유럽의 군용 무인 차량 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2025-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the europe military unmanned vehicles market size is expected to grow from USD 5.15 billion in 2025 to USD 5.46 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 8.29 billion by 2031 at 8.71% CAGR over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Platform Type (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Unmanned Ground Vehicles, and More), Mode of Operation (Remotely Piloted, Semi-Autonomous, and More), Application (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance, and More), Vehicle Size (Small, Medium, and Large), and Geography (United Kingdom, Germany, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Europe Military Unmanned Vehicles Market Trends and Insights

Rising Defense Budgets Accelerate Multi-Domain Unmanned Procurement

European defense spending increased in 2025 and continues to prioritize unmanned platforms in land, air, and maritime missions, supporting scale and recurring procurement cycles across the Europe military unmanned vehicles market. Germany allocated significant funding for unmanned capabilities, including a joint loitering-munition award planned for 2026, as part of efforts to develop hundreds of collaborative aircraft. Poland's defense spending emphasizes counter-UAS systems with high interception success rates and the expansion of domestic UAV production lines. France has committed substantial resources to unmanned systems through the next decade, with additional investments in AI-enabled drone development to advance domestic manufacturing and software-driven architectures, supporting long-term technological and operational objectives. These allocations target full-fleet modernization rather than incremental upgrades, which favors interoperable control systems and common payload standards across services.

EU And NATO Modernization Programs Expand Autonomous Adoption

The European Defence Fund committed EUR 7 billion (USD 8.14 billion) for 2021-2027 and has allocated a significant amount to AI and digital technologies, which underpin interoperable programs such as LEAP, launched by France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the UK in February 2026. Sweden's LUUV program, awarded in October 2025, integrates AI navigation for GPS-denied maritime missions and is set to move to summer 2026 trials, signaling near-term operationalization in cold-water environments. The LEAP initiative accelerates the adoption of common data-link standards to reduce duplication across national fleets and enable combined operations. The Europe military unmanned vehicles market benefits from aligned standards that ease integration into NATO task groups and facilitate cross-border readiness for ISR, logistics, and counter-mine missions.

Fragmented Procurement Regulations and Airworthiness Certification Across EU Member States

Certification pathways vary by country and category, introducing friction that slows cross-border deployments in the Europe military unmanned vehicles market. National testing requirements, including electromagnetic compatibility and collision-avoidance in segregated airspace, increase supplier costs across jurisdictions. These variations increase lifecycle costs and complicate sustainment planning for mixed fleets in multinational brigades, thereby impacting operational efficiency and long-term resource allocation. NATO's STANAG 4586 harmonization is not yet comprehensive for ground and maritime controllers, which leaves multi-vendor teams to handle interface work themselves during integration. The EU Cybersecurity Act drives IEC 62443 certification for industrial controls, and many platforms still need retrofits to meet required assurance levels for connectivity and autonomy components.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. AI-Enabled Autonomy Improves Mission Efficiency and Reduces Risk
2. EU Action Plans on Drone and Counter-Drone Security Unlock New Programs
3. Cybersecurity and EW Vulnerabilities In C2 Links And GNSS-Dependent Platforms

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

UAVs led with a 76.86% share in 2025, while UMVs are projected to expand at a 13.99% CAGR through 2031 as NATO prioritizes mine countermeasures and undersea security in the North Sea and Baltic theaters. The Belgian-Dutch rMCM program, valued at EUR 2.2 billion (USD 2.56 billion), delivered the first vessels in March 2026 and aims to cut per-mission costs by 50-60% by shifting high-risk clearance tasks from crewed hulls to unmanned surface and underwater vehicles. Sweden's LUUV contract for SEK 60 million (USD 6.3 million) targets GPS-denied environments with AI-based sonar classification, and third-quarter 2026 trials will test longer patrol durations and low-latency operator oversight in cold waters. UGVs hold a mid-teen share, with growth in logistics and EOD roles, as units field standardized platforms that integrate payloads via open interfaces to reduce maintenance and training burdens. The Europe military unmanned vehicles market continues to see UAVs as the volume driver because Group 1 and Group 2 systems scale quickly with commercial components and dual-use supply chains, especially where BVLOS is not required. Unmanned marine systems benefit from NATO-certified mission packages for mine detection and neutralization, and now receive a larger share of capital budgets as maritime choke points elevate risk profiles.

UMV adoption reshapes fleet composition by combining unmanned mother ships with autonomous mine-hunting vehicles to expand coverage without exposing crews to more IEDs. In the air domain, the United Kingdom's Protector RG Mk1 anchors ISR modernization through AI-assisted planning, multi-sensor ensembles, and STANAG 4586 compatibility, enabling collaboration with NATO assets. Ground robotics remains essential for base logistics and EOD, and European programs now favor autonomy kits that can be refitted across multiple chassis to protect investment and avoid lock-in. The Europe military unmanned vehicles market supports common command-and-control and control station standards so teams can reallocate vehicles between ISR, logistics, and engineering missions as needed NATO. Procurement teams seek platform-agnostic autonomy layers because long-term cost savings derive from software reuse and shared training across formations in the Europe military unmanned vehicles market.

Remotely piloted systems held a 46.24% share in 2025, while fully autonomous platforms are projected to expand at a 11.24% CAGR through 2031 as contested EW environments increase the need for on-board decision loops that do not depend on constant control links. Helsing's CA-1 Europa demonstrates coordinated multi-platform engagements with faster cycle times, aligning with NATO's push for resilient kill chains. Sweden's 100-UAS swarm demonstration showed that one operator can supervise complex search-and-allocation patterns across large areas, reducing manpower requirements per sortie. Semi-autonomous modes hold a mid-30s share because they allow pre-programmed routes with human authorization for key steps, balancing speed and oversight in the Europe military unmanned vehicles market. Fully autonomous growth focuses on ISR and logistics, where rules of engagement do not require immediate human authority, and autonomy supports tight timelines and sparse communications. The EU AI Act exempts military applications, but militaries continue to define operational guardrails while awaiting NATO-level guidance to standardize ethical and safety practices.

Suppliers build autonomy stacks around supervised modes that ensure an operator can intervene, thereby improving acceptance among commanders and procurement authorities in the European unmanned vehicles industry. Standardized handoff of control from remote to autonomous modes is becoming a design requirement in RF-contested areas, and airworthiness authorities continue to address safety cases for multi-vehicle operations. Training pipelines include human-machine team drills so operators can safely supervise more safely, and doctrine aligns with meaningful human control standards for engagement decisions. Over the forecast period, autonomy adoption is likely to expand from ISR and logistics to engineering and mine-countermeasure roles where on-board processing and deterministic behaviors improve mission timing in the Europe military unmanned vehicles market.

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

1. Airbus SE
2. Leonardo S.p.A.
3. Dassault Aviation SA
4. Rheinmetall AG
5. BAE Systems plc
6. Thales Group
7. Saab AB
8. Milrem AS
9. QinetiQ Group
10. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
11. Exail Technologies SA
12. Elbit Systems Ltd.
13. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
14. Lockheed Martin Corporation
15. General Atomics
16. Northrop Grumman Corporation
17. Textron Inc.
18. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
19. AeroVironment, Inc.
20. Anduril Industries, Inc.
21. DroneShield Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Operational success of low-cost attritable drone swarms in Ukraine influencing European defense strategies
  • 4.2.2 Large EU and NATO modernization programs driving adoption of autonomous and unmanned systems
  • 4.2.3 Rising defense budgets in Europe accelerating procurement of multi-domain unmanned platforms
  • 4.2.4 Advancements in AI-enabled autonomy improving mission efficiency and reducing manpower risks
  • 4.2.5 EU action plans on drone and counter-drone security unlocking new funding and development initiatives
  • 4.2.6 Emergence of European tier-2 and tier-3 suppliers strengthening the regional unmanned systems ecosystem
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Cybersecurity and EW vulnerabilities in C2 links and GNSS-dependent platforms
  • 4.3.2 Fragmented procurement regulations and airworthiness certification across EU member states
  • 4.3.3 Dependence on non-European semiconductor and RF component supply chains subject to export controls
  • 4.3.4 Rising lifecycle and sustainment costs of advanced autonomous unmanned systems
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Platform Type
  • 5.1.1 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
  • 5.1.2 Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs)
  • 5.1.3 Unmanned Marine Vehicles (UMVs)
• 5.2 By Mode of Operation
  • 5.2.1 Remotely Piloted
  • 5.2.2 Semi-Autonomous
  • 5.2.3 Fully Autonomous
• 5.3 By Application
  • 5.3.1 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
  • 5.3.2 Combat
  • 5.3.3 Logistics and Resupply
  • 5.3.4 Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD)
  • 5.3.5 Mine Counter-Measures (MCM)
  • 5.3.6 Others
• 5.4 By Vehicle Size
  • 5.4.1 Small
  • 5.4.2 Medium
  • 5.4.3 Large
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 United Kingdom
  • 5.5.2 Germany
  • 5.5.3 Spain
  • 5.5.4 Italy
  • 5.5.5 France
  • 5.5.6 Russia
  • 5.5.7 Norway
  • 5.5.8 Poland
  • 5.5.9 Sweden
  • 5.5.10 Rest of Europe

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Airbus SE
  • 6.4.2 Leonardo S.p.A.
  • 6.4.3 Dassault Aviation SA
  • 6.4.4 Rheinmetall AG
  • 6.4.5 BAE Systems plc
  • 6.4.6 Thales Group
  • 6.4.7 Saab AB
  • 6.4.8 Milrem AS
  • 6.4.9 QinetiQ Group
  • 6.4.10 Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
  • 6.4.11 Exail Technologies SA
  • 6.4.12 Elbit Systems Ltd.
  • 6.4.13 Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
  • 6.4.14 Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • 6.4.15 General Atomics
  • 6.4.16 Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • 6.4.17 Textron Inc.
  • 6.4.18 L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
  • 6.4.19 AeroVironment, Inc.
  • 6.4.20 Anduril Industries, Inc.
  • 6.4.21 DroneShield Ltd.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment