½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1809921

TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå : Á¦Ç° À¯Çüº°, ½Ã¼ú À¯Çüº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°, ¿ëµµº° - ¼¼°è ¿¹Ãø(2025-2030³â)

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market by Product Type, Procedure Type, End User, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2030

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: 360iResearch | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 190 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡á º¸°í¼­¿¡ µû¶ó ÃֽŠÁ¤º¸·Î ¾÷µ¥ÀÌÆ®ÇÏ¿© º¸³»µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¹è¼ÛÀÏÁ¤Àº ¹®ÀÇÇØ Áֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀåÀÇ 2024³â ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 1¾ï 260¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î, 2025³â¿¡´Â 1¾ï 683¸¸ ´Þ·¯·Î ¼ºÀåÇϸç, CAGRÀº 4.27%, 2030³â¿¡´Â 1¾ï 3,188¸¸ ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµË´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ¿ä ½ÃÀå Åë°è
±âÁØ¿¬µµ 2024 1¾ï 260¸¸ ´Þ·¯
ÃßÁ¤¿¬µµ 2025 1¾ï 683¸¸ ´Þ·¯
¿¹Ãø¿¬µµ 2030 1¾ï 3,188¸¸ ´Þ·¯
CAGR(%) 4.27%

µ¶º¸ÀûÀÎ ÀÓ»óÀû, ±â¼úÀû Çõ½ÅÀ¸·Î TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) Ä¡·áÀÇ ¹Ì·¡¸¦ ¿­¾î°¡´Ù.

°æÁ¤¸Æ °£³» ¹®¸Æ ´ë¼øÈ¯ ¼ÇÆ®(TIPS)´Â °£ ³»¿¡ ¹®¸Æ ¼øÈ¯°ú Àü½Å Á¤¸Æ ¼øÈ¯À» ¿¬°áÇÏ´Â À¯·Î¸¦ ¸¸µé¾î ¹®¸Æ¾Ð Ç×ÁøÁõÀ» ¿ÏÈ­ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î Çϴ ȹ±âÀûÀÎ ÁßÀçÀû Ä¡·á¹ýÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ Àúħ½ÀÀû Á¢±Ù¹ýÀº ³­Ä¡¼º º¹¼ö, Á¤¸Æ·ù ÃâÇ÷, Budd-Chiari ÁõÈıº, °£½Å ÁõÈıº°ú °°Àº ÇÕº´ÁõÀ» °ü¸®Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀû ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ¿¡¼­ Ç¥ÁØ Ä¡·á·Î ÀüȯµÇ¾î ½ÃÀÛ ÀÌÈÄ Å©°Ô ¹ßÀüÇØ ¿Ô½À´Ï´Ù. ¼ö³â°£ ½ºÅÙÆ® µðÀÚÀÎ, ¿µ»ó À¯µµ ¹× ½Ã¼ú¹ýÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ °³¼±À¸·Î TIPSSÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼º ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀϰú ÀÓ»óÀû À¯È¿¼ºÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ¾î ½ÉÇ÷°ü ¹× °£ Àü¹® ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

°æÁ¤¸Æ °£³» ¹®¸Æ ´ë¼øÈ¯ ¼ÇÆ®(TIPS) »óȲÀ» Á¤¹ÐÇϰí È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î Çü¼ºÇϰí, Çõ½ÅÀûÀÎ Áøº¸¸¦ Ž»ö

TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) Ä¡·áÀÇ »óȲÀº Àåºñ ¿£Áö´Ï¾î¸µ°ú ½Ã¼ú ÁöħÀÇ È¹±âÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀüÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Å« º¯È­¸¦ ¸ÂÀÌÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÃֽŠĿ¹öµå ½ºÅÙÆ® ±â¼úÀº ½ºÅÙÆ®³» ÀçÇùÂø ¹× ¼ÇÆ® ±â´É ºÎÀüÀ» Å©°Ô °¨¼Ò½ÃÄÑ °³Åë ±â°£À» ¿¬ÀåÇÏ°í ¹®¸Æ¾Ð Ç×ÁøÁõ ȯÀÚÀÇ Àå±âÀû ¿¹Èĸ¦ °³¼±Çß½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, º£¾î¸ÞÅ» ½ºÅÙÆ®ÀÇ °³¼±Àº ºñ¿ë°ú ½Ã¼úÀÇ À¯¿¬¼ºÀÌ ÃÖ¿ì¼±ÀÎ °æ¿ì º¸¿ÏÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒÀ» °è¼ÓÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡°¡ TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ Á¢±Ù¼º ¹× °æÁ¦¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâ Æò°¡

2025³â, ¹Ì±¹¿¡¼­´Â ¼öÀÔ ÀÇ·á±â±â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »õ·Î¿î °ü¼¼ Á¶Ä¡°¡ ½ÃÇàµÇ¸é¼­ TIPSS ºÎǰÀÇ °æÁ¦¼ºÀÌ ÁÖ¸ñ¹Þ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ½ºÅÙÆ® ¼öÀÔ ¹× ¾×¼¼¼­¸® ŰƮ¿¡ ºÎ°úµÇ´Â ÇÒÁõ·á·Î ÀÎÇØ Ư¼ö ÀÌ½ÄÆí, dz¼± Ä«Å×ÅÍ, È®Àå±âÀÇ À°»ó °¡°ÝÀÌ ´Ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î »ó½ÂÇÏ¿© º´¿øÀÇ Á¶´Þ ¿¹»ê¿¡ »ó½Â ¾Ð·ÂÀ» °¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °ø±Þ¾÷üµéÀÌ °¡°Ý ü°è¸¦ Àç°ËÅäÇÏ´Â °¡¿îµ¥, ÀÇ·á ¼­ºñ½º ÇÁ·Î¹ÙÀÌ´õµéÀº ´ëü Á¶´Þ Àü·«ÀÇ ºñ¿ë È¿À²¼ºÀ» Æò°¡Çß½À´Ï´Ù.

°æÁ¤¸Æ °£³» ¹®¸Æ ´ë¼øÈ¯ ¼ÇÆ®(TIPS) ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼® ¹× äÅà ¿ªÇп¡¼­ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °æ·Î¸¦ ¹àÈ÷´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ¼¼ºÐÈ­ °üÁ¡À» ¹àÈü´Ï´Ù.

Á¦Ç° À¯Çüº° ¼¼ºÐÈ­¸¦ ÀÚ¼¼È÷ »ìÆìº¸¸é, ¿À·§µ¿¾È ¾×¼¼¼­¸®º¸´Ù ½ºÅÙÆ®°¡ ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ¼±È£µÇ¾î ¿ÔÁö¸¸, ¼ÇÆ® ±â´É Àå¾Ö¸¦ °¨¼Ò½ÃŰ´Â ¿ì¼öÇÑ ¼º´ÉÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Ä¿¹ö°¡ ÀÖ´Â µðÀÚÀÎÀ¸·Î ÀüȯÀÌ µÎµå·¯Áö°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª°í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Ä¿¹öÇü ½ºÅÙÆ® Ä«Å×°í¸®¿¡¼­´Â °¢ Á¦Á¶¾÷üµéÀÌ µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ ±×·¡ÇÁÆ® ÄÚÆÃÀ̳ª À¯¿¬¼º°ú Á÷°æ ¹æÇâ °­µµÀÇ ±ÕÇüÀ» ¸ÂÃá ÇÏÀ̺긮µå ±Ý¼Ó ÇÕ±ÝÀ¸·Î Â÷º°È­¸¦ ²ÒÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÇÑÆí, dz¼± È®Àå±â, °¡ÀÌµå ½Ã½º µîÀÇ ¾×¼¼¼­¸®µµ °è¼Ó ÁøÈ­Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Àú¸¶Âû Æú¸®¸Ó¿Í °­È­µÈ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ ¼³°è¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ÀåÄ¡ Àü´ÞÀ» º¸´Ù È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î °³¼±Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«, À¯·´-Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«, ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) º¸±Þ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Áö¿ªÀû ¿ªÇÐ ¹× äÅà ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ ±Ô¸í

TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) Ä¡·áÀÇ º¸±Þ°ú ¹ßÀü¿¡´Â Áö¿ª¼ºÀÌ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌĨ´Ï´Ù. ºÏ¹Ì¿Í ³²¹Ì¿¡¼­´Â źźÇÑ »óȯ ü°è¿Í ³ôÀº ÀÇ·áºñ ÁöÃâÀÌ »õ·Î¿î ½ºÅÙÆ® ±â¼úÀÇ ºü¸¥ ÅëÇÕÀ» ÃËÁøÇϴ ȯ°æÀ» Á¶¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ´ëµµ½Ã Áö¿ªÀÇ ¿ì¼ö ¼¾ÅͰ¡ ÀÓ»ó½ÃÇèÀ» ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ÇÑÆí, Áö¹æ º´¿ø°ú Áö¿ª º´¿ø¿¡¼­´Â ȯÀÚ Á¢±Ù¼ºÀ» È®´ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ È®Àå °¡´ÉÇÑ ½Ã¼ú Ç÷§ÆûÀ» äÅÃÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä« Àüü¿¡¼­ ±ÔÁ¦ °æ·Î¿Í »óȯ ü°è°¡ ´Ù¸£±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Àåºñ Á¦Á¶¾÷ü¿Í Áö¿ª ÆÇ¸Å¾÷ü¿ÍÀÇ Àü·«Àû Á¦ÈÞ°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¼­À¯·´ À¯·´ÀÌ Áø·á ÆÐÅÏÀÇ ÁöÇ¥°¡ µÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹Áö¸¸, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ ½ÅÈï ½ÃÀåÀº ÁßÀçÀû ¿µ»óÀÇÇп¡ ´ëÇÑ ÅõÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¹Àº Á¤ºÎ°¡ Áö¿ª Àü¹®¼º°ú ÀÎÇÁ¶ó¸¦ ±¸ÃàÇϱâ À§ÇØ ±³À° ±¸»ó°ú ¹Î°ü ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» ±¸ÃàÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

2025³â TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå ÁøÃâ±â¾÷ÀÇ Àü·«Àû Çõ½Å, Á¦ÈÞ, °æÀï °øÀÛ ÇÏÀ̶óÀÌÆ®

°æ°æ°£³» ¿©°ú¼º °£µ¿¸Æ ¼ÇÆ® ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº °æÀï·ÂÀ» °­È­Çϱâ À§ÇØ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àü·«Àû ±¸»óÀ» Àü°³Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±âÁ¸ ÀÇ·á±â±â ¾÷üµéÀº ÀÌ½ÄÆíÀÇ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¼ÒÀç ¹× Àü´Þ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸ Á¦ÈÞ ¹× ÀÓ»ó °øµ¿¿¬±¸¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¦ÈÞ´Â ¿¬±¸½Ç¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¹ß°ßÀ» »ó¾÷Àû Á¦Ç°À¸·Î ÀüȯÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» °¡¼ÓÈ­ÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó, ±â¼ú Ç¥ÁØÈ­¸¦ ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â KOL(Key Opinion Leader)µé°úÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ °­È­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ¼Ö·ç¼ÇÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû È¿°ú¿Í ½ÃÀå ħÅõ·ÂÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ ½ÇÇà °¡´ÉÇÑ Àü·«Àû Áöħ ½ÃÇà

TIPSS ¿µ¿ªÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ±âȸ¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ°í ¿î¿µ»óÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾÷°è ¸®´õµéÀº ÀÓ»óÀÇ ±³À° ¹× ½Ã¼ú ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁýÁßÀûÀÎ ÅõÀÚ¸¦ ¿ì¼±½ÃÇØ¾ß ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °í±Þ ½ºÅÙÆ® »ðÀÔ¼ú°ú ¿µ»ó ÅëÇÕÀÇ ¼÷·Ãµµ¸¦ ¹è¾çÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ÀÇ·á¼¾ÅÍ´Â ÇÕº´Áõ ¹ß»ý·üÀ» ³·Ãß°í ȯÀÚ ¿¹Èĸ¦ °³¼±ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °£ÇÐȸ ¹× ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐȸ¿Í Çù·ÂÀû ÆÄÆ®³Ê½ÊÀ» ±¸ÃàÇÏ¿© º£½ºÆ® ÇÁ·¢Æ¼½º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÕÀǸ¦ ÃËÁøÇÏ°í ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀÇ·á ÇöÀå¿¡¼­ Æø³ÐÀº äÅÃÀ» ÃËÁøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇп¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°í ÆíÇâµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ÀλçÀÌÆ®¸¦ À§ÇØ ¾ö°ÝÇÑ È¥ÇÕ ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ý·Ð äÅÃ

º» ºÐ¼®Àº 1Â÷ Á¶»ç¿Í 2Â÷ Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÕÇÏ´Â ¾ö°ÝÇÑ È¥ÇÕ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀÇ Æ²À» Ȱ¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. 1Â÷ ÀÚ·á´Â ¿©·¯ Áö¿ªÀÇ ÁßÀçÀû ¹æ»ç¼±°ú Àü¹®ÀÇ, °£Áúȯ Àü¹®ÀÇ, Á¶´Þ Ã¥ÀÓÀÚ, ¾à»ç Àü¹®°¡¿ÍÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ ¼öÁýµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀλçÀÌÆ®´Â ÇǾºä Àú³Î, ±â±â µî·Ï, ÀÓ»ó½ÃÇè µ¥ÀÌÅͺ£À̽º, ÀϹݿ¡ °ø°³µÈ ±ÔÁ¦ ´ç±¹ ½Å°í¼­ µî 2Â÷ Á¤º¸ °ËÅ並 ÅëÇØ º¸¿ÏµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.

TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ±â¼ú ¹× ÀÓ»ó Àû¿ëÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ ±ËÀûÀ» ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ ¹ß°ßÀÇ ÅëÇÕ

ÀÓ»ó Çõ½Å, ±ÔÁ¦ »óȲÀÇ ÁøÈ­, °ø±Þ¸Á ÀûÀÀÀÌ ±³Â÷Çϸ鼭 TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt)ÀÇ »óȲÀº ¿ªµ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î º¯È­Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÄÚÆÃµÈ ½ºÅÙÆ® Àç·á, À̹ÌÁö ó¸® °¡´ÉÇÑ Àü´Þ ½Ã½ºÅÛ, ¿ø°Ý ȯÀÚ ¸ð´ÏÅ͸µÀÇ È¹±âÀûÀÎ ¹ßÀüÀº ÃÑüÀûÀ¸·Î Ä¡·á È¿°ú¸¦ Çâ»ó½Ã۰í Ä¡·á ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ» À籸¼ºÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µ¿½Ã¿¡, °ü¼¼ ±¸Á¶ÀÇ º¯È­¿Í Áö¿ªº° ȯ±ÞÀÇ ¹Ì¹¦ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº Á¦Á¶ °ÅÁ¡À» ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ°í ½ÃÀå ÁøÃâ Àü·«À» Á¤±³È­ÇØ¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺ÀÌ ´ëµÎµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå °³¿ä

Á¦4Àå ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

Á¦5Àå ½ÃÀå ¿ªÇÐ

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ÀλçÀÌÆ®

  • Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®
  • PESTEL ºÐ¼®

Á¦7Àå ¹Ì±¹ °ü¼¼ÀÇ ´©Àû ¿µÇâ 2025

Á¦8Àå TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå : Á¦Ç° À¯Çüº°

  • ºÎ¼Óǰ
  • ½ºÅÙÆ®
    • º£¾î¸ÞÅ» ½ºÅÙÆ®
    • Ä¿¹öµå ½ºÅÙÆ®

Á¦9Àå TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå : ½Ã¼ú À¯Çüº°

  • ¼±ÅÃÀû
  • ±ä±Þ

Á¦10Àå TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • ¿Ü·¡ ¼¾ÅÍ
  • º´¿ø
    • »ç¸³ º´¿ø
    • °ø¸³ º´¿ø
  • Àü¹® Ŭ¸®´Ð
    • °£Áúȯ ¼¾ÅÍ
    • ¹æ»ç¼± ¼¾ÅÍ

Á¦11Àå TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå : ¿ëµµº°

  • ¹öµå Ű¾Æ¸® ÁõÈıº
  • °£½ÅÁõÈıº
    • 1Çü(HRS-1)
    • 2Çü(HRS-2)
  • ³­Ä¡¼º º¹¼ö
    • ÀÌ´¢Á¦ ºÎÀûÀÀ º¹¼ö
    • ÀÌ´¢Á¦ ÀúÇ×¼º º¹¼ö
  • Á¤¸Æ·ù ÃâÇ÷

Á¦12Àå ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«ÀÇ TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå

  • ¹Ì±¹
  • ij³ª´Ù
  • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
  • ºê¶óÁú
  • ¾Æ¸£ÇîÆ¼³ª

Á¦13Àå À¯·´, Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«ÀÇ TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå

  • ¿µ±¹
  • µ¶ÀÏ
  • ÇÁ¶û½º
  • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
  • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
  • ½ºÆäÀÎ
  • ¾Æ¶ø¿¡¹Ì¸®Æ®
  • »ç¿ìµð¾Æ¶óºñ¾Æ
  • ³²¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«°øÈ­±¹
  • µ§¸¶Å©
  • ³×´ú¶õµå
  • īŸ¸£
  • Çɶõµå
  • ½º¿þµ§
  • ³ªÀÌÁö¸®¾Æ
  • ÀÌÁýÆ®
  • Æ¢¸£Å°¿¹
  • À̽º¶ó¿¤
  • ³ë¸£¿þÀÌ
  • Æú¶õµå
  • ½ºÀ§½º

Á¦14Àå ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾çÀÇ TIPS(Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) ½ÃÀå

  • Áß±¹
  • Àεµ
  • ÀϺ»
  • È£ÁÖ
  • Çѱ¹
  • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
  • ű¹
  • Çʸ®ÇÉ
  • ¸»·¹À̽þÆ
  • ½Ì°¡Æ÷¸£
  • º£Æ®³²
  • ´ë¸¸

Á¦15Àå °æÀï ±¸µµ

  • ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®, 2024
  • FPNV Æ÷Áö¼Å´× ¸ÅÆ®¸¯½º, 2024
  • °æÀï ºÐ¼®
    • Boston Scientific Corporation
    • W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
    • Cook Group Incorporated
    • Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • AngioDynamics Inc.
    • Argon Medical Devices, Inc.
    • Siemens Healthineers AG
    • Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
    • Sirtex Medical Inc.

Á¦16Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ AI

Á¦17Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ Åë°è

Á¦18Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ÄÁÅÃ

Á¦19Àå ¸®¼­Ä¡ ±â»ç

Á¦20Àå ºÎ·Ï

KSA 25.09.24

The Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market was valued at USD 102.60 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 106.83 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 4.27%, reaching USD 131.88 million by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 102.60 million
Estimated Year [2025] USD 106.83 million
Forecast Year [2030] USD 131.88 million
CAGR (%) 4.27%

Pioneering the Future of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Therapy with Unmatched Clinical and Technological Innovations

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPSS) represents a landmark interventional procedure designed to alleviate portal hypertension by creating a channel that connects the portal and systemic venous circulations within the liver. This minimally invasive approach has evolved significantly since its inception, transitioning from experimental protocols to a standard of care for managing complications such as refractory ascites, variceal bleeding, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and hepatorenal syndrome. Over the years, continuous improvements in stent design, imaging guidance, and procedural techniques have enhanced both the safety profile and clinical efficacy of TIPSS, driving its adoption across cardiovascular and hepatology specialties.

Beyond clinical performance, TIPSS has catalyzed a broader transformation in interventional radiology workflows, prompting deeper collaboration between hepatologists and radiologists. With the expansion of imaging modalities such as intravascular ultrasound and cone-beam computed tomography, physicians can now achieve unparalleled precision during stent deployment. As practitioners refine patient selection criteria in line with evolving guidelines, those involved in device development, hospital procurement, and health policy recognize that sustaining these advances will require concerted efforts in training, evidence generation, and supply chain resilience.

Navigating Transformative Advances Reshaping the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Landscape with Precision and Efficacy

The landscape of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt therapy has entered a phase of profound transformation driven by breakthroughs in device engineering and procedural guidance. Modern covered stent technologies have substantially reduced instances of in-stent restenosis and shunt dysfunction, thereby prolonging patency and improving long-term outcomes for patients with portal hypertension. Meanwhile, refinements to bare metal stents continue to play a complementary role where cost considerations and procedural flexibility are paramount.

Moreover, the integration of real-time imaging techniques has revolutionized interventional workflows. Advanced needle guidance systems and three-dimensional reconstruction software enable clinicians to navigate complex hepatic vasculature with unprecedented accuracy. As a result, complication rates have declined and procedural durations have shortened, paving the way for broader adoption in both tertiary care centers and specialized outpatient settings.

Furthermore, clinical guidelines have adapted to reflect these technological gains, expanding the indications for TIPSS to include patients with refractory ascites and select cases of hepatorenal syndrome. In parallel, remote monitoring solutions and digital health platforms are emerging to support post-procedural surveillance, ensuring early detection of shunt dysfunction and enhancing long-term patient management.

Evaluating the Comprehensive Impact of Emerging United States Tariff Measures on Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Device Accessibility and Affordability

In 2025, newly implemented U.S. tariff measures targeting imported medical devices have brought the economics of TIPSS components into sharp focus. Levies imposed on stent imports and accessory kits have incrementally increased the landed cost of specialized grafts, balloon catheters, and dilators, thereby exerting upward pressure on hospital procurement budgets. As suppliers reassess their price structures, healthcare providers are evaluating the cost-effectiveness of alternative sourcing strategies.

