자동 세포 처리 시스템 시장 업계 동향과 세계 예측 - 세포치료 처리 스텝별, 사업 규모별, 최종사용자별, 주요 지역별

AUTOMATED CELL PROCESSING SYSTEM MARKET: OVERVIEW

As per Roots Analysis, the global automated cell processing system market valued at USD 220 million in the current year is projected to grow at a CAGR of 16% during the forecast period.

The market sizing and opportunity analysis has been segmented across the following parameters:

Cell Therapy Processing Step

• Apheresis
• Separation
• Expansion
• Harvest
• Fill / Finish
• Cryopreservation
• Thawing

Scale of Operation

• Pre-clinical / Clinical Operations
• Commercial Organizations

End User

• Hospitals / Medical Centers / Clinics / Research Institutes / Academic Institutes
• Cell Therapy Manufacturers / Developers

Key Geographical Regions

• North America
• Europe
• Asia-Pacific
• Latin America
• Middle East and North Africa

AUTOMATED CELL PROCESSING SYSTEM MARKET: GROWTH AND TRENDS

Recently there has been a rise in the number of cell therapies candidates, driven by numerous developmental breakthroughs in the biotechnology industry. In fact, more than 2,000 cell and gene therapy candidates are currently being investigated for the treatment of a myriad of disease indications. Further, the results of FDA approved therapies demonstrated the vast potential of cellular therapies in the treatment of oncological disorders, rare diseases, and chronic diseases. Thus, this therapeutic modality has garnered considerable attention from players engaged in the healthcare industry in the past few years. However, the conventional cell therapy manufacturing process is labor-intensive and time-consuming which results in high cost of production. Moreover, this manual process of cell therapy manufacturing leads to batch-to-batch variation. Consequently, there is an emerging and pressing need for more sophisticated and time efficient solutions for production.

Over the years, several advanced and innovative automation tools and technologies have been developed. These automated and closed cell processing systems have been demonstrated to hold the potential for significant reduction in the cost associated with the manufacturing of advanced cell therapies. One such automated system, namely GMP-In-A Box, offers several advantages, including increased throughput, decreased idle time between batch runs and reduced manual labor. Owing to such benefits of automation, the cell processing systems market is poised to witness lucrative growth in the coming future.

AUTOMATED CELL PROCESSING SYSTEM MARKET: KEY INSIGHTS

The report delves into the current state of the automated cell processing system market and identifies potential growth opportunities within industry. Some key findings from the report include:

• Presently, over 60 innovative, automated and closed systems have been developed by different companies in order to automate various stages of cell therapy development, production, and cryopreservation.
• The market landscape is fragmented, featuring both established players and new entrants, engaged in developing novel technologies with distinct features, for processing cells across different scales of operation.
• Since 2010, many startups, focused on developing automated and closed cell processing systems, have been established; this upcoming domain has captured the interest of both big and small players.
• Majority of the available systems are compliant with the current regulatory requirements; examples include BATON, NANT 001, robotic cell culture systems and the volta loop.
• The increasing interest of stakeholders in this field is also reflected in the recent partnership activity; most recent deals are focused on novel technologies and involve the active participation of both international and indigenous players.

• The number of partnerships in this domain have increased at a CAGR of 24%; more than 70% of these partnerships have been signed since 2018.
• Several deals focused on utilization or integration of SA25 aseptic filling work cell (vanrx pharma systems) were signed for fill / finish of cell therapy products.
• In pursuit of a competitive advantage, equipment developers are presently focusing on the integration of advanced features into their respective products and affiliated offerings.
• An evaluation of more than 300+ stakeholders engaged in the development of cell therapies, including big pharma players, reveals several likely strategic partnership opportunities for equipment providers in this field.
• Given their cost saving potential across different processing steps, we expect the automated and closed cell therapy systems market to grow at an annualized rate of 16% over the next decade.

Example Players in the Automated Cell Processing System Market

• AstraZeneca
• Baxter
• Bayer
• Cytiva (Acquired by Danaher Corporation)
• Cellular Therapeutics
• Lonza
• Merck
• Pall (Acquired by Danaher Corporation)
• Terumo BCT
• ThermoGenesis

AUTOMATED CELL PROCESSING SYSTEM MARKET: RESEARCH COVERAGE

• Market Sizing and Opportunity Analysis: The report features an in-depth analysis of the global automated cell processing system market, focusing on key market segments, including [A] cell therapy processing step, [B] scale of operation, [C] end user and [D] key geographical regions.
• Market Landscape: A comprehensive evaluation of the automated and closed systems, based on several relevant parameters, such as [A] cell therapy processing step, [B] their key features, [C] product specifications, [D] type of cells supported, [E] type of cell culture, [F] scale of operation, [G] application, [H] end users, [I] key support services offered and [J] regulatory certification / accreditations obtained.
• Product Competitiveness Analysis: A comprehensive competitive analysis of automated and closed systems, examining factors, such as [A] supplier power and [B] portfolio-related parameters.
• Company Profiles: In-depth profiles of key players that are engaged in offering automated and closed cell therapy processing systems, focusing on [A] overview of the company, [B] financial information (if available), [C] detailed description of the system(s) they offer and [D] recent developments and an informed future outlook.
• Partnerships and Collaborations: An insightful analysis of the deals inked by stakeholders in the automated cell processing system market, based on several parameters, such as [A] year of partnership, [B] type of partnership, [C] type of therapy, [D] type of cell processing step, [E] key automated and closed cell processing systems, [F] partner's focus area, [G] most active players (in terms of number of partnerships signed), and [H] geographical location of collaborators.
• Big Pharma Initiatives: A comprehensive evaluation of recent initiatives undertaken by big pharma players engaged in the automated cell processing system market.

KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED IN THIS REPORT

• How many companies are currently engaged in this market?
• Which are the leading companies in this market?
• What factors are likely to influence the evolution of this market?
• What is the current and future market size?
• What is the CAGR of this market?
• How is the current and future market opportunity likely to be distributed across key market segments?

REASONS TO BUY THIS REPORT

• The report provides a comprehensive market analysis, offering detailed revenue projections of the overall market and its specific sub-segments. This information is valuable to both established market leaders and emerging entrants.
• Stakeholders can leverage the report to gain a deeper understanding of the competitive dynamics within the market. By analyzing the competitive landscape, businesses can make informed decisions to optimize their market positioning and develop effective go-to-market strategies.
• The report offers stakeholders a comprehensive overview of the market, including key drivers, barriers, opportunities, and challenges. This information empowers stakeholders to stay abreast of market trends and make data-driven decisions to capitalize on growth prospects.

ADDITIONAL BENEFITS

• Complimentary PPT Insights Packs
• Complimentary Excel Data Packs for all Analytical Modules in the Report
• 15% Free Content Customization
• Detailed Report Walkthrough Session with Research Team
• Free Updated report if the report is 6-12 months old or older

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. PREFACE

• 1.1. Scope of the Report
• 1.2. Research Methodology
  • 1.2.1. Research Assumptions
  • 1.2.2. Project Methodology
  • 1.2.3. Forecast Methodology
  • 1.2.4. Robust Quality Control
  • 1.2.5. Key Considerations
    • 1.2.5.1. Demographics
    • 1.2.5.2. Economic Factors
    • 1.2.5.3. Government Regulations
    • 1.2.5.4. Supply Chain
    • 1.2.5.6. COVID Impact / Related Factors
    • 1.2.5.7. Market Access
    • 1.2.5.8. Healthcare Policies
    • 1.2.5.9. Industry Consolidation
• 1.3 Key Questions Answered
• 1.4. Chapter Outlines

2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3. INTRODUCTION

• 3.1. Context and Background
• 3.2. Cell Therapies
• 3.3. Cell Therapy Manufacturing
• 3.4. Key Challenges Associated with Manufacturing Cell Therapies
• 3.5. Overview of Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems
  • 3.5.1. Need for Automated and Closed Cell Processing in Cell Therapy Manufacturing
  • 3.5.2. Advantages and Affiliated Challenges
• 3.6. Key Growth Drivers and Roadblocks
• 3.7. Recent Developments and Upcoming Trends

4. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 4.1. Chapter Overview
• 4.2. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems: Overall Market Landscape
  • 4.2.1. Analysis by Cell Processing Step
  • 4.2.2. Analysis by Types of Cells
  • 4.2.3. Analysis by Type of Culture
  • 4.2.4. Analysis by Scale of Operation
  • 4.2.5. Analysis by Key Features
  • 4.2.6. Analysis by Application Area
  • 4.2.7. Analysis by Regulatory Certifications / Accreditations
  • 4.2.8. Analysis by End User
• 4.3. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems: Developer Landscape
  • 4.3.1. Analysis by Year of Establishment
  • 4.3.2. Analysis by Company Size
  • 4.3.3. Analysis by Type of Support Service(s) Offered
  • 4.3.4. Analysis by Location of Headquarters

5. PRODUCT COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS

• 5.1. Chapter Overview
• 5.2. Assumptions / Key Parameters
• 5.3. Methodology
• 5.4. Product Competitiveness Analysis
  • 5.4.1. Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems for Apheresis
  • 5.4.2. Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems for Separation
  • 5.4.3. Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems for Expansion
  • 5.4.4. Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems for Harvest
  • 5.4.5. Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems for Fill Finish
  • 5.4.6. Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems for Cryopreservation
  • 5.4.7. Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems for Thawing

6. COMPANY PROFILES

• 6.1. Chapter Overview
• 6.2. Cytiva
  • 6.2.1. Company Overview
  • 6.2.2. Product Portfolio
  • 6.2.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
• 6.3. Pall
  • 6.3.1. Company Overview
  • 6.3.2. Product Portfolio
  • 6.3.3. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
• 6.4. Terumo BCT
  • 6.4.1. Company Overview
  • 6.4.2. Product Portfolio
  • 6.4.3. Financial Information
  • 6.4.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook
• 6.5 ThermoGenesis
  • 6.5.1. Company Overview
  • 6.5.2. Product Portfolio
  • 6.5.3. Financial Information
  • 6.5.4. Recent Developments and Future Outlook

7. PARTNERSHIPS

• 7.1. Chapter Overview
• 7.2. Partnership Models
• 7.3. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems: Recent Partnerships
  • 7.3.1. Analysis by Year of Partnership
  • 7.3.2. Analysis by Type of Partnership
  • 7.3.3. Analysis by Type of Therapy
  • 7.3.4. Analysis by Cell Processing Step
  • 7.3.5. Analysis by Type of Automated and Closed Cell Processing Systems
  • 7.3.6. Analysis by Partner's Focus Area
  • 7.3.7. Most Active Players: Analysis by Number of Partnerships
  • 7.3.8. Geographical Analysis
    • 7.3.8.1. Country-Wise Distribution
    • 7.3.8.2. Intercontinental and Intracontinental Agreements

8. BIG PHARMA INITIATIVES IN AUTOMATED AND CLOSED CELL THERAPY PROCESSING SYSTEMS DOMAIN

• 8.1. Chapter Overview
• 8.2. Initiatives Undertaken by Big Pharma Players
  • 8.2.1. Initiatives Undertaken by AbbVie
  • 8.2.2. Initiatives Undertaken by Bristol Myers Squibb
  • 8.2.3. Initiatives Undertaken by Gilead Sciences
  • 8.2.4. Initiatives Undertaken by GlaxoSmithKline
  • 8.2.5. Initiatives Undertaken by Johnson & Johnson
  • 8.2.6. Initiatives Undertaken by Novartis
  • 8.2.7. Initiatives Undertaken by Roche
  • 8.2.8. Initiatives Undertaken by Sanofi
  • 8.2.9. Initiatives Undertaken by Takeda Pharmaceutical
  • 8.2.10. Summary of Big Pharma Initiatives

9. LIKELY PARTNER

• 9.1. Chapter Overview
• 9.2. Scope and Methodology
• 9.3. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems: Potential Strategic Partners for Cell Therapy Development
  • 9.3.1. Dendritic Cell Therapy
  • 9.3.2. Stem Cell Therapy
  • 9.3.3. T-cell Therapy
  • 9.3.4. Natural Killer Cell Therapy
• 9.4. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems: Potential Strategic Partners for Cell Therapy Manufacturing
  • 9.4.1. Dendritic Cell Therapy
  • 9.4.2. Stem Cell Therapy,
  • 9.4.3. T-cell Therapy
  • 9.4.4. Natural Killer Cell Therapy

10. CASE STUDY: COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS USING PARTIALLY AUTOMATED AND FULLY AUTOMATED SYSTEMS

• 10.1. Chapter Overview
• 10.2. Comparative Analysis of Manual, Partially Automated and Fully Automated Cell Processing Systems
• 10.3. Likely Cost Saving Potential for Kymriah(R)
• 10.4. Likely Cost Saving Potential for Yescarata(R)
• 10.5. Cost Saving Potential of Fully Automated Processing Systems: Regional Trends
• 10.6. Concluding Remarks

11. MARKET SIZING AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS

• 11.1. Chapter Overview
• 11.2. Key Assumptions and Methodology
• 11.3. Overall Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, Till 2035
  • 11.3.1. Overall Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market: Distribution by Cell Therapy Processing Step
    • 11.3.1.1. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Apheresis, Till 2035
    • 11.3.1.2. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Separation, Till 2035
    • 11.3.1.3. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Expansion, Till 2035
    • 11.3.1.4. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Harvest, Till 2035
    • 11.3.1.5. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Fill / Finish, Till 2035
    • 11.3.1.6. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Cryopreservation, Till 2035
    • 11.3.1.7. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Thawing, Till 2035
  • 11.3.2. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market: Distribution by Scale of Operation
    • 11.3.2.1. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Pre-clinical / Clinical Operations, Till 2035
    • 11.3.2.2. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Commercial Operations, Till 2035
  • 11.3.3. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market: Distribution by End User
    • 11.3.3.1. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Hospitals / Medical Centers / Clinics / Research Institutes / Academic Institutes, Till 2035
    • 11.3.3.2. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market for Cell Therapy Manufacturers / Developers, Till 2035
  • 11.3.4. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market: Distribution by Key Geographic Regions
    • 11.3.4.1. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market in North America, Till 2035
    • 11.3.4.2. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market in Europe, Till 2035
    • 11.3.4.3. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market in Asia-Pacific, Till 2035
    • 11.3.4.4. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market in Latin America (LATAM), Till 2035
    • 11.3.4.5. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market in Middle East North America (MENA), Till 2035

12. CONCLUSION

• 12.1. Chapter Overview
• 12.2. Key Takeaways

13. INTERVIEW / SURVEY TRANSCRIPT(S)

14. APPENDIX 1: TABULATED DATA

15. APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS