시장보고서
상품코드
1870069

아크 용접 장비 시장 : 프로세스별, 장비 유형별, 최종 이용 산업별, 용접 재료별, 전류 유형별, 제품 유형별, 유통 채널별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Arc Welding Equipment Market by Process Type, Equipment Type, End User Industry, Welding Material, Current Type, Product Type, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 184 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

아크 용접 장비 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 7.06%로 136억 8,000만 달러 규모로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 2024년 79억 2,000만 달러
추정 연도 2025년 84억 9,000만 달러
예측 연도 2032 136억 8,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 7.06%

진화하는 재료, 자동화, 공급망 동향이 아크 용접 장비의 요구 사항과 산업 도입을 재정의하고 있음을 보여주는 권위있는 소개 편

아크 용접 장비는 현대 산업 생산에서 핵심적인 역할을 담당하고 있으며, 전통적인 제조 공정과 제조업을 재구성하는 급속한 기술 변화를 연결하고 있습니다. 용접 공정 및 장비 유형 포트폴리오는 자동차 제조에서 조선에 이르는 산업 전반에 걸쳐 합금의 복잡성, 구조 재료의 경량화, 접합부의 신뢰성 향상에 대한 요구에 부응하는 형태로 진화해 왔습니다. 생산 시스템이 고도의 자동화 및 디지털 제어를 채택함에 따라 용접 기술은 자본 비용과 생산성뿐만 아니라 통합 능력, 반복성, 데이터 기반 유지보수 측면에서도 평가되고 있습니다.

센서화, 자동화, 하이브리드 전원공급장치, 서비스화가 하나로 통합되어 아크 용접 장비의 생태계와 도입 패턴을 재구축하고 있는 상황을 중점적으로 분석합니다.

아크 용접의 상황은 단순한 제품의 점진적 개선을 넘어 용접의 사양 결정, 조달 및 도입 방법 자체에 변화를 가져오는 일련의 전환이 일어나고 있습니다. 센서 통합, 폐쇄 루프 제어 및 기계 학습의 발전으로 수동 조정 프로세스에서 동적으로 적응하는 용접 시스템으로 전환할 수 있게 되었습니다. 이 전환은 용접의 일관성을 높이고, 재작업을 줄이며, 예지보전 및 원격 진단의 기회를 창출하고, 다운타임 주기를 단축할 수 있습니다.

2025년 미국의 관세 부과가 용접 가치사슬 전체에 미치는 누적적 영향에 대해 조달 선택, 공급망 탄력성, 상업 전략의 관점에서 객관적으로 검토합니다.

2025년에 시행된 미국 관세 조치의 누적된 영향은 용접 장비 밸류체인 전반에 걸쳐 전략적 재조정을 촉발하여 조달 결정, 가격 전략, 공급업체 관계의 변화를 가져왔습니다. 관세로 인한 비용 압박으로 자본설비와 중요 소모품 모두에서 니어쇼어링과 지역 조달에 대한 검토가 가속화되고 있습니다. 조달 부서는 착륙 비용의 안정성과 기존 저비용 제조 거점과의 균형을 신중하게 고려했습니다. 이에 따라 일부 제조업체들은 무역 관련 혼란에 대한 노출을 줄이기 위해 재고 완충 장치를 강화하고 공급업체 기반을 다양화했습니다. 한편, 생산 연속성을 유지하기 위해 국내 또는 지역 공급업체의 인증을 앞당긴 제조업체도 있습니다.

공정, 장비, 재료, 현재 특성, 제품 형태, 유통 선택이 어떻게 차별화된 요구사항과 가치 제안을 촉진하는지에 대한 세부적인 분석에 대한 부문별 인사이트

부문 수준의 트렌드 분석을 통해 역량 투자, 유통 경로 결정, 제품 혁신이 차별화된 수익을 창출할 가능성이 가장 높은 영역을 파악할 수 있습니다. 공정 유형(금속 불활성 가스 용접, 플라즈마 아크 용접, 차폐 금속 아크 용접, 서브머지드 아크 용접, 텅스텐 불활성 가스 용접)의 차이는 조달 우선 순위에 영향을 미치는 고유한 성능 프로필과 장비 요구 사항을 생성합니다. 금속 불활성 가스 용접 제품군 내에서 플럭스 아크 용접과 가스 금속 아크 용접의 실용적인 차이점은 소모품 선택, 차폐 전략 및 접합부 준비 기준을 결정합니다. 각 서브 프로세스는 용접 속도, 작업자의 기술 요구 사항, 용접 후 처리에 영향을 미칩니다.

아메리카, 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카, 아시아태평양의 생산 및 공급 생태계의 수요 요인, 규제 영향, 경쟁 역학에 대한 전략적 지역 인사이트

각 지역별 동향은 제품 로드맵과 시장 진입 전략을 형성하는 고유한 기회와 경쟁 압력을 창출합니다. 아메리카 대륙의 경우, 기존 제조 기지, 에너지 인프라 프로젝트에 대한 지속적인 투자, 니어쇼어링에 대한 집중 강화가 결합되어 중장비 고정식 용접 시스템과 현장 수리를 위한 유연한 휴대용 솔루션에 대한 수요를 뒷받침하고 있습니다. 정책 전환과 산업 장려책은 현지 조달 전략을 촉진하고, 제조업체는 지역 서비스 네트워크와 애프터마켓 공급망을 강화해야 합니다.

포트폴리오 통합, 서비스 모델, 파트너십, 지속가능성 노력이 어떻게 경쟁 우위와 애프터마켓 가치를 형성하고 있는지, 주요 기업 전략적 인사이트를 보여줍니다.

주요 기업들은 포트폴리오 다각화, 채널 최적화, 하드웨어를 넘어선 역량 확장을 위한 전략적 파트너십을 결합하여 적응하고 있습니다. 소모품과 전원 공급 장치를 통합한 제품 라인을 보유한 기업은 번들 솔루션을 활용하여 애프터마켓 라이프사이클의 더 많은 부분을 확보하고 있습니다. 반면, 디지털 플랫폼을 중시하는 기업들은 상태 모니터링, 원격 진단, 소모품 보충 서비스를 통해 지속적인 수익을 창출하고 있습니다. 합병, 인수, 합작투자는 지역 유통 네트워크, 고유한 공정 노하우 또는 보완적인 소모품 화학 기술에 대한 접근을 얻기 위해 선택적으로 활용되고 있습니다.

제조업체와 유통업체를 위한 공급망 강화, 기술 도입 가속화, 서비스 혁신을 통한 지속적인 애프터마켓 수익 창출을 위한 실천 가능하고 영향력 있는 제안

업계 리더들은 새로운 고객 기대와 규제 환경의 현실에 맞게 운영 역량을 조정하기 위한 단호한 조치를 취해야 합니다. 공급망 다변화와 지역별 공급업체 선정에 우선순위를 두어 무역 혼란에 대한 노출을 줄이고 지역별 수요에 대한 대응력을 가속화합니다. 자동화 및 센서 장착 설비에 대한 투자는 공정의 안정성과 생산성을 향상시킬 뿐만 아니라 예지보전 및 부가가치 서비스 제공에 필요한 데이터를 생성합니다. 이러한 기술 투자에는 운영자와 기술자가 첨단 시스템에서 최대한의 가치를 이끌어 낼 수 있도록 기술 개발 프로그램이 함께 진행되어야 합니다.

1차 인터뷰, 기술적 검증, 2차 문헌 통합, 시나리오 분석을 결합한 견고하고 투명한 조사 방법을 통해 전략적인 인사이트를 뒷받침합니다.

본 조사 접근법은 정성적, 정량적 방법을 결합하여 업계 이해관계자들에게 견고성과 관련성을 보장합니다. 기술 관리자, 조달 책임자, R&D 전문가와의 1차 인터뷰를 통해 실무적 과제, 서비스 우선순위, 조달 판단 기준에 대한 인사이트를 얻었습니다. 2차 조사에서는 공개된 기술 문헌, 업계 단체 가이드라인, 표준 문서를 활용하여 공정 정의 및 재료 분류의 정확한 매핑을 보완했습니다.

기술, 공급망, 세분화, 지역적 이슈를 통합하여 아크 용접 장비의 경영 판단과 투자 우선순위를 도출하기 위한 결정적인 결론을 도출합니다.

이 결론은 아크 용접 장비 상황을 탐색하는 이해관계자들에게 핵심적인 시사점을 통합한 것입니다. 자동화, 센서 기술, 전원 공급 장치 설계의 기술 발전은 용접 품질 향상과 수명주기 비용 절감의 기회를 창출하고 있지만, 이러한 이점을 실현하기 위해서는 인력 역량과 디지털 통합에 대한 병행 투자가 필수적입니다. 2025년에 경험한 공급망 및 관세 압력은 지역 조달 및 공급업체 다각화의 중요성을 높이고, 기업이 제조 거점 및 유통 네트워크의 우선순위를 결정하는 방식에 영향을 미치고 있습니다.

자주 묻는 질문

  • 아크 용접 장비 시장의 2024년, 2025년, 2032년 시장 규모와 CAGR은 어떻게 되나요?
  • 아크 용접 장비의 기술 발전이 산업에 미치는 영향은 무엇인가요?
  • 2025년 미국의 관세 부과가 아크 용접 장비 시장에 미치는 영향은 무엇인가요?
  • 아크 용접 장비의 주요 시장 통계는 어떻게 되나요?
  • 아크 용접 장비의 공급망 다변화가 중요한 이유는 무엇인가요?
  • 아크 용접 장비 시장에서 주요 기업은 어디인가요?

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 프로세스별

  • 금속 불활성 가스
    • 플럭스 코어 아크 용접
    • 가스 메탈 아크 용접
  • 플라즈마 아크
  • 실드 메탈 아크
  • 서브머지드 아크
  • 텅스텐 불활성 가스

제9장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 기기별

  • 부속품
  • 소모품
    • 전극
      • 노출 전극
      • 피복 전극
    • 용가재
    • 가스
  • 전원장치

제10장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 최종 이용 산업별

  • 항공우주
  • 자동차
  • 건설
  • 에너지·전력
  • 일반 제조업
  • 조선

제11장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 용접 재료별

  • 철강
  • 비철금속
    • 알루미늄
    • 구리
    • 티타늄

제12장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 전류 유형별

  • 교류
  • 직류

제13장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 제품 유형별

  • 휴대용
  • 고정형

제14장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 유통 채널별

  • 직접 판매
  • 판매대리점
  • 온라인 판매

제15장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제16장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제17장 아크 용접 장비 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제18장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
    • Illinois Tool Works Inc.
    • ESAB Corporation
    • Fronius International GmbH
    • ABB Ltd.
    • Panasonic Corporation(Welding Systems Division)
    • Daihen Corporation
    • EWM AG
    • Kemppi Oy
    • Victor Technologies, LLC
KSM 25.12.01

The Arc Welding Equipment Market is projected to grow by USD 13.68 billion at a CAGR of 7.06% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 7.92 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 8.49 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 13.68 billion
CAGR (%) 7.06%

An authoritative introduction to how evolving materials, automation, and supply chain dynamics are redefining arc welding equipment requirements and industrial adoption

Arc welding equipment occupies a central role in contemporary industrial production, bridging traditional fabrication workflows and the rapid technological shifts reshaping manufacturing. The portfolio of welding processes and equipment types has evolved in response to higher alloy complexity, lighter structural materials, and a demand for improved joint integrity across industries from automotive manufacturing to shipbuilding. As production systems adopt greater automation and digital control, welding technology is increasingly judged not only on capital cost and throughput but also on integration capabilities, repeatability, and data-driven maintenance.

The supply chain for welding equipment and consumables is similarly adapting, with OEMs, distributors, and aftermarket suppliers recalibrating inventories and service models to support both high-mix, low-volume specialist applications and high-volume automated production lines. Equipment power sources and consumable chemistry are progressing in parallel, driven by a need for process stability, reduced post-weld processing, and compatibility with lightweight alloys. In this environment, safety, regulatory compliance, and operator ergonomics remain imperative, informing product design and training programs.

Transitioning from legacy systems to more flexible, digitally enabled equipment is a strategic imperative for manufacturers seeking productivity gains while managing cost and quality. The following sections outline the major transformational forces, segmentation nuances, regional dynamics, corporate strategies, and practical recommendations that industry leaders should weigh when aligning investment and market-entry plans with evolving demand patterns.

A focused analysis of how sensorization, automation, hybrid power sources, and servitization are collectively reshaping the arc welding equipment ecosystem and adoption patterns

The landscape for arc welding has experienced a sequence of transformative shifts that extend beyond incremental product improvements and into systemic changes in how welding is specified, procured, and deployed. Advances in sensor integration, closed-loop controls, and machine learning have enabled a move from manually tuned processes to dynamically adaptive welding systems. This transition enhances weld consistency and reduces rework, and it opens opportunities for predictive maintenance and remote diagnostics, thereby shortening downtime cycles.

Simultaneously, robotics and automation in welding cells have matured to accommodate complex joint geometries and mixed-material assemblies, enabling manufacturers to pursue designs that were previously impractical. Innovations in power source design and process hybridization-combining the strengths of multiple arc processes-are expanding the application envelope for welding in high-value sectors. Portable power sources and inverter technology improvements have increased energy efficiency while reducing equipment footprint, enabling field-service applications and modular production models.

On the consumables side, alloy-specific fluxes, tailored filler wires, and electrode coatings are being optimized to meet the demands of lightweighting and corrosion resistance, with secondary benefits in weld quality and operator safety. Meanwhile, distribution and service models are shifting toward outcome-based contracts and subscription services for consumable replenishment and equipment uptime, reflecting a broader industrial trend toward servitization. These shifts collectively demand a reorientation of product roadmaps, channel strategies, and workforce skills to capitalize on emerging opportunities.

A clear-eyed examination of the cumulative effects of the 2025 United States tariff landscape on sourcing choices, supply chain resilience, and commercial strategies across the welding value chain

The cumulative impacts of United States tariff measures implemented in 2025 have prompted strategic recalibrations across the welding equipment value chain, altering sourcing decisions, pricing strategies, and supplier relationships. Tariff-induced cost pressures accelerated consideration of nearshoring and regional sourcing for both capital equipment and critical consumables, as procurement teams weighed landed cost stability against legacy low-cost manufacturing footprints. In response, some manufacturers increased inventory buffers and diversified supplier bases to mitigate exposure to trade-related disruptions, while others accelerated qualification of domestic or regional suppliers to maintain production continuity.

Manufacturers of welding power sources and consumables reassessed their supply chain architectures, identifying opportunities to localize critical components and reevaluate long-term supplier contracts. Distributors and aftermarket service providers adapted by offering bundled solutions that include stockholding guarantees and flexible financing to smooth price volatility for end users. Price pass-through to end customers varied by sector; capital-intensive industries with long procurement cycles exhibited more resistance to short-term price movements, while lower-margin fabrication shops demonstrated greater sensitivity to consumable cost increases.

Tariff measures also influenced product strategy and R&D prioritization, as firms sought to reduce dependence on imported components through design for manufacturability and supplier consolidation. Compliance and administrative burdens increased for companies managing cross-border logistics, prompting investments in customs expertise and trade-compliance systems. Overall, the 2025 tariff environment reshaped competitive dynamics and accelerated structural adjustments that will inform sourcing and investment decisions over the medium term.

In-depth segmentation insights detailing how process, equipment, materials, current characteristics, product form factors, and distribution choices drive differentiated requirements and value propositions

Segment-level dynamics reveal where capability investments, channel decisions, and product innovations are most likely to yield differentiated returns. Process-type distinctions-spanning metal inert gas, plasma arc, shielded metal arc, submerged arc, and tungsten inert gas-create discrete performance profiles and equipment requirements that influence procurement priorities. Within the metal inert gas family, the practical differentiation between flux cored arc welding and gas metal arc welding drives consumable selection, shielding strategies, and joint preparation norms; each sub-process has implications for deposition rates, operator skill requirements, and post-weld treatment.

Equipment-type segmentation separates accessories, consumables, and power sources, and the consumables category itself subdivides into electrodes, filler wires, and gases. Electrode architecture, including choices between bare electrodes and covered electrodes, materially affects handling, storage, and application practices on the shop floor. End-user industry segmentation highlights the distinct drivers for aerospace, automotive, construction, energy and power, general manufacturing, and shipbuilding customers, with each sector weighing weld integrity, cycle time, and certification demands differently.

Material-based segmentation underscores the divergent welding metallurgy and process control needs for ferrous versus non-ferrous substrates, and within non-ferrous classifications the unique demands of aluminum, copper, and titanium. Current type considerations-alternating current and direct current-inform equipment selection, arc stability, and suitability for particular joint types. Product-type split between portable and stationary equipment influences purchasing decisions for field service versus fixed-line production, and distribution-channel variations among direct sales, distributors, and online sales determine how manufacturers build relationships, provide technical support, and manage aftermarket replenishment.

Strategic regional insights into demand drivers, regulatory influences, and competitive dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific production and supply ecosystems

Regional dynamics create distinct opportunity sets and competitive pressures that shape product roadmaps and go-to-market approaches. In the Americas, a combination of established manufacturing hubs, continued investment in energy and infrastructure projects, and a growing emphasis on nearshoring has supported demand for both heavy-duty stationary welding systems and flexible portable solutions for field repairs. Policy shifts and industrial incentives have encouraged local content strategies, prompting manufacturers to enhance regional service networks and aftermarket supply chains.

Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a mosaic of demand drivers, ranging from high-precision aerospace and automotive manufacturing in parts of Europe to large-scale infrastructure and energy projects across the Middle East and Africa. Regulatory emphasis on emissions and worker safety in many European markets has elevated interest in process optimization and lower-emission power sources, while the Middle East's capital projects favor robust, high-throughput submerged arc and plasma systems. Across the region, distributors and technical service partners play a pivotal role in bridging language, certification, and application expertise.

Asia-Pacific remains a major center of manufacturing scale and innovation, with growth in automotive electrification, shipbuilding, and renewables prompting increased adoption of advanced welding processes and automation. The region also hosts a dense supplier base for consumables and components, creating competitive pressures on price but also opportunities for collaborative R&D and rapid prototyping. Market entrants and incumbent suppliers alike must calibrate strategies to accommodate diverse regulatory environments, local certification regimes, and differing rates of automation adoption.

Key corporate strategic insights showing how portfolio integration, service models, partnerships, and sustainability commitments are shaping competitive advantage and aftermarket value

Leading firms are adapting through a combination of portfolio diversification, channel optimization, and strategic partnerships that extend capabilities beyond hardware. Companies with integrated consumables and power-source offerings are leveraging bundled solutions to capture more of the aftermarket lifecycle, while those emphasizing digital platforms are creating recurring revenue through condition monitoring, remote diagnostics, and consumable replenishment services. Mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures have been used selectively to gain access to regional distribution networks, proprietary process know-how, or complementary consumable chemistries.

Manufacturers that prioritize modular, software-enabled designs are better positioned to serve a broad array of end users, from high-precision aerospace fabricators to large-scale infrastructure contractors. At the same time, distributors and specialized service providers are differentiating on technical support, training, and inventory availability to reduce downtime and support certification requirements. Strategic investments in sustainability-such as energy-efficient power sources and low-emission consumables-are also gaining traction as buyers factor lifecycle environmental performance into procurement decisions.

Competitive positioning increasingly hinges on the ability to translate technical differentiation into accessible value propositions for diverse end users, balancing capital costs with total cost of ownership considerations and service-level commitments. Firms that can combine deep application expertise, robust supply chain capabilities, and flexible commercial terms are likely to strengthen customer relationships and defend margin in a more complex trading environment.

Actionable, high-impact recommendations for manufacturers and distributors to fortify supply chains, accelerate technology adoption, and capture recurring aftermarket revenue through service innovation

Industry leaders should take decisive steps that align operational capabilities with emerging customer expectations and regulatory realities. Prioritizing supply chain diversification and regional supplier qualification reduces exposure to trade disruptions and accelerates responsiveness to localized demand. Investing in automation and sensor-enabled equipment not only enhances process consistency and throughput but also generates the data necessary for predictive maintenance and value-added service offerings. These technology investments should be paired with skills development programs to ensure operators and technicians can extract full value from advanced systems.

Commercially, firms should evolve pricing and channel strategies to accommodate both direct enterprise accounts and smaller, digitally-served customers. Bundled offerings that include consumable replenishment, uptime guarantees, and remote diagnostics can capture recurring revenue and deepen customer relationships. On the product side, designing for modularity-where power sources and controls can be upgraded independently of mechanical assemblies-extends asset life and eases aftermarket support. Additionally, aligning R&D efforts with material trends such as lightweight alloys and corrosion-resistant steels will keep offerings relevant to high-growth applications.

Finally, companies should institutionalize trade compliance capabilities and scenario planning to respond quickly to tariff changes and regulatory shifts. Clear communication of lifecycle environmental performance, along with investments in lower-emission technologies, will bolster procurement credentials in sectors where sustainability mandates are increasingly influential.

A robust and transparent research methodology combining primary interviews, technical validation, secondary literature synthesis, and scenario analysis to underpin strategic findings

The research approach combined qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure robustness and relevance to industry stakeholders. Primary interviews with technical managers, procurement leads, and R&D specialists provided insight into practical application challenges, service priorities, and procurement decision criteria. Secondary research supplemented these perspectives with publicly available technical literature, trade association guidance, and standards documentation to ensure process definitions and material classifications were accurately mapped.

Triangulation methods were used to reconcile differing viewpoints across the value chain, including OEMs, distributors, and end users, and to validate assertions regarding technology adoption and supply chain shifts. Technical validation sessions ensured that distinctions among process types, current characteristics, and consumable chemistries were correctly represented. The methodology also incorporated scenario analysis to model the operational implications of trade policy changes and regional demand shifts, focusing on qualitative outcomes such as supplier diversification, inventory strategies, and product roadmaps.

Data integrity was maintained through cross-verification of interview findings against supplier literature and regulatory filings where applicable, while confidentiality safeguards protected proprietary input from participating organizations. This layered approach produces findings designed to support strategic planning, supplier selection, and investment decisions without relying on a single source of evidence.

A decisive conclusion synthesizing technological, supply chain, segmentation, and regional implications to guide leadership decisions and investment priorities in arc welding equipment

The conclusion synthesizes the core implications for stakeholders navigating the arc welding equipment landscape. Technological advances in automation, sensorization, and power-source design are creating opportunities to improve weld quality and reduce lifecycle costs, yet realizing these benefits requires parallel investments in workforce capability and digital integration. Supply chain and tariff pressures experienced in 2025 have heightened the importance of regional sourcing and supplier diversification, influencing how firms prioritize manufacturing footprints and distribution networks.

Segmentation analysis makes clear that differentiated strategies are necessary across process types, equipment forms, material classes, and distribution channels; a single product or commercial approach will not suffice across diverse end-user needs. Regional nuances further complicate strategy, as policy environments, certification regimes, and automation adoption rates vary significantly. Companies that align product modularity, service offerings, and regional supply capabilities with these differentiated requirements will be best placed to capture long-term value.

Ultimately, success in the current environment depends on integrating technical innovation with pragmatic commercial and supply chain strategies. Organizations that marry a clear understanding of process-level demands with agile sourcing, targeted channel management, and compelling aftermarket services will convert market complexity into competitive advantage.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Integration of IoT-enabled sensors in arc welding equipment for real-time process monitoring and optimization
  • 5.2. Adoption of AI-powered robotic welding cells with adaptive seam tracking in automotive assembly lines
  • 5.3. Emergence of low-fume, eco-friendly welding consumables to meet stringent environmental regulations
  • 5.4. Rising demand for portable inverter-based arc welding machines in remote and field maintenance operations
  • 5.5. Development of high deposition rate flux-cored arc welding systems for heavy structural fabrication
  • 5.6. Implementation of predictive maintenance platforms integrating cloud analytics for welding equipment uptime
  • 5.7. Growing use of pulse arc welding technology to control heat input in battery pack assembly manufacturing
  • 5.8. Integration of augmented reality welding helmets for real-time operator training and remote guidance

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Process Type

  • 8.1. Metal Inert Gas
    • 8.1.1. Flux Cored Arc Welding
    • 8.1.2. Gas Metal Arc Welding
  • 8.2. Plasma Arc
  • 8.3. Shielded Metal Arc
  • 8.4. Submerged Arc
  • 8.5. Tungsten Inert Gas

9. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Equipment Type

  • 9.1. Accessories
  • 9.2. Consumables
    • 9.2.1. Electrodes
      • 9.2.1.1. Bare Electrodes
      • 9.2.1.2. Covered Electrodes
    • 9.2.2. Filler Wires
    • 9.2.3. Gases
  • 9.3. Power Source

10. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by End User Industry

  • 10.1. Aerospace
  • 10.2. Automotive
  • 10.3. Construction
  • 10.4. Energy And Power
  • 10.5. General Manufacturing
  • 10.6. Shipbuilding

11. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Welding Material

  • 11.1. Ferrous
  • 11.2. Non Ferrous
    • 11.2.1. Aluminum
    • 11.2.2. Copper
    • 11.2.3. Titanium

12. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Current Type

  • 12.1. Alternating Current
  • 12.2. Direct Current

13. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Product Type

  • 13.1. Portable
  • 13.2. Stationary

14. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 14.1. Direct Sales
  • 14.2. Distributors
  • 14.3. Online Sales

15. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Region

  • 15.1. Americas
    • 15.1.1. North America
    • 15.1.2. Latin America
  • 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 15.2.1. Europe
    • 15.2.2. Middle East
    • 15.2.3. Africa
  • 15.3. Asia-Pacific

16. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Group

  • 16.1. ASEAN
  • 16.2. GCC
  • 16.3. European Union
  • 16.4. BRICS
  • 16.5. G7
  • 16.6. NATO

17. Arc Welding Equipment Market, by Country

  • 17.1. United States
  • 17.2. Canada
  • 17.3. Mexico
  • 17.4. Brazil
  • 17.5. United Kingdom
  • 17.6. Germany
  • 17.7. France
  • 17.8. Russia
  • 17.9. Italy
  • 17.10. Spain
  • 17.11. China
  • 17.12. India
  • 17.13. Japan
  • 17.14. Australia
  • 17.15. South Korea

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 18.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 18.3.1. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
    • 18.3.2. Illinois Tool Works Inc.
    • 18.3.3. ESAB Corporation
    • 18.3.4. Fronius International GmbH
    • 18.3.5. ABB Ltd.
    • 18.3.6. Panasonic Corporation (Welding Systems Division)
    • 18.3.7. Daihen Corporation
    • 18.3.8. EWM AG
    • 18.3.9. Kemppi Oy
    • 18.3.10. Victor Technologies, LLC
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제