시장보고서
상품코드
1870147

CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 업계별, 네트워크 유형별, 스펙트럼 유형별, 용도별, 조직 규모별, 프로바이더 유형별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market by Industry Vertical, Network Type, Spectrum Type, Application, Organization Size, Provider Type - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 189 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 27.03%로 6억 6,700만 달러 규모로 성장할 것으로 예측됩니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준 연도 2024년 9,834만 달러
추정 연도 2025년 1억 2,524만 달러
예측 연도 2032 6억 6,700만 달러
CAGR(%) 27.03%

프라이빗 LTE 및 5G 동향에 대한 명확한 개요. 공유 스펙트럼, 클라우드 네이티브 코어, 기업 혁신이 실제 네트워크 도입을 어떻게 형성하고 있는지를 보여줍니다.

공유 스펙트럼 정책, 클라우드 네이티브 아키텍처, 기업 디지털 전환의 융합은 조직이 프라이빗 무선 연결에 접근하는 방식을 재정의하고 있습니다. 다양한 산업 분야의 조직들은 업무 자동화, 실시간 분석, 새로운 종류의 IoT 기기를 지원할 수 있는 예측 가능하고 안전하며 고성능의 네트워크를 요구하고 있습니다. 이러한 배경에서 결정론적 연결성과 데이터 흐름의 로컬 제어의 필요성 때문에 중립 호스트 모델과 관리형 프라이빗 네트워크의 제공은 실험적인 파일럿 단계에서 핵심적인 상업적 전략으로 전환되었습니다.

스펙트럼 액세스 모델, 클라우드 네이티브 분산화, 프라이빗 5G의 성숙, 엣지형 기업 디지털화가 주도하는 시장 변화에 대한 심층 분석

프라이빗 무선 환경은 경쟁 역학 및 구현 접근 방식을 재구성하는 여러 가지 혁신적인 변화를 겪고 있습니다. 첫째, 스펙트럼의 민주화는 기존의 면허제 할당 방식을 넘어 공유 및 우선 접근을 가능하게 하는 새로운 프레임워크를 통해 조직은 전용 스펙트럼 구매에 따른 전체 비용과 리드타임 없이 기업 전용 연결성을 추구할 수 있게 되었습니다. 이를 통해 중립적 호스트 계약 및 업종별 관리형 서비스와 같은 창의적인 상업적 모델을 촉진하고, 스마트 팩토리, 캠퍼스 및 주요 인프라의 채택 곡선을 가속화하고 있습니다.

민간 무선 프로젝트의 공급업체 조달, 도입 일정, 총비용 관리에 대한 새로운 무역 관세가 누적적으로 미치는 영향에 대한 종합적 평가

2025년 미국에서 도입된 새로운 관세는 개인용 무선 공급망, 조달 전략, 도입 일정에 측정 가능한 파급 효과를 가져왔습니다. 특정 무선 장비 및 핵심 부품의 수입 비용이 증가함에 따라 장비 공급업체들은 조달 거점을 재평가하고 공급업체를 다변화하고 있습니다. 이에 따라 여러 벤더들이 리스크 감소를 위해 니어쇼어링과 공급업체 인증에 박차를 가하고 있습니다. 이로 인해 업무가 복잡해졌지만, 국내 제조 파트너십의 기회도 창출되었습니다.

상세한 세분화 분석을 통해 산업별 요구사항, 네트워크 아키텍처, 주파수 대역 선택, 애플리케이션 프로파일, 조직 규모, 공급자의 역할이 어떻게 차별화된 프라이빗 무선 전략을 형성하고 있는지를 파악할 수 있었습니다.

시장 세분화에 대한 인사이트는 기술적 선택과 조직적 우선순위가 사용 사례와 조달 모델마다 어떻게 다른 결과를 만들어내는지 보여줍니다. 산업별로는 교육, 에너지 및 유틸리티, 정부, 의료, 제조, 운송 및 물류 등 다양한 산업에서 수요가 발생하고 있으며, 각 산업은 고유한 서비스 수준 기대치와 컴플라이언스 제약을 가지고 있습니다. 교육기관 캠퍼스에서는 커버리지와 학생 안전 애플리케이션에 중점을 두고, 유틸리티에서는 그리드 내결함성 및 원격 모니터링에 우선순위를 둡니다. 정부 기관은 강력한 보안과 미션 시스템과의 상호 운용성을 요구하고, 의료 분야에서는 환자의 프라이버시 보호와 의료 등급의 신뢰성이 핵심입니다. 제조업에서는 자동화 및 로봇공학을 위한 초저지연이 요구되며, 운송 및 물류에서는 자산 추적 및 차량 관리를 위한 광역 커버리지가 필수적입니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 주요 요약

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 업계별

  • 교육
  • 에너지·유틸리티
  • 정부
  • 헬스케어
  • 제조업
  • 운송·물류

제9장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 네트워크 유형별

  • 프라이빗 5G
    • 비독립형
    • 독립형
  • 프라이빗 LTE

제10장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 스펙트럼 유형별

  • CBRS
    • Tier 1
    • Tier 2
    • Tier 3
  • 면허 스펙트럼
    • 고대역
    • 중대역
  • 비면허 스펙트럼

제11장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 용도별

  • 브로드밴드 액세스
  • 중요통신
  • 실내 커버리지
  • IoT 연결

제12장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 조직 규모별

  • 대기업
  • 중소기업

제13장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 프로바이더 유형별

  • 기기 벤더
  • 매니지드 서비스 프로바이더
  • 시스템 통합사업자
  • 통신사업자

제14장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제15장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제16장 CBRS 및 프라이빗 LTE/5G 네트워크 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제17장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson(publ)
    • Nokia Corporation
    • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
    • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    • ZTE Corporation
    • Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • NEC Corporation
    • Fujitsu Limited
    • CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
    • Airspan Networks, Inc.
KSM 25.12.01

The CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market is projected to grow by USD 667.00 million at a CAGR of 27.03% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 98.34 million
Estimated Year [2025] USD 125.24 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 667.00 million
CAGR (%) 27.03%

A clear introduction to private LTE and 5G dynamics showing how shared spectrum, cloud-native cores, and enterprise transformation are shaping real-world network deployments

The convergence of shared spectrum policies, cloud-native architectures, and enterprise digital transformation has redefined how organizations approach private wireless connectivity. Organizations across sectors seek predictable, secure, and high-performance networks that can support operational automation, real-time analytics, and new classes of IoT devices. Against this backdrop, neutral host models and managed private network offerings have moved from experimental pilots to core commercial strategies, driven by the need for deterministic connectivity and localized control over data flows.

Regulatory evolutions that enable shared and lightly licensed access have reduced barriers to entry for non-traditional network providers, while open ecosystem initiatives have diversified the supplier base and encouraged modular deployments. Enterprises are now evaluating trade-offs between private LTE and private 5G, balancing immediate operational requirements with long-term architectural flexibility. At the same time, edge compute and containerized cores are enabling workloads to run closer to the point of data generation, which improves latency and simplifies compliance with data residency constraints.

Importantly, industry adoption patterns are not homogeneous. The market is studied across Education, Energy & Utilities, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Transportation & Logistics, which exhibit distinct priorities around latency, coverage, security, and lifecycle costs. These vertical nuances shape procurement models and determine the degree to which organizations prefer vendor-managed services versus in-house controlled networks. Collectively, these forces are catalyzing a shift from trial-oriented proofs of concept to strategic, production-grade private wireless deployments that are operationally integrated with enterprise IT and OT systems.

Detailed exploration of the market shifts driven by spectrum access models, cloud-native disaggregation, private 5G maturation, and edge-enabled enterprise digitalization

The landscape for private wireless has experienced several transformative shifts that are reshaping competitive dynamics and implementation approaches. First, spectrum democratization has moved beyond traditional licensed allocations; new frameworks for shared and priority access have enabled organizations to pursue enterprise-dedicated connectivity without the full cost and lead time associated with exclusive spectrum purchases. This has encouraged creative commercial models, including neutral host agreements and vertical-specific managed services, and has accelerated the adoption curve for smart factories, campuses, and critical infrastructure.

