시장보고서
상품코드
1831948

외상용 내고정 기기 시장 보고서 : 제품, 재료, 최종사용자, 지역별(2025-2033년)

Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market Report by Product, Material (Stainless Steel, Nitinol, Titanium, Tritium, Polyether Ether Ketone ), End User, and Region 2025-2033

발행일: | 리서치사: IMARC | 페이지 정보: 영문 144 Pages | 배송안내 : 2-3일 (영업일 기준)

    
    
    




※ 본 상품은 영문 자료로 한글과 영문 목차에 불일치하는 내용이 있을 경우 영문을 우선합니다. 정확한 검토를 위해 영문 목차를 참고해주시기 바랍니다.

세계의 외상용 내고정 기기 시장 규모는 2024년에 107억 달러에 달했습니다. 향후 IMARC Group은 2033년에는 158억 달러에 달하며, 2025-2033년에 4.23%의 성장률(CAGR)을 보일 것으로 예측하고 있습니다. 이 시장은 재료 및 디자인 혁신, 저침습 수술, 고령자 증가 등에 대한 수요의 가속화가 두드러진 요인으로 작용하고 있습니다. 또한 이러한 요인들은 환자의 예후를 개선하고 회복 기간을 연장하며, 전 세계에서 최첨단 외상 고정 솔루션의 채택을 촉진하여 시장 성장을 가속하고 있습니다.

외상용 내부 고정장치 시장 동향

최소침습 수술에 대한 수요 증가

최소침습 수술에 대한 선호도가 높아지는 것은 세계 시장 성장에 큰 영향을 미치는 주요 동향 중 하나입니다. 이러한 수술은 수술 후 문제를 줄이고 회복 시간을 단축시킵니다. 2024년 3월 Brain and Spine 저널에 게재된 연구 논문에 따르면 척추 골절에 대한 최소침습수술(MIS)은 기존 개복수술에 비해 삶의 질 향상, 요통 감소, 장애 감소를 보였습니다. 또한 기존 개복수술을 받은 환자의 54%가 진통제를 필요로 한 반면, MIS 환자의 30%만이 진통제를 필요로 한 것으로 나타났습니다. 또한 보다 효과적이고 컴팩트한 고정 장치와 같은 기술 혁신이 이러한 추세에 큰 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 또한 많은 의료 서비스 프로바이더와 외과의사들은 특히 고령 환자의 골절뿐만 아니라 외상 치료에도 이러한 기기를 활용하고 있으며, 이는 외상내 고정 장치에 대한 수요와 환자 결과의 전반적인 개선에 더욱 기여하고 있습니다.

고령자 증가

세계에서 고령화 인구 증가는 외상용 내과적 고정장치 시장 확대에 크게 기여하고 있습니다. 유엔에 따르면 80세 이상 인구는 가속적으로 증가하고 있습니다. 또한 2050년에는 65세 이상 노인 인구가 약 16억 명에 달할 것으로 예측되고 있습니다. 노년층은 정형외과적 질환과 골절이 발생하기 쉽기 때문에 효율적인 외상 고정 솔루션에 대한 수요가 이 계층에서 빠르게 증가하고 있습니다. 또한 골다공증과 같은 뼈 관련 질환의 유병률 증가와 평균 수명의 연장은 이러한 고정 장치의 채택에 더욱 박차를 가하고 있습니다. 또한 의료 기관이 노인의 삶의 질을 높이기 위해 적극적으로 노력함에 따라 이러한 추세는 더욱 강화될 것으로 예상되며, 이는 세계 외상성 내부 고정 장치 시장의 성장을 촉진하고 있습니다.

고정장치의 기술 혁신

외상용 내과적 고정기구의 재료와 설계의 기술적 진보가 세계 시장의 역학에 큰 영향을 미치고 있습니다. 3D 프린팅과 생체흡수성 임플란트 개발은 내비게이션 및 영상 시스템의 개선과 함께 장치 내장 및 수술 결과를 향상시키고 있습니다. 예를 들어 2023년 4월, 센트럴 플로리다 대학은 더 나은 뼈 치유를 위해 마그네슘 복합재를 사용한 생체흡수성 막대, 나사, 핀 및 기타 다양한 임플란트를 개발했습니다. 이 생체흡수성 임플란트에는 뼈 재생을 촉진하는 나노입자도 포함되어 있습니다. 또한 이러한 발전은 보다 환자 중심의 정확한 치료 과정을 가능하게 하고, 재수술에 대한 수요를 낮추고, 회복 기간을 개선합니다. 또한 이 시장의 끊임없는 연구개발로 인해 보다 효율적인 외상 치료 솔루션의 혁신이 더욱 가속화될 것으로 예상되며, 이는 외상내 고정 장치 시장의 긍정적인 전망에 기여하고 있습니다.

목차

제1장 서문

제2장 조사 범위와 조사 방법

  • 조사의 목적
  • 이해관계자
  • 데이터 소스
    • 1차 정보
    • 2차 정보
  • 시장 추정
    • 보텀업 어프로치
    • 톱다운 어프로치
  • 조사 방법

제3장 개요

제4장 서론

제5장 세계의 외상용 내고정 기기 시장

  • 시장 개요
  • 시장 실적
  • COVID-19의 영향
  • 시장 예측

제6장 시장 내역 : 제품별

  • 폐쇄 기기
    • 주요 부문
      • 플레이트와 나사
      • 와이어
      • 클립과 핀
      • 봉과 못
      • 케이블
  • 골시멘트

제7장 시장 내역 : 재료별

  • 스테인리스
  • 니티놀
  • 티타늄
  • 트리튬
  • 폴리에테르에테르케톤(PEEK)

제8장 시장 내역 : 최종사용자별

  • 병원
  • 정형외과수술 센터
  • 외상 센터
  • 외래 센터

제9장 시장 내역 : 지역별

  • 북미
    • 미국
    • 캐나다
  • 아시아태평양
    • 중국
    • 일본
    • 인도
    • 한국
    • 호주
    • 인도네시아
    • 기타
  • 유럽
    • 독일
    • 프랑스
    • 영국
    • 이탈리아
    • 스페인
    • 러시아
    • 기타
  • 라틴아메리카
    • 브라질
    • 멕시코
    • 기타
  • 중동 및 아프리카

제10장 SWOT 분석

제11장 밸류체인 분석

제12장 Porter's Five Forces 분석

제13장 가격 분석

제14장 경쟁 구도

  • 시장 구조
  • 주요 기업
  • 주요 기업의 개요
    • Arthrex Inc.
    • B. Braun Melsungen AG
    • Globus Medical Inc.
    • Johnson & Johnson Private Limited
    • Medartis AG
    • Orthofix Medical Inc.
    • Orthopaedic Implant Company
    • OsteoMed(Berkshire Hathaway Inc.)
    • Smith & Nephew plc
    • Stryker Corporation
    • Zimmer Biomet
KSA 25.10.16

The global internal trauma fixation device market size reached USD 10.7 Billion in 2024. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach USD 15.8 Billion by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 4.23% during 2025-2033. The market is notably propelled by accelerating demand for technological innovations in device material and designing, nominally invasive surgeries, and an escalating geriatric population. In addition, such factors are improving patient outcomes, enhancing recovery periods, and boosting the adoption of cutting-edge trauma fixation solutions globally, thereby propelling the market growth.

Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market Trends:

Increasing Demand for Minimally Invasive Surgeries

The escalating preference for minimally invasive surgeries is one of the key trends significantly impacting the global market growth. Such procedures provide lowered post-operative issues and quicker recovery times. According to a research article published in the journal of Brain and Spine, in March 2024, a study result indicated that in comparison to traditional open surgery, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for spinal fractures exhibited better life quality, lowered back pain, and less disability. Furthermore, only 30% of MIS patients needed pain medication, compared to 54% of individuals who underwent traditional open surgery. Moreover, technological innovations, such as more effective and compact fixation devices, are substantially steering this trend. In addition, numerous healthcare providers and surgeons are currently leveraging these devices for treating traumas as well as fractures, especially in old-aged patients, which is further contributing to the internal trauma fixation device demand and overall enhancement of patient outcomes.

Increase in Geriatric Population

The global elevation in the aging population is substantially aiding the market expansion for internal trauma fixation device. According to the United Nations, the number of individuals aged 80 years or older are observed to be growing at an accelerated rate. Furthermore, it is projected that in the year 2050, number of individuals aged 65 or older will reach around 1.6 billion. The demand for efficient trauma fixation solutions is rapidly fueling among this segment of population as the old-aged individuals are more prone to orthopedic disorders and fractures. Moreover, the increasing prevalence of bone-associated diseases, like osteoporosis, and amplified life expectancy, are further fueling the adoption of these fixation devices. In addition, this trend is anticipated to bolster as healthcare organizations are actively emphasizing on enhancing the quality of life for elderly population, which, ultimately, boosts the global internal trauma fixation device market growth.

Technological Innovations in Fixation Devices

Technological advancements in the materials and design of internal trauma fixation devices are significantly steering the global market dynamics. The development of 3D-printed and bioabsorbable implants, coupled with improved navigation and imaging systems, is enhancing device incorporation as well as surgical outcomes. For instance, in April 2023, University of Central Florida developed bioabsorbable rods, screws, pins, and various other implants using magnesium composites for better bone healing. These bioabsorbable implants are also incorporated with nanoparticles to accelerate bone regeneration. In addition, such advancements permit for more patient-specific, accurate treatment processes, lowering the demand for follow-up surgeries and improving recovery periods. Moreover, constant research and development in this market is expected to further result in innovation of more efficient trauma care solution, thereby contributing to the positive internal trauma fixation device market outlook.

Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market Segmentation:

Breakup by Product:

  • Closure Device
    • Plates and Screws
    • Wires
    • Clips and Pins
    • Rods and Nails
    • Cables
  • Bone Cement

Closure device (plates and screws) accounts for the majority of the market share

According to the internal trauma fixation device market forecast, plates and screws are anticipated to sustain their dominance as closure device mainly because of their exceptional capability to offer durable and robust fixation for various types of fractures, which makes them requisite in surgical processes. Advancements in materials and designs have significantly enhanced their performance, resulting in a quicker recovery time and minimized complications. In addition, plates and screws are extensively preferred due to their versatile nature in mitigating complicated bone fractures, guaranteeing accuracy and long-term dependability for individuals undergoing trauma fixation surgeries.

Breakup by Material:

  • Stainless Steel
  • Nitinol
  • Titanium
  • Tritium
  • Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)

Stainless steel holds the largest share of the industry

As per the internal trauma fixation device market report, stainless steel is a widely utilized material in this market due to its cost-efficiency, durability, and robustness. Its high resistance against corrosion establishes it as a suitable material for long-term usage in implants, lowering the chances of infection in patients. In addition, the widespread availability and affordability of stainless steel position it as a preferrable material for numerous healthcare providers, especially in regions with restricted budgets. In spite of innovations in alternative materials, stainless steel continues to be depended upon for trauma fixation devices globally.

Breakup by End User:

  • Hospitals
  • Orthopedic Surgical Centers
  • Trauma Centers
  • Ambulatory Centers

Hospitals represent the leading market segment

According to the internal trauma fixation device market research report, hospitals have emerged as the leading end-user segment in the global market. They efficiently manage the majority of trauma cases demand surgical mediation, making them major consumers of such devices. In addition, the availability of cutting-edge medical facilities, extensive post-operative care, and trained surgeons in hospitals supports their market domination. Moreover, the increasing prevalence of trauma-related injuries, such as internal bleeding, organ damage, and bone fractures, fosters a steady demand for screws, plates, and other fixation devices within the hospital premises globally. According to a research article published in August 2023, by 2050, the annual cases of hip fractures around the world are anticipated to increase to 5-21 million.

Breakup by Region:

  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Indonesia
    • Others
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Russia
    • Others
  • Latin America
    • Brazil
    • Mexico
    • Others
  • Middle East and Africa

North America leads the market, accounting for the largest internal trauma fixation device market share

The report has also provided a comprehensive analysis of all the major regional markets, which include North America (the United States and Canada); Europe (Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia, and others); Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, and others); Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, and others); and the Middle East and Africa. According to the report, North America represents the largest regional market for internal trauma fixation device.

North America is leading the global internal trauma fixation market, majorly supported by upgraded healthcare systems, increasing population of aged individuals, and elevated medical spendings. The region notably profits from robust research and development projects, coupled with beneficial regulatory policies. Moreover, the rising cases of various orthopedic conditions as well as fractures, along with easy access to advanced medical facilities, significantly fuel the demand for such devices in the region. As per recent study data, orthopedic conditions such as anterior cruciate ligament ruptures are commonly observed in trauma victims, with 100,000 to 200,000 such incidents recorded annually in the U.S. In addition, the heightening awareness regarding early diagnosis as well as treatment of internal trauma further strengthens North America's position as the dominant region in the global market for internal trauma fixation device.

Competitive Landscape:

  • The market research report has also provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape in the market. Detailed profiles of all major companies have also been provided. Some of the major market players in the internal trauma fixation device industry include Arthrex Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, Globus Medical Inc., Johnson & Johnson Private Limited, Medartis AG, Orthofix Medical Inc., Orthopaedic Implant Company, OsteoMed (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.), Smith & Nephew plc, Stryker Corporation, and Zimmer Biomet.

(Please note that this is only a partial list of the key players, and the complete list is provided in the report.)

  • The competitive landscape is characterized by intense competition, with major players actively emphasizing on strategic collaborations, certifications and clearances from regulatory bodies, and product advancements to attain a competitive advantage. For instance, in October 2023, the TriLeap Lower Extremity Anatomic Plating System, developed by DePuy Synthes, a Johnson & Johnson company, was granted clearance by the US FDA and is anticipated to launch in 2024. This plating system can be utilized by surgeons for bone stabilization during fractures, bunionectomies, and osteotomies of the ankle or foot. Various companies are currently investing in research and development activities to enhance device efficiency and proliferate their product offerings. Moreover, well-established leaders in the market are also participating in acquisitions and mergers deals to fortify their foothold and tap into new markets. Whereas regional players are emphasizing on providing cost-efficient solution, addressing the needs of price-sensitive markets and extending their reach.

Key Questions Answered in This Report

  • 1.How big is the global internal trauma fixation device market?
  • 2.What is the expected growth rate of the global internal trauma fixation device market during 2025-2033?
  • 3.What are the key factors driving the global internal trauma fixation device market?
  • 4.What has been the impact of COVID-19 on the global internal trauma fixation device market?
  • 5.What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the product?
  • 6.What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the material?
  • 7.What is the breakup of the global internal trauma fixation device market based on the end user?
  • 8.What are the key regions in the global internal trauma fixation device market?
  • 9.Who are the key players/companies in the global internal trauma fixation device market?

Table of Contents

1 Preface

2 Scope and Methodology

  • 2.1 Objectives of the Study
  • 2.2 Stakeholders
  • 2.3 Data Sources
    • 2.3.1 Primary Sources
    • 2.3.2 Secondary Sources
  • 2.4 Market Estimation
    • 2.4.1 Bottom-Up Approach
    • 2.4.2 Top-Down Approach
  • 2.5 Forecasting Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Introduction

  • 4.1 Overview
  • 4.2 Key Industry Trends

5 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Device Market

  • 5.1 Market Overview
  • 5.2 Market Performance
  • 5.3 Impact of COVID-19
  • 5.4 Market Forecast

6 Market Breakup by Product

  • 6.1 Closure Device
    • 6.1.1 Market Trends
    • 6.1.2 Key Segments
      • 6.1.2.1 Plates and Screws
      • 6.1.2.2 Wires
      • 6.1.2.3 Clips and Pins
      • 6.1.2.4 Rods and Nails
      • 6.1.2.5 Cables
    • 6.1.3 Market Forecast
  • 6.2 Bone Cement
    • 6.2.1 Market Trends
    • 6.2.2 Market Forecast

7 Market Breakup by Material

  • 7.1 Stainless Steel
    • 7.1.1 Market Trends
    • 7.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 7.2 Nitinol
    • 7.2.1 Market Trends
    • 7.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 7.3 Titanium
    • 7.3.1 Market Trends
    • 7.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 7.4 Tritium
    • 7.4.1 Market Trends
    • 7.4.2 Market Forecast
  • 7.5 Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)
    • 7.5.1 Market Trends
    • 7.5.2 Market Forecast

8 Market Breakup by End User

  • 8.1 Hospitals
    • 8.1.1 Market Trends
    • 8.1.2 Market Forecast
  • 8.2 Orthopedic Surgical Centers
    • 8.2.1 Market Trends
    • 8.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 8.3 Trauma Centers
    • 8.3.1 Market Trends
    • 8.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 8.4 Ambulatory Centers
    • 8.4.1 Market Trends
    • 8.4.2 Market Forecast

9 Market Breakup by Region

  • 9.1 North America
    • 9.1.1 United States
      • 9.1.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.1.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.1.2 Canada
      • 9.1.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.1.2.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.2 Asia-Pacific
    • 9.2.1 China
      • 9.2.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.2 Japan
      • 9.2.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.2.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.3 India
      • 9.2.3.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.3.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.4 South Korea
      • 9.2.4.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.4.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.5 Australia
      • 9.2.5.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.5.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.6 Indonesia
      • 9.2.6.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.6.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.2.7 Others
      • 9.2.7.1 Market Trends
      • 9.2.7.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.3 Europe
    • 9.3.1 Germany
      • 9.3.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.2 France
      • 9.3.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.2.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.3 United Kingdom
      • 9.3.3.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.3.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.4 Italy
      • 9.3.4.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.4.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.5 Spain
      • 9.3.5.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.5.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.6 Russia
      • 9.3.6.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.6.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.3.7 Others
      • 9.3.7.1 Market Trends
      • 9.3.7.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.4 Latin America
    • 9.4.1 Brazil
      • 9.4.1.1 Market Trends
      • 9.4.1.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.4.2 Mexico
      • 9.4.2.1 Market Trends
      • 9.4.2.2 Market Forecast
    • 9.4.3 Others
      • 9.4.3.1 Market Trends
      • 9.4.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 9.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 9.5.1 Market Trends
    • 9.5.2 Market Breakup by Country
    • 9.5.3 Market Forecast

10 SWOT Analysis

  • 10.1 Overview
  • 10.2 Strengths
  • 10.3 Weaknesses
  • 10.4 Opportunities
  • 10.5 Threats

11 Value Chain Analysis

12 Porters Five Forces Analysis

  • 12.1 Overview
  • 12.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 12.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 12.4 Degree of Competition
  • 12.5 Threat of New Entrants
  • 12.6 Threat of Substitutes

13 Price Analysis

14 Competitive Landscape

  • 14.1 Market Structure
  • 14.2 Key Players
  • 14.3 Profiles of Key Players
    • 14.3.1 Arthrex Inc.
      • 14.3.1.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.1.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.1.3 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.2 B. Braun Melsungen AG
      • 14.3.2.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.2.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.2.3 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.3 Globus Medical Inc.
      • 14.3.3.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.3.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.3.3 Financials
      • 14.3.3.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.4 Johnson & Johnson Private Limited
      • 14.3.4.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.4.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.4.3 Financials
      • 14.3.4.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.5 Medartis AG
      • 14.3.5.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.5.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.6 Orthofix Medical Inc.
      • 14.3.6.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.6.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.6.3 Financials
      • 14.3.6.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.7 Orthopaedic Implant Company
      • 14.3.7.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.7.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.8 OsteoMed (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.)
      • 14.3.8.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.8.2 Product Portfolio
    • 14.3.9 Smith & Nephew plc
      • 14.3.9.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.9.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.9.3 Financials
      • 14.3.9.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.10 Stryker Corporation
      • 14.3.10.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.10.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.10.3 Financials
      • 14.3.10.4 SWOT Analysis
    • 14.3.11 Zimmer Biomet
      • 14.3.11.1 Company Overview
      • 14.3.11.2 Product Portfolio
      • 14.3.11.3 Financials
      • 14.3.11.4 SWOT Analysis
샘플 요청 목록
0 건의 상품을 선택 중
목록 보기
전체삭제