시장보고서
상품코드
1808253

자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장 : 구성요소별, 모듈별, 자산 유형별, 전개 방식별, 조직 규모별, 업종별 - 세계 예측(2025-2030년)

Asset Performance Management Market by Component, Module, Asset Type, Deployment Type, Organization Size, Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2030

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 187 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장은 2024년에는 53억 2,000만 달러로 평가되었으며, 2025년에는 58억 5,000만 달러, CAGR 10.47%로 성장하여 2030년에는 96억 7,000만 달러에 달할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 2024년 53억 2,000만 달러
추정 연도 2025년 58억 5,000만 달러
예측 연도 2030년 96억 7,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 10.47%

자산 성과 관리(APM)의 중요한 역할이 운영의 탄력성을 높이고 업계 전반의 전략적 우위를 확보하는 데 중요한 역할을 한다는 사실을 확인했습니다.

자산 성과 관리(APM)는 조직에 자산의 건전성, 신뢰성, 수명주기 전략을 최적화할 수 있는 종합적인 프레임워크를 제공함으로써 운영 우수성의 핵심으로 부상하고 있습니다. 디지털 전환과 경쟁 압력으로 정의되는 시대에 경영진과 비즈니스 리더들은 비용 효율성을 높이고, 리스크를 줄이며, 자산 포트폴리오의 미개발 가치를 실현하기 위해 통합 APM 플랫폼에 점점 더 많은 관심을 기울이고 있습니다.

전례 없는 기술적, 운영적 파괴를 극복하고 자산의 신뢰성과 유지보수 관행을 변화시키고 있습니다.

디지털 혁신이 진화하는 비즈니스 모델과 융합하면서 자산 성과 관리(APM)의 환경은 변화의 시기를 맞이하고 있습니다. 전통적인 유지보수 패러다임은 클라우드 네이티브 플랫폼, 자동 진단, 실시간 상태 모니터링의 보급으로 파괴되고 있습니다. 이러한 기술적 진보는 인공지능의 통합으로 보완되어 인간의 능력을 능가하는 이상 징후를 감지하고 유지보수 일정을 최적화할 수 있습니다.

2025년 미국 관세 조치의 누적된 영향이 공급망 경제와 자산 성능 프로토콜을 재구성하는 방법을 평가합니다.

2025년 발효되는 미국 관세 조치의 누적된 영향은 세계 공급망 경제, 나아가 자산 성과 관리(APM) 전략을 재구성하고 있습니다. 수입 장비 및 교체 부품에 의존하는 조직은 비용 상승과 리드 타임의 장기화에 직면하여 유지보수 계획과 재고 재고를 전략적으로 조정해야 합니다.

구성요소별, 모듈별, 자산 유형별, 전개 방식별, 조직 규모별, 업종별 세분화에 대한 종합적인 인사이트 제공

시장 세분화에 대한 미묘한 이해는 자산 성과 관리(APM) 솔루션을 조직의 요구에 맞게 조정하는 데 필수적입니다. 구성요소 수준에서 시장은 서비스와 솔루션으로 나뉘며, 서비스 범주에는 관리형 오퍼링과 전문 지식이 포함되며, 솔루션 영역은 자산 무결성, 신뢰성, 전략, 상태 모니터링 및 예측 관리에 이르기까지 다양합니다. 이 이중 구조로 인해 기업은 성숙도와 자원의 유무에 따라 턴키 지원과 전문 기술 역량을 추구할 수 있습니다.

자산 성과 관리(APM) 도입 패턴 정의, 아메리카, 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카, 아시아태평양의 역동성 확인

지역적 역동성은 자산 성과 관리(APM)의 채택과 혁신을 형성하는 데 있어 매우 중요한 역할을 합니다. 아메리카에서는 디지털 성숙도와 IIoT 인프라에 대한 투자로 인해, 특히 제조 및 에너지 생산 시설 전반에 걸쳐 고급 분석 및 예측 유지보수의 조기 도입이 촉진되고 있습니다. 아메리카의 조직들이 규제 압력과 경쟁 환경에 대응하는 과정에서 자산의 신뢰성을 보다 광범위한 운영 우수성 프레임워크에 통합하는 데 중점을 두고 있습니다.

전략적 파트너십과 기술 로드맵을 통해 자산 성과 관리(APM)의 미래를 만들어갈 주요 혁신가 및 전략가 프로파일링

자산 성과 관리(APM) 생태계의 주요 업체들은 고급 분석, 전문 분야, 확장 가능한 전개 모델을 통합하는 능력으로 두각을 나타내고 있습니다. 주요 기술 벤더들은 세계 시스템 통합업체와 전략적 파트너십을 맺고 센서 배치, 데이터 수집, 모델 개발, 변경 관리 서비스를 포함한 엔드투엔드 서비스를 제공하고 있습니다.

실행 가능한 전략과 모범 사례를 수립하고 지속가능한 성장을 위한 자산 성과 관리(APM) 최적화에 대한 업계 리더의 역량을 강화합니다.

자산 성과 관리(APM)의 가치를 극대화하고자 하는 업계 리더들은 비즈니스 목표와 성과 측정 기준을 명확히 하는 것부터 시작하는 단계적 도입 접근 방식을 채택해야 합니다. 조직은 부서 간 거버넌스 구조를 확립하여 유지보수 팀, 재무 및 경영진 간의 협력을 보장하고, 책임과 지속적 개선의 문화를 조성할 수 있습니다.

데이터 수집부터 분석 프레임워크까지, 자산 성과 관리(APM) 조사를 뒷받침하는 엄격한 조사 방법 공개

이번 조사는 엄격성, 타당성, 투명성을 보장하기 위해 설계된 구조화된 조사 방법으로 진행되었습니다. 1차 데이터 수집을 위해 다양한 업계의 고위 경영진, 유지보수 관리자, 기술 전문가와의 심층 인터뷰를 통해 도입 촉진요인, 도입 과제, 성과 결과에 대한 생생한 인사이트를 수집했습니다.

세계 산업에서 자산 성과 관리(APM)의 전략적 중요성과 미래 궤적에 대한 주요 하이라이트 통합 및 강조

디지털화, 규제 변화, 무역 정책의 변화로 인해 조직은 정교한 자산 성과 관리(APM) 전략을 채택할 것을 요구받고 있습니다. 주요 연구 결과에 따르면, 예측 분석을 통한 사전 예방적 유지보수는 계획되지 않은 다운타임을 줄일 뿐만 아니라, 지속가능성 지표를 강화하고 성과 기반 서비스 모델을 지원하는 것으로 나타났습니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 역학

제6장 시장 인사이트

  • Porter's Five Forces 분석
  • PESTEL 분석

제7장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장 : 구성요소별

  • 서비스
    • 매니지드 서비스
    • 전문 서비스
  • 솔루션
    • 자산 무결성 관리
    • 자산 신뢰성 관리
    • 자산 전략 관리
    • 상태 모니터링
    • 예측 자산 관리

제9장 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장 : 모듈별

  • 자산 건전성
  • 자산 신뢰성
  • 자산 전략

제10장 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장 : 자산 유형별

  • 고정 자산
  • 인프라 자산
  • 모바일 자산
  • 생산 자산

제11장 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장 : 전개 방식별

  • 클라우드
  • 온프레미스

제12장 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장 : 조직 규모별

  • 대기업
  • 중소기업

제13장 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장 : 업종별

  • 화학제품·석유화학제품
  • 에너지·유틸리티
  • 식품 및 음료
  • 정부·방위
  • 헬스케어·의약품
  • 제조
    • 디스크리트 제조
    • 중공업
    • 프로세스 제조
  • 석유 및 가스
    • 다운스트림
    • 미드스트림
    • 업스트림
  • 통신
    • 데이터센터
    • 네트워크 인프라
    • 전송 네트워크

제14장 아메리카의 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 아르헨티나

제15장 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카의 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장

  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 아랍에미리트
  • 사우디아라비아
  • 남아프리카공화국
  • 덴마크
  • 네덜란드
  • 카타르
  • 핀란드
  • 스웨덴
  • 나이지리아
  • 이집트
  • 튀르키예
  • 이스라엘
  • 노르웨이
  • 폴란드
  • 스위스

제16장 아시아태평양의 자산 성과 관리(APM) 시장

  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국
  • 인도네시아
  • 태국
  • 필리핀
  • 말레이시아
  • 싱가포르
  • 베트남
  • 대만

제17장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • ABB Ltd.
    • Bentley Systems, Incorporated
    • AB SKF
    • Accenture PLC
    • Dassault Systemes SE
    • DNV Group AS
    • EAMbrace by Gaurik Solutions, Inc.
    • Emerson Electric Co.
    • Fortive Corporation
    • GE Vernova Inc.
    • Gray Matter Systems
    • Hexagon AB
    • Hitachi, Ltd.
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • IFS AB
    • Innovapptive Inc.
    • International Business Machines Corporation
    • IPS Intelligent Process Solutions GmbH
    • Kongsberg Digital
    • ManWinWin Software
    • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
    • Nexus Global Business Solutions, Inc.
    • Oracle Corporation
    • Pragma Group
    • Rockwell Automation, Inc.
    • SAP SE
    • Schneider Electric SE
    • Siemens AG
    • Tata Consultancy Services
    • Yokogawa Electric Corporation

제18장 리서치 AI

제19장 리서치 통계

제20장 리서치 컨택트

제21장 리서치 기사

제22장 부록

KSM 25.09.23

The Asset Performance Management Market was valued at USD 5.32 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 5.85 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 10.47%, reaching USD 9.67 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 5.32 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 5.85 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 9.67 billion
CAGR (%) 10.47%

Unveiling the Critical Role of Asset Performance Management in Elevating Operational Resilience and Driving Strategic Advantages Across Industries

Asset Performance Management (APM) has emerged as a cornerstone of operational excellence, providing organizations with a holistic framework to optimize asset health, reliability, and lifecycle strategies. Within an era defined by digital transformation and intensifying competitive pressures, executives and operational leaders are increasingly turning to integrated APM platforms to drive cost efficiencies, mitigate risks, and unlock untapped value in their asset portfolios.

As industries grapple with aging infrastructure, evolving regulatory demands, and talent shortages, the imperative for real-time visibility into asset performance has never been greater. Advanced analytics, driven by IoT-enabled sensors and machine learning algorithms, are enabling predictive maintenance that preempts failures and extends asset lifecycles. Through seamless collaboration between maintenance teams, data scientists, and executive leadership, APM fosters a proactive culture that shifts the focus from reactive repairs to strategic asset stewardship.

This introduction sets the stage for a deep dive into the forces shaping APM adoption, the external market dynamics influencing asset optimization, and the strategic levers organizations can deploy to future-proof their operations. By navigating this executive summary, decision-makers will gain clarity on emerging trends, key drivers, and actionable recommendations to harness the full potential of asset performance management within their enterprises.

Navigating Unprecedented Technological and Operational Disruptions That Are Transforming Asset Reliability and Maintenance Practices Across Sectors

The landscape of asset performance management is undergoing transformative shifts as digital innovation converges with evolving business models. Traditional maintenance paradigms are being disrupted by the widespread adoption of cloud-native platforms, automated diagnostics, and real-time condition monitoring. These technological advancements are complemented by the integration of artificial intelligence, enabling anomaly detection that surpasses human capabilities and optimizes maintenance schedules.

Simultaneously, the rise of outcome-based service agreements is driving service providers and end users to align on shared performance indicators, incentivizing reliability and uptime. This shift is catalyzing new commercial models where pay-per-use structures and performance guarantees redefine vendor-client relationships.

Furthermore, regulatory emphasis on sustainability and carbon reduction is propelling organizations to embed energy-efficient practices into asset management strategies. As a result, sustainability metrics are now intrinsic to APM platforms, enabling firms to quantify environmental impact alongside traditional performance KPIs. Together, these converging forces are forging a foundational shift in how assets are managed, from isolated repair tasks to an integrated lifecycle governance approach.

Evaluating How the Cumulative Impact of 2025 United States Tariff Measures Reshapes Supply Chain Economics and Asset Performance Protocols

The cumulative impact of United States tariff measures set to take effect in 2025 is reshaping global supply chain economics and, by extension, asset performance management strategies. Organizations relying on imported equipment and replacement parts are facing elevated costs and longer lead times, which necessitate strategic adjustments to maintenance planning and inventory stocking.

These tariff-induced pressures are driving firms to reassess vendor portfolios, explore nearshoring options, and strengthen supplier diversification. As part of this strategic realignment, many organizations are accelerating digital twin initiatives to virtually simulate asset behavior under varying market conditions and cost scenarios. By leveraging predictive analytics, companies can preemptively identify cost-effective maintenance windows and optimize spare parts procurement, mitigating the financial impacts of increased import duties.

In parallel, these trade policy shifts are encouraging closer collaboration between procurement, finance, and operations teams. The interdepartmental synergy fostered by APM platforms is proving invaluable in modeling tariff scenarios, quantifying total cost of ownership, and informing capital expenditure decisions. Ultimately, the tariff landscape is driving a heightened emphasis on agility, data-driven insights, and integrated decision frameworks within asset performance management.

Distilling Comprehensive Insights from Component Module Asset Type Deployment Organization Size and Vertical Segmentation within Asset Performance Management

A nuanced understanding of market segmentation is essential for tailoring asset performance management solutions to organizational needs. At the component level, the market bifurcates into services and solutions, with the services category inclusive of managed offerings and professional expertise, while the solutions domain extends across asset integrity, reliability, strategy, condition monitoring, and predictive management. This dual structure enables firms to pursue either turnkey support or specialized technological capabilities, depending on their maturity and resource availability.

Delving into functional modules, platforms are designed to address asset health assessments, reliability optimization, and strategic lifecycle planning, ensuring that maintenance initiatives align with broader business objectives. Asset types span a broad spectrum-fixed infrastructure, mobile fleets, production line equipment, and critical utility assets-each demanding tailored performance strategies to maximize uptime and minimize operational risk.

Deployment flexibility further differentiates the market, as organizations may opt for cloud-based environments to benefit from scalability and rapid updates, or on-premises installations to meet stringent data governance requirements. Structurally, the division between large enterprises and small to medium-sized organizations reflects divergent priorities in procurement cycles, resource allocation, and digital adoption rates. Vertically, the solutions ecosystem extends across chemicals and petrochemicals, energy and utilities, food and beverages, government and defense, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, manufacturing in its discrete, heavy, and process subsegments, oil and gas along downstream, midstream, and upstream pathways, and telecommunications across data centers, network infrastructure, and transmission networks. This comprehensive segmentation insight enables vendors and end users to calibrate their strategies, ensuring optimal alignment of APM capabilities with domain-specific challenges and regulatory mandates.

Identifying Regional Dynamics in the Americas Europe Middle East & Africa and Asia-Pacific That Define Asset Performance Management Adoption Patterns

Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping asset performance management adoption and innovation. In the Americas, digital maturity and investments in IIoT infrastructure are driving early adoption of advanced analytics and predictive maintenance, particularly across manufacturing hubs and energy production facilities. As organizations in North and South America navigate regulatory pressures and competitive landscapes, there is a clear emphasis on integrating asset reliability with broader operational excellence frameworks.

Across Europe, the Middle East and Africa, regulatory stringency around safety, emissions, and sustainability is a significant catalyst for APM deployment. Firms in these regions are prioritizing compliance-driven strategies that leverage asset performance platforms to monitor environmental impact, manage maintenance backlogs, and optimize capital allocation in aging infrastructure sectors.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization, urbanization, and infrastructure expansion are fueling demand for scalable asset management solutions. Governments and private enterprises alike are embracing smart city initiatives and renewable energy projects, fostering a conducive environment for APM platforms that can aggregate data across distributed networks, anticipate asset failures, and support large-scale digital transformations.

These regional contours underscore the importance of context-driven strategies that account for varying regulatory regimes, technology readiness levels, and investment priorities, enabling stakeholders to craft localized roadmaps for asset performance optimization.

Profiling Leading Innovators and Strategists Shaping the Future of Asset Performance Management with Strategic Partnerships and Technology Roadmaps

Key players in the asset performance management ecosystem are distinguished by their ability to integrate advanced analytics, domain expertise, and scalable deployment models. Leading technology vendors are forging strategic partnerships with global system integrators to deliver end-to-end offerings that encompass sensor deployment, data ingestion, model development, and change management services.

These companies are also investing heavily in continuous innovation, rolling out enhancements to machine learning algorithms, digital twin capabilities, and mobile-first interfaces to meet the evolving needs of field technicians and executive stakeholders. Their collaborative approach with research institutions and industry consortia is accelerating the development of open standards and interoperability frameworks that reduce deployment friction.

On the service side, specialized consultancies are differentiating themselves through outcome-based contracts that tie fees to measurable improvements in asset reliability and downtime reduction. By combining pragmatic change management methodologies with deep industry vertical expertise, these firms are driving high adoption rates and customer satisfaction levels.

Collectively, these market leaders are setting the pace for digital transformation in asset management, leveraging robust ecosystems of partners, data platforms, and user-centric applications to deliver quantifiable business outcomes.

Formulating Actionable Strategies and Best Practices to Empower Industry Leaders in Optimizing Asset Performance Management for Sustainable Growth

Industry leaders seeking to maximize the value of asset performance management should adopt a phased implementation approach that begins with a clear articulation of business objectives and performance metrics. By establishing a cross-functional governance structure, organizations can ensure alignment between maintenance teams, finance, and executive leadership, fostering a culture of accountability and continuous improvement.

Next, investing in foundational data integrity measures-such as standardized naming conventions, calibration schedules, and sensor health checks-will provide a reliable basis for advanced analytics. Once data readiness is achieved, teams should pilot predictive maintenance initiatives on high-impact assets to demonstrate quick wins and secure stakeholder buy-in.

As the program scales, integrating sustainability KPIs alongside operational metrics will reinforce environmental commitments and unlock potential regulatory incentives. Equally important is the ongoing development of workforce capabilities through targeted training programs and knowledge-sharing forums that equip technicians with the skills to interpret analytics and execute proactive interventions.

By combining strategic planning, data governance, pilot deployments, sustainability integration, and workforce enablement, industry leaders can accelerate their asset performance management maturity and achieve long-term resilience and competitiveness.

Unveiling the Rigorous Research Methodology Underpinning This Asset Performance Management Study from Data Collection to Analytical Frameworks

This study was conducted through a structured research methodology designed to ensure rigor, relevance, and transparency. Primary data collection involved in-depth interviews with senior executives, maintenance managers, and technology specialists across diverse industries, capturing firsthand insights into adoption drivers, deployment challenges, and performance outcomes.

Secondary research complemented these findings with extensive reviews of industry publications, white papers, regulatory filings, and academic journals. Market participants were profiled based on publicly available information, including annual reports, press releases, and technical documentation, to map competitive landscapes and strategic positioning.

Quantitative analysis incorporated proprietary data modelling techniques, leveraging statistical validation to identify correlations between technology investments and operational performance improvements. Qualitative synthesis was guided by thematic coding and triangulation procedures to ensure that interpretations accurately reflect stakeholder experiences and market realities.

Throughout the process, adherence to ethical guidelines and confidentiality agreements was maintained to protect proprietary business information. This hybrid research approach underpins the credibility of the insights presented, enabling decision-makers to base their strategies on a comprehensive and balanced evidence base.

Synthesizing Key Findings to Highlight the Strategic Imperatives and Future Trajectories in Asset Performance Management Across Global Industries

The confluence of digitalization, regulatory evolution, and shifting trade policies has created a compelling imperative for organizations to adopt sophisticated asset performance management strategies. Key findings reveal that proactive maintenance driven by predictive analytics not only reduces unplanned downtime but also enhances sustainability metrics and supports outcome-based service models.

Segmentation insights underscore the importance of aligning solution offerings with organizational scale, industry-specific asset profiles, and deployment preferences, while regional trends highlight the variable maturity levels and regulatory incentives influencing adoption. Leading vendors and service providers are distinguished by their integrated ecosystems, robust data platforms, and collaborative partnership strategies that enable seamless implementation and continuous enhancement.

Industry leaders that embrace a structured, data-driven approach-prioritizing governance, pilot initiatives, workforce development, and sustainability integration-are best positioned to achieve long-term resilience and competitive advantage. As the landscape continues to evolve, the organizations that leverage comprehensive asset performance management frameworks will secure operational excellence and drive strategic growth across global markets.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Adoption of AI-driven predictive maintenance solutions for minimizing unplanned asset downtime
  • 5.2. Real-time asset health monitoring through IoT sensor integration and edge computing analytics
  • 5.3. Deployment of digital twin frameworks for enhancing asset lifecycle visibility and optimization
  • 5.4. Integration of cloud-based APM platforms with enterprise resource planning for unified data insights
  • 5.5. Leveraging augmented reality support tools to streamline field maintenance and technician training
  • 5.6. Implementation of cybersecurity protocols in APM systems to safeguard critical operational data
  • 5.7. Utilizing advanced analytics to balance asset performance with sustainability and carbon reduction targets
  • 5.8. Emphasis on remote monitoring capabilities post-pandemic to ensure continuous asset reliability and uptime
  • 5.9. Addressing skills shortage through digital training platforms and collaborative knowledge management in APM
  • 5.10. Navigating evolving regulatory compliance requirements for asset performance under global environmental standards

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Asset Performance Management Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Services
    • 8.2.1. Managed Services
    • 8.2.2. Professional Services
  • 8.3. Solutions
    • 8.3.1. Asset Integrity Management
    • 8.3.2. Asset Reliability Management
    • 8.3.3. Asset Strategy Management
    • 8.3.4. Condition Monitoring
    • 8.3.5. Predictive Asset Management

9. Asset Performance Management Market, by Module

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Asset Health
  • 9.3. Asset Reliability
  • 9.4. Asset Strategy

10. Asset Performance Management Market, by Asset Type

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Fixed Assets
  • 10.3. Infrastructure Assets
  • 10.4. Mobile Assets
  • 10.5. Production Assets

11. Asset Performance Management Market, by Deployment Type

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Cloud
  • 11.3. On-premises

12. Asset Performance Management Market, by Organization Size

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Large Enterprises
  • 12.3. Small & Medium-sized Enterprises

13. Asset Performance Management Market, by Vertical

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Chemicals & Petrochemicals
  • 13.3. Energy & Utilities
  • 13.4. Food & Beverages
  • 13.5. Government & Defence
  • 13.6. Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
  • 13.7. Manufacturing
    • 13.7.1. Discrete Manufacturing
    • 13.7.2. Heavy Manufacturing
    • 13.7.3. Process Manufacturing
  • 13.8. Oil & Gas
    • 13.8.1. Downstream
    • 13.8.2. Midstream
    • 13.8.3. Upstream
  • 13.9. Telecommunications
    • 13.9.1. Data Centers
    • 13.9.2. Network Infrastructure
    • 13.9.3. Transmission Networks

14. Americas Asset Performance Management Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. United States
  • 14.3. Canada
  • 14.4. Mexico
  • 14.5. Brazil
  • 14.6. Argentina

15. Europe, Middle East & Africa Asset Performance Management Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. United Kingdom
  • 15.3. Germany
  • 15.4. France
  • 15.5. Russia
  • 15.6. Italy
  • 15.7. Spain
  • 15.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 15.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 15.10. South Africa
  • 15.11. Denmark
  • 15.12. Netherlands
  • 15.13. Qatar
  • 15.14. Finland
  • 15.15. Sweden
  • 15.16. Nigeria
  • 15.17. Egypt
  • 15.18. Turkey
  • 15.19. Israel
  • 15.20. Norway
  • 15.21. Poland
  • 15.22. Switzerland

16. Asia-Pacific Asset Performance Management Market

  • 16.1. Introduction
  • 16.2. China
  • 16.3. India
  • 16.4. Japan
  • 16.5. Australia
  • 16.6. South Korea
  • 16.7. Indonesia
  • 16.8. Thailand
  • 16.9. Philippines
  • 16.10. Malaysia
  • 16.11. Singapore
  • 16.12. Vietnam
  • 16.13. Taiwan

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 17.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 17.3.1. ABB Ltd.
    • 17.3.2. Bentley Systems, Incorporated
    • 17.3.3. AB SKF
    • 17.3.4. Accenture PLC
    • 17.3.5. Dassault Systemes SE
    • 17.3.6. DNV Group AS
    • 17.3.7. EAMbrace by Gaurik Solutions, Inc.
    • 17.3.8. Emerson Electric Co.
    • 17.3.9. Fortive Corporation
    • 17.3.10. GE Vernova Inc.
    • 17.3.11. Gray Matter Systems
    • 17.3.12. Hexagon AB
    • 17.3.13. Hitachi, Ltd.
    • 17.3.14. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 17.3.15. IFS AB
    • 17.3.16. Innovapptive Inc.
    • 17.3.17. International Business Machines Corporation
    • 17.3.18. IPS Intelligent Process Solutions GmbH
    • 17.3.19. Kongsberg Digital
    • 17.3.20. ManWinWin Software
    • 17.3.21. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
    • 17.3.22. Nexus Global Business Solutions, Inc.
    • 17.3.23. Oracle Corporation
    • 17.3.24. Pragma Group
    • 17.3.25. Rockwell Automation, Inc.
    • 17.3.26. SAP SE
    • 17.3.27. Schneider Electric SE
    • 17.3.28. Siemens AG
    • 17.3.29. Tata Consultancy Services
    • 17.3.30. Yokogawa Electric Corporation

18. ResearchAI

19. ResearchStatistics

20. ResearchContacts

21. ResearchArticles

22. Appendix

샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제