½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óÇ°ÄÚµå
1555815

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ »óó ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå : ±Ô¸ð, Á¡À¯À², µ¿Ç⠺м®(2024-2030³â) : MedSuite

Wound and Tissue Management Market Size, Share, and Trends Analysis | United States | 2024-2030 | MedSuite | Includes: Wound Closure Market, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, and 11 more

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: iData Research Inc. | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 505 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 1-2ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    



¡Ø º» »óÇ°Àº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

2023³â ¹Ì±¹ »óó ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 122¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀº 3.9%ÀÇ ¿¬Æò±Õ º¹ÇÕ ¼ºÀå·ü(CAGR)·Î È®´ëµÇ°í ¿¹Ãø ±â°£ Á¾·á ½Ã¿¡´Â 159¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

»óó ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸® ºÐ¾ßÀÇ ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ ¼ºÀåÀ» ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ÇÑÆí, ´ëü â»ó ÄÉ¾î ¿É¼ÇÀÇ µîÀå¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½ÃÀåÀº °úÁ¦¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±âÁ¸ÀÇ »óó ÇǺ¹Àç´Â ¼±ÁøÀûÀÎ Á¦Ç° À¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ´ëüµÇ°í ÀÖÁö¸¸, ¼±ÁøÀûÀÎ Á¦Ç° À¯ÇüÀ̶óµµ, ƯÁ¤ÀÇ »óó À¯Çü¿¡ ¸ÂÃá »õ·Î¿î ¼ö¹ýÀÌ ¶Ù¾î³­ °Íµµ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì±¹ÀÇ »óó ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀ» µ¶Á¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀº ´ë±â¾÷ 3»ç, Ethicon, 3M, MedtronicÀÔ´Ï´Ù. EthiconÀº »óó Æó¼â ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ ÁÖµµÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÏ¸ç ½ÃÀå ÀüüÀÇ 25% ÀÌ»óÀ» Â÷ÁöÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °Ô´Ù°¡ EthiconÀº ¼ö¼ú¿ë ÁöÇ÷Àç, À¯Âø¹æÁöÁ¦, Á¶Á÷ ½Ç¶õÆ®¿¡¼­µµ °­ÇÑ Á¸Àç°¨À» º¸ÀÌ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼­ ²ÙÁØÇÑ ¼ºÀåÀÌ ±â´ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

2À§ÀÎ 3MÀº NPWT¿¡¼­ 75% ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¾ÐµµÀûÀÎ ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À²À» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °íµµÀÇ »óó ÇǺ¹Àç¿¡¼­µµ Å« Á¡À¯À²À» Â÷ÁöÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. µÎ ºÐ¾ß ¸ðµÎ CAGR 4-5%ÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀÌ ¿¹»óµÇ°í 3MÀÇ ¹ßÆÇÀº °ß°íÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î µÇ¾î ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

MedtronicÀº ºÀÇÕ»ç, ½ºÅ×ÀÌÇ÷¯, °áÂû Ŭ¸³ µîÀÇ »óó Æó¼â Á¦Ç°À¸·Î Å« Á¡À¯À²À» ¾ò°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ ½ÃÀå ºÎ¹®ÀÇ 1/4 ÀÌ»óÀ» Â÷ÁöÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±âŸ È°µ¿Àº Á¦ÇÑÀûÀÌ¸ç »óó Æó¼â¿¡¼­ ¸ÞµåÆ®·Î´ÐÀÇ ÁöÀ§´Â ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÈûÀ» º¸ÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÌ º¸°í¼­´Â ¹Ì±¹ »óó ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå¿¡ ´ëÇØ Á¶»çÇßÀ¸¸ç, ½ÃÀå °³¿ä¿Í ÇÔ²² ºÎ¹®º° µ¿Çâ, COVID-19ÀÇ ¿µÇ⠺м®, ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ ¹× ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ, °æÀï ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼® ¹× ½ÃÀå ÁøÃâ ±â¾÷ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ µîÀÇ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°øÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

¸ñÂ÷

ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

¹Ì±¹ »óó ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå¿¡ ´ëÇÑ COVID-19ÀÇ ¿µÇâ

  • ¼Ò°³
  • Áö¿ª ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ
  • ½ÃÀå ºÎ¹®º° ºÐ¼®

Áúº´ °³¿ä

  • ±âº»ÀûÀÎ ÇغÎÇÐ
  • Áúº´ÀÇ Ä¡·á¿Í Áø´Ü
  • ȯÀÚ Àα¸Åë°è

Á¦Ç° Æò°¡

  • ¼Ò°³
  • Á¦Ç° Æ÷Æ®Æú¸®¿À
  • ±ÔÁ¦»óÀÇ ¹®Á¦¿Í ¸®ÄÝ
  • ÀÓ»ó½ÃÇè

¹Ì±¹ »óó ¹× Á¶Á÷ °ü¸® ½ÃÀå °³¿ä

  • ¼Ò°³
  • ½ÃÀå °³¿ä¿Í Æ®·»µå ºÐ¼®
  • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀΰú ¸®¹ÌÅÍ
  • °æÀï ½ÃÀå Á¡À¯À² ºÐ¼®
  • ÇÕº´°ú Àμö
  • ±â¾÷ ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ
    • 3M
    • Baxter
    • Cardinal Health
    • Essity
    • Ethicon
    • Integra Lifesciences
    • Intuitive Surgical
    • Medline
    • Medtronic
    • MiMedx
    • Organogenesis
    • Smith & Nephew
    • Tactile Medical
  • SWOT ºÐ¼®

»óó ºÀÇÕ ½ÃÀå

ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ »óó µå·¹½Ì ½ÃÀå

÷´Ü »óó ÇǺ¹ ½ÃÀå

¸ðÀ̽ºÆ® µå·¹½Ì ½ÃÀå

Ç×±Õ µå·¹½Ì ½ÃÀå

ÀÎÅÍ·¢Æ¼ºê µå·¹½Ì ½ÃÀå

ºñÁ¢Âø¼º Á¢ÃËÃþ ½ÃÀå

¼ö¼ú¿ë ÁöÇ÷Àç ½ÃÀå

Á¶Á÷ ½Ç¶õÆ® ½ÃÀå

À½¾Ð»óóġ·á ½ÃÀå

Á¤Àû ¾Ð¹Ú ¿ä¹ý ½ÃÀå

µ¿Àû ¾ÐÃà ¿ä¹ý ½ÃÀå

JHS 24.09.24

In 2023, the U.S. wound and tissue management market was valued at $12.2 billion, with expectations for it to grow at a 3.9% CAGR, reaching $15.9 billion by the end of the forecast period. The full report on this market encompasses a wide range of segments, including wound closure, traditional and advanced wound dressings (such as moist, antimicrobial, interactive, and non-adherent contact layers), surgical hemostats, tissue sealants, anti-adhesion products, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), static compression therapy, and dynamic compression therapy.

DATA COVERED IN THE REPORT:

  • Unit Sales, Pricing Trends, and Market Growth
  • Projections to 2030 and Historical Insights from 2020
  • Key Drivers and Restraints by Segment
  • Competitive Landscape with Market Share Breakdown
  • Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Procedure Volumes
  • Competitor Profiles, Product Portfolios, and SWOT Analysis for Leading Companies
  • Impact of COVID-19

U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET TRENDS:

While most wound and tissue management segments are experiencing growth, the market faces challenges due to the availability of alternative wound care options. Traditional wound dressings are increasingly being replaced by advanced products, although even within the advanced segment, some dressings are outperformed by newer methods tailored to specific wound types

.U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET LEADERS:

Three major companies dominate the U.S. wound and tissue management market: Ethicon, 3M, and Medtronic.

  • Ethicon holds the top position, primarily due to its leading role in wound closure, representing over 25% of the total market. Additionally, Ethicon has a strong presence in surgical hemostats, anti-adhesion, and tissue sealants, with steady growth expected in these sectors.
  • 3M ranks second, driven by its dominant 75%+ market share in NPWT and significant stake in advanced wound dressings. Both segments are anticipated to grow at a 4-5% CAGR, reinforcing 3M's strong foothold.
  • Medtronic secures third place, thanks to its significant share in wound closure products like sutures, staplers, and ligating clips, which account for over a quarter of that market segment. Despite limited activity in other areas, Medtronic's position in wound closure ensures its market strength.

