양자 컴퓨팅 소프트웨어 플랫폼 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the quantum computing software platform market size is projected to expand from USD 0.96 billion in 2025 and USD 1.22 billion in 2026 to USD 3.97 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 26.62% between 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Platform Type (Development Kits, Algorithm Design Platforms, Quantum Emulators and Simulators, and More), Deployment Model (Cloud-Based, On-Premises, and Hybrid), Application (Simulation and Modeling, Machine Learning, and More), End User Industry (Healthcare and Life Sciences, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Quantum Computing Software Platform Market Trends and Insights

Enterprise Migration to Quantum-As-A-Service Development Stacks

Enterprise teams are moving quantum work onto managed development stacks because fragmented proof-of-concept environments are harder to govern, scale, and maintain over time in the quantum computing software platform market. This shift fits existing software governance models better, which makes it easier for large organizations to connect quantum experimentation with mainstream development and validation processes. IBM's Qiskit SDK v2.5 release in 2026 added custom compiler pipelines, a C API, and LightSabre routing improvements that reduced transpiration time on circuits of 100 or more qubits, which shows how enterprise tooling is becoming more practical for larger technical teams. As these managed stacks improve, switching costs move toward the software workflow and compiler layer rather than the underlying hardware layer in the quantum computing software platform market. That dynamic gives platform orchestrators more control over long-term customer relationships, especially when they become the default interface for hybrid quantum and classical development environments.

Government-Funded Quantum Software Procurement and National Programs

Direct public procurement remains one of the clearest demand signals for the quantum computing software platform market because it turns long-horizon research goals into funded software, benchmarking, and integration work. In May 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce signed letters of intent for USD 2.013 billion in CHIPS and Science Act incentives to 9 quantum companies, including IBM, Quantinuum, D-Wave, and Rigetti, which strengthens the hardware base that enterprise software depends on. The U.S. Department of Energy also renewed 5 National Quantum Information Science Research Centers with USD 625 million, including an Oak Ridge mandate tied to open-source quantum-classical workflow software, which supports middleware and orchestration demand. The White House Executive Order signed on June 22, 2026, created the QC-ADDS program, while the National Quantum Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2026 authorized USD 85 million per year for NIST quantum activities through 2030, reinforcing standards and performance assessment work that shapes commercial architecture choices. Japan's JHPC-quantum program, a 5-year JPY 10 billion program running through 2027, or USD 67 million at 2025 average exchange rates, is building the software foundation for quantum-HPC hybrid workflows and shows that procurement-led demand is not limited to North America.

Limited Fault-Tolerant Qubit Availability Slows Production-Grade Software Value Capture

The lack of commercially available fault-tolerant hardware still limits the range and depth of workloads that vendors can sell at scale in the quantum computing software platform market. Quantinuum's 98-qubit Helios processor, published in Nature in July 2026, marked a major technical step, but it still supports research and pilot-stage use more than full production enterprise deployment. Software developers also have to support very different hardware approaches, including superconducting, trapped-ion, neutral atom, photonic, and other architectures, which raises compiler and mitigation complexity across the quantum computing software platform market. IBM and Quantinuum have both pointed to 2029 as a meaningful target for scalable fault tolerance, which means the software layer will remain tied to hybrid and pre-production use cases through much of the forecast window. Until then, vendors must justify subscriptions through simulation quality, workflow integration, and benchmarking support rather than hardware-native quantum advantage.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Quantum Cloud Provider Ecosystem Expansion and SDK Integration
2. Rising Demand for Quantum Error Mitigation and Benchmarking Tools
3. High Talent Scarcity in Quantum Algorithms, Compilers, and Control Software

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Development Kits accounted for 39.23% of platform revenue in 2025, representing the largest slice of the quantum computing software platform market share by platform type. This leadership shows that enterprise spending is still concentrated in programming infrastructure, compiler access, and testing layers rather than higher-order orchestration. Buyers are still building foundational capability, which includes validating circuit compilation, checking emulator behavior, and establishing repeatable development workflows before wider production deployment in the quantum computing software platform market. IBM strengthened this layer through consecutive Qiskit releases in 2026 that expanded C API support and improved compiler functionality for larger circuits. That pattern supports a market structure where the first tool a developer learns often becomes the foundation for later integration choices across the quantum computing software platform market.

Middleware and orchestration was the fastest-growing segment, projected to record a 27.18% CAGR through 2031, which points to a gradual shift in value creation as hybrid workflows become more central. As hardware matures, enterprises will need stronger scheduling, routing, and job management layers to connect quantum processors with CPUs and GPUs in practical operating environments. Algorithm Design Platforms and Quantum Emulators and Simulators remain important because they help users validate logic and resource requirements before moving work onto live hardware queues. Quantum Control Software is still a smaller revenue layer, yet it is gaining importance as larger systems require tighter calibration, timing control, and error feedback loops. NVIDIA's CUDA-Q deployment within Japan's large-scale research infrastructure shows how simulation, orchestration, and control are moving closer together inside the quantum computing software platform market.

Cloud-Based deployment held 63.81% share in 2025, making it the leading access model in the quantum computing software platform market. This lead reflects the cost and complexity of hardware ownership, since most enterprises do not want to build or lease specialized systems just to begin testing quantum workflows. Cloud deployment also helps buyers compare different hardware modalities through software interfaces that are easier to adopt than direct infrastructure management. That approach speeds up evaluation cycles and makes developer participation less dependent on a physics-heavy internal team. The strength of cloud access is one reason the quantum computing software platform market is reaching users outside research-led institutions.

On-Premises deployment remains strategically relevant for government, defense, and certain research environments where security, latency, and system control carry more weight than broad accessibility. The Hybrid segment is the fastest-growing deployment path, projected to record a 29.52% CAGR through 2031, as many users now need tight integration between local classical infrastructure and remote quantum processing for iterative workloads. This becomes more important when round-trip latency can slow optimization loops or when regulated users want part of the workflow to remain inside controlled environments. Japan's ROQUO platform illustrates how hybrid design is becoming operational, because it links quantum systems with the Fugaku supercomputer in a working production environment. Regulatory pressure in areas such as data residency will keep non-public deployment models relevant even as cloud remains the main entry point for the quantum computing software platform market.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Platform Type
  • Development Kits
  • Algorithm Design Platforms
  • Quantum Emulators and Simulators
  • Middleware and Orchestration
  • Quantum Control Software
• By Deployment Model
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premises
  • Hybrid
• By Application
  • Optimization
  • Simulation and Modeling
  • Machine Learning
  • Cryptography and Cybersecurity
  • Drug Discovery and Materials Science
  • Supply Chain and Logistics Optimization
• By End User Industry
  • Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI)
  • Government and Defense
  • Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Automotive and Transportation
  • IT and Telecommunication
  • Chemical and Materials
  • Other End User Industries
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • United Kingdom
    • Germany
    • France
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Kenya
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America held 37.26% of the quantum computing software platform market share in 2025, which kept the region in the leading position by revenue. The region benefits from the concentration of major cloud players, specialist software vendors, national labs, and policy support mechanisms that fund standards and integration work in the quantum computing software platform market. The May 2026 CHIPS Act letters of intent, the June 2026 White House Executive Order on quantum innovation, and the National Quantum Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2026 all reinforced the United States as the most resource-intensive policy environment for this field. Canada supports regional depth through its research base and specialist company presence, while Mexico remains earlier in adoption and is more tied to cloud access than domestic platform creation.

Asia-Pacific is projected to expand at a 31.71% CAGR through 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing regional cluster in the quantum computing software platform market. Japan is a major driver because RIKEN launched the ROQUO quantum-HPC hybrid supercomputer in June 2026, connecting Quantinuum and IBM systems with the Fugaku supercomputer in an operational environment. Fujitsu and the University of Osaka also announced STAR Architecture ver. 3 in March 2026, improving computational accuracy by more than 10 times for molecular energy calculations on early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Fujitsu and RIKEN had already made Japan's 256-qubit superconducting quantum computer available to external users in 2025, which strengthens the region's software demand base for materials and scientific applications. Singapore is also building commercialization capacity through a dedicated accelerator backed by QAI Ventures, which shows that the quantum computing software platform market is broadening beyond the largest national programs in Asia.

Europe remains an important region in the quantum computing software platform market, with the United Kingdom and Germany standing out as research and commercialization hubs. The United Kingdom has strengthened its position in error correction software through Riverlane's Deltakit activity and its Deltaflow 2 integration with Oak Ridge's Frontier supercomputer. Germany-based ParityQC and Israel-based Classiq announced a partnership in July 2026 to integrate hardware optimization and higher-level software engineering, which reflects Europe's emphasis on interoperability rather than pure hardware concentration. South America and the Middle East and Africa remain earlier-stage regions, with adoption still centered on selective research and specialized financial or public-sector use cases rather than broad commercial scale.

1. IBM Corporation
2. Microsoft Corporation
3. Alphabet Inc.
4. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
5. D-Wave Quantum Inc.
6. Quantinuum Ltd.
7. QC Ware Corporation
8. Classiq Technologies Ltd.
9. Zapata Computing Holdings Inc.
10. 1QBit Information Technologies Inc.
11. Riverlane Ltd.
12. Q-CTRL Pty Ltd.
13. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Inc.
14. Pasqal S.A.
15. Aliro Technologies, Inc.
16. QuandCo B.V.
17. Horizon Quantum Computing Pte. Ltd.
18. Rigetti Computing, Inc.
19. IonQ, Inc.
20. Fujitsu Limited
21. Toshiba Corporation
22. Hitachi, Ltd.
23. NVIDIA Corporation

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Enterprise Migration to Quantum-As-A-Service Development Stacks
  • 4.2.2 Rising Demand for Quantum Error Mitigation and Benchmarking Tools
  • 4.2.3 Quantum Cloud Provider Ecosystem Expansion and SDK Integration
  • 4.2.4 Government-Funded Quantum Software Procurement and National Programs
  • 4.2.5 Fragmented Toolchains Creating Demand for Interoperability Layers
  • 4.2.6 Early Commercialization of Domain-Specific Quantum Applications in Finance, Chemistry, and Logistics
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Limited Fault-Tolerant Qubit Availability Slows Production-Grade Software Value Capture
  • 4.3.2 High Talent Scarcity in Quantum Algorithms, Compilers, and Control Software
  • 4.3.3 Vendor Lock-In Fears Around Proprietary Quantum SDKs and Closed Ecosystems
  • 4.3.4 Unclear ROI for Most Enterprise Workloads Beyond Pilot Use Cases
• 4.4 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.6 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.7 Technological Outlook
• 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.8.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.8.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.8.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
• 4.9 Strategic Moves Analysis
• 4.10 Patent and Intellectual Property Landscape

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Platform Type
  • 5.1.1 Development Kits
  • 5.1.2 Algorithm Design Platforms
  • 5.1.3 Quantum Emulators and Simulators
  • 5.1.4 Middleware and Orchestration
  • 5.1.5 Quantum Control Software
• 5.2 By Deployment Model
  • 5.2.1 Cloud-Based
  • 5.2.2 On-Premises
  • 5.2.3 Hybrid
• 5.3 By Application
  • 5.3.1 Optimization
  • 5.3.2 Simulation and Modeling
  • 5.3.3 Machine Learning
  • 5.3.4 Cryptography and Cybersecurity
  • 5.3.5 Drug Discovery and Materials Science
  • 5.3.6 Supply Chain and Logistics Optimization
• 5.4 By End User Industry
  • 5.4.1 Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI)
  • 5.4.2 Government and Defense
  • 5.4.3 Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • 5.4.4 Energy and Utilities
  • 5.4.5 Automotive and Transportation
  • 5.4.6 IT and Telecommunication
  • 5.4.7 Chemical and Materials
  • 5.4.8 Other End User Industries
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.2 Germany
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Kenya
      • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LandSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 IBM Corporation
  • 6.4.2 Microsoft Corporation
  • 6.4.3 Alphabet Inc.
  • 6.4.4 Amazon Web Services, Inc.
  • 6.4.5 D-Wave Quantum Inc.
  • 6.4.6 Quantinuum Ltd.
  • 6.4.7 QC Ware Corporation
  • 6.4.8 Classiq Technologies Ltd.
  • 6.4.9 Zapata Computing Holdings Inc.
  • 6.4.10 1QBit Information Technologies Inc.
  • 6.4.11 Riverlane Ltd.
  • 6.4.12 Q-CTRL Pty Ltd.
  • 6.4.13 Xanadu Quantum Technologies Inc.
  • 6.4.14 Pasqal S.A.
  • 6.4.15 Aliro Technologies, Inc.
  • 6.4.16 QuandCo B.V.
  • 6.4.17 Horizon Quantum Computing Pte. Ltd.
  • 6.4.18 Rigetti Computing, Inc.
  • 6.4.19 IonQ, Inc.
  • 6.4.20 Fujitsu Limited
  • 6.4.21 Toshiba Corporation
  • 6.4.22 Hitachi, Ltd.
  • 6.4.23 NVIDIA Corporation

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES and FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
• 7.2 Adjacent Ecosystem Opportunities
• 7.3 Adoption Barriers and Commercialization Pathways