½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óÇ°ÄÚµå
1598427

¼¼°èÀÇ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå : À¯Çü, Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý, Àü°³, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ð, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚº° ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Threat Modeling Tools Market by Type (Services, Solutions), Methodology (Attack Tree, Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), DREAD), Deployment, Organization-Size, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 192 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀº 2023³â¿¡ 9¾ï 4,006¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú°í, 2024³â¿¡´Â 10¾ï 6,425¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸¦ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµÇ¸ç, CAGR 13.60%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 22¾ï 9,529¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÅøÀº »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò·Î, ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¹× ¿ëµµ ³»ÀÇ ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ º¸¾È À§ÇùÀ» ½Äº°, ¿¹Ãø ¹× ¿ÏÈ­Çϵµ·Ï ¼³°èµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¾ÇÀÇÀûÀÎ È°µ¿À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ±â¹Ð µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇÑ °ß°íÇÑ ¹æ¾î ¸ÞÄ¿´ÏÁòÀ» ¼ö¸³ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÏ´Â Á¶Á÷¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±× ¿ëµµ´Â µ¥ÀÌÅÍÀÇ ¹«°á¼º°ú ±â¹Ð¼ºÀÌ ÃÖ¿ì¼±ÀÎ ±ÝÀ¶, ÇコÄɾî, Á¤ºÎ±â°ü µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¾÷°è¿¡ °ÉÄ£ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÅøÀÇ ÃÖÁ¾ÀûÀÎ »ç¿ë¹üÀ§´Â IT º¸¾È ÆÀ, ¸®½ºÅ© °ü¸® ºÎ¼­, ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠´ã´çÀÚ ¹× Á¶Á÷ÀÇ º¸¾È ż¼¸¦ °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇØ ºÎ¼­¸¦ ³Ñ¾î¼­´Â È®»êÀ» º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁسâ(2023) 9¾ï 4,006¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø³â(2024) 10¾ï 6,425¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø³â(2030) 22¾ï 9,529¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 13.60%

À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀº ÁÖ·Î »çÀ̹ö °ø°ÝÀÇ ºóµµ¿Í Á¤±³ÇÔ Áõ°¡, GDPR(EU °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£±ÔÁ¤) ¹× HIPAA¿Í °°Àº ±ÔÁ¦ Áؼö¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ º¸È£ ´ëÃ¥ÀÇ Çʿ伺, ¾÷°è Àü¹ÝÀÇ µðÁöÅÐ Àüȯ äÅà Ȯ´ë¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °ßÀεǰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ µµÀÔ°ú °ü·ÃµÈ º¹À⼺°ú ºñ¿ë Áõ°¡´Â ¼ºÀåÀ» ¹æÇØÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä Á¦¾à Áß ÇϳªÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Å« °úÁ¦°¡ µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¦¾àÀÌ ÀÖÀ½¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ½ÃÀå¿¡´Â »õ·Î¿î ºñÁî´Ï½º ±âȸ°¡ »ý°Ü³ª°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Á¦½ÃÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Å¬¶ó¿ìµå ¼­ºñ½º¿Í »ç¹°ÀÎÅͳÝ(IoT) µð¹ÙÀ̽ºÀÇ µµÀÔÀÌ ÁøÇàµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó ÇÊ¿ä¿¡ ¸Â´Â º¸¾È ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ »ý°Ü À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÅøÀÇ Ä¿½ºÅ͸¶ÀÌ¡°ú ÅëÇÕÀÇ ¿©Áö°¡ ³Ð¾îÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¼ºÀåÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÏ´Â ±â¾÷ÀÇ °æ¿ì À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ »ç¿ë ÆíÀǼº°ú È®À强À» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ Á¶»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ Â÷º°È­ ¿äÀÎÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ È®Ãæ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÀÎÀû ÀÚ¿øÀÇ °úÁ¦¸¦ ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î, ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¿ªµ¿Àû ÀΠƯ¼ºÀº ¹ÎøÇÑ Çõ½Å Àü·«°ú ±âÁ¸ º¸¾È °úÁ¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇÏ°í ¹Ì·¡ÀÇ À§ÇùÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÌ°í »ç¿ëÀÚ Áß½ÉÀÇ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿¡ÀÇ ÁÖ·ÂÀ» ¿ä±¸ÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ: ºü¸£°Ô ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ® °ø°³

À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀº ¼ö¿ä ¹× °ø±ÞÀÇ ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ë¿¡ ÀÇÇØ º¯¸ð¸¦ ÀÌ·ç°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »õ·Î¿î ºñÁî´Ï½º ±âȸ¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µ¿ÇâÀ» Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î ÆľÇÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº Á¤Ä¡Àû, Áö¸®Àû, ±â¼úÀû, »çȸÀû, °æÁ¦ÀûÀÎ ¿µ¿ª¿¡ °ÉÄ£ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¸®½ºÅ©¸¦ °æ°¨ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½°ú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¼ÒºñÀÚ Çൿ°ú ±×°ÍÀÌ Á¦Á¶ ºñ¿ë°ú ±¸¸Å µ¿Çâ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» º¸´Ù ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°Ô ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

  • ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
    • »çÀ̹ö °ø°ÝÀÇ ±ÞÁõ°ú ³×Æ®¿öÅ© º¸¾È Ãë¾à¼ºÀ» È®ÀÎÇÒ Çʿ伺
    • Àü¼úÀû À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÅøÀÇ °³¹ßÀ» Àå·ÁÇÏ´Â Á¤ºÎÀÇ °è¹ß Ä·ÆäÀÎ
    • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í ¿ø°Ý ±Ù¹«ÀÚÀÇ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÀÌ¿ë ±ÞÁõ
  • ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
    • À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡ À־ÀÇ ±¸Çö»óÀÇ °áÇÔÀ̳ª ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃÄ»óÀÇ ¹ö±×¿¡ °üÇÑ ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃÄ»óÀÇ ¿ì·Á
  • ½ÃÀå ±âȸ
    • ÁÖ·Î AI/ML ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú ÀÚµ¿È­¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃá À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ±â¼úÀû Áøº¸
    • ¸ÂÃãÇü »ç¿ëÀÚ Á᫐ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÐ ½º¸¶Æ® ½ÃƼ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ÅõÀÚ
  • ½ÃÀåÀÇ °úÁ¦
    • À§ÇùÀÌ Æø¹ßÀûÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â À§Çè°ú À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÅøÀ» ½ÇÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¼÷·ÃµÈ »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È Àü¹®°¡ÀÇ ºÎÁ·

Porter's Five Forces: À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀ» Ž»öÇÏ´Â Àü·« µµ±¸

Porter's Five Forces ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©´Â À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå °æÀï ±¸µµ¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ µµ±¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¸íÈ®ÇÑ ±â¼úÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©´Â ±â¾÷ÀÌ ½ÃÀå ³» ¼¼·Âµµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í ½Å±Ô »ç¾÷ÀÇ ¼öÀͼºÀ» ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µË´Ï´Ù. ¸¦ ÇÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ´õ °­ÀÎÇÑ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ Æ÷Áö¼Å´×À» º¸Àå ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

PESTLE ºÐ¼® : À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ¿ÜºÎ·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ ¿µÇâ ÆľÇ

¿ÜºÎ °Å½ÃÀû ȯ°æ ¿äÀÎÀº À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼º°ú ¿ªÇÐÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ»ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¿µÇâÀ» Ž»öÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸ Á¦°ø PESTLE ¿äÀÎÀ» Á¶»çÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ À§Çè°ú ±âȸ¸¦ ´õ Àß ÀÌÇØÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óÇÑ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤À» ÇÒ Áغñ°¡ µÇ¾î ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼® : À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå °æÀï ±¸µµ ÆľÇ

À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀÇ »ó¼¼ÇÑ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ °ø±Þ¾÷üÀÇ ¼º°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ºÐ¼®Àº ½ÃÀå ÁýÁß, ´ÜÆíÈ­ ¹× ÅëÇÕ µ¿ÇâÀ» ¸íÈ®È÷ÇÏ°í º¥´õ´Â °æÀïÀÌ Ä¡¿­ ÇØÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÚ»çÀÇ ÁöÀ§¸¦ ³ôÀÌ´Â Àü·«Àû ÀÇ»ç °áÁ¤À» ³»¸®´Â µ¥ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Áö½ÄÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º : À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °ø±Þ¾÷üÀÇ ¼º´É Æò°¡

FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸®½º´Â À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °ø±Þ¾÷ü¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ µµ±¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿¡ µû¶ó °áÁ¤À» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ³× °¡Áö »çºÐ¸éÀ» ÅëÇØ º¥´õ¸¦ ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°í Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ºÐÇÒÇÏ°í Àü·« ¸ñÇ¥¿¡ °¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÑ ÆÄÆ®³Ê ¹× ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» ÆľÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àü·« ºÐ¼® ¹× ±ÇÀå : À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ¼º°ø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±æÀ» ±×¸³´Ï´Ù.

À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀåÀÇ Àü·« ºÐ¼®Àº ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇÁ·¹Á𽺠°­È­¸¦ ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÏ´Â ±â¾÷¿¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼ÒÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Á¢±Ù¹ýÀ» ÅëÇØ °æÀï ±¸µµ¿¡¼­ °úÁ¦¸¦ ±Øº¹ÇÏ°í »õ·Î¿î ºñÁî´Ï½º ±âȸ¸¦ È°¿ëÇÏ¿© Àå±âÀûÀÎ ¼º°øÀ» °ÅµÑ ¼ö Àִ üÁ¦¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ÁÖ¿ä °ü½É ºÐ¾ß¸¦ Æ÷°ýÇÏ´Â ½ÃÀåÀÇ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ºÐ¼®À» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

1. ½ÃÀå ħÅõ: ÇöÀç ½ÃÀå ȯ°æÀÇ »ó¼¼ÇÑ °ËÅä, ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ, ½ÃÀå µµ´Þ¹üÀ§ ¹× Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâ·Â Æò°¡.

2. ½ÃÀå °³Ã´µµ: ½ÅÈï ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼ºÀå ±âȸ¸¦ ÆľÇÇÏ°í ±âÁ¸ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ È®Àå °¡´É¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¸ç ¹Ì·¡ ¼ºÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû ·Îµå¸ÊÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

3. ½ÃÀå ´Ù¾çÈ­: ÃÖ±Ù Á¦Ç° Ãâ½Ã, ¹Ì°³Ã´ Áö¿ª, ¾÷°èÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä Áøº¸, ½ÃÀåÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

4. °æÀï Æò°¡ ¹× Á¤º¸ : °æÀï ±¸µµ¸¦ öÀúÈ÷ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À², »ç¾÷ Àü·«, Á¦Ç° Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À, ÀÎÁõ, ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ ½ÂÀÎ, ƯÇã µ¿Çâ, ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ ±â¼ú Áøº¸ µîÀ» °ËÁõÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

5. Á¦Ç° °³¹ß ¹× Çõ½Å : ¹Ì·¡ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» °¡¼ÓÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÇ´Â ÃÖ÷´Ü ±â¼ú, R&D È°µ¿, Á¦Ç° Çõ½ÅÀ» °­Á¶ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¶ÇÇÑ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ°¡ ÃæºÐÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ ¾ò°í ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤À» ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áß¿äÇÑ Áú¹®¿¡ ´ë´äÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

1. ÇöÀç ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð¿Í ÇâÈÄ ¼ºÀå ¿¹ÃøÀº?

2. ÃÖ°íÀÇ ÅõÀÚ ±âȸ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â Á¦Ç°, ºÎ¹® ¹× Áö¿ªÀº ¾îµðÀԴϱî?

3. ½ÃÀåÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ±â¼ú µ¿Çâ°ú ±ÔÁ¦ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀº?

4. ÁÖ¿ä º¥´õÀÇ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²°ú °æÀï Æ÷Áö¼ÇÀº?

5. º¥´õ ½ÃÀå ÁøÀÔ¡¤Ã¶¼ö Àü·«ÀÇ ¿øµ¿·ÂÀÌ µÇ´Â ¼öÀÍ¿ø°ú Àü·«Àû ±âȸ´Â ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ
    • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
      • »çÀ̹ö °ø°ÝÀÇ ±ÞÁõ°ú ³×Æ®¿öÅ© º¸¾È Ãë¾à¼ºÀÇ º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÑ Æ¯Á¤ Çʿ伺
      • Àü¼úÀû À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ÅøÀÇ °³¹ßÀ» ÃËÁøÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Á¤ºÎÀÇ °è¹ß Ä·ÆäÀÎ
      • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í ¿ø°Ý ±Ù¹«ÀÚ¿¡¼­ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ »ç¿ëÀÌ ±ÞÁõ
    • ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
      • À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ±¸Çö °áÇÔ ¹× ¾ÆÅ°ÅØó ¹ö±×¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿ì·Á
    • ±âȸ
      • À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µÀÇ ±â¼úÀû Áøº¸´Â ÁÖ·Î AI/ML ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú ÀÚµ¿È­¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
      • ¸ÂÃãÇü »ç¿ëÀÚ Á᫐ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÐ ½º¸¶Æ® ½ÃƼ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î ÅõÀÚ
    • °úÁ¦
      • À§ÇùÀÇ Æø¹ßÀûÀÎ Áõ°¡ À§Çè°ú À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø¸¦ ½ÇÇàÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¼÷·ÃµÈ »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È Àü¹®°¡ÀÇ ºÎÁ·
  • ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®
  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®
    • Á¤Ä¡Àû
    • °æÁ¦
    • »ç±³
    • ±â¼úÀû
    • ¹ý·ü»ó
    • ȯ°æ

Á¦6Àå À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå : À¯Çüº°

  • ¼­ºñ½º
  • ¼Ö·ç¼Ç

Á¦7Àå À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå : Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

  • °ø°Ý Æ®¸®
  • °øÅë Ãë¾à¼º Æò°¡ ½Ã½ºÅÛ(CVSS)
  • DREAD
  • ¿î¿µ»ó Áß¿äÇÑ À§Çù, ÀÚ»ê, Ãë¾à¼º Æò°¡(OCTAVE)
  • °ø°Ý ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ¹× À§Çù ºÐ¼® ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º(PASTA)
  • Á¤·®Àû À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ¹ý
  • STRIDE
  • T¸Ê
  • Æ®¶óÀÌÅ©
  • ½Ã°¢Àû, ¾ÖÀÚÀÏ, ½ÉÇÃÇÑ À§Çù(VAST)

Á¦8Àå À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå : Àü°³º°

  • Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå
  • ¿ÂÇÁ·¹¹Ì½º

Á¦9Àå À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå : Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°

  • ´ë±â¾÷
  • Áß¼Ò±â¾÷

Á¦10Àå À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • ÀºÇà, ±ÝÀ¶, º¸Çè
  • ¿¡³ÊÁö
  • ÇコÄɾî
  • IT ¹× Åë½Å

Á¦11Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå

  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîƼ³ª
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ¹Ì±¹

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå

  • È£ÁÖ
  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀϺ»
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • Çѱ¹
  • ´ë¸¸
  • ű¹
  • º£Æ®³²

Á¦13Àå À¯·´¡¤Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä« À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ Åø ½ÃÀå

  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Çɶõµå
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ½ºÀ§½º
  • ÅÍÅ°
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • ¿µ±¹

Á¦14Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼® 2023
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2023
  • °æÀï ½Ã³ª¸®¿À ºÐ¼®
    • MedCrypt°¡ ÅÍÇÁÃ÷ ´ëÇÐ °øÇкÎÀÇ ÀÇ·á±â±â º¸¾È Á¶»ç¿¡ ÀÚ±Ý Á¦°ø
    • Accenture¿Í Google Cloud°¡ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» È®´ëÇÏ¿© »çÀ̹ö º¸¾ÈÀÇ Åº·ÂÀ» °¡¼Ó
    • Picnic CorporationÀÌ ½Ã¸®Áî AÀÇ ¿¬Àå ÀÚ±ÝÀ» Á¶´Þ
    • PayPal Ventures, À§Çù ¹æÁö ±â¾÷ Deep Instinct¸¦ Áö¿ø
    • Accenture, ºê¶óÁú »çÀ̹ö º¸¾È ±â¾÷ Morphus Àμö
    • A10 NetworksÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ¼­ºñ½º°¡ È®´ëµÇ´Â »çÀ̹ö »óȲ¿¡ ´ëÀÀ
    • ThreatModeler°¡ ThreatModeler Ä¿¹Â´ÏƼ¸¦ ½ÃÀÛ
    • Security Compass, »õ·Î¿î º¸¾È ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î °³¹ß °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ´Â SD ElementsÀÇ »õ·Î¿î °³¹ßÀÚ Á᫐ À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µ ±â´É Ãâ½Ã
    • IriusRisk, ¾Û À§Çù ¸ðµ¨¸µÀ» ÀÚµ¿È­Çϱâ À§ÇØ 2,900¸¸ ´Þ·¯¸¦ Á¶´Þ
    • Google, MandiantÀÇ Àμö¸¦ ¿Ï·á
  • Àü·« ºÐ¼®°ú Á¦¾È

±â¾÷ ¸ñ·Ï

  • Avocado Systems, Inc.
  • Cairis
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Coalfire Systems, Inc.
  • Cobalt.io
  • cybeta
  • Cymune
  • FireMon, LLC
  • GitLab BV
  • HackerOne Inc.
  • Intel Corporation
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • IRIUSRISK, SL
  • Kenna Security
  • Mandiant by Google, LLC
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Nopsec, Inc.
  • Nuspire, LLC
  • OWASP Foundation, Inc.
  • Qseap Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
  • Rapid7, Inc.
  • Secura by Bureau Veritas
  • Security Compass Technologies Ltd.
  • Securonix, Inc.
  • Snyk Limited
  • Sparx Systems Pty Ltd.
  • Synopsys, Inc.
  • Threagile
  • ThreatModeler Software, Inc.
  • Toreon BV
  • Tutamantic
  • Varonis Systems, Inc.
  • Vectra AI, Inc.
  • VerSprite
  • Visual Paradigm Online service
  • White Hat Security, Inc.
  • ZeroNorth
JHS 24.12.04

The Threat Modeling Tools Market was valued at USD 940.06 million in 2023, expected to reach USD 1,064.25 million in 2024, and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 13.60%, to USD 2,295.29 million by 2030.

Threat modeling tools are essential components in cybersecurity frameworks, designed to identify, predict, and mitigate potential security threats within systems and applications. These tools are necessary for organizations aiming to preemptively address vulnerabilities, ensuring robust defense mechanisms are established to protect sensitive data from malicious activities. Their application spans various industries, including finance, healthcare, and government sectors, where data integrity and confidentiality are paramount. The end-use scope of threat modeling tools can extend to IT security teams, risk management departments, and compliance officers, emphasizing its interdepartmental reach in enhancing an organization's security posture.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2023] USD 940.06 million
Estimated Year [2024] USD 1,064.25 million
Forecast Year [2030] USD 2,295.29 million
CAGR (%) 13.60%

The market for threat modeling tools is primarily driven by the increasing frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks, regulatory compliances like GDPR and HIPAA necessitating stringent data protection measures, and the growing adoption of digital transformation across industries. However, one of the major limitations hindering growth is the complexity and high cost associated with implementing comprehensive threat modeling solutions. Additionally, a shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals to effectively use these tools poses another significant challenge.

Despite these limitations, there are emerging opportunities within the market. The rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning presents avenues for innovation, enabling the development of more intuitive and predictive threat modeling tools. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of cloud services and the Internet of Things (IoT) devices creates a demand for tailored security solutions, thereby expanding the scope for customization and integration of threat modeling tools.

For enterprises seeking growth, investing in research to enhance user-friendliness and scalability of threat modeling solutions can be a critical differentiator. Additionally, partnerships with educational institutions to bolster the cybersecurity workforce and expanding educational programs can mitigate human resource challenges. Overall, the market's dynamic nature calls for agile innovation strategies and a focus on comprehensive, user-centric solutions that address both existing security challenges and anticipate future threats.

Market Dynamics: Unveiling Key Market Insights in the Rapidly Evolving Threat Modeling Tools Market

The Threat Modeling Tools Market is undergoing transformative changes driven by a dynamic interplay of supply and demand factors. Understanding these evolving market dynamics prepares business organizations to make informed investment decisions, refine strategic decisions, and seize new opportunities. By gaining a comprehensive view of these trends, business organizations can mitigate various risks across political, geographic, technical, social, and economic domains while also gaining a clearer understanding of consumer behavior and its impact on manufacturing costs and purchasing trends.

  • Market Drivers
    • Exponential rise in cyber attacks and need for better identification of network security vulnerabilities
    • Government awareness campaigns to encourage the development of tactical threat modeling tools
    • Surging use of threat modeling in cloud infrastructures and for remote workers
  • Market Restraints
    • Concerns related to implementation flaws and architectural bugs in threat modeling
  • Market Opportunities
    • Technological advancements in threat modeling primarily focused on AI/ML systems and automation
    • Emerging investments in smart city infrastructure with a focus on modeling customized user-centric threats
  • Market Challenges
    • Risk of threat explosion and limited availability of skilled cybersecurity professionals to run threat modeling tools

Porter's Five Forces: A Strategic Tool for Navigating the Threat Modeling Tools Market

Porter's five forces framework is a critical tool for understanding the competitive landscape of the Threat Modeling Tools Market. It offers business organizations with a clear methodology for evaluating their competitive positioning and exploring strategic opportunities. This framework helps businesses assess the power dynamics within the market and determine the profitability of new ventures. With these insights, business organizations can leverage their strengths, address weaknesses, and avoid potential challenges, ensuring a more resilient market positioning.

PESTLE Analysis: Navigating External Influences in the Threat Modeling Tools Market

External macro-environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping the performance dynamics of the Threat Modeling Tools Market. Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors analysis provides the necessary information to navigate these influences. By examining PESTLE factors, businesses can better understand potential risks and opportunities. This analysis enables business organizations to anticipate changes in regulations, consumer preferences, and economic trends, ensuring they are prepared to make proactive, forward-thinking decisions.

Market Share Analysis: Understanding the Competitive Landscape in the Threat Modeling Tools Market

A detailed market share analysis in the Threat Modeling Tools Market provides a comprehensive assessment of vendors' performance. Companies can identify their competitive positioning by comparing key metrics, including revenue, customer base, and growth rates. This analysis highlights market concentration, fragmentation, and trends in consolidation, offering vendors the insights required to make strategic decisions that enhance their position in an increasingly competitive landscape.

FPNV Positioning Matrix: Evaluating Vendors' Performance in the Threat Modeling Tools Market

The Forefront, Pathfinder, Niche, Vital (FPNV) Positioning Matrix is a critical tool for evaluating vendors within the Threat Modeling Tools Market. This matrix enables business organizations to make well-informed decisions that align with their goals by assessing vendors based on their business strategy and product satisfaction. The four quadrants provide a clear and precise segmentation of vendors, helping users identify the right partners and solutions that best fit their strategic objectives.

Strategy Analysis & Recommendation: Charting a Path to Success in the Threat Modeling Tools Market

A strategic analysis of the Threat Modeling Tools Market is essential for businesses looking to strengthen their global market presence. By reviewing key resources, capabilities, and performance indicators, business organizations can identify growth opportunities and work toward improvement. This approach helps businesses navigate challenges in the competitive landscape and ensures they are well-positioned to capitalize on newer opportunities and drive long-term success.

Key Company Profiles

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Threat Modeling Tools Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Avocado Systems, Inc., Cairis, Cisco Systems, Inc., Coalfire Systems, Inc., Cobalt.io, cybeta, Cymune, FireMon, LLC, GitLab B.V., HackerOne Inc., Intel Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation, IRIUSRISK, S.L., Kenna Security, Mandiant by Google, LLC, Microsoft Corporation, Nopsec, Inc., Nuspire, LLC, OWASP Foundation, Inc., Qseap Infotech Pvt. Ltd., Rapid7, Inc., Secura by Bureau Veritas, Security Compass Technologies Ltd., Securonix, Inc., Snyk Limited, Sparx Systems Pty Ltd., Synopsys, Inc., Threagile, ThreatModeler Software, Inc., Toreon BV, Tutamantic, Varonis Systems, Inc., Vectra AI, Inc., VerSprite, Visual Paradigm Online service, White Hat Security, Inc., and ZeroNorth.

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes the Threat Modeling Tools Market to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-markets:

  • Based on Type, market is studied across Services and Solutions.
  • Based on Methodology, market is studied across Attack Tree, Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), DREAD, Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE), Process for Attack Simulation & Threat Analysis (PASTA), Quantitative Threat Modeling Method, STRIDE, T-MAP, Trike, and Visual, Agile, & Simple Threat (VAST).
  • Based on Deployment, market is studied across Cloud and On-Premise.
  • Based on Organization-Size, market is studied across Large Enterprises and Small & Medium Enterprises.
  • Based on End-User, market is studied across Banking, Finance & Insurance, Energy, Healthcare, and IT & Telecommunications.
  • Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

The report offers a comprehensive analysis of the market, covering key focus areas:

1. Market Penetration: A detailed review of the current market environment, including extensive data from top industry players, evaluating their market reach and overall influence.

2. Market Development: Identifies growth opportunities in emerging markets and assesses expansion potential in established sectors, providing a strategic roadmap for future growth.

3. Market Diversification: Analyzes recent product launches, untapped geographic regions, major industry advancements, and strategic investments reshaping the market.

4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides a thorough analysis of the competitive landscape, examining market share, business strategies, product portfolios, certifications, regulatory approvals, patent trends, and technological advancements of key players.

5. Product Development & Innovation: Highlights cutting-edge technologies, R&D activities, and product innovations expected to drive future market growth.

The report also answers critical questions to aid stakeholders in making informed decisions:

1. What is the current market size, and what is the forecasted growth?

2. Which products, segments, and regions offer the best investment opportunities?

3. What are the key technology trends and regulatory influences shaping the market?

4. How do leading vendors rank in terms of market share and competitive positioning?

5. What revenue sources and strategic opportunities drive vendors' market entry or exit strategies?

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Exponential rise in cyber attacks and need for better identification of network security vulnerabilities
      • 5.1.1.2. Government awareness campaigns to encourage the development of tactical threat modeling tools
      • 5.1.1.3. Surging use of threat modeling in cloud infrastructures and for remote workers
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. Concerns related to implementation flaws and architectural bugs in threat modeling
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Technological advancements in threat modeling primarily focused on AI/ML systems and automation
      • 5.1.3.2. Emerging investments in smart city infrastructure with a focus on modeling customized user-centric threats
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Risk of threat explosion and limited availability of skilled cybersecurity professionals to run threat modeling tools
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Threat Modeling Tools Market, by Type

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Services
  • 6.3. Solutions

7. Threat Modeling Tools Market, by Methodology

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Attack Tree
  • 7.3. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)
  • 7.4. DREAD
  • 7.5. Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE)
  • 7.6. Process for Attack Simulation & Threat Analysis (PASTA)
  • 7.7. Quantitative Threat Modeling Method
  • 7.8. STRIDE
  • 7.9. T-MAP
  • 7.10. Trike
  • 7.11. Visual, Agile, & Simple Threat (VAST)

8. Threat Modeling Tools Market, by Deployment

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Cloud
  • 8.3. On-Premise

9. Threat Modeling Tools Market, by Organization-Size

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Large Enterprises
  • 9.3. Small & Medium Enterprises

10. Threat Modeling Tools Market, by End-User

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Banking, Finance & Insurance
  • 10.3. Energy
  • 10.4. Healthcare
  • 10.5. IT & Telecommunications

11. Americas Threat Modeling Tools Market

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Argentina
  • 11.3. Brazil
  • 11.4. Canada
  • 11.5. Mexico
  • 11.6. United States

12. Asia-Pacific Threat Modeling Tools Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Australia
  • 12.3. China
  • 12.4. India
  • 12.5. Indonesia
  • 12.6. Japan
  • 12.7. Malaysia
  • 12.8. Philippines
  • 12.9. Singapore
  • 12.10. South Korea
  • 12.11. Taiwan
  • 12.12. Thailand
  • 12.13. Vietnam

13. Europe, Middle East & Africa Threat Modeling Tools Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Denmark
  • 13.3. Egypt
  • 13.4. Finland
  • 13.5. France
  • 13.6. Germany
  • 13.7. Israel
  • 13.8. Italy
  • 13.9. Netherlands
  • 13.10. Nigeria
  • 13.11. Norway
  • 13.12. Poland
  • 13.13. Qatar
  • 13.14. Russia
  • 13.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 13.16. South Africa
  • 13.17. Spain
  • 13.18. Sweden
  • 13.19. Switzerland
  • 13.20. Turkey
  • 13.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 13.22. United Kingdom

14. Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2023
  • 14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2023
  • 14.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 14.3.1. MedCrypt Funds Medical Device Usable Security Research at the School of Engineering at Tufts University
    • 14.3.2. Accenture and Google Cloud Expand Partnership to Accelerate Cybersecurity Resilience
    • 14.3.3. Picnic Corporation raises Series A extension funding
    • 14.3.4. PayPal Ventures backs threat prevention firm Deep Instinct
    • 14.3.5. Accenture Acquires Morphus, Brazil-Based Cybersecurity Company
    • 14.3.6. A10 Networks' New Service Addresses Expanding Cyber Threat Landscape
    • 14.3.7. ThreatModeler Launches ThreatModeler Community
    • 14.3.8. Security Compass Releases New Developer-Centric Threat Modeling Capabilities in SD Elements in Support of New Secure Software Development Guidelines
    • 14.3.9. IriusRisk lands USD 29 million to automate threat modeling for apps
    • 14.3.10. Google completes acquisition of Mandiant
  • 14.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. Avocado Systems, Inc.
  • 2. Cairis
  • 3. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 4. Coalfire Systems, Inc.
  • 5. Cobalt.io
  • 6. cybeta
  • 7. Cymune
  • 8. FireMon, LLC
  • 9. GitLab B.V.
  • 10. HackerOne Inc.
  • 11. Intel Corporation
  • 12. International Business Machines Corporation
  • 13. IRIUSRISK, S.L.
  • 14. Kenna Security
  • 15. Mandiant by Google, LLC
  • 16. Microsoft Corporation
  • 17. Nopsec, Inc.
  • 18. Nuspire, LLC
  • 19. OWASP Foundation, Inc.
  • 20. Qseap Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
  • 21. Rapid7, Inc.
  • 22. Secura by Bureau Veritas
  • 23. Security Compass Technologies Ltd.
  • 24. Securonix, Inc.
  • 25. Snyk Limited
  • 26. Sparx Systems Pty Ltd.
  • 27. Synopsys, Inc.
  • 28. Threagile
  • 29. ThreatModeler Software, Inc.
  • 30. Toreon BV
  • 31. Tutamantic
  • 32. Varonis Systems, Inc.
  • 33. Vectra AI, Inc.
  • 34. VerSprite
  • 35. Visual Paradigm Online service
  • 36. White Hat Security, Inc.
  • 37. ZeroNorth
ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óÇ°À» ¼±Åà Áß
»óÇ° ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