MARKET SEGMENTATION OVERVIEW:

  • Wound Closure Market: Includes sutures, staplers, ligating clips, skin closure strips, mesh, and cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesives.
  • Traditional Wound Dressings: Comprises gauze, tapes, bandages (excluding compression types), and cotton-based products.
  • Advanced Wound Dressings: Covers moist, antimicrobial, interactive dressings, and non-adherent contact layers.
  • Moist Dressings: Encompasses foam, transparent films, hydrocolloid, alginate, gelling fiber, and hydrogel dressings.
  • Antimicrobial Dressings: Includes both silver-based and non-silver antimicrobial options.
  • Interactive Dressings: Biomaterials such as collagen-based products and skin substitutes.
  • Non-Adherent Contact Layers: Used in hospital and alternate care settings.
  • Surgical Hemostats: Includes thrombin-based, oxidized cellulose, gelatin, collagen, polysaccharide, and combination hemostats.
  • Tissue Sealants: Includes fibrin, protein, and synthetic-based tissue sealants.
  • Anti-Adhesion: Used for gynecological, abdominal, and other surgeries to prevent adhesion.
  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT): Includes single-use pumps, conventional NPWT rentals, dressings, and canisters.
  • Static Compression Therapy: Consists of compression stockings, AES, compression bandages, and Unna boots.
  • Dynamic Compression Therapy: Comprises dynamic DVT prevention sleeves, mobile DVT prevention, and pneumatic compression devices.

RESEARCH SCOPE SUMMARY:

  • Regions: United States
  • Base Year: 2023
  • Forecast Period: 2024-2030
  • Historical Data: 2020-2022
  • Quantitative Coverage: Market Size, Shares, Forecasts, Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Prices
  • Qualitative Coverage: COVID-19 Impact, Market Trends, Limiters, Competitive
  • Landscape, SWOT, Mergers & Acquisitions, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies,
  • Disease Insights
  • Data Sources: Interviews with industry experts, government and regulatory data, hospital statistics, import/export records, and internal iData Research databases.

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE of CONTENTS

List of Figures

List of Charts

executive summary

U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview

Competitive Analysis

Market Trends

Market Developments

Markets Included

Key Report Updates

Version History

research methodology

  • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
  • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
  • Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
  • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
  • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
  • Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
  • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
  • Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
  • Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Wound and tissue management Market

  • 2.1 Introduction
  • 2.2 Analysis By Market Segment
    • 2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario
    • 2.2.2 Base Case Scenario
    • 2.2.3 Best Case Scenario

Disease Overview

  • 3.1 Disease Treatment and Diagnostic
    • 3.1.1 Vascular Malformations
    • 3.1.2 Deep Ven Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
    • 3.1.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
    • 3.1.4 Lymphedema
    • 3.1.5 Surgery
    • 3.1.6 Traumas and Burns
  • 3.2 Patient Demographics
    • 3.2.1 Vascular Malformations
    • 3.2.2 Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
    • 3.2.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
    • 3.2.4 Lymphedema
    • 3.2.5 Traumas and Burns

Product Assessment

  • 4.1 Introduction
  • 4.2 Product Portfolios
    • 4.2.1 Wound Closure Devices
      • 4.2.1.1 Sutures
      • 4.2.1.2 Staplers
      • 4.2.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
      • 4.2.1.4 Wound Closure Strips
      • 4.2.1.5 Tissue Adhesives
    • 4.2.2 Traditional Wound Dressings
    • 4.2.3 Advanced Wound Dressings
    • 4.2.4 Moist Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.1 Foam Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.4 Alginate Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
      • 4.2.4.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
    • 4.2.5 Antimicrobial Dressings
      • 4.2.5.1.1 Silver Dressing
      • 4.2.5.1.2 Non-Silver Dressing
      • 4.2.5.1.3 Charcoal Dressing
    • 4.2.6 Interactive Dressing
      • 4.2.6.1.1 Bioactive Dressings
      • 4.2.6.1.2 Skin Substitute
    • 4.2.7 Non-Adherent Contact Layer
    • 4.2.8 Surgical Hemostats
      • 4.2.8.1 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
      • 4.2.8.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostats
      • 4.2.8.3 Gelatin-Based Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.4 Collagen-Based Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.5 Combination Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.6 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat
      • 4.2.8.7 First-Responder Hemostat
    • 4.2.9 Tissue Sealants
      • 4.2.9.1 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealants
      • 4.2.9.2 Protein-Based Tissue Sealants
      • 4.2.9.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
    • 4.2.10 Anti-Adhesion
    • 4.2.11 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
    • 4.2.12 Static Compression Therapy
      • 4.2.12.1 Compression Stockings
      • 4.2.12.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
      • 4.2.12.3 Compression Bandages
      • 4.2.12.4 Unna Boots
    • 4.2.13 Dynamic Compression Therapy
      • 4.2.13.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention
      • 4.2.13.2 Mobile DVT Prevention
      • 4.2.13.3 Pneumatic Compression
  • 4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls
    • 4.3.1 Wound Closure Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.2 Moist Dressing Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.4 Interactive Dressing Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.5 Surgical Hemostat Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.6 Tissue Sealant Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.7 Anti-Adhesion Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.8 Negative Pressure Market FDA Recalls
    • 4.3.9 Static Compression Therapy Market FDA Recalls
  • 4.4 Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.1 Wound Closure Devices Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.2 Advanced Wound Dressings Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.3 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.4 Surgical Hemostat Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.5 Tissue Sealant Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.6 Static Compression Clinical Trials
    • 4.4.7 Dynamic Compression Clinical Trials

U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
  • 5.3 Drivers and Limiters
    • 5.3.1 Market Drivers
    • 5.3.2 Market Limiters
  • 5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
  • 5.6 Company Profiles
    • 5.6.1 3M
    • 5.6.2 Baxter
    • 5.6.3 Cardinal Health
    • 5.6.4 Essity
    • 5.6.5 Ethicon
    • 5.6.6 Integra Lifesciences
    • 5.6.7 Intuitive Surgical
    • 5.6.8 Medline
    • 5.6.9 Medtronic
    • 5.6.10 MiMedx
    • 5.6.11 Organogenesis
    • 5.6.12 Smith & Nephew
    • 5.6.13 Tactile Medical
  • 5.7 SWOT Analysis
    • 5.7.1 3M
    • 5.7.2 Baxter
    • 5.7.3 Cardinal Health
    • 5.7.4 Essity
    • 5.7.5 Ethicon
    • 5.7.6 Integra Lifesciences
    • 5.7.7 Intuitive Surgical
    • 5.7.8 Medline
    • 5.7.9 Medtronic
    • 5.7.10 MiMedx
    • 5.7.11 Organogenesis
    • 5.7.12 Smith & Nephew
    • 5.7.13 Tactile Medical

Wound Closure Market

  • 6.1 Introduction
    • 6.1.1 Sutures
    • 6.1.2 Staplers
    • 6.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
    • 6.1.4 Skin Closure Strips
    • 6.1.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System
    • 6.1.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure
    • 6.1.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesives
  • 6.2 Market Overview
  • 6.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 6.3.1 Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.1 Suture Market by Device Type
      • 6.3.1.1.1 Absorbable Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.1.2 Non-Absorbable Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.1.3 Knotless Tissue Closure Market
      • 6.3.1.2 Suture Market by Infection Control Type
      • 6.3.1.2.1 Antibacterial Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.2.2 Standard Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.3 Suture Market by Care Setting
      • 6.3.1.3.1 Hospital Suture Market
      • 6.3.1.3.2 Alternate Care Suture Market
    • 6.3.2 Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.1 Stapler Market by Device Type
      • 6.3.2.1.1 Open Surgery Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.1.2 Laparoscopic Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.1.3 Skin Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.2 Stapler Market by Care Setting
      • 6.3.2.2.1 Hospital Stapler Market
      • 6.3.2.2.2 Alternate Care Stapler Market
    • 6.3.3 Ligation Clip Applier Market
      • 6.3.3.1 Ligating Clip Applier Market by Device Type
      • 6.3.3.1.1 Open Surgery Ligation Market
      • 6.3.3.1.2 Laparoscopic Ligation Market
      • 6.3.3.2 Ligation Market by Care Setting
      • 6.3.3.2.1 Hospital Ligation Market
      • 6.3.3.2.2 Alternate Care Ligation Market
    • 6.3.4 Skin Closure Strip Market
      • 6.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Closure Strip Market
      • 6.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Closure Strip Market
    • 6.3.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System Market
    • 6.3.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure Market
    • 6.3.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
      • 6.3.7.1 Hospital Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
      • 6.3.7.2 Alternate Care Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
  • 6.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 6.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 6.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 6.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Traditional Wound Dressing Market

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Market Overview
  • 7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 7.3.1 Traditional Wound Dressing Market
    • 7.3.2 Gauze Market
      • 7.3.2.1 Hospital Gauze Market
      • 7.3.2.2 Alternate Care Gauze Market
    • 7.3.3 Tape Market
      • 7.3.3.1 Hospital Tape Market
      • 7.3.3.2 Alternate Care Tape Market
    • 7.3.4 Bandage Market
      • 7.3.4.1 Hospital Bandage Market
      • 7.3.4.2 Alternate Care Bandage Market
    • 7.3.5 Cotton Market
      • 7.3.5.1 Hospital Cotton Market
      • 7.3.5.2 Alternate Care Cotton Market
  • 7.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 7.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 7.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Advanced wound dressing Market

  • 8.1 Introduction
    • 8.1.1 Moist Advanced Dressings
    • 8.1.2 Antimicrobial Advanced Dressings
    • 8.1.3 Interactive Advanced Dressings
    • 8.1.4 Non-Adherent Contact Layers
  • 8.2 Market Overview
  • 8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 8.3.1 Advanced Wound Dressing Market
    • 8.3.2 Moist Dressing Market
    • 8.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
    • 8.3.4 Interactive Advanced Dressing Market
    • 8.3.5 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
  • 8.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 8.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 8.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Moist dressing Market

  • 9.1 Introduction
    • 9.1.1 Foam Dressings
    • 9.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
    • 9.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
    • 9.1.4 Alginate Dressings
    • 9.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
    • 9.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
  • 9.2 Market Overview
    • 9.2.1 Moist Dressing Market by Segment
  • 9.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 9.3.1 Moist Dressing Market
    • 9.3.2 Foam Dressing Market
    • 9.3.3 Transparent Film Dressing Market
    • 9.3.4 Hydrocolloid Dressing Market
    • 9.3.5 Alginate Dressing Market
    • 9.3.6 Gelling Fiber Dressing Market
    • 9.3.7 Hydrogel Dressing Market
    • 9.3.8 Moist Dressing Market by Care Setting
      • 9.3.8.1 Hospital Moist Dressing Market
      • 9.3.8.2 Alternate Care Moist Dressing Market
  • 9.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 9.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 9.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 9.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Antimicrobial dressing Market

  • 10.1 Introduction
    • 10.1.1 Silver Dressings
    • 10.1.2 Non-Silver Dressings
  • 10.2 Market Overview
    • 10.2.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Segment
  • 10.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 10.3.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
    • 10.3.2 Silver Dressing Market
    • 10.3.3 Non-Silver Dressing Market
    • 10.3.4 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Care Setting
      • 10.3.4.1 Hospital Antimicrobial Dressing Market
      • 10.3.4.2 Alternate Care Antimicrobial Dressing Market
  • 10.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 10.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 10.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 10.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Interactive dressing Market

  • 11.1 Introduction
    • 11.1.1 Biomaterials
    • 11.1.2 Skin Substitutes
  • 11.2 Market Overview
  • 11.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 11.3.1 Interactive Dressing Market
    • 11.3.2 Collagen Dressing Market
    • 11.3.3 Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.1 Particulate Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.2 Sheet Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.3 Other Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.4 Skin Substitute Market by Care Setting
      • 11.3.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Substitute Market
      • 11.3.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Substitute Market
  • 11.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 11.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 11.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Non-Adherent Contact layer Market

  • 12.1 Introduction
  • 12.2 Market Overview
  • 12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 12.3.1 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
    • 12.3.2 Hospital Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
    • 12.3.3 Alternate Care Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
  • 12.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 12.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 12.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Surgical Hemostat Market

  • 13.1 Introduction
    • 13.1.1 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.3 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.5 Collagen-Based Hemostats
    • 13.1.6 Combination Hemostats
    • 13.1.7 First Responder Hemostats
  • 13.2 Market Overview
  • 13.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 13.3.1 Surgical Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.2 Thrombin-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.3 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.5 Collagen-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.6 Combination Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.7 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat Market
    • 13.3.8 First Responder Hemostat Market
  • 13.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 13.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 13.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 13.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Tissue sealant Market

  • 14.1 Introduction
    • 14.1.1 Fibrin Sealants
    • 14.1.2 Protein-Based Sealants
    • 14.1.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
  • 14.2 Market Overview
  • 14.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 14.3.1 Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.2 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.3 Protein-Based Tissue Sealant Market
    • 14.3.4 Synthetic Tissue Sealant Market
  • 14.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 14.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 14.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 14.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Anti-Adhesion Market

  • 15.1 Introduction
  • 15.2 Market Overview
  • 15.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 15.3.1 Anti-Adhesion Market
    • 15.3.2 Gynecological Procedure Market
    • 15.3.3 Abdominal Procedure Market
    • 15.3.4 Other Procedures Market
  • 15.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 15.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 15.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 15.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market

  • 16.1 Introduction
  • 16.2 Market Overview
  • 16.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 16.3.1 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market
    • 16.3.2 Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
      • 16.3.2.1 Hospital Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
      • 16.3.2.2 Alternate Care Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
    • 16.3.3 Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
      • 16.3.3.1 Hospital Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
      • 16.3.3.2 Alternate Care Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
    • 16.3.4 NPWT Dressing Market
      • 16.3.4.1 Hospital NPWT Dressing Market
      • 16.3.4.2 Alternate Care NPWT Dressing Market
    • 16.3.5 NPWT Canister Market
      • 16.3.5.1 Hospital NPWT Canister Market
      • 16.3.5.2 Alternate Care NPWT Canister Market
  • 16.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 16.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 16.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 16.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Static Compression therapy Market

  • 17.1 Introduction
    • 17.1.1 Graduated Compression Stockings
    • 17.1.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
    • 17.1.3 Compression Bandages
    • 17.1.4 Unna Boot
  • 17.2 Market Overview
  • 17.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 17.3.1 Static Compression Therapy Market
    • 17.3.2 Graduated Compression Stocking Market
      • 17.3.2.1 OTC Graduated Compression Stocking Market
      • 17.3.2.2 Medical-Grade Graduated Compression Stocking Market
    • 17.3.3 Anti-Embolism Stocking Market
    • 17.3.4 Compression Bandage Market
      • 17.3.4.1 Compression Kit Market
      • 17.3.4.2 Adhesive Bandage Market
      • 17.3.4.3 Cohesive Bandage Market
    • 17.3.5 Unna Boot Market
  • 17.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 17.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 17.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 17.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Dynamic Compression Therapy Market

  • 18.1 Introduction
    • 18.1.1 Dynamic Deep Vein Thrombosis Prevention
    • 18.1.2 Mobile Deep Vein Thrombosis Compression
    • 18.1.3 Pneumatic Compression
  • 18.2 Market Overview
  • 18.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
    • 18.3.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention Device Market
    • 18.3.2 Mobile DVT Prevention Device Market
    • 18.3.3 Pneumatic Compression Device Market
      • 18.3.3.1 Sequential Compression Device Market
      • 18.3.3.1.1 Sequential Compression Pump Market
      • 18.3.3.1.2 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
      • 18.3.3.1.3 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market Unit Analysis
      • 18.3.3.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Device Market
      • 18.3.3.2.1 Calibrated Sequential Compression Pump Market
      • 18.3.3.2.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
  • 18.4 Drivers and Limiters
    • 18.4.1 Market Drivers
    • 18.4.2 Market Limiters
  • 18.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óÇ°À» ¼±Åà Áß
»óÇ° ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