시장보고서
상품코드
1870162

위성통신 시장 : 컴포넌트별, 네트워크 통신 유형별, 분석 기술별, 위성 유형별, 주파수대별, 용도별, 최종사용자별 - 세계 예측(2025-2032년)

Satellite Telecom Market by Component, Network Communication Type, Analyzing Techniques, Satellite Type, Frequency Band, Application, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2032

발행일: | 리서치사: 360iResearch | 페이지 정보: 영문 197 Pages | 배송안내 : 1-2일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




■ 보고서에 따라 최신 정보로 업데이트하여 보내드립니다. 배송일정은 문의해 주시기 바랍니다.

위성통신 시장은 2032년까지 CAGR 8.66%로 759억 9,000만 달러 규모로 성장할 것으로 예측되고 있습니다.

주요 시장 통계
기준연도 2024 391억 달러
추정연도 2025 423억 4,000만 달러
예측연도 2032 759억 9,000만 달러
CAGR(%) 8.66%

다층적인 위성 별자리,구성 요소 혁신,서비스 모델 진화에 집중,현대 위성 통신 환경에 대한 전략적 접근

위성통신 산업은 기술 발전, 규제 프레임워크의 진화, 최종사용자 기대치의 변화에 따라 전략적 재구축의 단계에 있습니다. 이 보고서는 지상 네트워크와 우주 기반 서비스의 광범위한 생태계에서 다중 궤도별자리 및 고급 신호 처리와 같은 신기술의 위치를 포함하여 현재 상황에 대한 간략한 개요로 시작합니다. 기존 정지궤도(GEO) 플랫폼이 파괴적인 저궤도(LEO) 및 중궤도(MEO) 전개와 공존하면서 커버리지, 내결함성, 서비스 차별화를 확대하는 계층화된 아키텍처가 형성되고 있다는 점을 강조합니다.

기술 융합, 하이브리드 궤도 아키텍처, 수명주기 서비스 모델이 위성 통신에 전략적 변화를 초래하는 구조

위성통신의 정세는 기술적, 상업적, 운영적 힘이 수렴하고 서비스 설계와 제공 방식을 재정의하면서 그 양상을 바꾸고 있습니다. 안테나 설계와 저지연 변조 기술의 발전으로 시스템 성능이 향상되었고, 위성 제어 소프트웨어와 통신 프로토콜의 개선으로 GEO(정지궤도), MEO(중궤도), LEO(저궤도) 자산 간의 동적 자원 분배가 가능해졌습니다. 이러한 기술적 변화는 단일 궤도의 모놀리식 구축에서 밀도, 중복성, 지연에 민감한 용도를 우선시하는 하이브리드 아키텍처로의 전환을 가속화하고 있습니다.

위성 통신 사업자의 조달, 공급망 탄력성, 최근 관세 조치가 전략적 조달에 미치는 다층적 영향

2025년에 도입된 위성 관련 부품 및 서비스에 대한 관세 및 무역 조치는 다국적 공급업체, 통합업체 및 최종사용자에게 새로운 운영상의 복잡성을 가져왔습니다. 관세는 종종 직접적인 비용 조정으로 여겨지지만, 그 누적 영향은 조달 리드타임, 공급업체 다각화 전략, 플랫폼 현대화 경제성까지 확대됩니다. 이에 따라 각 기업은 공급망 재평가, 대체 공급업체 선정, 정치적, 상업적으로 실현 가능한 범위 내에서 핵심 제조 및 테스트 능력의 현지화를 가속화하고 있습니다.

부품, 통신 방식, 분석 방법, 최종사용자 요구 사항을 경쟁 포지셔닝로 연결하는 종합적인 세분화 분석

부품, 통신 방식, 분석 방법, 위성 등급, 주파수 대역, 용도, 최종사용자라는 렌즈를 통해 시장을 상세하게 분석하여 기회와 위험의 차별화된 벡터를 파악할 수 있습니다. 컴포넌트 역학은 하드웨어, 서비스, 소프트웨어의 상호 의존성을 강조합니다. 증폭기, 안테나, 모뎀, 트랜스폰더와 같은 하드웨어 영역은 통합, 유지보수, 운영 지원에 이르는 서비스 제공과 상호 작용합니다. 한편, 소프트웨어 생태계에는 위성 통신 제품군과 위성 제어 플랫폼이 모두 포함되어 있으며, 전체 스택에서 오케스트레이션을 가능하게 합니다.

지역 비교 분석은 규제 프레임워크, 산업 정책 선택, 인프라 성숙도, 세계 시장에서 차별화된 전략적 우선순위가 어떻게 추진되고 있는지를 밝힙니다.

위성통신의 지역별 동향은 규제 프레임워크, 산업 정책, 인프라 성숙도, 수요 구성에 따라 형성되며, 아메리카, 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카, 아시아태평양에서 각각 다른 전략적 우선순위를 만들어내고 있습니다. 미국 대륙에서는 활발한 상업 위성 활동과 성숙한 민간 부문 생태계가 미디어 전송에서 기업용 연결에 이르기까지 다양한 서비스를 지원하고 있으며, 새로운 위성 별자리 상용화와 민간 투자가 두드러지게 강조되고 있습니다.

주요 기업이 모듈형 플랫폼, 서비스 중심 전략, 밸류체인 전반의 전략적 제휴를 통해 경쟁 우위를 재구축하는 방법

위성통신 분야의 기업 전략은 제품 중심 모델에서 통합 솔루션과 장기적인 서비스 관계로 진화하고 있습니다. 주요 기업은 신속한 배포, 단계적 업그레이드, 수익화 가능한 서비스 계층, 소프트웨어 정의 페이로드, 엔드투엔드 오케스트레이션 기능을 지원하는 모듈형 하드웨어 플랫폼, 소프트웨어 정의 페이로드, 엔드투엔드 오케스트레이션 역량에 투자하고 있습니다. 기업은 위성 용량을 지상 네트워크 사업자, 클라우드 사업자, 분석 전문가와 결합하여 기업 및 정부 고객에게 어필할 수 있는 번들형 서비스를 제공하기 위해 파트너십과 제휴가 점점 더 중요해지고 있습니다.

경영진이 탄력성을 강화하고, 지속적인 서비스 매출을 창출하며, 기술 로드맵을 고객 요구에 맞게 조정할 수 있는 실용적이고 우선순위가 지정된 단계

업계 리더는 진화하는 위성 통신 분야의 복잡성을 극복하고 기회를 포착하기 위해 일련의 실천적 행동을 우선시해야 합니다. 첫째, 주요 부품공급처를 다변화하고, 가능하면 이중 조달 체제를 구축하며, 지역 제조 역량에 대한 투자를 통해 관세 및 무역 리스크를 완화함으로써 공급망 복원력을 강화합니다. 이는 보다 엄격한 재고 관리와 신속한 조달 조정을 가능하게 하는 유연한 계약 조건의 도입으로 보완되어야 합니다.

전문가와의 대화, 기술 문헌 검토, 부문별 분석이 결합된 투명한 멀티소스 조사 방법을 통해 실행 가능하고 검증 가능한 결과를 보장

이 조사는 1차 정보와 2차 정보를 통합하는 구조적이고 투명한 조사 방법을 통해 업계의 현재 관행과 이해관계자의 우선순위를 반영하도록 설계된 1차 정보와 2차 정보를 통합합니다. 1차 정보에는 업계 실무자, 기술 전문가, 조달 담당자와의 인터뷰를 통해 운영상 과제, 도입 촉진요인, 전략적 의도에 대한 질적 인사이트를 제공합니다. 2차 정보에는 기술 문헌, 규제 당국 제출 서류, 공개 정보 등이 포함되며, 검증 가능한 업계 사실과 최근 정책 동향과의 정합성을 보장합니다.

기술 발전과 규제 환경을 지속가능한 경쟁 우위로 전환하기 위한 전략적 요구를 강조하는 간결한 통합 분석.

누적된 분석에 따르면 위성통신 분야가 전환점에 도달했음을 알 수 있습니다. 기술 혁신, 상업 모델의 변화, 정책 동향이 교차하며 전략적 우선순위를 재구성하는 단계입니다. 하이브리드 궤도 아키텍처, 소프트웨어 정의 페이로드 및 지상 시스템의 발전, 고급 분석 기술의 통합이 결합되어 실용적인 응용 범위를 확장하고 새로운 수익화 경로를 창출하고 있습니다. 이러한 발전은 기술적 민첩성과 체계적인 운영 관행, 강력한 공급망을 결합할 수 있는 조직에 유리하게 작용합니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 방법

제3장 개요

제4장 시장 개요

제5장 시장 인사이트

제6장 미국 관세의 누적 영향 2025

제7장 AI의 누적 영향 2025

제8장 위성통신 시장 : 컴포넌트별

  • 하드웨어
    • 증폭기
    • 안테나
    • 모뎀/라우터
    • 트랜스폰더
  • 서비스
    • 통합 서비스
    • 유지보수 서비스
    • 운영 서비스
  • 소프트웨어
    • 위성통신 소프트웨어
    • 위성 제어 소프트웨어

제9장 위성통신 시장 : 네트워크 통신 유형별

  • 일방향 위성통신 링크 서비스
    • 방송위성 서비스
    • 무선 측위 위성 서비스
    • 우주 운영 서비스
  • 양방향 위성통신 링크 서비스
    • 고정 위성 서비스(FSS)
    • 모바일 위성통신 서비스(MSS)

제10장 위성통신 시장 : 분석 기술별

  • 도플러 시프트 측정
  • 고속 푸리에 변환(FFT)
  • GPS(Global Positioning System)
  • LIDAR
  • 멀티스펙트럴 및 초분광 이미징
  • 합성 개구 레이더(SAR)

제11장 위성통신 시장 : 위성 유형별

  • 정지 적도 궤도(GEO) 위성
  • 저지구 궤도(LEO) 위성
  • 중궤도 궤도(MEO) 위성

제12장 위성통신 시장 : 주파수대별

  • C밴드
  • Ka밴드
  • Ku밴드
  • L밴드
  • S밴드
  • X밴드

제13장 위성통신 시장 : 용도별

  • 방송
  • 통신
  • 내비게이션
  • 원격탐사

제14장 위성통신 시장 : 최종사용자별

  • 정부·군
  • 산업 분야
  • 미디어·방송
  • 통신
  • 운송·모빌리티

제15장 위성통신 시장 : 지역별

  • 아메리카
    • 북미
    • 라틴아메리카
  • 유럽, 중동 및 아프리카
    • 유럽
    • 중동
    • 아프리카
  • 아시아태평양

제16장 위성통신 시장 : 그룹별

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

제17장 위성통신 시장 : 국가별

  • 미국
  • 캐나다
  • 멕시코
  • 브라질
  • 영국
  • 독일
  • 프랑스
  • 러시아
  • 이탈리아
  • 스페인
  • 중국
  • 인도
  • 일본
  • 호주
  • 한국

제18장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 점유율 분석, 2024
  • FPNV 포지셔닝 매트릭스, 2024
  • 경쟁 분석
    • Airbus SE
    • Avantel Limited
    • BAE Systems PLC
    • Bharti Airtel Limited
    • Blue Origin Enterprises, L.P.
    • EchoStar Corporation
    • Eutelsat Communications S.A
    • General Dynamics Corporation
    • Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
    • Globalstar, Inc.
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • Intelsat S.A.
    • Iridium Communications Inc.
    • KT Corporation
    • L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
    • Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • Maxar Technologies Inc.
    • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
    • Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • ORBCOMM Inc.
    • Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
    • Reliance Industries Limited
    • RTX Corporation
    • Safran S.A.
    • SES S.A.
    • Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd
    • SKY Perfect JSAT Group
    • Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
    • Space Norway AS
    • Space42 PLC
    • Tata Communications
    • Telesat Corporation
    • Thales Group
    • The Boeing Company
    • Viasat, Inc.
KSA 25.12.17

The Satellite Telecom Market is projected to grow by USD 75.99 billion at a CAGR of 8.66% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 39.10 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 42.34 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 75.99 billion
CAGR (%) 8.66%

A strategic orientation to the contemporary satellite telecom environment highlighting layered constellations, component innovation, and service model evolution

The satellite telecommunications sector is undergoing a phase of strategic reinvention driven by technological advances, evolving regulatory frameworks, and shifting end-user expectations. This report opens with a concise orientation to the current landscape, situating emerging capabilities such as multi-orbit constellations and advanced signal processing within the broader ecosystem of terrestrial networks and space-based services. It highlights how legacy GEO platforms continue to coexist with disruptive LEO and MEO deployments, creating a layered architecture that expands coverage, resilience, and service differentiation.

As demand patterns diversify across broadcasting, navigation, communication, and remote sensing, stakeholders must reconcile investment in hardware, software, and services with operational imperatives for interoperability and lifecycle efficiency. The introduction outlines the interplay between component innovation-ranging from antennas and transponders to specialized satellite control software-and the service models required to monetize these capabilities. It also frames the principal strategic tensions that decision-makers face: balancing capital intensity with recurring revenue, integrating heterogeneous analyzing techniques, and navigating complex regulatory and trade environments.

This introduction establishes the analytical lens used throughout the report, focusing on practical implications for procurement, network design, and policy engagement. It sets expectations for subsequent sections that examine transformative shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation insights, regional dynamics, corporate strategies, and actionable recommendations for leaders charting a path forward.

How technological convergence, hybrid-orbit architectures, and lifecycle service models are driving a strategic transformation in satellite telecommunications

The satellite telecom landscape is being reshaped by converging technological, commercial, and operational forces that collectively redefine how services are designed and delivered. Advances in antenna design and low-latency modulation techniques have elevated system performance, while improvements in satellite control software and communication protocols enable more dynamic resource allocation across GEO, MEO, and LEO assets. These technical shifts accelerate the move from monolithic, single-orbit deployments toward hybrid architectures that prioritize density, redundancy, and latency-sensitive applications.

Commercially, the rise of two-way broadband services and mobile satellite solutions has expanded addressable markets beyond traditional broadcasting and government customers, attracting new entrants and partnership models focused on integrated hardware-plus-service offerings. At the same time, the adoption of sophisticated analyzing techniques such as synthetic aperture radar and multispectral imaging is creating high-value vertical applications in transport, agriculture, and environmental monitoring, requiring close alignment between payload capabilities and downstream analytics platforms.

Operational paradigms are also evolving, with increased emphasis on lifecycle services that combine integration, maintenance, and operational support to reduce total cost of ownership and accelerate time-to-service. These shifts heighten the importance of interoperable software stacks and modular hardware that can be updated in orbit or swapped across platforms. Together, these dynamics are fostering an environment where agility, partnership ecosystems, and adaptive regulatory engagement determine competitive advantage.

The multi-layered consequences of recent tariff measures on procurement, supply chain resilience, and strategic sourcing for satellite telecommunications players

The introduction of tariffs and trade measures affecting satellite-related components and services in 2025 has introduced new operational complexities for multinational suppliers, integrators, and end-users. While tariffs are often framed as a direct cost adjustment, their cumulative impact reaches into procurement lead times, supplier diversification strategies, and the economics of platform modernization. Firms are responding by reassessing supply chains, qualifying alternative vendors, and accelerating localization of critical manufacturing and test capabilities where politically and commercially feasible.

Beyond immediate cost considerations, tariffs influence innovation pathways by altering investment calculus for research and development that depends on global sourcing of specialized subsystems such as amplifiers and transponders. Organizations with vertically integrated manufacturing or established multi-regional supplier networks are better positioned to mitigate disruption, while smaller suppliers face heightened exposure to input volatility. The policy environment also affects contractual structures; customers increasingly demand clarity on tariff pass-through, force majeure implications, and escalation clauses to manage risk.

Strategic responses include intensified inventory planning, adoption of dual-sourcing for key hardware, and strengthened contractual frameworks between satellite operators and service integrators. Regulated sectors and government end-users are particularly attuned to these shifts, given mission-critical continuity requirements. Ultimately, tariffs have catalyzed a broader re-evaluation of resilience and sovereignty considerations that will influence procurement and deployment decisions well beyond the immediate tariff window.

A comprehensive segmentation-based synthesis connecting components, communication types, analytical techniques, and end-user requirements to competitive positioning

A granular view of the market through component, communication type, analyzing technique, satellite class, frequency band, application, and end-user lenses reveals differentiated vectors of opportunity and risk. Component dynamics underscore the interdependence of hardware, services, and software: hardware domains such as amplifiers, antennas, modems and transponders interact with service offerings spanning integration, maintenance and operational support, while software ecosystems include both satellite communication suites and satellite control platforms that enable orchestration across the stack.

Communication types delineate service architectures where one-way links support broadcasting, radio determination and space operations services, and two-way links underpin fixed satellite services and mobile satellite services that require robust backhaul and adaptive bandwidth management. Analyzing techniques such as Doppler shift measurement, FFT, GPS augmentation, LiDAR, multispectral and hyperspectral imaging, and synthetic aperture radar afford distinct capability sets for signal integrity, geolocation, and remote sensing applications, driving tailored payload and ground-segment configurations.

Satellite class comparison between GEO, LEO and MEO highlights trade-offs in latency, coverage footprint and operational complexity that shape use-case suitability. Frequency band selection across C, Ka, Ku, L, S and X bands further differentiates performance envelopes for throughput, weather resilience and regulatory allocation. Application-level distinctions across broadcasting, communication, navigation and remote sensing tie these technical choices to end-user needs, where government and military, industrial, media and broadcasting, telecommunications and transport and mobility customers demand varied service assurances and integration pathways.

A regional comparative analysis highlighting how regulatory frameworks, industrial policy choices, and infrastructure maturity drive differentiated strategic priorities across global markets

Regional dynamics in satellite telecommunications are shaped by regulatory frameworks, industrial policy, infrastructure maturity, and demand composition, yielding distinct strategic priorities across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, robust commercial satellite activity and a mature private sector ecosystem support a broad spectrum of services from media distribution to enterprise connectivity, with a pronounced emphasis on commercialization and private investment in new constellations.

Europe, the Middle East and Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where regulatory alignment, public-private partnerships, and strategic government initiatives influence adoption curves. Investment in remote sensing and regulatory cooperation for spectrum and orbital assignments are key levers in this region, alongside efforts to support localized manufacturing and reduce supply chain exposure. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid adoption of connectivity solutions, significant investment in both national and commercial satellite programs, and an active market for mobile and broadband services that leverage both GEO and emerging LEO deployments.

Across all regions, governments and major enterprises play pivotal roles in shaping demand for secure communications and resilient navigation services, and regional policy choices around spectrum allocation, trade, and industrial incentives materially affect how commercial strategies unfold. Coordination between multinational vendors and local stakeholders remains essential to align capabilities with region-specific operational and regulatory requirements.

How leading firms are reshaping competitive advantage through modular platforms, service-centric strategies, and strategic partnerships across the value chain

Corporate strategies in the satellite telecommunications sector are evolving from product-centric models toward integrated solutions and long-term service relationships. Leading companies are investing in modular hardware platforms, software-defined payloads, and end-to-end orchestration capabilities that enable faster deployment, incremental upgrades, and monetizable service layers. Partnerships and alliances are increasingly central as firms combine satellite capacity with terrestrial network operators, cloud providers, and analytics specialists to create bundled offerings that appeal to enterprise and government customers.

Competition is also being reframed by capital deployment strategies and operational efficiency initiatives. Firms that can optimize launch and in-orbit operations, while maintaining rigorous lifecycle support through integration, maintenance and operational service contracts, gain an edge in delivering consistent service levels. The ability to offer differentiated analytics through advanced imaging modalities and signal processing further enhances value propositions for sectors such as transport, agriculture, and environmental monitoring.

At the same time, mergers, strategic investments, and technology licensing are common mechanisms for scaling capabilities and accessing new markets. Corporate governance increasingly emphasizes compliance with export controls, cybersecurity standards, and supply chain transparency, reflecting stakeholder demands for resilient and responsible operations. Collectively, these trends shape a competitive environment where technological agility, partnership ecosystems, and robust service delivery are decisive.

Practical and prioritized steps for executives to strengthen resilience, unlock recurring service revenue, and align technological roadmaps with customer needs

Industry leaders should prioritize a set of pragmatic actions to navigate complexity and capture opportunity in the evolving satellite telecom domain. First, embed supply chain resilience by diversifying suppliers for critical components, establishing dual-sourcing where feasible, and investing in regional manufacturing capabilities to mitigate tariff and trade risk. This should be complemented by tighter inventory management and flexible contractual terms that allow for responsive procurement adjustments.

Second, accelerate the adoption of software-defined and modular hardware architectures that enable in-orbit reconfiguration and reduce the cost and time associated with upgrades. Coupling these architectures with integrated service offerings-spanning systems integration, predictive maintenance, and operational support-will unlock recurring revenue and deepen customer engagement. Third, align product roadmaps with advanced analyzing techniques and frequency band capabilities to deliver vertically tailored solutions for navigation, remote sensing, and communications customers, ensuring clear differentiation in value and performance.

Finally, proactively engage with regulators and standards bodies to shape spectrum allocation, interoperability protocols, and export controls. Building multi-stakeholder coalitions with terrestrial network operators, cloud providers and analytics firms will also accelerate market adoption and create defensible business models. Executed together, these actions form a cohesive strategy that balances innovation, resilience and commercial scalability.

A transparent, multi-source research approach combining expert engagement, technical literature review, and segmented analysis to ensure actionable and verifiable insights

This research synthesizes primary and secondary inputs through a structured and transparent methodology designed to reflect current industry practices and stakeholder priorities. Primary inputs include interviews with industry practitioners, technical experts, and procurement leaders, providing qualitative insights into operational challenges, adoption drivers, and strategic intent. Secondary sources encompass technical literature, regulatory filings, and public disclosures to ensure alignment with verifiable industry facts and recent policy developments.

Analysis proceeded through layered segmentation to connect component-level dynamics with communication architectures, analytical techniques, satellite classes, frequency allocations, application areas, and end-user requirements. Cross-validation steps included triangulating interview findings with documented program announcements and technical specifications, and reviewing implementation case studies to surface pragmatic lessons. Attention was given to supply chain and policy variables that influence procurement and deployment decisions, including trade measures and spectrum management frameworks.

Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on clarity of assumptions, traceability of qualitative assertions, and the avoidance of proprietary or restricted data sources. The methodology supports reproducibility of insights and is intended to equip decision-makers with a reliable foundation for strategic planning, vendor selection, and technology investment prioritization.

A concise synthesis highlighting the strategic imperatives for converting technical advances and regulatory realities into sustainable competitive advantage

The cumulative analysis underscores that the satellite telecommunications sector is at an inflection point where technical innovation, shifting commercial models, and policy dynamics converge to reshape strategic priorities. Hybrid orbital architectures, advances in software-defined payloads and ground systems, and the integration of sophisticated analyzing techniques are collectively expanding the scope of viable applications and creating new pathways for monetization. These developments favor organizations that can combine technological agility with disciplined operational practices and resilient supply chains.

At the same time, regulatory actions and trade measures materially affect procurement strategies and cost structures, prompting a renewed focus on localization, contractual clarity, and dual-sourcing. Regional differences in regulatory posture and industrial capability further influence how products and services are configured and marketed. Consequently, success will require an adaptive approach that blends technical excellence with proactive stakeholder engagement and flexible commercial arrangements.

In sum, the sector offers substantial opportunities for entities that can align modular technology roadmaps with targeted service offerings, while managing geopolitical and supply chain risks. Executives who prioritize resilience, partnership ecosystems, and customer-centric service design will be best positioned to convert emerging capabilities into sustainable competitive advantage.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. The rapid deployment of low Earth orbit mega-constellations transforming global connectivity
  • 5.2. Integration of 5G network capabilities with satellite backhaul for enhanced rural coverage
  • 5.3. Adoption of software defined satellite payloads to enable dynamic bandwidth allocation
  • 5.4. Emergence of satellite-enabled Internet of Things applications for asset tracking and monitoring
  • 5.5. Development of laser inter-satellite links to improve data throughput and reduce latency

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Satellite Telecom Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Hardware
    • 8.1.1. Amplifiers
    • 8.1.2. Antennas
    • 8.1.3. Modem/Router
    • 8.1.4. Transponders
  • 8.2. Services
    • 8.2.1. Integration Services
    • 8.2.2. Maintenance Services
    • 8.2.3. Operational Services
  • 8.3. Software
    • 8.3.1. Satellite Communication Software
    • 8.3.2. Satellite Control Software

