잔디용 생물학적 방제제 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the turf grass biocontrol agents market size was valued at USD 8.70 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 9.29 billion in 2026 to reach USD 12.91 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 6.80% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Type of Biocontrol Agent (Microbial, Macrobiological, Biochemical, and Plant Extract), Application (Golf Courses, Sports Fields, Landscaping, and More), Formulation (Liquid, Granular, Powder, and Encapsulated and Suspension), and Geography (North America, South America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Middle East and Africa). The Report Offers Forecasts in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Turf Grass Biocontrol Agents Market Trends and Insights

Rising Regulatory Preference for Low-Residue Turf Inputs

The turfgrass biocontrol agents market is seeing a shift in regulation from a background factor to a direct purchasing driver. European policy is narrowing the room for conventional chemistry and raising the value of biological programs that fit integrated pest management goals. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency is proposing a streamlined registration review process for several low-risk biopesticides, which improves the commercial outlook for new biological products. This matters because turf managers often need a solution that can stay inside compliance rules without disrupting disease control plans. As a result, the turf grass biocontrol agents market is gaining support from operators who now treat biologicals as a practical requirement rather than a voluntary sustainability upgrade.

Replacement Cycle From Synthetic Turf Fungicides to Biological Programs

The turfgrass biocontrol agents market is also supported by resistance issues in conventional fungicide programs. Research and field discussions on dollar spot indicate that Clarireedia spp. can develop resistance across important fungicide classes, underscoring the need for rotation strategies in managed turf. That pattern changes adoption behavior because many turf managers now start with biological tank mixes before moving into broader biological programs. This stepwise shift reduces risk and lets superintendents test fit, timing, and consistency inside familiar spray schedules. Over time, that approach is likely to keep expanding the turfgrass biocontrol agents market, even without a full ban on synthetic products.

Inconsistent Field Performance Versus Conventional Chemistries

Performance variability remains the clearest restraint in the turf grass biocontrol agents market. Research on turf biologicals shows that field results can shift with soil temperature, ultraviolet exposure, desiccation stress, compaction, and soil pH, especially on high-traffic surface. That matters more in premium venues because even limited disease expression can affect revenue, reputation, and field scheduling. Turf managers therefore compare biological programs against a very high visual and performance standard. Until consistency improves further, this issue will continue to slow adoption in parts of the turf grass biocontrol agents market.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Growth in Golf Course and Sports Field Stewardship Budgets
2. Rising Disease Pressure From Climate Volatility and Heat Stress
3. Higher Application Discipline and Timing Requirements

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Microbial biocontrol agents accounted for 52.6% of the turf grass biocontrol agents market in 2025 and represented the broadest functional segment across disease, pest, and soil health uses. The segment is projected to expand at a 11.6% CAGR through 2031, well above the overall pace of the turf grass biocontrol agents market. This lead stems from the wide range of organisms, including Trichoderma, Bacillus, and Beauveria bassiana, across both foliar and root-zone programs. The category is also easier to build into preventive schedules because microbial products can be used in rotation, in tank mixes, or in longer seasonal plans.

Biochemical biocontrol agents remain smaller, but they are gaining ground in premium turf settings that want residue-free products with more predictable handling characteristics. Macrobiological control agents, mainly entomopathogenic nematodes, keep a stable role in white grub and related soil pest programs where their efficacy is well understood. Plant extract and natural compound products remain the smallest type segment, but they benefit from a simpler regulatory fit in some pathways and from growing interest in low-residue tools. Research showing more than 95% white grub mortality from a sequenced Metarhizium and Heterorhabditis program indicates that the turf grass biocontrol agents industry is moving toward combination programs rather than single-agent use

Complete Report Scope:

• By Type of Biocontrol Agent
  • Microbial Biocontrol Agents
  • Macrobiological Control Agents
  • Biochemical Biocontrol Agents
  • Plant Extract and Natural Compound Biocontrols
• By Application
  • Golf Courses
  • Sports Fields
  • Landscaping and Residential Lawns
  • Sod Farms
  • Public Parks and Institutional Grounds
• By Formulation
  • Liquid Formulations
  • Granular Formulations
  • Powder Formulations
  • Encapsulated and Suspension Formulations
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Rest of North America
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America accounted for 34.7% of the turf grass biocontrol agents market share in 2025, maintaining its leading position. This dominance is attributed to a well-established professional turf infrastructure, mature biological product distribution channels, and a robust low-risk biopesticide regulatory framework. The Environmental Protection Agency's proposed streamlining of regulations for low-risk biopesticides is projected to sustain product availability in the region. While North America is projected to grow steadily, its growth rate is anticipated to be slower than the global average due to its already mature market. Europe is projected to experience growth driven by regulatory support and increased investment in premium turf. Directive 2009/128/CE continues to promote reduced pesticide usage and stronger integrated pest management practices, providing biological products with a clearer long-term role in professional turf management. The region's growth is further supported by the rising demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly solutions in the turf industry.

The Asia-Pacific region is forecast to be the fastest-growing market for turf grass biocontrol agents, with a projected CAGR of 8.3% through 2031. This growth is supported by the development of golf courses in China, Japan, and Australia, increased construction of sports fields, and a shift toward lower-chemical maintenance practices. The region's rapid urbanization and growing middle-class population are driving investments in recreational facilities, including golf courses and sports complexes, which require high-quality turf management. Governments in the region are also promoting sustainable agricultural and landscaping practices, further encouraging the adoption of biocontrol agents. Additionally, increasing awareness of the environmental and health benefits of biocontrol agents over chemical pesticides is driving market growth. The presence of emerging markets such as India and Southeast Asian countries, where the adoption of biocontrol agents is still in its nascent stage, presents significant growth opportunities for market players.

The Middle East is projected to expand as golf and premium sports venue projects continue in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, where heat and water stress enhance the importance of integrated turf management programs. Africa is forecast to grow at a slower pace due to challenges in cold-chain logistics and specialty distribution. However, gradual demand from sports venues and golf course development is projected to support market growth in the region. The increasing focus on sustainable practices and the development of local distribution networks are projected to gradually address the logistical challenges in Africa, paving the way for steady market growth.

1. Bayer AG
2. BASF SE
3. UPL Limited
4. Corteva Agriscience
5. Koppert Biological Systems B.V.
6. Certis USA LLC
7. Biobest Group NV
8. FMC Corporation
9. Nufarm Limited
10. Valen Biosciences LLC
11. BioWorks, Inc.
12. Lallemand Inc.
13. AMVAC Chemical Corporation
14. SePRO Corporation

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumption and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising regulatory preference for low-residue turf inputs
  • 4.2.2 Replacement cycle from synthetic turf fungicides to biological programs
  • 4.2.3 Growth in golf course and sports field stewardship budgets
  • 4.2.4 Rising disease pressure from climate volatility and heat stress
  • 4.2.5 Microbial strain innovation, shelf-life, and formulation advances
  • 4.2.6 Precision turf monitoring improves biological product timing
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Inconsistent field performance versus conventional chemistries
  • 4.3.2 Higher application discipline and timing requirements
  • 4.3.3 Shorter shelf life and cold-chain sensitivity for some live agents
  • 4.3.4 Fragmented registration pathways across turf uses and countries
• 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.5 Technological Outlook
• 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.6.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.6.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitute Products
  • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Type of Biocontrol Agent
  • 5.1.1 Microbial Biocontrol Agents
  • 5.1.2 Macrobiological Control Agents
  • 5.1.3 Biochemical Biocontrol Agents
  • 5.1.4 Plant Extract and Natural Compound Biocontrols
• 5.2 By Application
  • 5.2.1 Golf Courses
  • 5.2.2 Sports Fields
  • 5.2.3 Landscaping and Residential Lawns
  • 5.2.4 Sod Farms
  • 5.2.5 Public Parks and Institutional Grounds
• 5.3 By Formulation
  • 5.3.1 Liquid Formulations
  • 5.3.2 Granular Formulations
  • 5.3.3 Powder Formulations
  • 5.3.4 Encapsulated and Suspension Formulations
• 5.4 By Geography
  • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Rest of North America
  • 5.4.2 South America
    • 5.4.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.2.2 Rest of South America
  • 5.4.3 Europe
    • 5.4.3.1 Germany
    • 5.4.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.3.3 France
    • 5.4.3.4 Russia
    • 5.4.3.5 Rest of Europe
  • 5.4.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4.1 China
    • 5.4.4.2 India
    • 5.4.4.3 Japan
    • 5.4.4.4 Australia
    • 5.4.4.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.4.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.4.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.4.5.1.3 Turkey
      • 5.4.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.4.5.2 Africa
      • 5.4.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.4.5.2.2 Nigeria
      • 5.4.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global level Overview, Market-level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for Key Companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Bayer AG
  • 6.4.2 BASF SE
  • 6.4.3 UPL Limited
  • 6.4.4 Corteva Agriscience
  • 6.4.5 Koppert Biological Systems B.V.
  • 6.4.6 Certis USA LLC
  • 6.4.7 Biobest Group NV
  • 6.4.8 FMC Corporation
  • 6.4.9 Nufarm Limited
  • 6.4.10 Valen Biosciences LLC
  • 6.4.11 BioWorks, Inc.
  • 6.4.12 Lallemand Inc.
  • 6.4.13 AMVAC Chemical Corporation
  • 6.4.14 SePRO Corporation

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook