº°
    • ±¹°¡º°
      • Áß±¹
      • Àεµ
      • ÀϺ»
      • Çѱ¹
      • È£ÁÖ¡¤´ºÁú·£µå
      • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
      • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
      • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
      • º£Æ®³²
      • APAC ±âŸ ±¹°¡

Á¦8Àå ¶óÆ¾¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¿¹Ãø(2019-2030³â)
    • ±Ý¾× ±â¹Ý
  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú ¿¹Ãø
    • Ư¼ºº°
    • ±â¼úº°
    • ´ë»ó ÀÛ¹°º°
    • ´ë»ó °¡°ø½Äǰº°
    • ±¹°¡º°
      • ºê¶óÁú
      • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
      • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª
      • Æä·ç
      • ±âŸ ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«

Á¦9Àå Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå

  • ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ¿¹Ãø(2019-2030³â)
    • ±Ý¾× ±â¹Ý
  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú ¿¹Ãø
    • Ư¼ºº°
    • ±â¼úº°
    • ´ë»ó ÀÛ¹°º°
    • ´ë»ó °¡°ø½Äǰº°
    • ±¹°¡º°
      • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
      • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
      • īŸ¸£
      • Äí¿þÀÌÆ®
      • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
      • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
      • ¾ËÁ¦¸®
      • ±âŸ Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«

Á¦10Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷°ú Á¦Ç°ÀÇ ¸®½ºÆ®
  • ¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ±â¾÷ : ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®(2023³â)
  • °æÀï º¥Ä¡¸¶Å· : °æ¿µ ÆÄ¶ó¹ÌÅͺ°
  • ÁÖ¿ä Àü·« µµÀÔ »óȲ(±â¾÷ÀμöÇÕº´(M&A), »ç¾÷ Á¦ÈÞ)

Á¦11Àå ÁöÁ¤ÇÐÀû ±äÀåÀÇ Áõ°¡°¡ ¼¼°èÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀçÁ¶ÇÕ(GM) ½Äǰ ¾ÈÀü¼º °Ë»ç ½ÃÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Á¦12Àå ±â¾÷ °³¿ä(±â¾÷ °³¿ä, À繫 ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, °æÀï ±¸µµ, ±â¾÷ ÀÓ¿ø, ÁÖ¿ä °æÀï»ç, ¿¬¶ôó Á¤º¸, Àü·«Àû Àü¸Á)

  • Monsanto
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
  • Emsl Analytical Inc.
  • Eurofins Scientific Se
  • Genetic Id Na, Inc.
  • IfpInstitut fur Produktqualitat GmbH
  • Intertek Group Plc
  • OmicUsa Inc.
  • Romer Labs Division Holding GmbH, Sgs SA
  • Silliker, Inc.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific
  • SGS SA
  • Bureau Veritas SA
  • ALS Limited
  • TUV SUD
  • ±âŸ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷

Á¦13Àå ÁÖ¿ä Àü·«Àû Á¦¾È

Á¦14Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

KSA 24.12.18

Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market to Touch USD 3.25 Billion by 2030

Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market is flourishing due to the increasing adoption of GM crops, stringent regulatory requirements for food safety, growing awareness among consumers, and advancements in testing technologies.

BlueWeave Consulting, a leading strategic consulting and market research firm, in its recent study, estimated Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market size at USD 2.01 billion in 2023. During the forecast period between 2024 and 2030, BlueWeave expects Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market size to grow at a significant CAGR of 8.34% reaching a value of USD 3.25 billion by 2030. Major driving factors for Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market include increasing adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the food industry, rising awareness about food safety among consumers, and stringent regulatory requirements for GMO labeling. Also, the growing demand for accurate and reliable testing methods to ensure the safety of GM foods, coupled with advancements in biotechnology and molecular techniques, further propel market growth. The need for comprehensive testing solutions to assess the presence of GMOs in food products drives the market, addressing concerns related to health, environmental impact, and ethical considerations associated with genetically modified organisms in the food supply chain.

Opportunity - Rising Adoption of Technological Advancements in Farming

Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market is projected to expand with the growing adoption of technological advancements in farming techniques. Precision farming, internet of things (IoT), agricultural drones, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML) are part of agricultural technologies (agri-tech). Agri-tech plays a crucial role in transforming the landscape of Global GM Food Safety Testing, as analyses of captured various types of data from multiple sensors enable to test the safety of GMO crops.

Impact of Escalating Geopolitical Tensions on Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market

Escalating geopolitical tensions, such as Russia-Ukraine war, could significantly impact Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market. Conflicts disrupt supply chains, affecting the availability and distribution of testing equipment and resources essential for ensuring the safety of genetically modified foods. The market experiences heightened volatility due to uncertainties surrounding trade relations and political instability, impacting investor confidence. Geopolitical tensions may also lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and changes in trade policies, directly influencing the demand for GM food safety testing services. Industries reliant on global agricultural trade are particularly vulnerable, as disruptions in geopolitical relations can hinder the adoption and acceptance of genetically modified crops, further influencing the market dynamics. Consequently, Global GM Food Safety Testing Market may face challenges and fluctuations driven by the complex interplay of political and economic factors on a global scale.

PCR Technology Leads Global GM Food Safety Testing Market

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) accounts for the largest market share of Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market, reflecting its pivotal role in detecting and analyzing genetic modifications in food. PCR's precision and efficiency in amplifying DNA make it a cornerstone technology for ensuring the safety of genetically modified foods, driving its prominence within the market. Widespread adoption of PCR underscores its significance in maintaining food safety standards across the global landscape.

Competitive Landscape

Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market is fiercely competitive. Major companies in the market include Monsanto, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Emsl Analytical Inc., Eurofins Scientific Se, Genetic Id Na, Inc., IfpInstitut fur Produktqualitat GmbH, Intertek Group Plc., OmicUsa Inc., Romer Labs Division Holding GmbH, Sgs S.A., Silliker, Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, SGS S.A., Bureau Veritas S.A, ALS Limited, and TUV SUD. These companies use various strategies, including increasing investments in their R&D activities, mergers, and acquisitions, joint ventures, collaborations, licensing agreements, and new product and service releases to further strengthen their position in Global Genetically Modified Food Safety Testing Market.

The in-depth analysis of the report provides information about growth potential, upcoming trends, and statistics of Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market. It also highlights the factors driving forecasts of total Market size. The report promises to provide recent technology trends in Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market and industry insights to help decision-makers make sound strategic decisions. Further, the report also analyzes the growth drivers, challenges, and competitive dynamics of the market.

Table of Contents

1. Research Framework

  • 1.1. Research Objective
  • 1.2. Product Overview
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation

2. Executive Summary

3. Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market Insights

  • 3.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 3.2. DROC Analysis
    • 3.2.1. Growth Drivers
      • 3.2.1.1. Increasing demand for genetically modified foods
      • 3.2.1.2. Rising consumer awareness about the disease caused in Technology animals
    • 3.2.2. Restraints
      • 3.2.2.1. Government policies and initiatives
      • 3.2.2.2. Increasing awareness of environmental impacts and sustainability issues related to GM crops
    • 3.2.3. Opportunities
      • 3.2.3.1. Rising technical advancement in farming technique
      • 3.2.3.2. Increasing consumer concerns about food safety
    • 3.2.4. Challenges
      • 3.2.4.1. Lack of standardized testing methods globally
  • 3.3. Technology Advancements/Recent Developments
  • 3.4. Regulatory Framework
  • 3.5. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 3.5.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 3.5.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 3.5.3. Threat of New Entrants
    • 3.5.4. Threat of Substitutes
    • 3.5.5. Intensity of Rivalry

4. Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market Overview

  • 4.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019-2030
    • 4.1.1. By Value (USD Million)
  • 4.2. Market Share and Forecast
    • 4.2.1. By Trait
      • 4.2.1.1. Herbicide Tolerance
      • 4.2.1.2. Insect Resistance
      • 4.2.1.3. Stacked Traits
      • 4.2.1.4. Others
    • 4.2.2. By Technology
      • 4.2.2.1. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
      • 4.2.2.2. Microarray
      • 4.2.2.3. Immunoassay
      • 4.2.2.4. Others
    • 4.2.3. By Crop Tested
      • 4.2.3.1. Corn
      • 4.2.3.2. Soybean
      • 4.2.3.3. Rapeseed/Canola
      • 4.2.3.4. Potato
      • 4.2.3.5. Others (Tomato, Sugar Beet, and Rice)
    • 4.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 4.2.4.1. Bakery & Confectionery
      • 4.2.4.2. Meat & Meat Products
      • 4.2.4.3. Breakfast Cereals & Snacks
      • 4.2.4.4. Food Additive
      • 4.2.4.5. Other Processed Food (Infant Food, Dairy Products, and Processed Beverages)
    • 4.2.5. By Region
      • 4.2.5.1. North America
      • 4.2.5.2. Europe
      • 4.2.5.3. Asia Pacific (APAC)
      • 4.2.5.4. Latin America (LATAM)
      • 4.2.5.5. Middle East and Africa (MEA)

5. North America Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market

  • 5.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019-2030
    • 5.1.1. By Value (USD Million)
  • 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 5.2.1. By Trait
    • 5.2.2. By Technology
    • 5.2.3. By Crop Tested
    • 5.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
    • 5.2.5. By Country
      • 5.2.5.1. United States
      • 5.2.5.1.1. By Trait
      • 5.2.5.1.2. By Technology
      • 5.2.5.1.3. By Crop Tested
      • 5.2.5.1.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 5.2.5.2. Canada
      • 5.2.5.2.1. By Trait
      • 5.2.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 5.2.5.2.3. By Crop Tested
      • 5.2.5.2.4. By Processed Food Tested

6. Europe Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market

  • 6.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019-2030
    • 6.1.1. By Value (USD Million)
  • 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 6.2.1. By Trait
    • 6.2.2. By Technology
    • 6.2.3. By Crop Tested
    • 6.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
    • 6.2.5. By Country
      • 6.2.5.1. Germany
      • 6.2.5.1.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.1.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.1.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.1.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.2. United Kingdom
      • 6.2.5.2.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.2.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.3. Italy
      • 6.2.5.3.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.3.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.3.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.3.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.4. France
      • 6.2.5.4.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.4.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.4.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.4.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.5. Spain
      • 6.2.5.5.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.5.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.5.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.5.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.6. Belgium
      • 6.2.5.6.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.6.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.6.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.6.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.7. Russia
      • 6.2.5.7.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.7.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.7.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.7.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.8. The Netherlands
      • 6.2.5.8.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.8.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.8.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.8.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 6.2.5.9. Rest of Europe
      • 6.2.5.9.1. By Trait
      • 6.2.5.9.2. By Technology
      • 6.2.5.9.3. By Crop Tested
      • 6.2.5.9.4. By Processed Food Tested

7. Asia Pacific Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market

  • 7.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019-2030
    • 7.1.1. By Value (USD Million)
  • 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 7.2.1. By Trait
    • 7.2.2. By Technology
    • 7.2.3. By Crop Tested
    • 7.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
    • 7.2.5. By Country
      • 7.2.5.1. China
      • 7.2.5.1.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.1.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.1.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.1.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.2. India
      • 7.2.5.2.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.2.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.3. Japan
      • 7.2.5.3.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.3.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.3.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.3.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.4. South Korea
      • 7.2.5.4.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.4.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.4.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.4.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.5. Australia & New Zealand
      • 7.2.5.5.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.5.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.5.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.5.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.6. Indonesia
      • 7.2.5.6.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.6.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.6.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.6.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.7. Malaysia
      • 7.2.5.7.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.7.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.7.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.7.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.8. Singapore
      • 7.2.5.8.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.8.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.8.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.8.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.9. Vietnam
      • 7.2.5.9.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.9.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.9.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.9.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 7.2.5.10. Rest of APAC
      • 7.2.5.10.1. By Trait
      • 7.2.5.10.2. By Technology
      • 7.2.5.10.3. By Crop Tested
      • 7.2.5.10.4. By Processed Food Tested

