½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1808535

°Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : Â÷·®¡¤¼³ºñ À¯Çüº°, ÀÚµ¿È­ ·¹º§º°, ¿îÀü ¸ðµåº°, Ãâ·Âº°, À¯Åë ä³Îº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°, ¿ëµµº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Heavy Construction Equipment Market by Vehicle/Equipment Type, Automation Level, Operating Mode, Power Output, Distribution Channel, End-User, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 189 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

°Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀåÀÇ 2024³â ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 2,090¾ï ´Þ·¯·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. 2025³â¿¡´Â 2,225¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ À̸£°í, CAGRÀº 6.76%, 2030³â¿¡´Â 3,096¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ ¿¬µµ : 2024³â 2,090¾ï ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤ ¿¬µµ : 2025³â 2,225¾ï ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø ¿¬µµ : 2030³â 3,096¾ï 3,000¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 6.76%

½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, °úÁ¦, ¼ºÀå Ã˸ÅÁ¦¸¦ ÅëÇÑ °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ »ê¾÷ÀÇ Àü·«Àû ¸Æ¶ô È®¸³

ÁßÀåºñ °Ç¼³±â°è´Â Åä»ç, ÀÚÀç ¹× ÀåºñÀÇ À̵¿À» ºñ±³ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â È¿À²¼º°ú ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ¸·Î °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ¿© Çö´ëÀÇ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î µµ½ÃÈ­°¡ ÁøÇàµÇ°í °¢±¹ Á¤ºÎ°¡ °æ±â ºÎ¾çÃ¥°ú Àå±â °³¹ß °èȹÀ» ÅëÇØ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó Ȱ¼ºÈ­¿¡ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ µÎ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÁöÇü¿¡¼­ ÀÛµ¿ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °ß°íÇÑ ±â°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ ±ÞÁõÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ 1Â÷ »ê¹° °¡°Ý º¯µ¿°ú °ø±Þ¸Á È¥¶õ°ú °°Àº °Å½Ã°æÁ¦Àû ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ºñ¿ë º¯µ¿ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿© ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº Á¶´Þ Àü·«°ú ¶óÀÌÇÁ»çÀÌŬ °ü¸® ¹æ½ÄÀ» Àç°ËÅäÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â »óȲ¿¡ Ã³ÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ »ýŰ踦 ÀçÁ¤ÀÇÇÏ°í ¿î¿µÀÇ ¹Îø¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ´Â ±â¼ú, ±ÔÁ¦, ºñÁî´Ï½º ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ´ëÀüȯÀ» ¼±¾ðÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Áö³­ 10³â°£ °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ »ê¾÷Àº ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ±ÔÁ¦ °³ÀÔ, »ó¾÷ ¸ðµ¨ Àüȯ µî ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ¼ö·ÅµÈ Èû¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Å« ÁøÈ­¸¦ ÀÌ·ç¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ±â¼úÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ÀÚÀ² ±â°è, ¿¹Ãø ºÐ¼®, ÅëÇÕ ÅÚ·¹¸Åƽ½ºÀÇ µîÀåÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº Àü·Ê ¾ø´Â ¼öÁØÀÇ Á¤È®¼º°ú ½Å·Ú¼ºÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ½Ç½Ã°£ ¼¾¼­¿Í ÷´Ü Á¦¾î ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» °®Ãá Àåºñ´Â ÀáÀçÀûÀÎ °íÀåÀ» ½º½º·Î Áø´ÜÇϰí ÀÛµ¿ ¸Å°³º¯¼ö¸¦ µ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¶Á¤ÇÏ¿© ¼º´ÉÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, µðÁöÅÐ Æ®À© ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±â°èÀÇ °¡»ó º¹Á¦º»À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸¶¸ð¿Í ¼Õ»óÀ» ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ºñ¿ëÀÌ ¸¹ÀÌ µå´Â ¹°¸®Àû Å×½ºÆ®ÀÇ Çʿ伺À» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÃÖ±Ù °ü¼¼ Á¤Ã¥ÀÌ ¼¼°è ÁßÀåºñ °ø±Þ¸Á°ú ºñ¿ë ±¸Á¶¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ´ÙÃþÀû ÆÄ±ÞÈ¿°ú ºÐ¼®.

2025³â ÀÌÈÄ ¹Ì±¹ÀÌ ÁÖ¿ä ÅõÀÔÀç ¹× ¿ÏÁ¦Ç° ¼öÀÔ¿¡ ºÎ°úÇÑ »õ·Î¿î °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡´Â ¼¼°è ÁßÀåºñ °ø±Þ¸Á¿¡ Å« º¹À⼺À» °¡Á®¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù. ö°­, ¾Ë·ç¹Ì´½ ¹× ƯÁ¤ ºÎǰ Ä«Å×°í¸®¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¶Ä¡´Â ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ¹«¿ª ¸¶ÂûÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÏ°í ±¹³» »ý»êÀ» Àå·ÁÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ °á°ú·Î Á¦Á¶¾÷üµéÀº »ý»ê ºñ¿ë »ó½ÂÀ» ÃÊ·¡ÇÏ¿© Á¶´Þ Àü·«À» Àç°ËÅäÇϰųª ÀÚÀ¯¹«¿ªÇùÁ¤ÀÌ Ã¼°áµÈ Áö¿ªÀÇ ´ëü °ø±Þó¸¦ °³Ã´ÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´Â »óȲ¿¡ Ã³ÇØ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Àåºñ À¯Çü, ÀÚµ¿È­ ¼öÁØ, ÆÄ¿öÆ®·¹ÀÎ, ä³Î, ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ, ¿ëµµº° µîÀÇ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ ¿ªÇÐ ÆÄ¾Ç

ÁßÀåºñ °Ç¼³±â°è ½ÃÀåÀÇ º»ÁúÀûÀÎ Ãø¸éÀº °Ç¼³ Â÷·®, Åä¸ñ ±â°è, ÀÚÀç ¿î¹Ý Ç÷§Æû µî Â÷·® ¹× Àåºñ À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ ´Ù°¢ÀûÀÎ ºÐ·ù¿¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °Ç¼³ Â÷·® ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­´Â ½Ã¸àÆ® ¹Í¼­, ´ýÇÁÆ®·°, ƼÆÛ¿Í °°Àº Ư¼ö À¯´ÖÀÌ ÄÜÅ©¸®Æ® ó¸®, ¹úÅ© ÀÚÀç ¿î¹Ý, Á¤¹ÐÇÑ ÇöÀå Á¤¸® ÀÛ¾÷ µîÀ» À§ÇØ Á¶Á¤µÈ ±â´ÉÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, Åä¸ñ ±â°è¿¡´Â ´ë±Ô¸ð Åä»ç ±¼Âø ¹× Áö¹Ý °³·®À» ÃËÁøÇÏ´Â °ß°íÇÑ ºÒµµÀú, À¯¾Ð ±¼»è±â, ´Ù¸ñÀû ·Î´õ, Á¤¹Ð ¸ðÅÍ ±×·¹ÀÌ´õ, ½ºÅ°µå ½ºÆ¼¾î ·Î´õ°¡ Æ÷ÇԵ˴ϴÙ. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿ª·®À» º¸¿ÏÇÏ´Â ÀÚÀç°ü¸® Ç÷§ÆûÀº ÅÚ·¹Çڵ鷯¿Í Áö°ÔÂ÷, Å©·Ñ·¯ Å©·¹ÀÎ, À̵¿½Ä Å©·¹ÀÎ, Ÿ¿ö Å©·¹ÀÎ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ³ôÀÌ, ¹üÀ§, ÁöÇü ¿ä°ÇÀ» ÃæÁ·ÇÏ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ Å©·¹ÀÎ ±¸¼º¿¡ À̸£±â±îÁö ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ¸®ÇÁÆÃ ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀ» Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Ä¿¹öÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

ºÏ¹Ì, À¯·´, Áßµ¿/¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç °Ç¼³±â°è ½ÃÀåÀÇ Áö¿ªº° Â÷ÀÌ¿Í ¼ö¿ä ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ ºÐ¼®

ºÏ¹Ì¿Í ³²¹Ì¿¡¼­´Â ³ëÈÄÈ­µÈ ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¿Í »õ·Î¿î °ø°ø ÅõÀÚ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ °áÇÕÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ÁßÀåºñ ÇÔ´ë °£ÀÇ ´ë´ëÀûÀÎ ±³Ã¼ ÁֱⰡ °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °í¼Óµµ·Î Çö´ëÈ­, ±³·® º¹±¸, µµ½Ã ±³Åë È®ÀåÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÏ´Â ¿¬¹æ ¹× ÁÖÁ¤ºÎÀÇ ÀÌ´Ï¼ÅÆ¼ºêÀ¸·Î ´Ù¸ñÀû Åä¸ñ ¹× ¸®ÇÁÆÃ ±â°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ºÏ¹ÌÀÇ ¼ÎÀϰ¡½º ºÕÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Ư¼ö ¿ÀÇÁ·Îµå Â÷·®°ú ¿¡³ÊÁö ºÎ¹®ÀÇ ¿ëµµ¿¡ ¸Â´Â °í¸¶·Â ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æ´»õ ¿ä±¸»çÇ×ÀÌ »ý°Ü³µ½À´Ï´Ù. ·»Å» ¾÷ü´Â À¯¿¬ÇÑ ÀÚ±Ý Á¶´Þ ±¸Á¶¿Í µðÁöÅÐ ÀÚ»ê °ü¸® Ç÷§ÆûÀ» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® ÀÏÁ¤¿¡ ¸ÂÃß¾î Àåºñ °¡¿ë¼ºÀ» Á¶Á¤ÇÏ´Â ¹Ý¸é, ºñ»óÀå ¾÷ü´Â º¯È­¹«½ÖÇÑ ÇöÀå Á¶°Ç¿¡ ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¸ðµâ½Ä ±â°è ±¸¼º¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¼¼°è ÁÖ¿ä °ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀÇ °æÀï Àü·«°ú ÆÄÆ®³Ê½Ê ¸ðµ¨À» ÅëÇØ ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀåÀÇ ¹æÇ⼺À» ÆÄ¾ÇÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°æÀïÀûÀÎ ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ÁÖ¿ä Á¦Á¶¾÷ü¿Í °ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀº ½ÃÀå ÀÔÁö¸¦ °­È­Çϰí, ±â¼ú Çõ½ÅÀ» ÃßÁøÇϸç, ¼­ºñ½º ±â¹ÝÀ» È®´ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ ´Ù°¢ÀûÀÎ Àü·«À» äÅÃÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, ºÏ¹ÌÀÇ ÇÑ ´ëÇü OEMÀº ÃÖ±Ù ÅÚ·¹¸Åƽ½º, Áõ°­Çö½Ç ±â¹Ý ¼­ºñ½º Áö¿ø, Àüü ¼ö¸íÁֱ⠵¿¾È ±â°èÀÇ ¼º´ÉÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ´Â ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ ¹«¼± ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¾÷±×·¹À̵带 °áÇÕÇÑ ÅëÇÕ µðÁöÅÐ Ç÷§ÆûÀ» ¹ßÇ¥Çß½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ À¯·´ÀÇ ÇÑ °ø±Þ¾÷ü´Â ¿¡³ÊÁö ÀúÀå °ø±Þ¾÷ü¿Í Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ¸¦ ¸Î°í ¹èÅ͸® ±¸µ¿ ±¼»è±â¿Í ·Î´õ¸¦ °øµ¿ °³¹ßÇÏ¿© Á¦Ç° ·Îµå¸ÊÀ» °­È­µÈ ¹èÃâ ±ÔÁ¦¿Í Àü·Â¸Á ¿ë·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °í·Á¿Í ÀÏÄ¡½ÃÄ×½À´Ï´Ù.

ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â Àåºñ ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ¼º°øÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¿î¿µ, À繫, ±â¼úÀû Çʼö »çÇ×À» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÇÑ ¼±°ßÁö¸íÀûÀΠû»çÁøÀ» ÀÛ¼ºÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¾÷°è°¡ ÀÚµ¿È­¿Í Áö¼Ó °¡´ÉÇÑ ¿î¿µÀ¸·Î ÀüȯÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ¾÷°è Âü°¡ÀÚµéÀº ÇâÈÄ 10³â µ¿¾È ȸº¹·Â°ú °æÀï·ÂÀ» À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ Àü·«Àû ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§¸¦ ÀçÁ¶Á¤ÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¹«¾ùº¸´Ùµµ ÅëÇÕµÈ µðÁöÅÐ Æ®À© ±â¼ú°ú ÷´Ü ÅÚ·¹¸Åƽ½º Ç÷§Æû¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ÅëÇØ ½Ç½Ã°£ ¼º´É ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µ°ú ¿¹Áöº¸ÀüÀ» ÅëÇØ °èȹµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ´Ù¿îŸÀÓÀ» ÁÙÀ̰í ÀÚ»êÀÇ °¡µ¿·üÀ» ³ôÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿î¿µ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ºÐ¼®¿¡ ¸Ó½Å·¯´× ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀ» µµÀÔÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±â¾÷Àº »ç¿ë Ãß¼¼¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇϰí, ºÎǰÀÇ ½ºÆ®·¹½º Æ÷ÀÎÆ®¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϰí, À¯Áöº¸¼ö Áֱ⸦ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ »ê¾÷ ºÐ¼®À» µÞ¹ÞħÇÏ´Â ¾ö°ÝÇÏ°í ´Ù´Ü°èÀûÀÎ Á¶»ç ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¿Í Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ ±âµÕÀ» ¹àÈü´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¸°í¼­ÀÇ ÅëÂû·ÂÀº Á¾ÇÕÀûÀ̰í Á¤È®ÇÏ¸ç ½Ç¿ëÀûÀÎ ºÐ¼®À» º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇØ 1Â÷ Á¤º¸¿Í ÀÌÂ÷ Á¤º¸¸¦ ¸ðµÎ ÅëÇÕÇÑ ±¸Á¶È­µÈ Á¶»ç ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¾òÀº °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Á¶»ç´Â 20°³ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¾÷°è °£Ç๰, ±â¼ú ¹é¼­, Á¤ºÎ ±ÔÁ¦ °³¿ä, Àåºñ Á¦Á¶¾÷üÀÇ ÀÚü Á¤º¸ °ø°³¿¡ À̸£´Â ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ 2Â÷ ¹®Çå Á¶»ç·Î ½ÃÀ۵Ǿú½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÌÂ÷Àû ÀÎDzÀ» ÅëÇØ ½ÃÀå ÁÖÁ¦, Á¤Ã¥ ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÃÊÀûÀÎ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇß½À´Ï´Ù.

»ê¾÷ÀÇ ÁøÈ­, ÃÖ÷´Ü ±â¼ú Çõ½Å, ÁßÀåºñ ¿î¿µÀÇ ¹Ì·¡¸¦ º¸ÀåÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Àü·«Àû Çʼö ¿ä¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ÅëÂû·Â ÅëÇÕ

ÀÌ ¿ä¾à¿¡¼­ µµÃâµÈ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇϸé, °¡¼ÓÈ­µÇ´Â ±â¼ú µµÀÔ, ÁøÈ­ÇÏ´Â ±ÔÁ¦ ÇÁ·¹ÀÓ¿öÅ©, ±×¸®°í ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀÎ °í°´ ¿ä±¸·Î Á¤ÀǵǴ Áß¿äÇÑ º¯°îÁ¡¿¡ ³õÀÎ ºÐ¾ß¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÚÀ² ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú ´ëü ¿¡³ÊÁö Ç÷§ÆûÀº ÆÄÀÏ·µ ´Ü°è¿¡¼­ ÇöÀå ¹èÄ¡·Î ÀüȯÇϸ鼭 Àåºñ ¼³°è, Á¦¾î ¾ÆÅ°ÅØÃ³, À¯Áöº¸¼ö ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ» À籸¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡ »õ·Î¿î °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡·Î ÀÎÇØ ź·ÂÀûÀÎ °ø±Þ¸Á°ú ´Ù¾çÇÑ Á¶´Þ Àü·«ÀÇ Á߿伺ÀÌ ºÎ°¢µÇ¸é¼­ Á¦Á¶¾÷ü¿Í ÃÖÁ¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ´Â ¿î¿µÀÇ ¹Îø¼º°ú ºñ¿ë ÃÖÀûÈ­¸¦ Ãß±¸ÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : Â÷·®/±â±â À¯Çüº°

  • °Ç¼³ Â÷·®
    • ½Ã¸àÆ® ¹Í¼­
    • ´ýÇÁ Æ®·°
    • ƼÆÛ
  • Åä¸ñ ±â°è
    • ºÒµµÀú
    • ±¼»è±â
    • ·Î´õ
    • ¸ðÅÍ ±×·¹ÀÌ´õ
    • ½ºÅ°µå ½ºÆ¼¾î ·Î´õ
  • ÀÚÀç°ü¸® ±â±â
    • Å©·¹ÀÎ
      • Å©·Ñ·¯ Å©·¹ÀÎ
      • À̵¿½Ä Å©·¹ÀÎ
      • Ÿ¿ö Å©·¹ÀÎ
    • Áö°ÔÂ÷
    • ÅÚ·¹½ºÄÚÇÈ Çڵ鷯

Á¦9Àå °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : ÀÚµ¿È­ ·¹º§º°

  • ¿ÏÀü ÀÚµ¿
  • ¼öµ¿
  • ¹ÝÀÚµ¿

Á¦10Àå °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : µ¿ÀÛ ¸ðµåº°

  • CNG/LPG ±â¹Ý
  • µðÁ© ±¸µ¿
  • Àü±â
  • °¡¼Ö¸° ±¸µ¿
  • ¼ö¼Ò ¿¬·áÀüÁö

Á¦11Àå °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : Ãâ·Âº°

  • 101-200¸¶·Â
  • 201-400¸¶·Â
  • 100¸¶·Â ¹Ì¸¸
  • 400¸¶·Â ÀÌ»ó

Á¦12Àå °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : À¯Åë ä³Îº°

  • ¿ÀÇÁ¶óÀÎ ÆÇ¸Å
  • ¿Â¶óÀÎ ÆÇ¸Å

Á¦13Àå °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • Á¤ºÎ±â°ü
  • ¹Î°£ °è¾à¾÷ü
  • ·»Å» ȸ»ç

Á¦14Àå °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • ÀÓ¾÷ ¹× ³ó¾÷
  • »ê¾÷ °Ç¼³
  • ÀÎÇÁ¶ó
    • °øÇ×
    • ´Ù¸®
    • ´ï
    • öµµ
    • µµ·Î ¹× °í¼Óµµ·Î
  • ±¤¾÷
  • ¼®À¯ ¹× °¡½º
  • ÁÖÅà °Ç¼³
  • À¯Æ¿¸®Æ¼

Á¦15Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦16Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®(UAE)
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦17Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ °Ç¼³ÁßÀåºñ ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦18Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Astec Industries, Inc.
    • Bauer Group
    • Bell Equipment Ltd.
    • Caterpillar Inc.
    • CNH Industrial N.V.
    • Deutz AG
    • Doosan Bobcat Inc.
    • Fayat Group
    • Hidromek Co. Ltd.
    • Hitachi, Ltd.
    • Hyundai Construction Equipment Co., Ltd.
    • J.C. Bamford Excavators Limited
    • JLG Industries, Inc.
    • John Deere GmbH & Co. KG
    • Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
    • Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
    • Komatsu America Corp.
    • Liebherr Group
    • Manitowoc Company, Inc.
    • SANY Group
    • Tadano Ltd.
    • Terex Corporation
    • Volvo Group
    • Wacker Neuson SE
    • XCMG Group
    • Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦20Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦21Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃÆ®

Á¦22Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦23Àå ºÎ·Ï

LSH

The Heavy Construction Equipment Market was valued at USD 209.00 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 222.50 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.76%, reaching USD 309.63 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 209.00 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 222.50 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 309.63 billion
CAGR (%) 6.76%

Establishing the Strategic Context of the Heavy Construction Equipment Industry Through Market Drivers, Challenges, and Growth Catalysts

Heavy construction equipment plays a pivotal role in shaping modern infrastructure projects, enabling the movement of earth, materials, and equipment with unparalleled efficiency and reliability. As global urbanization intensifies and governments prioritize infrastructure revitalization through stimulus packages and long-term development plans, demand for robust machinery capable of operating in diverse terrains has surged. Simultaneously, macroeconomic factors such as commodity price fluctuations and supply chain disruptions have introduced cost volatility, compelling stakeholders to reassess procurement strategies and lifecycle management practices.

In parallel, stringent emissions regulations and rising fuel costs are forcing original equipment manufacturers and fleet operators to innovate powertrain technologies and seek alternative operating modes. In response to these pressures, major players are investing in electrification, hydrogen fuel cell research, and semi-autonomous functionalities to balance performance with sustainability goals. These technological advancements are complemented by a growing emphasis on circular economy principles, where remanufacturing and component recycling initiatives reduce environmental impact and extend asset longevity.

Moreover, digital transformation initiatives are redefining equipment lifecycle management. Embedded telematics, predictive maintenance algorithms, and cloud-based asset tracking solutions are enabling stakeholders to optimize uptime, reduce operational expenditure, and unlock data-driven insights. Ultimately, the heavy equipment sector serves as a bellwether for broader economic cycles, with production levels closely correlated to global GDP growth and infrastructure spending patterns. As these converging forces of regulatory pressures, technological advancements, and shifting end-user expectations reshape the competitive landscape, industry participants must navigate a complex matrix of challenges and opportunities. Consequently, this executive summary delineates the pivotal inflection points shaping the sector's trajectory and outlines strategic imperatives for sustained growth.

Unveiling Major Technological, Regulatory, and Business Model Transformations Redefining the Heavy Construction Equipment Ecosystem to Enhance Operational Agility

Over the past decade, the heavy construction equipment industry has undergone a profound evolution driven by multiple converging forces that span technological breakthroughs, regulatory interventions, and shifting commercial models. On the technological front, the advent of autonomous machinery, predictive analytics, and integrated telematics has empowered stakeholders to achieve unprecedented levels of precision and reliability. Equipment equipped with real-time sensors and advanced control systems now self-diagnose potential faults and dynamically adjust operational parameters to optimize performance. Furthermore, digital twin frameworks are enabling virtual replicas of machines to simulate wear and tear, reducing the need for costly physical trials.

Concurrently, regulatory pressures are intensifying as governments worldwide introduce stricter emission thresholds and enforce environmental compliance standards. Emissions targets are reshaping equipment design, leading manufacturers to develop alternative powertrain platforms including electrified drive systems, hybrid configurations, and hydrogen fuel cell architectures. This shift not only aligns with global decarbonization objectives but also offers potential cost savings through reduced fuel consumption.

Moreover, evolving customer preferences are redefining traditional ownership paradigms. Service-based models and equipment-as-a-service arrangements have gained traction among private contractors and rental companies seeking flexibility and lower capital expenditure. By integrating digital marketplaces and subscription plans, service providers can offer usage-based billing, remote diagnostics, and on-demand maintenance services. Furthermore, circular supply chain models incorporating material traceability and component refurbishment are emerging, reducing waste and unlocking cost efficiencies across the equipment lifecycle. Additionally, the emphasis on workforce upskilling has accelerated, as operators require training in advanced control interfaces and machine learning-driven decision support tools. Taken together, these transformative shifts underscore the industry's journey toward an agile, sustainable, and data-driven future.

Analyzing the Multilayered Ripple Effects of Recent United States Tariff Policies on Global Heavy Construction Equipment Supply Chains and Cost Structures

Beginning in 2025, a new tranche of tariffs imposed by the United States on key input materials and finished equipment imports has introduced significant complexity into global heavy equipment supply chains. These measures, targeting steel, aluminum, and specific component categories, reflect broader trade tensions and aim to incentivize domestic production. However, the immediate consequence has been an escalation in production costs for manufacturers, compelling them to reassess sourcing strategies and explore alternative suppliers in regions bound by free-trade agreements.

Simultaneously, surcharges on major equipment importers have triggered delays in inbound shipments, complicating inventory planning and assembly schedules at critical manufacturing facilities. To mitigate these disruptions, leading original equipment manufacturers are diversifying their supplier networks by establishing satellite production hubs in nearshore markets with more favorable tariff frameworks. This strategic pivot not only reduces exposure to punitive duties but also enables faster response times to fluctuating domestic demand.

Moreover, secondary effects are emerging in supply chain financing, as banks and credit insurers adjust terms in light of shifting trade policies and increased risk profiles. Equipment lessors are recalibrating lease structures to provide flexible payment schedules and inflation-linked clauses. End users, facing higher acquisition and operating costs, are extending equipment replacement cycles and increasing reliance on rental agreements bundled with comprehensive maintenance services. Longer-term negotiations and potential renegotiation phases may offer relief avenues, but near-term adjustments will require agile strategies to preserve profitability and supply chain continuity. Looking ahead, sustained dialogue between policymakers and industry stakeholders will be crucial in harmonizing trade policies with broader infrastructure and economic growth objectives while ensuring supply chain resilience.

Decoding Comprehensive Segmentation Dynamics Spanning Equipment Types, Automation Levels, Power Trains, Channels, End Users, and Application Verticals

An essential dimension of the heavy construction equipment market lies in the multifaceted classification based on vehicle and equipment type, which encompasses construction vehicles, earthmoving machinery, and material handling platforms. Within the realm of construction vehicles, specialized units such as cement mixers, dump trucks, and tippers deliver tailored functionality for concrete processing, bulk material transport, and precise site grading tasks. Meanwhile, earthmoving machinery includes robust bulldozers, hydraulic excavators, versatile loaders, precision motor graders, and skid-steer loaders that facilitate large-scale earth excavation and groundwork. Complementing these capabilities, material handling platforms cover a spectrum of lifting solutions from telehandlers and forklifts to an array of crane configurations, with crawler cranes, mobile cranes, and tower cranes addressing diverse height, outreach, and terrain requirements.

Beyond physical classifications, the sector is delineated by automation levels, ranging from manual operation and semi-automated assistance to fully autonomous systems that leverage advanced robotics and machine learning for self-guided site activities. This intersection of human oversight and algorithmic control underpins the progressive shift toward intelligent worksites that can adapt to evolving project complexities.

Further stratification occurs along the lines of operating mode and power output, where traditional diesel-operated platforms stand alongside CNG/LPG-powered, electric, gasoline-operated, and emerging hydrogen fuel cell units, each optimized for specific performance profiles and environmental objectives. Equipment power ratings span from sub-100 horsepower applications to midrange classes of 101-200 HP and 201-400 HP, extending beyond 400 horsepower for heavyweight tasks such as large-scale mining and energy infrastructure projects.

Distribution channels also play a pivotal role, with offline dealerships exerting influence through localized service networks, while online sales portals offer streamlined procurement and remote configuration capabilities. From a utilization standpoint, government entities, private contractors, and rental companies each drive procurement strategies tailored to specialized demands across forestry and agriculture, industrial construction, major infrastructure projects including airports, bridges, dams, railways, roads and highways, as well as mining, oil and gas, residential construction, and utilities. The interplay between these segmentation axes reveals critical growth levers and highlights synergy opportunities for manufacturers and service providers alike.

Unearthing Regional Nuances and Demand Drivers Across the Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific Construction Equipment Landscapes

Across the Americas, a blend of aging infrastructure and renewed public investment programs has spurred significant displacement cycles among heavy equipment fleets. Federal and state initiatives targeting highway modernization, bridge rehabilitation, and urban transit expansions have elevated demand for versatile earthmoving and lifting machinery. Additionally, the North American shale gas boom has created niche requirements for specialized off-road vehicles and high-horsepower models tailored to energy sector applications. Rental companies leverage flexible financing structures and digital asset management platforms to align equipment availability with project schedules, while private contractors emphasize modular machinery configurations to address variable site conditions.

Moving to Europe, Middle East, and Africa, market dynamics exhibit pronounced heterogeneity driven by regulatory frameworks, economic diversification efforts, and currency fluctuations. In Western Europe, stringent emission regulations and carbon pricing mechanisms have accelerated the uptake of low-emission and electric machines, supported by government incentives and public procurement mandates. Concurrently, Gulf Cooperation Council nations continue their investment sprees in oil, gas, and infrastructure megaprojects, sustaining demand for heavy-duty drilling supports, crawler cranes, and mining equipment. Across Africa, the focus on closing infrastructural gaps in transport corridors and power generation is driving interest in modular, easily deployable machinery solutions that balance performance with cost efficiency, notwithstanding challenges in financing and logistics.

Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is characterized by rapid urbanization, extensive railway and port expansions, and strategic infrastructure corridors under public initiatives. Emerging economies throughout Southeast Asia and India are prioritizing road networks, airports, and logistics hub development, catalyzing procurement of high-capacity loaders, graders, and specialized lifting equipment. Established markets in Japan and Australia maintain stable investment in mining and resource extraction, fostering demand for high-horsepower diesel-operated platforms, integrated fleet telematics, and adaptive maintenance services. In all regions, the convergence of digital technologies and innovative financing schemes, such as green bonds and infrastructure funds, is shaping capital allocation and equipment procurement decisions.

Deciphering Competitive Strategies and Partnership Models of Leading Global Suppliers to Illuminate the Direction of the Heavy Construction Equipment Market

In the competitive arena of heavy construction equipment, leading manufacturers and suppliers have adopted multifaceted strategies to consolidate market presence, drive technological innovation, and expand service footprints. A prominent North American OEM, for example, recently unveiled an integrated digital platform combining telematics, augmented reality-based service support, and a suite of over-the-air software upgrades that optimize machine performance throughout the lifecycle. Simultaneously, a European supplier forged strategic alliances with energy storage providers to co-develop battery-powered excavators and loaders, aligning its product roadmap with tightening emission regulations and grid capacity considerations.

Moreover, North-South partnerships are reshaping the global competitive landscape as select entities pursue joint ventures to accelerate localized manufacturing. One global giant entered a collaboration with a regional manufacturer in Southeast Asia, leveraging low-cost production capabilities to supply targeted markets with tailored hydraulic cranes and telescopic handlers. Similarly, an Asia-based OEM has invested in European R&D centers to assimilate advanced engineering practices and achieve faster time to market for autonomous field solutions.

Targeted acquisitions have further diversified product portfolios, enabling companies to bridge gaps in material handling or earthmoving segments. Meanwhile, aftermarket services remain a critical battleground, with top-tier players enhancing their dealer networks, digital spare parts catalogs, and remote diagnostic channels to ensure rapid parts delivery and technical assistance. By integrating usage-based warranty models and subscription-based service agreements, these companies secure recurring revenue streams and deepen customer engagement across diverse application verticals. Additionally, Environmental, Social, and Governance commitments are driving companies to disclose sustainability metrics and partner with nonprofit organizations to enhance community impact and compliance reporting.

Crafting A Forward-Thinking Blueprint with Targeted Operational, Financial, and Technological Imperatives to Thrive in the Evolving Equipment Landscape

As the sector continues its transition toward automation and sustainable operations, industry participants must realign strategic priorities to remain resilient and competitive in the coming decade. First and foremost, investment in integrated digital twin technologies and advanced telematics platforms will enable real-time performance monitoring and predictive maintenance, reducing unplanned downtime and enhancing asset utilization. Deploying machine-learning algorithms to analyze operational data allows firms to identify usage trends, forecast component stress points, and optimize maintenance intervals with precision.

Second, supply chain diversification is crucial to mitigate tariff-induced disruptions and raw material shortages. Building strategic relationships with alternative component suppliers in nearshore locations, forming volume-flex agreements, and establishing dual-source procurement mechanisms will improve supply continuity and cost stability. Additionally, firms should develop dynamic pricing models that incorporate raw material indexation to share cost fluctuations transparently with customers.

Third, embracing a multi-powertrain portfolio that includes electric drive systems and hydrogen fuel cell units alongside traditional diesel-operated platforms will position manufacturers to accommodate evolving emission standards and project requirements. Early investment in charging infrastructure, modular battery swapping solutions, and localized refueling networks will accelerate market acceptance and build customer confidence.

Furthermore, expanding aftermarket services through a digital maintenance network, usage-based service-level agreements, and remote assistance capabilities can create stable, recurring revenue streams. Bundled offerings that combine proactive diagnostics, operator training modules, and performance-based warranty programs will foster long-term customer partnerships and differentiate service propositions. Establishing pilot programs and setting clear KPIs for digital and alternative energy deployments will accelerate learning cycles and inform scalable rollouts. Finally, proactive regulatory engagement and robust workforce upskilling initiatives are essential to support the rollout of autonomous and alternative energy technologies. By collaborating with policymakers, vocational institutions, and industry consortia, firms can shape favorable regulatory frameworks and cultivate the specialized talent needed to operate sophisticated machinery.

Illuminating the Rigorous, Multi-Stage Research Framework and Methodological Pillars Underpinning the Comprehensive Industry Analysis

This report's insights derive from a structured research framework that integrates both primary and secondary sources to ensure comprehensive, accurate, and actionable analysis. The research commenced with an extensive secondary literature review spanning two dozen industry publications, technical white papers, governmental regulatory briefs, and proprietary equipment manufacturer disclosures. These secondary inputs established a foundational understanding of market themes, policy drivers, and emerging technological paradigms.

Building upon this groundwork, more than one hundred in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders across the value chain, including equipment OEM executives, product development engineers, component suppliers, fleet managers, and end users in private contracting and rental segments. These discussions provided firsthand perspectives on procurement criteria, operational challenges, and strategic roadmaps. All interviews followed a standardized questionnaire and were supplemented by practitioner workshops to facilitate a two-way exchange of insights.

Quantitative analysis involved the aggregation of shipment records, production volumes, and trade flow data from established public databases and industry associations. A rigorous triangulation methodology was employed to reconcile discrepancies across sources and validate key metrics. Segmentation analysis decomposed the market across equipment categories, automation levels, operating modes, power output classes, distribution channels, end-user verticals, and application sectors. Supply chain mapping techniques identified critical nodes and potential points of resilience under varied tariff scenarios. Advanced scenario modeling, including sensitivity checks and risk-adjusted forecasts, supported the assessment of trade policy impacts and technology adoption trajectories. Finally, all research outputs underwent peer review sessions with industry thought leaders to ensure methodological robustness and practical relevance.

Synthesizing Critical Insights on Industry Evolution, Cutting-Edge Innovations, and Strategic Imperatives for Future-Proofing Heavy Equipment Operations

Bringing together the findings of this executive summary reveals a sector at a critical inflection point defined by accelerating technological adoption, evolving regulatory frameworks, and dynamic customer requirements. Autonomous systems and alternative energy platforms have moved from pilot phases to field deployments, reshaping equipment design, control architectures, and maintenance paradigms. Concurrently, new tariff measures have underscored the importance of resilient supply chains and diversified sourcing strategies, prompting manufacturers and end users to pursue operational agility and cost optimization.

In-depth segmentation analysis highlights the nuanced interplay between vehicle types, powertrain options, and application contexts. Stakeholders deploying high-horsepower excavators in large-scale mining operations must consider not only machine performance but also fueling infrastructure and emissions compliance, while firms leveraging compact electric forklifts for urban logistics prioritize noise reduction and zero tailpipe emissions. Regional assessments further accentuate variability in market drivers, from robust infrastructure renewal in the Americas to sustainable urban initiatives in Western Europe, strategic oil and gas investment in the Middle East, and high-velocity corridor development across Asia Pacific.

Competitive landscapes are being reshaped by digital partnerships, strategic acquisitions, and expanded aftermarket services that drive recurring revenue streams and deepen customer relationships. Companies integrating advanced data analytics, modular service offerings, and multi-powertrain portfolios will be uniquely positioned to capture emerging growth pockets. Ultimately, sustained collaboration among equipment manufacturers, technology providers, policymakers, and research institutions will be essential to drive the heavy equipment ecosystem toward a more connected, efficient, and environmentally conscious future.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Integration of telematics and predictive maintenance analytics in heavy equipment
  • 5.2. Utilization of autonomous and semi-autonomous bulldozers for enhancing job site productivity
  • 5.3. Adoption of electric and hybrid powertrains in heavy earthmoving machinery to reduce emissions
  • 5.4. Implementation of augmented reality solutions for remote equipment diagnostics and operator training
  • 5.5. Growth of modular and mobile crushing and screening systems for flexible aggregate production
  • 5.6. Increasing demand for compact equipment with high power density in urban infrastructure projects
  • 5.7. Emergence of rental fleet management platforms optimizing equipment utilization and asset tracking

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Heavy Construction Equipment Market, by Vehicle/Equipment Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Construction Vehicles
    • 8.2.1. Cement Mixers
    • 8.2.2. Dump Trucks
    • 8.2.3. Tippers
  • 8.3. Earthmoving Equipment
    • 8.3.1. Bulldozers
    • 8.3.2. Excavators
    • 8.3.3. Loaders
    • 8.3.4. Motor Graders
    • 8.3.5. Skid-steer Loaders
  • 8.4. Material Handling Equipment
    • 8.4.1. Cranes
      • 8.4.1.1. Crawler Cranes
      • 8.4.1.2. Mobile Cranes
      • 8.4.1.3. Tower Cranes
    • 8.4.2. Forklifts
    • 8.4.3. Telescopic Handlers

9. Heavy Construction Equipment Market, by Automation Level

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Fully Automated
  • 9.3. Manual
  • 9.4. Semi-Automated

10. Heavy Construction Equipment Market, by Operating Mode

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. CNG/LPG-Based
  • 10.3. Diesel-Operated
  • 10.4. Electric
  • 10.5. Gasoline-Operated
  • 10.6. Hydrogen Fuel Cell

11. Heavy Construction Equipment Market, by Power Output

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. 101-200 HP
  • 11.3. 201-400 HP
  • 11.4. <100 HP
  • 11.5. >400 HP

12. Heavy Construction Equipment Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. Offline Sales
  • 12.3. Online Sales

13. Heavy Construction Equipment Market, by End-User

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. Government Entities
  • 13.3. Private Contractors
  • 13.4. Rental Companies

14. Heavy Construction Equipment Market, by Application

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. Forestry & Agriculture
  • 14.3. Industrial Construction
  • 14.4. Infrastructure
    • 14.4.1. Airports
    • 14.4.2. Bridges
    • 14.4.3. Dams
    • 14.4.4. Railways
    • 14.4.5. Roads & Highways
  • 14.5. Mining
  • 14.6. Oil & Gas
  • 14.7. Residential Construction
  • 14.8. Utilities

15. Americas Heavy Construction Equipment Market

  • 15.1. Introduction
  • 15.2. United States
  • 15.3. Canada
  • 15.4. Mexico
  • 15.5. Brazil
  • 15.6. Argentina

16. Europe, Middle East & Africa Heavy Construction Equipment Market

  • 16.1. Introduction
  • 16.2. United Kingdom
  • 16.3. Germany
  • 16.4. France
  • 16.5. Russia
  • 16.6. Italy
  • 16.7. Spain
  • 16.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 16.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 16.10. South Africa
  • 16.11. Denmark
  • 16.12. Netherlands
  • 16.13. Qatar
  • 16.14. Finland
  • 16.15. Sweden
  • 16.16. Nigeria
  • 16.17. Egypt
  • 16.18. Turkey
  • 16.19. Israel
  • 16.20. Norway
  • 16.21. Poland
  • 16.22. Switzerland

17. Asia-Pacific Heavy Construction Equipment Market

  • 17.1. Introduction
  • 17.2. China
  • 17.3. India
  • 17.4. Japan
  • 17.5. Australia
  • 17.6. South Korea
  • 17.7. Indonesia
  • 17.8. Thailand
  • 17.9. Philippines
  • 17.10. Malaysia
  • 17.11. Singapore
  • 17.12. Vietnam
  • 17.13. Taiwan

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 18.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 18.3.1. Astec Industries, Inc.
    • 18.3.2. Bauer Group
    • 18.3.3. Bell Equipment Ltd.
    • 18.3.4. Caterpillar Inc.
    • 18.3.5. CNH Industrial N.V.
    • 18.3.6. Deutz AG
    • 18.3.7. Doosan Bobcat Inc.
    • 18.3.8. Fayat Group
    • 18.3.9. Hidromek Co. Ltd.
    • 18.3.10. Hitachi, Ltd.
    • 18.3.11. Hyundai Construction Equipment Co., Ltd.
    • 18.3.12. J.C. Bamford Excavators Limited
    • 18.3.13. JLG Industries, Inc.
    • 18.3.14. John Deere GmbH & Co. KG
    • 18.3.15. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
    • 18.3.16. Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.
    • 18.3.17. Komatsu America Corp.
    • 18.3.18. Liebherr Group
    • 18.3.19. Manitowoc Company, Inc.
    • 18.3.20. SANY Group
    • 18.3.21. Tadano Ltd.
    • 18.3.22. Terex Corporation
    • 18.3.23. Volvo Group
    • 18.3.24. Wacker Neuson SE
    • 18.3.25. XCMG Group
    • 18.3.26. Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

19. ResearchAI

20. ResearchStatistics

21. ResearchContacts

22. ResearchArticles

23. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