½ÃÀ庸°í¼­
»óǰÄÚµå
1451860

±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀå º¸°í¼­ : Á¦Ç°º°, ¿ëµµº°, ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°, Áö¿ªº°(2024-2032³â)

Traditional Wound Management Market Report by Product (Gauze, Tape, Bandages, Cotton), Application (Chronic Wounds, Acute Wounds), End User (Hospitals and Clinics, Home Healthcare, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, and Others), and Region 2024-2032

¹ßÇàÀÏ: | ¸®¼­Ä¡»ç: IMARC | ÆäÀÌÁö Á¤º¸: ¿µ¹® 142 Pages | ¹è¼Û¾È³» : 2-3ÀÏ (¿µ¾÷ÀÏ ±âÁØ)

    
    
    




¡Ø º» »óǰÀº ¿µ¹® ÀÚ·á·Î Çѱ۰ú ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¿¡ ºÒÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °æ¿ì ¿µ¹®À» ¿ì¼±ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¤È®ÇÑ °ËÅ並 À§ÇØ ¿µ¹® ¸ñÂ÷¸¦ Âü°íÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå ±Ô¸ð´Â 2023³â 57¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ÇâÈÄ IMARC GroupÀº 2024-2032³â ¿¬Æò±Õ ¼ºÀå·ü(CAGR) 3.67%·Î 2032³â 80¾ï ´Þ·¯¿¡ ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹ÃøÇß½À´Ï´Ù. ¸¸¼º ¹× ±Þ¼º »óóÀÇ Áõ°¡, ¼ö¼ú °Ç¼ö Áõ°¡, ±³Åë »ç¸Á »ç°í Áõ°¡, ÀÇ·á ÀÎÇÁ¶óÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ °³¼± µîÀÌ ½ÃÀåÀ» ÁÖµµÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÀÎÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸®´Â »óó¸¦ ±ú²ýÇÏ°Ô Çϰí, Ä¡À¯¸¦ ÃËÁøÇϰí, ÃâÇ÷À» ¸ØÃß±â À§ÇØ ÀÓ»ó µå·¹½Ì Àç·á, ¸é ÆÐµå, °ÅÁî µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ Ã¢»ó °ü¸® Á¦Ç°À» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸»ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »óó¾× Èí¼ö, °¨¿° °ü¸® ¹× ¿¹¹æ, ±â°èÀû ¿µÇâ ¾ïÁ¦, Äݶó°Õ ¼º¼÷À» µ½½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ »óó¸¦ ¿À¿°À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ º¸È£ÇÏ´Â È¿°úµµ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î »ïÃâ¾× ¼öÁØÀÌ °æ¹ÌÇÑ ±Þ¼º ¹× ¸¸¼º »óó¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇϸç ÀÏÂ÷ ¶Ç´Â ÀÌÂ÷ µå·¹½Ì Àç·á·Î »ç¿ëµË´Ï´Ù. ¿Ü°úÀû Àý°³Ã¢, ´ç´¢º´¼º Á·ºÎ±Ë¾ç, ¿åâ, Á¤¸Æ¼º ÇÏÁö±Ë¾ç, µ¿¸Æ¼º ±Ë¾ç µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¸¸¼º â»ó °ü¸®¿¡ ³Î¸® »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸®´Â Àü ¼¼°è È­»ó, ¿Ü»ó, ºÎ»ó ¹× ¼ö¼ú »óó Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÀÇ·á ȯ°æ¿¡¼­ ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ:

±Þ¼º »óó¿Í °æ¹ÌÇÑ »óóÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» À̲ô´Â ÁÖ¿ä ¿äÀÎ Áß ÇϳªÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, Àü ¼¼°èÀûÀ¸·Î ¼ö¼ú °Ç¼ö°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¼ö¼ú ºÎÀ§ °¨¿°(SSI) ¿¹¹æ, Ä¡·á °á°ú °³¼±, ȯÀÚ °ü¸® °­È­, ÀÔ¿ø ±â°£ ´ÜÃàÀ» À§ÇÑ ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® Á¦Ç°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¿ä°¡ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹è°æ¿¡´Â Èí¿¬ ½À°ü, ÁÂ½Ä »ýȰ½À°ü, °úµµÇÑ À½ÁÖ µîÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ºñ´¢±â°ú Áúȯ, ¾Ï, ½ÉÇ÷°ü Áúȯ(CVD), ½Å°æÇ÷°ü Áúȯ, ºñ¸¸, ´ç´¢º´ µî ¸¸¼ºÁúȯÀÇ À¯º´·üÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁø °ÍÀÌ ¿øÀÎÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¿Ü¿¡µµ ¿Ü·¡ ¼ö¼ú¼¾ÅÍ(ASC)ÀÇ ±ÞÁõ°ú ±³Åë »ç¸Á»ç°íÀÇ Áõ°¡µµ Á¦Ç° ¼ö¿ä¸¦ ÀÚ±ØÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¿Ü·¡ ¹× ¿Ü·¡ ȯÀÚ ¼¾ÅÍ¿¡¼­ ÷´Ü »óó Ä¡·áÀÇ Ã¤ÅÃÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °Íµµ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í ÇÔ²² À¯¸®ÇÑ »óȯ Á¤Ã¥ÀÌ ³Î¸® ÀÌ¿ë °¡´ÉÇÏ°í °¢±¹ Á¤ºÎ°¡ ÀÇ·á ÀÎÇÁ¶ó °³¼±¿¡ ¸¹Àº ÅõÀÚ¸¦ Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °Íµµ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» ÃËÁøÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ½ºÇÁ·¹ÀÌ ºØ´ë, ½º¸¶Æ® ºØ´ë, »õ·Î¿î ±¹¼Ò ¿¬°í, Á¢Âø ºØ´ë µðÀÚÀÎ º¯Çü µî ÁÖ¿ä ¾÷üµéÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ Á¦Ç° Çõ½ÅÀÌ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀåÀ» °ßÀÎÇϰí ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ ¹Û¿¡µµ ³ëÀÎ Àα¸ Áõ°¡, ÃÖ¼Òħ½À(MI) ¹Ì¿ë ½Ã¼úÀÇ Ã¤Åà Áõ°¡, ÀçÅà ÀÇ·á Æ®·»µåÀÇ ºÎ»ó, ¼ÒºñÀÚ ÀÇ·áºñ ÁöÃâ Áõ°¡, ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ R&D Ȱµ¿ µîÀÌ ½ÃÀå ¼ºÀå¿¡ ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµË´Ï´Ù.

º» º¸°í¼­¿¡¼­ ´Ù·ç´Â ÁÖ¿ä Áú¹®

  • Àü ¼¼°è ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀº Áö±Ý±îÁö ¾î¶»°Ô ¼ºÀåÇØ ¿ÔÀ»±î?
  • ¼¼°è ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀÇ ½ÃÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ ¹× ±âȸ´Â ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
  • °¢ ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ ¹× ±âȸ°¡ ¼¼°è ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
  • ÁÖ¿ä Áö¿ª ½ÃÀåÀº?
  • °¡Àå ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀº ¾î´À ±¹°¡Àΰ¡?
  • Á¦Ç°º° ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®Àº?
  • ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ Á¦Ç°Àº?
  • ¿ëµµº° ½ÃÀå ³»¿ªÀº?
  • ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ ¿ëµµ´Â?
  • ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº° ½ÃÀå ºÐ¼®Àº?
  • ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸Å·ÂÀûÀÎ ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚ´Â ´©±¸Àΰ¡?
  • Àü ¼¼°è ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀÇ °æÀï ±¸Á¶´Â?
  • Àü ¼¼°è ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ½ÃÀåÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä Ç÷¹À̾î/±â¾÷Àº?

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦1Àå ¼­¹®

Á¦2Àå Á¶»ç ¹üÀ§¿Í Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

  • Á¶»ç ¸ñÀû
  • ÀÌÇØ°ü°èÀÚ
  • µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼Ò½º
    • 1Â÷ Á¤º¸
    • 2Â÷ Á¤º¸
  • ½ÃÀå ÃßÁ¤
    • »óÇâ½Ä Á¢±Ù
    • ÇÏÇâ½Ä Á¢±Ù
  • Á¶»ç ¹æ¹ý

Á¦3Àå ÁÖ¿ä ¿ä¾à

Á¦4Àå ¼Ò°³

  • °³¿ä
  • ÁÖ¿ä »ê¾÷ µ¿Çâ

Á¦5Àå ±âÁ¸ â»ó °ü¸® ¼¼°è ½ÃÀå

  • ½ÃÀå °³¿ä
  • ½ÃÀå ½ÇÀû
  • COVID-19ÀÇ ¿µÇâ
  • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø

Á¦6Àå ½ÃÀå ³»¿ª : Á¦Ç°º°

  • °ÅÁî
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • Å×ÀÌÇÁ
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ºØ´ë
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ¸é
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø

Á¦7Àå ½ÃÀå ³»¿ª : ¿ëµµº°

  • ¸¸¼º â»ó
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ±Þ¼º â»ó
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø

Á¦8Àå ½ÃÀå ³»¿ª : ÃÖÁ¾»ç¿ëÀÚº°

  • º´¿ø¡¤Å¬¸®´Ð
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ÀçÅà ÇコÄɾî
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ¿Ü·¡ ¼ö¼ú ¼¾ÅÍ
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ±âŸ
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø

Á¦9Àå ½ÃÀå ³»¿ª : Áö¿ªº°

  • ºÏ¹Ì
    • ¹Ì±¹
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ij³ª´Ù
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÅÂÆò¾ç
    • Áß±¹
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ÀϺ»
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • Àεµ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • Çѱ¹
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • È£ÁÖ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • Àεµ³×½Ã¾Æ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ±âŸ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • À¯·´
    • µ¶ÀÏ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ÇÁ¶û½º
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ¿µ±¹
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ÀÌÅ»¸®¾Æ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ½ºÆäÀÎ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ·¯½Ã¾Æ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ±âŸ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • ¶óƾ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«
    • ºê¶óÁú
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ¸ß½ÃÄÚ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
    • ±âŸ
      • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
      • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø
  • Áßµ¿ ¹× ¾ÆÇÁ¸®Ä«
    • ½ÃÀå µ¿Çâ
    • ½ÃÀå ³»¿ª : ±¹°¡º°
    • ½ÃÀå ¿¹Ãø

Á¦10Àå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ, ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ, ±âȸ

  • ½ÃÀå °³¿ä
  • ¼ºÀå ÃËÁø¿äÀÎ
  • ¼ºÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿äÀÎ
  • ±âȸ

Á¦11Àå ¹ë·ùüÀÎ ºÐ¼®

Á¦12Àå Porter's Five Forces ºÐ¼®

  • °³¿ä
  • ±¸¸ÅÀÚÀÇ ±³¼··Â
  • °ø±Þ ±â¾÷ÀÇ ±³¼··Â
  • °æÀï Á¤µµ
  • ½Å±Ô Âü¿©¾÷üÀÇ À§Çù
  • ´ëüǰÀÇ À§Çù

Á¦13Àå °¡°Ý ºÐ¼®

Á¦14Àå °æÀï »óȲ

  • ½ÃÀå ±¸Á¶
  • ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷
  • ÁÖ¿ä ±â¾÷ °³¿ä
    • B. Braun Melsungen AG
    • Cardinal Health Inc.
    • Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd
    • DeRoyal Industries Inc.
    • Dukal LLC
    • Essity AB
    • Medtronic plc
    • Molnlycke Health Care AB
    • Paul Hartmann AG
    • Smith & Nephew plc
KSM 24.04.18

The global traditional wound management market size reached US$ 5.7 Billion in 2023. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach US$ 8.0 Billion by 2032, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 3.67% during 2024-2032. The rising prevalence of chronic and acute wounds, the increasing number of surgical procedures, escalating incidences of fatal road accidents, and ongoing improvements in healthcare infrastructure represent some of the key factors driving the market.

Traditional wound management refers to the use of various wound care products, such as clinical dressings, cotton pads, and gauzes, to clean the wound, promote faster healing, and stop bleeding. It aids in absorbing wound fluids, managing and preventing infections, controlling mechanical influences, and improving collagen maturation. It also assists in protecting the wound from contamination and is generally preferred for acute and chronic wounds with mild exudate levels and employed as primary or secondary dressings. It is widely used to manage a range of chronic wounds, such as surgical incisions, diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and arterial ulcers. As a result, traditional wound management finds extensive applications in healthcare settings for treating burns, trauma, injuries, and surgical wounds across the globe.

Traditional Wound Management Market Trends:

The rising instances of acute wounds and minor injuries represent one of the key factors supporting the market growth. Moreover, the increasing number of surgical procedures across the globe has generated the need for traditional wound management products to prevent surgical-site infections (SSIs), improve treatment outcomes, enhance patient care, and reduce the duration of hospital stays. This can be attributed to the high prevalence of chronic diseases, such as urological disorders, cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), neurovascular conditions, obesity, and diabetes, due to smoking habits, sedentary lifestyles, and excessive alcohol consumption. Besides this, a surge in the establishment of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and the escalating incidences of fatal road accidents have catalyzed product demand. In addition, the rising adoption of advanced wound care practices in ambulatory and outpatient centers is augmenting the market growth. In line with this, the widespread availability of favorable reimbursement policies and heavy investments by governments of various countries in improving healthcare infrastructure has propelled market growth. Furthermore, ongoing product innovations by key players, such as the launch of spray and smart bandages, new topical ointments, and design variations in adhesive bandages, are driving the market toward growth. Other factors, including the expanding geriatric population, increasing adoption of minimally invasive (MI) cosmetic procedures, emerging home healthcare trends, inflating consumer healthcare spending, and extensive research and development (R&D) activities, are also anticipated to provide a positive thrust to the market growth.

Key Market Segmentation:

IMARC Group provides an analysis of the key trends in each segment of the global traditional wound management market, along with forecasts at the global, regional, and country levels from 2024-2032. Our report has categorized the market based on product, application, and end user.

Product Insights:

Gauze

Tape

Bandages

Cotton

The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the traditional wound management market based on the product. This includes gauze, tape, bandages, and cotton. According to the report, gauze represented the largest segment.

Application Insights:

Chronic Wounds

Acute Wounds

A detailed breakup and analysis of the traditional wound management market based on the application has also been provided in the report. This includes chronic wounds and acute wounds. According to the report, acute wounds accounted for the largest market share.

End User Insights:

Hospitals and Clinics

Home Healthcare

Ambulatory Surgical Centers

Others

The report has provided a detailed breakup and analysis of the traditional wound management market based on the end user. This includes hospitals and clinics, home healthcare, ambulatory surgical centers, and others.

Regional Insights:

North America

United States

Canada

Asia-Pacific

China

Japan

India

South Korea

Australia

Indonesia

Others

Europe

Germany

France

United Kingdom

Italy

Spain

Russia

Others

Latin America

Brazil

Mexico

Others

Middle East and Africa

The report has also provided a comprehensive analysis of all the major regional markets, which include North America (the United States and Canada); Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, and others); Europe (Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia, and others); Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, and others); and the Middle East and Africa. According to the report, North America was the largest market for traditional wound management. Some of the factors driving the North America traditional wound management market included its aging population, growing burden of cancer, high healthcare expenditure, rising number of ASCs in the region, etc.

Competitive Landscape:

The report has also provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape in the global traditional wound management market. Detailed profiles of all major companies have been provided. Some of the companies covered include B. Braun Melsungen AG, Cardinal Health Inc., Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd., DeRoyal Industries Inc., Dukal LLC, Essity AB, Medtronic plc, Molnlycke Health Care AB, Paul Hartmann AG, Smith & Nephew plc, etc. Kindly note that this only represents a partial list of companies, and the complete list has been provided in the report.

Key Questions Answered in This Report:

  • How has the global traditional wound management market performed so far, and how will it perform in the coming years?
  • What are the drivers, restraints, and opportunities in the global traditional wound management market?
  • What is the impact of each driver, restraint, and opportunity on the global traditional wound management market?
  • What are the key regional markets?
  • Which countries represent the most attractive traditional wound management market?
  • What is the breakup of the market based on the product?
  • Which is the most attractive product in the traditional wound management market?
  • What is the breakup of the market based on the application?
  • Which is the most attractive application in the traditional wound management market?
  • What is the breakup of the market based on the end user?
  • Which is the most attractive end user in the traditional wound management market?
  • What is the competitive structure of the global traditional wound management market?
  • Who are the key players/companies in the global traditional wound management market?

