CCUS 흡수 시장 : 기술별, 용제 유형별, 최종 용도별, 산업별, 플랜트 규모별, 프로젝트 단계별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

The CCUS Absorption Market is projected to grow by USD 5,560.47 million at a CAGR of 26.83% by 2032.

A strategic orientation to absorption-based carbon capture that bridges solvent science, process engineering, and policy incentives to inform deployment decisions and partnerships

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) absorption technologies are central to near- and long-term decarbonization strategies across heavy industry, power, and hydrocarbon value chains. The field converges advances in solvent chemistry, process integration, and materials engineering with policy drivers, financing instruments, and evolving supply chains. As emission reduction commitments intensify, absorption-based capture solutions remain among the most mature technical approaches for separating CO2 from point sources, enabling either permanent storage or productive reuse in industrial processes.

The discipline is simultaneously technical and strategic: technical because solvent selection, absorber design, and thermal management determine operational cost and energy penalty; strategic because deployment depends on regulatory clarity, carbon pricing, and the availability of transport and storage infrastructure. This introduction frames the report's focus on absorption processes by emphasizing how incremental innovations and systemic shifts in policy and tariffs are jointly reshaping deployment timelines, capital allocation, and commercial partnerships across sectors.

How concurrent advances in solvent science, process modularization, supportive policy frameworks, and evolving commercial models are accelerating CCUS absorption deployment

The landscape for absorption-based CCUS is undergoing transformative realignment driven by technological maturation, policy recalibration, and evolving commercial models. First, solvent innovation and process intensification are reducing parasitic energy loads and improving per-unit capture efficiency, which in turn raises the feasibility of retrofits on existing assets. Concurrently, modularization and factory-built components are shortening project schedules and lowering site labor requirements, enabling smaller-scale implementations that were previously uneconomical.

Policy momentum has shifted from conceptual frameworks to executable mechanisms, with governments and industry consortia increasingly offering multi-year incentives, contracts-for-difference, and tax credits tied directly to captured CO2 volumes and verified storage. These instruments are changing the risk allocation between developers, host sites, and investors, encouraging larger offtake commitments and integrated hub development. On the commercial front, new collaboration models are emerging in which technology licensors, solvent suppliers, and infrastructure developers co-invest to accelerate first-of-a-kind projects and derisk subsequent replications.

Finally, the supply chain for critical equipment and engineered systems is diversifying. Fabrication capacity is expanding in multiple regions, while service providers scale remote monitoring and digital twin capabilities to optimize operations over asset lifecycles. Taken together, these shifts create a landscape where technical advances, supportive policy, and adaptive commercial structures reinforce each other to increase the pace and breadth of deployment.

Assessing the multifaceted repercussions of 2025 United States tariff measures on procurement, schedule risk, financing, and domestic supply chain emergence for CCUS projects

Tariff actions introduced in 2025 by the United States impose layered duties on specific imported equipment and materials used in CCUS projects, and their cumulative effects ripple through cost structures, procurement strategies, and project timelines. These tariffs have a multi-dimensional impact: they increase landed costs for foreign-made compressors, heat exchangers, and specialized metallurgy components, while also incentivizing onshore manufacturing and supply chain localization. The immediate consequence is pressure on capital budgets for projects relying on imported assemblies and bespoke components.

In response, developers and engineering firms are re-evaluating sourcing strategies and procurement timeframes. Some are accelerating orders for critical long-lead items placed prior to tariff implementation, while others are negotiating with domestic suppliers to requalify components and reduce exposure to duties. These adjustments often introduce engineering changes or qualification steps that can extend schedule risk for projects in late-stage development. At the same time, the tariffs have the unintended effect of stimulating investment in local fabrication capacity, which over a medium time horizon can reduce lead times and create more resilient regional supply chains for CCUS hardware.

From a finance and risk perspective, tariff-related cost inflation raises the importance of contract clauses that allocate duty risk and provide price escalation protections. Lenders and equity providers are incorporating these variables into due diligence, and procurement strategies increasingly include tariff contingencies and hedging approaches. Policy countermeasures, such as localized incentives for domestic content and targeted tariff exemptions for verified low-emission technologies, are emerging in certain jurisdictions to mitigate dislocation and preserve project viability. In aggregate, the 2025 tariff measures are reshaping how project teams approach procurement, contract architecture, and supply chain development, with implications that cascade into project selection and staging decisions across the sector.

Granular segmentation insights that map technology pathways, solvent chemistry distinctions, end-use integration challenges, and project scale and phase implications for CCUS absorption solutions

Segment-level dynamics reveal where technical, commercial, and regulatory pressures converge to influence project design and market opportunities. Based on technology, the market interplay among Oxyfuel Combustion, Post Combustion, and Pre Combustion pathways creates distinct solution sets for different emitters; Post Combustion remains dominant for retrofit applications and is differentiated by chemical absorption and physical absorption approaches, while Pre Combustion pathways leverage gasification and hydrogen separation for integrated hydrogen and CO2 management, and Oxyfuel presents opportunities where fuel combustion control and high-purity CO2 streams can simplify capture processes.

Examining solvent type shows a clear bifurcation between amine-based systems and potassium carbonate chemistries. Amine-based solutions are further partitioned by specific compounds such as Diethanolamine, Methyl Diethanolamine, and Monoethanolamine, each offering tradeoffs in regeneration energy, degradation resistance, and solvent management requirements. Within Monoethanolamine there is additional differentiation between advanced formulations designed for lower energy penalty and reduced volatility, and standard grades that prioritize simplicity and proven performance under established operating envelopes.

End-use segmentation highlights how capture objectives and integration complexity differ by application: Chemical Production requires tailored capture approaches for processes like Methanol Synthesis and Urea Synthesis where CO2 purity and continuity are critical for downstream reactions, Enhanced Oil Recovery demands transport and injection coordination with oilfield operators, and Gas Processing emphasizes capture configurations that align with gas treatment and dehydration systems. Industry segmentation sheds light on emitter-specific challenges; Cement presents limestone calcination as a unique point-source with high-temperature flue gas, Oil and Gas spans Downstream, Midstream, and Upstream contexts each with variable stream compositions and logistical constraints, Power Generation separates Coal Fired and Gas Fired operations with divergent flue gas compositions and retrofit pathways, and Steel differentiates between Blast Furnace and Electric Arc Furnace routes with distinct emission profiles and integration opportunities.

Plant size and project phase further refine commercial considerations: Large scale installations focus on economies of scale and integration with transport and storage hubs, while small scale plants emphasize modularity and lower capital intensity to serve distributed or niche emitters. Project phase classification into Operational, Planned, and Under Construction categories illuminates where technological maturity, operational experience, and lessons learned are concentrated, and where developer interest and capital formation are most active. These segmentation lenses collectively guide strategic choices around technology selection, partnership models, and phased deployment strategies for absorption-based CCUS initiatives.

Comparative regional dynamics shaping CCUS absorption deployment, infrastructure hubs, policy incentives, and industrial priorities across Americas, Europe Middle East Africa, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics strongly influence how absorption-based CCUS solutions are prioritized, funded, and commercialized. In the Americas, policy incentives and growing investment appetite have stimulated hub development, enabling project clustering around shared transport and storage infrastructure; regulatory frameworks are evolving to balance incentives with environmental oversight, and the private sector is actively aligning capital toward industrial clusters where capture can be coupled with utilization markets or long-term storage.

Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a heterogeneous policy landscape where progressive climate targets in some European markets drive early adopter projects and technical innovation, while resource-rich jurisdictions in the Middle East explore CCUS as a means to sustain hydrocarbon-based industries under decarbonization pressure. Infrastructure coordination and cross-border transport arrangements are particularly salient across this region, as is the role of public-private partnerships in financing first-of-a-kind projects.

Asia-Pacific presents a rapid scale-up imperative driven by industrial coal usage, steel production, and concentrated chemical manufacturing. National strategies increasingly emphasize localization of manufacturing and technology transfer, alongside state-supported pilots and strategic partnerships with international technology providers. Across all regions, the pace of hub formation, the availability of long-term storage sites, and the relative maturity of permitting processes determine where absorption technologies are prioritized and how quickly projects move from planning to operation.

