농업용 페로몬 시장 - 세계 예측(2026-2032년)

The Agricultural Pheromones Market is projected to grow by USD 16.52 billion at a CAGR of 17.27% by 2032.

Agricultural pheromones are becoming a critical tool in sustainable crop protection as growers, regulators, and food supply chains accelerate the transition toward integrated pest management, residue reduction, and biodiversity-conscious farming. These semiochemical-based solutions use species-specific chemical signals to monitor, disrupt, attract, or mass-trap insect pests while reducing reliance on broad-spectrum synthetic insecticides. Their relevance is rising across high-value fruits, vegetables, nuts, grains, and plantation crops where pest pressure, export residue limits, pollinator protection, and resistance management are central operational concerns. Pheromone-based pest control is particularly aligned with precision agriculture because it supports early pest detection, threshold-based interventions, mating disruption, and targeted application programs. As agricultural systems face climate variability, changing pest migration patterns, and stricter environmental standards, agricultural pheromones are shifting from niche biological inputs to essential components of modern crop protection strategies.

Transformative Shifts Reshaping the Agricultural Pheromones Landscape

The agricultural pheromones landscape is being reshaped by the convergence of regulatory pressure, biological innovation, digital monitoring, and grower demand for low-residue pest management. Governments and food retailers are increasingly promoting integrated pest management practices, which is strengthening adoption of pheromone traps, lures, dispensers, and mating disruption systems. Product development is moving toward longer-lasting formulations, improved field stability, microencapsulation, aerosol dispensers, and biodegradable delivery formats that reduce labor intensity and environmental load. Climate change is also transforming pest dynamics by expanding insect ranges, altering insect life cycles, and increasing the need for real-time surveillance in both temperate and tropical cropping systems. At the same time, export-oriented agriculture is driving demand for pest control tools that help meet maximum residue limits and phytosanitary requirements. These shifts are creating a more technology-enabled market environment in which pheromones are integrated with scouting, decision-support tools, biological control, and selective chemistry rather than used as standalone interventions.

Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Pheromone-Based Pest Management

Artificial intelligence is amplifying the value of agricultural pheromones by improving pest detection, trap interpretation, treatment timing, and field-level decision-making. AI-enabled image recognition can support automated identification and counting of insects captured in pheromone traps, reducing manual scouting burdens and improving consistency across large farms and dispersed orchards. Machine learning models that combine trap counts with weather, crop stage, pest biology, degree-day accumulation, and historical infestation data can help predict emergence patterns and optimize the placement and replacement timing of lures and dispensers. In mating disruption programs, AI can support more precise deployment density recommendations based on canopy structure, pest pressure, field configuration, and microclimatic conditions. The cumulative impact is a shift from reactive pest control to predictive integrated pest management, where agricultural pheromones serve as high-quality biological signals feeding digital agronomy platforms. This improves intervention accuracy, supports insecticide resistance management, and helps growers document compliance with sustainability, traceability, and residue-reduction requirements.

Key Regional Insights Across Asia-Pacific, North America, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa

Asia-Pacific is a high-potential region for agricultural pheromones due to intensive horticulture, rice and vegetable production, expanding fruit exports, and severe pest pressure in tropical and subtropical climates. China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Southeast Asian economies are increasingly using pheromone traps for monitoring and mating disruption in fruit orchards, vegetables, cotton, rice, and plantation crops, supported by public integrated pest management initiatives and growing awareness of residue-safe production. North America benefits from advanced pest monitoring practices, large-scale specialty crop systems, and strong adoption of integrated pest management in the United States and Canada, particularly across apples, grapes, nuts, berries, greenhouse crops, and row crops where resistance management, biosecurity, and labor-efficient scouting are priorities. Latin America is gaining relevance as Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Peru, and Argentina expand export-oriented fruit, vegetable, sugarcane, cotton, citrus, and soybean systems that require effective pest surveillance and compliance with international residue and phytosanitary standards. Europe is characterized by strict pesticide regulation, strong organic and low-input farming policies, and widespread adoption of mating disruption in vineyards, pome fruits, stone fruits, olives, and protected cultivation, making agricultural pheromones a strategic alternative within reduced-chemical crop protection programs. The Middle East is advancing pheromone use in controlled-environment agriculture, date palm systems, and high-value horticulture where water scarcity, food security priorities, and controlled production systems support precise and low-residue pest control. Africa presents growing opportunities as countries strengthen management of invasive pests, improve smallholder access to monitoring tools, and expand commercial horticulture for domestic and export channels, although adoption depends on affordability, extension support, distribution networks, and localized pest-specific formulations.

Key Group Insights Across ASEAN, GCC, European Union, BRICS, G7, and NATO Economies

ASEAN countries are increasingly relevant for agricultural pheromones because tropical pest pressure, year-round cropping, plantation agriculture, and export horticulture create persistent demand for monitoring and targeted insect control in crops such as rice, vegetables, fruits, oil palm, rubber, cocoa, and coffee. The GCC is adopting pheromone-based pest management in high-value protected cultivation, date production, and food-security-focused farming systems where precision, residue control, and reduced chemical exposure are critical in arid environments. The European Union is a major policy-driven adopter due to strong pesticide reduction objectives, organic agriculture support, biodiversity strategies, and rigorous residue compliance requirements, making pheromone traps and mating disruption important tools in integrated pest management. BRICS economies bring scale and diversity, with Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa facing significant pest challenges across row crops, orchards, vegetables, grains, and plantation systems while increasingly prioritizing biological and semiochemical alternatives for sustainable intensification. G7 countries demonstrate advanced adoption patterns through research capacity, digitized agriculture, regulatory oversight, and established integrated pest management practices, particularly in specialty crops, greenhouse production, and export-oriented supply chains. NATO member countries, many of which overlap with advanced agricultural economies in North America and Europe, show strong demand for resilient food systems, reduced dependency on high-risk chemical inputs, and technologies that enhance pest surveillance, biosecurity, traceability, and sustainable crop productivity.

Key Country Insights Across Major Agricultural Pheromone Adoption Markets

The United States shows strong use of agricultural pheromones in specialty crops, tree nuts, grapes, orchards, berries, and integrated pest management programs supported by digital scouting and resistance management practices, while Canada emphasizes low-residue pest monitoring in fruits, greenhouse crops, grains, and stored products under strict environmental and food safety expectations. Mexico benefits from export-oriented fruit and vegetable production, where pheromone traps support phytosanitary compliance and pest surveillance for North American and global trade. Brazil is a strategic market for pheromone adoption due to large-scale soybean, cotton, sugarcane, citrus, coffee, and fruit systems facing sustained insect pressure, with growing interest in biological crop protection. The United Kingdom applies pheromone-based monitoring in horticulture, protected crops, orchards, field vegetables, and stored product protection within an increasingly sustainability-driven regulatory environment. Germany, France, Italy, and Spain are prominent European adopters, especially in vineyards, pome fruits, stone fruits, olives, citrus, and greenhouse crops, where mating disruption and monitoring help reduce insecticide use and support residue-compliant production. Russia's broad agricultural base and regional pest variability create demand for monitoring technologies in grains, oilseeds, orchards, vegetables, and storage systems, although adoption depends on distribution and localized technical support. China is expanding pheromone use through large-scale integrated pest management initiatives, fruit production, vegetable systems, rice, tea, cotton, and efforts to reduce chemical pesticide intensity. India demonstrates strong need for pheromone traps in cotton, rice, pulses, vegetables, sugarcane, and fruit crops, supported by smallholder-focused pest surveillance and public extension programs. Japan and South Korea apply pheromones in high-value, quality-focused horticulture where precision, food safety, and environmental stewardship are central. Australia uses pheromone-based tools in orchards, vineyards, grains, cotton, and biosecurity-sensitive cropping systems, with emphasis on monitoring invasive pests, managing resistance, and protecting export market access.

Actionable Recommendations for Agricultural Pheromone Industry Leaders

Industry leaders should prioritize crop- and pest-specific pheromone solutions that integrate monitoring, mating disruption, mass trapping, and decision-support into complete integrated pest management programs. Product strategies should focus on field longevity, ease of deployment, compatibility with biological control agents, resistance management programs, and suitability for diverse climates ranging from humid tropics to arid protected cultivation. Partnerships with extension networks, cooperatives, distributors, and digital agriculture platforms can improve grower education, correct installation, trap servicing, and data-driven pest threshold management. Technology investment should emphasize AI-enabled trap analytics, remote monitoring, geospatial mapping, and predictive pest models to reduce labor constraints and improve intervention timing. Regulatory and commercial teams should align product positioning with residue reduction, pesticide resistance management, pollinator protection, worker safety, and export compliance. To accelerate adoption, leaders should develop affordable formats for smallholders, scalable dispenser systems for large farms, and localized formulations that reflect regional pest complexes, crop calendars, and climatic conditions.

Research Methodology for Evidence-Based Agricultural Pheromone Insights

This executive summary is developed through a structured secondary research approach focused on verified agricultural, regulatory, scientific, and industry sources. The methodology emphasizes peer-reviewed literature on semiochemicals and integrated pest management, government and intergovernmental guidance on pesticide reduction and sustainable agriculture, crop protection regulations, extension service publications, residue and phytosanitary compliance references, and documented use cases across major agricultural regions. Insights are triangulated across crop type, pest biology, regional farming systems, regulatory direction, sustainability priorities, and technology adoption trends to identify consistent demand drivers and operational implications. The analysis excludes market sizing, market estimation, market share, and forecasting, and instead focuses on qualitative and evidence-backed assessment of adoption patterns, technology shifts, regional dynamics, and strategic priorities for agricultural pheromones.

Conclusion on the Strategic Role of Agricultural Pheromones

Agricultural pheromones are positioned at the intersection of sustainable crop protection, precision agriculture, biological pest management, and regulatory transformation. Their ability to deliver species-specific pest monitoring, mass trapping, and mating disruption makes them highly relevant for growers managing residue requirements, insecticide resistance, labor constraints, pollinator stewardship, and climate-driven pest volatility. Regional adoption is influenced by crop intensity, export exposure, pest pressure, policy support, and access to technical knowledge, while artificial intelligence is increasing the scalability and reliability of pheromone-based decision-making. As agriculture moves toward more targeted, data-enabled, and environmentally responsible pest control, pheromones are expected to remain a foundational component of integrated pest management programs across both advanced and emerging farming systems.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Definition
• 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
• 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
• 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Introduction
• 2.2. Research Design
  • 2.2.1. Primary Research
  • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
• 2.3. Research Framework
  • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
  • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
• 2.4. Market Size Estimation
  • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
  • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
• 2.5. Data Triangulation
• 2.6. Research Outcomes
• 2.7. Research Assumptions
• 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Introduction
• 3.2. CXO Perspective
• 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
• 3.4. New Revenue Opportunities
• 3.5. Next-Generation Business Models
• 3.6. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
  • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
• 4.3. Market Dynamics
  • 4.3.1. Key Drivers
  • 4.3.2. Key Restraints
  • 4.3.3. Key Opportunities
  • 4.3.4. Key Challenges
• 4.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 4.5. PESTLE Analysis
• 4.6. Market Outlook
  • 4.6.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
  • 4.6.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
  • 4.6.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
• 4.7. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
• 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
• 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
• 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
• 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
• 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
• 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
• 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
• 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2026

7. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Product Type

• 7.1. Introduction
• 7.2. Aggregation Pheromones
• 7.3. Alarm Pheromones
• 7.4. Sex Pheromones
• 7.5. Trail Pheromones

8. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Function

• 8.1. Introduction
• 8.2. Attract-and-Kill
• 8.3. Mass Trapping
• 8.4. Mating Disruption
• 8.5. Monitoring & Detection

9. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Pest Type

• 9.1. Introduction
• 9.2. Coleoptera
• 9.3. Diptera
• 9.4. Hemiptera
• 9.5. Lepidoptera

10. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Source

• 10.1. Introduction
• 10.2. Natural
• 10.3. Synthetic

11. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Formulation

• 11.1. Introduction
• 11.2. Liquid
• 11.3. Solid

12. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Crop

• 12.1. Introduction
• 12.2. Fruits
  • 12.2.1. Berries
  • 12.2.2. Citrus
  • 12.2.3. Grapes
  • 12.2.4. Pome Fruits
  • 12.2.5. Stone Fruits
  • 12.2.6. Tropical Fruits
• 12.3. Ornamentals
  • 12.3.1. Landscape Ornamentals
  • 12.3.2. Potted Plants
• 12.4. Row Crops
  • 12.4.1. Cereals
  • 12.4.2. Legumes
  • 12.4.3. Oilseeds
• 12.5. Vegetables
  • 12.5.1. Brassicas
  • 12.5.2. Cucurbits
  • 12.5.3. Leafy Greens
  • 12.5.4. Root & Tuber

13. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Application Method

• 13.1. Introduction
• 13.2. Dispenser
• 13.3. Sprays
• 13.4. Traps

14. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by End User

• 14.1. Introduction
• 14.2. Commercial Growers
• 14.3. Government Agencies
• 14.4. Research Institutions

15. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Distribution Channel

• 15.1. Introduction
• 15.2. Offline
• 15.3. Online

16. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Region

• 16.1. Asia-Pacific
• 16.2. North America
• 16.3. Latin America
• 16.4. Europe
• 16.5. Middle East
• 16.6. Africa

17. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Group

• 17.1. ASEAN
• 17.2. GCC
• 17.3. European Union
• 17.4. BRICS
• 17.5. G7
• 17.6. NATO

18. Agricultural Pheromones Market, by Country

• 18.1. United States
• 18.2. China
• 18.3. Germany
• 18.4. India
• 18.5. United Kingdom
• 18.6. Japan
• 18.7. France
• 18.8. Italy
• 18.9. Canada
• 18.10. Spain
• 18.11. Australia
• 18.12. South Korea
• 18.13. Brazil
• 18.14. Russia
• 18.15. Mexico

19. Competitive Landscape

• 19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2025
• 19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
• 19.3. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
  • 19.3.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
• 19.4. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
• 19.5. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
• 19.6. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025

20. Company Profiles

• 20.1. Agri Phero Solutionz Pvt Ltd.
• 20.2. Andermatt Group AG
• 20.3. ATGC Biotech Pvt Ltd.
• 20.4. BASF SE
• 20.5. Bedoukian Research, Inc
• 20.6. Bio Controle
• 20.7. Bioline AgroSciences Ltd.
• 20.8. CBC Co.,Ltd.
• 20.9. Certis Belchim B.V
• 20.10. Corteva Agriscience LLC
• 20.11. CropG1 Agro Research & Development Private Limited
• 20.12. Floridienne Group
• 20.13. FMC Corporation
• 20.14. Indore Bio Agri Indputs & Research Pvt Ltd
• 20.15. International Pheromone Systems Ltd.
• 20.16. Isagro S.p.A.
• 20.17. ISCA Inc
• 20.18. Jaydev Chemical Industries
• 20.19. Koppert B.V.
• 20.20. Laboratorios Agrochem S.L.
• 20.21. Novagrica
• 20.22. Pacific Biocontrol Corporation
• 20.23. Pherobank B.V.
• 20.24. PheroSyn Ltd.
• 20.25. Provivi, Inc.
• 20.26. Russell IPM Holdings Ltd
• 20.27. Scyll'Agro
• 20.28. SEDQ Healthy Crops S.L.
• 20.29. SHIN-ETSU Chemical Co., Ltd
• 20.30. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd
• 20.31. Suterra LLC by The Wonderful Company LLC
• 20.32. Syngenta Crop Protection AG
• 20.33. Trece Inc.