Table of Contents

1 Preface

2 Scope and Methodology

  • 2.1 Objectives of the Study
  • 2.2 Stakeholders
  • 2.3 Data Sources
    • 2.3.1 Primary Sources
    • 2.3.2 Secondary Sources
  • 2.4 Market Estimation
    • 2.4.1 Bottom-Up Approach
    • 2.4.2 Top-Down Approach
  • 2.5 Forecasting Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Introduction

  • 4.1 Overview
  • 4.2 Key Industry Trends

5 Global Traditional Wound Management Market

  • 5.1 Market Overview
  • 5.2 Market Performance
  • 5.3 Impact of COVID-19
  • 5.4 Market Forecast

6 Market Breakup by Product

  • 6.1 Gauze
    • 6.1.1 Market Trends
    • 6.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 6.2 Tape
    • 6.2.1 Market Trends
    • 6.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 6.3 Bandages
    • 6.3.1 Market Trends
    • 6.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 6.4 Cotton
    • 6.4.1 Market Trends
    • 6.4.2 Market Forecast

7 Market Breakup by Application

  • 7.1 Chronic Wounds
    • 7.1.1 Market Trends
    • 7.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 7.2 Acute Wounds
    • 7.2.1 Market Trends
    • 7.2.2 Market Forecast

8 Market Breakup by End User

  • 8.1 Hospitals and Clinics
    • 8.1.1 Market Trends
    • 8.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 8.2 Home Healthcare
    • 8.2.1 Market Trends
    • 8.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 8.3 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 8.3.1 Market Trends
    • 8.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 8.4 Others
    • 8.4.1 Market Trends
    • 8.4.2 Market Forecast

9 Market Breakup by Region

  • 9.1 North America
    • 9.1.1 United States
      • 9.1.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.1.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.1.2 Canada
      • 9.1.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.1.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2 Asia-Pacific
    • 9.2.1 China
      • 9.2.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.2 Japan
      • 9.2.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.2.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.3 India
      • 9.2.3.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.3.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.4 South Korea
      • 9.2.4.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.4.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.5 Australia
      • 9.2.5.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.5.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.6 Indonesia
      • 9.2.6.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.6.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.7 Others
      • 9.2.7.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.7.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3 Europe
    • 9.3.1 Germany
      • 9.3.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.2 France
      • 9.3.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.2.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.3 United Kingdom
      • 9.3.3.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.3.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.4 Italy
      • 9.3.4.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.4.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.5 Spain
      • 9.3.5.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.5.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.6 Russia
      • 9.3.6.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.6.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.7 Others
      • 9.3.7.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.7.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.4 Latin America
    • 9.4.1 Brazil
      • 9.4.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.4.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.4.2 Mexico
      • 9.4.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.4.2.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.4.3 Others
      • 9.4.3.1 Market Trends
      • 9.4.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 9.5.1 Market Trends
    • 9.5.2 Market Breakup by Country
    • 9.5.3 Market Forecast

10 Drivers, Restraints, and Opportunities

  • 10.1 Overview
  • 10.2 Drivers
  • 10.3 Restraints
  • 10.4 Opportunities

11 Value Chain Analysis

12 Porters Five Forces Analysis

  • 12.1 Overview
  • 12.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 12.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 12.4 Degree of Competition
  • 12.5 Threat of New Entrants
  • 12.6 Threat of Substitutes

13 Price Analysis

14 Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1 Market Structure
  • 14.2 Key Players
  • 14.3 Profiles of Key Players
    • 14.3.1 B. Braun Melsungen AG
      • 14.3.1.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.1.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.1.3 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.2 Cardinal Health Inc.
      • 14.3.2.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.2.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.2.3 Financials
      • 14.3.2.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.3 Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd
      • 14.3.3.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.3.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.4 DeRoyal Industries Inc.
      • 14.3.4.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.4.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.5 Dukal LLC
      • 14.3.5.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.5.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.6 Essity AB
      • 14.3.6.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.6.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.6.3 Financials
    • 14.3.7 Medtronic plc
      • 14.3.7.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.7.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.7.3 Financials
      • 14.3.7.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.8 Molnlycke Health Care AB
      • 14.3.8.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.8.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.8.3 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.9 Paul Hartmann AG
      • 14.3.9.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.9.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.9.3 Financials
      • 14.3.9.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.10 Smith & Nephew plc
      • 14.3.10.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.10.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.10.3 Financials
      • 14.3.10.4 SWOT Analysis

Kindly note that this only represents a partial list of companies, and the complete list has been provided in the report.

ºñ±³¸®½ºÆ®
0 °ÇÀÇ »óǰÀ» ¼±Åà Áß
»óǰ ºñ±³Çϱâ
Àüü»èÁ¦