세계의 NOC as a Service 시장 : 서비스 유형별, 서포트 모델별, 업계별 - 예측(-2030년)

The NOC as a Service market is estimated to be USD 3.73 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 6.14 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of 10.5% from 2025 to 2030. NOC as a Service is evolving from a staff-augmentation line item to the operational backbone for hybrid and multi-cloud enterprises, as nonstop digital channels, remote work, and sprawling edge footprints expand incident surfaces and intensify audit scrutiny.

What buyers now procure are [outcomes across four scoped capabilities: Event Monitoring & Management that collapses alarm storms into a single actionable incident with change and topology context; Incident & Problem Management that executes runbooked diagnostics, carrier or provider escalations, and safe rollback to compress MTTR; Service Reporting & Analysis that delivers audit-ready MTTA/MTTR, alarm-to-ticket latency, patch adherence, and backup test-restore evidence; and Capacity & Change Management that governs patch windows, configuration baselines, and separation of duties. Providers differentiate themselves by activating Offsite coverage in weeks instead of quarters. They also extend Hybrid services for key Onsite changes and publish high-quality evidence packs suitable for executive review, ensuring they can withstand internal audits and regulator sampling. This approach is reflected in their platform-attached offerings, which combine 24/7 monitoring with patch management and backup disaster recovery (BDR) oversight. Additionally, they implement ISO-compliant multivendor programs that establish predefined escalation paths for regulated networks.

At the same time, adoption exposes execution gaps that separate leaders from the field: runbook immaturity, unclear RACI between Offsite and Onsite teams, and weak evidence discipline can stall transitions and jeopardize renewals in BFSI, healthcare & life sciences, and government & public sector. What high-performing programs do differently is industrialize correlation and suppression during the first sprints to cut duplicate noise double-digits, codify escalation timers and rollback in machine-readable playbooks, and tie renewals to measurable hygiene outcomes, patch adherence, and test-restore success, alongside MTTR ratchets. How this shapes the market is visible in contracting patterns: Offsite models capture the largest share due to 24/7 scale economics, Hybrid grows where privileged change control is non-negotiable, North America leads on platform attachment and audit culture, and Asia Pacific posts the fastest growth as multi-country estates standardize on Offsite operations with local Onsite benches. Why this persists is simple: evidence-first delivery converts uptime and compliance into budgeted outcomes, turning NOC as a Service from an optional cost takeout into a long-horizon resilience investment.

By service type, the event monitoring & management segment is estimated to lead the market during the forecast period

Event Monitoring & Management will anchor the largest market size because it is the highest-frequency, always-on workload that governs signal fidelity for every downstream NOC as a Service deliverable. What this entails is 24/7 telemetry ingestion across multivendor estates, correlation that collapses alarm storms into a single actionable incident, and context enrichment with topology and recent change data so that tickets are immediately actionable rather than diagnostic placeholders. Providers operationalize this at scale through engineered event pipelines and AIOps that auto-close transient conditions and suppress duplicates before they hit human tiers, which directly reduces alarm-to-ticket latency, compresses MTTA/MTTR, and lowers ticket volume per monitored endpoint. Why budgets concentrate here is straightforward: Incident & Problem Management, Service Reporting & Analysis, and Capacity & Change Management only perform to contract if the monitoring plane delivers high-quality, deduplicated incidents with change context attached; hence, procurement lands first on Event Monitoring & Management and then expands scope after correlation gains are evidenced. Instances underscore this primacy: ConnectWise positions NOC as a Service around continuous monitoring with integrated patch and BDR oversight, publishing alarm-to-ticket-to-fix reporting that partners use to prove noise reduction and SLA adherence; this evidence-first approach drives initial contract value to the monitoring layer before layered runbooks expand remediation scope. Fujitsu markets ISO-certified, multivendor monitoring that handles very large event volumes and executes predefined carrier escalations directly from runbooks, illustrating how high-fidelity monitoring and correlation sit at the center of commercial value in regulated and carrier-class environments.