How technology licensors, solvent manufacturers, EPC contractors, and service providers are structuring partnerships and capabilities to lead end-to-end CCUS absorption projects

Competitive dynamics in the CCUS absorption ecosystem are shaped by a mix of established energy conglomerates, engineering firms, solvent suppliers, and equipment fabricators, each bringing differentiated capabilities to project execution and lifecycle services. Leading technology licensors and solvent producers compete on the basis of process efficiency, solvent durability, and total cost of operation, while engineering, procurement, and construction firms emphasize integrated delivery models that reduce interface risk and accelerate commissioning. Equipment providers that can offer modular, factory-built units gain advantage where schedule compression and repeatability are prioritized.

Strategic partnerships and joint ventures are common as project developers seek to combine emission sources, transport networks, and storage capacity into viable commercial propositions. Service providers that offer comprehensive monitoring, verification, and reporting solutions add value by lowering compliance costs and improving stakeholder confidence. Meanwhile, new entrants are focusing on niche propositions, such as low-energy solvents, advanced membranes for pre-combustion separation, and digital process optimization tools that reduce operational expenditure. In this environment, firms that demonstrate end-to-end capabilities-from solvent R&D and pilot validation to full-scale integration and long-term operations support-are best positioned to capture leadership roles in multi-site deployments.

Practical, high-impact strategic actions for corporate and project leaders to de-risk deployment, secure supply chains, validate technology, and shape enabling policy for CCUS absorption

Industry leaders should adopt deliberate strategies that combine technical rigor, supply chain resilience, and regulatory engagement to accelerate cost-effective CCUS absorption deployment. First, organizations must prioritize technology selection based on a clear mapping of emitter characteristics, solvent performance under site-specific conditions, and integration complexity, thereby avoiding one-size-fits-all solutions and reducing retrofit risk. Concurrently, intentional sourcing strategies that diversify suppliers and qualify domestic fabrication options can mitigate exposure to tariff volatility and long-lead import risk.

Leaders should also invest in pilot and demonstration projects that de-risk scale-up while generating operational data to support financing and regulatory approvals. These pilots should incorporate robust monitoring protocols and life-cycle assessments to validate performance claims and build credibility with stakeholders. Strategic engagement with policymakers to shape incentive structures and secure predictable revenue streams is equally important; clear policy signals reduce investment uncertainty and enable multiyear contracting for offtake or storage services.

Finally, firms ought to cultivate multidisciplinary alliances-linking solvent chemists, process engineers, infrastructure developers, and finance specialists-to create vertically integrated offerings that simplify procurement for host sites. By combining technical excellence with adaptive commercial models and proactive policy engagement, industry leaders can both accelerate near-term deployment and lay the groundwork for scalable, lower-cost capture over the medium term.

Transparent and rigorous research methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature review, and process-level and supply chain analysis to validate absorption findings

This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence to present a rigorous view of absorption-based CCUS pathways. Primary input was gathered through structured interviews with technology developers, engineering firms, solvent producers, project developers, and regulatory stakeholders to capture operational insights and procurement practices. These qualitative inputs were triangulated against project documentation, technical papers, and peer-reviewed studies to validate performance characteristics, solvent behavior under field conditions, and integration challenges.

Secondary research included a systematic review of policy instruments, public procurement records, technical standards, and recent tariff announcements that influence procurement and project viability. The methodology applied process-level analysis to compare energy penalty, solvent degradation pathways, and retrofit complexity for major technology routes, while supply chain analysis assessed fabrication capacity, long-lead items, and regional manufacturing trends. Throughout, the approach prioritized transparency and traceability of sources, with sensitivity checks performed on assumptions related to equipment lead times, tariff pass-through, and policy incentive design to ensure robustness of the conclusions.

Synthesis and forward-looking implications highlighting the interplay of technical progress, policy design, and supply chain dynamics that will determine CCUS absorption uptake

This analysis reaffirms that absorption-based CCUS remains a pragmatic pathway for emissions mitigation across diverse industrial sectors, supported by ongoing advances in solvent chemistry, process integration, and project delivery models. The interplay between technological improvements and policy instruments will determine the speed and geographic distribution of adoption, while external factors such as tariff policies will continue to shape procurement strategies and domestic supply chain investments. As a result, organizations pursuing capture should adopt integrated planning that aligns technology choice, procurement timelines, and regulatory engagement to avoid schedule and cost surprises.

Looking forward, momentum will accrue where multi-stakeholder collaboration enables shared infrastructure, where policy frameworks provide predictable revenue mechanisms, and where scalable manufacturing and modular designs reduce unit costs. The path to widespread deployment is iterative: each operational project yields valuable performance data that informs subsequent designs and reduces execution risk. Stakeholders that combine technical discipline with strategic partnerships and proactive policy engagement will lead the transition from demonstration to mainstream application of absorption-based capture.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Scale-up of proprietary high-performance amine solvents to lower regeneration energy in industrial carbon capture
• 5.2. Integration of membrane contactors with absorption columns for enhanced CO2 mass transfer efficiency in power plants
• 5.3. Deployment of structured packing internals to optimize solvent distribution and minimize pressure drop in large-scale CCUS units
• 5.4. Development of dual amine-alkali solvent blends to improve amine stability and reduce solvent degradation rates
• 5.5. Adoption of digital twin technology for real-time monitoring and predictive optimization of absorption-based carbon capture systems
• 5.6. Implementation of hybrid cryogenic-amine capture trains to achieve higher CO2 purity for sequestration in saline aquifers
• 5.7. Commercialization of low-liquid loading absorbents to decrease equipment footprint and operational expenditures in industrial CCUS

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. CCUS Absorption Market, by Technology

• 8.1. Oxyfuel Combustion
• 8.2. Post Combustion
  • 8.2.1. Chemical Absorption
  • 8.2.2. Physical Absorption
• 8.3. Pre Combustion
  • 8.3.1. Gasification
  • 8.3.2. Hydrogen Separation

9. CCUS Absorption Market, by Solvent Type

• 9.1. Amine Based
  • 9.1.1. Diethanolamine
  • 9.1.2. Methyl Diethanolamine
  • 9.1.3. Monoethanolamine
    • 9.1.3.1. Advanced
    • 9.1.3.2. Standard
• 9.2. Potassium Carbonate

10. CCUS Absorption Market, by End Use

• 10.1. Chemical Production
  • 10.1.1. Methanol Synthesis
  • 10.1.2. Urea Synthesis
• 10.2. Enhanced Oil Recovery
• 10.3. Gas Processing

11. CCUS Absorption Market, by Industry

• 11.1. Cement
  • 11.1.1. Limestone Calcination
• 11.2. Oil And Gas
  • 11.2.1. Downstream
  • 11.2.2. Midstream
  • 11.2.3. Upstream
• 11.3. Power Generation
  • 11.3.1. Coal Fired
  • 11.3.2. Gas Fired
• 11.4. Steel
  • 11.4.1. Blast Furnace
  • 11.4.2. Electric Arc Furnace

12. CCUS Absorption Market, by Plant Size

• 12.1. Large Scale
• 12.2. Small Scale

13. CCUS Absorption Market, by Project Phase

• 13.1. Operational
• 13.2. Planned
• 13.3. Under Construction

14. CCUS Absorption Market, by Region

• 14.1. Americas
  • 14.1.1. North America
  • 14.1.2. Latin America
• 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 14.2.1. Europe
  • 14.2.2. Middle East
  • 14.2.3. Africa
• 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. CCUS Absorption Market, by Group

• 15.1. ASEAN
• 15.2. GCC
• 15.3. European Union
• 15.4. BRICS
• 15.5. G7
• 15.6. NATO

16. CCUS Absorption Market, by Country

• 16.1. United States
• 16.2. Canada
• 16.3. Mexico
• 16.4. Brazil
• 16.5. United Kingdom
• 16.6. Germany
• 16.7. France
• 16.8. Russia
• 16.9. Italy
• 16.10. Spain
• 16.11. China
• 16.12. India
• 16.13. Japan
• 16.14. Australia
• 16.15. South Korea

17. Competitive Landscape

• 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 17.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 17.3.1. Linde plc
  • 17.3.2. Air Liquide S.A.
  • 17.3.3. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • 17.3.4. Honeywell UOP LLC
  • 17.3.5. Shell plc
  • 17.3.6. BASF SE
  • 17.3.7. Fluor Corporation
  • 17.3.8. Aker Solutions ASA
  • 17.3.9. Carbon Clean Solutions Limited
  • 17.3.10. Carbon Engineering Ltd