미국의 실내 농업 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the united states indoor farming market size was valued at USD 5.02 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.53 billion in 2026 and reach USD 8.98 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 10.2% during the forecast period of 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Facility Type (Greenhouses, Indoor Vertical Farms, and Shipping-Container Farms), by Growing System (Hydroponics, Aeroponics, Aquaponics, Soil-Based, and Hybrid), and by Crop Type (Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs, Flowers and Ornamentals, Nursery and Propagation Crops). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

United States Indoor Farming Market Trends and Insights

Demand for Pesticide-Free Local Produce

The demand for clean-label produce is providing the indoor farming market with a stable, sustained base, moving beyond a temporary premium niche. Consumers increasingly seek products with clear information about their origin and handling processes before reaching retail and foodservice channels. A 2024 FAO assessment reported near-zero pesticide detections in hydroponically grown lettuce, tomatoes, and strawberries, reinforcing the appeal of indoor farming as a cleaner growing method for both retailers and consumers. These benefits are particularly significant in Western states, where stricter water policies and grocery procurement standards are being implemented. Furthermore, large retailers are transitioning local sourcing and traceability initiatives from pilot programs to mandatory supplier requirements, driving increased demand for indoor-grown produce. Participation in certified, traceable supply programs often requires enhanced monitoring, environmental controls, and automation, which, in turn, drives higher system investments across the indoor farming market.

Year-Round Supply Resilience Requirements

The indoor farming market is also gaining support from buyers who want fewer disruptions in fresh produce supply. Repeated recall events and weather-related disruptions in field agriculture pushed retailers and foodservice operators to examine production systems that can reduce exposure to soil and surface-water contamination risks. Indoor facilities offer a more controlled setting, which helps buyers manage food safety, timing, and consistency in ways open-field supply cannot always match. This shift matters because produce contracts are now judged not only on price but also on reliability throughout the year. Institutional buyers such as hospitals, universities, and correctional systems are becoming more active in local procurement models because stable supply matters as much as product quality in those settings. AmplifiedAg's September 2025 harvest at the first United States prison vertical farm in South Carolina showed that this model can supply around 21.7 metric tons of leafy greens annually, giving a practical example of year-round institutional demand. As more buyers treat resilient local sourcing as a procurement need, the market stands to benefit from longer and more stable purchase agreements.

High Capex and Energy Intensity

High upfront spending remains the single largest limit on the indoor farming sector because project economics must cover both complex infrastructure and energy-heavy operations. A 2025 study found that lighting, temperature control, and ventilation accounted for around 25% of total operating costs at large United States vertical farms, which confirms that utility spending is central rather than secondary. Artificial lighting accounts for the largest energy burden in enclosed vertical farms, consuming 60-85% of total energy. These cost layers are challenging because they sit on top of depreciation from structures, controls, irrigation systems, and other installed equipment. A 2025 Energy Journal study found that combined photovoltaic and battery storage could reduce excessive energy costs in controlled environment agriculture by 25%, but the added system integration costs still raise the starting capital requirement. High industrial electricity costs in markets such as California and New York deepen this challenge because those states are often among the most commercially attractive for local produce demand. Until efficiency gains outweigh those burdens across more crop types and facility models, cost intensity will remain a major brake on the indoor farming industry.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Water-Efficiency and Land-Productivity Gains
2. LED, Automation, and Climate-Control Advances
3. Skilled Labor and Agronomy-Automation Talent Shortages

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Greenhouses accounted for 67% of the United States indoor farming market share in 2025, leading the sector due to lower capital requirements and reduced energy dependence compared to fully enclosed farms. Meanwhile, indoor vertical farms are projected to be the fastest-growing segment, growing at a 12.5% CAGR through 2031, driven by denser layouts, automation, and more efficient use of urban space. Recent projects, such as AmHydro's Harvest Singularity facility in Florida, reflect a shift toward crop-stage-specific automation and more disciplined expansion strategies following the 2024-2025 industry shakeout.

Shipping-container farms remain a niche segment, mainly serving remote, institutional, and research applications. AmplifiedAg's USDA (United States Department of Agriculture)-funded container projects and correctional facility partnerships highlight their continued practical relevance despite limited contribution to overall market revenue growth. Greenhouses continue to provide the industry's stable revenue base due to their scalability, operational familiarity, and lower reliance on artificial lighting. The segment is also becoming more domestically focused. GrowSpan's 25,000-square-foot Venlo greenhouse expansion in Iowa and Prospiant's push toward United States-manufactured greenhouse solutions indicate a broader shift toward local sourcing, reduced import dependence, and stronger support for greenhouse retrofits and expansions across the United States.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Facility Type
  • Greenhouses
  • Indoor Vertical Farms
  • Shipping-container Farms
• By Growing System
  • Hydroponics
  • Aeroponics
  • Aquaponics
  • Soil-based and Hybrid Systems
• By Crop Type
  • Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs
    • Leafy Greens
    • Herbs
    • Tomatoes
    • Cucumbers
    • Peppers
    • Strawberries and Berries
    • Microgreens
  • Flowers and Ornamentals
  • Nursery and Propagation Crops

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

1. Mastronardi Produce Ltd. (Sunset)
2. Windset Farms
3. Cox Enterprises, LLC
4. Nature Fresh Farms
5. Little Leaf Farms
6. Village Farms International
7. Houwelings
8. BrightFarms
9. Gotham Greens
10. Local Bounti
11. Revol Greens
12. Pure Green Farms
13. Superior Fresh
14. Edible Garden AG
15. Soli Organic
16. Great Lakes Growers
17. Springworks Farm
18. AeroFarms
19. 80 Acres Farms
20. Oishii

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Demand for pesticide-free local produce
  • 4.2.2 Year-round supply resilience requirements
  • 4.2.3 Water-efficiency and land-productivity gains
  • 4.2.4 LED, automation, and climate-control advances
  • 4.2.5 Retail offtake contracts improving project financeability
  • 4.2.6 USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) grants and technical assistance for CEA buildouts
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High capex and energy intensity
  • 4.3.2 Skilled labor and agronomy-automation talent shortages
  • 4.3.3 Financing gap after vertical farming failures
  • 4.3.4 Zoning, permitting, and utility-interconnection delays
• 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.5 Technological Outlook
• 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.6.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.6.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

• 5.1 By Facility Type
  • 5.1.1 Greenhouses
  • 5.1.2 Indoor Vertical Farms
  • 5.1.3 Shipping-container Farms
• 5.2 By Growing System
  • 5.2.1 Hydroponics
  • 5.2.2 Aeroponics
  • 5.2.3 Aquaponics
  • 5.2.4 Soil-based and Hybrid Systems
• 5.3 By Crop Type
  • 5.3.1 Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs
    • 5.3.1.1 Leafy Greens
    • 5.3.1.2 Herbs
    • 5.3.1.3 Tomatoes
    • 5.3.1.4 Cucumbers
    • 5.3.1.5 Peppers
    • 5.3.1.6 Strawberries and Berries
    • 5.3.1.7 Microgreens
  • 5.3.2 Flowers and Ornamentals
  • 5.3.3 Nursery and Propagation Crops

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for Key Companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Mastronardi Produce Ltd. (Sunset)
  • 6.4.2 Windset Farms
  • 6.4.3 Cox Enterprises, LLC
  • 6.4.4 Nature Fresh Farms
  • 6.4.5 Little Leaf Farms
  • 6.4.6 Village Farms International
  • 6.4.7 Houwelings
  • 6.4.8 BrightFarms
  • 6.4.9 Gotham Greens
  • 6.4.10 Local Bounti
  • 6.4.11 Revol Greens
  • 6.4.12 Pure Green Farms
  • 6.4.13 Superior Fresh
  • 6.4.14 Edible Garden AG
  • 6.4.15 Soli Organic
  • 6.4.16 Great Lakes Growers
  • 6.4.17 Springworks Farm
  • 6.4.18 AeroFarms
  • 6.4.19 80 Acres Farms
  • 6.4.20 Oishii

7 Market Opportunities and Future Trends