시장보고서
상품코드
1836927

호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 검사 유형, 구성요소, 연령층, 기술, 검사 목적, 질환 유형, 최종사용자별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Respiratory Disease Testing Market by Test Type, Component, Age Group, Technology, Test Purpose, Diseases Type, End Users - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 181 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

호흡기질환 검사 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 6.10%로 104억 3,000만 달러로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 2024년 64억 9,000만 달러
추정 연도 2025년 68억 6,000만 달러
예측 연도 2032 104억 3,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 6.10%

현대 호흡기 검사 생태계와 진단, 제공 모델, 환자 니즈를 일치시키기 위해 조직이 해결해야 할 전략적 과제에 대한 틀을 제시합니다.

호흡기질환 검사 환경은 임상적 요구의 수렴, 기술 발전, 의료 서비스 제공 모델의 변화에 힘입어 급속한 진화의 시기를 맞이하고 있습니다. 본 소개에서는 입원, 외래, 재택에서의 검사 설계, 수행, 소비 방법을 재정의하는 원동력을 추출합니다. 이 보고서는 혈액검사, 영상 진단, 폐기능 평가에 걸친 진단 양식에 초점을 맞추고, 최신 워크플로우를 가능하게 하는 장비, 소모품, 소프트웨어 솔루션 간의 상호 작용에 초점을 맞추고 있습니다.

임상의와 검사실 관리자는 실용적인 결과를 얻기까지의 시간을 단축하고, 전자 의료 기록과 통합하고, 원격 모니터링 경로를 지원하는 진단 솔루션을 점점 더 많이 찾고 있습니다. 동시에, 지불자와 의료 시스템은 환자 관리의 효율성을 개선하고 조기 개입을 가능하게 하는 검사에 우선순위를 두고 있습니다. 이러한 압력은 분자진단 및 첨단 영상 분석의 기술적 성숙과 함께 발생하며, 이러한 기술들이 결합하여 의료 서비스 제공자가 이용할 수 있는 임상적으로 의미 있는 결과물의 범위를 확장하고 있습니다.

이 장에서는 이해관계자들이 답해야 할 핵심 질문, 즉 조달 및 R&D 우선순위를 환자 집단의 요구와 일치시키는 방법, 시약 및 장비 공급망의 복잡성을 관리하는 방법, 첨단 검사 기술을 대규모로 운영하는 방법에 대한 명확한 답을 제시합니다. 이후 더 깊이 있는 분석을 위한 맥락을 설정합니다. 이 책은 독자들이 구조적 변화, 관세의 영향, 세분화의 뉘앙스, 지역적 역학, 경쟁의 행동, 실행 가능한 전략 단계를 검토하는 후속 장들을 해석할 수 있도록 준비합니다.

임상 워크플로우를 재구성하는 분산화, 소프트웨어 통합, 전략적 파트너십을 통해 검사 패러다임을 재정의하는 업계의 중요한 변화

호흡기질환 검사 환경은 임상, 공급 아키텍처, 기술 역량 전반에 걸친 변혁적 변화로 인해 재편되고 있습니다. 변화의 주요 벡터 중 하나는 현장 진료와 재택 진단의 가속화로, 중앙 집중식 검사실에서 휴대성, 사용 편의성, 연결성을 요구하는 분산형 진료 환경으로 이동하고 있다는 점입니다. 이러한 분산화는 장기적인 모니터링에 중점을 두게 되고, 장기간에 걸쳐 반복적이고 부담이 적은 측정을 지원하는 기기나 검사법이 등장하게 됩니다.

동시에 알고리즘을 통한 이미지 분석과 클라우드 기반 판독 플랫폼으로 이미지 워크플로우가 강화되어 판독 타임라인이 단축되고, 판독 아웃소싱, 이미징 서비스(imaging-as-a-service)와 같은 새로운 서비스가 생겨나고 있습니다. 분자진단학은 임상적 폭과 기술적 견고성을 확장하고, 다중화 패널과 고감도 검출이 가능해져 조기 개입이 가능해졌습니다. 시약과 키트의 혁신은 여전히 차별화 요소이지만, 장비 제어에서 결과 해석 및 보고에 이르기까지 소프트웨어의 통합이 결정적인 경쟁 축이 되고 있습니다.

공급망의 견고성과 규제 정합성 또한 제조업체와 공급업체가 제품 설계와 시장 진입에 접근하는 방식을 바꾸고 있습니다. 기기 제조업체, 시약 공급업체, 소프트웨어 공급업체 간의 전략적 파트너십은 개별 구성요소가 아닌 통합된 솔루션을 제공함으로써 조달을 간소화하고 엔드투엔드 임상 워크플로우를 지원하기 위해 등장하고 있습니다. 이러한 변화를 종합하면, 적응력 있는 상업적 전략과 임상적 요구와 제품 로드맵의 긴밀한 연계가 요구됩니다.

최근 관세 정책이 진단 가치사슬 전반의 조달 전략, 조달 행동, 공급망 복원력을 어떻게 변화시켰는지를 종합적으로 평가합니다.

미국에서 시작된 관세 조치의 누적 효과는 호흡기 검사 공급망의 다양한 측면에 압력을 가하여 조달 결정, 조달 주기, 비용 구조에 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 진단 장비 및 소모품에 대한 수입 관세 변경은 제조업체와 유통업체가 제조 발자국 및 공급업체 다각화 전략을 재검토할 동기를 부여하고, 단일 국가에 대한 노출을 줄이기 위해 니어쇼어링(near-shoring)과 다지역 조달에 대한 검토를 가속화하고 있습니다. 이러한 역동적인 움직임은 근접성, 인건비, 컴플라이언스 비용, 신속한 시약 보충에 필요한 물류의 민첩성 사이의 트레이드 오프가 발생합니다.

이에 대응하기 위해 일부 벤더들은 육상 조립을 우선시하거나, 운송 관련 지연 및 관세 변동에 대한 리스크를 줄이기 위해 지역 생산기지를 확보하거나, 가격 변동 리스크를 헤지하기 위해 장기 공급 계약을 체결하는 등 다양한 노력을 기울이고 있습니다. 의료기관과 검사기관은 조달 리드타임을 늘리고, 가능한 한 공급업체를 통합하는 방식으로 대응하고 있습니다. 투명한 총소유비용 분석의 필요성이 가장 중요해졌으며, 이해관계자들은 이제 관세 관련 시나리오를 조달 평가 및 임상계획에 포함시켜야 합니다.

규제와 상환을 고려하면 관세의 영향은 더욱 복잡해집니다. 투입 비용의 증가가 검사 당 지출 증가로 이어질 경우, 규제 기관과 지불자는 임상적 유용성을 더 면밀히 검토할 수 있으며, 의료 제공자는 진료 경로를 분명히 개선하는 검사를 우선시할 수 있습니다. 따라서 기업들은 명확한 가치 내러티브, 업무상의 이점, 결과 개선 및 효율성 향상을 통해 비용 증가를 상쇄할 수 있는 근거를 통해 가격 조정을 정당화해야 합니다.

세부적인 세분화 관점을 통해 진단 제품의 디자인, 임상적 유용성, 상품화, 검사 방식, 기술, 최종사용자 간에 진단 제품의 디자인, 임상적 유용성, 상품화가 어떻게 조화를 이루어야 하는지를 밝힙니다.

부문 수준의 분석은 검사 유형, 구성요소, 연령대, 기술, 검사 목적, 질병 유형, 최종사용자별로 시장을 분석하여 전체 검사 생태계에서 차별화된 비즈니스 기회와 업무상 필수 사항을 파악할 수 있습니다. 검사 유형에 따라 생화학적 및 면역학적 측정이 가능한 혈액검사, 구조적 평가를 위한 흉부 X선 검사 및 컴퓨터 단층촬영을 포함한 영상검사, 호흡역학을 정량화하는 폐기능 검사가 주목받고 있습니다. 장비, 시약 및 키트, 소프트웨어의 성능과 시장 전략은 구성요소에 따라 크게 다르며, 장비는 자본 계획, 시약은 콜드체인 물류 및 로트 관리, 소프트웨어는 상호 운용성과 라이프 사이클 업데이트가 필요합니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 테스트 종류별

  • 혈액 검사
  • 영상 검사
    • 흉부 X선 검사
    • 컴퓨터 단층촬영
  • 폐기능 검사

제9장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 구성요소별

  • 기기
  • 시약과 키트
  • 소프트웨어

제10장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 연령층별

  • 성인
  • 노인
  • 소아

제11장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 기술별

  • 이미징 기술
  • 면역측정
  • 미생물학
  • 분자진단

제12장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 테스트 목적별

  • 진단
  • 모니터링
  • 예후
  • 스크리닝

제13장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 질병 종류별

  • 천식
  • 만성폐쇄성폐질환(COPD)
    • 만성 기관지염
    • 폐기종
  • 감염성 호흡기질환
    • 인플루엔자
    • 폐렴
    • 결핵
  • 폐암

제14장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 최종사용자별

  • 진단 검사실
  • 재택 케어 설정
  • 병원과 클리닉
  • 조사실

제15장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제16장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제17장 호흡기질환 검사 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제18장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Abbott Laboratories
    • AstraZeneca PLC
    • Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
    • Biomerieux PLC
    • Charles River Laboratories
    • COSMED srl
    • Eurofins Viracor, LLC
    • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
    • Fujifilm Holdings
    • GE Healthcare
    • Koninklijke Philips N.V
    • Medtronic PLC
    • MGC Diagnostics Corporation by Caire Inc.
    • QIAGEN Group
    • ResMed
    • SDI Diagnostics, Inc.
    • Seegene Inc.
    • Seimens Healthineers AG
    • Thermo Fisher Scientific
KSM 25.10.21

The Respiratory Disease Testing Market is projected to grow by USD 10.43 billion at a CAGR of 6.10% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 6.49 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 6.86 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 10.43 billion
CAGR (%) 6.10%

Framing the modern respiratory testing ecosystem and the strategic questions organizations must address to align diagnostics, delivery models, and patient needs

The respiratory disease testing environment is undergoing a period of rapid evolution driven by converging clinical needs, technological advances, and shifting care delivery models. This introduction distills the driving forces that are redefining how testing is designed, delivered, and consumed across inpatient, outpatient, and home-based settings. It frames the report's focus on diagnostic modalities that span blood assays, imaging, and pulmonary function evaluation while highlighting the interplay between instruments, consumables, and software solutions that enable modern workflows.

Clinicians and laboratory managers are increasingly demanding diagnostic solutions that reduce time to actionable result, integrate with electronic health records, and support remote monitoring pathways. At the same time, payers and health systems are prioritizing tests that improve patient management efficiency and enable earlier intervention. These pressures are occurring alongside technological maturation in molecular diagnostics and advanced imaging analytics, which together expand the range of clinically meaningful outputs available to providers.

This section sets the context for the deeper analysis that follows by articulating the core questions stakeholders must answer: how to align procurement and R&D priorities with patient population needs, how to manage supply chain complexity for reagents and instruments, and how to operationalize advanced testing technologies at scale. It prepares readers to interpret subsequent chapters that examine structural shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, competitive behavior, and actionable strategy steps.

Critical industry transformations redefining testing paradigms through decentralization, software integration, and strategic partnerships that reshape clinical workflows

The landscape for respiratory disease testing is being reshaped by transformative shifts that cut across clinical practice, supply architecture, and technological capability. One primary vector of change is the acceleration of point of care and home-based diagnostics, which relocates testing out of centralized labs and into decentralized care settings that demand portability, ease of use, and connectivity. This decentralization is accompanied by stronger emphasis on longitudinal monitoring, which elevates devices and assays that can support repeated, low-burden measurements over time.

Concurrently, imaging workflows are being augmented by algorithmic image analysis and cloud-enabled reading platforms that compress interpretation timelines while creating novel services such as outsourced reads and imaging-as-a-service. Molecular diagnostics have expanded in clinical breadth and technical robustness, enabling multiplexed panels and high-sensitivity detection that informs earlier interventions. Reagent and kit innovation continues to be a differentiator, but the integration of software, from instrument control to result interpretation and reporting, is becoming a decisive competitive axis.

Supply chain resilience and regulatory alignment are also shifting how manufacturers and providers approach product design and market entry. Strategic partnerships between device makers, reagent suppliers, and software vendors are emerging to deliver integrated solutions rather than discrete components, thereby simplifying procurement and supporting end-to-end clinical workflows. Taken together, these shifts demand adaptive commercial strategies and closer alignment between clinical needs and product roadmaps.

Comprehensive assessment of how recent tariff policies have redirected sourcing strategies, procurement behavior, and supply chain resilience across the diagnostic value chain

The cumulative effect of tariff actions initiated in the United States has exerted pressure across multiple dimensions of the respiratory testing supply chain, influencing sourcing decisions, procurement cycles, and cost structures. Changes to import duties on diagnostic instruments and consumables have incentivized manufacturers and distributors to reassess manufacturing footprints and supplier diversification strategies, often accelerating exploration of nearshoring and multi-region sourcing to mitigate single-country exposure. This dynamic creates tradeoffs between proximity, labor and compliance costs, and the logistical agility needed for rapid reagent replenishment.

In response, some vendors are prioritizing onshore assembly or regional production hubs that reduce transit-related delays and exposure to tariff volatility, while others are negotiating long-term supply agreements that hedge pricing risk. Health systems and laboratories are reacting by lengthening lead times on procurement and by intensifying vendor consolidation efforts where feasible, seeking the predictability of bundled contracts even as they weigh the impact of higher landed costs. The need for transparent total cost of ownership analysis has become paramount; stakeholders must now incorporate tariff-related scenarios into procurement evaluations and clinical planning.

Regulatory and reimbursement considerations further compound the effects of tariffs. When elevated input costs translate into higher per-test expenditures, regulatory bodies and payers may scrutinize clinical utility more closely, and providers may prioritize tests that demonstrably improve care pathways. Consequently, companies will need to justify price adjustments with clear value narratives, operational benefits, and evidence that offsets cost increases through improved outcomes or efficiencies.

In-depth segmentation perspective revealing how diagnostic product design, clinical utility, and commercialization must align across test modalities, technologies, and end users

Segment-level analysis reveals differentiated opportunities and operational imperatives across the testing ecosystem when the market is parsed by test type, component, age group, technology, test purpose, disease type, and end user. Based on test type, attention is divided between blood tests that enable biochemical and immunologic readouts, imaging tests that include chest X-ray and computed tomography for structural evaluation, and pulmonary function tests that quantify respiratory mechanics, each of which addresses distinct clinical decision points and operational requirements. Based on component, performance and go-to-market strategies vary substantially for instruments, reagents and kits, and software, with instruments requiring capital planning, reagents demanding cold-chain logistics and lot management, and software hinging on interoperability and lifecycle updates.

Based on age group, clinical utility and product design must account for adults, geriatrics, and pediatrics, as each cohort presents unique sampling, compliance, and interpretative considerations. Based on technology, opportunities cluster around imaging technologies that deliver structural insights, immunoassays that offer targeted biomarker detection, microbiology platforms that support culture and organism identification, and molecular diagnostics that enable high-sensitivity nucleic acid detection. Based on test purpose, solutions differ markedly when oriented toward diagnosis, monitoring, prognosis, or screening, and product positioning must reflect the operational cadence and regulatory expectations inherent to each use case.

Based on disease type, product and service requirements align to clinical workflows for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with its chronic bronchitis and emphysema subtypes, infectious respiratory diseases spanning influenza, pneumonia and tuberculosis, and lung cancer where staging and molecular profiling are central. Based on end users, diagnostic laboratories, home care settings, hospitals and clinics, and research laboratories each have distinct purchasing models, integration needs, and staffing capabilities that affect adoption pathways and support models. This segmentation framework clarifies where vendors should prioritize product enhancements, clinical validation efforts, and tailored go-to-market messaging.

Regional dynamics and market entry considerations that determine adoption, regulatory navigation, and supply chain configuration across major global healthcare regions

Regional dynamics significantly influence regulatory pathways, reimbursement environments, supply chain decisions, and adoption rates for respiratory disease testing innovations. In the Americas, healthcare delivery models and payer structures create a strong emphasis on demonstrating clinical utility and operational efficiency, driving demand for integrated diagnostic solutions that reduce downstream costs and support value-based care agreements. In Europe, Middle East and Africa, heterogeneity in regulatory frameworks and procurement practices necessitates flexible market entry strategies, localized clinical evidence generation, and partnerships with regional distributors to navigate reimbursement variability and capacity constraints.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid adoption of digital health infrastructure and significant investment in local manufacturing capacity create fertile conditions for scale-driven approaches, with governments and private health networks actively supporting diagnostic modernization initiatives. Cross-regional considerations include the need to tailor product configurations to local laboratory capabilities, to provide multilingual software interfaces, and to ensure that logistics models accommodate diverse cold-chain and customs environments. Additionally, companies must anticipate regional differences in disease prevalence, screening priorities, and clinical practice patterns when developing clinical validation strategies and commercial rollouts.

Taken together, geographic realities inform not only market access tactics but also R&D prioritization and manufacturing placement. Successful players adopt a regionally nuanced playbook that balances global platform efficiencies with locally adapted commercialization and service models to accelerate adoption and sustain operations across heterogeneous markets.

Strategic competitive behaviors and partnership models that drive differentiation through integrated platforms, evidence generation, and service excellence

Competitive behavior among companies in the respiratory diagnostics space is characterized by a mix of product specialization, platform expansion, and strategic collaborations that aim to deliver more complete clinical workflows. Instrument manufacturers continue to invest in modular platforms that support both core testing capabilities and future assay expansion, while reagent and kit suppliers focus on robustness, supply consistency, and simplified handling to lower the operational burden on laboratories and point of care settings. Software providers are increasingly differentiating through advanced analytics, connectivity to electronic health records, and features that support remote monitoring and telehealth integration.

Partnerships between device makers and software firms are producing bundled offerings that reduce integration friction and present a clearer value proposition to hospitals and diagnostic networks. Concurrently, joint development agreements with clinical research organizations and academic institutions are being used to build evidence for new assay claims and to accelerate regulatory submissions. Service and aftermarket offerings, such as managed reagent programs and remote instrument diagnostics, have become important revenue streams and customer retention levers. Companies that can demonstrate end-to-end reliability, rapid support response, and a clear pathway for clinical adoption are more likely to secure long-term contracts with health systems.

To compete effectively, firms must balance investments in core technological excellence with pragmatic commercial execution, investing in field service capabilities, training programs for clinical staff, and outcome-oriented evidence generation that resonates with procurement and clinical decision makers.

Concrete strategic initiatives that industry executives can implement to strengthen adoption, resilience, and commercial value across diagnostic portfolios

Industry leaders seeking to accelerate growth and build defensible positions in respiratory testing should pursue a set of pragmatic, actionable steps that align product development, go-to-market strategy, and operational resilience. First, prioritize interoperability and data integration capabilities so that instruments and software can plug into existing hospital systems and reporting workflows; this reduces adoption friction and supports clinical decision making. Second, strengthen supply chain diversification by qualifying secondary suppliers, exploring regional production partnerships, and implementing inventory strategies that buffer against tariff and logistics shocks.

Third, invest in clinical evidence that ties test results to measurable care improvements and operational savings; health systems and payers respond to clear demonstrations of value through changed clinical pathways. Fourth, design product lines with modularity in mind so that customers can scale offerings by purchasing incremental capabilities rather than replacing capital equipment. Fifth, expand service offerings to include managed reagents, remote maintenance, and training that reduce the operational burden on end users and create recurring revenue streams. Finally, adopt flexible commercial models-such as outcome-linked pricing, subscription access to software, and bundled solutions-that match the capital and operational constraints of different end users.

These actions should be executed in a coordinated manner across R&D, regulatory, commercial, and supply chain functions to ensure consistent messaging and efficient delivery of value to providers and patients.

Transparent mixed methods research design combining stakeholder interviews, technical validation, and scenario analysis to underpin the respiratory diagnostics findings

The research approach underpinning this analysis blended structured primary research with rigorous secondary synthesis and iterative triangulation to ensure accuracy and relevance. Primary inputs included in-depth interviews with clinical leaders, laboratory directors, procurement professionals, and industry executives to capture firsthand perspectives on adoption barriers, workflow constraints, and purchasing criteria. These qualitative insights were complemented by technical discussions with product development and supply chain specialists to understand manufacturing realities, reagent handling requirements, and software integration challenges.

Secondary research encompassed review of regulatory guidance, clinical literature, and public policy documents to contextualize technology adoption and reimbursement frameworks. Data synthesis applied cross-validation techniques that compared manufacturer claims, clinical protocol expectations, and end-user operational constraints to build a coherent narrative about where innovation is translating into practice. The methodology also incorporated scenario analysis to illuminate how policy shifts, such as tariff changes and regulatory updates, might alter strategic choices for manufacturers and providers.

Limitations are acknowledged where proprietary contractual terms and confidential supplier arrangements restrict visibility; where possible, the analysis highlights risk factors and suggests information gaps for future primary inquiry. Overall, the methodology emphasizes transparency, stakeholder diversity, and methodological rigor to support defensible conclusions and actionable recommendations.

Synthesis of diagnostic ecosystem drivers and strategic priorities that leaders must address to capitalize on innovation while managing operational and policy risks

In conclusion, the respiratory disease testing landscape is transitioning toward integrated solutions that blend robust instrumentation, reliable reagents, and intelligent software to meet evolving clinical and operational needs. Decentralization of testing and the rise of longitudinal monitoring change the calculus for product design, favoring portability, connectivity, and ease of use. Tariff dynamics and supply chain considerations add another layer of strategic complexity, compelling organizations to rethink manufacturing placement, supplier relationships, and procurement practices to preserve cost-effectiveness and continuity of supply.

Segmentation analysis highlights that different test types, technologies, disease targets, and end users require distinct value propositions and commercialization approaches. Regional differences further necessitate tailored market access plans and localized evidence generation. Competitive differentiation increasingly rests on the ability to deliver end-to-end value through service models, clinical validation, and interoperable platforms. For stakeholders across the ecosystem, success will be determined by the agility to adapt product strategies to clinical workflows, the foresight to manage supply chain exposure, and the commitment to generate evidence that resonates with clinicians and payers alike.

The insights presented here are intended to inform strategic planning, guide tactical investments, and support cross-functional alignment as organizations navigate the complex and rapidly changing respiratory diagnostics environment.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Expansion of CRISPR-based point-of-care assays for rapid detection of respiratory pathogens
  • 5.2. Deployment of AI-driven algorithms for predictive respiratory infection risk assessment in clinical settings
  • 5.3. Adoption of telehealth-integrated home sampling kits enhancing remote respiratory diagnostics capabilities
  • 5.4. Growth of multiplex PCR panels targeting emerging airborne pathogen variants in hospital laboratories
  • 5.5. Rising use of wearable breath analysis devices for continuous monitoring of respiratory biomarkers in real time
  • 5.6. Implementation of cloud-connected testing platforms enabling real-time surveillance of respiratory outbreaks
  • 5.7. Increased development of paper-based lateral flow assays for low-cost respiratory virus screening in emerging markets
  • 5.8. Emergence of next-generation sequencing workflows for comprehensive respiratory microbiome profiling and pathogen discovery

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Test Type

  • 8.1. Blood Tests
  • 8.2. Imaging Tests
    • 8.2.1. Chest X-Ray
    • 8.2.2. Computed Tomography
  • 8.3. Pulmonary Function Tests

9. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Component

  • 9.1. Instruments
  • 9.2. Reagents & Kits
  • 9.3. Software

10. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Age Group

  • 10.1. Adults
  • 10.2. Geriatrics
  • 10.3. Pediatrics

11. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Technology

  • 11.1. Imaging Technologies
  • 11.2. Immunoassays
  • 11.3. Microbiology
  • 11.4. Molecular Diagnostics

12. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Test Purpose

  • 12.1. Diagnosis
  • 12.2. Monitoring
  • 12.3. Prognosis
  • 12.4. Screening

13. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Diseases Type

  • 13.1. Asthma
  • 13.2. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
    • 13.2.1. Chronic Bronchitis
    • 13.2.2. Emphysema
  • 13.3. Infectious Respiratory Diseases
    • 13.3.1. Influenza
    • 13.3.2. Pneumonia
    • 13.3.3. Tuberculosis
  • 13.4. Lung Cancer

14. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by End Users

  • 14.1. Diagnostic Laboratories
  • 14.2. Home Care Settings
  • 14.3. Hospitals & Clinics
  • 14.4. Research Laboratories

15. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Region

  • 15.1. Americas
    • 15.1.1. North America
    • 15.1.2. Latin America
  • 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 15.2.1. Europe
    • 15.2.2. Middle East
    • 15.2.3. Africa
  • 15.3. Asia-Pacific

16. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Group

  • 16.1. ASEAN
  • 16.2. GCC
  • 16.3. European Union
  • 16.4. BRICS
  • 16.5. G7
  • 16.6. NATO

17. Respiratory Disease Testing Market, by Country

  • 17.1. United States
  • 17.2. Canada
  • 17.3. Mexico
  • 17.4. Brazil
  • 17.5. United Kingdom
  • 17.6. Germany
  • 17.7. France
  • 17.8. Russia
  • 17.9. Italy
  • 17.10. Spain
  • 17.11. China
  • 17.12. India
  • 17.13. Japan
  • 17.14. Australia
  • 17.15. South Korea

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 18.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 18.3.1. Abbott Laboratories
    • 18.3.2. AstraZeneca PLC
    • 18.3.3. Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 18.3.4. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
    • 18.3.5. Biomerieux PLC
    • 18.3.6. Charles River Laboratories
    • 18.3.7. COSMED srl
    • 18.3.8. Eurofins Viracor, LLC
    • 18.3.9. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
    • 18.3.10. Fujifilm Holdings
    • 18.3.11. GE Healthcare
    • 18.3.12. Koninklijke Philips N.V
    • 18.3.13. Medtronic PLC
    • 18.3.14. MGC Diagnostics Corporation by Caire Inc.
    • 18.3.15. QIAGEN Group
    • 18.3.16. ResMed
    • 18.3.17. SDI Diagnostics, Inc.
    • 18.3.18. Seegene Inc.
    • 18.3.19. Seimens Healthineers AG
    • 18.3.20. Thermo Fisher Scientific
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제