농약 포장 시장 : 세계 산업 규모, 점유율, 동향, 기회, 예측, 제품 유형별, 재료 유형별, 화학물질별, 지역별, 경쟁별(2020-2030년)

Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market was valued at USD 4.69 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 6.16 Billion in the forecast period with a CAGR of 4.63% through 2030. The Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market is witnessing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for effective packaging solutions that ensure the safe storage, handling, and transport of agrochemicals. With the rising use of herbicides, pesticides, fungicides, and fertilizers to support the growing global agricultural industry, the need for innovative packaging formats has surged. Packaging plays a critical role in preventing chemical degradation, leakage, and contamination while enhancing the shelf life of these products. Increasing emphasis on sustainability and the adoption of biodegradable and recyclable materials are also reshaping the market, as stakeholders look for eco-friendly solutions to reduce environmental impact. Technological advancements in smart packaging, which integrates features like tamper-proof seals and chemical sensors, are further expanding the market landscape.

Key growth drivers include the rising adoption of precision agriculture techniques, which require advanced chemical formulations and specialized packaging. The growing population and food security concerns have escalated the use of agrochemicals, creating substantial demand for durable and high-performance packaging solutions. Increasing regulatory requirements for safe chemical handling and disposal have also contributed to market expansion, as manufacturers invest in compliance-friendly packaging designs. The market is increasingly benefiting from innovations in flexible packaging formats like pouches and bags, which provide lightweight and cost-effective alternatives to rigid containers.

Despite its growth potential, the market faces challenges such as fluctuating raw material prices and the complexities of integrating sustainability with cost-effectiveness. The safe disposal and recycling of chemical packaging remain significant hurdles, particularly in developing economies where waste management infrastructure is less developed. Market participants also face pressure to balance the need for durable and robust packaging with environmental regulations and consumer preferences for greener options. Nonetheless, opportunities abound in developing regions where agricultural activities are expanding, and sustainable practices are gaining traction. The development of reusable packaging systems and bio-based materials offers lucrative prospects for manufacturers aiming to address both functional and environmental needs in the coming years.

Key Market Drivers

Increasing Demand for Agrochemicals

The increasing demand for agrochemicals is a major driver for the growth of the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market. As the global population continues to rise, there is a corresponding need to boost food production to ensure food security. This has led to greater reliance on agrochemicals, such as fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides, to enhance crop yield, protect crops from pests and diseases, and improve overall agricultural productivity. In regions with rapidly expanding populations and limited arable land, such as Asia-Pacific and Africa, agrochemicals play a critical role in maximizing crop output per unit of land.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the global consumption of fertilizers has been increasing steadily, with nitrogen fertilizer consumption reaching approximately 118.5 million tonnes in 2021. This upward trend underscores the growing reliance on agrochemicals to meet the nutritional needs of the expanding global population. The FAO's data highlights the significant role that fertilizers play in enhancing crop productivity and ensuring food security worldwide.

To support the safe and efficient use of agrochemicals, packaging solutions must be durable, tamper-proof, and designed to prevent spillage and contamination. As the demand for agrochemicals grows, packaging must evolve to meet these increasing needs. Packaging must also comply with stringent regulatory standards, ensuring that it maintains the chemical integrity of the products while being safe for the environment and end-users. For instance, the development of child-resistant and tamper-evident packaging for hazardous chemicals is becoming more important in ensuring safety, especially in regions with high agrochemical use.

The market is also witnessing a shift toward sustainable packaging solutions, driven by growing environmental concerns and government regulations. Companies are increasingly adopting eco-friendly materials such as biodegradable plastics, paper, and recyclable materials in their packaging to minimize the ecological impact of agrochemicals. This growing demand for safe, efficient, and sustainable agrochemical packaging is a key driver for the expansion of the agricultural chemical packaging market.

Growth of Precision Agriculture

The growth of precision agriculture is a significant driver for the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market. Precision agriculture refers to the use of technology to optimize the amount, timing, and location of agrochemical applications, ensuring that resources are used efficiently and effectively. This farming technique leverages tools like GPS, drones, sensors, and data analytics to enhance crop yields while minimizing the environmental impact of agrochemicals. As precision agriculture continues to gain traction, there is an increasing demand for packaging solutions that support these technologies.

Packaging in precision agriculture must be designed for accuracy, efficiency, and minimal waste. With precise chemical application, farmers require packaging that allows for accurate dosing, easy measurement, and controlled dispensing. Innovations such as pre-measured doses, single-use pouches, and resealable containers are increasingly popular in this segment. These packaging solutions help farmers avoid overuse of chemicals, reduce the risk of spills, and ensure that the right amount of product is applied at the right time.

The rise in precision farming is also promoting the development of packaging materials that can preserve the integrity of the agrochemical contents. As products become more specialized and sensitive, packaging must maintain the stability and efficacy of these chemicals over time. Manufacturers are focusing on creating packaging that is not only functional but also compatible with advanced agricultural equipment. The need for smarter, more sustainable packaging options that align with the principles of precision agriculture is accelerating market growth in the agricultural chemical packaging sector.

According to a report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service, the adoption of automated guidance systems, a key component of precision agriculture, has increased sharply over the past 20 years. In 2023, 52% of midsize farms and 70% of large-scale crop-producing farms utilized guidance autosteering systems on their equipment, up from single-digit adoption rates in the early 2000s.

This widespread adoption of precision agriculture technologies underscores the growing need for specialized packaging solutions that support efficient and sustainable farming practices.

Technological Advancements in Packaging

Technological advancements in packaging are playing a pivotal role in the growth of the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market. As the agricultural sector demands more efficient, durable, and sustainable packaging solutions, innovations in materials, design, and technology have enabled manufacturers to meet these needs. One key development is the use of smart packaging, which integrates technologies such as RFID tags, QR codes, and sensors to track and monitor the condition of agrochemicals throughout the supply chain. This technology allows for real-time data on storage conditions, ensuring that the chemicals remain effective and safe for use, while also improving inventory management and reducing wastage.

In addition, advancements in materials science have led to the creation of stronger, lighter, and more eco-friendly packaging options. Packaging materials that offer enhanced barrier properties are being used to protect agricultural chemicals from moisture, UV rays, and contamination, thus extending the shelf life and ensuring the safety of the chemicals. The rise in biodegradable and recyclable packaging materials has also aligned with the growing demand for sustainable practices in agriculture, helping reduce environmental impact.

The development of multi-functional packaging that combines protective properties with ease of use, such as resealable bags and tamper-evident features, is further driving the market. These innovations not only improve the safety and convenience of handling agricultural chemicals but also ensure compliance with stringent regulatory requirements. Technological advancements in packaging are enabling the agricultural chemical packaging market to meet evolving consumer expectations and regulatory standards, driving the continued growth of the industry.

According to the American Chemistry Council, in 2023, there was a slight increase of 0.3% in the global agricultural chemical production compared to the previous year. Agricultural chemical production was forecast to grow by 4.4% worldwide in 2024.

Key Market Challenges

High Cost of Sustainable Packaging Solutions

The high cost of sustainable packaging solutions presents a significant challenge to the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market. Transitioning from traditional plastic packaging to eco-friendly alternatives such as biodegradable plastics, compostable materials, and recyclable options often requires substantial investment in research, development, and production. For instance, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Foreign Agricultural Service has launched the USD 10 million Sustainable Packaging Innovation Lab to support the development of sustainable packaging solutions for specialty crops, highlighting the financial commitment involved in such initiatives.

These sustainable materials and technologies are often more expensive than conventional options, leading to higher production costs. This cost increase can be particularly burdensome for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the agricultural sector, which may lack the financial resources to invest in new packaging technologies. Consequently, these SMEs might face challenges in adopting sustainable packaging solutions, potentially hindering their competitiveness in the market.

Moreover, the adoption of sustainable packaging may necessitate changes in manufacturing processes, supply chain logistics, and compliance with new regulations, all of which can incur additional costs. For example, the implementation of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme in the UK, aimed at improving recycling rates and reducing plastic pollution, has been delayed due to industry concerns about the financial impact. The scheme was initially set to begin in October 2024 but was postponed for a year after lobbying efforts by trade bodies representing food and drink companies.

These financial challenges can lead to higher prices for consumers, potentially reducing the affordability and accessibility of agricultural chemicals. In regions where cost sensitivity is high, this could result in decreased adoption of sustainable packaging solutions, thereby impeding the market's transition toward more environmentally friendly practices.

Recycling and Disposal Issues

Recycling and disposal issues present significant challenges in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market. Agricultural chemicals, including pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, are often packaged in materials that pose environmental risks if not properly disposed of or recycled. The packaging used for these chemicals is frequently made from multi-layered plastic, which is difficult to recycle due to the variety of materials used. Many of these packaging materials contain residues of chemicals, making them hazardous to handle and recycle. Improper disposal of these materials can lead to contamination of soil and water, posing serious environmental and health risks.

In addition, the packaging used for agricultural chemicals is often subject to strict regulations, which make recycling more complicated. For example, packaging must meet specific safety standards to ensure that it does not leak or degrade over time. This reduces the ability of manufacturers to use materials that are easier to recycle. Many packaging manufacturers are exploring biodegradable or recyclable alternatives, but these solutions are often more expensive and may not yet offer the same durability and protective qualities as traditional materials.

The lack of standardized recycling systems across regions further complicates the issue. In some areas, recycling infrastructure is not equipped to handle the specialized packaging used for agricultural chemicals, leading to increased waste and environmental impact. Addressing these recycling and disposal challenges requires collaboration between manufacturers, regulators, and recycling companies to develop safer, more efficient solutions that minimize environmental harm while maintaining the integrity of agricultural chemicals during storage and transportation.

Key Market Trends

Growth of Smart Packaging Technologies

The growth of smart packaging technologies is a prominent trend in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, driven by the need for enhanced product tracking, safety, and consumer engagement. Smart packaging technologies, such as RFID tags, QR codes, and sensors, enable real-time monitoring of agricultural chemicals from production to application. These innovations allow manufacturers to ensure product integrity by providing critical information on storage conditions, such as temperature and humidity levels, which are vital for maintaining the efficacy of agrochemicals. By integrating sensors into packaging, companies can prevent spoilage and deterioration of chemicals, ensuring that they remain safe for use until they reach the end user.

Smart packaging also supports supply chain transparency by allowing farmers, distributors, and consumers to access detailed product information, including authenticity, origin, and expiration dates. With increasing concerns over counterfeit agrochemical products and the potential risks they pose, the demand for such technologies is growing. Moreover, the integration of digital features like QR codes facilitates easy access to product instructions, safety guidelines, and regulatory compliance data, offering enhanced convenience and security.

Consumer preferences are also shifting toward packaging solutions that not only offer functional benefits but also promote sustainability. As a result, the development of eco-friendly smart packaging options is gaining momentum. Bio-based materials and recyclable components are being combined with smart technology to cater to the growing demand for sustainable agricultural chemical packaging. This trend is expected to play a significant role in shaping the future of the agricultural chemical packaging market, with continued advancements in smart technology expected to enhance packaging functionality and consumer experience.

Increasing Adoption of Flexible Packaging

The increasing adoption of flexible packaging is a significant trend in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, driven by its benefits in both functionality and environmental impact. Flexible packaging, such as pouches, bags, and films, offers a lightweight and space-efficient solution for agricultural chemicals like pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides. These packaging types are not only cost-effective but also provide better protection against moisture, air, and light, which helps preserve the chemical integrity of the products. As a result, they are preferred for packaging liquid, powder, and granular agrochemicals, ensuring long shelf life and product safety.

The growing demand for sustainable packaging solutions in agriculture is pushing manufacturers to adopt eco-friendly flexible packaging options. Many flexible packaging materials, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, are now being produced with a focus on recyclability and reduced environmental impact. Additionally, the ability to use less material while maintaining the strength and durability of the packaging has made flexible packaging a sustainable choice for agricultural chemical manufacturers. Consumer awareness and regulatory pressures to reduce plastic waste have also contributed to the shift toward recyclable or biodegradable flexible packaging options in the agricultural chemical sector.

As agriculture becomes increasingly globalized, packaging efficiency and convenience are crucial. Flexible packaging offers enhanced customization options, including various shapes and sizes, making it easier for manufacturers to meet the specific needs of different agricultural chemicals. This versatility in design and material choice continues to fuel the growth of flexible packaging, positioning it as a key trend in the agricultural chemical packaging market.

Segmental Insights

Product Type Insights

Based on the Product Type, Bags & Pouches emerged as the dominant segment in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market in 2024. This is due to their versatility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to provide superior protection for agricultural chemicals. These packaging solutions are ideal for both granular and powdered chemicals, such as fertilizers and pesticides, due to their lightweight nature, ease of transport, and storage efficiency. The ability to customize bags and pouches in various sizes and configurations makes them suitable for a wide range of agricultural chemical products, allowing manufacturers to meet the specific needs of their customers. The demand for bags and pouches is driven by the growing trend towards sustainable and eco-friendly packaging solutions. Many manufacturers are now opting for biodegradable or recyclable materials, ensuring that these packaging options align with increasing environmental regulations and consumer preferences for sustainability. Furthermore, the durability and strength of bags and pouches help protect the contents from moisture, air, and light, extending the shelf life of agricultural chemicals.

Material Type Insights

Based on the Material Type, Plastic emerged as the dominant segment in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market in 2024. This dominance is due to its durability, cost-effectiveness, and versatility in packaging agricultural chemicals. Plastic materials, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, offer excellent resistance to moisture, air, and chemicals, ensuring the preservation of the integrity and efficacy of pesticides, fertilizers, and other agrochemicals. This protective capability is essential for maintaining product quality during storage and transportation. Plastic's lightweight nature contributes to lower shipping costs and enhances the convenience of handling and storing chemical products. The material's ability to be easily molded into various shapes and sizes allows for customized packaging solutions tailored to specific agricultural chemicals, meeting the diverse needs of farmers and manufacturers alike. Furthermore, plastic can be manufactured in a range of thicknesses and layers, providing flexibility in packaging different types of chemicals, whether liquids, powders, or granules.

Another key factor driving the dominance of plastic is its cost-effectiveness. Plastic is relatively inexpensive compared to alternative materials, making it an attractive option for agricultural chemical manufacturers looking to minimize packaging costs while ensuring product safety. Despite growing environmental concerns, the continued innovation in recyclable and biodegradable plastic options is helping address sustainability issues, further cementing plastic's position as the leading material in the agricultural chemical packaging market.

Regional Insights

North America emerged as the dominant region in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market in 2024. This is due to several factors, including a strong agricultural industry, advanced packaging technology, and increasing demand for sustainable packaging solutions. The United States and Canada, as major agricultural producers, have a high demand for agricultural chemicals such as pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides. This demand drives the need for efficient, safe, and effective packaging to protect these chemicals during storage, transportation, and application. North America is also home to leading manufacturers of agricultural chemicals and packaging solutions, which has fostered innovation in packaging materials and designs. The region is a hub for the development and adoption of advanced packaging technologies, including the use of high-performance plastics, biodegradable materials, and recyclable options that align with the growing emphasis on environmental sustainability. Regulatory standards in North America, which require strict safety measures and proper labeling, have further contributed to the demand for high-quality packaging.

The increasing focus on sustainable agriculture and the need for eco-friendly packaging solutions in the region has also boosted the market. North American consumers and businesses are becoming more environmentally conscious, driving the adoption of sustainable packaging in the agricultural sector. These factors combined make North America the dominant region in the agricultural chemical packaging market in 2024.

Key Market Players

• SIG Group AG
• Codefine International SA
• Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
• Greif, Inc.
• Amcor plc
• NNZ Group BV
• LC Packaging International BV
• ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
• Nexus Packaging Ltd.
• Mauser Packaging Solutions

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Product Type:

• Bags & Pouches
• Bottles & Containers
• Drums & Intermediate Bulk Containers
• Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Material Type:

• Paper
• Plastic
• Metal
• Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Chemical:

• Pesticides
• Insecticides
• Herbicides
• Fertilizers
• Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, By Region:

• North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
• Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
• Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
• Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview

• 1.1. Market Definition
• 1.2. Scope of the Market
  • 1.2.1. Markets Covered
  • 1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
  • 1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Objective of the Study
• 2.2. Baseline Methodology
• 2.3. Key Industry Partners
• 2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
• 2.5. Forecasting Methodology
• 2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
• 2.7. Assumptions and Limitations

3. Executive Summary

• 3.1. Overview of the Market
• 3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
• 3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
• 3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
• 3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

4. Voice of Customer

5. Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 5.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 5.1.1. By Value
• 5.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 5.2.1. By Product Type (Bags & Pouches, Bottles & Containers, Drums & Intermediate Bulk Containers, Others)
  • 5.2.2. By Material Type (Paper, Plastic, Metal, Others)
  • 5.2.3. By Chemical (Pesticides, Insecticides, Herbicides, Fertilizers, Others)
  • 5.2.4. By Company (2024)
  • 5.2.5. By Region
• 5.3. Market Map

6. North America Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 6.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 6.1.1. By Value
• 6.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 6.2.1. By Product Type
  • 6.2.2. By Material Type
  • 6.2.3. By Chemical
  • 6.2.4. By Country
• 6.3. North America: Country Analysis
  • 6.3.1. United States Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 6.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 6.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 6.3.2. Mexico Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 6.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 6.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 6.3.3. Canada Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 6.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 6.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 6.3.3.2.3. By Chemical

7. Europe Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 7.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 7.1.1. By Value
• 7.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 7.2.1. By Product Type
  • 7.2.2. By Material Type
  • 7.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.2.4. By Country
• 7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
  • 7.3.1. France Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.2. Germany Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.3. United Kingdom Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.3.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.4. Italy Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.4.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.4.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.4.2.3. By Chemical
  • 7.3.5. Spain Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 7.3.5.2.1. By Product Type
      • 7.3.5.2.2. By Material Type
      • 7.3.5.2.3. By Chemical

8. Asia-Pacific Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 8.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 8.1.1. By Value
• 8.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 8.2.1. By Product Type
  • 8.2.2. By Material Type
  • 8.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.2.4. By Country
• 8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
  • 8.3.1. China Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.2. India Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.3. South Korea Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.3.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.4. Japan Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.4.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.4.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.4.2.3. By Chemical
  • 8.3.5. Australia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.1.1. By Value
    • 8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 8.3.5.2.1. By Product Type
      • 8.3.5.2.2. By Material Type
      • 8.3.5.2.3. By Chemical

9. South America Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 9.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 9.1.1. By Value
• 9.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 9.2.1. By Product Type
  • 9.2.2. By Material Type
  • 9.2.3. By Chemical
  • 9.2.4. By Country
• 9.3. South America: Country Analysis
  • 9.3.1. Brazil Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 9.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 9.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 9.3.2. Argentina Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 9.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 9.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 9.3.3. Colombia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 9.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 9.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 9.3.3.2.3. By Chemical

10. Middle East and Africa Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook

• 10.1. Market Size & Forecast
  • 10.1.1. By Value
• 10.2. Market Share & Forecast
  • 10.2.1. By Product Type
  • 10.2.2. By Material Type
  • 10.2.3. By Chemical
  • 10.2.4. By Country
• 10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
  • 10.3.1. South Africa Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.1.2.1. By Product Type
      • 10.3.1.2.2. By Material Type
      • 10.3.1.2.3. By Chemical
  • 10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.2.2.1. By Product Type
      • 10.3.2.2.2. By Material Type
      • 10.3.2.2.3. By Chemical
  • 10.3.3. UAE Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
    • 10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.1.1. By Value
    • 10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
      • 10.3.3.2.1. By Product Type
      • 10.3.3.2.2. By Material Type
      • 10.3.3.2.3. By Chemical

11. Market Dynamics

• 11.1. Drivers
• 11.2. Challenges

12. Market Trends & Developments

• 12.1. Merger & Acquisition (If Any)
• 12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
• 12.3. Recent Developments

13. Porters Five Forces Analysis

• 13.1. Competition in the Industry
• 13.2. Potential of New Entrants
• 13.3. Power of Suppliers
• 13.4. Power of Customers
• 13.5. Threat of Substitute Products

14. Competitive Landscape

• 14.1. SIG Group AG
  • 14.1.1. Business Overview
  • 14.1.2. Company Snapshot
  • 14.1.3. Products & Services
  • 14.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
  • 14.1.5. Recent Developments
  • 14.1.6. Key Personnel Details
  • 14.1.7. SWOT Analysis
• 14.2. Codefine International SA
• 14.3. Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
• 14.4. Greif, Inc.
• 14.5. Amcor plc
• 14.6. NNZ Group BV
• 14.7. LC Packaging International BV
• 14.8. ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
• 14.9. Nexus Packaging Ltd.
• 14.10. Mauser Packaging Solutions

15. Strategic Recommendations

16. About Us & Disclaimer