|
시장보고서
상품코드
2016590
자극 재료 시장 보고서 : 유형, 기술, 용도, 지역별(2026-2034년)Stimulation Materials Market Report by Type (Proppants, Chemical), Technology (Hydraulic Fracturing, Acidization), Application (Onshore, Offshore), and Region 2026-2034 |
||||||
세계의 자극재 시장 규모는 2025년에 716억 달러에 달했습니다. 향후 IMARC Group은 2034년까지 시장 규모가 1,591억 달러에 달하며, 2026-2034년에 CAGR 9.00%로 성장할 것으로 예측하고 있습니다.
자극제는 석유 및 가스정에서 미생물을 주입하여 왁스나 아스팔텐과 같은 중질 성분의 침전물을 제거하기 위해 사용됩니다. 이들은 일반적으로 피복사, 생플랙, 점토계 세라믹, 소결 보크사이트 등의 프로판트로 구성되어 있습니다. 현재 주요 업체들은 파쇄 높이, 주입액 양, 우물 청소 작업의 필요성을 줄이기 위해 초경량 프로판트를 도입하고 있습니다. 또한 자극 처리 공정 및 석유 및 가스 유량을 향상시키기 위한 표준 및 맞춤형 화학 솔루션을 제공합니다. 이러한 솔루션에는 가교제, 분해제, 완충제, 점토 조절제, 계면활성제, 살균제, 마찰 감소제, 스케일 방지제, 겔화 시스템 등 첨단 통합 유체 시스템이 포함됩니다.
자극제 시장 동향:
연료 수요의 증가는 전 세계 셰일가스 이용에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 이는 탄화수소 저장층에서 수압파쇄 방식으로 셰일가스 채굴을 위한 세계 자극제 수요에 영향을 미치는 주요 요인 중 하나입니다. 또한 많은 국가의 정부는 수압파쇄법의 부작용을 최소화하기 위해 엄격한 규제를 도입하고 있습니다. 이에 따라 환경에 미치는 영향이 적은 친환경 소재의 채택이 촉진되고 있습니다. 이와 더불어 수평 시추, 고유량, 다단식 등 수압파쇄 기술의 발전과 셰일 자원의 개발이 진행되면서 시추 효율을 높이기 위한 새로운 자극재에 대한 수요가 증가하고 있습니다. 세계 석유 및 가스 가격의 급등도 기업이 자극 처리와 같은 첨단인 방법을 채택하는 데에 힘을 실어주고 있습니다. 또한 주요 업체들은 심부 가스 및 석유정 파쇄 작업에서 고온, 고폐쇄응력 환경에서도 열 안정성, 내화학성, 내파쇄성을 발휘하여 프로판 역류를 방지하는 제품을 출시하고 있습니다. 또한 물 사용량을 최소화하면서 우물의 생산성을 높이는 고부가가치 코팅 모래와 세라믹 프로판트도 제공하고 있습니다. 이러한 혁신 기술이 시장 성장을 촉진할 것으로 예상됩니다.
목차
제1장 서문
제2장 조사 범위와 조사 방법
제3장 개요
제4장 서론
제5장 세계의 자극 재료 시장
제6장 시장 내역 : 유형별
제7장 시장 내역 : 기술별
제8장 시장 내역 : 용도별
제9장 시장 내역 : 지역별
제10장 SWOT 분석
제11장 밸류체인 분석
제12장 Porter's Five Forces 분석
제13장 가격 분석
제14장 경쟁 구도
KSAThe global stimulation materials market size reached USD 71.6 Billion in 2025. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach USD 159.1 Billion by 2034, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 9.00 % during 2026-2034.
Stimulation materials are used in oil and gas wells to inject microbes and remove deposits of heavy components, such as wax and asphaltene. They generally comprise proppants, including coated sand, raw frac, clay-based ceramic, and sintered bauxite. Nowadays, leading manufacturers are introducing ultra-lightweight proppants that reduce frac height, injected fluids, and the need for wellbore cleanouts. They are also offering standard and customized chemical solutions for enhancing the stimulation process and the flow of oil and gas. These solutions include advanced integrated fluid systems like crosslinkers, breakers, buffers, clay control, surfactants, biocides, friction reducers, scale inhibitors, and gelling systems.
STIMULATION MATERIALS MARKET TRENDS:
The increasing need for fuel is positively influencing the use of shale gas worldwide. This represents one of the major factors influencing the demand for stimulation materials worldwide for extracting shale gas via hydraulic fracking in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Moreover, governments of numerous countries are implementing stringent regulations to minimize the negative effects of hydraulic fracking. This, in turn, is promoting the adoption of green materials with less impact on the environment. Apart from this, advances in hydraulic fracturing technology, such as horizontal drilling, high-volume, and multistage, along with the development of shale resources, are driving the demand for new stimulation materials to improve drilling efficiencies. The rising oil and gas prices worldwide are also encouraging companies to adopt advanced methods like stimulation. Furthermore, key manufacturers are introducing products that provide thermal stability and chemical and crush resistance and prevent proppant flow back in high-temperature and closure stress environments during the fracturing of deep gas and oil wells. They are also offering value-added coated sand and ceramic proppants that minimize water usage while increasing well productivity. These innovations are projected to impel the growth of the market.
KEY MARKET SEGMENTATION:
Breakup by Type:
- Proppants
- Frac Sand
- Resin Coated
- Ceramic
- Chemical
- Surfactants
- Gelling Agents
- Friction Reducers
- Breakers
- Crosslinking Agents
- Corrosion and Scale Inhibitors
- Biocides
- Others
Breakup by Technology:
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- Multistage Fracturing
- Re-fracturing
- Acidization
- Hydrochloric Acid Wash
- Matrix Acid Stimulation
- Acid Fracturing
Breakup by Application:
- Onshore
- Offshore
Breakup by Region:
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- South Korea
- Australia
- Indonesia
- Others
- Europe
- Germany
- France
- United Kingdom
- Italy
- Spain
- Russia
- Others
- Latin America
- Brazil
- Mexico
- Others
- Middle East and Africa
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE:
The competitive landscape of the industry has also been examined along with the profiles of the key players being Akzo Nobel N.V., Baker Hughes Company, BASF SE, Carbo Ceramics Inc., Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC, DuPont de Nemours Inc., Halliburton Company, Hexion Inc., Saint-Gobain S.A, Schlumberger Limited and Solvay S.A.
KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED IN THIS REPORT
1. How big is the stimulation materials market?
2. What is the future outlook of stimulation materials market?
3. What are the key factors driving the stimulation materials market?
4. Which are the leading companies in the global stimulation materials market?
Table of Contents
1 Preface
2 Scope and Methodology
- 2.1 Objectives of the Study
- 2.2 Stakeholders
- 2.3 Data Sources
- 2.3.1 Primary Sources
- 2.3.2 Secondary Sources
- 2.4 Market Estimation
- 2.4.1 Bottom-Up Approach
- 2.4.2 Top-Down Approach
- 2.5 Forecasting Methodology
3 Executive Summary
4 Introduction
- 4.1 Overview
- 4.2 Key Industry Trends
5 Global Stimulation Materials Market
- 5.1 Market Overview
- 5.2 Market Performance
- 5.3 Impact of COVID-19
- 5.4 Market Forecast
6 Market Breakup by Type
- 6.1 Proppants
- 6.1.1 Market Trends
- 6.1.2 Key Segments
- 6.1.2.1 Frac Sand
- 6.1.2.2 Resin Coated
- 6.1.2.3 Ceramic
- 6.1.3 Market Forecast
- 6.2 Chemical
- 6.2.1 Market Trends
- 6.2.2 Key Segments
- 6.2.2.1 Surfactants
- 6.2.2.2 Gelling Agents
- 6.2.2.3 Friction Reducers
- 6.2.2.4 Breakers
- 6.2.2.5 Crosslinking Agents
- 6.2.2.6 Corrosion and Scale Inhibitors
- 6.2.2.7 Biocides
- 6.2.2.8 Others
- 6.2.3 Market Forecast
7 Market Breakup by Technology
- 7.1 Hydraulic Fracturing
- 7.1.1 Market Trends
- 7.1.2 Key Segments
- 7.1.2.1 Multistage Fracturing
- 7.1.2.2 Re-fracturing
- 7.1.3 Market Forecast
- 7.2 Acidization
- 7.2.1 Market Trends
- 7.2.2 Key Segments
- 7.2.2.1 Hydrochloric Acid Wash
- 7.2.2.2 Matrix Acid Stimulation
- 7.2.2.3 Acid Fracturing
- 7.2.3 Market Forecast
8 Market Breakup by Application
- 8.1 Onshore
- 8.1.1 Market Trends
- 8.1.2 Market Forecast
- 8.2 Offshore
- 8.2.1 Market Trends
- 8.2.2 Market Forecast
9 Market Breakup by Region
- 9.1 North America
- 9.1.1 United States
- 9.1.1.1 Market Trends
- 9.1.1.2 Market Forecast
- 9.1.2 Canada
- 9.1.2.1 Market Trends
- 9.1.2.2 Market Forecast
- 9.1.1 United States
- 9.2 Asia-Pacific
- 9.2.1 China
- 9.2.1.1 Market Trends
- 9.2.1.2 Market Forecast
- 9.2.2 Japan
- 9.2.2.1 Market Trends
- 9.2.2.2 Market Forecast
- 9.2.3 India
- 9.2.3.1 Market Trends
- 9.2.3.2 Market Forecast
- 9.2.4 South Korea
- 9.2.4.1 Market Trends
- 9.2.4.2 Market Forecast
- 9.2.5 Australia
- 9.2.5.1 Market Trends
- 9.2.5.2 Market Forecast
- 9.2.6 Indonesia
- 9.2.6.1 Market Trends
- 9.2.6.2 Market Forecast
- 9.2.7 Others
- 9.2.7.1 Market Trends
- 9.2.7.2 Market Forecast
- 9.2.1 China
- 9.3 Europe
- 9.3.1 Germany
- 9.3.1.1 Market Trends
- 9.3.1.2 Market Forecast
- 9.3.2 France
- 9.3.2.1 Market Trends
- 9.3.2.2 Market Forecast
- 9.3.3 United Kingdom
- 9.3.3.1 Market Trends
- 9.3.3.2 Market Forecast
- 9.3.4 Italy
- 9.3.4.1 Market Trends
- 9.3.4.2 Market Forecast
- 9.3.5 Spain
- 9.3.5.1 Market Trends
- 9.3.5.2 Market Forecast
- 9.3.6 Russia
- 9.3.6.1 Market Trends
- 9.3.6.2 Market Forecast
- 9.3.7 Others
- 9.3.7.1 Market Trends
- 9.3.7.2 Market Forecast
- 9.3.1 Germany
- 9.4 Latin America
- 9.4.1 Brazil
- 9.4.1.1 Market Trends
- 9.4.1.2 Market Forecast
- 9.4.2 Mexico
- 9.4.2.1 Market Trends
- 9.4.2.2 Market Forecast
- 9.4.3 Others
- 9.4.3.1 Market Trends
- 9.4.3.2 Market Forecast
- 9.4.1 Brazil
- 9.5 Middle East and Africa
- 9.5.1 Market Trends
- 9.5.2 Market Breakup by Country
- 9.5.3 Market Forecast
10 SWOT Analysis
- 10.1 Overview
- 10.2 Strengths
- 10.3 Weaknesses
- 10.4 Opportunities
- 10.5 Threats
11 Value Chain Analysis
12 Porters Five Forces Analysis
- 12.1 Overview
- 12.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
- 12.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- 12.4 Degree of Competition
- 12.5 Threat of New Entrants
- 12.6 Threat of Substitutes
13 Price Analysis
14 Competitive Landscape
- 14.1 Market Structure
- 14.2 Key Players
- 14.3 Profiles of Key Players
- 14.3.1 Akzo Nobel N.V.
- 14.3.1.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.1.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.1.3 Financials
- 14.3.1.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.2 Baker Hughes Company
- 14.3.2.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.2.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.2.3 Financials
- 14.3.2.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.3 BASF SE
- 14.3.3.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.3.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.3.3 Financials
- 14.3.3.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.4 Carbo Ceramics Inc.
- 14.3.4.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.4.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.4.3 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.5 Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC
- 14.3.5.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.5.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.5.3 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.6 DuPont de Nemours Inc.
- 14.3.6.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.6.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.6.3 Financials
- 14.3.6.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.7 Halliburton Company
- 14.3.7.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.7.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.7.3 Financials
- 14.3.7.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.8 Hexion Inc.
- 14.3.8.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.8.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.9 Saint-Gobain S.A
- 14.3.9.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.9.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.9.3 Financials
- 14.3.9.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.10 Schlumberger Limited
- 14.3.10.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.10.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.10.3 Financials
- 14.3.10.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.11 Solvay S.A
- 14.3.11.1 Company Overview
- 14.3.11.2 Product Portfolio
- 14.3.11.3 Financials
- 14.3.11.4 SWOT Analysis
- 14.3.1 Akzo Nobel N.V.
