시장보고서
상품코드
1835187

그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 제품 유형, 용도, 최종 이용 산업, 소스 기술, 유통 채널별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Green & Bio Solvents Market by Product Type, Application, End Use Industry, Source Technology, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 185 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

그린 및 바이오 용제 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 9.05%로 114억 3,000만 달러로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 2024년 57억 1,000만 달러
추정 연도 2025년 62억 2,000만 달러
예측 연도 2032년 114억 3,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 9.05%

진화하는 그린 및 바이오 용제 부문의 촉진요인, 분석 범위, 산업 이해 관계자의 전략적 목표에 초점을 맞춘 오리엔테이션

주요 요약의 서두에서는 친환경 및 바이오 솔벤트 부문에 대한 간략한 오리엔테이션을 통해 규제 당국의 압력, 기업의 지속가능성에 대한 약속, 기술 성숙을 배경으로 기존 석유화학 용매에서 바이오 기반 및 친환경 대체 용매로의 전환에 대해 설명합니다.에 대해 설명합니다. 서론에서는 검토 대상인 1차 화학제품에 대한 개요를 설명하고, 원료 조달, 공정 강화, 최종 용도 요구사항의 상호 관계를 강조합니다. 원료 기술 및 유통 전략의 혁신을 중심으로 경쟁 상황을 정리하고, 제조, 제형, 공급망 각 부문의 이해관계자들이 조달 및 제품 개발 로드맵을 재검토해야 하는 이유를 밝힙니다.

서론에서는 배경뿐만 아니라 분석 범위와 주요 목적, 즉 기술 궤적을 밝히고, 정책적 조치가 무역 흐름에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 평가하고, 상업적 의사결정을 보다 명확하게 하여 인사이트를 제공하는 것을 목표로 하고 있습니다. 또한, 상업적 타당성과 과학적 엄밀성을 모두 확보하기 위해 1차 산업 인터뷰와 기술 문헌 검토의 균형을 맞춘 조사 방법을 강조하고 있습니다. 마지막으로, 서론에서는 본 보고서의 구성과 그에 따른 전략적 제안의 유형을 설명함으로써 독자들의 기대감을 높이고, 경영진이 조달, 연구개발, 약사법, 기업 전략과 관련된 섹션을 쉽게 파악할 수 있도록 하였습니다.

생명공학, 공정 강화, 지속가능성에 대한 요구가 용제 시장의 공급업체 생태계와 상거래를 재구성하는 방법

그린 용제와 바이오 솔벤트의 환경은 기술적 비약적 발전이 규제 규범의 진화 및 고객 선호도의 변화와 맞물리면서 변모하고 있습니다. 효소 합성 및 발효의 발전은 복잡한 용매 화학의 진입 장벽을 낮추고, 연속 흐름 및 초임계 이산화탄소 추출과 같은 공정 혁신은 수율을 향상시키고 에너지 강도를 감소시키고 있습니다. 이러한 기술 주도의 개선은 특수 화학 기업, 산업 생명공학 스타트업, 전략적 파트너십을 추구하는 기존 석유화학 기업 등 확대되는 공급업체 생태계에 의해 보완되고 있습니다.

동시에, 지속가능성 의무화와 기업의 넷제로(Net Zero)에 대한 약속은 라이프사이클 온실가스 강도가 낮고 생분해성이 개선된 용매에 대한 수요를 가속화하고 있습니다. 따라서 코팅제, 접착제, 퍼스널케어 배합사들은 성능과 규제 기준을 모두 충족하는 대체 화학제품을 검증할 필요가 있습니다. 또한, 유통 모델도 변화하고 있으며, 커스텀 등급의 직접 판매 관계가 샘플에서 스케일까지의 시간을 단축하는 디지털 채널과 공존하고 있습니다. 원료의 탄력성, 생산 효율성, 효과적인 환경 주장을 통합한 기업은 제제 파트너십 및 조달 프레임워크에서 선점 이익을 확보할 수 있을 것으로 보입니다.

2025년 미국의 관세 조치가 가치사슬 전반에 걸쳐 조달 경제, 공급망 탄력성 전략, 지역 생산 의사결정에 어떤 변화를 가져왔는지 평가합니다.