8. Latin America Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market

  • 8.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019-2030
    • 8.1.1. By Value (USD Million)
  • 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 8.2.1. By Trait
    • 8.2.2. By Technology
    • 8.2.3. By Crop Tested
    • 8.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
    • 8.2.5. By Country
      • 8.2.5.1. Brazil
      • 8.2.5.1.1. By Trait
      • 8.2.5.1.2. By Technology
      • 8.2.5.1.3. By Crop Tested
      • 8.2.5.1.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 8.2.5.2. Mexico
      • 8.2.5.2.1. By Trait
      • 8.2.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 8.2.5.2.3. By Crop Tested
      • 8.2.5.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 8.2.5.3. Argentina
      • 8.2.5.3.1. By Trait
      • 8.2.5.3.2. By Technology
      • 8.2.5.3.3. By Crop Tested
      • 8.2.5.3.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 8.2.5.4. Peru
      • 8.2.5.4.1. By Trait
      • 8.2.5.4.2. By Technology
      • 8.2.5.4.3. By Crop Tested
      • 8.2.5.4.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 8.2.5.5. Rest of LATAM
      • 8.2.5.5.1. By Trait
      • 8.2.5.5.2. By Technology
      • 8.2.5.5.3. By Crop Tested
      • 8.2.5.5.4. By Processed Food Tested

9. Middle East & Africa Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market

  • 9.1. Market Size & Forecast, 2019-2030
    • 9.1.1. By Value (USD Million)
  • 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
    • 9.2.1. By Trait
    • 9.2.2. By Technology
    • 9.2.3. By Crop Tested
    • 9.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
    • 9.2.5. By Country
      • 9.2.5.1. Saudi Arabia
      • 9.2.5.1.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.1.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.1.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.1.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 9.2.5.2. UAE
      • 9.2.5.2.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.2.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.2.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.2.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 9.2.5.3. Qatar
      • 9.2.5.3.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.3.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.3.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.3.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 9.2.5.4. Kuwait
      • 9.2.5.4.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.4.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.4.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.4.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 9.2.5.5. South Africa
      • 9.2.5.5.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.5.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.5.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.5.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 9.2.5.6. Nigeria
      • 9.2.5.6.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.6.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.6.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.6.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 9.2.5.7. Algeria
      • 9.2.5.7.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.7.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.7.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.7.4. By Processed Food Tested
      • 9.2.5.8. Rest of MEA
      • 9.2.5.8.1. By Trait
      • 9.2.5.8.2. By Technology
      • 9.2.5.8.3. By Crop Tested
      • 9.2.5.8.4. By Processed Food Tested

10. Competitive Landscape

  • 10.1. List of Key Players and Their Offerings
  • 10.2. Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market Share Analysis, 2023
  • 10.3. Competitive Benchmarking, By Operating Parameters
  • 10.4. Key Strategic Developments (Mergers, Acquisitions, Partnerships, etc.)

11. Impact of Escalating Geopolitical Tensions on Global Genetically Modified (GM) Food Safety Testing Market

12. Company Profiles (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Competitive Landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, Strategic Outlook, and SWOT Analysis)

  • 12.1. Monsanto
  • 12.2. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
  • 12.3. Emsl Analytical Inc.
  • 12.4. Eurofins Scientific Se
  • 12.5. Genetic Id Na, Inc.
  • 12.6. IfpInstitut fur Produktqualitat GmbH
  • 12.7. Intertek Group Plc
  • 12.8. OmicUsa Inc.
  • 12.9. Romer Labs Division Holding GmbH, Sgs S.A.
  • 12.10. Silliker, Inc.
  • 12.11. Thermo Fisher Scientific
  • 12.12. SGS S.A.
  • 12.13. Bureau Veritas S.A
  • 12.14. ALS Limited
  • 12.15. TUV SUD
  • 12.16. Other Prominent Players

13. Key Strategic Recommendations

14. Research Methodology

  • 14.1. Qualitative Research
    • 14.1.1. Primary & Secondary Research
  • 14.2. Quantitative Research
  • 14.3. Market Breakdown & Data Triangulation
    • 14.3.1. Secondary Research
    • 14.3.2. Primary Research
  • 14.4. Breakdown of Primary Research Respondents, By Region
  • 14.5. Assumptions & Limitations

*Financial information of non-listed companies can be provided as per availability.

**The segmentation and the companies are subject to modifications based on in-depth secondary research for the final deliverable

ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