9. Satellite Telecom Market, by Network Communication Type

  • 9.1. One-way Satellite Communication Link Service
    • 9.1.1. Broadcasting Satellite Services
    • 9.1.2. Radio Determination Satellite Service
    • 9.1.3. Space Operations Services
  • 9.2. Two-way Satellite Communication Link Service
    • 9.2.1. Fixed Satellite Services (FSS)
    • 9.2.2. Mobile Satellite Services (MSS)

10. Satellite Telecom Market, by Analyzing Techniques

  • 10.1. Doppler Shift Measurement
  • 10.2. Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)
  • 10.3. Global Positioning System (GPS)
  • 10.4. LiDAR
  • 10.5. Multispectral & Hyperspectral Imaging
  • 10.6. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)

11. Satellite Telecom Market, by Satellite Type

  • 11.1. Geostationary Equatorial Orbit (GEO) Satellites
  • 11.2. Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Satellites
  • 11.3. Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) Satellites

12. Satellite Telecom Market, by Frequency Band

  • 12.1. C-band
  • 12.2. Ka-band
  • 12.3. Ku-band
  • 12.4. L-band
  • 12.5. S-band
  • 12.6. X-band

13. Satellite Telecom Market, by Application

  • 13.1. Broadcasting
  • 13.2. Communication
  • 13.3. Navigation
  • 13.4. Remote Sensing

14. Satellite Telecom Market, by End-User

  • 14.1. Government & Military
  • 14.2. Industrial
  • 14.3. Media & Broadcasting
  • 14.4. Telecommunications
  • 14.5. Transport & Mobility

15. Satellite Telecom Market, by Region

  • 15.1. Americas
    • 15.1.1. North America
    • 15.1.2. Latin America
  • 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 15.2.1. Europe
    • 15.2.2. Middle East
    • 15.2.3. Africa
  • 15.3. Asia-Pacific

16. Satellite Telecom Market, by Group

  • 16.1. ASEAN
  • 16.2. GCC
  • 16.3. European Union
  • 16.4. BRICS
  • 16.5. G7
  • 16.6. NATO

17. Satellite Telecom Market, by Country

  • 17.1. United States
  • 17.2. Canada
  • 17.3. Mexico
  • 17.4. Brazil
  • 17.5. United Kingdom
  • 17.6. Germany
  • 17.7. France
  • 17.8. Russia
  • 17.9. Italy
  • 17.10. Spain
  • 17.11. China
  • 17.12. India
  • 17.13. Japan
  • 17.14. Australia
  • 17.15. South Korea

18. Competitive Landscape

  • 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 18.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 18.3.1. Airbus SE
    • 18.3.2. Avantel Limited
    • 18.3.3. BAE Systems PLC
    • 18.3.4. Bharti Airtel Limited
    • 18.3.5. Blue Origin Enterprises, L.P.
    • 18.3.6. EchoStar Corporation
    • 18.3.7. Eutelsat Communications S.A
    • 18.3.8. General Dynamics Corporation
    • 18.3.9. Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
    • 18.3.10. Globalstar, Inc.
    • 18.3.11. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 18.3.12. Intelsat S.A.
    • 18.3.13. Iridium Communications Inc.
    • 18.3.14. KT Corporation
    • 18.3.15. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
    • 18.3.16. Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • 18.3.17. Maxar Technologies Inc.
    • 18.3.18. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
    • 18.3.19. Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • 18.3.20. ORBCOMM Inc.
    • 18.3.21. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
    • 18.3.22. Reliance Industries Limited
    • 18.3.23. RTX Corporation
    • 18.3.24. Safran S.A.
    • 18.3.25. SES S.A.
    • 18.3.26. Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd
    • 18.3.27. SKY Perfect JSAT Group
    • 18.3.28. Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
    • 18.3.29. Space Norway AS
    • 18.3.30. Space42 PLC
    • 18.3.31. Tata Communications
    • 18.3.32. Telesat Corporation
    • 18.3.33. Thales Group
    • 18.3.34. The Boeing Company
    • 18.3.35. Viasat, Inc.
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제