미국의 2025년 관세 도입은 친환경 용제 및 바이오 용제 가치사슬의 구조적 역학을 복잡하게 만들고, 비용 방정식을 변화시키고, 무역 흐름을 우회하고, 지역화 전략을 가속화했습니다. 관세 조치로 인해 수입업체와 다운스트림 제제 제조업체는 조달 발자국을 재검토하고, 일부 업체는 국내 생산자나 미국 이외의 무역 파트너를 통해 가까운 장래에 공급을 확보하게 되었습니다. 그 결과, 공급망 탄력성이 전략적 우선순위로 자리 잡게 되었고, 조달팀은 관세 민감도와 물류 변동성을 공급업체 자격 및 계약 조건에 반영하기 시작했습니다.

수입 비용과 납기 지연 가능성에 대응하기 위해 제조업체들은 현지 생산과 원료 제조 및 가공에 대한 후방 통합을 우선시하게 되었습니다. 이 전략적 축은 관세 변동 위험을 줄이고, 시제품에서 제품화까지의 리드타임을 단축할 수 있습니다. 또한, 관세는 현지 제조 능력 구축과 세계 조달에 의존하는 것의 상대적 경제성에 영향을 미침으로써 투자 의사결정에도 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 그 결과, 생산의 온쇼어링을 위한 파트너십, 라이선싱 계약, 합작 투자에 대한 관심이 높아진 반면, 이해관계자들은 국경 간 자본 배분 및 무역 관계에 더 많은 영향을 미칠 수 있는 정책 전환과 잠재적 보복 조치를 지속적으로 모니터링하고 있습니다.

제품 화학, 용도 요건, 최종 용도 행동, 공급원 기술, 유통 전략이 교차하여 채택 경로가 형성되는 지점을 파악할 수 있는 세분화 중심의 종합적인 인텔리전스

주요 세분화 인사이트는 제품 유형, 용도, 최종 사용 산업, 공급원 기술, 유통 채널에서 차별화된 비즈니스 기회와 채택 역학에 대한 인사이트를 제공합니다. 제품 유형별로는 알코올계 용매, 에스테르계 용매, 글리콜계 용매, 케톤계 용매에 따라 수요 패턴이 다르며, 성능 요건과 규제 고려사항이 대체품의 우선순위를 형성하고 있습니다. 용도별로는 접착제 및 실란트, 세척 및 탈지, 코팅제 및 페인트, 의약품 및 퍼스널케어, 섬유 가공 등의 시장 요구에 따라 특정 순도, 냄새, 용해성 매개 변수가 규정되어 배합 선택 및 공급업체 선택에 영향을 미칩니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 제품 유형별

  • 알코올 용제
  • 에스테르 용제
  • 글리콜 용제
  • 케톤 용제

제9장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 용도별

  • 접착제와 실란트
  • 세정과 탈지
  • 코팅과 페인트
  • 의약품과 퍼스널케어
  • 섬유 가공

제10장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 최종 이용 산업별

  • 자동차
  • 소비재
  • 산업 제조업
  • 석유 및 가스
  • 의약품

제11장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 소스 기술별

  • 화학 합성
  • 효소 합성
  • 발효
  • 초임계 이산화탄소 추출

제12장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 유통 채널별

  • 직접 판매
  • 산업 유통
  • 온라인 채널

제13장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제14장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제15장 그린 및 바이오 용제 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제16장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024년
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024년
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Dow Inc.
    • BASF SE
    • Eastman Chemical Company
    • LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
    • Evonik Industries AG
    • Solvay S.A.
    • Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
    • Clariant AG
    • DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
    • Corbion N.V.
KSM 25.11.03

The Green & Bio Solvents Market is projected to grow by USD 11.43 billion at a CAGR of 9.05% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 5.71 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 6.22 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 11.43 billion
CAGR (%) 9.05%

A focused orientation to the evolving green and bio solvents sector highlighting drivers, analytical scope, and strategic objectives for industry stakeholders

The executive summary opens with a concise orientation to the green and bio solvents space, describing the shift from conventional petrochemical solvents toward bio-based and greener alternatives driven by regulatory pressure, corporate sustainability commitments, and technology maturation. The introduction outlines the primary chemical classes under consideration and emphasizes the interplay between feedstock sourcing, process intensification, and end-use requirements. It frames the competitive landscape around innovation in source technologies and distribution strategies, clarifying why stakeholders across manufacturing, formulation, and supply chain roles must reassess procurement and product development roadmaps.

Moving beyond background, the introduction establishes the analytical scope and core objectives: to illuminate technology trajectories, assess how policy actions influence trade flows, and provide segmentation-based insights that sharpen commercial decisions. It highlights the methodological approach that balances primary industry interviews with technical literature review to ensure both commercial relevance and scientific rigor. Finally, the introduction sets reader expectations by describing the structure of the report and the types of strategic recommendations that follow, ensuring executives can quickly identify sections relevant to procurement, R&D, regulatory affairs, and corporate strategy.

How converging advances in biotechnology, process intensification, and sustainability mandates are reshaping supplier ecosystems and commercial pathways in solvent markets

The landscape of green and bio solvents is undergoing transformative shifts as technological breakthroughs converge with evolving regulatory norms and shifting customer preferences. Advances in enzymatic synthesis and fermentation are reducing barrier-to-entry for complex solvent chemistries, while process innovations such as continuous flow and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction are improving yields and reducing energy intensity. These technology-led improvements are complemented by an expanding supplier ecosystem that now includes specialty chemical firms, industrial biotech startups, and incumbent petrochemical players pursuing strategic partnerships.

Concurrently, sustainability mandates and corporate net-zero commitments are accelerating demand for solvents with lower lifecycle greenhouse gas intensity and improved biodegradability. This is prompting formulators in coatings, adhesives, and personal care to validate alternative chemistries that meet both performance and regulatory criteria. Moreover, distribution models are shifting; direct sales relationships for custom grades coexist with digital channels enabling faster sample-to-scale timelines. Taken together, these shifts create new competitive levers: companies that integrate feedstock resilience, production efficiency, and validated environmental claims will secure early- mover advantage in formulation partnerships and procurement frameworks.

Assessing how the 2025 United States tariff measures reshaped sourcing economics, supply chain resilience strategies, and regional production decisions across the value chain

The introduction of tariffs by the United States in 2025 has compounded structural dynamics within the green and bio solvents value chain, altering cost equations, rerouting trade flows, and accelerating regionalization strategies. Tariff measures have incentivized importers and downstream formulators to reassess sourcing footprints, prompting some to secure nearer-term supply via domestic producers or non-US trade partners. Consequently, supply chain resilience became a higher strategic priority, with procurement teams incorporating tariff sensitivity and logistics variability into supplier qualification and contractual terms.

In response to added import costs and potential delivery delays, manufacturers have prioritized localized production and backward integration into feedstock manufacturing or processing. This strategic pivot reduces exposure to tariff volatility and shortens lead times for prototype-to-commercialization cycles. Additionally, tariffs have influenced investment decisions by affecting the relative economics of establishing regional manufacturing capacity versus relying on global sourcing. As a result, partnerships, licensing agreements, and joint ventures aimed at onshoring production have gained prominence, while stakeholders continue to monitor policy shifts and potential retaliatory measures that may further influence cross-border capital allocation and trade relationships.

Comprehensive segmentation-driven intelligence revealing where product chemistry, application requirements, end-use behavior, source technology, and distribution strategies intersect to shape adoption pathways

Key segmentation insights reveal differentiated opportunities and adoption dynamics across product types, applications, end-use industries, source technologies, and distribution channels. Based on Product Type, demand patterns vary between Alcohol Solvents, Ester Solvents, Glycol Solvents, and Ketone Solvents, with performance requirements and regulatory considerations shaping substitution priorities. Based on Application, the needs of markets such as Adhesives And Sealants, Cleaning And Degreasing, Coatings And Paints, Pharmaceuticals And Personal Care, and Textile Processing dictate specific purity, odor, and solvency parameters that influence formulation choices and supplier selection.

Based on End Use Industry, adoption trajectories differ across Automotive, Consumer Goods, Industrial Manufacturing, Oil And Gas, and Pharmaceuticals, with each sector balancing cost, performance, and sustainability claims differently. Based on Source Technology, alternatives produced via Chemical Synthesis, Enzymatic Synthesis, Fermentation, and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction present trade-offs between capital intensity, feedstock flexibility, and environmental profiles that affect commercialization timelines. Based on Distribution Channel, the relative prominence of Direct Sales, Industrial Distribution, and Online Channels affects time-to-sample, technical support availability, and the ability to scale niche grades. Collectively, these segmentation lenses illuminate where commercial and technical interventions will most effectively accelerate adoption and where tailored go-to-market approaches will be required.

