안전 엣지 센서 시장 : 센서 유형별, 기술별, 설치 유형별, 용도별, 최종사용자별, 유통 채널별 - 세계 예측(2026-2032년)

The Safety Edges Sensors Market was valued at USD 915.84 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 996.53 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 10.52%, reaching USD 1,845.21 million by 2032.

Comprehensive orientation to contemporary safety edge sensor capabilities, integration priorities, and deployment contexts shaping infrastructure decision-making

Safety edge sensors are rapidly evolving from niche retrofit components into foundational elements of resilient infrastructure strategies, driven by the confluence of aging assets, heightened safety mandates, and advances in sensor technology. This introduction situates the reader in the current operational realities where reliable detection of edge drops, curb heights, structural vibrations, and tunnel air quality has become a priority for operators and agencies seeking to reduce incidents and extend asset life. The narrative begins by orienting stakeholders to the functional promise of contemporary sensor systems: continuous situational awareness, automated incident signaling, and data-rich inputs for predictive maintenance systems.

Beyond immediate field functions, these sensors contribute to broader system optimization when they are architected into networked environments that enable cross-domain analytics. As infrastructure managers adopt more digital approaches, sensor outputs are increasingly aggregated with traffic telemetry, environmental data, and maintenance logs to form composite decision-making tools. Consequently, the decision calculus for procurement, installation, and long-term maintenance must account for interoperability, modularity, and data governance alongside traditional performance characteristics such as detection accuracy and durability.

This introduction also highlights the importance of contextual deployment: sensors applied to bridges face different mechanical stresses and calibration requirements than those used for tunnel monitoring or curb-edge detection. Therefore, technology selection and integration strategies should be guided by a rigorous assessment of the operational environment, safety requirements, and lifecycle implications. With those considerations in mind, the remainder of this document explores the transformative shifts reshaping the landscape, the implications of evolving trade policy, segmentation-based insights, regional dynamics, competitive positioning, recommendations for industry leaders, and the methodology underpinning the analysis.

How converging advances in sensor modalities, communications, integration practices, and data governance are redefining infrastructure safety and operational resilience

The landscape for safety edge sensors is undergoing transformative shifts fueled by technological maturation, regulatory emphasis on proactive safety measures, and expanding system interoperability expectations. Advances in sensor modalities such as infrared and laser-based imaging have raised the bar on detection precision and environmental robustness, while evolving radar and ultrasonic techniques are enhancing performance in adverse weather and high-traffic conditions. At the same time, piezoelectric approaches continue to provide low-power, resilient monitoring options for vibration and structural health assessment. These technological evolutions are enabling a move from isolated point solutions to distributed sensing fabrics that feed centralized analytics platforms.

Concurrently, the emergence of wireless network technologies and low-power wide-area communications has reduced the friction associated with deploying sensors across large-scale civil assets. Wireless options such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and low-power mesh protocols facilitate flexible installation strategies and enable retrofit scenarios that were previously cost-prohibitive due to wiring and civil works constraints. Nevertheless, wired architectures using Ethernet and RS-485 remain important for high-throughput or mission-critical segments, particularly where latency and deterministic communication are prioritized.

Another shift concerns the lifecycle economics of infrastructure management. Stakeholders are increasingly evaluating sensor investments against the total cost of ownership, factoring in installation complexity, maintenance pathways, and the potential for sensors to reduce event-driven emergency repairs. This shift in perspective encourages the adoption of modular OEM integrations and plug-and-play retrofit kits that minimize downtime and standardize replacement procedures. Overlapping these technical and economic trends is a growing emphasis on data governance, privacy, and cybersecurity. As sensor networks transmit increasingly sensitive operational data, security architectures and robust encryption practices are becoming prerequisites for procurement, especially for entities operating across multiple jurisdictions.

Finally, there is a broadening of use cases beyond classical safety functions. Sensors originally designed for curb height or edge drop detection are being repurposed or integrated with other modalities for traffic management, incident detection, and environmental monitoring inside tunnels. This convergence is enabling more holistic asset management programs and is prompting vendors to develop multi-modal solutions that can address several infrastructure priorities through a common hardware and software stack. Taken together, these shifts are creating a market environment where innovation is rewarded not only for technical excellence but also for system-level integration, scalability, and security-focused design.

How evolving tariff regimes are influencing procurement resilience, supplier strategies, and product architecture choices across safety edge sensor supply chains

Trade policy and tariff changes can materially affect procurement strategies, supplier selection, and the competitive calculus that infrastructure owners and contractors use when sourcing safety edge sensors. Increased duties or import restrictions on electronic components and finished sensor assemblies can elevate landed costs and alter supplier behaviors, prompting a re-evaluation of local content, vendor diversification, and inventory strategies. In response, some stakeholders may prioritize suppliers with domestic manufacturing footprints or those that demonstrate vertically integrated component supply chains to shield projects from tariff volatility.

Importantly, the operational repercussions extend beyond unit price. Tariff-driven supply chain shifts can lengthen lead times, complicate warranty and spare-part provisioning, and force interim design compromises if alternative components are substituted to maintain price parity. These outcomes can create implementation risks for time-sensitive projects such as bridge retrofit windows and tunnel modernization works that depend on coordinated civil and electrical schedules. Moreover, procurement entities that operate under public-sector budgeting constraints may face additional administrative burdens when revising contracts or seeking approvals for revised expenditure profiles driven by tariff-induced cost increases.

To mitigate these dynamics, some market participants are accelerating efforts to localize assembly and component sourcing, or to structure long-term supplier arrangements that include price adjustment mechanisms tied to tariff changes. Others are exploring hybrid installation models that combine OEM integrated modules for new construction with retrofit-friendly plug-and-play kits for urgent repairs and pilot programs. Strategic inventory buildup, dual-sourcing strategies, and flexible contract terms are proving to be pragmatic responses as organizations seek to preserve project timelines and fiscal predictability.

Finally, tariff changes often incentivize innovation in product design that reduces dependency on subject-to-tariff components. For instance, modular design approaches and greater use of standardized, nonproprietary interfaces can make it easier to substitute locally sourced modules without redesigning entire systems. In this way, trade policy pressures can accelerate the adoption of architectural best practices that favor modularity, interoperability, and supply chain resilience, all of which contribute to more robust long-term programs for deploying safety edge sensors.

In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how sensor modalities, applications, technologies, installation types, end users, and distribution channels determine adoption and differentiation

Key segmentation insights reveal how technology choices, application requirements, installation methods, end-user profiles, and distribution pathways interact to shape competitive differentiation and adoption patterns. When assessing sensor type, it is essential to consider the trade-offs among infrared, laser, piezoelectric, radar, and ultrasonic options: infrared and laser provide high-resolution detection suitable for precise curb-height and edge-drop assessments; piezoelectric elements excel at vibration and structural health monitoring on bridges; radar and ultrasonic sensors offer robust operation in adverse weather and in dynamic traffic environments. As a result, multi-modal deployments that pair complementary sensor types are becoming common in deployments where environmental variability and reliability are critical.

Application-driven segmentation further clarifies deployment priorities across bridge monitoring, road safety monitoring, traffic management, and tunnel monitoring. Bridge monitoring requires dedicated capabilities for structural health and vibration monitoring, including long-term drift compensation and ruggedized mounting. Road safety monitoring emphasizes curb height detection and edge drop monitoring, where speed of detection and low false-alarm rates are paramount to prevent vehicle damage and loss of control events. Traffic management applications focus on incident detection, speed monitoring, and vehicle detection, demanding sensors that can integrate with traffic signal controllers and incident management platforms. Tunnel monitoring combines air quality monitoring with structural integrity monitoring, and sensors in these environments must conform to confined-space safety standards and provide reliable data under variable ventilation regimes.

Technology-based segmentation between wired and wireless options shapes installation economics and operational flexibility. Wired implementations using Ethernet and RS-485 are often preferred for installations requiring high bandwidth and deterministic communication, such as continuous video-derived analytics or centralized structural-health platforms. Conversely, wireless approaches with Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and ZigBee support rapid deployments, retrofit scenarios, and lower-cost network expansion, though they require careful attention to interference, security, and power provisioning. Installation type distinctions between OEM and retrofit influence procurement pathways and lifecycle planning. OEM solutions, including custom designs and integrated modules, are attractive for new infrastructure projects seeking embedded functionality and long-term maintenance plans. Retrofit strategies, encompassing on-site installation and plug-and-play kits, enable faster field upgrades and can minimize civil interventions for existing assets.

End-user segmentation across government agencies, infrastructure companies, and road contractors highlights how organizational objectives influence purchasing criteria. Federal and state agencies typically prioritize regulatory compliance, interoperability, and lifecycle accountability. Private infrastructure firms and public-private partnerships focus on return-on-investment, risk transfer, and vendor accountability. Civil contractors and maintenance services place greater emphasis on installation simplicity, modular replacement, and after-sales support to meet project schedules and maintenance SLAs. Distribution-channel segmentation that includes direct sales, distributor sales, and online channels such as e-commerce platforms and manufacturer portals affects accessibility and procurement velocity. Direct relationships enable bespoke solutions and tighter integration, distributors can provide regional support and inventory buffering, and online portals facilitate rapid procurement for standardized kit-based deployments. Together, these segmentation dynamics inform where vendors invest in product modularity, support networks, and contractual models to align with buyer expectations and installation realities.

How regional regulatory priorities, procurement practices, and infrastructure renewal imperatives across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific shape strategic go-to-market approaches

Regional insights shed light on how demand drivers, regulatory frameworks, and infrastructure renewal priorities vary across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, shaping the strategic calculus for vendors and procuring organizations. In the Americas, a combination of legacy infrastructure and focused federal and state programs prioritizing safety inspections and roadway resilience is driving interest in retrofit solutions and multi-modal sensing approaches. Procurement in this region often demands compliance with stringent safety standards and emphasizes long-term maintenance contracts, which favors suppliers offering robust warranties, local support networks, and modular replacement parts. Additionally, public procurement cycles and funding mechanisms influence project timing, incentivizing pilots and phased rollouts aligned with fiscal calendars.

Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization, cross-border infrastructure corridors, and rapid urbanization pockets create a multifaceted demand environment. In parts of Europe, high regulatory expectations for safety and interoperability push for sensor systems that can integrate with national traffic management centers and meet strict data protection standards. Meanwhile, in the Middle East, large-scale infrastructure investments and ambitious tunneling and roadway projects create opportunities for OEM-integrated solutions and turnkey installations for new construction. African markets exhibit a diverse set of needs, where cost-effectiveness, durability, and ease of maintenance are paramount given variable resource availability and climatic extremes.

In the Asia-Pacific region, a combination of high urban density, rapid roadway expansion, and aggressive infrastructure modernization programs is accelerating adoption of advanced sensor platforms. Countries prioritizing smart city initiatives often seek integrated solutions that serve both safety edge detection and broader traffic management objectives, creating demand for multi-functional devices and cloud-native analytics. At the same time, manufacturing capabilities and regional supply chains in Asia-Pacific can provide competitive advantages for vendors that can leverage local production to mitigate tariff exposure and shorten lead times. Across all regions, the interplay between local regulatory expectations, procurement practices, funding mechanisms, and climatic or operational conditions necessitates region-specific go-to-market strategies, localized support ecosystems, and flexible product portfolios that can be adapted to diverse deployment environments.

Competitive landscape analysis highlighting how product platforms, integration services, regional manufacturing, and maintenance offerings create strategic advantages

Competitive dynamics in the safety edge sensor market are characterized by a mix of established electronics suppliers, specialist sensor manufacturers, systems integrators, and emerging technology entrants focusing on multi-modal detection and analytics. Leading players compete not only on sensor performance metrics but also on integration capabilities, regional support infrastructure, and service offerings such as commissioning, calibration, and ongoing maintenance. Many companies are differentiating through platform plays that combine hardware with analytics suites and APIs to enable integration with third-party traffic management systems and asset-management platforms.

Strategic partnerships and channel expansion are common approaches for firms seeking to accelerate market penetration. Collaborations between sensor manufacturers and infrastructure contractors or systems integrators enable bundled offerings that simplify procurement and installation for large projects. Additionally, some vendors are investing in localized manufacturing or assembly to support regional procurement preferences and reduce exposure to import tariffs. Investment in R&D is also focused on improving power efficiency, environmental resilience, and modular hardware architectures that support both OEM and retrofit use cases. As a consequence, firms that can demonstrate a clear pathway to lower total lifecycle costs, faster deployment times, and robust data-security measures tend to be more successful in securing contracts with government agencies and large infrastructure companies.

Another competitive consideration is the provision of professional services and after-sales support. Maintenance services, rapid replacement programs, and field calibration capabilities are increasingly viewed as differentiators, particularly for clients managing critical assets with limited tolerance for sensor downtime. Vendors offering training, documentation, and local spares distribution gain a competitive edge in markets where operational continuity is essential. Finally, smaller innovators are introducing niche solutions that address specific pain points, such as low-cost plug-and-play kits for immediate hazard mitigation or specialized sensors for confined-space tunnel environments. These niche entrants can catalyze broader market shifts by proving new business models or performance thresholds that incumbent firms then adopt or adapt.

Practical strategic actions for vendors and integrators to optimize product modularity, supply chain resilience, service models, and regulatory engagement for scalable deployments

Industry leaders can accelerate adoption and strengthen market position by pursuing targeted actions that align product architecture, go-to-market models, and operational support with evolving customer priorities. First, design modular sensor platforms that permit mix-and-match deployment of infrared, laser, piezoelectric, radar, and ultrasonic elements to address varied environmental conditions and application needs. Modular architectures reduce time-to-deploy for platform upgrades and allow procurement teams to tailor systems to specific bridge, road, tunnel, or traffic management scenarios while protecting investments through backward-compatible upgrades.

Second, invest in both wired and wireless integration options, ensuring that products can be flexibly deployed in high-bandwidth wired configurations for mission-critical applications or in low-infrastructure wireless formats for retrofit projects. Prioritizing secure, standardized communication interfaces will ease system integration with traffic management centers and asset-management platforms. Third, develop comprehensive service bundles that encompass commissioning, field calibration, warranty extensions, and spare-part logistics to meet the operational continuity needs of government agencies, infrastructure companies, and road contractors. These services should be supported by regionally distributed teams or authorized partners to minimize downtime and ensure SLA adherence.

Fourth, pursue supply chain strategies that reduce exposure to tariff volatility. This can include localized assembly, diversified component sourcing, and strategic inventory management. Fifth, engage proactively with regulatory stakeholders and standards bodies to help shape interoperability and safety guidelines, thereby positioning products as compliant and future-proof. Sixth, prioritize data governance and cybersecurity by embedding robust encryption, secure boot processes, and access controls into devices and cloud interfaces to meet the increasingly stringent requirements of public-sector purchasers.

Seventh, tailor distribution strategies to customer segments by offering direct sales and customization for large infrastructure projects, while leveraging distributor networks and online platforms for standardized kits and retrofit solutions that need rapid procurement. Finally, allocate R&D resources to reduce power consumption, enhance environmental resilience, and lower overall lifecycle maintenance costs to improve procurement propositions in regions where maintenance budgets and climate challenges are primary constraints. Implementing these recommendations will help vendors and system integrators deliver solutions that are operationally practical, financially defensible, and aligned with long-term infrastructure resilience objectives.

Methodological framework combining primary interviews, technical validation, segmentation analysis, and scenario evaluation to generate evidence-based insights

The analysis behind this report integrates a multi-disciplinary research approach combining primary stakeholder engagement, technical validation, and secondary-source synthesis to ensure a robust and actionable evidence base. Primary research included structured interviews with a cross-section of procurement officers, infrastructure operators, systems integrators, and product engineering leads to capture firsthand perspectives on operational constraints, procurement preferences, and performance expectations. These conversations informed qualitative assessments of installation challenges, maintenance practices, and the practical trade-offs organizations make when selecting sensor types and deployment models.

Technical validation involved examination of product specifications, field trial reports, and installation case studies to assess sensor performance across environmental conditions, communication architectures, and integration scenarios. Where possible, lab test data and third-party validation reports were reviewed to corroborate vendor claims about detection accuracy, environmental resilience, and power consumption. Secondary research encompassed a review of regulatory guidelines, standards documents, infrastructure program plans, and technology whitepapers to contextualize procurement drivers and compliance considerations across regions.

Analytical methods included comparative evaluation across the segmentation axes of sensor type, application, technology, installation type, end user, and distribution channel. This segmentation-driven approach enabled identification of recurring patterns, such as the prevalence of wireless retrofit solutions in resource-constrained projects or the preference for wired, deterministic systems in mission-critical monitoring. Additionally, scenario analysis was used to explore how trade-policy shifts and supply chain disruptions could impact procurement decisions and product architecture priorities. Throughout the research process, triangulation techniques were applied to resolve discrepancies among sources and to highlight evidence-backed insights for decision-makers.

Finally, the study prioritized transparency in assumptions and limitations. Where data variability or evidence gaps were encountered, these were explicitly noted and factored into the level-of-confidence assessments accompanying key findings. The resulting methodology ensures that the insights and recommendations are grounded in a pragmatic understanding of field realities, technological constraints, and procurement dynamics that shape how safety edge sensors are deployed and maintained across diverse infrastructure contexts.

Synthesis of strategic imperatives emphasizing interoperable sensor design, supply chain resilience, and service-backed deployments to secure infrastructure safety outcomes

The conclusion synthesizes the strategic imperatives identified across technological capability, procurement practice, regional nuance, and competitive positioning into a concise rationale for prioritized action. Safety edge sensors are now central to holistic infrastructure safety strategies because they provide timely, actionable data that reduces incident risk and supports maintenance planning. The trajectory toward multi-modal sensing, modular product design, and integrated analytics is clear: stakeholders who invest early in interoperable, secure, and service-backed solutions will achieve superior operational continuity and clearer paths to cost-effective lifecycle management.

Moreover, the operational resilience of sensor deployments will increasingly depend on supply chain decisions and regional manufacturing strategies that mitigate tariff exposure and shorten lead times. Vendors that combine strong technical performance with flexible deployment models, localized support, and rigorous cybersecurity practices will be best positioned to capture demand across public and private procurement channels. For agency and contractor buyers, prioritizing modular systems that can be deployed as OEM integrations in new builds or as retrofit kits for existing assets will allow capital programs to scale more predictably and to adapt to changing safety requirements.

In summary, the convergence of improved sensing technologies, flexible communication architectures, and heightened emphasis on data governance is reshaping how infrastructure safety priorities are operationalized. By aligning product design, service models, and supply chain strategies with these trends, both suppliers and procuring organizations can realize measurable improvements in safety outcomes and asset longevity. The insights presented here are intended to guide strategic investment and operational planning so that sensor deployments become reliable, maintainable, and integral components of modern infrastructure management.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.5. Market Outlook
  • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Sensor Type

• 8.1. Infrared
• 8.2. Laser
• 8.3. Piezoelectric
• 8.4. Radar
• 8.5. Ultrasonic

9. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Technology

• 9.1. Wired
  • 9.1.1. Ethernet
  • 9.1.2. RS-485
• 9.2. Wireless
  • 9.2.1. Bluetooth
  • 9.2.2. Wi-Fi
  • 9.2.3. ZigBee

10. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Installation Type

• 10.1. OEM
  • 10.1.1. Custom Design
  • 10.1.2. Integrated Module
• 10.2. Retrofit
  • 10.2.1. On-Site Installation
  • 10.2.2. Plug-And-Play Kit

11. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Application

• 11.1. Bridge Monitoring
  • 11.1.1. Structural Health
  • 11.1.2. Vibration Monitoring
• 11.2. Road Safety Monitoring
  • 11.2.1. Curb Height Detection
  • 11.2.2. Edge Drop Monitoring
• 11.3. Traffic Management
  • 11.3.1. Incident Detection
  • 11.3.2. Speed Monitoring
  • 11.3.3. Vehicle Detection
• 11.4. Tunnel Monitoring
  • 11.4.1. Air Quality Monitoring
  • 11.4.2. Structural Integrity Monitoring

12. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by End User

• 12.1. Government Agencies
  • 12.1.1. Federal
  • 12.1.2. State
• 12.2. Infrastructure Companies
  • 12.2.1. Private Infrastructure Firms
  • 12.2.2. Public-Private Partnerships
• 12.3. Road Contractors
  • 12.3.1. Civil Contractors
  • 12.3.2. Maintenance Services

13. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Distribution Channel

• 13.1. Direct Sales
• 13.2. Distributor Sales
• 13.3. Online Sales
  • 13.3.1. E-Commerce Platforms
  • 13.3.2. Manufacturer Portals

14. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Region

• 14.1. Americas
  • 14.1.1. North America
  • 14.1.2. Latin America
• 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 14.2.1. Europe
  • 14.2.2. Middle East
  • 14.2.3. Africa
• 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Group

• 15.1. ASEAN
• 15.2. GCC
• 15.3. European Union
• 15.4. BRICS
• 15.5. G7
• 15.6. NATO

16. Safety Edges Sensors Market, by Country

• 16.1. United States
• 16.2. Canada
• 16.3. Mexico
• 16.4. Brazil
• 16.5. United Kingdom
• 16.6. Germany
• 16.7. France
• 16.8. Russia
• 16.9. Italy
• 16.10. Spain
• 16.11. China
• 16.12. India
• 16.13. Japan
• 16.14. Australia
• 16.15. South Korea

17. United States Safety Edges Sensors Market

18. China Safety Edges Sensors Market

19. Competitive Landscape

• 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
• 19.5. Advanced Safety Technology, Inc.
• 19.6. Aso Safety, Inc.
• 19.7. AutomationDirect, Inc.
• 19.8. Banner Engineering Corp.
• 19.9. BBC Bircher Smart Access AG
• 19.10. Bircher Reglomat AG
• 19.11. Dalian Terada Electric Co., Ltd.
• 19.12. Delta-Q Technologies Corp.
• 19.13. Guangzhou Aofei Safety Equipment Co., Ltd.
• 19.14. Haining Huiteng Plastic Electric Co., Ltd.
• 19.15. Haumer GmbH
• 19.16. Mayser GmbH & Co. KG
• 19.17. Metrol Technology, Inc.
• 19.18. Miller Edge, Inc.
• 19.19. Muting Function SRL
• 19.20. Ningbo Haishu Safety Auto Equipment Co., Ltd.
• 19.21. Omron Corporation
• 19.22. Recora Company
• 19.23. Sentir, Inc.
• 19.24. Shanghai Langyi Industry Co., Ltd.
• 19.25. Shanghai Qinuo Industry Co., Ltd.
• 19.26. Shenzhen E-teck Automation Co., Ltd.
• 19.27. SICK AG
• 19.28. Tapeswitch Corporation
• 19.29. Tocchio S.r.l.
• 19.30. Wuxi Wolid Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.
• 19.31. Zhejiang Jiutong Electric Co., Ltd.