½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1804467

½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå : Á¦Ç° À¯Çü, ÀÛ¹° À¯Çü, Àû¿ë ¹æ¹ý, Æ÷Àå À¯Çü, À¯Åë ä³Îº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market by Product Type, Crop Type, Application Method, Packaging Type, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 190 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡´Â 38¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â 41¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯, CAGR 7.17%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 58¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ 2024³â 38¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ 2025³â 41¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ 2030³â 58¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 7.17%

´Ù¾çÇÑ ³ó¾÷ ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼­ Àç»ý ³ó¾÷°ú Åä¾ç °Ç°­ °ü¸®¸¦ °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·áÀÇ ÀáÀç·Â ¹ßÈÖÇÒ °Í

Áö¼Ó°¡´ÉÇÑ ³ó¾÷°ú Åä¾ç °Ç°­¼º °­È­¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Çʿ伺ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ³ó¾÷ÇÐÀÚ, »ý»êÀÚ, Á¤Ã¥ ÀÔ¾ÈÀÚµé »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ ½Ä¹° À¯·¡ À¯±âÁú ºñ·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù ¸î ³â µ¿¾È ÀÛ¹° ÀÜ·ù¹°, ³ìºñ ¹× ±âŸ Àç»ý °¡´ÉÇÑ ½Ä¹° À¯·¡ ¿µ¾ç ¼Ö·ç¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ±ÞÁõÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ´Â »ýÅÂÀû ûÁö±â Á¤½Å°ú ¼øÈ¯ °æÁ¦ ¿øÄ¢À¸·ÎÀÇ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÀüȯÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹è°æ¿¡¼­ »ý»êÀÚµéÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¿µ¾ç ü°è¸¦ ÀçÆò°¡Çϰí, ¹Ì»ý¹°ÀÇ È°¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̰í, Åä¾ç ±¸Á¶¸¦ °³¼±Çϰí, ȯ°æÀû ¿ÜºÎ¼ºÀ» °¨¼Ò½ÃŰ´Â Á¦Ç°À» ã°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Áß¿äÇÑ Çõ½ÅÀ» ޱ¸ÇÏ´Â ±â¼ú Çõ½Å ±ÔÁ¦ ÀçÆí ¹× À¯Åë Çõ½Å ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á »ê¾÷À» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â °Íµé

Çõ½Å ÁÖ±â¿Í ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀÌ ¼ö·ÅÇϸ鼭 ½Ä¹° À¯·¡ À¯±âÁú ºñ·áÀÇ °³¹ß, À¯Åë ¹× Ã¤Åà ¹æ½Ä¿¡ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ º¯È­°¡ ÀϾ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. »ý¸í°øÇÐÀÇ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ½Ä¹° À¯·¡ ¿µ¾ç¿ø°ú ½Ã³ÊÁö È¿°ú¸¦ ¹ßÈÖÇÏ´Â ¹Ì»ý¹° ÄÁ¼Ò½Ã¾ö°ú È¿¼Ò ±â¹Ý ÷°¡Á¦ÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇØÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡, Á¤¹Ð³ó¾÷ µµ±¸(¿ø°Ý °¨ÁöºÎÅÍ °¡º¯ ¼Óµµ ¾îÇø®ÄÉÀÌÅͱîÁö)´Â ¿µ¾çºÐ ¹èÄ¡¸¦ ÃÖÀûÈ­Çϰí, ³¶ºñ¸¦ ÁÙÀ̰í, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹ç Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ ÀÛ¹°ÀÇ ¼º´ÉÀ» ±Ø´ëÈ­ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ 2025³â °ü¼¼ Á¶Á¤ÀÌ °ø±Þ¸Á ȸº¹·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇ⠽Ű¼º À¯±â ºñ·á °Å·¡ÀÇ ºñ¿ë ¿ªÇÐ ¹× ½ÃÀå Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ºÐ¼®

¹Ì±¹Àº 2025³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±âÁú ºñ·áÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¼ººÐÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ÀϺΠ³ó¾÷ ÅõÀÔ¹°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü¼¼ ÀÏÁ¤À» °³Á¤Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¶Ä¡´Â ±¹³» Á¦Á¶¾÷À» º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇÑ °ÍÀÌÁö¸¸, ±¹Á¦ °ø±Þ¸Á¿¡ ¿¬¼âÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼öÀÔ ¿øÀÚÀç¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ´Â »ý»êÀÚµéÀº ÅõÀÔ¹° ºñ¿ë »ó½Â¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÏ¿© Á¶´Þ Àü·«°ú ºñ¿ë °ü¸® ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å¼ÓÇÑ ÀçÆò°¡¸¦ Ã˱¸Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ Á¦Ç° äÅà ä³ÎÀÇ ¿ªµ¿¼º°ú »ç¿ë ¼±È£µµ¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ÆÐÅÏÀÇ ÇØµ¶

´Ù¾çÇÑ ³óÇÐÀû Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¦Ç°ÀÌ ¾î¶»°Ô ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®´Â ¸ñÇ¥ ¼ºÀå ±âȸ¸¦ Ãß±¸ÇÏ´Â ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀڵ鿡°Ô ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÔ»ó, ¾×ü ¹× ºÐ¸» Á¦Ç°Àº °¢°¢ °íÀ¯ÇÑ Ãë±Þ Ư¼º, ¹èÇÕ À¯¿¬¼º ¹× ¼öÀ² ¹ÝÀÀ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏÀ» ³ªÅ¸³À´Ï´Ù. °ú¸³Á¦´Â ¿µ¾çºÐ ¹æÃâÀÌ ±æ°í, Á¾Á¾ ¹«°æ¿î Àç¹è¿¡¼­ ¼±È£µÇ´Â ¹Ý¸é, ¾×Á¦´Â °íºÎ°¡°¡Ä¡ ¿ø¿¹¿¡¼­ ÈçÈ÷ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ½Ä¹°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºü¸¥ Èí¼ö ½Ã³ª¸®¿À°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¹Ý¸é, ³óÃàºÐ¸»Àº ¿î¼Û°ú º¸°ü¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¹°·ù»óÀÇ ÀÌÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ¾î À¯Åë¾÷ü¿Í Çùµ¿Á¶ÇÕ¿¡°Ô ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·áÀÇ Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê°ú Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º ÃßÁøµ¿·Â

¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«´Â ºÏ¹ÌÀÇ Ã·´Ü Á¤¹Ð³ó¾÷ ȸ¶û¿¡¼­ ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ½ÅÈï ³ó¾÷ ºñÁî´Ï½º ÅëÇÕ¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ½ÃÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀÇ ÅÂÇǽºÆ®¸®¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹°ú ij³ª´Ù¿¡¼­´Â ±ÔÁ¦ Àμ¾Æ¼ºê, ź¼Ò¹èÃâ±Ç ÅëÇÕ, źźÇÑ À¯Åë ÀÎÇÁ¶ó°¡ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â³ó ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ²ÙÁØÇÑ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» µÞ¹ÞħÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹Ý´ë·Î ºê¶óÁú°ú ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª¿¡¼­´Â »ó¾÷Àû ¿¬ÀÛ ÀÛ¹°ÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ È®´ë·Î ÀÎÇØ °í¼öÀÍ ¸ñÇ¥¸¦ Áö¿øÇÏ´Â ºñ¿ë È¿À²ÀûÀÎ °ú¸³ ¹× ºÐ¸» ºñ·á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á Á¦Á¶ ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ½ÃÀå ¸®´õ½ÊÀ» °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ ±â¼ú ÅõÀÚ¿Í ESG¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Çå½ÅÀ¸·Î Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ¸¦ ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ±â¾÷ °­Á¶

½Ä¹° À¯·¡ À¯±âÁú ºñ·á ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷µéÀº Àü·«Àû ÅõÀÚ, ¾÷°è °£ Á¦ÈÞ, µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ ¹èÇÕ±â¼úÀÇ À¶ÇÕÀ» ÅëÇØ Â÷º°È­¸¦ ²ÒÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿¬±¸ ÁÖµµÇü ±â¾÷Àº ³ó¾÷ ´ëÇÐ ¹× »ý¸í°øÇÐ ½ºÅ¸Æ®¾÷°ú Çù·Â °ü°è¸¦ ¸Î°í ¹Ì»ý¹° ÄÁ¼Ò½Ã¾öÀ» °³¼±ÇÏ°í ¿µ¾çºÐ ¹æÃâ µ¿¿ªÇÐÀ» °­È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀº Çõ½ÅÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­ÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, °æÀï ½ÃÀå °æÀï¿¡¼­ ¹æ¾î °¡´ÉÇÑ ÁöÀû Àç»êÀ» âÃâÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àü·«Àû ·Îµå¸ÊÀÇ °á°ú¹° ¹× ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ °æÀï·ÂÀ» °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ º£½ºÆ® ÇÁ·¢Æ¼½º¸¦ Á¦¾ÈÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº »õ·Î¿î ³óÇÐ °úÁ¦¸¦ ¼±Á¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ Ã·´Ü »ý¸í°øÇÐ ±â¼úÀ» Á¦Ç° ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀο¡ ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§·Î »ï¾Æ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °³º° ¿ä±¸¿¡ ¸Â´Â ¹Ì»ý¹° ±ÕÁÖ ¹× È¿¼Ò ¿î¹Ýü¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº ƯÁ¤ ÀÛ¹° ¹× Åä¾çÀÇ °Ç°­ ¿ä°ÇÀ» ÃæÁ·ÇÏ´Â Â÷º°È­µÈ ¿µ¾ç ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ±â¹Ý ³óÇÐ µµ±¸¸¦ ¼­ºñ½º °è¾à¿¡ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© °í°´ À¯Áö¸¦ °­È­ÇÏ°í ±¸µ¶ ±â¹Ý ¼öÀÍ ¸ðµ¨À» ÃËÁøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå ÀÎÅÚ¸®Àü½º¸¦ Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ 1Â÷ ÀÎÅͺä¿Í 2Â÷ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ »ï°¢Ãø·® ¹× Àü¹®°¡ °ËÁõÀ» äÅÃÇÑ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©

º» ºÐ¼®Àº Á¤¼ºÀû ÀλçÀÌÆ®¿Í Á¤·®Àû °ËÁõÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¹üÀ§¸¦ º¸ÀåÇÏ´Â ÇÏÀ̺긮µå Á¶»ç ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿¡¼­´Â ÁÖ¿ä Áö¿ªÀÇ ºñ·á °¡°ø¾÷ü, ³óÇÐÀÚ, À¯Åë¾÷ü, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ »ý»êÀÚ¿ÍÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÁøÇàÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´ëÈ­¸¦ ÅëÇØ Á¦Ç° ¼º´É, ä³Î ¿ªÇÐ, »õ·Î¿î äÅà À庮¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ °üÁ¡À» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä Àü·«Àû ÀÓÆÑÆ®ÀÇ ÅëÇÕ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ºÎ¹®ÀÇ Åº·ÂÀû ¼ºÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ ÇâÈÄ Àü¸Á°ú ÇÙ½É ¼º°ø¿äÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÚ·áÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Ä¹° À¯·¡ À¯±â ºñ·áÀÇ ±ËÀûÀº ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ±ÔÁ¦ ÁøÈ­, ¼ÒºñÀÚ ±â´ëÄ¡ º¯È­ÀÇ ÇÕ·ù¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Çü¼ºµË´Ï´Ù. ½Ä¹° À¯·¡ ¿µ¾ç ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ³ó¾÷Àû ÀáÀç·ÂÀÌ Á¡Á¡ ´õ ºÐ¸íÇØÁü¿¡ µû¶ó, ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼ºÀÇ ¿ä±¸¿Í ȸº¹·ÂÀÇ ¿ä±¸·Î Á¤ÀǵǴ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Ä¡¸¦ ¾ò±â À§ÇØ Àü·«À» À籸¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå : Á¦Ç° À¯Çüº°

  • ÀÔ»ó
  • ¾×ü
  • ºÐ¸»

Á¦9Àå ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå : ÀÛ¹° À¯Çüº°

  • °î¹°
  • °úÀϰú ä¼Ò
  • Áö¹æÁ¾ÀÚ¿Í µÎ·ù

Á¦10Àå ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå : Àû¿ë ¹æ¹ýº°

  • ¿±¸é »ìÆ÷
  • Åä¾ç¿¡ÀÇ ½Ã¿ë

Á¦11Àå ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå : Æ÷Àå À¯Çüº°

  • ¹é
  • µå·³

Á¦12Àå ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå : À¯Åë ä³Îº°

  • ¿ÀÇÁ¶óÀÎ
    • ¼Ò¸Å¾÷ü
    • µµ¸Å¾÷ü
  • ¿Â¶óÀÎ
    • E-Commerce Ç÷§Æû
    • Á¦Á¶¾÷ü À¥»çÀÌÆ®

Á¦13Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦14Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦15Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ½Ä¹°¼º À¯±â ºñ·á ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦16Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Nutrien Ltd.
    • Benefert B.V.
    • California Organic Fertilizers Inc.
    • Coromandel International Limited
    • Haifa Group Ltd.
    • ICL Group Ltd
    • Indogulf BioAg LLC
    • Italpollina S.p.A.
    • Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co., Ltd.
    • Krishak Bharati Cooperative Limited
    • Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
    • Midwestern BioAg
    • Nature Care Fertilizers
    • Sustane Natural Fertilizer, Inc.
    • Tata Chemicals Ltd.
    • The Andersons, Inc.
    • The Mosaic Company
    • The Scotts Company LLC
    • The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
    • Valagro Group S.p.A.
    • Wesfarmers Limited
    • Yara International ASA

Á¦17Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦18Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦21Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSM 25.09.10

The Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market was valued at USD 3.87 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.13 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.17%, reaching USD 5.87 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 3.87 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 4.13 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 5.87 billion
CAGR (%) 7.17%

Unlocking the Potential of Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers for Regenerative Agriculture and Enhanced Soil Health Management Across Diverse Farming Systems

The growing imperative for sustainable agriculture and soil health enhancement has brought plant-based organic fertilizers into sharp focus among agronomists, growers, and policymakers alike. In recent years, demand has surged for nutrition solutions derived from crop residues, green manures, and other renewable plant sources, reflecting a broader shift toward ecological stewardship and circular economy principles. Against this backdrop, growers are re-evaluating traditional nutrient regimes, seeking products that enrich microbial activity, improve soil structure, and reduce environmental externalities.

Driven by rising awareness of the environmental impacts of synthetic inputs, regulatory frameworks have begun to favor organically derived alternatives. As a result, manufacturers are accelerating innovation pipelines to optimize nutrient availability and consistency in plant-based formulations. Concurrently, agronomic research has illuminated specific crop and soil profiles where these fertilizers deliver compelling agronomic benefits, including enhanced nutrient use efficiency and resilience to abiotic stressors.

Moreover, consumers and retailers are placing a premium on traceability and environmental credentials, prompting supply chain actors to integrate life-cycle assessments and certification standards into product development. This trend has fostered closer collaboration between fertilizer producers, technology providers, and farming enterprises to co-create holistic solutions that align with regenerative agriculture paradigms.

As this report opens, it provides a comprehensive foundation for understanding the market's current dynamics and sets the stage for exploring transformative shifts, policy impacts, segmentation nuances, and strategic opportunities in the following sections.

Exploring the Pivotal Innovations Technology Breakthroughs Regulatory Realignments and Distribution Transformations Reshaping the Plant-Based Organic Fertilizer Industry

Innovation cycles and market dynamics have converged to create pivotal shifts in how plant-based organic fertilizers are developed, distributed, and adopted. Advances in biotechnology have enabled the refinement of microbial consortia and enzyme-based additives that synergize with plant-derived nutrient sources. At the same time, precision agriculture tools-ranging from remote sensing to variable-rate applicators-are optimizing nutrient placement, reducing waste, and maximizing crop performance under diverse field conditions.

Regulatory landscapes have also evolved, with governments redefining inputs under organic certification schemes and incentivizing low-carbon agricultural practices. These policy realignments have catalyzed partnerships between fertilizer suppliers and research institutions, accelerating the commercialization of novel formulations. Furthermore, digital platforms are reshaping distribution channels by connecting growers to direct-to-farm supply models, thereby shortening lead times and improving traceability.

Meanwhile, shifts in supply chain resilience priorities have surfaced amid global trade disruptions and input price volatility. Stakeholders are embracing nearshoring strategies and regional manufacturing hubs to mitigate risk and ensure consistent access to plant-based raw materials. In parallel, sustainability reporting requirements are driving end-to-end visibility, fostering transparency in resource sourcing and environmental impacts.

Taken together, these converging forces are reconfiguring competitive landscapes and creating new avenues for differentiation. In the next section, we analyze how United States tariff policy adjustments in 2025 will further influence trade flows, cost structures, and strategic positioning.

Analyzing the Far-Reaching Consequences of United States 2025 Tariff Adjustments on Supply Chain Resilience Cost Dynamics and Market Positioning in Plant-Based Organic Fertilizer Trade

Effective January 2025, the United States implemented revised tariff schedules on select agricultural inputs, including key constituents of plant-based organic fertilizers. While these measures aim to protect domestic manufacturing, they have generated cascading effects along international supply chains. Producers dependent on imported raw materials have faced elevated input costs, prompting rapid reevaluation of sourcing strategies and cost-management frameworks.

In response, several manufacturers have pursued vertical integration, securing contracts with domestic biomass producers and investing in local processing infrastructure. This transition has not only offset tariff impacts but also enhanced supply security and reduced lead times. However, smaller players lacking scale have encountered greater constraints, as increased logistics expenses and compliance burdens have squeezed operational margins.

End users, particularly large-scale mixed-cropping operations, have felt the reverberations through higher delivered costs, which in some cases have prompted temporary shifts back to conventional synthetic alternatives. Nevertheless, the tariff environment has underscored the importance of product differentiation based on demonstrable agronomic value and premium positioning. Companies able to validate yield improvements, soil health benefits, and lower carbon footprints have managed to preserve price elasticity among discerning buyers.

As we pivot to segmentation analysis, it is essential to contextualize these policy-driven disruptions within broader product, crop, application, packaging, and distribution dimensions. Such granularity is critical for anticipating how tariff-induced cost pressures will influence demand patterns and competitive strategies through the remainder of the cycle.

Decoding Critical Segmentation Patterns Shaping Product Adoption Channel Dynamics and Application Preferences in the Plant-Based Organic Fertilizer Arena

Insight into how different products perform under varied agronomic conditions is critical for stakeholders seeking targeted growth opportunities. The granular, liquid, and powder offerings each exhibit unique handling characteristics, formulation flexibilities, and yield response profiles. Granular variants often deliver prolonged nutrient release, making them preferred in no-till operations, whereas liquid formulations excel in rapid plant uptake scenarios commonly found in high-value horticulture. Powder concentrates, meanwhile, offer logistical advantages in transport and storage that appeal to distributors and cooperatives.

Examining crop-specific uptake reveals that cereals and grains command consistent volume demand, driven by global staple markets, while fruits and vegetables demonstrate higher willingness to adopt premium organic blends that enhance quality and shelf-life. Oilseeds and pulses occupy a strategic niche, bridging commodity scale with soil-enriching rotation benefits that amplify regenerative narratives.

Application method segmentation shows distinct adoption curves: foliar application has gained traction among growers seeking immediate correction of nutrient deficiencies, whereas soil application retains strong relevance in baseline nutritional programs and long-term soil fertility management. Packaging preferences likewise diverge: bags are favored in smallholder and cooperative models, while drums accommodate high-volume purchasers such as large-scale agribusinesses and custom-blend facilities.

Distribution channels have fragmented into offline networks encompassing traditional retailers and wholesalers, complemented by online touchpoints through e-commerce platforms and manufacturer websites. Offline partners provide seasoned agronomic guidance and rapid order fulfillment, while digital channels enable direct farm deliveries, subscription models, and data-driven customer engagement.

This multi-dimensional segmentation framework equips decision-makers to tailor product strategies, optimize channel investments, and align R&D pipelines with evolving end-user requirements.

Assessing Regional Growth Variations Strategic Partnerships and Sustainability Drivers for Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers across the Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia-Pacific

The Americas region presents a tapestry of market drivers that span from advanced precision farming corridors in North America to emerging agribusiness consolidations in Latin America. In the United States and Canada, regulatory incentives, carbon credit integration, and robust distribution infrastructures underpin steady adoption of plant-based organic solutions. Conversely, in Brazil and Argentina, rapid expansion of commercial row cropping has fostered demand for cost-effective granular and powder fertilizers that support high-yield objectives.

Turning to Europe, Middle East, and Africa, the landscape reflects heterogeneous trajectories. Western European markets prioritize stringent organic certification compliance, driving premium pricing tiers, while Eastern European producers focus on volume-oriented formulations to revitalize soils depleted by intensive cereal production. In the Middle East and North Africa, water-use efficiency and salinity mitigation are front-of-mind, leading to increased experimentation with liquid biostimulants derived from plant residues. Sub-Saharan African markets are gradually embracing value-added imports as logistics and cold-chain improvements reduce cost barriers.

In Asia-Pacific, a blend of smallholder farms and industrial agronomy coexists. China and India are witnessing government-led sustainability mandates that accelerate the transition to organic inputs, fueling growth in regionally adapted granular blends. Meanwhile, Southeast Asian nations are positioning themselves as export hubs for plant-based raw materials, leveraging abundant biomass supply and increasingly sophisticated processing capabilities.

Across all regions, strategic partnerships between local distributors and global innovators are unlocking new market segments, ensuring that product portfolios and service models align with unique agronomic conditions, regulatory landscapes, and purchasing behaviors.

Highlighting Leading Strategic Alliances Proprietary Technology Investments and ESG Commitments that Elevate Market Leadership in Plant-Based Organic Fertilizer Manufacturing

Leading companies in the plant-based organic fertilizer sector are differentiating through a blend of strategic investments, cross-industry alliances, and proprietary formulation technologies. Research-driven firms are forging collaborations with agricultural universities and biotech start-ups to refine microbial consortia and enhance nutrient-release kinetics. These partnerships not only accelerate innovation but also create defensible intellectual property in a competitive market landscape.

Several manufacturers have initiated forward integration by acquiring biomass processing facilities or forging supply agreements with major agricultural cooperatives. This approach secures raw material pipelines while enabling granular control over quality standards. Meanwhile, others are embedding digital agronomy platforms into their service offerings, providing growers with real-time nutrient management recommendations and predictive analytics that guide optimized application schedules.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) narratives have become a focal point for industry leaders. Top-tier firms are publicly disclosing life-cycle assessments of their products, setting carbon reduction targets, and participating in global sustainability forums. These efforts resonate with large retailers and institutional buyers that prioritize transparency and traceability in their procurement criteria.

Mergers and acquisitions are reshaping competitive landscapes, as well. Consolidation among mid-tier players is driving scale efficiencies, while strategic partnerships with equipment manufacturers and agri-tech providers are expanding go-to-market reach. Collectively, these strategic moves illustrate the diverse playbook that companies employ to capture value in this rapidly evolving market segment.

Strategic Roadmap Deliverables and Best Practice Recommendations to Bolster Competitiveness in the Evolving Plant-Based Organic Fertilizer Market Landscape

Industry leaders should prioritize the integration of advanced biotechnologies into their product pipelines to stay ahead of emerging agronomic challenges. By investing in tailored microbial strains and enzyme carriers, companies can deliver differentiated nutrient solutions that address specific crop and soil health requirements. In addition, embedding data-driven agronomy tools within service agreements will enhance customer retention and drive subscription-based revenue models.

Diversification of raw material sourcing through long-term supply agreements and co-located processing facilities can mitigate the impact of tariff fluctuations and logistics disruptions. Such vertical integration not only stabilizes input costs but also provides scalable capacity to support growth in high-demand regions.

Building flexible packaging solutions that cater to both smallholder and commercial farm segments will expand addressable markets. Innovative formats such as modular bulk dispensers and compostable packaging can appeal to environmentally conscious end users and reinforce sustainability narratives.

Furthermore, forging collaborative research partnerships with academic institutions and technology incubators will accelerate product validation and shorten time-to-market cycles. These alliances can also facilitate cross-licensing opportunities and co-development of digital platforms that integrate nutrient monitoring, IoT-enabled application tracking, and performance benchmarking.

Finally, establishing transparent ESG reporting frameworks and aligning with global sustainability certifications will strengthen brand credibility among key stakeholders, including retailers, food processors, and governmental bodies. By operationalizing these recommendations, industry leaders can fortify their competitive positioning and drive resilient growth.

Comprehensive Methodological Framework Employing Rigorous Primary Interviews Secondary Data Triangulation and Expert Validation to Deliver Actionable Market Intelligence

This analysis is grounded in a hybrid research framework that synthesizes qualitative insights and quantitative validation to ensure comprehensive coverage. Primary research involved in-depth interviews with fertilizer processors, agronomists, distributors, and end-user growers across major geographies. These conversations provided nuanced perspectives on product performance, channel dynamics, and emerging adoption barriers.

Secondary research encompassed a rigorous review of industry publications, regulatory filings, white papers, and trade association reports. Publicly available data on agricultural practices, environmental policies, and commodity trade flows were triangulated to establish baseline market context and identify key inflection points.

Market sizing and segmentation were corroborated through a bottom-up approach, leveraging shipment volumes, production capacity data, and historical growth trends. Qualitative findings from expert interviews were cross-referenced with secondary sources to validate assumptions and refine segmentation models across product types, crop categories, application methods, packaging formats, and distribution channels.

Additionally, a series of validation workshops were conducted with subject-matter experts to stress-test preliminary conclusions, ensuring that forecasts and strategic implications reflect current realities and plausible future scenarios. Risk assessments were integrated to account for policy elasticity, raw material availability, and macroeconomic volatility.

Overall, this methodological rigor ensures that the insights presented are both empirically grounded and strategically actionable, equipping stakeholders with the evidence base needed to make informed decisions.

Synthesizing Key Strategic Imperatives Future Outlook and Critical Success Factors for Resilient Growth in the Plant-Based Organic Fertilizer Sector

The trajectory of plant-based organic fertilizers is shaped by the confluence of technological innovation, regulatory evolution, and shifting consumer expectations. As the agronomic potential of plant-derived nutrient solutions becomes increasingly evident, stakeholders are realigning strategies to capture value in a market defined by sustainability imperatives and resilience demands.

Segment-level insights underscore the importance of tailoring formulations to specific crop and application profiles, while regional assessments reveal differentiated growth pathways driven by regulatory incentives, infrastructure maturity, and raw material endowments. Competitive dynamics continue to intensify as leading players pursue strategic partnerships, digital platform integration, and ESG-driven differentiation.

Going forward, success will hinge on the ability to navigate policy fluctuations-such as the 2025 tariff adjustments-without compromising price competitiveness or supply chain integrity. Companies that harness data analytics, invest in proprietary biotechnologies, and cultivate flexible supply networks will be best positioned to respond to evolving end-user needs and climatic challenges.

Ultimately, this report offers a holistic blueprint for decision-makers seeking to leverage market opportunities while advancing sustainability goals. The insights contained herein aim to guide strategic planning, investment prioritization, and collaborative innovation efforts in this dynamic sector.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Increasing adoption of plant-based organic fertilizers in commercial crop production to meet sustainability goals
  • 5.2. Development of nutrient-dense seaweed and algae-based fertilizer formulations for improved soil microbiome health
  • 5.3. Integration of plant-derived biofertilizers with smart irrigation systems for precision nutrient delivery and water efficiency
  • 5.4. Rising consumer demand for certified organic plant-based fertilizers driving innovation in non-GMO ingredient sourcing
  • 5.5. Expansion of small-scale urban farming fueling demand for compact plant-based fertilizer blends tailored to container gardens
  • 5.6. Collaborations between biotechnology startups and agrochemical firms to commercialize sustainable plant-based fertilizer alternatives
  • 5.7. Emergence of plant-based fertilizer pellets enriched with slow-release biopolymers for sustained nutrient supply
  • 5.8. Innovations in biogenic humic acid extraction from agricultural byproducts for enhanced root development in diverse soil types
  • 5.9. Development of multi-strain rhizobacteria consortia derived from plant waste for synergistic nutrient mobilization in field trials
  • 5.10. Growth of subscription-based delivery models offering customized plant-based fertilizer blends based on farm-level soil analytics

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Granular
  • 8.3. Liquid
  • 8.4. Powder

9. Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market, by Crop Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Cereals & Grains
  • 9.3. Fruits & Vegetables
  • 9.4. Oilseeds & Pulses

10. Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market, by Application Method

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Foliar Application
  • 10.3. Soil Application

11. Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market, by Packaging Type

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Bags
  • 11.3. Drums

12. Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Offline
    • 12.2.1. Retailers
    • 12.2.2. Wholesalers
  • 12.3. Online
    • 12.3.1. E-Commerce Platforms
    • 12.3.2. Manufacturer Websites

13. Americas Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. United States
  • 13.3. Canada
  • 13.4. Mexico
  • 13.5. Brazil
  • 13.6. Argentina

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. United Kingdom
  • 14.3. Germany
  • 14.4. France
  • 14.5. Russia
  • 14.6. Italy
  • 14.7. Spain
  • 14.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 14.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 14.10. South Africa
  • 14.11. Denmark
  • 14.12. Netherlands
  • 14.13. Qatar
  • 14.14. Finland
  • 14.15. Sweden
  • 14.16. Nigeria
  • 14.17. Egypt
  • 14.18. Turkey
  • 14.19. Israel
  • 14.20. Norway
  • 14.21. Poland
  • 14.22. Switzerland

15. Asia-Pacific Plant-Based Organic Fertilizers Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. China
  • 15.3. India
  • 15.4. Japan
  • 15.5. Australia
  • 15.6. South Korea
  • 15.7. Indonesia
  • 15.8. Thailand
  • 15.9. Philippines
  • 15.10. Malaysia
  • 15.11. Singapore
  • 15.12. Vietnam
  • 15.13. Taiwan

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Nutrien Ltd.
    • 16.3.2. Benefert B.V.
    • 16.3.3. California Organic Fertilizers Inc.
    • 16.3.4. Coromandel International Limited
    • 16.3.5. Haifa Group Ltd.
    • 16.3.6. ICL Group Ltd
    • 16.3.7. Indogulf BioAg LLC
    • 16.3.8. Italpollina S.p.A.
    • 16.3.9. Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co., Ltd.
    • 16.3.10. Krishak Bharati Cooperative Limited
    • 16.3.11. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
    • 16.3.12. Midwestern BioAg
    • 16.3.13. Nature Care Fertilizers
    • 16.3.14. Sustane Natural Fertilizer, Inc.
    • 16.3.15. Tata Chemicals Ltd.
    • 16.3.16. The Andersons, Inc.
    • 16.3.17. The Mosaic Company
    • 16.3.18. The Scotts Company LLC
    • 16.3.19. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
    • 16.3.20. Valagro Group S.p.A.
    • 16.3.21. Wesfarmers Limited
    • 16.3.22. Yara International ASA

17. ResearchAI

18. ResearchStatistics

19. ResearchContacts

20. ResearchArticles

21. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