By vertical, the BFSI segment is estimated to account for the largest market share during the forecast period

The BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance) segment is expected to command the largest market share because it purchases evidence-first NOC as a Service with explicit audit requirements that expand contract scope and term. BFSI buys an Offsite or Hybrid operating construct where Event Monitoring & Management are paired with runbook-driven Incident & Problem Management and monthly Service Reporting & Analysis packs containing MTTR, alarm-to-ticket latency, patch adherence, and backup test-restore proofs suitable for internal audit and regulators. Providers win BFSI by delivering ISO-anchored processes, strict separation of duties, and predefined escalation paths (including carrier escalations) with traceable approvals and rollback evidence. Thus, every action, from detection through change, is mapped to a runbook and reflected in reports that stand up to sampling and review. This translates to outsized spending as BFSI blends high network criticality with layered compliance, making it uneconomic to staff 24/7 internally while simultaneously requiring defensible evidence; subscription NOC as a Service with Hybrid change windows addresses both constraints and supports multi-year renewals. Instances show the pattern: Fujitsu's managed NOC emphasizes multivendor monitoring from ISO-certified facilities and runbooked carrier escalations with compliance-grade artifacts, a posture aligned to BFSI control expectations and board-level reporting cycles. Similarly, ConnectWise's reporting that maps alarm to ticket to fix gives MSPs serving financial institutions a repeatable evidence trail to pass customer audits and justify expanding the Offsite scope.

North America will lead in market share, while Asia Pacific is projected to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period

North America leads in market share while Asia Pacific delivers the highest growth because mature platform ecosystems and strict evidence expectations anchor current spend in North America, whereas rapid hybrid connectivity build-outs and co-sourcing models propel accelerated adoption in Asia Pacific. What characterizes North America is heavy reliance on productized Offsite NOC as a Service bundled with RMM and BCDR, executive-grade Service Reporting & Analysis, and standardized runbooks suited to compliance-sensitive sectors, which collectively translate into larger initial contracts and higher net retention across MSP and enterprise buyers. Asia Pacific will outgrow other regions through rapid SD-WAN and cloud-edge rollouts across multi-country enterprises that need 24/7 Event Monitoring & Management immediately and Hybrid models for privileged Onsite changes, enabling providers to activate coverage in weeks rather than quarters while aligning spend to MTTR and hygiene outcomes instead of headcount. Why this split persists is ecosystem maturity and governance: North America's deep MSP channels, platform attachment, and audit culture sustain the largest revenue base, while Asia Pacific's expansion and skills constraints create the steepest slope for NOC as a Service subscription as organizations standardize on Offsite operations with local Onsite benches. Instances reflect these dynamics: ConnectWise's North America-centric partner network attaches NOC as a Service to reduce overnight ticket loads and prove patch and backup hygiene in executive reviews, reinforcing regional share, while providers building Asia Pacific hubs leverage standardized monitoring and Hybrid change windows to win multi-country expansions across India, ASEAN, Japan, and ANZ at a faster clip than other regions.

Breakdown of Primary Interviews

The study contains insights from various industry experts, from solution vendors to Tier 1 companies. The breakdown of the primary interviews is as follows:

• By Company Type: Tier 1 - 35%, Tier 2 - 40%, and Tier 3 - 25%
• By Designation: C-level - 20%, Directors - 30%, and Others - 50%
• By Region: North America - 40%, Europe - 35%, Asia Pacific - 20%, Rest of the World - 5%

The major players in the NOC as a Service market are Fujitsu (Japan), Park Place Technologies (US), Kaseya (US), Sify Technologies (India), INOC (US), iGlass Networks (US), Infrassist Technologies (India), EXTNOC (US), Mission Control NOC (Canada), Worksent (US), ConnectWise (US), CHR Managed Services (US), Structured (US), Science Soft (US), Microscan Communications (India), CBS (US), Quadrang Systems (India), Futurism Technologies (US), Tailwind Voice & Data (US), Emapta (Philippines), and GCX (US). These players have adopted various growth strategies, such as partnerships, agreements, collaborations, product launches, product enhancements, and acquisitions, to expand their footprint in the NOC as a Service market.

Research Coverage

This study covers the NOC as a Service market size and the growth potential across different segments, including service type (Event Monitoring & Management, Incident & Problem Management, Service Reporting & Analysis, Capacity & Change Management), support model (Onsite, Offsite, Hybrid), vertical (Banking, Financial Services, & Insurance; Healthcare & Life Sciences; Government & Public Sector; Telecom & CSVS; IT & ITeS; Retail & E-commerce; Energy & Utilities; Transportation & Logistics), and region. The study includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the leading market players, their company profiles, key observations related to product and business offerings, recent developments, and market strategies.

