농업용 포장 시장 - 세계 산업 규모, 점유율, 동향, 기회, 예측 : 제품별, 재료별, 용도별, 지역별, 경쟁별(2019-2029년)

Global Agricultural Packaging Market was valued at USD 5.06 billion in 2023 and will see an steady growth in the forecast period at a CAGR of 5.01% through 2029. Agricultural packaging refers to the packaging materials, containers, and solutions specifically designed for storing, transporting, and protecting agricultural products throughout the supply chain, from farm to market. Agricultural packaging plays a crucial role in preserving the quality, freshness, and integrity of various agricultural commodities, including fruits, vegetables, grains, seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, animal feed, and other farm produce. Agricultural packaging serves to protect agricultural products from physical damage, contamination, moisture, pests, and environmental factors during handling, storage, and transportation. Packaging materials such as bags, boxes, crates, pallets, bins, and wraps provide a protective barrier to maintain product quality and prevent spoilage or deterioration. Proper packaging helps extend the shelf life and preserve the freshness, flavor, and nutritional value of agricultural products. Packaging solutions with barrier properties against moisture, oxygen, light, and temperature fluctuations help minimize oxidation, microbial growth, and enzymatic reactions that contribute to product degradation and spoilage. Agricultural packaging facilitates efficient handling, loading, unloading, and transportation of products within the supply chain. Packaging formats such as bulk bags, pallet containers, and bins allow for easy stacking, palletization, and movement of products using forklifts, pallet jacks, and conveyor systems, streamlining logistics operations and reducing labor costs.

Innovations in packaging materials, design, and technology enhance the functionality, durability, and sustainability of agricultural packaging solutions. Advanced packaging technologies such as modified atmosphere packaging, active packaging, and smart packaging systems improve product quality, extend shelf life, and reduce food waste. Stringent regulatory requirements and food safety standards mandate the use of high-quality packaging materials and processes to ensure the safety and integrity of agricultural products. Compliance with regulatory standards drives the adoption of packaging solutions that meet food safety requirements and maintain product quality and freshness. Changing consumer preferences, including preferences for convenience, sustainability, and product transparency, influence packaging choices in the agricultural sector. Packaging serves as a key element of brand differentiation and marketing strategies, allowing companies to communicate product attributes, enhance brand visibility, and attract consumers.

Key Market Drivers

Technological Advancements

Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) involves altering the atmosphere surrounding a product inside the package to extend its shelf life. In agricultural packaging, MAP is used to control oxygen, carbon dioxide, and humidity levels to slow down microbial growth and maintain product freshness. Active packaging systems incorporate active components such as oxygen scavengers, moisture absorbers, antimicrobial agents, and ethylene absorbers into the packaging material. These components actively interact with the product or its environment to enhance product quality, extend shelf life, and prevent spoilage.

Smart packaging solutions integrate sensors, indicators, and data monitoring technologies into packaging materials to provide real-time information about product conditions, such as temperature, humidity, and freshness. Smart packaging enables improved product traceability, quality control, and consumer safety throughout the supply chain. Nanotechnology-based packaging materials offer enhanced barrier properties, mechanical strength, and antimicrobial properties compared to traditional packaging materials. Nanoparticles can be incorporated into packaging films and coatings to improve shelf life, prevent contamination, and enhance product safety. Advances in biodegradable and compostable packaging materials offer sustainable alternatives to traditional plastic packaging. Biopolymers derived from renewable resources such as corn starch, sugarcane, and cellulose are biodegradable and compostable, reducing environmental impact and promoting circular economy principles.

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and Near Field Communication (NFC) technologies enable automatic identification and tracking of agricultural products throughout the supply chain. RFID tags and NFC labels attached to packaging containers facilitate inventory management, supply chain visibility, and anti-counterfeiting efforts. Bio-based films and coatings derived from renewable resources such as plant-based polymers and natural waxes offer sustainable alternatives to petroleum-based packaging materials. These materials provide excellent barrier properties, moisture resistance, and mechanical strength while reducing dependency on fossil fuels. Active Modified Atmosphere Packaging (AMAP) combines MAP technology with oxygen scavengers or carbon dioxide emitters to create an optimal gas environment inside the package. This innovative packaging solution helps maintain product freshness, extend shelf life, and preserve nutritional quality without the need for preservatives or additives. This factor will help in the development of the Global Agricultural Packaging Market.

Increase in Consumer Preferences and Brand Differentiation

Consumer preferences influence the types of agricultural products they purchase and how those products are packaged. For instance, consumers may prefer fruits and vegetables packaged in eco-friendly materials such as compostable trays or recyclable containers. They may also look for packaging that offers convenience features like resealable closures or portion control. Consumers increasingly seek transparency regarding the origin, production methods, and sustainability practices associated with the agricultural products they purchase. Packaging that provides clear labeling, product information, and branding helps consumers make informed choices and build trust in the brand.

Growing awareness of environmental issues and sustainability concerns drive consumer demand for eco-friendly packaging solutions in agriculture. Consumers prefer packaging made from renewable resources, recycled materials, or biodegradable plastics to minimize environmental impact and support sustainable practices. Busy lifestyles and on-the-go consumption patterns influence consumer preferences for convenient and portable packaging formats in agriculture. Packaging solutions such as pouches, single-serve portions, and snack packs cater to consumers' desire for convenience, ease of use, and portion control. Packaging serves as a key tool for brand differentiation and marketing in the agricultural sector. Unique packaging designs, logos, colors, and branding elements help companies stand out from competitors, attract consumer attention, and build brand recognition and loyalty.

Well-designed packaging that conveys quality, freshness, and premium attributes enhances the perceived value of agricultural products in the eyes of consumers. Packaging formats that maintain product integrity, protect against damage or spoilage, and enhance shelf appeal contribute to positive consumer experiences and repeat purchases. Consumers are drawn to packaging that offers innovative features and functionalities, such as easy-open seals, resealable closures, microwaveable options, and portion-control packaging. These features enhance user experience, convenience, and usability, driving consumer preference and demand. Packaging plays a critical role in ensuring the safety, hygiene, and integrity of agricultural products from farm to table. Consumers prioritize packaging that provides tamper-evident seals, barrier protection against contaminants, and food safety certifications to safeguard their health and well-being. This factor will pace up the demand of the Global Agricultural Packaging Market.

Rising Sustainability Initiatives and Environmental Concerns

Increasing awareness of environmental issues, such as plastic pollution, deforestation, and climate change, has led consumers, businesses, and governments to prioritize sustainability in packaging. Sustainable agricultural packaging aims to minimize environmental impact by reducing resource consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste generation throughout the packaging lifecycle. Consumers prefer agricultural products packaged in eco-friendly materials that are renewable, recyclable, biodegradable, or compostable. Packaging made from materials such as recycled paper, bioplastics, bamboo, and plant-based fibers aligns with consumers' values and sustainability preferences, driving demand for environmentally friendly packaging solutions.

Sustainable agricultural packaging supports the transition to a circular economy, where materials are reused, recycled, or repurposed to minimize waste and resource depletion. Packaging designed with recyclability, compostability, and biodegradability in mind facilitates the recovery and recycling of packaging materials, promoting resource conservation and waste reduction. Regulatory initiatives and standards related to environmental sustainability and packaging waste management incentivize businesses to adopt sustainable packaging practices in agriculture. Compliance with regulations such as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws and packaging directives encourages the adoption of eco-friendly packaging materials and practices to meet environmental targets and legal requirements. Companies that demonstrate a commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship through their packaging practices build trust and loyalty among consumers. Sustainable packaging initiatives enhance brand reputation, differentiate products in the marketplace, and attract environmentally conscious consumers who prioritize sustainability in their purchasing decisions.

Sustainable agricultural packaging extends beyond the product to encompass the entire supply chain, including sourcing, manufacturing, distribution, and disposal. Adopting sustainable packaging practices throughout the supply chain promotes transparency, accountability, and ethical sourcing of materials, contributing to overall supply chain sustainability and resilience. Sustainability initiatives drive innovation and collaboration among stakeholders in the agricultural packaging industry. Companies invest in research and development to develop new materials, technologies, and packaging formats that minimize environmental impact and enhance sustainability performance. Collaboration across the value chain facilitates knowledge sharing, best practices, and continuous improvement in sustainable packaging solutions. This factor will accelerate the demand of the Global Agricultural Packaging Market.

Key Market Challenges

Supply Chain Disruptions

Disruptions in the supply chain can lead to shortages of raw materials used in agricultural packaging production. Fluctuations in supply and demand, transportation bottlenecks, and geopolitical tensions can disrupt the availability and pricing of packaging materials such as paper, plastics, adhesives, and coatings, affecting production schedules and cost structures for packaging manufacturers. Supply chain disruptions, including port congestion, shipping delays, and freight capacity constraints, can hinder the transportation of packaging materials and finished products across domestic and international markets. Logistics challenges and disruptions in transportation networks impact delivery times, inventory management, and customer satisfaction, leading to increased costs and operational inefficiencies for agricultural packaging companies. Supply chain disruptions can disrupt production operations and cause capacity constraints for agricultural packaging manufacturers. Workforce shortages, factory closures, equipment breakdowns, and regulatory restrictions can impede production processes, reduce output levels, and delay order fulfillment, adversely affecting supply chain continuity and customer relationships. Supply chain disruptions may compromise the quality, consistency, and compliance of agricultural packaging materials and products. Inconsistent sourcing, substitution of materials, and deviations from quality standards can result in non-conforming packaging materials that fail to meet regulatory requirements or customer specifications, leading to product recalls, liability risks, and reputational damage for packaging manufacturers.

Competition and Pricing Pressures

The agricultural packaging market is highly competitive, with numerous players vying for market share. Manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors compete based on factors such as product quality, innovation, pricing, branding, and customer service. Intense competition can lead to commoditization of packaging products and services, making it challenging for companies to differentiate themselves and maintain profit margins. Price competition among agricultural packaging companies often leads to price wars and margin compression. Pressure to offer competitive pricing to win contracts and retain customers can erode profit margins and financial viability for companies operating in the market. Price sensitivity among buyers exacerbates pricing pressures and limits opportunities for price increases to offset rising costs. Low switching costs in the agricultural packaging market make it easy for customers to switch suppliers or source packaging materials from alternative sources. Customers may prioritize cost savings over brand loyalty or long-term relationships, making it challenging for companies to retain customers and secure long-term contracts. These dynamic increases competition and pricing pressures in the market. Globalization of the agricultural packaging market expands the pool of competitors and intensifies pricing pressures. Market saturation in some segments and regions further heightens competition as companies vie for market share and seek new growth opportunities. Companies must navigate global competition, regional dynamics, and market saturation to maintain competitiveness and profitability. In price-sensitive markets, companies may resort to price-based differentiation strategies to gain a competitive edge. However, competing solely on price can erode brand value, compromise product quality, and undermine long-term sustainability. Balancing competitive pricing with value-added services, product innovation, and customer relationships is essential to differentiate offerings and mitigate pricing pressures.

Key Market Trends

Shift towards Flexible Packaging

Flexible packaging offers versatility and adaptability, making it suitable for a wide range of agricultural products, including grains, seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, animal feed, and fresh produce. Flexible packaging formats such as pouches, bags, wraps, and films can be customized in terms of size, shape, and functionality to meet specific packaging requirements and product characteristics. Flexible packaging is lightweight and space-efficient compared to rigid packaging formats such as cans, bottles, and jars. Its lightweight properties reduce transportation costs, minimize carbon emissions, and optimize storage space throughout the supply chain, offering economic and environmental benefits for agricultural producers, distributors, and retailers. Flexible packaging provides effective protection and preservation for agricultural products by offering barrier properties against moisture, oxygen, light, and contaminants. High-performance barrier films and laminates help extend the shelf life, maintain product freshness, and preserve nutritional quality, ensuring product integrity and consumer satisfaction. Flexible packaging formats such as stand-up pouches, resealable bags, and single-serve packets offer convenience features that appeal to consumers. Easy-open seals, tear notches, and resealable closures enhance user experience, facilitate portion control, and promote on-the-go consumption, meeting the evolving needs and lifestyles of modern consumers.

Segmental Insights

Product Insights

The Pouches & Bags segment is projected to experience rapid growth in the Global Agricultural Packaging Market during the forecast period. Pouches and bags offer convenience and flexibility in packaging agricultural products such as seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and animal feed. These packaging formats are easy to handle, store, and transport, making them preferred choices for farmers, distributors, and retailers. Pouches and bags provide effective protection against moisture, light, oxygen, and other environmental factors that can degrade the quality and efficacy of agricultural products. By maintaining product freshness and integrity, pouches and bags help prolong shelf life and preserve product quality from farm to market. Pouches and bags can be easily customized in terms of size, shape, material, and printing design to meet specific packaging requirements and branding preferences. Customized packaging allows agricultural companies to differentiate their products, enhance brand visibility, and communicate product information and marketing messages effectively to consumers.

Regional Insights

North America emerged as the dominant region in the Global Agricultural Packaging market in 2023. North America boasts a substantial agricultural sector, with countries like the United States and Canada being major producers of a wide variety of crops, including grains, fruits, vegetables, and livestock. The size and diversity of the agricultural industry create significant demand for packaging materials and solutions to protect and transport agricultural products throughout the supply chain. North America is home to advanced research and development facilities, as well as innovative packaging companies that continuously develop and commercialize new packaging solutions tailored to the needs of the agricultural sector. The region's emphasis on technological innovation and investment in packaging technologies contribute to its leadership in the agricultural packaging market. North America has stringent regulatory standards governing food safety, packaging materials, and environmental sustainability. Compliance with regulatory requirements is a top priority for agricultural producers and packaging manufacturers operating in the region. The implementation of rigorous quality control measures and adherence to regulatory standards enhance the credibility and competitiveness of North American agricultural packaging products in domestic and international markets.

Key Market Players

Mondi plc

Proampac

Pactiv Evergreen Inc.

NNZ BV

Sonoco Products Company

BAG Corporation

Greif International Holding B.V.

Amcor plc

Anderson Packaging Inc.

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Agricultural Packaging Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Agricultural Packaging Market, By Product:

Pouches & Bags Drums Bottles & Cans Others

Agricultural Packaging Market, By Material:

Plastic Metal Paper and Paperboard Composite Materials Others

Agricultural Packaging Market, By Application:

Fertilizers Pesticides Seeds Others

Agricultural Packaging Market, By Region:

North America

United States

Canada

Mexico

Europe

Germany

United Kingdom

France

Italy

Spain

Asia-Pacific

China

Japan

India

Australia

South Korea

South America

Brazil

Argentina

Colombia

Middle East & Africa

South Africa

Saudi Arabia

UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Agricultural Packaging Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Agricultural Packaging market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Product (Pouches & Bags, Drums, Bottles & Cans, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Material (Plastic, Metal, Paper and Paperboard, Composite Materials, Others)
  • 5.2.3. By Application (Fertilizers, Pesticides, Seeds, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Region
  • 5.2.5. By Company (2023)
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Product
  • 6.2.2. By Material
  • 6.2.3. By Application
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Material
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 6.3.2. Canada Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Material
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 6.3.3. Mexico Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Material
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Application

7. Europe Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Product
  • 7.2.2. By Material
  • 7.2.3. By Application
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. Germany Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Material
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.2. United Kingdom Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Material
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.3. Italy Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecasty
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Material
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.4. France Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Material
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Application
  • 7.3.5. Spain Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Product
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Material
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Application

8. Asia-Pacific Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Product
  • 8.2.2. By Material
  • 8.2.3. By Application
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Material
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.2. India Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Material
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.3. Japan Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Material
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.4. South Korea Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Material
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Application
  • 8.3.5. Australia Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Product
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Material
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Application

9. South America Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Product
  • 9.2.2. By Material
  • 9.2.3. By Application
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Material
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Material
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Material
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Application

10. Middle East and Africa Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Product
  • 10.2.2. By Material
  • 10.2.3. By Application
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Material
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Application
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Material
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Application
  • 10.3.3. UAE Agricultural Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Product
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Material
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Application

11. Market Dynamics

11.1 Drivers

11.2 Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

13. Global Agricultural Packaging Market: SWOT Analysis

14. Competitive Landscape

• 14.1. Mondi plc
  • 14.1.1. Business Overview
  • 14.1.2. Product Offerings
  • 14.1.3. Recent Developments
  • 14.1.4. Key Personnel
  • 14.1.5. SWOT Analysis
• 14.2. Proampac
• 14.3. Pactiv Evergreen Inc.
• 14.4. NNZ BV
• 14.5. Sonoco Products Company
• 14.6. BAG Corporation
• 14.7. Greif International Holding B.V.
• 14.8. Amcor plc
• 14.9. Anderson Packaging Inc.

15. Strategic Recommendations

16. About Us & Disclaimer