|
시장보고서
상품코드
2029274
<2026> 리튬이온 2차전지 Cell Cost Price Analysis & Outlook<2026> Lithium-ion Battery Cell Cost & Price Analysis and Outlook |
||||||
리튬이온 2차전지(LIB)의 원가 및 판가 분석과 향후 전망은 전기차 시장의 대중화를 결정짓는 가장 핵심적인 요소입니다. 전기차 생산 원가의 30-50%를 차지하는 배터리 가격을 낮추기 위해 업계는 치열한 기술 경쟁과 공급망 내재화를 추진하고 있습니다.
2024년 말-2025년 기준, 중국 내 LFP 셀 가격은 kWh당 50-60달러 수준까지 하락하여 100달러를 상회하는 NCM 배터리 대비 20-30% 이상 저렴한 수준에 와있으며, 2025년 기준 리튬이온 2차전지 셀 가격은 중국산 LFP(리튬인산철)가 한국산 NCM(니켈·코발트·망간)보다 눈에 띄게 저렴하며, 중국 내 생산 비용 우위로 인해 가격 차이가 점차 벌어지는 추세입니다.
리튬이온 2차전지 폼팩터(Form Factor)별로도 EV는 파우치/원통형/각형이 경쟁하는 구도이며, ESS는 각형(LFP)이, IT 기기는 파우치형이 주류를 이루고 있으며, Non-IT 시장에서는 원통형이 대세로 자리잡고 있습니다.
중국 CATL은 2025년 기준, 글로벌 전기차 리튬이온 배터리 시장에서 약 39% 내외의 점유율로 독보적인 1위를 유지하며 2위권과 격차를 벌리고 있습니다. LG에너지솔루션, SK온, 삼성SDI는 한국 3사 합산 점유율이 15%대로 다소 밀려나며 기술 초격차 및 원가 절감 과제를 안고 있습니다.
2026년 배터리 시장은 중국의 저가 LFP 각형 셀이 시장의 최저가(Low-end)를, 한국의 고효율 원통형(4680) 및 NCM이 중·고가(Mid-High-end) 시장을 공략하는 구도가 될 전망입니다.
향후 리튬이온 2차전지 주도권을 잡기위한 한중일 주요 업체의 치열한 경쟁이 예상되며, 누가 Cell Cost를 효과적으로 절감하고 이윤을 극대화 하는가에 따라 시장의 흐름도 크게 바뀔 것으로 예측이 되므로 각 메이저업체별 Cell Cost/Price Analysis & Outlook 이 매우 중요하습니다.
본 보고서는 최근 5개년의 리튬이온 2차전지 원가 분석을 통하여 폼팩터별, Application별, Chemistry별, 국가별 가격 트렌드를 살펴보고 주요 제조사들의 재료비, 가공비 분석을 통해 리튬이온 2차전지의 셀 가격 흐름이 어떻게 바뀔지 살펴보고 차기 시장에 대응할 수 있는 내용을 담고 있습니다.
1장에서는 리튬 2차전지 원가 및 가격 개요를 설명하였고,
2장에서는 . LIB Cost/Price 결정 요소 분석을 통해 Material Cost, Process Cost 를 상세히 알아보고,
3장에서는 EV용 LIB의 원가/가격 구조를 폼팩터별, Application별, Chemistry별, 국가별로 분석하였고,
4장에서는 ESS용 LIB의 원가/가격 구조를 폼팩터별, Application별, Chemistry별, 국가별로 분석하였고,
5장에서는 Small size IT용 및 Non-IT용 LIB의 원가/가격 구조를 폼팩터별, Application별, Chemistry별, 국가별로 분석하였고,
6-7장에서는 2차전지 원가/가격 비교 및 Analysis 종합 분석 정리 및 이차전지 원가/가격 전망을 하였습니다.
리튬이온 2차전지와 전기차, ESS 시장은 미래 성장이 확실히 담보되는 신 성장 동력입니다. 리튬이온 2차전지 Cell Cost/Price Analysis & Outlook에 대한 SNE 리서치에서의 조사 내용이 배터리 생산 업체와 관련 소재 업체, 그리고 2차전지를 사용하는 고객사들에게 유용한 정보가 될 수 있기를 바래봅니다.
목차
1. 리튬 2차전지 원가 및 가격 개요
- 1.1 원가의 기본 구조
- 1.2 2차전지 산업 Value Chain
- 1.3 LIB Cell Form Factor(FF)별 구성요소
- 1.4 LIB Cell의 Application별 특징
- 1.5 양극재 Chemistry별 구분
- 1.6 LIB Cell의 FF/Application/Chemistry종합
2. LIB Cost/Price 결정 요소 분석
- 2.1 리튬이온 2차전지 요구 특성 vs. Cost
- 2.2 리튬이온 2차전지 원가/가격 구조 Example
- 2.3 LIB 재료비 분석 Material Cost Analysis
- 2.3.1 양극재 Cathode AM
- 2.3.2 음극재 Anode AM
- 2.3.3 분리막 Separator
- 2.3.4 전해질 Electrolyte
- 2.3.5 양극,음극 부자재 Binder, Cond. Agent, NMP
- 2.3.6 양극,음극 기재 Al Foil(알박), Cu Foil(동박)
- 2.3.7 Packaging (Can, Al Pouch, Tab, Tape…)
- 2.3.8 재료비 Loss by Yield rate
- 2.4 LIB 공정비(가공비) 분석 Process Cost Analysis
- 2.4.1 직접 인건비 Direct Labor Cost
- 2.4.2 용력비 Utility Cost 전기요금
- 2.4.3 감가상각비 Depreciation
- 2.5 Others
- 2.5.1 판관비 SG&A
- 2.5.2 R&D Cost
- 2.6 영업 이익 OPM, Operating Profit Margin
3. EV용 LIB의 원가/가격 구조
- 3.1 연도별 추이, 21년-25년
- 3.2 BEV vs. PHEV vs. HEV
- 3.3 Form Factor별 비교, Cyl vs. Pou vs. Pri
- 3.4 CAM Chemistry별 비교, NCx vs. LFP
- 3.5 국가별 비교, KR vs. CN vs. JP
- 3.6 Cyl 2170 vs Cyl 4680
- 3.7 Cylindrical EV
- 3.7.1 Cyl 내에서의 비교
- 3.7.2 Cyl 2170 BEV
- 3.7.3 Cyl 2170 PHEV
- 3.7.4 Cyl 2170 HEV
- 3.7.5 Cyl 4680 BEV
- 3.8 Pouch EV
- 3.8.1 Pouch 내에서의 비교
- 3.8.2 Pouch BEV
- 3.8.3 Pouch PHEV
- 3.8.4 Pouch HEV
- 3.9 Prismatic EV
- 3.9.1 Prismatic내에서의 비교
- 3.9.2 Prismatic BEV
- 3.9.3 Prismatic PHEV
- 3.9.4 Prismatic HEV
4. ESS용 LIB의 원가/가격 구조
- 4.1 연도별 추이, 21년-25년
- 4.2 Form Factor별 비교, Cyl vs. Pou vs. Pri
- 4.3 CAM Chemistry별 비교, NCx vs. LFP
- 4.4 국가별 비교, KR vs. CN vs. JP
- 4.5 Cylindrical ESS
- 4.5.1 Cyl 내에서의 비교
- 4.5.2 Cyl 2170 ESS NCx
- 4.5.3 Cyl 2170 ESS LFP
- 4.6 Pouch ESS
- 4.6.1 Pouch 내에서의 비교
- 4.6.2 Pouch ESS NCx
- 4.6.3 Pouch ESS LFP
- 4.7 Prismatic ESS
- 4.7.1 Prismatic내에서의 비교
- 4.7.2 Prismatic ESS NCx
- 4.7.3 Prismatic ESS NCx
5. Small size IT용 및 Non-IT용 LIB의 원가/가격 구조
- 5.1 연도별 추이, 21년-25년
- 5.2 Form Factor별 비교, Cyl vs. Pou
- 5.3 CAM Chemistry별 비교, NCx vs. LFP
- 5.4 국가별 비교, KR vs. CN vs. JP
- 5.5 Cylindrical Non-IT
- 5.5.1 Cyl 내에서의 비교
- 5.5.2 Cyl 2170 Non-IT NCx
- 5.5.3 Cyl 2170 Non-IT LFP
- 5.6 Pouch IT
- 5.6.1 Pouch 내에서의 비교
- 5.6.2 Pouch IT NCx
6. 2차전지 원가/가격 비교 및 Analysis
- 6.1 Application별 비교
- (‘2025년 기준) NCX Cell
- (2023-’25년 기준) LFP Cell
- 6.2 Form Factor별 비교, Cyl vs. Pou vs Pri
- 2025년 BEV NCX Cell
- ESS LFP Cell
- Small Size Non-IT Cyl(NCX) vs. IT Pou(LCO)
- 6.3 CAM Chemistry별 비교, NCx vs. LFP
- BEV NCX vs. BEV LFP
- ESS NCX vs. ESS LFP
- 6.4 제조 업체별 비교
- BEV Cylindrical) LGES vs. SDI vs. Pana. vs. EVE
- BEV Pouch LGES vs. SK On vs. Farasis
- BEV Prismatic NCX SDI vs. CATL vs. CN Others
- ESS Prismatic LFP CATL vs. EVE
7. 이차전지 원가/가격 Outlook
- 7.1 BEV NCX Cell Price Outlook, 2021-2030
- 7.2 BEV LFP Cell Price Outlook, 2021-2030
- 7.3 ESS LFP Cell Price Outlook, 2021-2030
- 7.4 BEV, ESS Cell Overall, 2021-2030
- 7.5 Secondary Battery Cell Price Outlook (LIB, ASB, SIB) 2021-2030
The cost and pricing outlook of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is one of the most critical factors determining the mass adoption of electric vehicles. To reduce battery costs, which account for approximately 30–50% of EV production costs, industry players are pursuing intense technological competition and supply chain localization.
As of late 2024 to 2025, LFP cell prices in China have fallen to around USD 50–60/kWh, making them more than 20–30% cheaper than NCM batteries, which remain above USD 100/kWh. In 2025, Chinese-made LFP batteries continue to be significantly less expensive than Korean-made NCM batteries, with the cost gap widening due to China's manufacturing cost advantages.
Battery form factor competition also varies by application. In the EV market, pouch, cylindrical, and prismatic cells compete across different vehicle segments. In the ESS market, prismatic LFP batteries dominate, while pouch cells remain the mainstream choice for IT devices. In non-IT applications, cylindrical batteries have emerged as the dominant form factor.
As of 2025, China’s CATL maintains a dominant position in the global EV lithium-ion battery market with a market share of approximately 39%, widening the gap with its closest competitors. Meanwhile, the combined market share of Korea’s three major battery manufacturers - LG Energy Solution, SK On, and Samsung SDI - has declined to the mid-teen range, highlighting the need for greater technological differentiation and cost reduction.
In 2026, the battery market is expected to be characterized by Chinese low-cost prismatic LFP cells dominating the low-end segment, while Korean high-efficiency cylindrical (4680) and NCM batteries target the mid- to high-end market.
Intense competition among major battery manufacturers in China, Korea, and Japan is expected to continue as they compete for leadership in the lithium-ion battery industry. Market dynamics will increasingly depend on each company's ability to effectively reduce cell costs and maximize profitability, making Cell Cost/Price Analysis & Outlook for major manufacturers a critical area of focus.
This report analyzes lithium-ion battery cost structures over the past five years, examining price trends by form factor, application, chemistry, and country. Through detailed analysis of material and processing costs across major manufacturers, it provides insights into future cell price trends and strategic implications for the next phase of market development.
- Chapter 1 provides an overview of lithium-ion battery costs and pricing.
- Chapter 2 examines the key factors influencing LIB cost and pricing, with detailed analysis of material costs and processing costs.
- Chapter 3 analyzes the cost and pricing structure of EV batteries by form factor, application, chemistry, and country.
- Chapter 4 analyzes the cost and pricing structure of ESS batteries by form factor, application, chemistry, and country.
- Chapter 5 analyzes the cost and pricing structure of small-size IT and non-IT batteries by form factor, application, chemistry, and country.
Chapters 6 and 7 provide a comprehensive comparison and analysis of battery costs and pricing, along with future cost and price outlooks for lithium-ion batteries.
Lithium-ion batteries, EVs, and the ESS market are key growth engines with strong long-term growth potential. We hope that SNE Research’s findings on Lithium-Ion Battery Cell Cost/Price Analysis & Outlook will serve as a valuable resource for battery manufacturers, material suppliers, and battery end-users seeking to better understand market trends and future developments.
Table of Contents
1. Overview of Lithium-ion Battery Cost and Pricing
- 1.1 Basic Cost Structure
- 1.2 Lithium-ion Battery Industry Value Chain
- 1.3 Components by LIB Cell Form Factor (FF)
- 1.4 Application-specific Characteristics of LIB Cells
- 1.5 Classification by Cathode Chemistry
- 1.6 Integrated Overview of LIB Cell Form Factor, Application, and Chemistry
2. Analysis of Key Drivers of LIB Cost and Pricing
- 2.1 Performance Requirements vs. Cost of Lithium-ion Batteries
- 2.2 Example of LIB Cost and Pricing Structure
- 2.3 LIB Material Cost Analysis
- 2.3.1 Cathode Active Material (CAM)
- 2.3.2 Anode Active Material (AAM)
- 2.3.3 Separator
- 2.3.4 Electrolyte
- 2.3.5 Cathode/Anode Additives (Binder, Conductive Agent, NMP)
- 2.3.6 Cathode/Anode Current Collectors (Al Foil, Cu Foil)
- 2.3.7 Packaging (Can, Al Pouch, Tab, Tape…)
- 2.3.8 Material Cost Loss by Yield rate
- 2.4 LIB Process Cost Analysis
- 2.4.1 Direct Labor Cost
- 2.4.2 Utility Cost (Electricity, etc.)
- 2.4.3 Depreciation
- 2.5 Operating Profit (OPM, Operating Profit Margin)
3. Cost and Pricing Structure of EV LIB
- 3.1 Yearly Trends (2021–2025)
- 3.2 BEV vs. PHEV vs. HEV
- 3.3 Comparison by Form Factor (Cyl vs. Pou vs. Pri)
- 3.4 Comparison by CAM Chemistry (NCx vs. LFP)
- 3.5 Comparison by Country (KR vs. CN vs. JP)
- 3.6 Cyl 2170 vs Cyl4.80
- 3.7 Cylindrical Cells for EV
- 3.7.1 Comparison within Cyl
- 3.7.2 Cyl 2170 for BEVs
- 3.7.3 Cyl 2170 for PHEVs
- 3.7.4 Cyl 2170 for HEVs
- 3.7.5 Cyl4.80 for BEVs
- 3.8 Pouch Cells for EV
- 3.8.1 Comparison within Pouch Cells
- 3.8.2 Pouch Cells for BEVs
- 3.8.3 Pouch Cells for PHEVs
- 3.8.4 Pouch Cells for HEVs
- 3.9 Prismatic Cells for EV
- 3.9.1 Comparison within Prismatic Cells
- 3.9.2 Prismatic Cells for BEVs
- 3.9.3 Prismatic Cells for PHEVs
- 3.9.4 Prismatic Cells for HEVs
4. Cost and Pricing Structure of ESS LIB
- 4.1 Yearly Trends (2021–2025)
- 4.2 Comparison by Form Factor (Cyl vs. Pou vs. Pri)
- 4.3 Comparison by Cathode Chemistry (NCx vs. LFP)
- 4.4 Comparison by Country (KR vs. CN vs. JP)
- 4.5 Cylindrical Cells for ESS
- 4.5.1 Comparison within Cylindrical Cells
- 4.5.2 Cylindrical 2170 for ESS (NCx)
- 4.5.3 Cylindrical 2170 for ESS (LFP)
- 4.6 Pouch Cells for ESS
- 4.6.1 Comparison within Pouch Cells
- 4.6.2 Pouch Cells for ESS (NCx)
- 4.6.3 Pouch Cells for ESS (LFP)
- 4.7 Prismatic Cells for ESS
- 4.7.1 Comparison within Prismatic Cells
- 4.7.2 Prismatic Cells for ESS (NCx)
- 4.7.3 Prismatic Cells for ESS (LFP)
5. Cost and Pricing Structure of LIBs for Small-sized IT and Non-IT Applications
- 5.1 Yearly Trends (2021–2025)
- 5.2 Comparison by Form Factor (Cyl vs. Pou)
- 5.3 Comparison by Cathode Chemistry (NCx vs. LFP)
- 5.4 Comparison by Country (KR vs. CN vs. JP)
- 5.5 Cylindrical Cells for Non-IT
- 5.5.1 Comparison within Cylindrical Cells
- 5.5.2 Cyl 2170 for Non-IT (NCx)
- 5.5.3 Cyl 2170 for Non-IT (LFP)
- 5.6 Pouch IT
- 5.6.1 Comparison within Pouch Cells
- 5.6.2 Pouch Cells for IT (NCx)
6. Comparative Analysis of LIB Cost and Pricing
- 6.1 Comparison by Application
- NCx Cells (as of 2025)
- LFP Cells (2023–2025)
- 6.2 Comparison by Form Factor (Cylindrical vs. Pouch vs. Prismatic)
- BEV NCx Cells (2025)
- ESS LFP Cells
- Small Sized Non-IT Cyl(NCX) vs. IT Pou(LCO)
- 6.3 Comparison by Cathode Chemistry (NCx vs. LFP)
- BEV NCX vs. BEV LFP
- ESS NCX vs. ESS LFP
- 6.4 Comparison by Manufacturer
- BEV Cylindrical: LGES vs. SDI vs. Pana. vs. EVE
- BEV Pouch: LGES vs. SK On vs. Farasis
- BEV Prismatic (NCX): SDI vs. CATL vs. Other Chinese Players
- ESS Prismatic (LFP) CATL vs. EVE
7. Lithium-ion Battery Cost and Pricing Outlook
- 7.1 BEV NCX Cell Price Outlook (2021~2030)
- 7.2 BEV LFP Cell Price Outlook (2021~2030)
- 7.3 ESS LFP Cell Price Outlook (2021~2030)
- 7.4 Overall BEV and ESS Cell Price Outlook (2021–2030)
- 7.5 Secondary Battery Cell Price Outlook (LIB, ASB, SIB) (2021–2030)
