AI 탄소발자국 관리 소프트웨어 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the AI carbon footprint management software market size was valued at USD 1.82 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 5.56 billion by 2031 at a CAGR of 20.70% from 2026 to 2031.

This report is Segmented by Component (Software, and Services), Deployment Mode (Cloud-Based, On-Premise, and Hybrid), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), End-Use Industry (IT and Telecom, BFSI, Industrial Manufacturing, Energy and Utilities, Retail and E-Commerce, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global AI Carbon Footprint Management Software Market Trends and Insights

Rising Regulatory Pressure For Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 Disclosure

Mandatory disclosure rules now cover a larger share of the corporate reporting base than in earlier phases of emissions reporting, providing direct growth support for the AI carbon footprint management software market. The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive required the first wave of companies, around 500 large public-interest entities with more than 500 employees, to publish ESRS-compliant sustainability statements in 2025 for fiscal 2024 data. California's Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act requires Scope 1 and Scope 2 reporting from August 10, 2026, for entities with more than USD 1 billion in annual revenue that do business in the state, and Scope 3 reporting begins in 2027. The practical change in this cycle is that disclosure is increasingly tied to traceability and external review rather than broad estimation, which raises the value of systems that preserve source records, workflow controls, and reporting consistency. That shift makes software adoption less discretionary because companies now need outputs that can withstand regulatory scrutiny and assurance processes, not just internal sustainability reviews.

Corporate Net-Zero Commitments and Science Based Targets Adoption

Corporate decarbonization commitments deepened further in 2025, reinforcing structural demand in the AI carbon footprint management software market. The Science Based Targets initiative reported 9,764 companies with validated near-term targets by the end of 2025, up 40% from 2024, while validated net-zero targets rose 61% to 2,325 companies. The same tracker showed that the total number of companies with validated targets or active commitments reached 12,353, suggesting a much larger future reporting and monitoring base than current deployments alone indicate. Asia posted the fastest growth in validated companies, and China recorded 92% growth in validated targets, widening the addressable demand pool in markets previously viewed as less mature for carbon software procurement. SBTi's proposed revision of the Corporate Net-Zero Standard also points toward stricter Scope 3 coverage, encouraging companies to invest earlier in primary data capture and higher-fidelity inventory systems rather than relying on broad averages that may no longer be acceptable.

High Data Quality Gaps Across Scope 3 Supply Chains

Scope 3 remains the most difficult part of a corporate inventory because the underlying data often sits outside direct operational control and flows through large supplier networks with varying reporting maturity. Normative launched Carbon Inventory Managed Services in February 2026 to address what it described as the last-mile problem, and its GHG Protocol-certified advisors logged more than 1,000 client-support hours in the first 6 weeks of 2026 alone. EcoVadis expanded its Carbon Data Network in April 2026 by adding Carbmee, whose Environmental Intelligence System identifies emissions hotspots at the SKU level and links decarbonization actions to financial return metrics, demonstrating the level of granularity buyers now need to improve supplier-level reporting. Even with better platform tools, supplier data collection remains labor-intensive and methodologically uneven, which slows the path from software purchase to full compliance. This restraint matters most in multi-tier supply chains because software can centralize data but cannot immediately address weak primary inputs from every supplier node.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. AI-Powered Automation Reducing Manual Carbon Data Workflows
2. Enterprise Demand for Audit-Ready Sustainability Reporting
3. High Implementation and Integration Costs For Mid-Market Buyers

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Software accounted for 70.34% of the AI carbon footprint management software market in 2025, indicating that buyers still prefer scalable platforms that centralize Scope 1, 2, and 3 data in a single operating environment. That preference is strongest in larger deployments where companies need multi-entity workflows, standardized methodologies, and consistent reporting structures across business units and jurisdictions. Workiva expanded its platform in May 2026 with CDP 2026 questionnaire support and AI-powered, simplified ESRS intelligence, reflecting how vendors are adding compliance-specific functionality directly into product layers rather than treating it as separate advisory work. SAP's Green Ledger moved in the same direction by bringing transaction-level carbon accounting into S/4HANA Cloud, which supports the broader shift toward carbon-financial integration within systems that finance teams already trust. As carbon data becomes more closely tied to financial reporting, internal controls, and enterprise workflows, software retains its dominant role because it offers repeatability and central governance at scale.

Services are the fastest-growing component, with the AI carbon footprint management software market projected to expand at a 21.45% CAGR for this segment from 2026 to 2031. That growth reflects a clear execution gap between what the platform can automate and what organizations still need people to do, especially when supplier data must be collected, cleaned, and validated. Normative's managed service launch in 2026 showed that buyers continue to pay for hands-on inventory support even when they already have access to software functionality. The service layer is also gaining importance because assurance-ready reporting demands method consistency, evidence handling, and process discipline that many organizations still lack internally. Over time, the line between subscription revenue and delivery support is likely to remain blurred because vendors that can combine software with execution support are better positioned to convert demand into successful reporting outcomes.

Cloud-based deployment held 67.12% of revenue in 2025, while hybrid deployment is set to record the fastest growth at a 22.08% CAGR through 2031. Cloud remained the largest model because it supports real-time APIs, makes supplier updates easier, and enables faster integration with reporting workflows that depend on continuous data refresh. It also aligns with the operating preferences of enterprises that want centralized visibility across sites, functions, and external partners without building new infrastructure at every location. At the same time, the hybrid model is gaining traction because some buyers want advanced analytics and reporting flexibility without moving all raw operational data off-premise. That pattern is especially relevant in regulated settings where sensitive plant, workforce, or process data must stay under tighter internal control even as reporting teams need cloud-scale modeling tools.

Microsoft's 2025 Wave 2 release for Dynamics 365 Business Central, which became generally available in January 2026, added Scope 3 value chain process automation into ERP purchasing workflows, demonstrating how deployment choices are increasingly shaped by the systems companies already use. On-premise deployment still matters in sectors such as oil and gas, defense, and parts of the public sector where emissions data overlaps with commercially sensitive or classified operating information. In that environment, hybrid architecture is less a temporary compromise and more a long-term operating model that combines on-premise control with cloud-based intelligence. The AI carbon footprint management software market is therefore moving toward a layered deployment design, where the data source may remain internal, but analytics, benchmarking, and reporting functions continue to shift to flexible cloud environments.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Component
  • Software
  • Services
• By Deployment Mode
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premise
  • Hybrid
• By Enterprise Size
  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium Enterprises
• By End-Use Industry
  • IT and Telecom
  • BFSI
  • Industrial Manufacturing
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Oil and Gas
  • Retail and E-Commerce
  • Food and Beverage Manufacturing
  • Construction and Infrastructure
  • Government and Public Sector
  • Other End-User Industries
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Europe held 34.56% of the AI carbon footprint management software market share in 2025, maintaining its lead. That position rests on the phased rollout of the CSRD and the broader maturity of corporate climate commitments across large European companies. The Science Based Targets initiative showed that CAC 40 and DAX 40 companies reached target penetration rates of 70% and 68% by the end of 2025, pointing to a deep installed base for ongoing software use, renewals, and upgrades. That mix of regulation and target validation means demand in Europe is not limited to first-time compliance deployments, because many buyers also need better controls, broader Scope 3 coverage, and stronger audit support. The region, therefore, remains the clearest example of how regulatory depth and corporate commitment can reinforce each other inside the AI carbon footprint management software market.

North America moved closer to a stronger adoption phase as regulatory deadlines approached. California's SB 253 created an August 10, 2026, deadline for Scope 1 and Scope 2 disclosure from large entities doing business in the state, with Scope 3 reporting beginning in 2027. The S&P 500 reached 39% SBTi target penetration by the end of 2025, which was below leading European benchmarks and suggests that the region still has meaningful room for new deployments rather than only upgrade demand. Asia-Pacific is projected to expand at a 22.67% CAGR through 2031, making it the fastest-growing geography in the AI carbon footprint management software market. China's 92% increase in SBTi-validated companies in 2025 points to a strong supply-chain spillover effect, while Japan's market is being supported by product launches such as ASUENE IMPACT and by more detailed carbon accounting standards from domestic technology leaders.

South America remained an earlier-stage market, but the direction of travel was positive because reporting expectations and export-linked supply chain requests continued to spread. SBTi target adoption in South America grew 42% in 2025, and Mexico posted a 58% increase in validated companies, showing that cross-border value chains are already influencing software demand in the region. The Middle East and Africa also remained at an earlier stage of adoption, with the UAE and Saudi Arabia as the main demand centers under broader net-zero and investment-led transition agendas. In both regions, the near-term trigger is often supply-chain pressure from European and North American buyers rather than a fully mature domestic disclosure regime, which means software demand is likely to remain closely linked to global trade relationships and customer reporting expectations.

1. Persefoni AI, Inc.
2. Watershed, Inc.
3. Normative Group AB
4. Greenly SAS
5. Sweep SAS
6. Plan A Technologies GmbH
7. SINAI Technologies, Inc.
8. Green Project Technologies (ACT Group)
9. CarbonChain Limited
10. CarbonCloud AB
11. 51 To Carbon Zero Limited
12. Cority Software Inc.
13. Benchmark Gensuite LLC
14. FigBytes Inc.
15. Diligent Corporation
16. Workiva Inc.
17. Enablon B.V.
18. Intelex Technologies ULC
19. EcoVadis SAS
20. IBM Corporation
21. SAP SE
22. Salesforce, Inc.
23. Microsoft Corporation
24. Schneider Electric SE

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising Regulatory Pressure for Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 Disclosure
  • 4.2.2 Corporate Net-Zero Commitments and Science Based Targets Adoption
  • 4.2.3 AI-Powered Automation Reducing Manual Carbon Data Workflows
  • 4.2.4 Enterprise Demand for Audit-Ready Sustainability Reporting
  • 4.2.5 Supplier-Level Carbon Visibility Requirements in Complex Value Chains
  • 4.2.6 Integration of Carbon Data With ERP, EHS, and Financial Reporting Systems
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Data Quality Gaps Across Scope 3 Supply Chains
  • 4.3.2 High Implementation and Integration Costs for Mid-Market Buyers
  • 4.3.3 Limited Internal Carbon Accounting Expertise in Emerging Enterprises
  • 4.3.4 Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Concerns in Cloud-Based Carbon Platforms
• 4.4 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.7 Technological Outlook
• 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.8.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.8.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.8.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Component
  • 5.1.1 Software
  • 5.1.2 Services
• 5.2 By Deployment Mode
  • 5.2.1 Cloud-Based
  • 5.2.2 On-Premise
  • 5.2.3 Hybrid
• 5.3 By Enterprise Size
  • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
  • 5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
• 5.4 By End-Use Industry
  • 5.4.1 IT and Telecom
  • 5.4.2 BFSI
  • 5.4.3 Industrial Manufacturing
  • 5.4.4 Energy and Utilities
  • 5.4.5 Oil and Gas
  • 5.4.6 Retail and E-Commerce
  • 5.4.7 Food and Beverage Manufacturing
  • 5.4.8 Construction and Infrastructure
  • 5.4.9 Government and Public Sector
  • 5.4.10 Other End-User Industries
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Russia
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 India
    • 5.5.4.3 Japan
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Turkey
      • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Egypt
      • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Persefoni AI, Inc.
  • 6.4.2 Watershed, Inc.
  • 6.4.3 Normative Group AB
  • 6.4.4 Greenly SAS
  • 6.4.5 Sweep SAS
  • 6.4.6 Plan A Technologies GmbH
  • 6.4.7 SINAI Technologies, Inc.
  • 6.4.8 Green Project Technologies (ACT Group)
  • 6.4.9 CarbonChain Limited
  • 6.4.10 CarbonCloud AB
  • 6.4.11 51 To Carbon Zero Limited
  • 6.4.12 Cority Software Inc.
  • 6.4.13 Benchmark Gensuite LLC
  • 6.4.14 FigBytes Inc.
  • 6.4.15 Diligent Corporation
  • 6.4.16 Workiva Inc.
  • 6.4.17 Enablon B.V.
  • 6.4.18 Intelex Technologies ULC
  • 6.4.19 EcoVadis SAS
  • 6.4.20 IBM Corporation
  • 6.4.21 SAP SE
  • 6.4.22 Salesforce, Inc.
  • 6.4.23 Microsoft Corporation
  • 6.4.24 Schneider Electric SE

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment