|
시장보고서
상품코드
2082898
식품 알레르기 : 시장 인사이트, 역학 및 시장 예측(2036년)Food Allergy - Market Insight, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast - 2036 |
||||||
DelveInsight
G7 국가들의 식품 알레르기 시장 규모 및 전망
본 식품 알레르기 시장 보고서에서는 표준 치료, 임상 실무, 진화하는 치료 알고리즘 등 현재 시장 상황에 대한 종합적인 분석을 제공합니다. 식품 알레르기 환자의 부담 동향, 수익 및 시장 점유율 동향, 피크 시기의 환자 점유율 및 치료 도입률 분석을 평가하는 한편, 전 세계 각 지역 시장 규모에 대한 상세한 평가와 성장률 예측(과거 데이터 및 2022년-2036년 예측)을 제시하고 있습니다. 본 보고서에서는 식품 알레르기 분야의 주요 미충족 의료 수요에 초점을 맞추어, 경쟁 환경 및 임상 현황을 분석함으로써 고부가가치 성장 기회를 도출하고, 향후 시장 성장 가능성에 대한 명확한 전망을 제시하고 있습니다.
식품 알레르기 유병률 증가
특히 남성의 식품 알레르기 유병률 증가는 시장 성장의 주요 촉진요인입니다. 2025년, 주요 7개국의 보고에 따르면, 진단된 유병 사례 수는 약 6,100만 건이었습니다.
표적형 식품 알레르기 치료 분야의 기회 확대
기존의 알레르겐 회피 전략에 비해, 새로운 면역요법의 안전성, 내약성, 질환 수정 효과의 가능성이 향상되고 있다는 새로운 증거가 점차 밝혀지고 있으며, 제약 개발 기업들이 면역 관용을 유도하고, 중증 반응의 위험을 줄이며, 식품 알레르기 환자에게 장기적인 보호를 제공하는 접근법에 주력할 기회가 증가하고 있음이 부각되고 있습니다.
식품 알레르기의 개요
식품 알레르기는 신체가 특정 식품 단백질을 유해한 것으로 잘못 인식하여 비정상적인 면역 반응을 일으킴으로써 발생하는 면역 매개성 질환입니다. 증상은 경증에서 중증에 이르기까지 다양하며, 가려움증, 두드러기, 부기, 복통, 구토, 설사 등이 나타납니다. 중증의 경우 아나필락시스가 발생할 수 있으며, 호흡곤란이나 혈압 저하를 동반하여 생명을 위협할 우려가 있습니다. 식품 알레르기는 주로 땅콩, 견과류, 우유, 달걀, 밀, 대두, 생선, 갑각류 등 일반적인 알레르기 유발 물질에 노출됨으로써 발생합니다. 일반적으로 유전적 요인과 환경적 요인이 복합적으로 작용하여 발병합니다.
식품 알레르기 진단
식품 알레르기 진단은 주로 임상 평가와 상세한 병력 청취를 통해 이루어집니다. 이때, 식품에 노출된 후 나타나는 두드러기, 위장 장애, 호흡 곤란 또는 아나필락시스 등 재현 가능한 증상에 중점을 둡니다. 피부 침습 검사나 혈청 특이적 면역글로불린 E(IgE) 측정 등의 검사는 감작 여부를 확인하는 데 도움이 되지만, 확정 진단의 황금기준은 여전히 경구 식품 부하 검사입니다.
식품 알레르기 치료
식품 알레르기 치료의 주요 목표는 알레르기 반응 예방, 아나필락시스 등 심각한 합병증의 위험 감소, 환자의 삶의 질 향상, 그리고 가능한 경우 장기적인 면역 관용 유도입니다. 관리는 주로 알레르기 유발 물질을 엄격히 피하고, 표시 내용을 꼼꼼히 확인하며, 교차 오염을 방지하는 것을 포함한 환자 교육을 중심으로 이루어집니다. 비상시 대비는 필수적이며, 아나필락시스의 1차 치료제로 에피네프린(예: 에피펜, AUVI-Q)이 사용되며, 증상 조절을 위해서는 항히스타민제(예: 세티리진, 디펜히드라민)나 코르티코스테로이드 등의 보조 요법이 병용됩니다.
장기적인 관리에 있어서는 단계적 면역요법이 점점 더 많이 채택되고 있습니다. PALFORZIA와 같은 경구 면역 요법(OIT)은 통제된 알레르겐 노출을 통해 탈감작을 유도하기 위해 사용됩니다. 새로운 치료법으로는 Viaskin Peanut Patch(DBV712)와 같은 경피 면역요법(EPIT), 안전성이 향상된 설하 면역요법(SLIT) 등이 있습니다. 중증 또는 다중 식품 알레르기가 있는 환자의 경우, IgE 매개 경로를 표적으로 하여 치료 성과를 향상시키기 위해 XOLAIR와 같은 생물학적 제제의 도입을 고려할 수 있습니다. 지속적인 보호를 확보하고 재발 위험을 줄이기 위해서는 식이요법 조정, 정기적인 모니터링, 동반된 알레르기성 질환의 관리와 같은 지지 요법이 여전히 매우 중요합니다.
식품 알레르기의 역학적 분석 및 예측에 관한 주요 조사 결과
식품 알레르기 시장은 엄격한 알레르기 유발 물질 회피 및 응급 상황 대응에서 보다 적극적인 질환 수정 요법으로의 전환이라는 큰 변화를 겪고 있습니다. 'PALFORZIA', 'Viaskin Peanut Patch(DBV712)', 그리고 'PVX108(AVX-201)'과 같은 새로운 면역요법의 등장은 일시적인 탈감작이 아닌, 장기적인 내성을 유도하는 것을 목표로 하는 표적 면역 조절로의 전환을 반영하고 있습니다. 이러한 진전은 안전성 향상, 중대한 부작용 위험 감소, 그리고 환자의 복약 순응도 향상에 초점을 맞춘 작용기전에 기반한 전략을 부각시키고 있으며, 이를 통해 임상적 신뢰성을 높이고 경쟁 구도를 재편하고 있습니다.
PVX108(AVX-201), Viaskin Peanut Patch(DBV712), ANAPHYLM(에피네프린 설하 필름) 등 혁신적인 개발 후보 약물의 지속적인 개발에 힘입어, 식품 알레르기 치료 현황은 정밀 의학에 기반한 치료법이 주목받고 있는 다른 면역 매개성 질환과 마찬가지로 진화를 거듭하고 있습니다. 또한, XOLAIR와 같이 주요 면역 경로를 표적으로 하는 생물학적 제제가 치료의 가능성을 더욱 넓혀가고 있습니다. 현재 미국은 유럽 및 기타 지역과 비교했을 때, 높은 인지도, 진단율 향상, 규제 당국의 강력한 지원, 그리고 새로운 치료법의 조기 도입에 힘입어 최대의 식품 알레르기 시장으로 자리매김하고 있습니다.
전반적으로, PALFORZIA와 같은 차별화된 치료법의 도입은 물론, Viaskin Peanut Patch, PVX108, ANAPHYLM과 같은 새로운 치료 옵션의 등장, 진단 기법의 개선, 그리고 환자와 보호자의 인식 제고가 예측 기간 동안 전 세계 식품 알레르기 시장의 꾸준한 성장을 견인할 것으로 예측됩니다. 이처럼 끊임없이 변화하는 상황은 승인된 제품과 개발 중인 후보 물질 모두에게 큰 상업적 기회를 제공하고 있으며, 특히 이 분야가 장기적인 질환 관리의 실현과 환자의 삶의 질 향상에 한 걸음씩 다가가고 있다는 점에서 그 가능성은 더욱 높아지고 있습니다.
응급 치료와 면역 요법이 함께 현재의 표준 치료를 구성하고 있는 한편, 생물학적 제제와 차세대 면역 조절 요법이 식품 알레르기 분야의 미래 혁신 전망을 형성하고 있습니다.
Food Allergy Market Size and Forecast in the 7MM
DelveInsight's 'Food Allergy- Market Insights, Epidemiology and Market Forecast - 2036' report delivers an in-depth understanding of the Food Allergy, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the Food Allergy market trends in the United States, EU4 (Germany, Spain, Italy, and France) and the United Kingdom, and Japan.
The Food Allergy market report delivers a comprehensive analysis of the current treatment landscape, including standards of care, clinical practices, and evolving therapeutic algorithms. It evaluates Food Allergy patient burden trends, revenue & market share dynamics, peak patient share & therapy uptake analysis, and provides an in-depth market size assessment, and growth rate projections (Historical & Forecast 2022-2036) across global regions. The report highlights key unmet medical needs in Food Allergy and maps the competitive and clinical landscape to uncover high-value opportunities, providing a clear outlook on future market growth potential.
Key Factors Driving the Food Allergy Market
Rising Food Allergy Prevalence
The Rising food allergy prevalence, particularly among males, is a key driver of market growth. In 2025, the 7MM reported approximately 61 million diagnosed prevalent cases.
Rising Opportunities in Targeted Food Allergy Therapies
Emerging evidence of improved safety, tolerability, and potential disease-modifying effects of novel immunotherapies over traditional allergen avoidance strategies highlights a growing opportunity for drug developers to focus on approaches that induce immune tolerance, reduce the risk of severe reactions, and provide long-term protection in food allergy patients.
Emerging Food Allergy Competitive Landscape
The evolving food allergy pipeline is a key market driver, with increasing focus on immunotherapies and novel desensitization approaches. Promising candidates such as DBV712, PVX108 (AVX-201), and ANAPHYLM are advancing through clinical trials, supporting future market growth.
Food Allergy Overview
Food allergy is an immune-mediated condition that occurs when the body mistakenly identifies certain food proteins as harmful, triggering an abnormal immune response. It can range from mild to severe, with symptoms such as itching, hives, swelling, abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea, and in severe cases, anaphylaxis, which may involve difficulty breathing, a drop in blood pressure, and can be life-threatening. Food allergy is primarily caused by exposure to common allergens such as peanuts, tree nuts, milk, eggs, wheat, soy, fish, and shellfish. It typically develops due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors.
Food Allergy Diagnosis
Food allergy is diagnosed primarily through clinical evaluation and detailed patient history, focusing on reproducible symptoms such as urticaria, gastrointestinal distress, respiratory difficulty, or anaphylaxis following food exposure. Diagnostic tests, including skin prick testing and serum-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) measurements, help confirm sensitization, while oral food challenge remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis.
Food Allergy Treatment
The primary goals of food allergy treatment are to prevent allergic reactions, reduce the risk of severe outcomes such as anaphylaxis, improve patient quality of life, and, where possible, induce long-term immune tolerance. Management is largely centered on strict allergen avoidance and patient education, including careful label reading and prevention of cross-contamination. Emergency preparedness is essential, with epinephrine (e.g., EpiPen, AUVI-Q) as the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, supported by adjunctive therapies such as antihistamines (e.g., cetirizine, diphenhydramine) and corticosteroids for symptom control.
For long-term management, immunotherapy approaches are increasingly adopted in a step-wise manner. Oral immunotherapy (OIT), such as PALFORZIA, is used to achieve desensitization through controlled allergen exposure. Emerging alternatives include epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) like Viaskin Peanut Patch (DBV712) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), which offer improved safety profiles. In patients with severe or multiple food allergies, biologic therapies such as XOLAIR may be considered to target IgE-mediated pathways and enhance treatment outcomes. Supportive strategies, including dietary modification, regular monitoring, and management of comorbid allergic conditions, remain critical to ensure sustained protection and reduce the risk of recurrence.
Food Allergy Unmet Needs
The section "unmet needs of Food Allergy" outlines the critical gaps between the current state of patient care, diagnosis, and the ideal & effective management of the disease. It highlights the obstacles experienced by patients, clinicians, and researchers and identifies potential solutions for future progress.
Comprehensive unmet needs insights in Food Allergy and their strategic implications are provided in the full report.
Key Findings from Food Allergy Epidemiological Analysis and Forecast
Food Allergy Drug Chapters & Competitive Analysis
The Food Allergy drug chapter provides a detailed, market-focused review of approved therapies and the emerging pipeline across Phase I-III clinical trials. It covers the mechanism of action, clinical trial data, regulatory approvals, patents, collaborations, and strategic partnerships for each therapy, along with their advantages, limitations, and recent developments. This section offers critical insights into the Food Allergy treatment landscape, supporting market assessment, competitive analysis, and growth forecasting for the Food Allergy therapeutics market.
Approved Therapies for Food Allergy
Omalizumab (XOLAIR): Novartis/ Roche
XOLAIR, developed by Novartis and Roche, is a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody that targets the underlying allergic pathway by binding to free IgE and preventing its interaction with receptors on mast cells and basophils. Initially approved for allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria, XOLAIR received US FDA approval in 2024 for the treatment of food allergy to reduce the risk of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, following accidental exposure to one or more foods. By lowering circulating IgE levels, it helps decrease hypersensitivity responses and provides a novel, mechanism-driven approach for food allergy management, reflecting its expanded clinical utility and significance in addressing an area of high unmet need.
Epinephrine /Adrenaline (NEFFY/ EURNEFFY): ARS Pharmaceuticals /ALK Abello /Alfresa Pharma
NEFFY/EURNEFFY, developed by ARS Pharmaceuticals and partnered with ALK-Abello and Alfresa Pharma for global commercialization, is a needle-free, intranasal formulation of epinephrine designed for the emergency treatment of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis associated with food allergy. As a fast-acting sympathomimetic agent, epinephrine works by constricting blood vessels, relaxing airway muscles, and reducing swelling, thereby rapidly reversing life-threatening symptoms. NEFFY has gained regulatory approvals in key markets, including the US and Europe, offering a convenient and user-friendly alternative to traditional injectable auto-injectors, potentially improving adherence and timely administration during acute allergic emergencies.
Food Allergy Pipeline Analysis
Viaskin (DBV712) Peanut Patch: DBV Technologies
DBV712, developed by DBV Technologies, is an innovative epicutaneous immunotherapy designed for the treatment of peanut allergy. It delivers small, controlled amounts of peanut protein through the skin using a non-invasive patch, promoting immune tolerance while minimizing systemic exposure. This approach targets Langerhans cells in the epidermis to modulate the immune response without entering the bloodstream in significant quantities. DBV712 aims to reduce the risk of severe allergic reactions upon accidental exposure, offering a safer and more convenient alternative to oral immunotherapy, particularly for pediatric patients.
PVX108 (AVX-201): Aravax
PVX108, developed by Aravax, is an investigational peptide-based immunotherapy for peanut allergy designed to induce immune tolerance by targeting specific T-cell epitopes of peanut allergens. Unlike traditional allergen exposure approaches, it uses short synthetic peptides that do not cross-link IgE, thereby reducing the risk of allergic reactions during treatment. This targeted mechanism aims to modulate the immune response, promoting long-term desensitization while improving safety and tolerability. By addressing the underlying immune dysfunction, PVX108 has the potential to offer a disease-modifying approach for food allergy management.
Food Allergy Key Players, Market Leaders and Emerging Companies
Food Allergy Drug Updates
The food allergy market is undergoing a significant transformation, shifting from strict allergen avoidance and emergency management toward more proactive, disease-modifying therapeutic approaches. The emergence of novel immunotherapies such as PALFORZIA, Viaskin Peanut Patch (DBV712), and PVX108 (AVX-201) reflects a move toward targeted immune modulation aimed at inducing long-term tolerance rather than temporary desensitization. These advancements highlight mechanism-driven strategies focused on improving safety, reducing the risk of severe reactions, and enhancing patient adherence, thereby strengthening clinical confidence and reshaping the competitive landscape.
With the continued development of innovative pipeline candidates, including PVX108 (AVX-201), Viaskin Peanut Patch (DBV712), and ANAPHYLM (epinephrine sublingual film), the food allergy treatment landscape is evolving in line with other immune-mediated conditions where precision-based therapies are gaining traction. Additionally, biologics targeting key immune pathways, such as XOLAIR, are further expanding therapeutic possibilities. The United States currently represents the largest food allergy market, supported by higher awareness, improved diagnosis rates, strong regulatory support, and early adoption of novel therapies compared with Europe and other regions.
Overall, the introduction of differentiated therapies such as PALFORZIA, alongside emerging options like Viaskin Peanut Patch, PVX108, and ANAPHYLM, improving diagnostic practices, and rising awareness among patients and caregivers are expected to drive steady growth in the global food allergy market over the forecast period. This evolving landscape presents substantial commercial opportunities for both approved products and pipeline candidates, particularly as the field moves closer to achieving long-term disease control and improved quality of life for patients.
Drug Class/Insights into Leading Emerging and Marketed Therapies in Food Allergy (2022-2036 Forecast)
The food allergy market comprises emergency pharmacologic treatments, allergen-specific immunotherapies, biologics, and supportive/non-drug approaches, each addressing distinct aspects of acute reaction management, desensitization, and long-term immune modulation.
Emergency treatments and immunotherapies together form the current standard of care, while biologics and next-generation immunomodulatory therapies are shaping the future innovation landscape in food allergy.
Food Allergy Drug Uptake
This section focuses on the uptake rate of potential drugs expected to be launched in the market during the forecast period (2026-2036). The analysis covers the Food Allergy market's uptake by drugs, patient uptake by therapy, and sales of each drug.
The uptake of therapies in food allergy is expected to vary across allergen avoidance strategies, emergency treatments, immunotherapies, and emerging disease-modifying agents. Currently available options, such as epinephrine for acute reactions and oral immunotherapy (e.g., peanut allergen products), demonstrate moderate uptake, while newer approaches, including epicutaneous patches and peptide-based immunotherapies, are anticipated to show progressive adoption, supported by improved safety profiles and better patient compliance. Their uptake is likely to be driven by the limitations of strict dietary avoidance and the persistent risk of accidental exposure, along with the burden of anxiety and reduced quality of life. In comparison, next-generation therapies targeting immune tolerance and novel delivery approaches are expected to witness gradual but steady uptake as clinical evidence strengthens and these therapies become increasingly integrated into treatment guidelines for diverse food allergy populations.
Food Allergy Therapies Price Scenario & Trends
Pricing and analogue assessment of Food Allergy therapies highlights evolving price dynamics structures. This section summarizes the cost of approved treatments, the closest and most appropriate analogue selection for emerging therapies, and the understanding of how pricing influences market access, adherence, and long-term uptake.
At a list price of approximately USD 890 per month in the US, PALFORZIA results in an estimated annual therapy cost of around USD 10,680.
Further details are provided in the final report....
Industry Experts and Physician Views on Food Allergy
To keep up with Food Allergy market trends, we take Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) opinions working in the domain through primary research to fill the data gaps and validate our secondary research. Industry experts were contacted for insights on the Food Allergy emerging therapies, evolving treatment landscape, patient adherence to conventional therapies, therapy switching trends, drug adoption and uptake, accessibility challenges, and epidemiology and real-world prescription patterns in Food Allergy, including MD, PhD, Instructor, Postdoctoral Researcher, Professor, Researcher, and others.
DelveInsight's analysts connected with 10+ KOLs to gather insights; however, interviews were conducted with 6+ KOLs in the 7MM. Centers such as the Harvard Medical School, University of Nottingham, and Japanese Red Cross Central Blood Institute, etc. were contacted. Their opinion helps understand and validate current and emerging Food Allergy therapies, highlight unmet medical needs, provide epidemiological context, and support strategic decisions for market access, therapy adoption, and pipeline prioritization in Food Allergy.
Qualitative Analysis: SWOT and Conjoint Analysis
We perform qualitative and market Intelligence analysis using various approaches, such as SWOT analysis and conjoint analysis.
In the SWOT analysis of Food Allergy, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in terms of disease diagnosis, patient awareness, patient burden, competitive landscape, cost-effectiveness, and geographical accessibility of therapies are provided.
Conjoint analysis analyzes emerging therapies based on relevant attributes such as safety, efficacy, frequency of administration, route of administration, and order of entry. Scoring is given based on these parameters to analyze the effectiveness of therapy.
The team of analysts analyzes promising emerging therapies based on relevant attributes such as safety, efficacy, frequency of administration, route of administration, and order of entry. In efficacy, the trial's primary and secondary outcome measures are evaluated, whereas the therapies' safety is evaluated, wherein the acceptability, tolerability, and adverse events are mainly observed. In addition, the scoring is also based on the route of administration, order of entry, probability of success, and the addressable patient pool for each therapy. According to these parameters, the final weightage score and the ranking of the emerging therapies are decided.
Market Insights