탄소 포집 및 저장 시장 : 서비스, 기술, 최종 용도 산업, 저장 형태별 - 세계 예측(2025-2030년)

The Carbon Capture & Storage Market was valued at USD 7.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 7.73 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 9.67%, reaching USD 12.34 billion by 2030.

A concise and authoritative introduction connecting technology pathways, industrial drivers, and service needs to practical deployment challenges and strategic decision levers

The carbon capture and storage landscape stands at an inflection point as organizations across heavy industry and energy sectors confront increasingly stringent decarbonization imperatives and evolving policy frameworks. This executive summary synthesizes the most salient dynamics shaping adoption, technology pathways, service requirements, and regional deployment conditions. Readers will find an integrated perspective that connects operational realities at industrial facilities with storage site characteristics, transport logistics, and the emergent commercial models that underpin viable project pipelines.

This introduction frames the discussion by linking technical progress-such as advances across oxy-fuel combustion, post-combustion approaches including solvent-based and sorbent-based systems, and pre-combustion options-to the practical service demands for capture, monitoring and verification, operations and maintenance, transport, and storage. It also situates end-use industry drivers, from cement and chemicals to iron and steel, within a broader context of capital allocation, regulatory signals, and public acceptance. The aim is to equip senior leaders with a concise, actionable orientation to the critical trade-offs and decision levers that will determine which projects move from concept to sustained operation.

Throughout the following sections, the analysis emphasizes where technological maturity converges with commercial readiness, how value chains must adapt to shifting policy landscapes, and where strategic investments will be necessary to scale capture, transport, and storage solutions responsibly and effectively.

Transformative shifts driven by policy maturation, technological progress, financing evolution, and stakeholder expectations reshaping project viability and competitive advantage

The next wave of transformation in carbon capture and storage will be driven by converging shifts across policy, technology, and capital markets that reshape project economics and risk allocation. Policy instruments are transitioning from pilot incentives to durable regulatory frameworks that influence both demand for capture services and the architecture of cross-border trade in emissions-intensive goods. Concurrently, technology improvements in capture efficiency and cost reductions for monitoring and verification tools are lowering barriers to commercial deployment, while innovations in transport logistics and storage characterization are expanding feasible project designs.

Private capital and public financing mechanisms are adjusting to new risk profiles, favoring integrated project structures and long-term offtake arrangements that align capture capacity with storage commitments. At the same time, industrial adopters are reassessing operational practices to integrate capture into existing sites, prompting growth in specialized service offerings across operations and maintenance and long-term monitoring. Social license and stakeholder engagement are also becoming material considerations, pushing developers to embed community benefits and robust environmental safeguards into project planning. Taken together, these shifts are remapping competitive advantages: entities that can orchestrate multi-disciplinary execution, secure long-term revenue streams, and demonstrate credible environmental performance will lead the transition.

Assessment of how 2025 United States tariff measures have reshaped procurement strategies, supply-chain resilience, contractual risk allocation, and project timelines

United States tariff actions implemented in 2025 have introduced a layer of trade policy complexity that affects supply chains for capture equipment, transport components, and storage-related services. Tariffs on imported components have increased acquisition costs for select technologies, particularly those reliant on specialized materials and precision manufacturing. As a consequence, procurement strategies are adapting: project sponsors are diversifying supplier portfolios, accelerating nearshoring where feasible, and exploring alternative technical configurations that reduce exposure to tariff-sensitive inputs.

The cumulative impact extends beyond direct equipment costs to influence timing and risk allocation for international joint ventures and cross-border storage arrangements. Developers and EPC contractors are revising contracts to include broader change-in-law clauses and re-evaluating logistical routes to optimize total landed costs. Additionally, tariff-driven inflation pressures have amplified the importance of value engineering and modular construction approaches that can mitigate schedule and cost risks. Policymakers and industry stakeholders are responding by exploring targeted incentives for domestic manufacturing of critical components and by engaging in dialogue on trade remedies that balance industrial policy objectives with the need to maintain access to global technology pools. In sum, tariffs have heightened the strategic salience of supply-chain resilience, contract flexibility, and local industrial capacity in project planning.

Comprehensive segmentation insights linking service lines, technology pathways, end-use industry profiles, and storage formations to deployment strategy and R&D priorities

Understanding segmentation dynamics is essential for designing business models and prioritizing R&D and commercial efforts. Analysis by service reveals distinct value pools across capture, monitoring and verification, operations and maintenance, storage, and transport, each with unique delivery models and skill sets required for scalable deployment. On the technology front, pathways such as oxy-fuel combustion, post-combustion, and pre-combustion present different retrofit and greenfield opportunities, with post-combustion further distinguished by solvent-based and sorbent-based options that vary in plant integration complexity and solvent regeneration needs.

End-use industry segmentation highlights how decarbonization roadmaps diverge across cement, chemicals and petrochemicals, iron and steel, oil and gas, power generation, and refining, with each sector exhibiting different CO2 concentration profiles, operational cycles, and regulatory exposures that influence technology selection and service demand. Storage formation segmentation underscores the technical and commercial trade-offs between basalt and mineralization approaches, coal seam opportunities, depleted oil and gas reservoirs, and saline aquifers, which differ in injectivity characteristics, containment risk profiles, and monitoring requirements. Integrating these segmentation layers provides a granular lens for identifying where near-term deployments are most feasible, where technology innovation will unlock new opportunities, and how commercial models must be tailored to match sector- and formation-specific constraints.

Key regional dynamics and strategic implications for deployment pathways, partnership strategies, and infrastructure prioritization across global markets

Regional dynamics shape investment priorities, regulatory frameworks, and commercial partnerships that determine where projects progress beyond pilot stages. In the Americas, established energy infrastructure and policy incentives support a mix of industrial capture projects and transport networks, while public and private capital markets increasingly underwrite large-scale storage initiatives. Europe, Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where ambitious climate targets and carbon pricing mechanisms in some jurisdictions accelerate demand for capture technologies, even as political and infrastructure challenges in other areas require tailored deployment approaches. Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapidly rising industrial emissions and strong interest in industrial decarbonization, prompting a surge in feasibility studies and government-backed demonstration programs.

These regional distinctions influence where companies concentrate manufacturing, where joint ventures and consortia form to de-risk projects, and how regulatory harmonization or divergence affects cross-border cooperation on transport and storage. Infrastructure endowments, land availability for storage, public acceptance, and the maturity of monitoring and verification regimes further modulate the speed and scale of adoption. Strategic actors will need to align their market entry and partnership strategies with regional policy signals and infrastructure realities to capture the most viable opportunities and avoid stranded investments.

Key company landscape and competitive dynamics emphasizing integrated service providers, technology specialists, financing partners, and collaborative project structures

Competitive dynamics are shaped by a diverse set of participants that include integrated energy companies, specialized engineering and EPC firms, independent technology developers focused on capture chemistries and sorbents, monitoring and verification specialists, and institutional investors seeking long-duration, low-carbon assets. Collaboration across these actor types is common, with consortia and public-private partnerships enabling risk sharing and pooling of technical expertise. Technology vendors are differentiating through demonstration-scale projects, performance guarantees, and service bundles that combine capture technology supply with long-term operations and maintenance capabilities.

Service providers that can deliver integrated offerings across capture, transport, storage characterization, and monitoring bring compelling value propositions to industrial clients who prefer single-source accountability. Meanwhile, niche suppliers that optimize for performance in specific industrial contexts-such as high-temperature cement kilns or low-pressure refining flue streams-remain strategically important for enabling targeted retrofits. Financial players and insurers are increasingly active in underwriting performance bonds and providing tailored risk-transfer instruments, which facilitates project bankability. The competitive landscape rewards entities that can prove repeatable delivery, secure robust offtake or revenue support mechanisms, and deploy adaptive business models that respond to localized regulatory and supply-chain conditions.

Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to de-risk projects, align supply chains, secure stakeholder buy-in, and accelerate repeatable deployment across regions

Industry leaders must adopt a proactive posture to convert policy momentum and technology progress into reliable, investable project pipelines. First, prioritize building resilient supply chains by diversifying suppliers, evaluating nearshoring for critical components, and incorporating flexible contract language to manage tariff and regulatory risk. Second, pursue integrated service models that combine capture delivery with long-term operations, transport logistics, and storage commitments to reduce interface risk for industrial offtakers.

Third, invest in demonstration projects that de-risk novel capture chemistries and monitoring technologies, while documenting performance outcomes that can be replicated across similar industrial sites. Fourth, engage early with regulators and local stakeholders to shape permitting timelines, establish clear monitoring and verification expectations, and secure social license through community benefit agreements. Fifth, structure financing with blended capital approaches that leverage public guarantees and concessional finance to lower the perceived technology and revenue risk for private investors. Finally, develop modular and standardized project components to shorten schedules and enable repeatable rollouts across multiple facilities and regions. These actions, taken together, will materially increase the probability that projects transition from pilot to scale in a fiscally prudent and socially responsible manner.

Robust mixed-methods research methodology combining primary interviews, technical benchmarking, policy analysis, and triangulation to validate findings and surface uncertainties

The research methodology integrates a multi-source approach designed to ensure rigor, transparency, and relevance to decision-makers. Primary research included structured interviews with senior executives across energy, industrial, and financial sectors, complemented by consultations with technology developers, service providers, and regulatory authorities to capture operational realities and policy interpretations. Secondary research involved a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature, government publications, regulatory filings, technical white papers, and trade associations to compile a comprehensive evidence base that informs technology and service assessments.

Analytical techniques employed include qualitative synthesis of policy and regulatory frameworks, technical benchmarking of capture and storage solutions, and scenario-based analysis of supply-chain and tariff implications. Triangulation across primary and secondary inputs was used to validate key findings and to surface divergent perspectives. Special attention was paid to data provenance, ensuring that assumptions and methodological choices are documented and auditable. Where possible, case-study validation exercises were conducted to ground high-level observations in real-world project experiences, and sensitivity checks were applied to identify points of greatest uncertainty that warrant continued monitoring by stakeholders.

Concise conclusion synthesizing opportunity pathways, material risks, and the strategic capabilities required to achieve sustained commercial deployment

Bringing the analysis together, the carbon capture and storage ecosystem is moving from experimentation toward structured commercialization, driven by tighter policy expectations, maturing technologies, and evolving capital-market solutions. The interplay of service specialization, technology selection, end-use industry requirements, and storage formation characteristics creates a complex decision matrix for project sponsors. Success will favor organizations that align technological choices with the operational realities of targeted industries, secure durable revenue mechanisms, and demonstrate rigorous environmental stewardship through credible monitoring and verification.

Risk factors remain substantive-ranging from supply-chain disruptions and tariff-induced cost volatility to permitting delays and public acceptance challenges-but the toolkit for addressing these risks is also expanding. Strategic partnerships, blended finance, and standardized project components all contribute to lowering execution risk. Ultimately, leaders who integrate cross-functional capabilities, maintain adaptive procurement and contracting approaches, and engage transparently with stakeholders will be best positioned to translate policy momentum and technological progress into sustained deployment outcomes.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Define: Research Objective
• 2.2. Determine: Research Design
• 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
• 2.4. Collect: Data Source
• 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
• 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
• 2.7. Publish: Research Report
• 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

• 5.1. Government-led financing incentives accelerating large-scale carbon capture project deployment in industrial hubs
• 5.2. Advancements in solvent-based capture technology improving efficiency and lowering operational costs
• 5.3. Emergence of risk mitigation strategies in cross-border carbon transport and pipeline infrastructure development
• 5.4. Rising impact of international climate agreements in shaping carbon capture & storage risk frameworks
• 5.5. Development of underground saline aquifer storage capacity to secure long-term carbon sequestration
• 5.6. Emergence of carbon capture utilization in enhanced oil recovery and synthetic fuel production
• 5.7. Regulatory evolution of carbon credit markets boosting investment in measurement reporting and verification systems
• 5.8. Strategic partnerships between oil majors and technology startups to drive modular carbon capture solutions
• 5.9. Scaling cryogenic CO2 capture technologies for low-concentration industrial off-gas streams in chemical production
• 5.10. Integration of on-site CO2 compression and liquefaction systems to streamline transport logistics to shared storage hubs

6. Market Insights

• 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Service

• 8.1. Introduction
• 8.2. Capture
• 8.3. Monitoring & Verification
• 8.4. Operations & Maintenance
• 8.5. Storage
• 8.6. Transport

9. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Technology

• 9.1. Introduction
• 9.2. Oxy-Fuel Combustion
• 9.3. Post-Combustion
  • 9.3.1. Solvent Based
  • 9.3.2. Sorbent Based
• 9.4. Pre-Combustion

10. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by End-Use Industry

• 10.1. Introduction
• 10.2. Cement
• 10.3. Chemicals & Petrochemicals
• 10.4. Iron & Steel
• 10.5. Oil & Gas
• 10.6. Power Generation
• 10.7. Refining

11. Carbon Capture & Storage Market, by Storage Formation

• 11.1. Introduction
• 11.2. Basalt & Mineralization
• 11.3. Coal Seams
• 11.4. Depleted Oil & Gas Reservoirs
• 11.5. Saline Aquifers

12. Americas Carbon Capture & Storage Market

• 12.1. Introduction
• 12.2. United States
• 12.3. Canada
• 12.4. Mexico
• 12.5. Brazil
• 12.6. Argentina

13. Europe, Middle East & Africa Carbon Capture & Storage Market

• 13.1. Introduction
• 13.2. United Kingdom
• 13.3. Germany
• 13.4. France
• 13.5. Russia
• 13.6. Italy
• 13.7. Spain
• 13.8. United Arab Emirates
• 13.9. Saudi Arabia
• 13.10. South Africa
• 13.11. Denmark
• 13.12. Netherlands
• 13.13. Qatar
• 13.14. Finland
• 13.15. Sweden
• 13.16. Nigeria
• 13.17. Egypt
• 13.18. Turkey
• 13.19. Israel
• 13.20. Norway
• 13.21. Poland
• 13.22. Switzerland

14. Asia-Pacific Carbon Capture & Storage Market

• 14.1. Introduction
• 14.2. China
• 14.3. India
• 14.4. Japan
• 14.5. Australia
• 14.6. South Korea
• 14.7. Indonesia
• 14.8. Thailand
• 14.9. Philippines
• 14.10. Malaysia
• 14.11. Singapore
• 14.12. Vietnam
• 14.13. Taiwan

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 15.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 15.3.1. ABB Ltd.
  • 15.3.2. ArcelorMittal S.A.
  • 15.3.3. Baker Hughes Company
  • 15.3.4. Carbfix hf.
  • 15.3.5. Carbon Clean Solutions Limited
  • 15.3.6. Carbon Engineering Ltd. by Oxy Low Carbon Ventures, LLC
  • 15.3.7. Chevron Corporation
  • 15.3.8. Climeworks AG
  • 15.3.9. COWI A/S
  • 15.3.10. Eaton Corporation plc
  • 15.3.11. Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • 15.3.12. Fluor Corporation
  • 15.3.13. GE Vernova Group
  • 15.3.14. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
  • 15.3.15. Hitachi, Ltd.
  • 15.3.16. Honeywell International Inc.
  • 15.3.17. Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd.
  • 15.3.18. LanzaTech, Inc.
  • 15.3.19. Linde PLC
  • 15.3.20. MAN Energy Solutions SE by Volkswagen AG
  • 15.3.21. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • 15.3.22. PTT Exploration and Production Public Company Limited.
  • 15.3.23. SAIPEM SpA
  • 15.3.24. Santos Ltd.
  • 15.3.25. Saudi Arabian Oil Company
  • 15.3.26. Schlumberger Limited
  • 15.3.27. Shell PLC
  • 15.3.28. Siemens AG
  • 15.3.29. Technip Energies N.V.
  • 15.3.30. The EPCM Group
  • 15.3.31. TotalEnergies SE

16. ResearchAI

17. ResearchStatistics

18. ResearchContacts

19. ResearchArticles

20. Appendix