활성탄을 이용한 수은 제거 시장 보고서 : 동향, 예측 및 경쟁 분석(-2035년)

Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

The future of the global mercury removal with activated carbon market looks promising with opportunities in the flue gas and liquefied natural gas markets. The global mercury removal with activated carbon market is expected to reach an estimated $2.5 billion by 2035 from $1.8 billion in 2027 with a CAGR of 4.3% from 2027 to 2035. The major drivers for this market are the increasing environmental regulations, the rising demand for efficient mercury removal technologies, and the growing awareness of mercury pollution's health risks.

• Lucintel forecasts that, within the type category, granular is expected to witness the highest growth over the forecast period due to more efficient industrial application.
• Within the application category, flue gas is expected to witness higher growth over the forecast period due to the growing demand for cleaner industrial processes.
• In terms of regions, APAC is expected to witness the highest growth over the forecast period due to the increasing environmental regulations in this region.

Emerging Trends in Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

The market for mercury removal using activated carbon shifts away from compliance-based coal financing towards other industrial emission control areas. From 2025 to 2027, the market for installed capacities will be impacted by more stringent permitting and the closure of coal plants, modernization of waste incineration facilities, and higher demand for improved sorbents. Lucintel believes that in the foreseeable future, the field differentiators will be sorbents that reduce the volume of emissions and improved margin of regeneration.

• Sustainability: In 2025, most buyers will favour activated carbon derived from either wood or coconut shell sources due to reduced carbon footprint. Customers will carefully evaluate the end-of-life management of the sorbent. The use of recovered carbon sorbent programs will begin, and most operators will weigh the total environmental cost instead of mercury removal.
• Process Automation: From 2025 to 2027, most installations will use real-time continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) with integrated automated controls for sorbent-feed systems. Automation will be employed due to the increasingly tighter regulation of mercury emissions.
• Specialized Sorbents: In 2026, most sorbent suppliers will develop activated carbon with either chemical substitutes or bromine for use on flue gas stream systems with variable coal or waste fuels. The use of these premium grades of sorbents will increase over the next 3 to 5 years.
• Industrial Diversification: The market diversifies beyond coal to cement manufacturing, non-ferrous metal industries, hazardous waste and municipal waste incineration, and more than 150 countries that have signed the Minamata Convention.
• Regional Supply Resilience: By 2025, procurement teams will maintain extra inventory post volatility disruptions and freight issues. Price variability of activated carbon is still correlated to coconut shell supply. Regional sourcing will influence contracts through 2030 since outage risks will be greater than savings from minimal price increases of raw materials.

The mercury control market will be a niche market for the next five years, but will have a larger customer base during this time. During this period, the strongest market positions will go to suppliers who provide consistent carbon quality, dosing support and monitoring, and have safe disposal. Coal exposure will continue to decline, but there will be other industrial applications to offset this decline. The cost per unit of mercury removed will dictate the preference of buyers.

Recent Developments in the Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

The restriction on mercury emissions will drive growth in the market for mercury removal using activated carbon between 2025 and 2027 as utility environmental regulations for mercury emissions and waste-to-energy plants upgrading their filtration systems create greater demand for activated carbon, and suppliers expand the activated carbon they treat. Lucintel believes regulation, retrofit economics, and sorbent performance are the primary drivers for market growth. Jet Energy believes the market will shift toward more innovative products that reduce pulverized sorbent injection and still comply with regulations.

• Regulatory Tightening: The EU Industrial Emissions Directive was implemented in August 2024 and continues through 2026. This will result in mercury capture technology, along with the demand for activated carbon, which will be required by utility plants.
• Utility Retrofits: Mercury control investments by coal generators continue to be made by utility environmental regulations in the U.S., even though coal generators are scheduled to be retired. EPA's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards mandate the replacement of more than 200 utility plants' sorbent injection systems, creating a market for mercury control technology through 2027.
• Product Innovation: Suppliers are developing activated carbons containing bromine and ChemTreat chemicals for difficult flue gas conditions. A product reducing pulverized injected sorbent was launched in March 2025 and is targeting improved economics for waste-to-energy facilities and small boilers.
• Waste-to-energy Expansion: Increased demand for mercury capture media is occurring in waste-to-energy sectors outside traditional power generation. In 2025 Germany had operating waste incineration plants numbering around 100, providing a stable customer base for suppliers where compliance of emissions is mandatory.
• Supply-chain Investment: Activated carbon producers are improving feedstock flexibility and expanding regional capacity. A planned 2025 expansion with 10,000 metric tons of capacity reduction will decrease delivery risk and support customized grades as procurement shifts to secure multi-source supply.

The market will grow in the long term via multiple avenues like waste-to-energy, cement, non-ferrous metals, and hazardous waste treatment. Long-term contracts will be awarded to companies who have validated their removal efficiency, logistics, and regeneration. Coal pricing is currently sensitive to removal, but there is sustained long-term demand from regulations to control mercury emissions.

Strategic Growth Opportunities in the Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

During the period 2024 to 2026 availability of commercial space will be increased due to tighter mercury limits, retirements of coal-fired Generating Units, incorporation of controls on waste incineration, and/or due to the increasing demand for industrial water treatment. In this context, Lucintel associates the available commercial space with replacement demands, engineered media, and service contracts. Market players, therefore, stand to benefit by offering adsorption media along with the service of continuous performance monitoring.

• Expansion of Waste-to-energy: With increasing capacity of municipal waste, high temperature treatment of flue gas will need mercury specific activated carbon. The EU is targeting 60% recycling of municipal solid waste by 2030 (January 2025). This opportunity will grow with cities replacing land filling with controlled thermal treatment.
• Industrial Water Treatment: Activated carbon systems can provide service to chlor-alkali, mining, and clean-up site industries that are treating water containing mercury. The U.S. EPA has retained a health advisory of 0.2 micrograms per liter for drinking water (May 2025). Demand will increase with the growing number of industry permits and the shift to continuous treatment for remediation.
• Premium Impregnated Media: Brominated and Sulfur treated activated carbons will command a premium when there is a need to meet outlet mercury limit and when activated carbon of routine grade will not meet the requirement. A benchmark report for the year 2025 has indicated that activated carbon can remove 99% of mercury under optimized conditions (March 2025). Performance based procurement will favor certified activated carbon media as opposed to the lowest priced carbon.
• Digital Monitoring Services: Market players can offer a combination of carbon replacement and mercury sensors, offer remote compliance, and report monitoring services. A 2025 European pilot project is continuous monitoring of 12 industrial exhaust outlets (June 2025). Long term contracts for monitoring services will improve retention and certainty regarding the timing of breakthrough.
• Asia-Pacific: Local coal generation and artisanal mining means continued demand for mobile adsorption units, and spent carbon management. Indonesia's 2025 mercury action plan cites 34 of 34 provinces (February 2025). For the next 5 years, local partnerships and regional regeneration will determine market access.

Those customers who buy verified removal outcomes will gain market advantage versus the sales of tonnes of carbon alone. While regulation opens the market, operating data along with reliable replacement logistics and safe treatment of spent-media will control the outcome of the contracts. Those companies which offer specialized activated carbon coupled with field engineering, monitoring and management software, and lifecycle performance will be able to capture the market. This, in turn will decrease the risk for the end user of compliance. With the expanding controls on mercury beyond power generation, this market should also capture the waste, mining, water and remediation opportunity.

Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market Drivers and Challenges

The mercury removal by activated carbon market is influenced by a range of environmental, economic, regulatory, and technological factors. The dynamics created by a combination of increasing manufacturing, enforcement of emission norms, better performance and more sustainable sorbents as well as increasing demand evolve the market. These dynamics however, are challenged by variations in cost of raw-materials, operational constraints, disposal challenges and by alternative technologies built to address the same problem. The next five years will see significant investment motivated by the need to comply as well as the need to improve the processes.

The factors responsible for driving this market include:

• Regulation of Industrial Emissions: The mercury removal technology is increasingly sought after in power plants, waste and wood incineration units, cement factories as well as in metals refining and processing industries due to the increasingly stringent air quality legislation. Activated carbon continues to enjoy advantage due to the low cost and the ease of its retrofitting to an existing flue gas treatment system. The Industrial Emissions Directive of the EU will continue to influence member states through 2026. It is expected to influence demand in the next 3 to 5 years as industries invest in communication system upgrades and mercury control systems.
• Regulation of Emissions: The regulated authorities are strengthening the monitoring and reporting of mercury emissions coupled with more stringent regulation on mercury emissions. The Minamata Convention, which has been ratified by more than 140 countries, is driving the reduction of industrial and artisanal mercury releases. In 2025, there was an increase in the compliance reviews and emissions testing by most of the regulated facilities. More stringent enforcement of mercury emission regulations will create a consistent need for activated carbon, accompanying equipment, and monitoring as well as replacements of systems in the regions with aging industrial equipment.
• Product Innovation: Manufacturers innovate activated carbon by using halogenation, chemical impregnation, controlled pore structures, and blended sorbents that efficiently remove mercury under complicated flue-gas conditions. In 2025, suppliers focused more on selling sorbents that could tolerate more sulfur, chlorine, and moisture. The effectiveness still depends on the process. An innovation focus will extend the market to customers within the next three to five years by decreasing dosages, enhancing reliability of removal, and enabling installation in sites that have faced inconsistent results with conventional carbon.
• Industrialization and Energy Demand: Increased demand for electricity and metal production, accompanied by more waste generation, will create a higher demand for mercury-control systems. Increased global electricity demand by almost 4% in 2024 will create demand for more generation with less emissions and lower mercury emissions in 2025. Although renewable energy is increasing, thermal and industrial operations still dominate many markets. Demand will remain constant because owners and operators of new and upgraded facilities will include mercury-control equipment in their system design to ensure compliance at lower cost.
• Cost and Operational Efficiency: Activated carbon systems can offer a balance between ease of installation and improvement in capture efficiency and flexibility with existing equipment. Facility operators can adjust sorbent injection in response to variations in fuel quality, mercury concentration, and applicable regulations. This focus will influence the next three to five years of adoption since customers will focus on the cost of treatment and performance that gives certainty in compliance with lower downtime and the least required upgrading of the emissions-control system.

The challenges facing this market include:

• Prices of Raw Materials: Activated carbon production utilizes coal, coconut shells, wood, and other carbonaceous feedstocks. Prices of these materials fluctuate along with the availability of these feedstocks, as do the costs of energy, transport, and activation. During 2025, logistics and market uncertainty caused industrial consumables budgets to be even more uncertain. price volatility makes customers reluctant to buy and causes customers to negotiate longer contracts or leads them to evaluate alternative sorbents. During the next three to five years, margin protection and reliable supply will be the advantages of manufacturers that produce activated carbon in several regions and have flexible feedstocks.
• Disposal of Spent Carbon: Mercury-loaded activated carbon is hazardous and requires special handling while it is stored and transported. The disposed material may remain hazardous. Disposal methods vary by location, and treatment or stabilization may increase costs. During 2025, the more stringent documentation of hazardous waste in several regions created a more challenging compliance environment for industrial users. This will affect the market positively in that it will likely create more demand for technology that allows for safer, stabilized, and regenerated mercury. This will, however, discourage adoption in regions that have poor infrastructure for the disposal of spent carbon.
• Alternative Technologies and Process Constraints: High sulfur and moisture content and the presence of competing pollutants and unfavorable gas temperatures affect the performance of activated carbon. In some cases, chemical scrubbers, selenium-based sorbents, catalytic systems, and improved combustion controls could potentially compete with activated carbon systems. In 2026, many facilities focused on the comparison of integrated emissions-control technologies rather than the selection of mercury-capture systems. This will drive the market for the next three to five years, as it creates a need for carbon suppliers to provide site-specific performance, lifecycle value, and lower total treatment costs to compete.

The development of activated carbon for mercury removal will be closely associated with compliance with environmental regulations, industry growth, technological advancements, and more efficient, cost-effective approaches to emissions control. The most encouraging of these may be increased enforcement and greater investment in pollution control by governments. Product innovations and automation of dosing systems will also be important. Market constraints may include volatile sources for raw materials, the management of spent carbon, and the presence of competing technologies. Performance, sustainability of carbon supplies, and integrated systems of carbon supply and monitoring will define the winning position in this market. The market should grow steadily due to the efforts industries make to reduce mercury emissions, but this growth will be uneven due to regulations changes and the quality of infrastructure and the concerns of industries regarding the total cost of the effort.

List of Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market Companies

Companies in the market compete on the basis of product quality offered. Major players in this market focus on expanding their manufacturing facilities, R&D investments, infrastructural development, and leverage integration opportunities across the value chain. Through these strategies mercury removal with activated carbon market companies cater increasing demand, ensure competitive effectiveness, develop innovative products & technologies, reduce production costs, and expand their customer base. Some of the mercury removal with activated carbon market companies profiled in this report include-

• Calgon Carbon
• Jacobi
• Norit
• Eco Friend Carbon
• Ningxia Huahui Environmental Protection Technology
• Qizhong Chemical
• Nanjing Zhengsen Environmental Protection Technology

Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Segment

The study includes a forecast for the global mercury removal with activated carbon market by type, application, and region.

Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Type [Value ($B) from 2019 to 2035]:

• Granular
• Powder
• Pellet

Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Application [Value ($B) from 2019 to 2035]:

• Flue Gas
• Liquefied Natural Gas
• Others

Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Region [Value ($B) from 2019 to 2035]:

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• The Rest of the World

Country Wise Outlook for the Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

Mercury removal through activated carbon is being influenced by emissions controls, coal-fired plant retirements, and investments in sorbent injection and filtration systems. During the years 2025-2027, the schedules for implementation of air-quality rules will determine procurement timing. In the meantime, Utilities are beginning to specify verified mercury-capture performance. According to the latest market analysis from Lucintel, regional regulations are the key drivers for technology adoption.

• United States: The EPA's Mercury and Air Toxics stand requires controls on mercury emissions from coal and oil-fired power generation. The 2025 reviews of the respective rules have created an uncertain environment surrounding their eventual implementation. Activated carbon injection, fabric filters, and other related equipment will be used to meet the monitoring and compliance requirements of the rule. Utilities with over 200 million customers will create a demand for replacement during the period 2025-2027. This is significant as the final decisions regarding compliance will determine if capital expenditures favor retrofit sorbent systems or new filtration installations.
• China: Action plans for industrial pollution control for 2025-2027 will establish an ongoing focus in China on ultra-low-emission retrofit projects for power, cement and steel plants. The coal-fired generating capacity in China exceeded 1,400 GW by 2025, thus creating a large base for the installation of mercury control equipment. Even low levels of equipment retrofits for a large industrial facility can create a significant incremental demand for activated carbon within the region.
• Germany: Germany will adopt the Revision of the EU Industrial Emissions Directive in April 2024. Germany will issue permits and ensure compliance with the requirements set by the directive between 2024 and 2027. The directive will apply to large combustion and waste plants and add the obligation to control pollution and install monitoring systems. Operators of the plants will most likely choose high-efficiency sorbents and integrated filtration for upgrading or converting the plants.
• India: India's Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has not imposed any further restrictions on the mercury concentration in waste streams of coal power plants. Different older/younger plants will have different deadlines for compliance. Environmental control investments by NTPC on its 80-GW power generation capacity continued in 2025. This choice will require power generators to undertake multiple consecutive upgrades for sorbent injection and control systems over a period of years.
• Japan: The Modernization of the Japanese Coal power fleet will focus on the ammonia-coal joint projects and the upgrading of the coal power plants to meet efficiency standards. The stringent emission standards under the Air Pollution Control Act are expected to remain.

Features of the Global Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

• Market Size Estimates: mercury removal with activated carbon market size estimation in terms of value ($B).
• Trend and Forecast Analysis: Market trends (2019 to 2026) and forecast (2027 to 2035) by various segments and regions.
• Segmentation Analysis: mercury removal with activated carbon market size by type, application, and region in terms of value ($B).
• Regional Analysis: mercury removal with activated carbon market breakdown by North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Rest of the World.
• Growth Opportunities: Analysis of growth opportunities in different type, application, and regions for the mercury removal with activated carbon market.
• Strategic Analysis: This includes M&A, new product development, and competitive landscape of the mercury removal with activated carbon market.

Analysis of competitive intensity of the industry based on Porter's Five Forces model.

If you are looking to expand your business in this or adjacent markets, then contact us. We have done hundreds of strategic consulting projects in market entry, opportunity screening, due diligence, supply chain analysis, M & A, and more.

This report answers following 11 key questions:

• Q.1. What are some of the most promising, high-growth opportunities for the mercury removal with activated carbon market by type (granular, powder, and pellet), application (flue gas, liquefied natural gas, and others), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World)?
• Q.2. Which segments will grow at a faster pace and why?
• Q.3. Which region will grow at a faster pace and why?
• Q.4. What are the key factors affecting market dynamics? What are the key challenges and business risks in this market?
• Q.5. What are the business risks and competitive threats in this market?
• Q.6. What are the emerging trends in this market and the reasons behind them?
• Q.7. What are some of the changing demands of customers in the market?
• Q.8. What are the new developments in the market? Which companies are leading these developments?
• Q.9. Who are the major players in this market? What strategic initiatives are key players pursuing for business growth?
• Q.10. What are some of the competing products in this market and how big of a threat do they pose for loss of market share by material or product substitution?
• Q.11. What M&A activity has occurred in the last 8 years and what has its impact been on the industry?

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

2. Market Overview

• 2.1 Background and Classifications
• 2.2 Supply Chain

3. Market Trends & Forecast Analysis

• 3.2 Industry Drivers and Challenges
• 3.3 PESTLE Analysis
• 3.4 Patent Analysis
• 3.5 Regulatory Environment

4. Global Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Type

• 4.1 Overview
• 4.2 Attractiveness Analysis by Type
• 4.3 Granular: Trends and Forecast (2019-2035)
• 4.4 Powder: Trends and Forecast (2019-2035)
• 4.5 Pellet: Trends and Forecast (2019-2035)

5. Global Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Application

• 5.1 Overview
• 5.2 Attractiveness Analysis by Application
• 5.3 Flue Gas: Trends and Forecast (2019-2035)
• 5.4 Liquefied Natural Gas: Trends and Forecast (2019-2035)
• 5.5 Others: Trends and Forecast (2019-2035)

6. Regional Analysis

• 6.1 Overview
• 6.2 Global Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Region

7. North American Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

• 7.1 Overview
• 7.2 North American Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Type
• 7.3 North American Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Application
• 7.4 United States Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 7.5 Mexican Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 7.6 Canadian Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

8. European Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

• 8.1 Overview
• 8.2 European Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Type
• 8.3 European Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Application
• 8.4 German Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 8.5 French Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 8.6 Spanish Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 8.7 Italian Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 8.8 United Kingdom Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

9. APAC Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

• 9.1 Overview
• 9.2 APAC Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Type
• 9.3 APAC Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Application
• 9.4 Japanese Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 9.5 Indian Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 9.6 Chinese Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 9.7 South Korean Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 9.8 Indonesian Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

10. ROW Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

• 10.1 Overview
• 10.2 ROW Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Type
• 10.3 ROW Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market by Application
• 10.4 Middle Eastern Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 10.5 South American Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 10.6 African Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market

11. Competitor Analysis

• 11.1 Product Portfolio Analysis
• 11.2 Operational Integration
• 11.3 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • Competitive Rivalry
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • Threat of Substitutes
  • Threat of New Entrants
• 11.4 Market Share Analysis

12. Opportunities & Strategic Analysis

• 12.1 Value Chain Analysis
• 12.2 Growth Opportunity Analysis
  • 12.2.1 Growth Opportunities by Type
  • 12.2.2 Growth Opportunities by Application
• 12.3 Emerging Trends in the Global Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Market
• 12.4 Strategic Analysis
  • 12.4.1 New Product Development
  • 12.4.2 Certification and Licensing
  • 12.4.3 Mergers, Acquisitions, Agreements, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures

13. Company Profiles of the Leading Players Across the Value Chain

• 13.1 Competitive Analysis
• 13.2 Calgon Carbon
  • Company Overview
  • Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Business Overview
  • New Product Development
  • Merger, Acquisition, and Collaboration
  • Certification and Licensing
• 13.3 Jacobi
  • Company Overview
  • Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Business Overview
  • New Product Development
  • Merger, Acquisition, and Collaboration
  • Certification and Licensing
• 13.4 Norit
  • Company Overview
  • Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Business Overview
  • New Product Development
  • Merger, Acquisition, and Collaboration
  • Certification and Licensing
• 13.5 Eco Friend Carbon
  • Company Overview
  • Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Business Overview
  • New Product Development
  • Merger, Acquisition, and Collaboration
  • Certification and Licensing
• 13.6 Ningxia Huahui Environmental Protection Technology
  • Company Overview
  • Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Business Overview
  • New Product Development
  • Merger, Acquisition, and Collaboration
  • Certification and Licensing
• 13.7 Qizhong Chemical
  • Company Overview
  • Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Business Overview
  • New Product Development
  • Merger, Acquisition, and Collaboration
  • Certification and Licensing
• 13.8 Nanjing Zhengsen Environmental Protection Technology
  • Company Overview
  • Mercury Removal with Activated Carbon Business Overview
  • New Product Development
  • Merger, Acquisition, and Collaboration
  • Certification and Licensing

14. Appendix

• 14.1 List of Figures
• 14.2 List of Tables
• 14.3 Research Methodology
• 14.4 Disclaimer
• 14.5 Copyright
• 14.6 Abbreviations and Technical Units
• 14.7 About Us
• 14.8 Contact Us