Key Benefits of Buying the Report

The report will help market leaders and new entrants with information on the closest approximations of the global NOC as a Service market's revenue numbers and subsegments. It will also help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to position their businesses better and plan suitable go-to-market strategies. Moreover, the report will provide insights for stakeholders to understand the market's pulse and provide them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.

The report provides insights into the following points:

• Analysis of key drivers (Cost savings, scalability, 24/7 monitoring, access to expertise, reduced operational overhead, improved service quality, enhanced network security, focus on core business activities, rapid deployment, flexibility in service offerings), restraints (Data privacy concerns, dependency on third-party providers, integration complexities, potential service disruptions, limited control over operations, communication barriers, lack of customization, security risks, vendor lock-in, regulatory compliance issues), opportunities (Integration of AI and automation, expansion into emerging markets, demand from SMEs, convergence of NOC and SOC services, growth in remote work environments, adoption of cloud-based solutions, partnerships with MSPs, development of specialized NOCaaS offerings, increasing reliance on IoT, advancements in cybersecurity), and challenges (Maintaining service quality, managing multivendor environments, ensuring data security, addressing skill shortages, adapting to technological advancements, handling large-scale deployments, meeting compliance requirements, managing customer expectations, ensuring service continuity, adapting to market dynamics) influencing the growth of the NOC as a Service market.
• Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights into upcoming technologies, research & development activities, and product & service launches in the NOC as a Service market
• Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets - analyzing the NOC as a Service market across various regions
• Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products & services, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the NOC as a Service market
• Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and service offerings of leading players such as Fujitsu (Japan), Park Place Technologies (US), Kaseya (US), Sify Technologies (India), INOC (US), iGlass Networks (US), Infrassist Technologies (India), EXTNOC (US), Mission Control NOC (Canada), Worksent (US), ConnectWise (US), CHR Managed Services (US), Structured (US), Science Soft (US), Microscan Communications (India), CBS (US), Quadrang Systems (India), Futurism Technologies (US), Tailwind Voice & Data (US), Emapta (Philippines), and GCX (US).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
• 1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
• 1.3 STUDY SCOPE
  • 1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION AND REGIONS COVERED
  • 1.3.2 INCLUSIONS & EXCLUSIONS
• 1.4 YEARS CONSIDERED
• 1.5 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
• 1.6 STAKEHOLDERS
• 1.7 SUMMARY OF CHANGES

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

• 2.1 RESEARCH DATA
  • 2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
  • 2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
    • 2.1.2.1 Primary interviews with experts
    • 2.1.2.2 Breakdown of primary profiles
    • 2.1.2.3 Key insights from industry experts
• 2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
  • 2.2.1 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
  • 2.2.2 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
  • 2.2.3 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET ESTIMATION: DEMAND-SIDE ANALYSIS
• 2.3 DATA TRIANGULATION
• 2.4 RISK ASSESSMENT
• 2.5 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
• 2.6 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS

• 4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR KEY PLAYERS IN NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET
• 4.2 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY SERVICE TYPE
• 4.3 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY SUPPORT MODEL
• 4.4 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY VERTICAL
• 4.5 NORTH AMERICA: NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY SERVICE TYPE AND SUPPORT MODEL

5 MARKET OVERVIEW AND INDUSTRY TRENDS

• 5.1 INTRODUCTION
• 5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
  • 5.2.1 DRIVERS
    • 5.2.1.1 Adoption of AI & AIOps for network automation and efficiency
    • 5.2.1.2 Growing demand for cybersecurity and 24/7 threat monitoring
    • 5.2.1.3 Expansion of cloud and hybrid infrastructure requiring scalable NOC solutions
  • 5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
    • 5.2.2.1 Regulatory and data sovereignty constraints in sensitive industries
    • 5.2.2.2 Integration of complexity with legacy and proprietary systems
    • 5.2.2.3 High cost of deployment and ROI concerns among SMBs
  • 5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
    • 5.2.3.1 Industry-specific and compliance-focused NOCaaS solutions for regulated sectors
    • 5.2.3.2 Growing potential for SMB and mid-market tailored service packages
    • 5.2.3.3 Rising adoption of 5G, Edge, and IoT networks requiring advanced NOC capabilities
  • 5.2.4 CHALLENGES
    • 5.2.4.1 Alert fatigue and noisy telemetry impacting incident management
    • 5.2.4.2 Tool fragmentation and data silos limiting unified visibility
    • 5.2.4.3 Shortage of skilled engineers for automation and AIOps integration
• 5.3 EVOLUTION OF NOC AS A SERVICE
• 5.4 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET: ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS/ MARKET MAP
• 5.5 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
  • 5.5.1 OIL & GAS CLIENT MODERNIZES REMOTE OPERATIONS WITH EXTERNETWORKS' MANAGED NOC MONITORING SERVICES
  • 5.5.2 ADTRAN STRENGTHENS ITS NOC SERVICE WITH INOC'S STRUCTURED ONBOARDING, TRAINING, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
  • 5.5.3 ADVANCED NETWORK PRODUCTS (ANP) ACCELERATES AUTOMATION AND SCALABILITY WITH CONNECTWISE RMM AND NOC SERVICES
• 5.6 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
• 5.7 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
  • 5.7.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
    • 5.7.1.1 European Data Protection Board (EDPB)
    • 5.7.1.2 OECD Privacy Framework (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)
    • 5.7.1.3 US Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
  • 5.7.2 KEY REGULATIONS
    • 5.7.2.1 North America
      • 5.7.2.1.1 US
    • 5.7.2.2 Europe
      • 5.7.2.2.1 UK
    • 5.7.2.3 Asia Pacific
      • 5.7.2.3.1 India
      • 5.7.2.3.2 Japan
    • 5.7.2.4 Middle East & Africa
      • 5.7.2.4.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.7.2.5 Latin America
      • 5.7.2.5.1 Brazil
• 5.8 PRICING ANALYSIS
  • 5.8.1 INDICATIVE PRICING ANALYSIS, BY SERVICE TYPE, 2024
• 5.9 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
  • 5.9.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 5.9.1.1 Network performance monitoring
    • 5.9.1.2 Log parsing and indexing
    • 5.9.1.3 Complex event processing (CEP)
  • 5.9.2 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES
    • 5.9.2.1 Machine learning (anomaly detection)
    • 5.9.2.2 Automated incident remediation
  • 5.9.3 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 5.9.3.1 Synthetic transaction monitoring
    • 5.9.3.2 Configuration automation
    • 5.9.3.3 Threat intelligence ingestion
• 5.10 PATENT ANALYSIS
• 5.11 PORTER'S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
  • 5.11.1 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
  • 5.11.2 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
  • 5.11.3 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
  • 5.11.4 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
  • 5.11.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
• 5.12 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
• 5.13 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
  • 5.13.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
  • 5.13.2 BUYING CRITERIA
• 5.14 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS
• 5.15 TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP FOR NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET
  • 5.15.1 SHORT-TERM ROADMAP (2023-2025)
  • 5.15.2 MID-TERM ROADMAP (2026-2028)
  • 5.15.3 LONG-TERM ROADMAP (2029-2030)
• 5.16 BEST PRACTICES IN NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET
  • 5.16.1 CODIFY RUNBOOKS AND SHIFT LEFT
  • 5.16.2 CORRELATE BEFORE YOU TICKET
  • 5.16.3 AUTOMATE FIRST-LINE DIAGNOSTICS AND SAFE REMEDIATION
  • 5.16.4 INTEGRATE ITSM BIDIRECTIONALLY AND REPORT WHAT MATTERS
  • 5.16.5 MAINTAIN ACCURATE TOPOLOGY/CMDB FOR IMPACT AND ESCALATION
• 5.17 INVESTMENT & FUNDING SCENARIO
• 5.18 IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI ON NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET
  • 5.18.1 TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
    • 5.18.1.1 Key use cases
  • 5.18.2 BEST PRACTICES
    • 5.18.2.1 BFSI industry
    • 5.18.2.2 IT & ITES industry
    • 5.18.2.3 Healthcare & life sciences industry
  • 5.18.3 CASE STUDIES OF GENERATIVE AI IMPLEMENTATION
    • 5.18.3.1 GenAI assisted correlation and RCA in a global financial services NOC
    • 5.18.3.2 Closed loop GenAI remediation for a cloud commerce portfolio
    • 5.18.3.3 Internet-aware experience protection with GenAI insights for a SaaS estate
  • 5.18.4 CLIENT READINESS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    • 5.18.4.1 Client A: Global financial services enterprise
    • 5.18.4.2 Client B: Regional e commerce portfolio
    • 5.18.4.3 Client C: Multinational SaaS provider
• 5.19 IMPACT OF 2025 US TARIFF - OVERVIEW
  • 5.19.1 INTRODUCTION
• 5.20 KEY TARIFF RATES
• 5.21 PRICE IMPACT ANALYSIS
• 5.22 IMPACT ON COUNTRY/REGION
  • 5.22.1 NORTH AMERICA
  • 5.22.2 EUROPE
  • 5.22.3 ASIA PACIFIC
• 5.23 IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

6 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY SERVICE TYPE

• 6.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 6.1.1 SERVICE TYPE: NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET DRIVERS
• 6.2 EVENT MONITORING & MANAGEMENT
  • 6.2.1 EFFECTIVE MONITORING SUPPRESSES NOISE, CORRELATES DEPENDENCIES, AND DELIVERS ENRICHED, ITSM-READY TICKETS
• 6.3 INCIDENT & PROBLEM MANAGEMENT
  • 6.3.1 GROWING ADOPTION OF AUTOMATED, ITIL-ALIGNED, AND INTEGRATED INCIDENT/PROBLEM MANAGEMENT TO DRIVE MARKET EXPANSION
• 6.4 SERVICE REPORTING & ANALYSIS
  • 6.4.1 DEMAND FOR REPORTING LINKING MTTR, CHANGES, AND PREVENTIVE WORK TO MEASURABLE OUTCOMES TO DRIVE MARKET
• 6.5 CAPACITY & CHANGE MANAGEMENT
  • 6.5.1 RISING FOCUS ON CAPACITY & CHANGE AS INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS TO DRIVE DEMAND FOR GOVERNED, MEASURABLE STABILITY IN OPERATIONS
• 6.6 OTHER SERVICE TYPES

7 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY SUPPORT MODEL

• 7.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 7.1.1 SUPPORT MODEL: NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET DRIVERS
• 7.2 ONSITE
  • 7.2.1 GROWING DEMAND FOR SECURE, LOW-LATENCY, HANDS-ON OPERATIONS TO DRIVE ADOPTION OF ONSITE MODELS
• 7.3 OFFSITE
  • 7.3.1 RISING NEED FOR SCALABLE, AUTOMATED, AND COST-EFFICIENT 24X7 MONITORING AND INCIDENT HANDLING TO DRIVE OFFSITE MODEL GROWTH
• 7.4 HYBRID
  • 7.4.1 INCREASING PREFERENCE FOR BALANCED MODELS COMBINING ONSITE PROXIMITY WITH CENTRALIZED SCALABILITY TO BOOST HYBRID ADOPTION

8 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY VERTICAL

• 8.1 INTRODUCTION
  • 8.1.1 VERTICALS: NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET DRIVERS
• 8.2 BANKING, FINANCIAL SERVICES, & INSURANCE (BFSI)
  • 8.2.1 BFSI DEMANDS ALWAYS-ON, AUDIT-READY NOC OPERATIONS MINIMIZING MTTR ACROSS COMPLEX, MULTI-PARTY NETWORKS WITH DISCIPLINED CHANGE GOVERNANCE
• 8.3 HEALTHCARE & LIFE SCIENCES
  • 8.3.1 HEALTHCARE REQUIRES CONTINUOUS, CLINICALLY AWARE NOC OPERATIONS PRESERVING UPTIME AND EVIDENCE FOR STRINGENT PRIVACY AND ACCREDITATION CONTROLS
• 8.4 GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC SECTOR
  • 8.4.1 PUBLIC-SECTOR BUYERS EXPECT NOCAAS WITH COMPLIANCE-FIRST MONITORING, AUDITABLE CHANGE/INCIDENT EVIDENCE, AND ALIGNMENT TO MODERNIZED FEDRAMP-STYLE CONTINUOUS MONITORING
• 8.5 TELECOM & CSVS
  • 8.5.1 TELECOM/CSV ADOPTION CENTERS ON GNOC-STYLE SCALE, FIELD COORDINATION, AND POLICY-DRIVEN SERVICE ASSURANCE SPANNING CARRIER WAN AND ENTERPRISE ACCESS
• 8.6 IT & ITES
  • 8.6.1 IT/ITES FAVORS SCALABLE, AUTOMATION-RICH OFFSITE NOCAAS TIGHTLY INTEGRATED WITH ITSM TO SUSTAIN UPTIME AND CUSTOMER COMMITMENTS
• 8.7 RETAIL & E-COMMERCE
  • 8.7.1 RETAIL/E-COMMERCE RELIES ON NOCAAS TO PREVENT AND RAPIDLY RESOLVE OUTAGES DURING PEAK TRADING, PAIRING OBSERVABILITY WITH STRICT CHANGE DISCIPLINE
• 8.8 ENERGY & UTILITIES
  • 8.8.1 ENERGY NOCAAS BLENDS REAL-TIME MONITORING OF DISTRIBUTED ASSETS WITH PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND FIELD COORDINATION TO MAINTAIN AVAILABILITY AND SAFETY
• 8.9 TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS
  • 8.9.1 TRANSPORTATION/LOGISTICS USES NOCAAS TO DETECT AND REMEDIATE EDGE ISSUES EARLY, COORDINATING FIELD ACTIONS TO AVOID COSTLY, CASCADING DISRUPTIONS
• 8.10 OTHER VERTICALS

9 NOC AS A SERVICE MARKET, BY REGION

• 9.1 INTRODUCTION
• 9.2 NORTH AMERICA
  • 9.2.1 NORTH AMERICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
  • 9.2.2 US
    • 9.2.2.1 Automation-first, compliance-driven NOCaaS adoption to drive demand
  • 9.2.3 CANADA
    • 9.2.3.1 Cloud growth, privacy needs, and hybrid work to drive NOCaaS adoption
• 9.3 EUROPE
  • 9.3.1 EUROPE: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
  • 9.3.2 GERMANY
    • 9.3.2.1 Strict data protection, industrial uptime, and EU-resident operations to drive NOCaaS growth
  • 9.3.3 UK
    • 9.3.3.1 Outcome-driven SLAs, disciplined governance, and executive-ready reporting to drive NOCaaS adoption
  • 9.3.4 FRANCE
    • 9.3.4.1 Sovereignty, compliance, and localized reporting to drive NOCaaS demand
  • 9.3.5 SPAIN
    • 9.3.5.1 Cost discipline, EU compliance, and distributed estates to drive NOCaaS market
  • 9.3.6 ITALY
    • 9.3.6.1 Legacy interconnects, modernization needs, and sector compliance to drive NOCaaS uptake
  • 9.3.7 REST OF EUROPE
• 9.4 ASIA PACIFIC
  • 9.4.1 ASIA PACIFIC: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
  • 9.4.2 CHINA
    • 9.4.2.1 Cloud growth, 5G expansion, and strict data rules make China largest NOCaaS market in Asia Pacific
  • 9.4.3 JAPAN
    • 9.4.3.1 High uptime demands in telecom, manufacturing, and finance to drive Japan's NOCaaS growth
  • 9.4.4 INDIA
    • 9.4.4.1 Cloud expansion, fintech growth, and telecom modernization to drive India's NOCaaS market
  • 9.4.5 SOUTH KOREA
    • 9.4.5.1 Dense 5G/edge networks and media/gaming demand push South Korea's NOCaaS growth
  • 9.4.6 AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND
    • 9.4.6.1 Banking, mining, and utilities spread across vast geographies to drive ANZ's NOCaaS adoption
  • 9.4.7 SINGAPORE
    • 9.4.7.1 Singapore's role as a financial and cloud hub to drive NOCaaS demand
  • 9.4.8 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
• 9.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
  • 9.5.1 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
  • 9.5.2 KSA
    • 9.5.2.1 Vision 2030 digitalization, cloud-first policies, and hyperscaler expansions to drive rapid NOCaaS growth in KSA
  • 9.5.3 UAE
    • 9.5.3.1 Cloud adoption, cyber resilience, and outcome-based managed services to drive UAE's NOCaaS demand
  • 9.5.4 SOUTH AFRICA
    • 9.5.4.1 Hybrid networks, data center hubs, and power reliability challenges to drive South Africa's NOCaaS adoption
  • 9.5.5 REST OF MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
• 9.6 LATIN AMERICA
  • 9.6.1 LATIN AMERICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
  • 9.6.2 BRAZIL
    • 9.6.2.1 Centralized NOC operations across multiple providers to drive demand
  • 9.6.3 MEXICO
    • 9.6.3.1 Integration of hybrid cloud and application monitoring with local field support to ensure continuous operational stability
  • 9.6.4 REST OF LATIN AMERICA

10 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 10.1 INTRODUCTION
• 10.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN, 2022-2025
• 10.3 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS, 2024
  • 10.3.1 MARKET RANKING ANALYSIS
• 10.4 REVENUE ANALYSIS, 2020-2024
• 10.5 BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARISON
• 10.6 COMPANY VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS
• 10.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
  • 10.7.1 STARS
  • 10.7.2 EMERGING LEADERS
  • 10.7.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
  • 10.7.4 PARTICIPANTS
  • 10.7.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
    • 10.7.5.1 Company footprint
    • 10.7.5.2 Region footprint
    • 10.7.5.3 Service type footprint
    • 10.7.5.4 Support model footprint
    • 10.7.5.5 Vertical footprint
• 10.8 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
  • 10.8.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
  • 10.8.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
  • 10.8.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
  • 10.8.4 STARTING BLOCKS
  • 10.8.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
    • 10.8.5.1 Detailed list of key startups/SMEs
    • 10.8.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of key startups/SMEs
• 10.9 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
  • 10.9.1 PRODUCT LAUNCHES
  • 10.9.2 DEALS

11 COMPANY PROFILES

• 11.1 KEY PLAYERS
  • 11.1.1 FUJITSU
    • 11.1.1.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.1.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.1.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.1.3.1 Product launches
      • 11.1.1.3.2 Deals
    • 11.1.1.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.1.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.2 KASEYA
    • 11.1.2.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.2.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.2.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.2.3.1 Product launches
    • 11.1.2.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.2.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.2.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.2.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.3 SIFY TECHNOLOGIES
    • 11.1.3.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.3.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.3.3 MnM view
      • 11.1.3.3.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.3.3.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.3.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.4 PARK PLACE TECHNOLOGIES
    • 11.1.4.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.4.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.4.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.4.3.1 Product launches
    • 11.1.4.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.4.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.4.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.4.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.5 CONNECTWISE (THOMA BRAVO)
    • 11.1.5.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.5.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.5.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.5.3.1 Deals
    • 11.1.5.4 MnM view
      • 11.1.5.4.1 Right to win
      • 11.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices
      • 11.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
  • 11.1.6 INOC (A GENNX360 PORTFOLIO COMPANY)
    • 11.1.6.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.6.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.6.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.6.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.7 IGLASS NETWORKS (20 SOUTH PARTNERS)
    • 11.1.7.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.7.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.7.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.7.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.8 TAILWIND VOICE & DATA
    • 11.1.8.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.8.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
  • 11.1.9 GCX (3I INFRASTRUCTURE PLC)
    • 11.1.9.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.9.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
    • 11.1.9.3 Recent developments
      • 11.1.9.3.1 Deals
  • 11.1.10 STRUCTURED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
    • 11.1.10.1 Business overview
    • 11.1.10.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
• 11.2 OTHER KEY PLAYERS
  • 11.2.1 INFRASSIST TECHNOLOGIES
  • 11.2.2 EXTNOC (EXTERNETWORKS)
  • 11.2.3 MISSION CONTROL NOC
  • 11.2.4 WORKSENT
  • 11.2.5 CHR MANAGED SERVICES
  • 11.2.6 SCIENCESOFT
  • 11.2.7 MICROSCAN COMMUNICATIONS
  • 11.2.8 CBS (COSMOS BUSINESS SYSTEMS)
  • 11.2.9 QUADRANG SYSTEMS
  • 11.2.10 FUTURISM TECHNOLOGIES
  • 11.2.11 EMAPTA
• 11.3 STARTUPS/SMES
  • 11.3.1 NETRIO
  • 11.3.2 QUANZA
  • 11.3.3 CLOUDSMARTZ
  • 11.3.4 HSC (HUGHES SYSTIQUE CORPORATION)
  • 11.3.5 MEDHA CLOUD
  • 11.3.6 TECEZE
  • 11.3.7 HEX64

12 ADJACENT AND RELATED MARKETS

• 12.1 INTRODUCTION
• 12.2 DATA CENTER NETWORKING MARKET
  • 12.2.1 MARKET DEFINITION
• 12.3 SOC AS A SERVICE (SOCAAS) MARKET
  • 12.3.1 MARKET DEFINITION

13 APPENDIX

• 13.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
• 13.2 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS' SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
• 13.3 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
• 13.4 RELATED REPORTS
• 13.5 AUTHOR DETAILS