Second, the rapid maturation of private 5G capabilities-particularly Standalone architectures-has expanded the addressable use cases by delivering stronger guarantees for quality of service, network slicing, and native support for massive IoT. Simultaneously, private LTE continues to provide a pragmatic path to reliable broadband and critical communications, often serving as a migration stepping-stone to 5G. These parallel tracks are creating hybrid network strategies in which organizations choose a phased approach: immediate value via LTE and incremental upgrades or coexistence with 5G as requirements evolve.

Third, the integration of cloud-native technologies and disaggregated network functions has reduced vendor lock-in and enabled more modular procurements. Open interfaces and virtualization have attracted software-centric suppliers and systems integrators, fostering ecosystems that accelerate innovation in orchestration, analytics, and security. As a result, total lifecycle considerations-such as interoperability, software updates, and multi-vendor management-have become central to enterprise procurement decisions.

Finally, the proliferation of edge compute and advanced device form factors is turning connectivity into a strategic enabler for operational transformation. Use cases that require sub-second response times, localized AI inference, or deterministic control loops are motivating investments in private network architectures. In turn, these capabilities are driving new sourcing models where telco operators, system integrators, and managed service providers collaborate more closely with industrial automation and OT vendors to deliver end-to-end solutions that bridge IT and OT domains.

Comprehensive assessment of the cumulative effects that new trade tariffs produced across supplier sourcing, deployment timetables, and total cost management in private wireless projects

The introduction of new tariffs in the United States in 2025 has had a measurable ripple effect across private wireless supply chains, procurement strategies, and deployment timetables. Increased import costs for certain radio and core components have led equipment vendors to reassess sourcing footprints and pursue greater supplier diversification. In response, several vendors accelerated nearshoring and supplier qualification efforts to reduce exposure, which created both operational complexity and opportunities for domestic manufacturing partnerships.

For enterprises, the tariff-induced cost pressures prompted renewed emphasis on total cost optimization. Procurement teams prioritized modular, software-driven capabilities that extend the usable life of existing hardware and enable over-the-air feature provisioning. At the same time, managed service providers and systems integrators adjusted commercial models to absorb some cost volatility, offering fixed-price bundles, multisite managed services, and pilot-to-scale transition frameworks that limit capital outlays while preserving predictable outcomes.

Device availability and component lead times were also affected, which influenced the rollout schedules for projects with large device fleets or specialized industrial endpoints. Some organizations deferred broader rollouts in favor of phased implementations that concentrated on high-value sites, using lessons learned to refine specifications and supplier governance before wider expansion. Meanwhile, regulatory coordination and procurement transparency gained renewed importance, as organizations sought to align contract terms with supply chain contingencies and to ensure compliance with evolving trade policies.

Overall, the tariff environment underscored the strategic imperative of resilient sourcing, flexible architectures, and stronger partnerships across the ecosystem. Enterprises that prioritized adaptability-through software abstraction, multi-vendor compatibility, and services-led models-were better positioned to navigate the cost headwinds while preserving the operational benefits of private wireless deployments.

In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how vertical demands, network architectures, spectrum choices, application profiles, organizational scale, and provider roles shape differentiated private wireless strategies

Insight into market segmentation reveals how technical choices and organizational priorities drive differentiated outcomes across use cases and procurement models. Based on Industry Vertical, the spectrum of demand spans Education, Energy & Utilities, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Transportation & Logistics, each bringing unique service-level expectations and compliance constraints. Educational campuses emphasize coverage and student safety applications, utilities prioritize grid resilience and remote monitoring, government entities require robust security and interoperability with mission systems, healthcare focuses on patient privacy and medical-grade reliability, manufacturing seeks ultra-low latency for automation and robotics, and transportation and logistics demand pervasive coverage for asset tracking and fleet orchestration.

Based on Network Type, enterprises are evaluating Private 5G and Private LTE options with distinct migration pathways. Private 5G is further studied across Non-Standalone and Standalone variations, where Non-Standalone often represents a staged adoption that leverages existing LTE cores, and Standalone represents a long-term investment in advanced 5G-native capabilities such as enhanced mobile broadband, network slicing, and ultra-reliable low-latency communications. Decision-makers weigh immediate operational readiness against future-proofing considerations when selecting between LTE-first deployments and direct Standalone 5G strategies.

Based on Spectrum Type, connectivity strategies consider CBRS, Licensed Spectrum, and Unlicensed Spectrum choices. The CBRS framework is analyzed across Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 access models, reflecting different priority and exclusivity profiles that influence design decisions and interference management. Licensed Spectrum assessments distinguish between High Band and Mid Band allocations, where Mid Band often offers a balance between coverage and capacity while High Band supports localized high-throughput scenarios. Unlicensed Spectrum maintains a role for low-cost, best-effort connectivity and private network augmentation without licensing overhead.

Based on Application, enterprises segment requirements into Broadband Access, Critical Communications, In Building Coverage, and IoT Connectivity, each of which imposes different network performance and management priorities. Broadband Access tasks prioritize sustained throughput and user density handling, Critical Communications demand deterministic behavior and redundancy, In Building Coverage targets consistent indoor performance and integration with building management systems, and IoT Connectivity focuses on scale, power efficiency, and device lifecycle management. These application-driven profiles inform radio planning, core architecture selection, and edge compute placement.

Based on Organization Size, procurement and operating models differ between Large Enterprises and Small And Medium Enterprises. Large Enterprises typically adopt multi-site, multi-technology strategies with dedicated IT/OT governance and in-house integration capabilities, while Small And Medium Enterprises favor managed offerings and simplified procurement paths that reduce operational complexity. These distinctions shape contract structures, financing approaches, and expectations for vendor-led support.

Based on Provider Type, the supplier ecosystem includes Equipment Vendors, Managed Service Providers, System Integrators, and Telecom Operators, each bringing different value propositions. Equipment vendors focus on radio and core innovation and compatibility; managed service providers offer operational scalability and lifecycle management; system integrators deliver vertical-specific integration and automation; telecom operators contribute spectrum management expertise, roaming capabilities, and commercial scale. The interaction among these provider types often determines the level of customization, speed of deployment, and long-term supportability.

Comparative regional analysis explaining how regulatory stances, operator participation, and industrial priorities across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific drive distinct private wireless approaches

Regional dynamics are central to how organizations approach private wireless planning, deployment, and vendor selection. In the Americas, regulatory frameworks have advanced shared spectrum models that enable enterprise-led initiatives, and the presence of CBRS-like constructs has encouraged a variety of neutral host and managed solutions. This environment favors innovation in service models and device ecosystems, and it has encouraged partnerships among local operators, systems integrators, and industrial automation providers to deliver campus-scale and regional deployments.

In Europe, the Middle East & Africa region, regulatory diversity and national spectrum allocation processes create a more heterogeneous landscape. Some markets emphasize licensed spectrum and operator-led private networks, while others explore flexible access models to stimulate enterprise adoption. Additionally, privacy and data residency requirements influence architecture choices, particularly for sectors handling sensitive information. The EMEA region's broad industrial base and strong emphasis on standards compliance create opportunities for system integrators and equipment vendors that provide highly interoperable and secure solutions.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrialization and strong public-private collaboration have accelerated private network adoption in manufacturing hubs and smart city initiatives. Several economies in the region promote localized manufacturing and ecosystem development, which supports supply chain robustness and faster time-to-deployment. Moreover, mobile operators in Asia-Pacific are actively offering enterprise-tailored private network services at scale, often leveraging existing licensed holdings and deep integration with cloud and edge service partners. Across all regions, the interaction between regulatory stances, operator participation, and industrial priorities dictates whether enterprises pursue operator-hosted models, fully private deployments, or hybrid constructs that blend local control with carrier-grade services.

Strategic company-level insights highlighting how modularization, service-led offerings, partnerships, and vertical expertise determine competitive advantage in private wireless engagements

Competitive positioning among companies in the private wireless ecosystem centers on interoperability, vertical-specific expertise, software capabilities, and service delivery models. Equipment vendors are increasingly modularizing product portfolios to support multi-vendor environments, focusing on software feature sets that can be deployed on generic hardware and on validated integrations with common orchestration and analytics platforms. This shift reduces barriers for systems integrators and managed service providers to assemble tailored solutions for specific industry needs.

Managed service providers and system integrators have expanded their roles from installation-focused projects to comprehensive lifecycle partners. They now offer outcome-based contracts, remote operations centres, and continuous performance optimization, which align well with enterprises that lack the internal skills or scale to operate private networks. Telecom operators have responded by refining their enterprise offerings to provide hybrid options-combining licensed spectrum advantages, roaming, and broader national footprint with localized edge services that meet performance and data residency needs.

Strategic partnerships and alliances have become a common route to market, enabling companies to bundle connectivity, edge compute, security, and vertical applications. These collaborations allow suppliers to present end-to-end value propositions without assuming all functional responsibilities, while also accelerating time-to-market for sector-specific solutions. Firms that can demonstrate validated references, robust support frameworks, and clear upgrade paths between LTE and 5G are better positioned to win enterprise trust and long-term engagements.

Investment priorities among leading firms emphasize software-driven innovation, security hardening, and integration toolkits that simplify OT-IT convergence. Vendors that provide open APIs, automation for lifecycle operations, and pre-integrated stacks for key verticals create differentiation while reducing deployment risk for buyers. Ultimately, the companies that combine deep domain knowledge with operational delivery capabilities will capture sustained demand as enterprises scale their private wireless estates.

Practical and prioritized recommendations for enterprise leaders to secure resilient sourcing, embed security, align network outcomes to business objectives, and scale private wireless successfully

Industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, actionable measures to translate strategic intent into operational success. Start by establishing clear success criteria that map network performance metrics to business outcomes; this alignment ensures that technical specifications remain tethered to measurable improvements in productivity, safety, or customer experience. Next, prioritize architectural flexibility by selecting vendors and solutions that support multi-vendor interoperability, software upgrades, and phased migration paths from private LTE to private 5G Standalone when required.

Supply chain resilience must be a governance priority. Leaders should diversify component sourcing, include contingency clauses in procurement contracts, and leverage flexible financing models such as consumption-based pricing or managed services to mitigate capital exposure during periods of cost volatility. Concurrently, invest in cybersecurity and operational resilience by integrating identity management, segmentation, and edge-based security controls into the initial design. Security must be embedded, not bolted on, and policies should cover device lifecycle, patch management, and incident response plans that align IT and OT teams.

Cultivate a partner ecosystem that complements internal capabilities. System integrators, managed service providers, and specialized application vendors can accelerate deployments and assume operational burdens. Leaders should formalize partnership frameworks that specify responsibilities, performance SLAs, and escalation pathways. Additionally, run targeted pilot programs that validate use cases under realistic operational conditions and capture quantifiable benefits; lessons learned from pilots should inform procurement specifications and rollout sequencing.

Finally, invest in skills and change management to ensure that operational teams can manage and evolve the network. Build cross-functional teams that bridge IT, OT, security, and procurement; provide hands-on training and access to vendor support during the early operational phase. By combining clear business alignment with flexible technical architectures, resilient sourcing, robust security, and engaged partners, industry leaders can accelerate value realization from private wireless initiatives while minimizing operational risk.

Transparent and repeatable research methodology combining primary interviews, regulatory and technical analysis, pilot observations, and multi-disciplinary expert validation to ensure robust insights

The research methodology blends qualitative and quantitative techniques to produce an evidence-based, actionable analysis. Primary research components included structured interviews with enterprise IT and OT leaders, technical validation sessions with network architects, and discussions with supplier executives across equipment, integration, and managed service segments. These engagements provided direct insight into procurement preferences, operational challenges, and emerging technical requirements across multiple verticals.

Secondary research involved systematic reviews of regulatory documentation, technology white papers, standards bodies releases, and vendor product literature to map the evolution of spectrum frameworks, interface specifications, and deployment best practices. All secondary inputs were cross-referenced and triangulated with primary findings to ensure consistency and to resolve discrepancies. The methodology also incorporated use-case validation through site visits and controlled pilots to observe real-world performance characteristics and to capture practical constraints related to device ecosystems, coverage planning, and edge compute integration.

Analytical steps included capability benchmarking, scenario analysis for architecture choices, and supplier ecosystem mapping to identify common solution patterns and differentiators. The research employed rigorous data cleansing and normalization procedures to ensure comparability across sources, and experts with domain experience reviewed the analysis to validate assumptions and conclusions. This layered approach produced conclusions grounded in operational reality and informed by cross-industry perspectives.

Conclusive synthesis emphasizing the strategic stakes of deployment choices, the imperative for interoperability and security, and the pathway to scalable, production-grade private wireless implementations

Private wireless technologies are increasingly central to enterprise digital strategies, offering deterministic connectivity, improved security controls, and a platform for advanced automation and analytics. The interplay between spectrum policy, cloud-native architectures, and edge computing has created a fertile environment for both evolutionary and disruptive approaches to network design. Enterprises that adopt flexible architectures, cultivate resilient supply chains, and engage with ecosystem partners are best positioned to convert connectivity investments into measurable operational outcomes.

As organizations prioritize production-grade deployments over piecemeal proofs of concept, long-term success will depend on clear alignment between business objectives and technical roadmaps. Tactical choices-such as spectrum access models, migration strategies between LTE and 5G, and decisions about who operates the network-carry strategic implications for scalability, security, and maintainability. By embedding security by design, favoring interoperable solutions, and piloting high-value use cases first, enterprises can de-risk rollouts and accelerate time-to-benefit.

In closing, the trajectory of private wireless will be shaped by pragmatic enterprise adoption supported by adaptable vendor solutions and cooperative regulatory frameworks. Organizations that combine disciplined procurement, partner ecosystems, and a focus on outcomes will capture the greatest advantage as private wireless transitions from isolated projects to foundational infrastructure for the digital enterprise.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Integrating edge computing with CBRS enabled private 5G for real-time industrial automation
  • 5.2. Implementing network slicing in CBRS based private LTE systems for secure enterprise workflows
  • 5.3. Leveraging dynamic spectrum sharing enhancements to boost CBRS network reliability and throughput
  • 5.4. Designing open RAN architectures for interoperable private 5G deployments in multi vendor environments
  • 5.5. Deploying AI powered zero touch provisioning and self optimizing management in private CBRS networks
  • 5.6. Optimizing in building coverage through CBRS small cell densification and mmWave private 5G integration
  • 5.7. Establishing CBRS spectrum leasing platforms for dynamic enterprise access and secondary market trading
  • 5.8. Adopting virtualized core network functions and multi access edge computing for private LTE scalability

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Industry Vertical

  • 8.1. Education
  • 8.2. Energy & Utilities
  • 8.3. Government
  • 8.4. Healthcare
  • 8.5. Manufacturing
  • 8.6. Transportation & Logistics

9. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Network Type

  • 9.1. Private 5G
    • 9.1.1. Non Standalone
    • 9.1.2. Standalone
  • 9.2. Private LTE

10. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Spectrum Type

  • 10.1. CBRS
    • 10.1.1. Tier 1
    • 10.1.2. Tier 2
    • 10.1.3. Tier 3
  • 10.2. Licensed Spectrum
    • 10.2.1. High Band
    • 10.2.2. Mid Band
  • 10.3. Unlicensed Spectrum

11. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Broadband Access
  • 11.2. Critical Communications
  • 11.3. In Building Coverage
  • 11.4. IoT Connectivity

12. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Organization Size

  • 12.1. Large Enterprises
  • 12.2. Small And Medium Enterprises

13. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Provider Type

  • 13.1. Equipment Vendors
  • 13.2. Managed Service Providers
  • 13.3. System Integrators
  • 13.4. Telecom Operators

14. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. CBRS & Private LTE/5G Networks Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 17.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 17.3.1. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
    • 17.3.2. Nokia Corporation
    • 17.3.3. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.4. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    • 17.3.5. ZTE Corporation
    • 17.3.6. Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • 17.3.7. NEC Corporation
    • 17.3.8. Fujitsu Limited
    • 17.3.9. CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
    • 17.3.10. Airspan Networks, Inc.
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제