½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1806218

¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : ±¸¼º¿ä¼Òº°, µð¹ÙÀ̽º À¯Çüº°, »ç¿ë ±â°£º°, ȯÀÚ ¿¬·ÉÃþº°, ¿ëµµº°, À¯Åë ä³Îº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market by Component, Type of Device, Duration of Use, Patient Age Group, Application, Distribution Channel, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 197 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡´Â 44¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â 47¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯, CAGR 7.26%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 68¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ 2024³â 44¾ï 7,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ 2025³â 47¾ï 9,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ 2030³â 68¾ï 2,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 7.26%

Àü ¼¼°è Çö´ë ´ç´¢º´ °ü¸®¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ÈûÀ¸·Î ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ÃâÇöÀ» ޱ¸ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÃÖ±Ù ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀº Ç÷´ç ¼öÄ¡ÀÇ Áß´Ü ¾ø´Â ½Ç½Ã°£ ÃßÀûÀ» Á¦°øÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¸¸¼ºÁúȯ °ü¸®¸¦ ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÁøÈ­´Â ÀÓ»óÀÇ¿Í È¯ÀÚ°¡ Ãß¼¼¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, º¯È­¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϰí, ´Éµ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î °³ÀÔÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·ÏÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¼øÂ÷ÀûÀÎ ÇΰŽºÆ½ °Ë»ç¿¡¼­ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ±â¹Ý Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ» ÀüȯÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ´ç´¢º´ À¯º´·üÀÌ °è¼Ó Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÇ·áÁøÀº ÇÕº´ÁõÀ» ÁÙÀÌ°í »îÀÇ ÁúÀ» Çâ»ó½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °³ÀÎÈ­µÇ°í ½Å¼ÓÇÑ Ä¡·á¸¦ Á¦°øÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ȯÀÚ ¿¹Èĸ¦ °³¼±ÇÏ´Â ½Ç½Ã°£ Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ¿¡ Çõ¸íÀ» °¡Á®¿Ã ȹ±âÀûÀÎ Áøº¸¿Í ÅëÇÕ ±â¼ú ¹ßÇ¥

¼¾¼­ÀÇ ¼ÒÇüÈ­, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ¿¬°á, ¿¹Ãø ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀ¸·Î Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÇ »óȲÀº Å©°Ô º¯È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ãֽбâ±â´Â ´õ ÀÌ»ó ´Üµ¶À¸·Î ÀÛµ¿ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ½º¸¶Æ®Æù, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå µ¥ÀÌÅͺ£À̽º, ¿ø°Ý ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ Ç÷§Æû°ú ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô ÅëÇյǾî ÀÇ·áÆÀÀÌ °ÅÀÇ ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áö¿øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ »óÈ£¿î¿ë¼ºÀ¸·ÎÀÇ ÀüȯÀº µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ±æÀ» ¿­°í, Ä¡·á Á¶Á¤À» À¯µµÇϰí, ±Þ¼º Ç÷´ç »ç°ÇÀÇ À§ÇèÀ» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¦°øÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°ü¼¼ °­È­ Á¶Ä¡°¡ ¹Ì±¹ ³» ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ºñ¿ë ¹× °ø±Þ¸Á ¿ªÇп¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ Æò°¡

2025³â °³Á¤ °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡°¡ µµÀԵǸ鼭 ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ À¯ÅëÀÇ °ø±Þ¸Á Ãë¾àÁ¡ÀÌ ºÎ°¢µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î ÀüÀÚ ¼¾¼­, ¹«¼± ¼Û¼ö½Å±â µî ÁÖ¿ä ºÎǰ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼öÀÔ °ü¼¼ ÀλóÀº Á¦Á¶ ÆÄÀÌÇÁ¶óÀο¡ ºñ¿ë ¾Ð·ÂÀ» °¡Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÀϺΠ°ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀº Á¶´Þ Àü·«À» ´Ù¾çÈ­Çϰí, »ý»ê ½Ã¼³À» ÃÖÁ¾ ½ÃÀå ±Ùó·Î ÀÌÀüÇϰųª ¿îÀÓ ¹× °ü¼¼ ÀλóÀ» ¿ÏÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇØ ´ëü ¿øÀÚÀç °è¾àÀ» Çù»óÇÏ´Â µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ³ë·ÂÀ» ±â¿ïÀ̰í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò, ÀåÄ¡ À¯Çü, »ç¿ë ±â°£, ȯÀÚ Àα¸Åë°è, ¿ëµµ, À¯Åë ä³Î¿¡ °ÉÄ£ ½ÃÀå ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ±¸Ãà

¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ »ìÆìº¸¸é, ´ÙÂ÷¿øÀûÀ¸·Î ¸íÈ®ÇÑ ¼ö¿ä ÃËÁø¿äÀΰú Çõ½ÅÀÇ °æ·Î¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò ºÐ¼®À» °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§, ÀÌ ¾÷°è´Â Á¤È®µµ¸¦ Çâ»ó½Ã۱â À§ÇØ ¼¾¼­ °³¹ß¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¸ð´ÏÅÍ¿Í ¼ö½Å±â´Â °í±Þ °æ°í ¾Ë°í¸®Áò°ú ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ǰúÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀ» Áö¿øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¹«¼± µ¥ÀÌÅÍ Áß°è ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ´Â ¼Û½Å±â ¸ðµâÀº ¹èÅ͸® ¼ö¸íÀ» ¿¬ÀåÇϰí À¯Áöº¸¼ö °³ÀÔÀ» ÁÙÀÌ´Â Àú¿¡³ÊÁö ¼Òºñ ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝÀÇ ÀÌÁ¡À» °è¼Ó ´©¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÇ Áö¿ªÀû Â÷ÀÌ¿Í ¼ºÀå ÀáÀç·Â ±Ô¸í

Áö¿ªÀû Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ Ã¤Å÷ü, »óȯ Àü·« ¹× Á¦Ç° Á¦°ø¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«¿¡¼­´Â źźÇÑ ÀÇ·á ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í Áö¿øÀûÀÎ »óȯ Á¤Ã¥À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÁÖ¿ä °æÁ¦±ÇÀÌ Â÷¼¼´ë µð¹ÙÀ̽º¸¦ °¡Àå ¸ÕÀú µµÀÔÇÏ´Â ±¹°¡·Î ÀÚ¸®¸Å±èÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Áö¿ªÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀǵéÀº Ç¥ÁØ Ä¡·á ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ¿¡ ¿ø°Ý ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀ» Á¡Á¡ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ ÅëÇÕÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, »óȯ Á¦µµ °³ÇõÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Àå½Ã°£ Âø¿ëÇü ¼¾¼­¿Í ÅëÇÕ ºÐ¼® Ç÷§ÆûÀÇ Àû¿ë ¹üÀ§°¡ È®´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä °ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀÇ Àü·«Àû ¿òÁ÷ÀÓ, Á¦Ç° Çõ½Å, Çù¾÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÐ¼®

¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä °ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀº °æÀï ¿ìÀ§¸¦ À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ Á¦Ç° Çõ½Å, Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ, Ç¥ÀûÈ­ µÈ Àμö¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¾¼­ ±â¼úÀÇ ¼±±¸ÀÚµéÀº ¿¹Ãø °æ°í¸¦ Á¦°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀ» °³¼±Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ´Ù¸¥ °ø±ÞÀÚµéÀº ÀüÀڰǰ­±â·Ï ¹× ¿ø°ÝÀÇ·á ¼­ºñ½º¿ÍÀÇ »óÈ£ ¿î¿ë¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇØ ¿øÈ°ÇÑ Ç÷§Æû ÅëÇÕ¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» ¸ÂÃß°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àåºñ Á¦Á¶¾÷ü ¹× ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î °³¹ß ȸ»ç¿ÍÀÇ °øµ¿ °³¹ßÀ» ÅëÇØ µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ Çϵå¿þ¾î¿Í °í±Þ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ½Ã°¢È­ ¹× ¿ø°Ý ÄÚĪ ¸ðµâÀ» °áÇÕÇÑ ¿£µå-Åõ-¿£µå ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÌ Åº»ýÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÇ º¸±ÞÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí, ȯÀÚ °æÇèÀ» °³¼±Çϸç, °ø±Þ¸Á º¹¿ø·ÂÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¾÷°è ¸®´õ¸¦ À§ÇÑ Àü·« ¼ö¸³

ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ¿ªÇÐÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ´Â ¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ Ç÷§Æû¿¡ °í±Þ ºÐ¼® ±â´ÉÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¿¡ µÎ¾î¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀΰøÁö´É°ú ¸Ó½Å·¯´× ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀ» ÅëÇÕÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÇ·áÁøÀº ȯÀÚÀÇ ¼øÀÀµµ¸¦ °³¼±ÇÏ°í ¿ø°Ý ÀÓ»óÀû ÆÇ´ÜÀ» Áö¿øÇÏ´Â °³ÀÎÈ­µÈ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¿ø°ÝÀÇ·á Ç÷§Æû ¹× ÀüÀڰǰ­±â·Ï °ø±Þ¾÷ü¿ÍÀÇ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» È®´ëÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á °æ·Î¿¡¼­ ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÇ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´õ¿í °­È­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ À§ÇÑ °­·ÂÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁý, ºÐ¼® ¹× °ËÁõÀ» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇØ Ã¤ÅÃµÈ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý·Ð ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼ºÎ »çÇ×

º» ºÐ¼®ÀÇ ±âÃʰ¡ µÇ´Â Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ýÀº 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿Í 2Â÷ Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ÁúÀû ÀλçÀÌÆ®ÀÇ ±íÀÌ¿Í Á¤È®¼ºÀ» È®º¸Çϱâ À§ÇÑ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿¡¼­´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¿ÀÇǴϾ𠸮´õ, ³»ºÐºñÇÐÀÚ, ´ç´¢º´ ±³À°ÀÚ, Á¶´Þ °ü¸®ÀÚ¿ÍÀÇ ±¸Á¶È­µÈ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ »õ·Î¿î Æ®·»µå¿Í ¿î¿µ»óÀÇ °úÁ¦¸¦ È®ÀÎÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ³íÀÇ´Â ÀÓ»ó µµÀÔ ÀÏÁ¤, »ç¿ëÀÚ ¼±È£µµ, Áö¿ªº°·Î ´Þ¶óÁú ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »óȯÀÇ ´µ¾Ó½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸Æ¶ôÀ» Á¦°øÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀÌ ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ÁøÈ­Çϴ ȯ°æÀ» Ž»öÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÁÖ¿ä °üÂû »çÇ×°ú ÇâÈÄ °í·Á »çÇ×À» ¿ä¾àÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾àÀº ±â¼úÀû Çõ½Å°ú °ü¼¼ÀÇ ¿µÇâ, ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ¹× Áö¿ªÀû ¿ªÇп¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â ´Ù°¢ÀûÀÎ Èû¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¼³¸íÇß½À´Ï´Ù. Áß¿äÇÑ °üÂû °á°ú, ÀåºñÀÇ Çõ½ÅÀº ¼¾¼­ÀÇ Á¤È®¼º»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ¿¬°á¼º, »ç¿ëÀÚ °æÇè, °ø±Þ¸Á °ß°í¼º µî¿¡µµ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â´Ù´Â »ç½ÇÀÌ ¹àÇôÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ º¯È­ÇÏ´Â ¹«¿ª Á¤Ã¥Àº ¹ÎøÇÑ Á¦Á¶¿Í ´Ù¾çÇÑ À¯Åë¸ÁÀÇ Çʿ伺À» °­Á¶Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : ±¸¼º¿ä¼Òº°

  • ¼ö½Å±â/¸ð´ÏÅÍ
  • ¼¾¼­
  • ¼Û½Å±â

Á¦9Àå ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : µð¹ÙÀ̽º Á¾·ùº°

  • ÅëÇÕ CGM ½Ã½ºÅÛ
  • µ¶¸³Çü CGM ½Ã½ºÅÛ

Á¦10Àå ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : »ç¿ë ±â°£º°

  • Àå±â À̽ÄÇü CGM
  • ´Ü±â ¿þ¾î·¯ºí CGM

Á¦11Àå ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : ȯÀÚ ¿¬·ÉÃþº°

  • ¼ºÀÎ
  • ¾Æµ¿
  • ³ëÀÎ

Á¦12Àå ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • ÀӽŠ´ç´¢º´
  • 1Çü ´ç´¢º´
  • 2Çü ´ç´¢º´

Á¦13Àå ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : À¯Åë ä³Îº°

  • ¿ÀÇÁ¶óÀÎ
  • ¿Â¶óÀÎ
    • E-Commerce Ç÷§Æû
    • Á¦Á¶¾÷ü À¥»çÀÌÆ®

Á¦14Àå ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • ¿Ü·¡ ¼ö¼ú ¼¾ÅÍ
  • ÀçÅà ÄÉ¾î ¼³Á¤
  • º´¿ø°ú Áø·á¼Ò
    • ÀÔ¿ø ȯÀÚ ¾à±¹
    • ¿Ü·¡ ¾à±¹

Á¦15Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦16Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦17Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ¿¬¼Ó Ç÷´ç ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ ½Ã½ºÅÛ ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦18Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l
    • Abbott Laboratories
    • AgaMatrix Inc. by I-Sens Inc.
    • Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG
    • Dexcom, Inc.
    • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
    • Insulet Corporation
    • Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
    • Medtronic PLC
    • Medtrum Technologies Inc.
    • Nemaura Medical Inc.
    • Novo Nordisk A/S
    • NXP Semiconductors N.V.
    • Senseonics Holdings Inc.
    • Sibionics
    • Signos, Inc.
    • STMicroelectronics N.V.
    • Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
    • Texas Instruments Incorporated
    • Ypsomed Holding AG

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦21Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦22Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦23Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSM

The Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market was valued at USD 4.47 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.79 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.26%, reaching USD 6.82 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 4.47 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 4.79 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 6.82 billion
CAGR (%) 7.26%

Exploring the Emergence of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems as a Pivotal Force Shaping Modern Diabetes Management Practices Globally

In recent years, continuous glucose monitoring systems have redefined chronic disease management by providing uninterrupted, real time tracking of glycemic levels. This evolution has shifted the paradigm from episodic fingerstick testing to a continuous data driven approach, enabling clinicians and patients to identify trends, anticipate fluctuations, and intervene proactively. As diabetes prevalence continues to rise, pressure mounts on healthcare providers to deliver personalized, responsive care that mitigates complications and enhances quality of life.

Amidst this backdrop, technological breakthroughs in sensor accuracy, wireless communication, and user interface design have accelerated adoption among diverse patient populations. Regulatory bodies have responded by refining approval pathways and reimbursement guidelines, fostering an environment where novel devices can transition more swiftly from conception to clinical use. At the same time, integration with digital health platforms and telemedicine services has created new opportunities to collect, analyze, and apply glycemic data within holistic care frameworks.

As we embark on this exploration of system dynamics, it is essential to appreciate how stakeholder collaboration, patient empowerment, and technological innovation converge to shape an ecosystem that supports continuous monitoring. This introduction establishes the context for subsequent analysis, setting the stage for an examination of transformative shifts, tariff influences, segmentation nuances, regional variations, corporate strategies, and actionable recommendations that define today's continuous glucose monitoring landscape.

Unveiling Groundbreaking Advancements and Integrative Technologies Revolutionizing Real Time Glucose Monitoring for Enhanced Patient Outcomes

The landscape of glucose monitoring is undergoing a profound transformation as sensor miniaturization, cloud connectivity, and predictive algorithms converge. Modern devices no longer operate in isolation; they integrate seamlessly with smartphones, cloud databases, and remote monitoring platforms, allowing healthcare teams to respond in near real time. This shift toward continuous interoperability has unlocked new pathways for data analytics, yielding insights that guide therapy adjustments and reduce the risk of acute glycemic events.

Concurrently, breakthroughs in biocompatible materials and energy harvesting techniques have extended sensor lifespans, reducing patient burden and improving long term adherence. Miniature electrodes and advanced polymers now enable implantable systems to function for months without replacement, while wearable patches continue to evolve in shape and form factor to maximize comfort and discretion. Furthermore, artificial intelligence is being harnessed to forecast glycemic excursions, delivering automated alerts that preempt dangerous hypo- or hyperglycemia.

Together, these developments signal a move away from reactive care and toward proactive disease management. Patients are empowered to interpret personalized glucose patterns, clinicians can optimize therapy regimens with unprecedented precision, and payers benefit from reduced hospitalization rates. As we examine how these innovations reshape practice models, the broader implication is clear: glucose monitoring is no longer a diagnostic exercise, but a continuous dialogue between patient, clinician, and technology ecosystem.

Assessing the Impact of Enhanced Tariff Measures on the Cost and Supply Chain Dynamics of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in the United States

The introduction of revised tariff measures in 2025 has brought supply chain fragility to the forefront of continuous glucose monitoring system distribution. Increased import duties on key components, including microelectronic sensors and wireless transceivers, have injected cost pressures into manufacturing pipelines. In response, several suppliers have diversified sourcing strategies, relocating production facilities closer to end markets and negotiating alternative raw material contracts to mitigate freight and duty escalations.

Amidst rising input costs, distributors and healthcare providers have sought to manage affordability concerns by consolidating procurement volumes and revising contract structures. Strategic collaborations between device manufacturers and logistics partners now emphasize inventory optimization and transparent cost pass through, aiming to preserve accessibility for patients who depend on uninterrupted glucose monitoring. At the same time, regulatory authorities are reassessing reimbursement frameworks to accommodate incremental pricing adjustments tied to tariff fluctuations.

Through these adaptations, the industry is demonstrating resilience in the face of policy shifts that could otherwise impede supply continuity. While short term adjustments in pricing tiers and contract terms may be necessary, the long term emphasis remains on fostering stable distribution channels and ensuring that device availability aligns with patient needs. This section highlights the interplay between trade policy and operational strategy, underscoring how tariff landscapes will continue to influence system deployment across the United States.

Delving into Market Segmentation Structured Across Components, Device Types, Usage Durations, Patient Demographics, Applications, and Distribution Channels

A granular examination of continuous glucose monitoring system segmentation reveals distinct demand drivers and innovation pathways across multiple dimensions. When considering component analysis, the industry has witnessed robust investment in sensor development to improve precision, while monitors and receivers have evolved to support advanced alert algorithms and integration with mobile applications. Transmitter modules, responsible for wireless data relay, continue to benefit from low energy consumption protocols that extend battery life and reduce maintenance interventions.

From the perspective of device type, integrated systems that combine sensor and transmitter within a unified wearable platform are gaining traction among patients seeking streamlined form factors. In parallel, standalone systems remain relevant for users who prefer modular configurations or who require rapid sensor replacement without altering monitor infrastructure. Duration of use also differentiates solutions, with long term implantable systems offering discrete, extended wear for patients with demanding adherence requirements, and short term wearable patches providing flexible options for intermittent monitoring or clinical trial settings.

Patient age group segmentation underscores unique user needs. Adult populations drive demand for sophisticated analytics and integration with digital health suites, whereas pediatric and geriatric cohorts prioritize simplicity of use and minimal skin irritation. Application segments further delineate system optimization strategies, as gestational diabetes monitoring calls for compact, easy to manage devices, type 1 diabetes management emphasizes insulin dosing accuracy, and type 2 diabetes patients often require intuitive interfaces that promote lifestyle modifications.

Distribution channel analysis highlights a dual track of offline channels-specialty clinics, pharmacies, and medical device distributors-and online avenues that span both third party eCommerce platforms and manufacturer websites. End user settings range from ambulatory surgical centers deploying perioperative monitoring solutions to home care environments favoring plug-and-play devices, as well as hospitals and clinics that rely on in-house pharmacy networks, including inpatient and outpatient pharmacies, to supply critical components. This segmentation framework illuminates where value creation and competitive differentiation converge across the continuous glucose monitoring ecosystem.

Uncovering Regional Variances and Growth Potential in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Across Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific Markets

Regional variation plays a pivotal role in shaping adoption rates, reimbursement strategies, and product offerings for continuous glucose monitoring systems. In the Americas, robust healthcare infrastructure and supportive reimbursement policies have positioned key economies as early adopters of next generation devices. Clinicians in this region increasingly incorporate remote monitoring into standard care protocols, and reimbursement reforms are expanding coverage for extended wear sensors and integrated analytics platforms.

Contrastingly, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa present a mosaic of regulatory frameworks and purchasing power dynamics. Western European countries benefit from centralized health technology assessments that streamline market access, whereas emerging markets in Eastern Europe and the Middle East navigate evolving reimbursement guidelines and logistical constraints. Across Africa, distribution challenges and limited healthcare budgets necessitate cost efficient solutions, sparking interest in partnerships that localize manufacturing and training programs to support clinical adoption.

In the Asia Pacific region, rapid urbanization, escalating diabetes prevalence, and expanding private healthcare expenditures are driving demand for portable, user friendly monitoring solutions. Markets such as Japan and Australia are characterized by early integration of digital health services, while Southeast Asian economies are fostering tiered access models that prioritize affordability and basic functionality. Interregional collaborations and technology transfer initiatives are further accelerating penetration in underserved areas, creating a dynamic environment where regional insights inform global market strategies.

Analyzing the Strategic Movements, Product Innovations, and Collaborations Driving Leading Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Providers Forward

Leading providers of continuous glucose monitoring systems are leveraging product innovation, strategic alliances, and targeted acquisitions to maintain competitive advantage. Pioneers in sensor technology are refining algorithms to deliver predictive alerts, while others focus on seamless platform integration to enhance interoperability with electronic health records and telemedicine services. Joint ventures between device manufacturers and software developers have resulted in end to end solutions that pair proprietary hardware with advanced data visualization and remote coaching modules.

Innovation pipelines are supported by collaborations with academic institutions and healthcare organizations, where real world evidence studies validate device performance across diverse patient cohorts. Intellectual property portfolios are expanded through filings in emerging geographies, ensuring that patented sensor chemistries and wireless protocols are protected globally. Simultaneously, select participants have pursued strategic acquisitions of complementary technology firms to fill product portfolio gaps and accelerate time to market.

In addition to technology partnerships, several providers are optimizing their commercial footprints through enhanced distribution agreements and logistics alliances. These collaborations streamline inventory management, reduce lead times, and support targeted marketing initiatives that educate clinicians and patients on system benefits. The combined effect of these strategic movements is a robust competitive landscape where leadership is defined by both technological differentiation and executional excellence.

Formulating Strategies for Industry Leaders to Accelerate Adoption, Enhance Patient Experience, and Optimize Supply Chain Resilience in Glucose Monitoring

Industry leaders seeking to capitalize on evolving dynamics should prioritize integration of advanced analytics into monitoring platforms. By embedding artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, providers can offer personalized insights that improve patient compliance and support remote clinical decision support. Simultaneously, expanding partnerships with telehealth platforms and electronic medical record vendors will cement the role of continuous glucose monitoring in comprehensive care pathways.

To address supply chain vulnerabilities exposed by recent tariff adjustments, organizations should diversify manufacturing locations and develop redundancy protocols for critical components. Engaging with contract development and manufacturing organizations in multiple regions can mitigate disruptions, while negotiating flexible contractual terms with logistics partners will enable rapid response to policy changes. Furthermore, adopting value based pricing models in collaboration with payers can preserve device affordability and secure long term reimbursement commitments.

Patient engagement strategies should be enhanced through user centric design and robust educational programs. Co-creating device features with end users and clinicians will ensure that form factors and interface designs resonate with target demographics. Lastly, ongoing investment in real world evidence generation will strengthen clinical value propositions, support regulatory approvals in new markets, and reinforce stakeholder confidence in system efficacy.

Detailing the Rigorous Methodological Framework Employed to Ensure Robust Data Collection, Analysis, and Validation for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Insights

The research methodology underpinning this analysis combines primary qualitative insights with comprehensive secondary data synthesis to ensure depth and accuracy. Primary research involved structured interviews with key opinion leaders, endocrinologists, diabetes educators, and procurement managers to validate emerging trends and operational challenges. These discussions provided context on clinical adoption timelines, user preferences, and regional reimbursement nuances.

Secondary research encompassed a review of regulatory filings, public company disclosures, industry white papers, and scientific literature to triangulate findings and map technological trajectories. Data extraction focused on device approvals, patent activity, key partnership announcements, and tariff policy documentation. This process was augmented by a meticulous assessment of logistical and distribution frameworks across major healthcare markets.

Throughout the study, a cross functional analytical framework was applied to segment insights by component, device type, usage duration, patient demographics, application, distribution channel, and end user setting. Regional analyses were informed by health technology assessments and national reimbursement guidelines. Finally, all findings underwent multi stage validation with subject matter experts to eliminate bias and confirm relevance for stakeholders across product development, commercialization, and policy domains.

Summarizing Critical Observations and Future Considerations to Guide Stakeholders in Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems

This executive summary has illuminated the multifaceted forces shaping continuous glucose monitoring systems, from technological breakthroughs and tariff influences to granular segmentation and regional dynamics. Critical observations reveal that device innovation is not solely defined by sensor accuracy, but also by connectivity, user experience, and supply chain robustness. At the same time, shifting trade policies underscore the need for agile manufacturing and diversified distribution networks.

Segmentation insights highlight distinct value levers across patient cohorts, application types, and channel preferences, informing how providers can tailor solutions to meet unique clinical and consumer demands. Regional analyses demonstrate that while high income markets prioritize integration and reimbursement alignment, emerging economies are ripe for cost efficient offerings and local manufacturing initiatives. Meanwhile, leading companies continue to differentiate through strategic partnerships, intellectual property expansion, and customer centric commercialization strategies.

Looking ahead, stakeholders must balance innovation with operational resilience, embracing data driven decision making and collaborative frameworks that span technology vendors, healthcare providers, and payers. By synthesizing these strategic imperatives, organizations will be well positioned to navigate an evolving landscape that places continuous monitoring at the heart of diabetes management and preventive care.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Integration of artificial intelligence algorithms for predictive glucose management in CGM systems
  • 5.2. Expansion of interoperable CGM platforms with insulin pumps and digital health applications
  • 5.3. Development of minimally invasive sensor technologies for extended wear continuous glucose monitors
  • 5.4. Adoption of non-enzymatic glucose sensing methods to enhance sensor stability and reduce calibration
  • 5.5. Implementation of cloud-based data analytics and telehealth integration for real-time patient monitoring
  • 5.6. Emergence of dual-hormone delivery systems combined with CGM for automated glucose regulation
  • 5.7. Growing emphasis on patient-centric design with flexible patches and extended wear sensors
  • 5.8. Regulatory approvals accelerating availability of next-generation implantable CGM devices
  • 5.9. Strategic partnerships between CGM manufacturers and pharma companies to personalize diabetes therapies
  • 5.10. Advances in sensor miniaturization and nanotechnology to improve accuracy and reduce invasiveness

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Receivers/Monitors
  • 8.3. Sensors
  • 8.4. Transmitters

9. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market, by Type of Device

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Integrated CGM Systems
  • 9.3. Standalone CGM Systems

10. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market, by Duration of Use

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Long-Term Implantable CGMs
  • 10.3. Short-Term Wearable CGMs

11. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market, by Patient Age Group

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Adults
  • 11.3. Children
  • 11.4. Geriatric

12. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Gestational Diabetes
  • 12.3. Type 1 Diabetes
  • 12.4. Type 2 Diabetes

13. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Offline
  • 13.3. Online
    • 13.3.1. eCommerce Platforms
    • 13.3.2. Manufacturer Websites

14. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market, by End User

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
  • 14.3. Home Care Settings
  • 14.4. Hospitals & Clinics
    • 14.4.1. Inpatient Pharmacies
    • 14.4.2. Outpatient Pharmacies

15. Americas Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. United States
  • 15.3. Canada
  • 15.4. Mexico
  • 15.5. Brazil
  • 15.6. Argentina

16. Europe, Middle East & Africa Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market

  • 16.1. Introduction
  • 16.2. United Kingdom
  • 16.3. Germany
  • 16.4. France
  • 16.5. Russia
  • 16.6. Italy
  • 16.7. Spain
  • 16.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 16.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 16.10. South Africa
  • 16.11. Denmark
  • 16.12. Netherlands
  • 16.13. Qatar
  • 16.14. Finland
  • 16.15. Sweden
  • 16.16. Nigeria
  • 16.17. Egypt
  • 16.18. Turkey
  • 16.19. Israel
  • 16.20. Norway
  • 16.21. Poland
  • 16.22. Switzerland

17. Asia-Pacific Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Market

  • 17.1. Introduction
  • 17.2. China
  • 17.3. India
  • 17.4. Japan
  • 17.5. Australia
  • 17.6. South Korea
  • 17.7. Indonesia
  • 17.8. Thailand
  • 17.9. Philippines
  • 17.10. Malaysia
  • 17.11. Singapore
  • 17.12. Vietnam
  • 17.13. Taiwan

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 18.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 18.3.1. A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l
    • 18.3.2. Abbott Laboratories
    • 18.3.3. AgaMatrix Inc. by I-Sens Inc.
    • 18.3.4. Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG
    • 18.3.5. Dexcom, Inc.
    • 18.3.6. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
    • 18.3.7. Insulet Corporation
    • 18.3.8. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
    • 18.3.9. Medtronic PLC
    • 18.3.10. Medtrum Technologies Inc.
    • 18.3.11. Nemaura Medical Inc.
    • 18.3.12. Novo Nordisk A/S
    • 18.3.13. NXP Semiconductors N.V.
    • 18.3.14. Senseonics Holdings Inc.
    • 18.3.15. Sibionics
    • 18.3.16. Signos, Inc.
    • 18.3.17. STMicroelectronics N.V.
    • 18.3.18. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
    • 18.3.19. Texas Instruments Incorporated
    • 18.3.20. Ypsomed Holding AG

19. ResearchAI

20. ResearchStatistics

21. ResearchContacts

22. ResearchArticles

23. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