Regional analysis explaining how trade policy, regulatory stringency, industrial concentration, and biotech investment shape adoption, sourcing, and innovation across global markets

Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on how green and bio solvents are sourced, regulated, and commercialized across global value chains. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on lifecycle greenhouse gas accounting and growing domestic biotech capacity are encouraging localized production and innovation partnerships between industrial formulators and feedstock suppliers. This region is also sensitive to trade policy shifts that affect cross-border flows and procurement strategies, prompting stakeholders to prioritize supply chain redundancy and domestic validation capabilities.

Europe, Middle East & Africa combines stringent chemical regulations and ambitious sustainability targets with a diverse industrial base that includes major coatings and pharmaceutical clusters. This environment encourages early adoption of certified bio-based solvents and strong traceability mechanisms, while also fostering collaborative R&D consortia that integrate academic, industrial, and governmental resources. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization, substantial manufacturing scale, and aggressive investments in biotechnology create both large demand centers and competitive production hubs. This region's capacity for cost-competitive output and innovation in fermentation and enzymatic processes positions it as a critical node for global supply and technology diffusion, though stakeholders must navigate heterogeneous regulatory frameworks and sustainability expectations.

Insights into competitive positioning and strategic moves among incumbents and innovators as they pursue scale, technology leadership, and verifiable sustainability in solvent solutions

Competitive dynamics in the green and bio solvents arena are driven by a mix of specialty chemical incumbents, agile biotech entrants, and strategic collaborations that blend deep process knowledge with feedstock innovation. Leading firms are differentiating through proprietary process technologies, investments in sustainable feedstocks, and the development of performance-validated solvent grades tailored to key industrial formulations. At the same time, smaller, technology-focused companies are leveraging enzymatic and fermentation expertise to deliver niche chemistries with favorable environmental profiles, often partnering with larger players to access scale and distribution capabilities.

Corporate strategies in this space emphasize vertical integration, intellectual property protection, and strategic M&A to secure technology stacks and feedstock supply. Companies are also investing heavily in product certification and third-party lifecycle verification to substantiate environmental claims and facilitate market acceptance among formulators and procurement teams. Additionally, collaborative models-such as co-development agreements and toll manufacturing partnerships-have emerged as practical routes to accelerate market entry while sharing capital and operational risk. Ultimately, commercial success will hinge on the ability to balance technical performance, cost competitiveness, and verifiable sustainability credentials.

A practical, multi-pronged playbook for corporate leaders to secure feedstock resilience, accelerate scale-up, and validate sustainability claims to win formulation and procurement decisions

Industry leaders must adopt a multi-dimensional playbook that accelerates commercialization while protecting margins and ensuring regulatory compliance. First, prioritize feedstock diversification by establishing partnerships across agricultural, waste-derived, and biorefinery sources to mitigate supply volatility and reduce exposure to trade policy shifts. Second, invest in process intensification and modular production technologies to shorten scale-up timelines and lower capital per unit of output, which supports faster response to shifting demand patterns. Third, pursue product validation pathways by aligning technical performance testing with third-party environmental verification and sector-specific regulatory requirements to reduce barriers to adoption among conservative formulators.

Moreover, firms should embed tariff sensitivity and scenario planning into procurement and investment decisions to maintain flexibility in sourcing and production siting. Companies should also develop commercial architectures that combine direct technical support for strategic accounts with broader distribution for commodity grades. Finally, invest in capability-building across regulatory affairs, lifecycle assessment, and sustainable marketing to ensure that environmental claims are credible, defensible, and aligned with customer procurement criteria. Taken together, these actions increase resilience, shorten commercialization cycles, and create defensible differentiation in a rapidly shifting market.

A rigorous mixed-methods approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical validation, lifecycle analysis, and scenario planning to produce commercially actionable findings

The research methodology combines qualitative primary engagement with quantitative technical validation to produce actionable insights. Primary research included structured interviews with procurement leaders, R&D heads, and process engineers across end-use industries to capture real-world constraints, performance thresholds, and commercial priorities. These conversations were complemented by site visits and technical briefings that clarified manufacturing realities and scale-up considerations. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed literature, patent landscapes, and regulatory documentation to verify technology claims and to understand compliance obligations and certification pathways.

Analytical techniques included supply chain mapping to identify chokepoints and tariff exposure, lifecycle assessment frameworks to evaluate environmental performance across production routes, and technology readiness assessments to gauge commercialization timelines. Scenario analysis was applied to explore the implications of policy shifts, such as tariff changes and evolving chemical regulation, enabling robust strategic recommendations. Finally, findings were synthesised through cross-validation between primary inputs and technical evidence to ensure recommendations are both commercially relevant and scientifically grounded.

A concise synthesis of strategic implications and actionable imperatives for stakeholders navigating technology, regulation, and trade complexities in solvent markets

In conclusion, the green and bio solvents landscape is at an inflection point driven by technological maturation, regulatory pressure, and evolving commercial imperatives. Adoption will be uneven across product classes and end-use industries, requiring tailored strategies that align technical performance with procurement and regulatory expectations. Trade policy developments have added complexity, emphasizing the importance of regional production capabilities and diverse sourcing arrangements. Nevertheless, companies that proactively integrate feedstock resilience, process innovation, and credible environmental validation are best positioned to capture early commercial wins and to influence formulation roadmaps.

Moving forward, stakeholders should treat sustainability credentials as a core commercial asset rather than a compliance obligation, investing in lifecycle transparency and technical validation to accelerate trust among downstream users. At the same time, agility in supply chain design and clarity in go-to-market segmentation will determine who secures strategic partnerships with formulators and industrial end users. The pathway to success combines near-term tactical moves-such as supplier qualification and tariff-sensitive sourcing-with longer-term investments in proprietary technologies and collaborative innovation models that de-risk scale-up and underpin market leadership.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Adoption of enzymatic green solvent processes to reduce chemical waste in pharmaceutical manufacturing
  • 5.2. Development of bio-based centrifugal solvent extraction for efficient oilseed processing
  • 5.3. Integration of membrane separation technology with bio-solvent recovery to enhance sustainability
  • 5.4. Scaling up of bio-based ionic liquids derived from lignocellulosic biomass for specialty applications
  • 5.5. Implementation of life cycle assessment frameworks for comparing bio solvent footprints across industries
  • 5.6. Partnerships between biotech startups and chemical manufacturers to commercialize algae-derived solvents
  • 5.7. Innovation in supercritical CO2 extraction for decaffeination and cannabis extraction processes
  • 5.8. Regulatory advancements incentivizing use of bio-based green solvents under EU REACH and US TSCA amendments
  • 5.9. Development of water-based solvent systems with enzymatic catalysis for zero-VOC cleaning products
  • 5.10. Increasing focus on circular economy models for solvent upcycling in battery recycling processes

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Alcohol Solvents
  • 8.2. Ester Solvents
  • 8.3. Glycol Solvents
  • 8.4. Ketone Solvents

9. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by Application

  • 9.1. Adhesives And Sealants
  • 9.2. Cleaning And Degreasing
  • 9.3. Coatings And Paints
  • 9.4. Pharmaceuticals And Personal Care
  • 9.5. Textile Processing

10. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by End Use Industry

  • 10.1. Automotive
  • 10.2. Consumer Goods
  • 10.3. Industrial Manufacturing
  • 10.4. Oil And Gas
  • 10.5. Pharmaceuticals

11. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by Source Technology

  • 11.1. Chemical Synthesis
  • 11.2. Enzymatic Synthesis
  • 11.3. Fermentation
  • 11.4. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction

12. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 12.1. Direct Sales
  • 12.2. Industrial Distribution
  • 12.3. Online Channels

13. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by Region

  • 13.1. Americas
    • 13.1.1. North America
    • 13.1.2. Latin America
  • 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 13.2.1. Europe
    • 13.2.2. Middle East
    • 13.2.3. Africa
  • 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by Group

  • 14.1. ASEAN
  • 14.2. GCC
  • 14.3. European Union
  • 14.4. BRICS
  • 14.5. G7
  • 14.6. NATO

15. Green & Bio Solvents Market, by Country

  • 15.1. United States
  • 15.2. Canada
  • 15.3. Mexico
  • 15.4. Brazil
  • 15.5. United Kingdom
  • 15.6. Germany
  • 15.7. France
  • 15.8. Russia
  • 15.9. Italy
  • 15.10. Spain
  • 15.11. China
  • 15.12. India
  • 15.13. Japan
  • 15.14. Australia
  • 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 16.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 16.3.1. Dow Inc.
    • 16.3.2. BASF SE
    • 16.3.3. Eastman Chemical Company
    • 16.3.4. LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
    • 16.3.5. Evonik Industries AG
    • 16.3.6. Solvay S.A.
    • 16.3.7. Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
    • 16.3.8. Clariant AG
    • 16.3.9. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
    • 16.3.10. Corbion N.V.
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제