½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1808270

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå : ±¸¼º¿ä¼Òº°, ½½¶óÀ̽º À¯Çüº°, ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ·¹º§º°, Àü°³ ¸ðµ¨º°, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ ¾÷Á¾º° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Network Slicing Market by Component, Slice Type, Level Of Slicing, Deployment Model, Organization Size, End User Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 183 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀåÀº 2024³â¿¡ 15¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 2025³â¿¡´Â 18¾ï 6,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯, CAGR 20.63%·Î ¼ºÀåÇÏ¿© 2030³â¿¡´Â 47¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ 2024³â 15¾ï 5,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ 2025³â 18¾ï 6,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ 2030³â 47¾ï 8,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 20.63%

Åë½Å ½ÃÀåÀÇ Àü·«Àû °úÁ¦, ±â¼úÀû ±â¹Ý, ¹Ì·¡¸¦ ÇâÇÑ Çõ½Å ÃËÁø¿äÀÎÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ´Â ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì °³¿ä

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀº ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ¼³°è, °ü¸®, ¼öÀÍÈ­ ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ ÀüȯÀ» ÀǹÌÇϸç, ´ÜÀÏ ¹°¸®Àû ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ÀÎÇÁ¶óÀÇ ¿©·¯ ³í¸®Àû ÀνºÅϽº¸¦ ÅëÇØ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼º´É ¹× º¸¾È ¿ä±¸»çÇ×À» °¡Áø ¸ÂÃãÇü ¼­ºñ½º¸¦ Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µË´Ï´Ù. Á¦°ø ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µË´Ï´Ù. 5G ¹× ¿§Áö ÄÄÇ»ÆÃÀÇ º¸±Þ°ú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ½ÃÀÛµÈ ÀÌ ±â¼úÀº ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷ü¿Í ±â¾÷ÀÌ ÀÚ¿øÀ» È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐÇÒÇÏ¿© ±¤´ë¿ªÆø, Ãʰí½Å·Ú¼º ¶Ç´Â ´ë±Ô¸ð ±â°è½Ä Åë½Å ¼ö¿ä¸¦ °¢°¢ ŸÇùÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ´ëÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇØÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ÀÚµ¿Â÷, ÇコÄɾî, Á¦Á¶, ¹Ìµð¾î, °ø°ø¾ÈÀü µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¾÷Á¾ÀÇ ±â¾÷µéÀÌ °¢ÀÚÀÇ ´ÏÁî¿¡ ¸Â´Â Ä¿³ØÆ¼ºñƼ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» ã°í ÀÖ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀº Â÷º°È­¿Í ¼ºÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû µµ±¸·Î ºÎ»óÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

5G ÁøÈ­¿¡¼­ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ´É·Â, ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³, ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø ¸ðµ¨À» Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â ±â¼úÀû, ±ÔÁ¦Àû º¯È­ÀÇ ¸ÅÇÎ

°¡»óÈ­, Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹À̼Ç, ¿§Áö ÄÄÇ»ÆÃ ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³ÀÇ È¹±âÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀÇ »óȲÀº Å©°Ô º¯È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ãʱ⿡´Â 4G ³×Æ®¿öÅ©¸¦ ºÐÇÒÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀÌ·ÐÀû ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©·Î °í¾ÈµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, ÀÌÈÄ °­È­µÈ ¸ð¹ÙÀÏ ±¤´ë¿ªºÎÅÍ ÃÊÀúÁö¿¬, Ãʽŷڼº, ÀúÁö¿¬ Åë½Å±îÁö ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼­ºñ½º Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À¸¦ ½ÇÇöÇÏ´Â ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÄÁÅ×À̳ÊÈ­¿Í ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ ±Þ¼ÓÇÑ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î »ç¾÷ÀÚµéÀº ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ±â´ÉÀ» ºÐ¸®Çϰí, ¸ÂÃãÇü ½½¶óÀ̽º¸¦ ºü¸£°Ô ¹èÆ÷Çϰí, ½Ç½Ã°£ ¼ö¿ä¿¡ µû¶ó µ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î È®ÀåÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

2025³â ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ °³Á¤ÀÌ ¼¼°è ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì °ø±Þ¸Á, ºñ¿ë ±¸Á¶, Çù¾÷ »ýŰ迡 ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ¿µÇâ Æò°¡

¹Ì±¹ÀÌ Åë½ÅÀåºñ, ¹ÝµµÃ¼ ºÎǰ, °ü·Ã ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¿¡ ºÎ°úÇÑ 2025³â °ü¼¼´Â ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì »ýŰè Àüü¿¡ º¹ÀâÇÑ ºñ¿ë ¾Ð¹ÚÀ» °¡Á®¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù. ±¹³» Á¦Á¶¾÷ü¸¦ º¸È£Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¶Ä¡´Â ±¤Àü¼Û ¸ðµâ ¹× ¹«¼± ¾×¼¼½º ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò¿Í °°Àº Áß¿äÇÑ Çϵå¿þ¾î¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼öÀÔ °ü¼¼ ÀλóÀ¸·Î À̾îÁ® ½½¶óÀ̽º Áö¿ø ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿¡ ÅõÀÚÇÏ´Â »ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ ÀÚº» ÁöÃâÀ» Áõ°¡½ÃÄ×½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀϺΠ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷ü´Â °ø±Þ¾÷ü¿ÍÀÇ °è¾àÀ» Àç°ËÅäÇϰí, ¼ö·® ÇÒÀÎÀ» Çù»óÇϰųª ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç ¹× À¯·´¿¡¼­ ´ëü °ø±Þó¸¦ ã°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±¸¼º¿ä¼Òº°, ½½¶óÀ̽º À¯Çüº°, ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ·¹º§º°, ±¸Ãà ¸ðµ¨º°, Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ ¾÷Á¾º° ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ¼¼ºÐÈ­

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ºÐ¼®Àº ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò, ½½¶óÀ̽º À¯Çü, ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ·¹º§, Àü°³ ¸ðµ¨, ±â¾÷ ±Ô¸ð, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ »ê¾÷º°·Î Â÷º°È­µÈ ¿ªÇÐÀ» º¸¿©ÁÝ´Ï´Ù. ±¸¼º¿ä¼Ò Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ Çϵå¿þ¾î ÅõÀÚ´Â ±âÁö±¹, Àü¼Û Àåºñ, ¿¡Áö ³ëµå¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇϸç, ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î Ç÷§ÆûÀº ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹À̼Ç, ºÐ¼®, º¸¾È µµ±¸ ¼¼Æ®¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¼­ºñ½º Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â Àü·«Àû ÄÁ¼³ÆÃºÎÅÍ ´Ù´Ü°è µµÀÔ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®, Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ À¯Áöº¸¼ö ¹× Áö¿ø ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©±îÁö Æ÷ÇԵ˴ϴÙ.

¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì µµÀÔ, Çõ½Å, »ýŰè Çù¾÷À» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â Àü·«Àû Áö¿ªÀû ¿ªµ¿¼º

°¢ Áö¿ªÀÇ ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐÀº ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀÇ µµÀÔ ¼Óµµ, »ýÅÂ°è ¼º¼÷µµ, µµÀÔÀ» °ü¸®ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌĨ´Ï´Ù. ¹Ì±¹ ´ë·ú¿¡¼­´Â ¼­ºñ½º Á¦°ø¾÷üµéÀÌ 5G Á֯ļö ´ë¿ª ÇÒ´ç°ú °ß°íÇÑ »ç¼³ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© °³³äÀÇ ÇýÅÃÀ» ´©¸®°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Á¦Á¶ ÀÚµ¿È­ ¹× ½º¸¶Æ® ¹°·ù¸¦ À§ÇÑ Ä·ÆÛ½º ±Ô¸ðÀÇ ½½¶óÀ̽º ¹èÆ÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ°¡ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿¬¹æ Á¤ºÎ ±â°ü°ú Åë½Å »ç¾÷ÀÚÀÇ Çù·ÂÀ¸·Î °ø°ø¾ÈÀü ¹× ¿ø°ÝÀÇ·á ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ½Ã¹ü ÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ÅëÇØ ÀÌ Áö¿ªÀÌ µðÁöÅÐ º¹¿ø·ÂÀ» Àü·«ÀûÀ¸·Î Áß¿äÇÏ°Ô ¿©±â°í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àü·«Àû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê, ±â¼ú ·Îµå¸Ê, »ýŰè Á¦ÈÞ, °øµ¿»ç¾÷À» ÅëÇÑ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå ¸®´õ ºÐ¼®

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷µéÀº °æÀïÀû Â÷º°È­¸¦ À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ À¯±âÀû Çõ½Å°ú Ç¥ÀûÈ­µÈ ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» °áÇÕÇÑ ´Ù°¢ÀûÀÎ Àü·«À» Àü°³Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¼¼°è Åë½Å Àåºñ ¾÷üµéÀº Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ¿£Áø°ú AI ±â¹Ý ¾Ö³Î¸®Æ½½º¸¦ ÇÙ½É Ç÷§Æû¿¡ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© »ç¾÷ÀÚ°¡ ½½¶óÀ̽º ÇÁ·ÎºñÀú´×°ú ¼º´É ÃÖÀûÈ­¸¦ ÀÚµ¿È­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áö¿øÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î Àü¹®°¡´Â Á¦·Î Æ®·¯½ºÆ® ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³¿Í ¾Ïȣȭ¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÑ º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ °­È­ÇÏ¿© ±â¾÷ÀÇ ¾÷Á¾¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ÄÄÇöóÀ̾𽺠¿ä°ÇÀ» ÁؼöÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï Áö¿øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì µµÀÔÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­Çϰí, ¿î¿µÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­Çϸç, º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ½ÇÇà °¡´ÉÇÑ Àü·«À¸·Î ¾÷°è ¸®´õµé¿¡°Ô ÈûÀ» ½Ç¾îÁÝ´Ï´Ù.

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀÇ È®´ëµÇ´Â ±âȸ¸¦ ÃÖ´ëÇÑ È°¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº ±â¼ú ÅõÀÚ¿Í Àü·«Àû »ç¿ë »ç·Ê¸¦ ÀÏÄ¡½ÃŰ´Â ¸íÈ®ÇÑ ·Îµå¸ÊÀ» ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¿¡ µÎ¾î¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °³¹æÇü ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ÇÁ·Î±×·¡¹Ö ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽º¿Í ¸ðµâÇü ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³¸¦ äÅÃÇÏ¿© »õ·Î¿î »ýÅÂ°è ÆÄÆ®³Ê¿ÍÀÇ ÅëÇÕÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­ÇÏ°í º¥´õÀÇ Á¾¼Ó¼ºÀ» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹ÀÌ¼Ç °èÃþ¿¡ °í±Þ ºÐ¼® ¹× ÀÚµ¿È­¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÏ¿© ½½¶óÀ̽ºÀÇ ¼º´ÉÀ» ½Ç½Ã°£À¸·Î ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÇÏ°í ¸®¼Ò½º¸¦ ¼±Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¶Á¤ÇÏ¿© ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º°ú ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

1Â÷ ÀÎÅͺä, Àü¹®°¡º° ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ, °­·ÂÇÑ °ËÁõ ÇÁ·Î¼¼½º¸¦ °áÇÕÇÑ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ´Ù´Ü°è Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ ¼¼ºÎ »çÇ×

ÀÌ Á¶»ç´Â ¾ö°ÝÇÑ ºÐ¼®°ú ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇØ °í¾ÈµÈ ±¸Á¶È­µÈ ´Ù´Ü°è Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ýÀ» ±â¹ÝÀ¸·Î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ÕÀú Åë½Å»ç °æ¿µÁø, ±â¾÷ IT ¸®´õ, ½Ã½ºÅÛ ÅëÇÕ¾÷ü µî ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµé°úÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ ±â¼úÀû °úÁ¦, ±¸Ãà ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§, ½ÃÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀο¡ ´ëÇÑ »ý»ýÇÑ °üÁ¡À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ 1Â÷ ÀÎÅͺä´Â ÁúÀû ±íÀ̸¦ Á¦°øÇϰí ä¿ë Æ®·»µå¿Í Àü·«Àû Çʼö ¿ä¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁÖ¿ä °¡¼³À» °ËÁõÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀÇ Çõ½Å°ú µµÀÔÀÇ ´ÙÀ½ ¹°°á¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀÇ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ µ½±â À§ÇÑ ÁÖ¿ä Àü·« ¿äÁ¡ ¹× ÇâÈÄ Àü¸Á ¿ä¾à.

