중동의 사료용 마이코톡신 해독제 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the middle east feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market size is projected to expand from USD 59.11 million in 2025 and USD 60.62 million in 2026 to USD 68.75 million by 2031, registering a CAGR of 2.55% between 2026 and 2031.

This report is Segmented by Sub-Additive (Binders and Biotransformers), by Animal (Aquaculture, Poultry, Ruminants, Swine, and Other Animals), and by Geography (Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Rest of the Middle East). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD) and Volume (Metric Tons).

Middle East Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers Market Trends and Insights

Poultry and Dairy Intensification Under Extreme Heat Conditions

Poultry and dairy expansion is creating a steady volume base for the Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market, as high-output farms cannot absorb repeated disruptions to feed quality without measurable losses. Saudi Arabia's food security agenda continues to drive increased local poultry production. Corn usage in feed has reached a range from 4.6 to 4.9 million metric tons in the marketing year 2025/26, compared to 4.7 million metric tons in 2024/25, reflecting the rapid growth in ration demand within the kingdom. In hot environments, grain and finished feed face a shorter safe storage window, so larger poultry and dairy operators are more willing to include detoxifiers on a preventive basis rather than wait for visible production losses. Dairy also introduces residue risk, as aflatoxin B1 in feed can be converted to aflatoxin M1 in milk, underscoring the importance of risk management. Formal testing in organized dairy chains is becoming more common. The commercial logic is stronger in vertically integrated systems, where a single contamination event can simultaneously affect feed conversion, flock health, milk quality, and the branded product's reputation. That dynamic gives the Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market a demand base that is tied not only to contamination levels but also to the operating model of modern livestock production.

Hot-Climate and Import-Driven Mycotoxin Risk in Feed Supply Chains

The Middle East mycotoxin detoxifiers market also benefits from the region's structural dependence on imported feed materials, as contamination burdens are shaped by long transit times, repeated handling, and warm storage conditions after arrival. A January 2025 study in Toxins examined 100 poultry feedstuff samples from Riyadh, Al-Hassa, Qassim, and Jeddah and found multi-mycotoxin contamination in every sample, with aflatoxins detected in 84% and fumonisins in 56%. The same study reported that Aspergillus flavus was the dominant aflatoxigenic species isolated, underscoring the importance of storage conditions and handling practices, not just contamination at origin. This matters because commercial feed lots increasingly exhibit multiple toxin classes simultaneously, which undermines the usefulness of narrow, single-target solutions. As a result, buyers in the Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market are gradually moving from event-based purchases toward more routine inclusion programs for finished feed, especially in poultry-heavy systems. The shift is important because it turns detoxifier demand into a recurring operating cost instead of an occasional corrective response.

Price Sensitivity and Preference for Untreated or Locally Sourced Feed

Price sensitivity is the primary commercial restraint in the Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market, as smaller livestock operators often view detoxifiers as non-essential. This challenge is particularly evident in Iran and among smaller-scale operations across the region, where purchasing decisions prioritize immediate feed costs over the potential to prevent downstream losses. In areas with limited rapid testing, contamination is frequently identified only after signs of reduced animal performance emerge. Even then, the issue is often attributed to other nutritional or management factors, delaying the adoption of detoxifiers. The lack of regular diagnostics and comprehensive recordkeeping makes it difficult to demonstrate the economic benefits of preventive detoxification. This creates a gap between biological risks and the commercial adoption of detoxifiers, slowing market growth beyond what contamination prevalence would suggest. Without improved testing access or more consistent regulatory enforcement, low-cost, untreated feed will continue to limit market penetration.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Stronger Feed Safety and Residue Oversight Across GCC Markets
2. Expansion of Industrial Feed Milling and Commercial Livestock Farming
3. Red Sea and Gulf Shipping Disruptions Affecting Additive Supply Chains

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Binders accounted for 66.3% of the Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market share in 2025, making them the largest sub-additive segment across poultry, dairy, and ruminant feed programs. This dominance reflects a long-standing preference for clay-based solutions, which are familiar to formulators, cost-effective, and easy to incorporate into feed without significant process modifications. In many commercial systems, binders serve as the primary defense mechanism, as aflatoxin control remains a critical economic and regulatory priority. This is particularly significant in countries where buyers require low-cost solutions that can be applied across large feed volumes with minimal technical complexity. Consequently, the Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market continues to rely heavily on mineral adsorbents as the foundational approach for routine mycotoxin management.

The Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market size for biotransformers is projected to grow at a 2.6% CAGR through 2031, making them the fastest-growing sub-additive segment despite starting from a smaller base. This growth is driven by the region's diverse contamination profile, as binders are less effective against certain Fusarium-derived toxins compared to enzymatic or biological degradation methods. A 2024 survey by DSM-Firmenich AG of finished feed in Turkey and the Middle East revealed fumonisins in 93% of sampled lots and zearalenone in 83%, highlighting the need for solutions beyond mineral adsorption. As multi-toxin exposure becomes a common challenge in commercial feed procurement, nutrition teams are increasingly adopting hybrid and multi-mechanism programs. While binders are expected to remain relevant, the growth of the Middle East feed mycotoxin detoxifiers market is increasingly influenced by products capable of addressing a broader toxin spectrum with enhanced technical precision.

Complete Report Scope:

• Sub Additive
  • Binders
  • Biotransformers
• Animal
  • Aquaculture
    • By Sub Animal
      • Fish
      • Shrimp
      • Other Aquaculture Species
  • Poultry
    • By Sub Animal
      • Broiler
      • Layer
      • Other Poultry Birds
  • Ruminants
    • By Sub Animal
      • Beef Cattle
      • Dairy Cattle
      • Other Ruminants
  • Swine
  • Other Animals
• Country
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Iran
  • Rest of Middle East

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

1. DSM-Firmenich AG
2. Kemin Industries, Inc.
3. Alltech, Inc.
4. Cargill, Incorporated
5. BASF SE
6. Bluestar Adisseo Company
7. Archer Daniels Midland Company
8. EW Nutrition GmbH
9. Clariant AG
10. Nutreco N.V.
11. Novus International, Inc.
12. Phibro Animal Health Corporation
13. Special Nutrients, LLC
14. Impextraco NV
15. Bentoli, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study
• 1.3 Research Methodology

2 REPORT OFFERS

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & KEY FINDINGS

4 KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS

• 4.1 Animal Headcount
  • 4.1.1 Poultry
  • 4.1.2 Ruminants
  • 4.1.3 Swine
• 4.2 Feed Production
  • 4.2.1 Aquaculture
  • 4.2.2 Poultry
  • 4.2.3 Ruminants
  • 4.2.4 Swine
• 4.3 Regulatory Framework
  • 4.3.1 Middle East
• 4.4 Value Chain & Distribution Channel Analysis
• 4.5 Market Drivers
  • 4.5.1 Poultry and dairy intensification under extreme heat conditions
  • 4.5.2 Hot-climate and import-driven mycotoxin exposure risk in feed supply chains
  • 4.5.3 Stronger feed safety and residue oversight across GCC markets
  • 4.5.4 Expansion of industrial feed milling and commercial livestock farming
  • 4.5.5 Multi-mycotoxin contamination requiring broader-spectrum solutions
  • 4.5.6 Use of alternative feed ingredients raising contamination risks
• 4.6 Market Restraints
  • 4.6.1 Price sensitivity and preference for untreated or locally sourced feed
  • 4.6.2 Limited diagnostic and formulation availability in smaller markets
  • 4.6.3 Efficacy variability under complex toxin co-contamination profiles
  • 4.6.4 Red Sea and Gulf shipping disruptions affecting additive supply chains

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value and Volume)

• 5.1 Sub Additive
  • 5.1.1 Binders
  • 5.1.2 Biotransformers
• 5.2 Animal
  • 5.2.1 Aquaculture
    • 5.2.1.1 By Sub Animal
      • 5.2.1.1.1 Fish
      • 5.2.1.1.2 Shrimp
      • 5.2.1.1.3 Other Aquaculture Species
  • 5.2.2 Poultry
    • 5.2.2.1 By Sub Animal
      • 5.2.2.1.1 Broiler
      • 5.2.2.1.2 Layer
      • 5.2.2.1.3 Other Poultry Birds
  • 5.2.3 Ruminants
    • 5.2.3.1 By Sub Animal
      • 5.2.3.1.1 Beef Cattle
      • 5.2.3.1.2 Dairy Cattle
      • 5.2.3.1.3 Other Ruminants
  • 5.2.4 Swine
  • 5.2.5 Other Animals
• 5.3 Country
  • 5.3.1 Saudi Arabia
  • 5.3.2 Iran
  • 5.3.3 Rest of Middle East

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Key Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and Analysis of Recent Developments).
  • 6.4.1 DSM-Firmenich AG
  • 6.4.2 Kemin Industries, Inc.
  • 6.4.3 Alltech, Inc.
  • 6.4.4 Cargill, Incorporated
  • 6.4.5 BASF SE
  • 6.4.6 Bluestar Adisseo Company
  • 6.4.7 Archer Daniels Midland Company
  • 6.4.8 EW Nutrition GmbH
  • 6.4.9 Clariant AG
  • 6.4.10 Nutreco N.V.
  • 6.4.11 Novus International, Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Phibro Animal Health Corporation
  • 6.4.13 Special Nutrients, LLC
  • 6.4.14 Impextraco NV
  • 6.4.15 Bentoli, Inc.

7 KEY STRATEGIC QUESTIONS FOR FEED ADDITIVE CEOS