Consequently, device manufacturers are accelerating efforts to localize production within domestic facilities. By establishing U.S.-based manufacturing lines for covered stent materials and accessory assemblies, leading vendors are striving to mitigate tariff exposure and stabilize pricing. This shift also aligns with broader industry initiatives supporting supply chain resilience and operational continuity.

At the same time, hospital systems are leveraging group purchasing organizations and value-based contracting models to absorb incremental cost increases without compromising patient access. In some cases, providers have renegotiated service agreements to bundle TIPSS procedural costs with downstream imaging follow-up, thereby preserving overall reimbursement margins. Looking ahead, tighter collaboration between policy makers and industry stakeholders may be necessary to ensure that tariff policies support both innovation incentives and patient affordability.

Unveiling Critical Segmentation Perspectives That Illuminate Diverse Pathways in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market Analysis and Adoption Dynamics

An in-depth examination of product type segmentation reveals that stents have long dominated clinical preference over accessories, with a pronounced shift toward covered designs due to their superior performance in reducing shunt dysfunction. Within the covered stent category, manufacturers are differentiating through proprietary graft coatings and hybrid metal alloys aimed at balancing flexibility with radial strength. Meanwhile, accessories such as balloon dilators and guide sheaths continue to evolve, incorporating low-friction polymers and enhanced profile designs to streamline device delivery.

Turning to procedural segmentation, elective TIPSS placements account for a significant proportion of cases, driven by scheduled interventions for refractory ascites and variceal bleeding prevention. In contrast, emergency procedures are reserved for acute hemorrhagic events, where rapid access to specialized equipment and multidisciplinary coordination becomes critical. As a result, service providers are optimizing inventory allocation and on-call staffing to ensure readiness across both elective and emergent care pathways.

Insights into end-user dynamics show that hospitals remain the cornerstone of TIPSS delivery, with private institutions often pioneering new techniques and public hospitals extending access to underserved populations. Ambulatory centers are steadily expanding their role in lower-risk procedures, benefiting from streamlined reimbursement and shorter patient stays. Specialty clinics, particularly hepatology centers and radiology centers, are also carving out niche capabilities by offering integrated pre- and post-procedural care protocols that improve long-term patient monitoring and reduce readmission rates.

Application segmentation underscores the diverse clinical scenarios in which TIPSS provides therapeutic benefit. Management of Budd-Chiari syndrome and variceal bleeding continues to be a core indication, while refractory ascites cases-whether diuretic ineligible or diuretic resistant-are driving incremental adoption. Furthermore, the nuanced treatment of hepatorenal syndrome, spanning Type 1 and Type 2 presentations, is gaining traction as evidence mounts supporting early intervention. These varied applications collectively shape a dynamic market landscape in which device developers and care providers must tailor solutions to meet evolving clinical needs.

Deciphering Regional Dynamics and Adoption Drivers Influencing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Utilization Across Americas EMEA and Asia-Pacific

Regional considerations profoundly influence the uptake and evolution of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt therapy. In North and South America, robust reimbursement frameworks and high healthcare expenditure create an environment conducive to the rapid integration of novel stent technologies. Centers of excellence in metropolitan areas spearhead clinical trials, while rural and community hospitals adopt scalable procedural platforms to broaden patient access. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, variations in regulatory pathways and reimbursement schemes necessitate strategic alliances between device makers and regional distributors. Western Europe often serves as a bellwether for practice patterns, while emerging markets in the Middle East and Africa demonstrate growing interest in interventional radiology investments. Many governments are launching training initiatives and public-private partnerships to build local expertise and infrastructure.

Alternatively, the Asia-Pacific landscape features a dual trend of mature markets such as Japan and Australia embracing incremental innovations, and rapidly developing nations in Southeast Asia investing in capacity building. Rising incidences of liver disease, coupled with expanding healthcare coverage, are prompting hospitals and specialty clinics to incorporate TIPSS into their therapeutic portfolios. Moreover, regional consortiums are driving guidelines alignment, fostering consistency in patient selection and procedural protocols across borders.

Taken together, these diverse regional dynamics underscore the importance of a tailored approach to market entry, where local regulatory nuance, reimbursement environments, and clinical training frameworks converge to shape long-term adoption trajectories.

Highlighting Strategic Innovations, Collaborations, and Competitive Maneuvers by Leading Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market Participants in 2025

Leading stakeholders in the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt market are deploying a range of strategic initiatives to consolidate their competitive positions. Established medical device conglomerates have invested heavily in research partnerships and clinical collaborations to refine graft biomaterials and delivery systems. These alliances not only accelerate the translation of laboratory findings into commercial offerings but also strengthen relationships with key opinion leaders who guide procedural standardization.

At the same time, agile innovators and start-ups are challenging the status quo with modular stent architectures and disposable accessory platforms designed to reduce inventory overhead. Several emerging players have secured breakthrough device designations, leveraging faster regulatory pathways in multiple regions. Furthermore, co-development agreements between global device manufacturers and local producers are on the rise, enabling tailored solutions that address specific market requirements such as cost containment and clinician preferences.

In addition, strategic acquisitions and licensing deals are enabling key participants to expand their intellectual property portfolios and bolster end-to-end service capabilities. As a result, integrated service models that combine device provision with advanced imaging support and procedural training are becoming a differentiator in high-growth markets. Collectively, these corporate maneuvers are reshaping the competitive landscape, heightening the importance of agility, customer engagement, and continuous innovation.

Implementing Actionable Strategic Directives to Amplify Clinical Efficacy and Market Penetration for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Solutions

To capitalize on emerging opportunities and address operational challenges in the TIPSS domain, industry leaders should prioritize targeted investments in clinician education and procedural simulation programs. By fostering proficiency in advanced stent deployment techniques and imaging integration, medical centers can reduce complication rates and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, forging collaborative partnerships with hepatology and radiology societies will drive consensus on best practices, facilitating broader adoption across diverse care settings.

Another critical recommendation involves strengthening supply chain resilience through localization of key manufacturing processes. Establishing regional production hubs for graft materials and accessories not only mitigates the impact of international tariff fluctuations but also shortens lead times and supports emergency procedural readiness. Parallel to manufacturing strategies, device suppliers should engage with payers and health authorities to demonstrate the value proposition of TIPSS in reducing hospital admissions and long-term care costs.

Finally, organizations should develop data-driven post-market surveillance frameworks to capture real-world performance metrics. Leveraging digital health platforms and remote monitoring tools will enable continuous quality improvement, inform iterative device enhancements, and substantiate reimbursement claims. Collectively, these actionable steps will empower stakeholders to navigate regulatory complexities, reinforce clinical efficacy, and secure sustainable growth in a competitive marketplace.

Employing Rigorous Mixed Methodology Frameworks to Ensure Robust and Unbiased Insights into Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market Dynamics

This analysis leverages a rigorous mixed methodology framework characterized by the integration of primary and secondary research. Primary inputs were gathered through in-depth interviews with interventional radiologists, hepatology specialists, procurement directors, and regulatory affairs experts across multiple regions. These insights were complemented by secondary source reviews, including peer-reviewed journals, device registries, clinical trial databases, and publicly available regulatory filings.

The approach further incorporated data triangulation techniques to validate findings and reconcile disparate viewpoints. Quantitative data points on procedural volumes, device utilization trends, and reimbursement policies were cross-referenced against qualitative perspectives from key opinion leaders. Additionally, the research team conducted a comprehensive competitor landscape assessment, combining patent analytics with corporate financial disclosures to uncover strategic trajectories.

Throughout the study, adherence to stringent quality protocols ensured the elimination of bias and the maintenance of analytical integrity. Continuous peer reviews and stakeholder consultations reinforced the credibility of the conclusions, delivering a robust foundation for strategic decision-making in the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt arena.

Synthesizing Key Findings to Illuminate the Future Trajectory of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Technologies and Clinical Applications

The intersection of clinical innovation, regulatory evolution, and supply chain adaptation underscores the dynamic nature of the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt landscape. Breakthroughs in covered stent materials, imaging-enabled delivery systems, and remote patient monitoring are collectively enhancing procedural efficacy and reshaping treatment paradigms. Simultaneously, shifting tariff structures and regional reimbursement nuances are driving stakeholders to optimize manufacturing footprints and refine market access strategies.

Looking ahead, the continued expansion of TIPSS indications, including nuanced treatment of hepatorenal syndrome and refractory ascites subtypes, points toward sustained clinical demand. The competitive environment will likely intensify as established players deepen their offerings and emerging innovators introduce next-generation platforms. Against this backdrop, a data-driven approach to real-world evidence, collaborative guideline development, and adaptive reimbursement frameworks will be essential to unlock enduring value for both patients and healthcare systems.

In summary, the trajectory of TIPSS market evolution promises to be defined by the integration of advanced technologies, strategic partnerships, and an unwavering focus on patient outcomes. Stakeholders equipped with comprehensive insights and actionable recommendations will be best positioned to navigate this complex and rapidly evolving domain.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

  • 5.1. Rising global prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis driving demand for TIPS procedures
  • 5.2. Innovation in ePTFE covered stent technology improving long-term TIPS patency rates
  • 5.3. Integration of image-guided navigation systems enhancing precision in TIPS placement
  • 5.4. Adoption of telehealth platforms for postoperative monitoring of TIPS patients in remote regions
  • 5.5. Regulatory approvals for novel biodegradable stents expanding TIPS market opportunities
  • 5.6. Rising healthcare investments in emerging markets fueling uptake of TIPS interventions
  • 5.7. Hybrid operating room platforms supporting combined TIPS and portal vein embolization procedures
  • 5.8. Growing emphasis on cost-effectiveness analyses influencing hospital adoption of TIPS technology
  • 5.9. Development of standardized training programs improving clinician proficiency in TIPS techniques
  • 5.10. Enhanced antibiotic prophylaxis protocols reducing infection rates after transjugular shunt placement

6. Market Insights

  • 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Accessories
  • 8.3. Stents
    • 8.3.1. Bare Metal Stent
    • 8.3.2. Covered Stent

9. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market, by Procedure Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Elective
  • 9.3. Emergency

10. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market, by End User

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Ambulatory Centers
  • 10.3. Hospitals
    • 10.3.1. Private Hospital
    • 10.3.2. Public Hospital
  • 10.4. Specialty Clinics
    • 10.4.1. Hepatology Center
    • 10.4.2. Radiology Center

11. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Budd-Chiari Syndrome
  • 11.3. Hepatorenal Syndrome
    • 11.3.1. Type 1 Hrs
    • 11.3.2. Type 2 Hrs
  • 11.4. Refractory Ascites
    • 11.4.1. Diuretic Ineligible Ascites
    • 11.4.2. Diuretic Resistant Ascites
  • 11.5. Variceal Bleeding

12. Americas Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market

  • 12.1. Introduction
  • 12.2. United States
  • 12.3. Canada
  • 12.4. Mexico
  • 12.5. Brazil
  • 12.6. Argentina

13. Europe, Middle East & Africa Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market

  • 13.1. Introduction
  • 13.2. United Kingdom
  • 13.3. Germany
  • 13.4. France
  • 13.5. Russia
  • 13.6. Italy
  • 13.7. Spain
  • 13.8. United Arab Emirates
  • 13.9. Saudi Arabia
  • 13.10. South Africa
  • 13.11. Denmark
  • 13.12. Netherlands
  • 13.13. Qatar
  • 13.14. Finland
  • 13.15. Sweden
  • 13.16. Nigeria
  • 13.17. Egypt
  • 13.18. Turkey
  • 13.19. Israel
  • 13.20. Norway
  • 13.21. Poland
  • 13.22. Switzerland

14. Asia-Pacific Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Market

  • 14.1. Introduction
  • 14.2. China
  • 14.3. India
  • 14.4. Japan
  • 14.5. Australia
  • 14.6. South Korea
  • 14.7. Indonesia
  • 14.8. Thailand
  • 14.9. Philippines
  • 14.10. Malaysia
  • 14.11. Singapore
  • 14.12. Vietnam
  • 14.13. Taiwan

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Boston Scientific Corporation
    • 15.3.2. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
    • 15.3.3. Cook Group Incorporated
    • 15.3.4. Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 15.3.5. AngioDynamics Inc.
    • 15.3.6. Argon Medical Devices, Inc.
    • 15.3.7. Siemens Healthineers AG
    • 15.3.8. Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
    • 15.3.9. Sirtex Medical Inc.

16. ResearchAI

17. ResearchStatistics

18. ResearchContacts

19. ResearchArticles

20. Appendix

»ùÇà ¿äû ¸ñ·Ï
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
¸ñ·Ï º¸±â
Àüü»èÁ¦