ESG 분석 및 벤치마킹 플랫폼 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market size is projected to be USD 4.16 billion in 2025, USD 4.80 billion in 2026, and reach USD 10.51 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 16.97% from 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Deployment Mode (Cloud-Based, On-Premises, and Hybrid), Offering (Software Platforms, and Services), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises), End-Use Industry (IT and Telecom, BFSI, Industrial Manufacturing, Energy and Utilities, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global ESG Analytics and Benchmarking Platform Market Trends and Insights

Rising Demand for Auditable ESG Disclosures

Mandatory reporting is changing ESG software from a disclosure support tool into an operating system for controlled reporting. Companies now need workflows that can support recurring filing cycles, internal review, and external assurance without relying on manual spreadsheet consolidation. That shift is important for the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market because regulatory pressure now affects not only direct reporters but also multinational groups and supplier networks tied to in-scope entities. The resulting demand is strongest where reporting rules are more mature, but the same buying logic is spreading across global operations that want a single, governed data layer rather than local workarounds. This is also raising the value of platforms that can handle dual materiality, version control, and framework mapping in a single environment. As disclosure moves closer to financial reporting, the buying conversation is shifting from optional ESG tooling to an auditable data infrastructure.

AI-Enabled Normalization of Fragmented ESG Data

AI is becoming most useful where companies need to clean, structure, and reconcile inconsistent sustainability data across systems and entities. In the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market, that matters because fragmented inputs still limit benchmark quality, especially when enterprises need cross-border or multi-business-unit comparisons. IBM expanded this normalization layer in 2026 through Envizi product updates that supported emissions calculations in Excel and new framework configurations tied to revised reporting needs. Those moves show how vendors are trying to reduce the operational burden of updates while keeping ESG calculations closer to core business workflows. They also show why AI and embedded calculation tools are pushing competition away from simple data capture and toward interpretation, benchmarking, and scenario support. As these capabilities mature, the time and cost required to improve Scope 3 coverage are declining.

ESG Data Quality Gaps Across Private Suppliers

The biggest operating weakness in the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market is still the quality of upstream supplier data. An OECD analysis published in 2025 found that only 7% of ESG metrics across major products directly addressed supply-chain risk management, while 68% of performance metrics remained input-based and qualitative. A December 2025 Sage study added that only 32% of SMEs had sustainability reporting infrastructure in place, and 62% identified complexity as the main barrier to formal reporting. These conditions matter because small suppliers account for a large share of enterprise value chains, yet many still lack systems capable of producing auditable ESG data. That forces platform vendors to rely more heavily on estimation models, supplier engagement modules, and data quality controls, which raises product complexity and service effort. Until upstream reporting maturity improves, benchmarking depth will remain uneven across many customer environments.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Investor Pressure for Comparable ESG Scores
2. Procurement-Led Supplier ESG Screening
3. Methodology Drift Across Rating and Benchmarking Models

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Cloud-based deployment accounted for 66.12% of the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market in 2025. That lead reflects the advantage of delivery models that can absorb regulatory updates through ongoing product releases rather than through one-time internal IT changes. Companies are using cloud environments to keep disclosure logic, benchmark settings, and emissions calculations aligned with changing reporting frameworks. This has made the cloud the default option for buyers who want faster implementation and easier update cycles across the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market.

Hybrid deployment is projected to expand at 17.25% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. This growth reflects the reality that sensitive workforce, compensation, and social data cannot always move into a single public cloud environment. Multinational companies often need local handling for restricted data while still using centralized benchmarking and disclosure controls. That balance is expected to keep hybrid as the fastest-growing deployment pattern in the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market.

Software platforms accounted for 69.45% of the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market in 2025. Enterprises favored configurable platforms that could bring together ESG data management, disclosure workflows, and benchmarking outputs in a single, governed environment. This preference strengthened as reporting expectations moved closer to finance and compliance controls. Audit trails, workflow approvals, and user-level access controls therefore support the leading position of software in the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market.

Services are projected to grow at 17.05% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. This expansion reflects the complexity of implementing ESG systems across ERP, procurement, HR, supplier, and facility data sources simultaneously. Many companies still need support to map internal data to frameworks such as CSRD, GRI, SASB, CDP, and ISSB. Services are also gaining because many organizations still lack enough in-house reporting depth to manage full deployment and framework translation on their own.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Deployment Mode
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premises
  • Hybrid
• By Offering
  • Software Platforms
  • Services
• By Enterprise Size
  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium Enterprises
• By End-Use Industry
  • IT and Telecom
  • BFSI
  • Industrial Manufacturing
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Oil and Gas
  • Retail and E-Commerce
  • Food and Beverage Manufacturing
  • Construction and Infrastructure
  • Government and Public Sector
  • Other End-User Industries
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Europe held 34.56% of the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market share in 2025. The region led because it had the strongest mix of enforceable disclosure rules, buyer expectations, and reporting discipline across large enterprises. That environment supported demand for platforms that could manage recurring reporting cycles, assurance preparation, and benchmark consistency. The regional market also benefits from supply-chain effects because large in-scope companies pass structured ESG data requirements to a much wider supplier base. IHK Munchen noted in 2026 that many firms removed from direct CSRD scope would still face indirect reporting demands through customer relationships.

North America also accounted for a meaningful share of the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market in 2025. Enterprise climate reporting needs, investor scrutiny, and the extraterritorial effect of European disclosure requirements on global companies have driven demand in the region. U.S.-based multinationals with operations, listings, or supplier links in Europe have had to strengthen their reporting systems, even where local rules were less uniform. This has supported platform adoption among companies that need to work across multiple reporting regimes simultaneously. South America remained at an earlier stage, with Brazil leading demand among large listed companies, while other South American markets stayed in a more gradual adoption phase.

Asia-Pacific is projected to expand at a 17.45% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, making it the fastest-growing regional segment in the ESG analytics and benchmarking platform market. The region's momentum reflects a broader rise in sustainability integration across business operations rather than reliance on a single regulatory trigger. The Conference Board reported in 2026 that Asia-Pacific executives placed greater emphasis on corporate sustainability than global peers, and that 50% or more of businesses in the region were expected to have fully integrated sustainability operations by 2026, up from 36% in 2025. The Middle East and Africa are also growing from a smaller base, supported by national sustainability agendas, investor screening requirements, and buyer-led supply-chain reporting requests for export-facing companies.

1. Microsoft Corporation
2. IBM Corporation
3. SAP SE
4. Salesforce, Inc.
5. Wolters Kluwer N.V.
6. Workiva Inc.
7. Sphera Solutions, Inc.
8. Enablon SAS
9. Intelex Technologies ULC
10. Diligent Corporation
11. Cority Software Inc.
12. Nasdaq, Inc.
13. EcoVadis SAS
14. Ulula Inc.
15. Novisto Inc.
16. SP Global Inc.
17. Moody's Corporation
18. LSEG Data and Analytics,
19. Gensuite LLC
20. Persefoni AI, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising Demand for Auditable ESG Disclosures
  • 4.2.2 Procurement-Led Supplier ESG Screening
  • 4.2.3 AI-Enabled Normalization of Fragmented ESG Data
  • 4.2.4 Investor Pressure for Comparable ESG Scores
  • 4.2.5 Double Materiality Adoption in Reporting Workflows
  • 4.2.6 Integration With Enterprise Risk and Finance Systems
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 ESG Data Quality Gaps Across Private Suppliers
  • 4.3.2 Methodology Drift Across Rating and Benchmarking Models
  • 4.3.3 High Implementation Burden for Mid-Market Firms
  • 4.3.4 Regulatory Fragmentation Across Jurisdictions
• 4.4 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.5 Industry Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
• 4.6 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.7 Technological Outlook
• 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.8.5 Intensity Of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Deployment Mode
  • 5.1.1 Cloud-Based
  • 5.1.2 On-Premises
  • 5.1.3 Hybrid
• 5.2 By Offering
  • 5.2.1 Software Platforms
  • 5.2.2 Services
• 5.3 By Enterprise Size
  • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
  • 5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
• 5.4 By End-Use Industry
  • 5.4.1 IT and Telecom
  • 5.4.2 BFSI
  • 5.4.3 Industrial Manufacturing
  • 5.4.4 Energy and Utilities
  • 5.4.5 Oil and Gas
  • 5.4.6 Retail and E-Commerce
  • 5.4.7 Food and Beverage Manufacturing
  • 5.4.8 Construction and Infrastructure
  • 5.4.9 Government and Public Sector
  • 5.4.10 Other End-User Industries
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Russia
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 India
    • 5.5.4.3 Japan
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
      • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Microsoft Corporation
  • 6.4.2 IBM Corporation
  • 6.4.3 SAP SE
  • 6.4.4 Salesforce, Inc.
  • 6.4.5 Wolters Kluwer N.V.
  • 6.4.6 Workiva Inc.
  • 6.4.7 Sphera Solutions, Inc.
  • 6.4.8 Enablon SAS
  • 6.4.9 Intelex Technologies ULC
  • 6.4.10 Diligent Corporation
  • 6.4.11 Cority Software Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Nasdaq, Inc.
  • 6.4.13 EcoVadis SAS
  • 6.4.14 Ulula Inc.
  • 6.4.15 Novisto Inc.
  • 6.4.16 SP Global Inc.
  • 6.4.17 Moody's Corporation
  • 6.4.18 LSEG Data and Analytics,
  • 6.4.19 Gensuite LLC
  • 6.4.20 Persefoni AI, Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment