항공우주 재료 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the aerospace materials market size is estimated at USD 60.38 billion in 2026, and is expected to reach USD 89.58 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 8.21% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Material Type (Structural and Non-Structural and Functional Materials), Aircraft Type (Commercial, Military, and More), Application System (Airframe Structures, Engine Components, Interior Systems, MRO and Aftermarket Replacement, and More), and Geography (Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, South America, and Middle East and Africa). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Value (USD).

Global Aerospace Materials Market Trends and Insights

Lightweight-Driven Surge in Structural Composites

Composite content surpassed 50% by structural weight in leading twin-aisle programs by 2025, unlocking a 20% reduction in operating weight that translates to 15% lower fuel consumption over a 20-year life cycle. Even cost-sensitive narrowbody programs are raising composite ratios, with China's C919 targeting 25% in its next block upgrade. Hexcel and Toray each announced multi-billion-dollar capacity additions to meet this trajectory, leveraging advanced fiber-placement lines that cut labor hours by 35%. Yet regional-jet and turboprop platforms remain predominantly aluminum, preserving a bifurcated material landscape through 2031. Supply-chain bottlenecks, notably in aerospace-grade polyacrylonitrile precursor, still temper the pace of substitution.

Rapid Expansion of Space-Launch Ecosystems

Annual orbital launches tripled between 2020 and 2025, with reusable-rocket providers such as SpaceX flying up to 15 cycles per first stage, a duty profile that demands alloys capable of surviving 1,650°C re-entry temperatures[2]. Blue Origin, ISRO, and emerging Middle Eastern programs have adopted aluminum-lithium, ceramic-matrix composites, and carbon-carbon nose-cone structures to squeeze payload margins. Material qualification cycles are compressing as launch operators iterate hardware every 18-24 months, catalyzing supplier investment in rapid-test infrastructure. Satellite constellations add volume by embedding high-frequency antenna substrates and radiation-hardened panels that raise material intensity per kilogram of spacecraft. Altogether, space-vehicle demand is expected to contribute over USD 15 billion in incremental opportunity for the aerospace materials market by 2031.

High Cost & Energy Intensity of Aerospace-Grade Carbon Fiber

Producing 1 kg of aerospace-grade carbon fiber consumes 286 MJ of energy and emits 31 kg of CO2e, quadrupling the carbon footprint of aluminum on a weight basis. Energy price spikes in 2024 raised precursor costs by more than 20%, squeezing margins for integrated producers such as SGL Carbon and Teijin. Small-tow fiber prices remain USD 30-40 per kilogram, twice the cost of industrial large-tow grades. Western firms are co-locating new lines near renewable energy sources in Morocco and Spain to mitigate volatility, while Chinese challengers undercut on price but still lack AS9100 certification for primary structures. Commercial-scale lignin-based precursors promise a 30% energy reduction, but commercialization sits three to five years out.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. OEM Carbon-Neutral Roadmaps Accelerating Material Substitution
2. Additive-Manufactured Certified Alloys Enabling Design Freedom
3. Strategic-Metal Supply-Chain Exposure

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Structural materials commanded 85.04% of 2025 revenue, reflecting their primacy in fuselage barrels, wing boxes, and empennage assemblies, where weight savings directly impact mission economics. Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers capture the lion's share, with Toray and Hexcel together supplying 60% of prepreg consumed in commercial programs. Aluminum-lithium alloys still hold a significant portion of spend inside the structural envelope, leveraging drop-in compatibility with legacy jigs to deliver 7-10% weight reductions without wholesale redesign. Titanium, despite representing just 5% of structural weight, absorbs 12% of value because of its USD 35-40 per kilogram price point. The aerospace materials market size for structural categories is projected to grow at an 8.42% CAGR, outstripping non-structural materials that serve coatings, sealants, and foams.

Non-structural and functional materials underpin mission-critical functions such as corrosion resistance, acoustic damping, and fuel-tank sealing. PPG's chromate-free primers gained traction as constraints tightened, lifting the firm's aerospace coatings revenue by 12% in 2025. Henkel's epoxy adhesives eliminated tens of thousands of fasteners per twin-aisle airframe, cutting assembly hours by 30%. Polyurethane and silicone sealants from 3M and Dow secure pressure boundaries across -55°C to 120°C thermal cycles. Collectively, functional segments defend margins above 20% because of stringent qualification barriers, even as structural materials bear price compression from OEM bargaining power.

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific dominated the aerospace materials market with a 53.65% share in 2025 and is on track for a 9.24% CAGR to 2031. COMAC delivered 39 C919s in 2025 and plans annual output of 150 units by 2028, each airplane absorbing 45 t of aluminum, 8 t of titanium, and 12 t of composites, mostly sourced from domestic suppliers. India logged 1,200 heavy maintenance events in 2025 as Air India and IndiGo repatriated work, lifting demand for structural adhesives and replacement panels. Japan exports USD 2.8 billion in carbon-fiber prepreg annually, with Toray's Nagoya site feeding 40% of global supply, while South Korea's KF-21 fighter requires 25% composites by weight. ASEAN members attracted USD 1.2 billion in aerostructures foreign direct investment between 2024 and 2025, broadening the regional supplier base.

North America is anchored by Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and SpaceX production hubs in the aerospace materials market. SpaceX alone consumed 25 t of aluminum-lithium and 8 t of composites per Falcon 9, flying 96 missions in 2024 and 72 more by mid-2025. Policy support via the CHIPS and Science Act earmarks USD 500 million for advanced material plants, aiming to rebalance import dependence for carbon fiber and titanium. Canada's Quebec cluster supplies 15% of global landing-gear forgings, while Mexico's aerospace exports hit USD 9.2 billion in 2025 as tier-2 machining capacity scaled in Queretaro and Chihuahua.

Europe is supported by Airbus's multi-site assembly network requiring constant feeds of composites, aluminum alloys, and titanium. Production delays in the A320neo narrowed regional volume 3% in 2025, but widebody throughput remained steady as A350 deliveries reached 80 units. Germany's Premium Aerotec, France's Safran, and the U.K.'s GKN Aerospace jointly processed more than 11,500 t of titanium and nickel superalloys in 2025. Post-Brexit customs friction added 5-8% to U.K. logistics costs, prompting suppliers to shift machining lines toward Poland and Czechia.

South America and Middle East & Africa combined for a smaller market share in the aerospace materials market but exhibit pockets of growth, notably in Embraer's E2 series and Saudi Arabia's localization push.

1. 3M
2. Alcoa Corporation
3. Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI)
4. Arkema
5. ATI
6. Axalta Coating Systems
7. BASF
8. Centre for Process Innovation Limited (CPI)
9. Constellium SE
10. CRS Holdings, LLC.
11. Diacel Corporation
12. DuPont
13. Evonik Industries AG
14. GKN Aerospace
15. Greiner AG
16. Henkel AG and Co. KGaA
17. Hentzen Coatings, Inc.
18. Hexcel Corporation
19. Howmet Aerospace
20. Isovolta AG
21. Jiangsu Hengshen Co.,Ltd
22. Kaiser Aluminum
23. Mankiewicz Gebr & Co.
24. Materion Corporation
25. Mitsubishi Chemical Group
26. PPG Industries, Inc.
27. Precision Castparts Corp. (PCC)
28. Reliance Industries Ltd.
29. Rogers Corporation
30. SGL Carbon
31. Solvay
32. Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.
33. Tata Steel
34. Teijin Limited
35. The Sherwin Williams Company
36. Timet (Titanium Metals Corp.)
37. Toray Industries Inc.
38. VSMPO-AVISMA

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Lightweight-driven surge in structural composites
  • 4.2.2 Rapid expansion of space-launch ecosystems
  • 4.2.3 OEM carbon-neutral roadmaps accelerating material substitution
  • 4.2.4 Additive-manufactured certified alloys enabling design freedom
  • 4.2.5 Circular-economy mandates for recyclable aerospace materials
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High cost and energy intensity of aerospace-grade carbon fiber
  • 4.3.2 Strategic-metal supply-chain exposure (e.g., Russian titanium)
  • 4.3.3 Lengthy certification and qualification cycles for new materials
• 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Porter's Five Forces
  • 4.5.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.5.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitute Products and Services
  • 4.5.5 Degree of Competition

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Material Type
  • 5.1.1 Structural Materials
    • 5.1.1.1 Composites
      • 5.1.1.1.1 Glass Fiber
      • 5.1.1.1.2 Carbon Fiber
      • 5.1.1.1.3 Aramid Fiber
      • 5.1.1.1.4 Other Composites (Ceramic-Matrix Composites, etc.)
    • 5.1.1.2 Plastics
    • 5.1.1.3 Alloys
      • 5.1.1.3.1 Aluminum and Al-Li Alloys
      • 5.1.1.3.2 Titanium Alloys
      • 5.1.1.3.3 Steel Alloys
      • 5.1.1.3.4 Superalloys (Ni, Co)
      • 5.1.1.3.5 Magnesium Alloys
      • 5.1.1.3.6 Other Alloys
  • 5.1.2 Non-Structural and Functional Materials
    • 5.1.2.1 Coatings
    • 5.1.2.2 Adhesives and Sealants
      • 5.1.2.2.1 Epoxy
      • 5.1.2.2.2 Polyurethane
      • 5.1.2.2.3 Silicone
      • 5.1.2.2.4 Other Adhesives and Sealants (Bio-based Adhesives, etc.)
    • 5.1.2.3 Foams
      • 5.1.2.3.1 Polyethylene
      • 5.1.2.3.2 Polyurethane
      • 5.1.2.3.3 Other Foams (Thermoplastic Foams, etc.)
    • 5.1.2.4 Seals
• 5.2 By Aircraft Type
  • 5.2.1 General and Commercial
  • 5.2.2 Military and Defense Aircraft
  • 5.2.3 Space Vehicles
• 5.3 By Application System
  • 5.3.1 Airframe Structures
  • 5.3.2 Engine Components
  • 5.3.3 Interior Systems
  • 5.3.4 MRO and Aftermarket Replacement
  • 5.3.5 Avionics and Electronics Housing
  • 5.3.6 Landing-Gear and Actuation Systems
• 5.4 By Geography
  • 5.4.1 Asia-Pacifc
    • 5.4.1.1 China
    • 5.4.1.2 India
    • 5.4.1.3 Japan
    • 5.4.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.1.5 ASEAN Countries
    • 5.4.1.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.4.2 North America
    • 5.4.2.1 United States
    • 5.4.2.2 Canada
    • 5.4.2.3 Mexico
  • 5.4.3 Europe
    • 5.4.3.1 Germany
    • 5.4.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.3.3 France
    • 5.4.3.4 Italy
    • 5.4.3.5 Russia
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.4.4 South America
    • 5.4.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.4.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share(%)/Ranking Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles {(includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)}
  • 6.4.1 3M
  • 6.4.2 Alcoa Corporation
  • 6.4.3 Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI)
  • 6.4.4 Arkema
  • 6.4.5 ATI
  • 6.4.6 Axalta Coating Systems
  • 6.4.7 BASF
  • 6.4.8 Centre for Process Innovation Limited (CPI)
  • 6.4.9 Constellium SE
  • 6.4.10 CRS Holdings, LLC.
  • 6.4.11 Diacel Corporation
  • 6.4.12 DuPont
  • 6.4.13 Evonik Industries AG
  • 6.4.14 GKN Aerospace
  • 6.4.15 Greiner AG
  • 6.4.16 Henkel AG and Co. KGaA
  • 6.4.17 Hentzen Coatings, Inc.
  • 6.4.18 Hexcel Corporation
  • 6.4.19 Howmet Aerospace
  • 6.4.20 Isovolta AG
  • 6.4.21 Jiangsu Hengshen Co.,Ltd
  • 6.4.22 Kaiser Aluminum
  • 6.4.23 Mankiewicz Gebr & Co.
  • 6.4.24 Materion Corporation
  • 6.4.25 Mitsubishi Chemical Group
  • 6.4.26 PPG Industries, Inc.
  • 6.4.27 Precision Castparts Corp. (PCC)
  • 6.4.28 Reliance Industries Ltd.
  • 6.4.29 Rogers Corporation
  • 6.4.30 SGL Carbon
  • 6.4.31 Solvay
  • 6.4.32 Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.
  • 6.4.33 Tata Steel
  • 6.4.34 Teijin Limited
  • 6.4.35 The Sherwin Williams Company
  • 6.4.36 Timet (Titanium Metals Corp.)
  • 6.4.37 Toray Industries Inc.
  • 6.4.38 VSMPO-AVISMA

7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

• 7.1 Use of Carbon Nanotubes and Nano-Additives with Epoxy Adhesives
• 7.2 Circular and Recyclable Composite Streams
• 7.3 Additive Manufacturing of Complex Metal/Composite Parts