³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀÌ ÀÌ·ÐÀû °³³ä¿¡¼­ Â÷¼¼´ë Ä¿³ØÆ¼ºñƼÀÇ Ãʼ®À¸·Î ÁøÈ­Çϸ鼭 ¾÷°è Àü¹Ý¿¡ º¯ÇõÀû ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀÌ ºÐ¸íÇØÁ³½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿Àû ½½¶óÀ̽ÌÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â °¡»óÈ­¿Í Ŭ¶ó¿ìµå ³×ÀÌÆ¼ºê ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®·¹À̼ÇÀÇ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒ, ¼¼°è È®Àå °èȹ¿¡¼­ ±ÔÁ¦¿Í °ü¼¼¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÇ Á߿伺, ¹Ì¼Ç Å©¸®Æ¼ÄÃÇÑ ¾ÖÇø®ÄÉÀ̼ÇÀ» º¸È£ÇÏ´Â °­·ÂÇÑ º¸¾È ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©ÀÇ Çʿ伺 µî Àü·«ÀûÀ¸·Î Áß¿äÇÑ ±³ÈÆÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵǾî ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Áß¿äÇÑ Àü·«Àû ±³ÈÆÀ» ´ã°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå : ±¸¼º¿ä¼Òº°

  • Çϵå¿þ¾î
  • ¼­ºñ½º
    • ÄÁ¼³ÆÃ
    • ±¸Çö
    • Áö¿ø°ú À¯Áö°ü¸®
  • ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î

Á¦9Àå ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå : ½½¶óÀ̽º À¯Çüº°

  • eMBB
  • mMTC
  • URLLC

Á¦10Àå ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå : ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ·¹º§º°

  • ¼öÆò
  • ¼öÁ÷

Á¦11Àå ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå : Àü°³ ¸ðµ¨º°

  • ºñµ¶¸³Çü
  • µ¶¸³Çü

Á¦12Àå ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå : Á¶Á÷ ±Ô¸ðº°

  • ´ë±â¾÷
  • Áß¼Ò±â¾÷

Á¦13Àå ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ ¾÷Á¾º°

  • ÀÚµ¿Â÷
  • ÇコÄɾî
  • Á¦Á¶
  • ¹Ìµð¾î¡¤¿£ÅÍÅ×ÀÎ¸ÕÆ®
  • °ø°ø¾ÈÀü
  • Åë½Å ¼­ºñ½º ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õ
  • ¿î¼Û¡¤¹°·ù

Á¦14Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦15Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦16Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ ³×Æ®¿öÅ© ½½¶óÀÌ½Ì ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦17Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Affirmed Networks Inc.
    • Amdocs, Inc.
    • Broadcom, Inc.
    • BT Group PLC
    • Ciena Corporation
    • Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • Druid Software Limited
    • Firecell
    • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
    • Intel Corporation
    • Juniper Networks, Inc.
    • Mavenir Systems, Inc.
    • Nanjing ZTE Software Co. Ltd.
    • NEC Corporation
    • Niral Networks Pvt. Ltd.
    • Nokia Corporation
    • Parallel Wireless, Inc.
    • Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
    • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    • SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
    • SliceFinity Limited
    • T-Mobile USA, Inc.
    • Tambora Systems Ltd.
    • Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
    • VMware, Inc.

Á¦18Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦21Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦22Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSM 25.09.23

The Network Slicing Market was valued at USD 1.55 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.86 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 20.63%, reaching USD 4.78 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 1.55 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 1.86 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 4.78 billion
CAGR (%) 20.63%

Network Slicing Executive Overview Illustrating the Market's Strategic Imperatives, Technological Foundations, and Future-Ready Innovation Drivers in Telecommunications

Network slicing represents a paradigm shift in the way networks are architected, managed, and monetized, enabling multiple logical instances of a single physical network infrastructure to deliver customized services with diverse performance and security requirements. Launching alongside the proliferation of 5G and edge computing, it allows service providers and enterprises to partition resources efficiently, ensuring that high-bandwidth, ultra-reliable, or massive machine-type communication demands are each met without compromise. As enterprises across automotive, healthcare, manufacturing, media, and public safety verticals seek tailored connectivity solutions, network slicing has emerged as a strategic tool for differentiation and growth.

Driven by virtualization, software-defined networking, and cloud-native principles, this technology dismantles one-size-fits-all architectures and introduces dynamic, on-demand service creation. Beyond mere network segmentation, it unlocks new business models for managed services, consulting, and support & maintenance partners by delivering slices optimized for specific use cases such as autonomous vehicle communication or remote surgical procedures. In turn, telecommunications service providers can accelerate their transition to digital service delivery, improve operational agility, and cultivate ecosystem partnerships to expand value offerings.

This executive summary synthesizes core trends, transformative shifts, and actionable recommendations to guide decision-makers in capitalizing on network slicing's potential. It outlines the influence of regulatory changes, tariff adjustments, segmentation dynamics, regional market profiles, and key vendor strategies, offering a coherent narrative that links technological innovation to strategic imperatives. Readers will gain a holistic understanding of the forces shaping this market and the priorities required to secure a competitive edge.

Mapping the Technological and Regulatory Transformations Reshaping Network Slicing Capabilities, Architectures, and Service Delivery Models in 5G Evolution

The network slicing landscape has undergone profound transformation driven by breakthroughs in virtualization, cloud-native orchestration, and edge computing architectures. Initially conceived as a theoretical framework to partition 4G networks, it has since evolved into a practical enabler of diverse service portfolios ranging from enhanced mobile broadband to ultra-reliable low-latency communication. Rapid advancements in containerization and microservices have allowed operators to decouple network functions, accelerating the rollout of customized slices and scaling them dynamically in response to real-time demand.

Simultaneously, regulatory bodies have updated spectrum policies and established sandbox environments to foster experimentation, catalyzing collaborations between operators, equipment vendors, and enterprise verticals. Industry standardization efforts under 3GPP and ONF have converged around unified slice management protocols, streamlining interoperability and reducing integration overhead. These standards have paved the way for multi-stakeholder ecosystems in which technology providers, systems integrators, and managed service companies jointly deliver end-to-end slice solutions.

Concurrently, artificial intelligence and machine learning innovations are being embedded into slice orchestration, enabling predictive resource allocation and automated fault detection. Edge-native deployments further extend intelligence closer to end users, optimizing throughput and latency for mission-critical applications. As a result, service providers can introduce new service tiers, monetize premium experiences, and differentiate on quality of service. In this context, network slicing has grown from an experimental capability into a cornerstone of 5G and future-generation network strategies, with transformative potential for digital transformation across industries.

Evaluating the Broad Implications of 2025 United States Tariff Changes on Global Network Slicing Supply Chains, Cost Structures, and Collaborative Ecosystems

The 2025 tariffs imposed by the United States on telecommunications equipment, semiconductor components, and related software have introduced complex cost pressures across the network slicing ecosystem. These measures, aimed at protecting domestic manufacturers, have led to increased import duties on critical hardware such as optical transport modules and radio access network components, thereby elevating capital expenditures for operators investing in slice-enabled infrastructure. As a consequence, some service providers have re-evaluated supplier agreements, negotiating volume discounts or seeking alternative sources in Asia-Pacific and Europe.

Moreover, the tariffs have had downstream effects on software licensing and support contracts, where vendors have adjusted pricing to offset higher component costs. This dynamic has, in turn, amplified the importance of managed services and consulting engagements that can mitigate total cost of ownership through optimized deployment models and streamlined maintenance practices. In response, several global technology providers have accelerated investment in local assembly and regional data center footprints to circumvent tariff impacts, while smaller enterprises have prioritized standalone deployment scenarios that require fewer imported modules.

On a strategic level, the tariff environment has underscored the need for resilient supply chains and diversified procurement strategies. Organizations are increasingly incorporating tariff forecasting into their financial planning, deploying contract clauses that account for sudden policy changes. This holistic approach helps maintain project timelines and budgetary discipline, ensuring that network slicing initiatives proceed with minimal disruption. Looking ahead, industry leaders will need to balance short-term mitigation tactics with long-term investments in regional manufacturing alliances to secure stable access to critical components and software licenses.

Illuminating Network Slicing Segmentation Across Core Components, Slice Types, Level Differentiation, Deployment Models, Enterprise Scale, and Industry Verticals

Segmentation analysis of the network slicing market reveals differentiated dynamics across component, slice type, slicing level, deployment model, organization size, and end-user vertical dimensions. On the component front, hardware investments encompass base stations, transport equipment, and edge nodes, while software platforms cover orchestration, analytics, and security toolsets. The service dimension extends from strategic consulting engagements through multi-phase implementation projects to ongoing maintenance and support frameworks.

Examining slice types, enhanced mobile broadband slices continue to dominate initial rollouts, catering to high-throughput consumer and enterprise applications, whereas massive machine-type communication slices are gaining traction in large-scale IoT deployments. Ultra-reliable low-latency slices are particularly critical for mission-critical use cases in manufacturing and healthcare, where deterministic performance and end-to-end reliability are non-negotiable. From a slicing hierarchy perspective, horizontal slices offer broad segmentation across a network's entire topology, while vertical slicing isolates dedicated end-to-end instances for specific industry or enterprise use cases.

In terms of deployment models, non-standalone architectures are being leveraged by early adopters seeking to augment existing 4G networks, whereas standalone frameworks unlock full 5G service capabilities and native end-to-end management. Organization size also influences adoption strategies: large enterprises pursue full-scale rollouts backed by in-house expertise, while small and medium enterprises opt for managed slice subscriptions to control costs and reduce complexity. Finally, industry verticals such as automotive, healthcare, manufacturing, media and entertainment, public safety, telecom service providers, and transportation and logistics each impose unique performance, security, and integration requirements, driving tailored slice offerings that address specific use cases and regulatory constraints.

Revealing the Strategic Regional Dynamics Driving Network Slicing Adoption, Innovation, and Ecosystem Collaboration Across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific

Regional market dynamics exert considerable influence on the pace of network slicing adoption, the maturity of ecosystems, and the regulatory frameworks that govern deployment. In the Americas, service providers benefit from advanced 5G spectrum allocations and robust private network initiatives, accelerating investments in campus-wide slice deployments for manufacturing automation and smart logistics. Collaboration between federal agencies and telecommunications operators has enabled pilot programs in public safety and remote healthcare, underscoring the region's strategic emphasis on digital resilience.

Meanwhile, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa exhibit a tapestry of deployment scenarios, shaped by diverse regulatory environments and varying degrees of infrastructure readiness. In Western Europe, coordinated spectrum harmonization and cross-border testbeds have catalyzed pan-regional slicing use cases in transportation corridors and energy management. In the Middle East and Africa, investment in standalone 5G greenfield networks opens opportunities for leapfrog adoption of advanced slice orchestration and monetization models, supported by public-private partnerships and innovation hubs.

In Asia-Pacific, governments have embedded network slicing into national digital transformation agendas, providing incentives for ecosystem consortia that span operators, technology vendors, systems integrators, and academic research institutions. Rapid rollout schedules in countries with strong manufacturing and IoT sectors have created large-scale deployments of mMTC and URLLC slices, reinforcing the region's leadership in use case innovation. Overall, each region's regulatory clarity, spectrum policy, and ecosystem maturity shape tailored approaches to slice design, orchestration, and commercialization.

Analyzing Network Slicing Market Leaders Through Their Strategic Partnerships, Technology Roadmaps, Ecosystem Alliances, and Collaborative Ventures

Leading players in the network slicing market are deploying multifaceted strategies that combine organic innovation with targeted partnerships to maintain competitive differentiation. Global telecommunications equipment vendors are integrating cloud-native orchestration engines and AI-driven analytics into their core platforms, enabling operators to automate slice provisioning and performance optimization. Concurrently, software specialists are enhancing security frameworks with zero-trust architectures and embedded encryption to address stringent compliance requirements across enterprise verticals.

Strategic alliances between equipment providers and cloud hyperscalers have emerged as a key theme, delivering scalable slice management capabilities and enabling seamless integration with distributed edge computing infrastructures. These collaborations facilitate the establishment of virtualized network functions marketplaces, where operators and enterprises can deploy third-party functionalities on demand. In parallel, several companies have pursued acquisitions of specialty orchestration startups to reinforce portfolio breadth and accelerate time to market.

Service integrators and managed service firms are also carving out distinctive positions by offering turnkey solutions that encompass strategic consulting, custom slice design, end-to-end implementation, and proactive operations support. By embedding domain-specific expertise-from automotive safety systems to media streaming optimization-they are helping customers navigate complex regulatory landscapes and realize tangible return on investment. Collectively, these approaches underscore a concerted push toward ecosystem aggregation, with cross-industry consortia advancing interoperability standards and fostering co-innovation.

Empowering Industry Leaders with Actionable Strategies to Accelerate Network Slicing Adoption, Optimize Operations, and Strengthen Security Frameworks

To capitalize on the growing network slicing opportunity, industry leaders should prioritize a clear roadmap that aligns technology investments with strategic use cases. By adopting open application programming interfaces and modular architectures, they can accelerate integration with emerging ecosystem partners and reduce vendor lock-in. Embedding advanced analytics and automation at the orchestration layer will enable real-time monitoring of slice performance and proactive resource adjustments, driving service reliability and cost efficiency.

Securing end-to-end slice deployments requires a comprehensive security framework that integrates identity and access management, encryption, and continuous threat detection. Organizations should conduct rigorous security audits and adopt zero-trust principles to safeguard critical industrial and mission-critical communications. Investing in skill development and cross-functional teams will further ensure that operations and security functions collaborate effectively, reducing response times for anomaly detection and remediation.

Finally, fostering robust ecosystem engagement through joint innovation labs and pilot programs can accelerate time to market and validate business models. By co-developing proof-of-concepts with vertical end users-such as smart city authorities or healthcare consortiums-leaders can refine slice configurations to meet exacting performance criteria. In doing so, they lay the groundwork for scalable commercialization and sustained competitive advantage in an era where differentiated connectivity services drive digital transformation.

Detailing the Rigorous Multi-Phase Research Methodology Combining Primary Interviews, Expert Consultations, and Robust Validation Processes

This study is founded on a structured, multi-phase research methodology designed to ensure rigorous analysis and high-confidence insights. It began with a series of in-depth interviews with network slicing stakeholders, including telecommunications executives, enterprise IT leaders, and systems integrators, to capture firsthand perspectives on technological challenges, deployment priorities, and market drivers. These primary interviews provided qualitative depth and validated key hypotheses about adoption trends and strategic imperatives.

Next, insights from expert consultations with standards body representatives, regulatory authorities, and leading technology vendors were integrated to contextualize the competitive landscape and policy environment. These engagements helped calibrate the assessment of regulatory shifts, spectrum allocation strategies, and interoperability frameworks that shape slice deployments. Concurrently, extensive secondary research involving industry publications, white papers, and vendor documentation was conducted to compile quantitative data on technology roadmaps, vendor offerings, and ecosystem partnerships.

The final validation phase involved triangulating findings through cross-referencing multiple sources and conducting follow-up interviews to resolve discrepancies. Data synthesis techniques were applied to ensure consistency in thematic interpretation and trend forecasting. This iterative process of primary, secondary, and validation activities resulted in a cohesive narrative that balances strategic insights with operational practicality.

Summarizing Key Strategic Takeaways and Forward-Looking Perspectives to Guide Stakeholders Through the Next Wave of Network Slicing Innovation and Adoption

The evolution of network slicing from a theoretical concept to a cornerstone of next-generation connectivity underscores its transformative impact across industries. Key strategic learnings include the critical role of virtualization and cloud-native orchestration in enabling dynamic slice creation, the importance of regulatory and tariff considerations in global deployment planning, and the need for robust security frameworks to safeguard mission-critical applications.

Segmentation analysis highlights that software and services are driving new value streams, while specialized slices for eMBB, mMTC, and URLLC use cases unlock targeted revenue opportunities. Regional insights reveal differentiated deployment strategies in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific, each shaped by unique policy landscapes, ecosystem maturity, and industry priorities. Concurrently, leading vendors are leveraging partnerships and acquisitions to expand orchestration capabilities and deliver turnkey solutions that simplify adoption.

Looking forward, organizations must embrace open architectures, embed automation and analytics into slice management, and cultivate ecosystem alliances to maintain competitive advantage. By aligning strategic roadmaps with use-case validation and operational readiness, stakeholders can realize the full promise of network slicing, driving resilient, agile, and secure connectivity for the digital era.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Integration of edge computing platforms with network slicing enables ultra-low latency services for industrial automation use cases
  • 5.2. Development of flexible monetization models including usage-based billing for network slicing services in 5G ecosystems
  • 5.3. Telecom operators deploy AI-driven orchestration to dynamically manage 5G network slices across heterogeneous infrastructures
  • 5.4. Network slicing security enhancements focus on zero trust frameworks to safeguard multi-tenant 5G environments
  • 5.5. Emergence of slice-as-a-service offerings simplifies on-demand enterprise access to customized network slices
  • 5.6. Global standardization efforts accelerate interoperability among network slicing solutions from diverse vendors
  • 5.7. Strategic partnerships between telecom carriers and hyperscalers drive cloud-native network slicing deployments
  • 5.8. Growing deployment of private 5G network slicing in manufacturing and logistics to optimize operational efficiency
  • 5.9. Adoption of AI-driven predictive analytics for proactive network slice scaling and fault management in real time
  • 5.10. Focus on energy-efficient network slicing solutions to reduce power consumption in 5G infrastructure deployments

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Network Slicing Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Hardware
  • 8.3. Services
    • 8.3.1. Consulting
    • 8.3.2. Implementation
    • 8.3.3. Support & Maintenance
  • 8.4. Software

9. Network Slicing Market, by Slice Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. eMBB
  • 9.3. mMTC
  • 9.4. URLLC

10. Network Slicing Market, by Level Of Slicing

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Horizontal
  • 10.3. Vertical

11. Network Slicing Market, by Deployment Model

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Non-Standalone
  • 11.3. Standalone

12. Network Slicing Market, by Organization Size

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Large Enterprises
  • 12.3. Small & Medium Enterprises

13. Network Slicing Market, by End User Vertical

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Automotive
  • 13.3. Healthcare
  • 13.4. Manufacturing
  • 13.5. Media & Entertainment
  • 13.6. Public Safety
  • 13.7. Telecom Service Providers
  • 13.8. Transportation & Logistics

14. Americas Network Slicing Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. United States
  • 14.3. Canada
  • 14.4. Mexico
  • 14.5. Brazil
  • 14.6. Argentina

15. Europe, Middle East & Africa Network Slicing Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. United Kingdom
  • 15.3. Germany
  • 15.4. France
  • 15.5. Russia
  • 15.6. Italy
  • 15.7. Spain
  • 15.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 15.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 15.10. South Africa
  • 15.11. Denmark
  • 15.12. Netherlands
  • 15.13. Qatar
  • 15.14. Finland
  • 15.15. Sweden
  • 15.16. Nigeria
  • 15.17. Egypt
  • 15.18. Turkey
  • 15.19. Israel
  • 15.20. Norway
  • 15.21. Poland
  • 15.22. Switzerland

16. Asia-Pacific Network Slicing Market

  • 16.1. Introduction
  • 16.2. China
  • 16.3. India
  • 16.4. Japan
  • 16.5. Australia
  • 16.6. South Korea
  • 16.7. Indonesia
  • 16.8. Thailand
  • 16.9. Philippines
  • 16.10. Malaysia
  • 16.11. Singapore
  • 16.12. Vietnam
  • 16.13. Taiwan

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 17.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 17.3.1. Affirmed Networks Inc.
    • 17.3.2. Amdocs, Inc.
    • 17.3.3. Broadcom, Inc.
    • 17.3.4. BT Group PLC
    • 17.3.5. Ciena Corporation
    • 17.3.6. Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • 17.3.7. Druid Software Limited
    • 17.3.8. Firecell
    • 17.3.9. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.10. Intel Corporation
    • 17.3.11. Juniper Networks, Inc.
    • 17.3.12. Mavenir Systems, Inc.
    • 17.3.13. Nanjing ZTE Software Co. Ltd.
    • 17.3.14. NEC Corporation
    • 17.3.15. Niral Networks Pvt. Ltd.
    • 17.3.16. Nokia Corporation
    • 17.3.17. Parallel Wireless, Inc.
    • 17.3.18. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
    • 17.3.19. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.20. SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.21. SliceFinity Limited
    • 17.3.22. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
    • 17.3.23. Tambora Systems Ltd.
    • 17.3.24. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
    • 17.3.25. VMware, Inc.

18. ResearchAI

19. ResearchStatistics

20. ResearchContacts

21. ResearchArticles

22. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